Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
I. Federal Action
Must be a governmental action for the Constitution to apply
A. Does the federal court have the power to decide the case?
1. Congressional limits on jurisdiction
a. The Court only has the power to decide cases
b. Types of SCTOUS Jx
i. Original Jurisdiction
A. Ambassadors
B. Other public Ministers and Consuls
C. State v. State controversies
ii. Appellate Jurisdiction
A. This is at the Courts discretion
B. May hear appeals from state supreme courts
C. Cases involving
1. Admiralty
2. Federal Questions
3. State v. State
4. Diversity
5. State v. foreign citizen
D. Any case arising under the Constitution
1. Judicial powers should arise under case arising under the
Constitution
2. Any case where someone asserts that there constitutional
rights have been violated-the Court has jx
3. If it is a conflict between statute and Constitution, the
Court has the authority to declare the statute
unconstitutional
E. Writ of Mandamus
1. This is an order compelling the government or one of its
agents to do something
c. Congress can limit the Court and federal jx, and it may NOT be expanded
beyond what the constitution allows
i. These are usually compelling and controversial circumstances regarding
whether Congress has the power to deny the federal courts the
power to
hear specific types of cases
ii. The purpose of jx stripping is to achieve a chance in the substantive
law by a procedural device
A. Congress can take away jx, but they cannot overrule SCTOUS
c. Mootness?
i. Doctrine of standing in a timeframe
ii. There must be an actual controversy
iii. The personal interest must exist from start to finish
iv. Exceptions
A. Wrongs Capable of Repetition yet Evading Review
1. Reasonable chance injury can happen again to
2. Injury inherently limited in duration
B. Voluntary Cessation
1. The government voluntarily ceases the allegedly
improper behavior
a. Statutory change
b. Court order moot once there is no chance the
behavior will resume
d. Ripeness?
i. Centers on whether the injury has occurred yet, is it too speculative?
ii. Test:
A. The hardship to the parties for withholding consent
1. Is there a high probability of harm?
2. Are there collateral injuries?
3. Is there a reasonable threat of specific harm?
B. The fitness of the issue for judicial decision making
e. Political Question?
i. The Court does not address issues that are political questions
ii. Examples
A. Foreign Policy
B. Impeachment
B. Assuming the Court has the power to decide the case, is there a
constitutional source of power for the federal legislation that is being
challenged?
1. Possible sources of power
a. Commerce Power?
i. Focus of much of the decisions involving the scope of federal power
ii. Congress may regulate:
A. Channels of interstate commerce
B. The instrumentalities of Interstate commerce
1. Vehicles, shipping
C. Can regulate intrastate if:
1. Test:
a. there a rational connection to interstate
commerce?
b. Economic in nature
B. President may:
1. Execute laws
2. Represent country in foreign policy
3. Formulate treaties and executive agreements
4. Appoint and remove administrative officials
C. Courts may:
1. Decide cases
2. Interpret the law
ii. Congress and law-making power
A. Congress can delegate their power to administrative agencies
1. There must be some standard/ intelligible
principles/standards to guide the agencys exercise
of
discretion
2. Nothing has ever been struck down
3. Does not require any specificity
B. The legislative veto is unconstitutional
1. Congress can only make laws
2. Congress CAN overturn agency decisions as long as
there is bicameralism and presentment
3. Cannot delegate executive powers to itself or agents
4. Congress does control the purse strings of administrative
agencies
iii. Executive Powers
A. Generally
1. Not clearly defined, four approaches:
2. There is NO inherent presidential power
a. President can only act pursuant to express or
clearly implied statutory authority
3. The president can act without express statutory or
constitutional authority so long as the president is
not
usurping the powers of another branch
4. Legislative accountability
a. The president can take any action that is not
prohibited by the Constitution or a statute
5. The president has broad inherent authority
B. Veto
1. The line item veto is unconstitutional
a. This would allow a president to veto particular
parts of appropriation bills while allowing
the rest
to go into effect
2. Can do an all or nothing veto
C. Appointment and Removal
1. Appointment Power
a. The president alone appts ambassadors and
SCOTUS
b. Principle v. Inferior Officers
is the
that the
receive?
