Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Printed in the UK
Berlin,
Hermann-Fottinger-Institut
fur
Technische Universitat
Stromungsmechanik,
Strae des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany
Received 25 March 1996, accepted for publication 12 June 1996
Abstract. This survey covers recent developments and applications of four
skin-friction measurement techniques (oil-film interferometry, wall hot wire, surface
fence and wall pulsed wire). Comparisons of the techniques with each other and
with other methods are presented. Applications in attached and separated fully
turbulent boundary layers and in highly accelerated laminar-like flows will be shown
to demonstrate the application range and the limits of the various techniques.
1. Introduction
One of the most important results of boundary layer theory
has been the determination of the wall shear stress w , a
quantity which largely determines the energy necessary for
moving the flow of liquids and gases over solid walls.
Knowledge of the wall shear stress is very important
for many technical applications and for the understanding
of all wall-bounded shear flows. Therefore one would
like to know the magnitude (mean and fluctuating value)
and the direction of the skin-friction vector w and its
distribution over a surface. The flow may be compressible
or incompressible, laminar or turbulent and can even
reverse its direction in the vicinity of the wall in an adverse
pressure gradient.
The classical survey on skin friction measurements,
though primarily related to the performance of aircraft, was
written by Winter (1977) and there have been two more
recent review papers by Hanratty and Campbell (1983) and
by Haritonidis (1989). This paper differs from the surveys
mentioned above in that it concentrates on measuring
techniques which have been applied in our laboratory for
some years and on their application to standard and complex
flows. A few other methods will be addressed briefly if they
are used for comparison or promise potential for the future.
The discussion will be confined to incompressible flow
of gases along an aerodynamically smooth wall without heat
transfer. Special emphasis is put on a comparison between
the different techniques and on their range of validity.
For a two-dimensional incompressible laminar boundary layer with zero pressure gradient, Blasius (1907) calculated the skin friction, expressed in dimensionless form as
the skin friction coefficient cf ,
cf =
2w
= 0.664(Rex )1/2
u2
(1)
2[n2
k = 0, 1, 2, . . .
.
sin2 ()]1/2
(2)
(3)
H H Fernholz et al
Table 1. Comparison of the four measuring techniques.
Surface fence
Oil-film interferometry
Measured quantity
Calibration necessary
Mean value
Temporal resolution
Cross correlation
Spatial resolution
1x , 1z (mm)
Direction of w
APG
Pressure difference
Yes
Yes
Unclear
No
Heat transfer
Yes
Yes
> 10 kHz
Yes
Time of flight
Yes
Yes
' 20 Hz
No
Movement of fringes
No
Yes
No
No
< 1, 3
Yes
Yes
1.5, 0.5
Yes
Yes
< 1, 1
Possible
Yes
Reverse Flow
FPG
Transitional flow
Laminar flow
3D flow
Accuracy (estimated)
Yes
Yes (but restricted)
Unclear
Yes
Yes
4%
Yes
Probably yes
Probably yes
Probably yes
Yes
4%
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
< 4%
Surface fence
Oil-film interferometry
the flow on top of it but is only driven by the skinfriction distribution of the flow. In this case the temporal
development of the film height in a two-dimensional flow
is described by
1 ( h2 )
h
=
t
2 x
(4)
(5)
(7)
x
.
t
(9)
(11)
(12)
(13)
= uk
and after rearranging
k +
H H Fernholz et al
Figure 4. The x t diagram showing the development of an oil-film wedge generated in a flow with spatially constant wall
shear stress.
40 C by using
oil = AekT
(14)
u
y
(15)
uy
1/2
+ k2
(16)
2
w
h2
1/2
+ k2
2
.
h2
(17)
(18)
The Preston tube can only measure the mean wall shear
stress. Therefore the calibration function must be timeaveraged. This leads to
m =
e2 A
B
1/
(19)
1401
H H Fernholz et al
"
1/
=1
0
1+ m
m
#1/
(22)
1 2 A
e
B
B
1/
.
(24)
ensures an `+ <
20 up to a skin-friction velocity smaller
(25)
H u
H w
u =
.
(26)
H uH
2
= H+ .
(27)
(29)
(30)
(32)
w2 H 2
.
2
(33)
H2
.
2
(34)
(35)
+
+
1p
.
(36)
w =
2 C2
4 C2
C2
The advantage of equation (36) over Patels (1965)
power law 1p = wn ; n ' 1.5 is that it exhibits also the
correct asymptotic behaviour at the upper and lower ends
of the Reynolds number range, as suggested by dimensional
analysis.
Figure 6 shows a typical calibration curve obtained
using a least square fit based on equation (35). The
agreement between the fitted curve and the calibration
points is better than 1%. Together with the accuracy
of the Preston tube used as a calibration device, the
accuracy of a surface fence is about 4%. As will be
shown in section 3, the accuracy of the mean skin friction
measurement may decrease if the turbulence structure
of the flow under investigation differs strongly from
the turbulence structure of the flow of calibration. An
explanation could be that the the flow field around the fence,
the tubing and the pressure transducer presents a complex
nonlinear system.
It should be noted that Gur (1993) investigated the
applicability of the surface fence to measure fluctuating
values of the wall shear stress by using microphones built
into the probe.
1403
H H Fernholz et al
Table 2. Applications of the measuring techniques.
