Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Friend or Foe
of Freedom?
Thomas J. DiLorenzo
Author
Lincoln Unmasked and The Real Lincoln
and
Joseph A. Morris
President
Lincoln Legal Foundation
Remarks delivered at
Published by
Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page v
Joseph L. Bast, The Heartland Institute
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 1
Dan Miller, Chicago Sun-Times
Opening Statement
Lincoln: Foe of Freedom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 5
Thomas J. DiLorenzo
Opening Statement
Lincoln: Friend of Freedom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 13
Joseph A. Morris
Cross Examination
Audience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . page 29
- iii -
Preface
-v-
LINCOLN: FRIEND OR FOE OF FREEDOM?
Rest in Peace
There are some people – friends of freedom, we call them – who
are not here tonight, who passed away since we last met here in
October 2007.
Most recently, John Berthoud, president of the National
Taxpayers Union, passed away on September 26. John was a
friend and an outstanding, hard-working guy. The National
Taxpayers Union is one of the most important organizations in the
country. John was only 45 years old, and he will be sorely missed.
Another man down is Tim Wheeler. As many of you know,
especially you libertarian activists, Tim was one of the original
writers for National Review. I got to know him over the years as a
freelance writer and ghostwriter for various prominent people. A
remarkable, tireless, and talented writer, and an absolutely
principled free-market advocate. He passed away on August 5.
Prof. Hans Sennholz passed away on June 23 at age of 85. He
was one of the founders of the modern libertarian movement, a
teacher of four generations of students at Grove City College, and
president of FEE, the Foundation for Economic Education, for five
- vi -
PREFACE
years.
Richard Rue passed away on May 16. Rick worked for the
Lincoln Legal Foundation and for The Heartland Institute in the
1990s, and then for the United Republican Fund and a number of
other groups. He passed away in California.
Nobel Laureate Dr. Milton Friedman passed away on
November 16, 2006. Dr. Friedman was, of course, the greatest
economist of the twentieth century, a brilliant libertarian thinker,
and in many ways and at many times a friend to me and of The
Heartland Institute. He may have been the shortest giant who ever
lived. God bless you, Milton, and bless Rose, too.
And finally, Lord Ralph Harris passed away on October 19,
2006. He was the first employee of the Institute for Economic
Affairs, the grand-daddy of libertarian think tanks, based in
London. He was an advisor to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.
We honor the memory of these distinguished men, and we
rededicate ourselves to their cause of lifting the heavy hand of
tyranny from the backs of men and women, here and around the
world, who strive to be free.
Growing Organization
The first time The Heartland Institute held an anniversary benefit
dinner, we had 18 people show up. Half of them were board
members, about a quarter or a third of them were the spouses of
board members, and there were two guys who were catching a
smoke outside the door that the hotel asked to come in because we
were paying for the meals anyway. It was a very small but
dedicated group.
Each year we get a little bit bigger. And although we haven’t
set a record this year — we had at least 600 people once before —
- vii -
LINCOLN: FRIEND OR FOE OF FREEDOM?
A Mixed Year
Heartland has had a great year, and it has grown dramatically. The
number of donors is more than 2,000, up from 1,400 just a year
ago. The number of contacts with elected officials is increasing
dramatically. Our press coverage has never been as good as it’s
been recently. We’ve published twice as many books in the past 12
months as in the previous 12 months, and a whole lot more policy
studies and research and commentary pieces.
Unfortunately, it hasn’t been such a good year for freedom –
and the ultimate objective for The Heartland Institute is, of course,
to advance freedom.
In many states we saw massive tax increases and tax increase
proposals. The federal government is still spending every year
hundreds of billions of dollars more than it brings in. We’ve seen
new proposals to socialize our health care system – an idea that
was bankrupt 20 years ago and 10 years ago. Why presidential
candidates are still talking about nationalizing our health care
- viii -
PREFACE
system is beyond me, but it’s an indication that our educational job
obviously is not finished. It’s incomplete.
