Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
This discovery demonstrated that fossils were actually the remains of onceliving animals, and that the rocks of Tuscany were formed in a sea which had once
covered the land. Steno recognized that fossils were actually incorporated in rocks
before they were lithified, and that the deposition of sediments in the sea ultimately
led to the formation of fossil-bearing rock in the layers. The outcome of Stenos
investigations was the development of the principle of superposition.
Steno published the results of his work in 1669 and results can be summarized
in the principle:
1.
2.
3.
Using these three principle, Steno was able to propose a relative chronology for
the layers of strata within the Tuscany area. A chronology is a list of events in the
order in which they occurred.
SUPERPOSITION
The principle of superposition allow us to identity the order in any sequence of
undisturbed sedimentary rock which are stacked in layers one upon another, the
oldest will always be found at the bottom (Figure 3.2).
structures are given in figure3.4 and 3.5, while their application in the field is
illustrared in Box 3.1. On its own the principle of superposition cannot resolve the
chronology of complex geological areas, in which the rocks are, for example, not
simply in horizontal layers. In such areas geologist require more sophisticated tools
with which to establish the relative chronology of both rock units and geological
events. The most important of these tools are cross-cutting relationships and
unconformities. Before looking, however, at each of these tools in detail we shall first
look at the development of these ideas by early geologist.
First, at Glen tilt, in the Cairngorm Mountains of Schotland, Hutton noted that
granite appeared to penetrate the surrounding metamorphic schists in a series of viens
(Figure 3.6). He concluded that the granite must have been in a molten statesfor itto
have forced its way into the schist in this way. Hutton made two interferences from
this conclusion; 1) granite is not prcipitated from water as suggested by Werner and
his contemporaries, but it is formed by cooling of molten rock and (2) that the granite
must by younger then the schist into which it was forced as fluid mass. The second of
these interferences is an example of a cross-cutting relationship and is important in
determining the relative chronology of geological events as we shall see in the next
section.
of the biblical occured more than once in the geological record. At Siccar point,
Hutton observed two bodies of strata apparently at tight angles to each other. The
older shale strata were arranged so that the beds were almost vertical, while the
younger overlying sandstone strata lay almost horizontally on top of the vertical beds
(Figure 3.7)in view of the fact that the two units did not conform to the normal
pattern of on horizontal layer on top of another the relationship was termed an
unconformity. Importantly fragments of the older strata were laid down originally on
a horizontal plane, as Steno had taught, then the underlying sequence must have
undergone a cycle of deposition, tilting and erosion, before the overlying rocks,
which incorporated blocks of the older4 strata, were then deposited on top. As John
Play fair (1742-1819), once of Huttons contemporaries, put it in 1892, what clearer
evidence could we have had of the different formation of these observation: (1) that
there had been several periods of deformation, uplift and erosion, not one as
suggested by Werner and (2) the Earth must be of much greater antiquity than the
prediction made from the Bible to allow sufficient for this to occur.
Third the uplifted and folded rocks were subject to erosion and the landscape
was dissected and lowered. Finally, a rise in sea level flooded his eroded landscape
and a new sequence of sedimentary rocks was deposited horizontally above the olde
deformed sequence.
The three other types of unconformity are more subtle. A disconformity occurs
where the unit above and below the plane of unconformity have the same angle of
dip, but are separated by surface which has undergone erosion (Figure 3.9). Here, the
older sequence of rocks has not been folded, but has been subject to erosion before
the deposition of the younger rocks above the erosion surface. This type of
unconformity may occur because of a fall in sea level rise leads to the deposition of
new sedimentary rock on top the erosion surface. The erosion surface represent a
break or time gap in sedimentation. A classic example of disconformity is seen in the
Hampshire and London Basins of southern England. Here an eroded and potholed
Cretaceous Calk and the younger Eocene sediments above (Figure 3.11).
Where bedded sediments overlie an exposed and eroded crystalline basement, the
term nonconformity is used (Figure 3.9). Often this is indicative of a landscape
formed by the erosion of intensely deformed and metamorphosed rocks produced
during continental collision, although it can be produced when a large igneous
intrusion is exposed by erosion. Deposition of horizontally layered sedimentary
rocks, during a rise in sea level, or by river system, produced the nonconformity. In
Britain a good example of this is the deposition of the Torridonian red sanstones of
the late Protrozoic on top on the much older, dissected ancient land surface of the
crystalline Lewisian basement, in north-west Scotland.
Linking all of the unconformities discussed so far is the fact that each is
cracterised by evidence of erosion during which time there was no deposition within
the area. Consequently the erosional surface represents a time break within the
sedimentary sequence. In many cases, fragments may be eroded out of the underling
sequence and re-incorporated or reworked into the covering rocks. However, we can
also recognize an unconformity, or time break, where there has been little or no
erosion, but where the net rate of sedimentation has matched the net rate of sediment
loss and consequently there is no sedimentary record of the time period in question.
This type of unconformity is known as a paraconformity, or is sometimes called a
diastem, where the gap is a small one. In these cases the sedimentary sequence is not
exposed to subaerial erosion.
The gaps produced in the sedimentary recorded by non-deposition can be of
many different orders of magnitude, representing a few hours, years or even millions
of years. The length of time represented by such gap can only be determined by
recourse independent means of dating. Some geologist believe that most of the
stratigraphical record is rather like a net-a series of holes held together by string-and
that each bedding plane is in fact a period of time when there was no deposition and
is therefore a gap in the geological record. Attempts have been made to quantify the
completeness of the stratigrphical record. It is important to realize that record is
imperfect, even in deep ocean basins where there are few bottom current to cause
erosion and where sedimentation is usually continous.
REFERENCES
Peter Doyle, Matthew R.Bennet and Alistair N. Baxter. 1993. The Key To Earth
History. