TQF 5: Course Report

1. Institution
2. Faculty/Division/Program

Mahidol University International College

Kiattipoom Nantanukul / Part-time Lecturer

Section 1: General Information

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Course code and name

Pre-requisite (if any)
Lecturer
Trimester
Venue

ICEM212 Basic Acting Technique

Kiattipoom Nantanukul
II

Section 2: Comparison of Actual Course Operation with the Course Plan

1. Actual teaching hours compared with the teaching plan

Topic

What is acting?

Teaching
Hours

Actual
Teaching
Hours

8
4

8
4

improvisation
Sensory and memory

exercises
Solo improvised scene

work
Awareness, energy,

4
8

4
8

Actors tools; relaxation

and warm-up
Concentration,
imagination, truth, and
sincerity of the actors
The art of storytelling
Objective, magic-if,
sensory and memory
exercises, and

sensitiveness, Action vs.

Reaction

Duo Improvisation
Duo improvised scene
work
MUIC TQF 5

Page 1

Reasons (if the difference

is more than 25%)

Script analysis
Character building
Space and balancing the
space
Animal exercise

Scene for two actors:

4
4
4

4
4
4

4
24

4
24

developing the scene

2.

Topics that couldnt be taught as planned

Topics that couldnt be taught

(if any)

Significance of the topics that

couldnt be taught

Remedial action

NONE

3. Effectiveness of the teaching methods specified in the Course Specification

Learning Outcomes

Teaching methods
specified in the course
specification (TQF 3)

Effectiveness
(Use )
Yes

Morals and Ethics

Knowledge

Cognitive Skills

Interpersonal Skills
and Responsibilities

Numerical Analysis,
Communication and
Information
Technology Skills

MUIC TQF 5

Page 2

No

Problems of the teaching

method(s) (if any) and
suggestions

4. Suggestions to improve the teaching method

Section 3: Course Report

1.
2.
3.
4.

Number of students registered

Number of students at the end of the term
Number of student withdrawing the course (W)
Grade distribution
Grade
A
B+
B
C+
C
D+
D
F
Incomplete (I)
Pass (P, S)
Not pass (U)
Withdraw (W)

20
20
-

Students

Percentage

5
8
7

25
40
35

5. Factors causing unusual distribution of grades (If any)

6. Discrepancies in the evaluation plan specified in the Course Specification

6.1. Discrepancy in evaluation time frame No
Discrepancy

Yes (explain)
Reasons

6.2. Discrepancy in evaluation method No Yes (explain)

Discrepancy
MUIC TQF 5

Reasons
Page 3

7. Verification of students achievements

Verification Method

Result

Section 4: Problems and Their Impacts on Course Operation

1. Problems related to teaching and learning resources No

Yes (explain)

Problems

Impacts

2. Problems related to curriculum management and institution No Yes (explain)

Problems

Impacts

Section 5: Course Evaluation

1. Students evaluation (attach document)
Critical comments from students evaluation

Lecturers feedback on the issue

2. Evaluation of the course using other methods

Critical comments from the evaluation

Lecturers feedback on the issue

Section 6: Plan for Improvement

1. Developments from suggestions made in the previous course report
Suggestions/Recommendation from Previous
Course Report

2. Other developments/improvement of the course

MUIC TQF 5

Page 4

Developments

3. Suggestions/recommendations for future course improvement

Recommendation

Timeframe

Responsible Person

4. Suggestions/comments from the course lecturer to the Program Director/Coordinator

Name
Course Lecturer
Program
Director/Coordinator

MUIC TQF 5

Page 5

Date