Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1, JANUARY 2014
27
I. INTRODUCTION
28
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 62, NO. 1, JANUARY 2014
(1)
and
are refractive indices of the media flanking
where
is the total number of the layers, i.e.,
the film, and
in our case. It can be shown that
regardless
the values of
and , showing that it is a good reflective film
for obtaining an excellent mirror.
It is known that the sensitivity of light-adapted eyes is generally maximum when the wavelength
is 555 nm. With this
wavelength, the thickness of the film can be calculated as
(2)
Obviously, this thickness is negligibly small as compared
with the dimensions of the glass and DRA. Therefore, the film
can be neglected in designing the proposed MIDRA.
III. ENDFIRE TM
-MODE MIDRA
A. Configuration
Fig. 1 shows the antenna configuration. A cylindrical DRA
with a radius of , a height of , and a dielectric constant of
is placed on a circular ground plane. The DRA is
excited in its fundamental endfire TM
mode using an axial
coaxial probe with a length of and a radius of
mm.
On top of the DRA is a piece of glass with the same radius and
a thickness of . Here, the DRA, glass, and ground plane have the
same cross section so that the composite structure forms a single
circular cylinder that can be handled conveniently. To obtain a
mirror, the bottom of the glass is coated with a light-reflective
film, which has been discussed in detail in the last section.
B. Measured and Simulated Results
The dielectric constant of the glass was measured using an
Agilent 85070D Dielectric Probe Kit. It was found that the dielectric constant is given by
from 2.0 GHz to 3.0
GHz. A dielectric material of
was used to fabricate
Fig. 2. (a) Photo of the MIDRA prototype. (b) Photo showing the image of a
coin at normal incidence without the DRA. The paper at the bottom is used to fix
the mirror. (c) Photo showing the semitransparent image for an oblique viewing
angle. (d) The image in (c) becomes good when the mirror is backed with an
opaque material which is the DRA in this case.
Fig. 3. Measured and simulated reflection coefficients of the MIDRA and reference antenna. The design parameters are given in Table I.
shows the image when the mirror is backed by the DRA. It can
be observed that a good image is now obtained again.
To investigate the effect of the reflective coating, a reference antenna without any reflective coating was also fabricated.
In this paper, the reflection coefficients were measured using
an Agilent 8753ES vector network analyzer, while the radiation patterns and antenna gains were measured using a Satimo
StarLab system. Fig. 3 plots the measured and simulated reflection coefficients of the proposed and reference antennas. Since
the constitutive parameters of the coating are not known, the
MIDRA cannot be simulated and only its measured result is
shown in the figure. In contrast, both measured and simulated
results of the reference antenna are provided in the figure. For
the MIDRA, its measured 10-dB impedance bandwidth is 3.7%
(2.392.48 GHz), which entirely covers the 2.4-GHz WLAN
band (2.402.48 GHz). It can be seen from the figure that the
result nearly coincides with that of the reference antenna, implying that the effect of the coating is negligible. It can also
be seen that the measured resonance frequency
is
slightly higher than the simulated value, which should be caused
by experimental imperfections including possible air gaps introduced between the different interfaces.
To study the effect of the glass on the antenna, the cylindrical
DRA without the glass overlay was also simulated and measured. It was found that in this case the measured resonance frequency
shifts upwards from 2.43 GHz (MIDRA) to
2.62 GHz (DRA without glass). In other words, adding the glass
layer will decrease the resonance frequency of the antenna. This
is reasonable because a larger dielectric volume should have a
lower resonance frequency.
Fig. 4 displays the measured radiation patterns of the
MIDRA, along with the measured and simulated results of the
reference antenna. With reference to the figure, the three results
are in good agreement. It can be observed from the figure that
the MIDRA has an omnidirectional radiation pattern, which is
expected for the fundamental endfire TM
mode. For each
result, the copolarized field is stronger than the crosspolarized
counterpart by at least 15 dB, which is acceptable.
Fig. 5 compares the measured antenna gains between the
MIDRA and reference antenna. It also displays the simulated
antenna gain of the reference antenna, which is in reasonable
29
Fig. 4. Measured and simulated radiation patterns of the MIDRA and refer. The design
ence antenna. (a) Elevation plane. (b) Azimuth plane
parameters are given in Table I.
Fig. 5. Measured and simulated maximum gains of the MIDRA and reference
antenna. The design parameters are given in Table I.