And we can’t seem to move the ball down the field on school
choice. One of the most important things we can do to expand
freedom in America is to give parents the power to choose where
their kids go to school. But the teacher unions are powerful, and
they act as a buffer against any of our efforts to expand these
programs. There has been some progress, some very modest
programs, but again it’s a disappointment for people who are
advocates of freedom.
Likewise with tax and expenditure limitations. We’ve been
trying to get states to adopt constitutional amendments that would
limit their spending and their taxing ability. That effort ran into
some very fierce opposition last year, and we’re not making much
progress.
And finally, on the environment. Don’t get me started on the
environment! Former vice president Albert Gore gets the Noble
Peace Prize for producing a propaganda film that most scientists
will say exaggerates, lies, and distorts the actual science on climate
change. It’s a symbol of what’s wrong in America with public
policy today. We’re not making a lot of progress. If this is an issue
of concern to you, I hope you will talk to me or to Fred Smith,
because Fred’s shop is doing terrific work on this as well.
Heartland’s History
Let me conclude quickly by giving you a little nutshell description
of The Heartland Institute – since it is, after all, The Heartland
Institute that brings you here tonight and that your contributions
are supporting.
Heartland was started 23 years ago. I was a student at the
- ix -
LINCOLN: FRIEND OR FOE OF FREEDOM?
-x-
PREFACE
identifies all of the groups that ever got any money from
ExxonMobil Corporation. The Heartland Institute appears on each
of those Web sites.
We’re accused of being a front for big corporations, in
particular Exxon. It’s not the case.
No corporation gives more than 5 percent of The Heartland
Institute’s annual budget. This year, all the energy companies
combined are going to give less than 5 percent of our total annual
budget. If funding influences our opinions, then when 95 percent
of our income is coming from energy consumers and not energy
producers you would think we’d have a pretty strong anti-oil
company bias, but in fact we don’t.
The truth is we have a program and people absolutely
committed to principles and the ideas of free enterprise. Our
donors support us because they agree with those ideas, not because
they want to change our message.
So that’s what The Heartland Institute is, and that’s why you
are here tonight helping us raise money to keep this fantastic
program going and expanding all the time. I am deeply grateful to
every one of you who bought a ticket or table tonight ... and I hope
you have a real good time.
Joseph Bast
President, The Heartland Institute
October 25, 2007
- xi -
Introduction
By Dan Miller1
Good evening, I’m Dan Miller. I’m business editor of the Chicago
Sun-Times and have been a member of and donor to The Heartland
Institute for a couple decades. I am honored and delighted that Joe
Bast tapped me to moderate this debate. It’s great to be with
friends and old faces.
And speaking of old faces ...
I’m sure Fred Smith doesn’t remember anything about meeting
me when I was chairman of the Illinois Commerce Commission,
but I want you all to know that Fred is in the cross-hairs of a smear
campaign that hits not only the Competitive Enterprise Institute –
and we’ve been privileged at the Chicago Sun-Times to publish
several articles by CEI people – but also The Heartland Institute,
Cato, and so many others.
The effort now on the part of the left is to demonize all of the
people who favor limited government, individual liberty, and
personal responsibility. It’s a very, very serious effort to
undermine everything that people in this room have worked for.
Fred is especially in the cross-hairs, and Joe is just a micro- inch
away from the cross-hairs. It’s something that you’ve got to be
aware of. They’re after us – they’re after us big-time.
1
Dan Miller is business editor of the Chicago Sun-Times.
-1-
LINCOLN: FRIEND OR FOE OF FREEDOM?
Lincoln’s Legacy
Like many of you, I presume, I grew up and grew older regarding
Abraham Lincoln as one of our greatest presidents. He preserved
the Union against the rebels, he freed the slaves, he urged
reconciliation during Reconstruction, he was humble and a leader
of enormous charisma, and persistent.
It was only in recent years, however, that I realized others have
challenged those assumptions. Yes, he preserved the Union – but
where in the Constitution does it prohibit states from seceding?
And by what legal right did Lincoln prosecute the Civil War or, as
one of our debaters tonight calls it, “the war between the states,”
or, when he gets really personal, “Lincoln’s war”?