10
their
11
achieve that
iii. Race
A. Test
I. Is there a racial classification?
a. Does it discriminate on its face?
b. Did the government purposefully intend to
classify individuals based on their race?
1. There must be intent and actual
discrimination
2. Inaction is not discrimination
II. If so, does it meet strict scrutiny?
a. Is there intent based on the facts?
12
13
14
15
question is
the child
C. Sexual Orientation and Activity
I. Homosexuals can engage in conduct of their choosing
II. This is a right to privacy issue
III. Also a right from unreasonable government intrusion
IV. Test
a. Does the law meet IS? (Yes, gender)
b. Is the law because of animus?
a. Look to intent of the law
D. Medical Care Decisions
I. There is a right to refuse unwanted medical decisions
a. To refuse treatment
b. To keep the government out of certain established
medical procedures
c. There is NOT a right to commit suicide
d. The State can require clear and convincing evidence of
the persons consent re decisions if the person in
not competent to make them
II. If it is an invasive procedure, you can refuse it
a. Fluoridating water is not restrictive
III. The government does not have to provide medical services
unless
a. You are in government custody
b. The government created the danger
IV. The State may prevent family members from terminating
treatment for each other ?
a. The right belongs to the individual
E. Travel
I. There is a fundamental right to interstate movement
II. Issue: Doest the classification penalize or significantly burden
the right to travel?
16
17
18
have a
to
reasonable
to the
must
way
d. Assault
1. Speaker intended speech to strike fear of
imminent harm to as understood by a
person
e. Obscenity
1. Possession in the home cannot be stopped
2. Def: Speech that the average person using
community standards would find to appeal
prurient interest
3. Must show or describe sexual conduct that is
mentioned in the statute in question and it
show the conduct in a patently offensive
4. Taken as a whole must lack serious redeeming
artistic, literary or scientific value
f. Child Pornography
1. This is damaging to children
2. Includes any sort of sexual acts with children
3. If there are no real minors being used, then it is
protected speech
g. False or Misleading Commercial Speech
1. Restricted if an unlawful product
2. When it says one thing but does not do it
A. 40 mph when actually 11
3. To regulate truthful speech there must be
A. Substantial interest
B. Regulation is substantially related to that
interest
III. Viewpoint Discrimination
a. This is NEVER permissible
IV. If it is content based restriction:
a. Strict Scrutiny applies
b. Almost always found to be not constitutional
B. If the target is permissible, is the speech fit/constitutional?
19
the
openings
d. Freedom of Religion
i. Establishment Clause
A. Generally
I. There can be no state religion
II. One religion cannot be favored by another
III. It is more important to not have religion in the schools since
children are young and impressionable while adults can see
history for including prayer at things like legislative
B. Test
I. Is the primary purpose to advance:
a. One religion over another
b. Religion over non religion
II. Is the primary effect to advance:
a. On religion over another
20
C. or
are
21
a. Generally
i. A restriction on a States ability to interfere with interstate
commerce
ii. Threshold: Doe the state or local law violate interstate
commerce?
A. Exceptions
I. Congressional approval
II. Market participant
a. A State may favor its own citizens in
dealing with government owned
business
and in receiving benefits
from government
programs
b. The State must be an actual participator
and not just a regulator in the market
in
question
iii. A law will be found to be discriminatory either if it facially
discriminates against out of staters or it is facially neutral
and is
deemed to have a discriminatory purpose or impact
A. The Court will uphold some highway laws
B. The Court will generally strike down laws that regulate
the out of state conduct of business
b. TESTS:
i. Does the State Impermissibly discriminate against interstate
commerce?
A. Is the law facially discriminatory?
B. Did the law have a discriminatory purpose?
I. Strict Scrutiny
a. Is there a compelling state interest?
b. Is the law narrowly tailored to achieve
that interest?
ii. Does the State action substantially burden interstate commerce?
A. Balance the burden against the needs of the state
B. Use if the law is not discriminatory
3. Supremacy Clause (Preemption)?
a. Generally
i. When federal law overrides state or local law
b. Issue: What is the Congressional intent?
i. It must be clear to find preemption
c. Three Kinds
i. Express
A. When federal law clearly overrides state or local law
B. Requires judicial interpretation as to scope and effect
ii. Conflict
A. When state and federal laws are in opposition to each
other
22
23