30
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 62, NO. 1, JANUARY 2014
-MODE MIDRA
A. Configuration
The antenna configuration of the broadside case is shown in
Fig. 7. The cylindrical DR has a height of , a radius of
,
and a dielectric constant of
. On top of it is a piece
of glass with a thickness of . In this case, a much larger glass
with a radius of
mm is used to show the flexibility
of the design. The cylindrical DR is excited in its fundamental
broadside HEM mode by a rectangular slot printed on a substrate having a thickness of
mm and dielectric constant
of
. A 50- microstrip line is printed on the other
side of the substrate. The same type of light-reflective dielectric
film is used again for the mirror design. To avoid the semitransparent problem at large oblique viewing angles, the coated glass
is backed with a piece of paper.
Fig. 7. Configuration of the proposed broadside MIDRA. (a) Top view. (b)
Illustration of different parts of the configuration.
TABLE II
DESIGN PARAMETERS OF THE BROADSIDE MIDRA (UNIT: mm)
31
Fig. 8. (a) Photo of the slot-fed DRA prototype. (b) Photo of the proposed
MIDRA with a piece of opaque paper at back, from which a clear image of the
glass swan can be observed and no semitransparent issue can be found from an
oblique viewing angle.
Fig. 11. Antenna boresight gains of the MIDRA and reference antenna. The
design parameters are given in Table II.
Fig. 9. Measured and simulated reflection coefficients of the MIDRA and reference antenna. The design parameters are given in Table II.
Fig. 12. Simulated bandwidth and resonance frequency as a function of mirror
thickness . Other design parameters are given in Table II.
Fig. 10. Measured and simulated radiation patterns of the MIDRA and referplane. (b) Elevation
plane.
ence antenna at 2.44 GHz. (a) Elevation
The design parameters are given in Table II.
higher than the simulated frequency due to experimental imperfections as mentioned before.
Fig. 10 shows the radiation patterns of the MIDRA and reference antenna at 2.44 GHz. From the figure, broadside radiation
patterns are observed for both antennas, as expected. The result
of the MIDRA almost coincides with that of the reference antenna, further showing that the coating and paper has no virtual
effect on the antenna performance. For each antenna, the copolarized field is stronger than the crosspolarized counterpart by
at least 20 dB. It can be seen from the figure that the measured
and simulated radiation patterns of the reference antenna are in
good agreement.
Fig. 11 shows the boresight gains of the MIDRA and reference antenna. With reference to the figure, the measured results
of the two antennas are, again, very close to each other. It can
be found from the figure that the measured gains of the antennas
are 4.5 dB over the WLAN band (2.42.48 GHz), which is
0.5 dB lower than the simulated result.
From the results of Figs. 911, it is obvious that the effects
of the reflective film and backing paper on the antenna performance are negligibly small, simplifying the MIDRA design.
The effect of the mirror (glass) thickness on the impedance
bandwidth is studied in Fig. 12. With reference to the figure,
the bandwidth increases with an increase of , which can be expected from the knowledge of the two-layer DRA. As discussed
before, however, cannot be too large or the image will be unclear. The effect of on the resonance frequency of the antenna
was also studied and displayed in the same figure. As can be observed from the figure, the resonance frequency decreases with
increasing , which is consistent with the fact that a larger resonator has a lower resonance frequency.
V. CONCLUSION
An MIDRA has been proposed and investigated for the first
time. It consists of a conventional DRA and an overlaid glass
layer. The back of the glass layer is coated with a nonconducting
light-reflective film to provide the mirror function. Both endfire
and broadside MIDRAs have been studied in this paper. In the
former case, a cylindrical MIDRA fed by an axial coaxial probe
was designed, fabricated, and measured. It is excited in its fundamental endfire TM mode. A reference antenna without the
reflective coating was also fabricated to investigate the effect of
32
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, VOL. 62, NO. 1, JANUARY 2014
[16] K. W. Leung, E. H. Lim, and X. S. Fang, Dielectric resonator antennas: From the basic to the aesthetic, Proc. IEEE, vol. 100, no. 7,
pp. 21812193, Jul. 2012.
[17] C. Serra, C. Medeiros, J. Costa, and C. Fernandes, Mirror-integrated
transparent antenna for RFID application, IEEE Antennas Wireless
Propag. Lett., vol. 10, pp. 776779, 2011.
[18] M. Born, E. Wolf, and A. B. Bhatia, Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light.
Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999.