Yes, the Emancipation Proclamation freed the slaves, but only
the slaves in the secessionist South, where the proclamation had
absolutely no force of law. Where the proclamation could have had
some force of law, in the border states that didn’t secede, such as
Maryland and Kentucky and Pennsylvania, it specifically
permitted slavery to continue.
Humble? Yes, yes, Lincoln in his speeches and his personal
life dramatized an innate humility. But politically, when he won
the presidential nomination in 1860 here in Chicago, he had
demonstrated the political savvy and cruelty that exploited the
moment of the instance that he was nominated.
My point is this: Reasonable people – and you wouldn’t be a
Heartland person if you were anything but reasonable – can
discuss and disagree about Lincoln and his legacy. But we don’t
have to be disagreeable. We all share a common respect for
-2-
INTRODUCTION
Tonight’s Debate
Here’s how the debate works. One debater, Tom DiLorenzo, will
begin with a 10-minute presentation on the subject at one podium.
The second debater, Joe Morris, will have an equal amount of time
at the other podium. My job is not to interfere with the free flow of
ideas.
While the debate is going on, please write any questions you
may have for either or both of the debaters on the cards available
from Heartland staffers in the room. After the presentations I’ll
select some questions from the cards. Around 8:40 p.m. I’ll signal
the last question.
-3-
Opening Statement
Corwin Amendment
One of the first things Abraham Lincoln did after he was elected
and before he was inaugurated was to instruct William Seward
[U.S. Senator from New York] to get a constitutional amendment
through the Senate that would forbid the federal government from
ever interfering with slavery in the South. And Seward did. It was
called the Corwin Amendment, named after [Ohio Republican
Congressman] Thomas Corwin.
Lincoln also instructed Seward to get a federal law passed that
would nullify the personal liberty laws that existed in some of the
2
Thomas J. DiLorenzo, Ph.D. is the author of Lincoln Unmasked and The
Real Lincoln, among other books, and an American economics professor
at Loyola College in Maryland.
-5-
LINCOLN: FRIEND OR FOE OF FREEDOM?
New England states. Under these laws, the New England states
refused to enforce the Fugitive Slave Act.
And so Lincoln did everything he could to get a constitutional
amendment passed that would have forbidden the government
from ever interfering with slavery. That amendment was passed by
the House and the Senate and several states. In Lincoln’s first
inaugural address he supported it explicitly.
Hampton Roads
Four years later, in February 1865, there was a peace conference
between Alexander Stephens, the vice president of the Confederate
government, and his entourage, and Lincoln and Seward and a few
others. They met at Hampton Roads, Virginia. They talked about
ending the war, of course.
Lincoln and Seward told them the Emancipation Proclamation
was a war measure – and, therefore, when the war was over it
would no longer be in effect in any way. They also told them the
Thirteenth Amendment, which was making its way through
Congress at the time, to abolish slavery, could easily be defeated if
the South would just rejoin the Union. There were 36 states at the
time, and Seward instructed Stephens they needed only 10 states to
defeat the Thirteenth Amendment.
This dispels one of the bigger myths about Lincoln, who
people say didn’t do anything about slavery at the beginning of his
administration because he didn’t have any political clout to do it.
In fact, Lincoln maintained the same position for the last four years
of his life, and that position was: “We won’t touch Southern
slavery, I’m only interested in opposing the extension of slavery
into the territories. Stay in the Union and you can keep your
slaves.”
-6-
DILORENZO: FOE
-7-
LINCOLN: FRIEND OR FOE OF FREEDOM?
-8-
DILORENZO: FOE
-9-
LINCOLN: FRIEND OR FOE OF FREEDOM?
for Taney. He gave it to his friend and employee at the time, Ward
Lamon. There are several very good sources on this, like Ward
Lamon’s book, which is in the archives of the Huntington Library,
and the biography of Benjamin Robbins Curtis, who was a
supreme court justice who authored the opposing opinion in the
Dred Scott case and defended Andrew Johnson in his
impeachment.