Type of flow
(authors)
Turbulent boundary layer
(Dengel et al 1987)
Turbulent boundary layer
(Warnack 1996)
Separation and recovery
regions downstream of a
normal plate with a
splitter plate
(Ruderich and Fernholz 1986,
Dengel et al 1987)
Separation and recovery
regions downstream of a
backwards-facing step
(Janke 1993)
Turbulent boundary layer with
and without reverse flow
(Dengel and Fernholz
1989, 1990)
Turbulent boundary layer with
and without reverse flow
(Gasser 1992,
Gasser et al 1993)
Wall
hot
wire
Wall
pulsed
wire
Pressure
gradient
Surface
fence
Oil-film
interferometry
Adverse
Favourable
Adverse
Adverse
Adverse
Adverse
X
X
Preston
tube
Method (v)
Hot
film
Floating
element
balance
Methods (i)(iii)
Figure 7. A comparison of three different measuring techniques for skin friction in an adverse pressure gradient (APG)
axisymmetric boundary layer layer. Data from Dengel et al (1987).
2
3
1
1
1
+B
+C
T
T
T
(37)
(38)
H H Fernholz et al
Figure 10. A comparison of three measuring techniques for skin friction in a wall-bounded turbulent shear layer with strong
reverse flow (xR = 0.38 m). Data from Dengel et al (1987).
Figure 12. The distribution of the pressure coefficient cp , skin-friction coefficient cf and reverse-flow parameter w for three
APG boundary layers. All tagged data (O0 , 0 , 0 ) were measured by a wall-pulsed wire probe. From Dengel and Fernholz
(1990).
Figure 13. A comparison of four measuring techniques for skin friction in an APG-bounded turbulent boundary layer. From
Gasser et al (1993).
H H Fernholz et al
4. Conclusions
Four skin-friction measuring techniques in turbulent wall
bounded shear flows were presented. The techniques have
been developed further, probes were designed and built
and they were used in normal and complex flows. The
range of applicability of these measuring techniques was
investigated and they were compared with each other and
with data from a floating-element balance and from Preston
tubes. The Preston tube was also used to calibrate three of
the four techniques investigated herethe oil-film method
is absolute.
All four techniques can measure the mean skin friction,
wall hot-wire and wall pulsed-wire fluctuating quantities,
and oil-film and wall pulsed-wire skin friction in flows in
which the flow direction reverses. They are all independent
of the validity of the standard logarithmic law of the
wall. The four techniques complement each other and have
ranges in which they overlap, but there are other ranges
within which only one or two may be used.
In complex flows no general rule for an application can
be given but some specific points should be addressed.
1408
Acknowledgment
The authors acknowledge the financial support of the DFG.
References
Alfredsson P H, Johansson A V, Haritonidis J H and Eckelmann
H 1987 The fluctuation wallshear stress and the velocity
field in the viscous sublayer Phys. Fluids A 31 102633
Bechert D W 1995 On the calibration of Preston tubes AIAA J.
34 2056
Bechert D W, Hoppe G and Reif W-E 1985 On the drag
reduction of the shark skin AIAA Paper 85-0546
Bechert D W, Hoppe G, van der Hoeven J G H and Makris R
1992 The Berlin oil channel for drag reduction research
Exp. Fluids 12 25160
Blasius H 1907 Grenzschichten in Flussigkeiten mit kleiner
Reibung Dissertation Gottingen.
Bradbury L J S and Castro I P 1971 A pulsed-wire technique for
velocity measurements in highly turbulent flow J. Fluid
Mech. 22 67987
Bradshaw P and Gregory N 1959 The determination of local
turbulent skin friction from observations in the viscous
sub-layer, Reports and Memoranda 3202, ARC, London
Castro I P 1992 Pulsed-wire anemometry Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
5 77080
Castro I P and Dianat M 1983 Surface flow patterns on
rectangular bodies in thick boundary layers J. Wind. Eng.
Ind. Aero. 11 10719
Castro I P, Dianat M and Bradbury L J S 1987 The pulsed-wire
skin-friction measurement technique Proc. 5th Symp. on
Turbulence and Shear Flows
Dengel P and Fernholz H H 1989 Generation of and
measurements in a turbulent boundary layer with zero skin
friction Advances in Turbulence vol 2, ed H H Fernholz and
H E Fiedler (Berlin: Springer) pp 4327
1990 An experimental investigation of an incompressible
turbulent boundary layer in the vincinity of separation
J. Fluid Mech. 212 61536
Dengel P, Fernholz H H and Hess M 1987 Skin-friction
measurements in two- and three-dimensional highly
turbulent flows with separation Advances in Turbulence
vol 40, ed G Compte-Bellot and J Mathieu (Berlin:
Springer) pp 4709
Dickinson J 1965 The determination of turbulent skin friction
PhD Thesis Laval University Quebec (now at the
Department de Genie Mecanique)
Fernholz H H 1994 Near-wall phenomena in turbulent separated
flows Acta Mechanica 4 5767
der Olfilm-interferometrie
zur Messung von
Wandreibungsfeldern in Luftstromungen Dissertation
Technische Universitat Berlin
Jiang F, Gupta B, Tai Y C and Goodman R 1995 Measurement
of instantaneous turbulent shear stress distribution by
MEMS based sensors Bull. APS 40 12, FC 2
Kempf G 1929 Neue Ergebnisse der Widerstandsforschung
Werft, Reederei, Hafen II 2349
Kim K-S 1989 Skin friction friction measurements by laser
interferometry in supersonic flows PhD Thesis Pennsylvania
State University
1409