9. He rigged Northern elections. West Virginia was allowed to
secede, illegally, from the rest of Virginia. The Constitution
requires Congress and the state legislature to agree on partitioning
a state and creating a new state. That didn’t happen. Northern
elections were rigged with the help of federal soldiers.
These are among the reasons why generations of historians
have referred to Lincoln as a dictator.
Jefferson on Secession
So what did Thomas Jefferson think about secession? He said if
the western part of the country ever seceded from the east, “[t]hose
of the Western confederacy will be as much our children and
descendants as those of the Eastern.” That was in 1804, many,
many years after the Declaration of Secession – which was the
Declaration of Independence.
Contrast that with Lincoln. In his first inaugural address, when
discussing the possibility that states might secede, he used the
words “invasion” and “bloodshed.” He was the anti-Jefferson as
far as I’m concerned.
In terms of economics, Lincoln was a mercantilist, so he was
against economic freedom. He was a protectionist, a champion of
corporate welfare, and a champion of inflationary finance through
central banking. He admitted that he spent his entire career as a
- 10 -
DILORENZO: FOE
- 11 -
LINCOLN: FRIEND OR FOE OF FREEDOM?
- 12 -
Opening Statement
Ladies and gentlemen, Abe Lincoln was not perfect. Abe Lincoln
was a clever, calculating pol. Abe Lincoln was from Illinois ...
What’s news?
I think it is a healthy thing that the world recognize that no
politician is perfect, because it is a mistake, it is dangerous to
liberties, to translate political leadership into sainthood. It is a
mistake to think that political leaders are the source of salvation on
this Earth.
But once we recognize that, I think it’s important that we face
the facts and understand what principled and constructive and
accomplished political leadership is, and what it can do. It’s only
fair to recognize what Abraham Lincoln achieved for the people of
the United States, which in my view was to make real the promise
of the Declaration of Independence.
3
Joseph A. Morris, J.D., is president of the Lincoln Legal Foundation and
a partner in the law firm of Morris & DeLaRosa, with offices in Chicago
and London.
- 13 -
LINCOLN: FRIEND OR FOE OF FREEDOM?
- 14 -
MORRIS: FRIEND
I am here to argue facts for Abraham Lincoln, and let’s begin with
some fundamentals.
Dedicated to a Proposition
Lincoln is perhaps best-known for those words he uttered at
Gettysburg. The opening lines that Lincoln spoke at Gettysburg are
ones we all remember ... and little understand. And I respectfully
submit that in those words with which Lincoln opened the address
at Gettysburg, you will see the essential kernel of Lincoln’s
understanding of what the American federation and nation is, and
why it ought to matter to those of us who are lovers of liberty.
Remember those words:
Now, I think we all have some grasp of the proposition “all men
are created equal.” Let there be no doubt about it, Lincoln was an
opponent of slavery. He made it very clear throughout his career in
Illinois as a political man that he did not think it was right to live
off the sweat of the brow of another. He told us over and over
again, as he would not be a slave, he would not be a master. We
understand that Lincoln was an advocate of the notion that all men
are created equal, even if that means that in a particular situation at
a particular time, they find themselves in a political society that
holds only imperfectly to that standard.
And I think we understand even the higher calling of his
argument, that this was a nation conceived in liberty and dedicated
to a proposition – unlike the Danes and the Britons and the Irish
- 15 -
LINCOLN: FRIEND OR FOE OF FREEDOM?
and the French, and people all around the world, whose nationhood
was a fact of nature, it was an accident of history, it was a
condition they found upon them when they emerged into the
sunlight of civilization.
The American nation was something that was created as a
series of conscious acts, coming out of a revolutionary past, with
ideas in mind. What other nation can say as its birthright that it’s
dedicated to a proposition, rather than merely occupying a piece of
land or speaking a particular language or embracing a particular
culture?
Lincoln told us that this was a nation dedicated to a
proposition, and by opening our eyes to that fact, if nothing else,
Lincoln deserves the undying gratitude of people who love liberty
the world over.
- 16 -
MORRIS: FRIEND
- 17 -
LINCOLN: FRIEND OR FOE OF FREEDOM?
- 18 -
MORRIS: FRIEND
DiLorenzo has a hard time answering are very simple. Mr. Lincoln
became president of the United States on the fourth day of March
in 1861. Prior to the end of February 1861, seven southern states
had already purported to secede. In early February 1861, the
Confederate so-called Congress had already convened in
Richmond. By the 18th and 19th of February 1861, Jefferson Davis
was already the president of the so-called Confederacy. Jeff Davis
was the rebel president before Abe Lincoln ever arrived in
Washington and took his oath of office as president of the United
States.
If you want to know who started the Civil War, look south and
look to people who had one and only one issue – maybe Tom and I
will get a chance to debate this. One and only one issue was the
real precipitant of that war, and it was the cause of slavery.
- 19 -
Rebuttal
Thomas J. DiLorenzo
Well, I’m sure Joe is not calling Lincoln a liar when he says
slavery was the only cause. Lincoln himself always said the
extension of slavery was what he was strenuously opposed to. He
explicitly said, at his first inaugural for example, that he had no
intent to disturb Southern slavery.
On the Gettysburg Address, fourscore and seven years ago, of
course that’s not when the country was founded – it was with the
Constitution. And yes, Lincoln said “a nation was founded,” but
the founders did not create a nation. They created a confederacy, a
union of states, but it wasn’t a nation and there wasn’t a national
government.
Do We Have a Nation?
Lincoln wanted it to be a national government. Alexander
Hamilton’s agenda at the Constitutional Convention was to get a
permanent president who would appoint all the governors and have
veto power over all state legislation – essentially a king. That’s
why Jefferson himself hated Alexander Hamilton. I’ve just written
a book on this, called Hamilton’s Curse, which is coming out next
year.
- 21 -
LINCOLN: FRIEND OR FOE OF FREEDOM?
Jeffersonian Mantle
In What Lincoln Believed, Michael Lind makes the case that the
main reason Lincoln brought the “all men are created equal”
language into the Gettysburg Address is that he wanted to win
votes from the Jeffersonians in the North – he wanted to wrap
himself in the Jeffersonian mantle.
If you read the whole Declaration of Independence, it is a
declaration of secession from the British Empire. Lincoln totally
- 22 -
DILORENZO: REBUTTAL
- 23 -
Rebuttal
Joseph A. Morris
This debate over the question of when America began is not mere
metaphysics. It really matters. I think it matters for the reasons that
I’ve described, and I just urge you all: Go yourselves to the texts. I
carry around in my pocket my Cato Institute copy of the
Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. It’s there every
day, and I make my living with it.
The Declaration of Independence opens with the immortal
words, “When in the course of human events it becomes necessary
for one people to dissolve the political bands which have
connected them with another” – one people.
Already in 1776, the Congress assembled at Philadelphia was
exercising power – by itself, without sending messengers back to
the 13 colonies to canvass the views of the leadership in the 13
colonies as to what this new “emerging American nation” –
so-called by Benjamin Franklin – was going to do. They identified
themselves as one people, a people – not a government, but a
people.
And then they proceeded to spend the next 13 years
experimenting with the kind of governmental institutions that they
thought would be most conducive to their happiness and to their
liberty.
- 25 -
LINCOLN: FRIEND OR FOE OF FREEDOM?
Madison on Secession
Now, Mr. Jefferson was blessed, as some great men are, by having
a great man at his right arm. And that great man was James
Madison – who, probably more than anyone else, was responsible
for the form and text of the document that we revere as the
Constitution, as the fundamental law of our political regime, of our
government. And when, as Tom correctly told you, in the 1800s
Mr. Jefferson fulminated a bit off the ranch on the question of
secession, it was Mr. Madison who reined him in.
Although he was a Jeffersonian Republican and a southern
agrarian and disliked Alexander Hamilton every bit as much as
Tom DiLorenzo or you or I might dislike Alexander Hamilton, it
was Mr. Madison who correctly pointed out to Jefferson and
attained Jefferson’s concession, that the Constitution, which
contains no express provision opposing secession, contains no
express provision providing for it.
As a matter of fact, Madison pointed out to Jefferson, that to
allow what Mr. Calhoun wanted in South Carolina – nullification
by the states of federal decisions – or to allow the secession of an
individual state, would be to allow one state on its own to amend
the federal constitution, and that wasn’t the deal. The deal from the
outset was, once you joined the federation as a political matter,
you were bound by the three-fourths rule and you were bound by
the republican guarantee clause and you were bound by the
territorial provisions.
Remember, by the time we get to the Civil War, we have way
more than 13 states in the union. Where did those other states
come from? Those states were carved out of territories that had
been, in a sense, the common property of the original 13 states
acquired at various times and in various ways. If you are seceding,
do you get to take your share of those other derivative states and
- 26 -
MORRIS: REBUTTAL
- 27 -
LINCOLN: FRIEND OR FOE OF FREEDOM?
Confederate Constitution
Don’t look to the constitution of the Confederacy, much admired
by Tom DiLorenzo, for meaningful answers to those questions.
Because the truth is, ladies and gentlemen, that that constitution,
for all its fancy rhetoric, was never successfully implemented by
the so-called lovers of liberty of the South – which had, if you
want to get into the facts, a far larger, more brutal, and more
pervasive KGB and political suppression system than did anything
Mr. Lincoln or Secretary Seward imagined.
- 28 -
Cross-Examination
- 29 -
LINCOLN: FRIEND OR FOE OF FREEDOM?
- 30 -
CROSS-EXAMINATION
Miller: Joe, why not let the South secede? Wouldn’t the North be
in a better position to end slavery once the North was free from the
Fugitive Slave Act?
- 31 -
LINCOLN: FRIEND OR FOE OF FREEDOM?
Miller: Tom, did Lincoln not clearly show, in his second inaugural
address, that both sides had significant responsibility for the war
and the deaths?
- 32 -
CROSS-EXAMINATION
- 33 -
LINCOLN: FRIEND OR FOE OF FREEDOM?
the courts what they had just gained through 620,000 deaths.
Tom, and then Joe: What would the United States look like today if
the South had been allowed to secede peacefully?
- 34 -
CROSS-EXAMINATION
- 35 -
LINCOLN: FRIEND OR FOE OF FREEDOM?
- 36 -
Speaker Biographies
- 37 -
LINCOLN: FRIEND OR FOE OF FREEDOM?
- 38 -
The Heartland Institute is a national nonprofit public policy
research organization based in Chicago. Founded in 1984, its
mission is to discover, develop, and promote free-market solutions
to social and economic problems. Such solutions include parental
choice in education, market-based approaches to environmental
protection and health care finance, tax and spending limitation, and
deregulation in areas where property rights and markets do a better
job than government bureaucracies.
Heartland publishes books and policy studies, hosts an online
clearinghouse for public policy research and commentary called
PolicyBot, organizes events featuring experts on public policy
issues, and supports a growing network of prominent senior
fellows.
Heartland’s unique contribution to the national debate over
public policy is its series of five monthly public policy
newspapers: Budget & Tax News, Environment & Climate News,
Health Care News, InfoTech & Telecom News, and School Reform
News. These publications feature the best work of the country’s
leading think tanks and present research and commentary as news.
Heartland sends these public policy newspapers to every state
and national elected official in the U.S., plus 8,440 local officials,
2,000 journalists, and thousands of subscribers, Heartland
supporters, and opinion leaders.
- 39 -
LINCOLN: FRIEND OR FOE OF FREEDOM?
- 40 -
Abraham Lincoln:
Friend or Foe of Freedom?
Order Form
Number of copies x
volume discounts
Price/copy = prices include shipping/handling
Signature
Name
Title
Business
Street
Preferred Phone
Preferred Email
Please mail this form and check or money order to The Heartland Institute, 19
South LaSalle Street #903, Chicago, Illinois 60603. Questions? Call 312/377-
4000. For more information about The Heartland Institute, visit our Web site at
www.heartland.org.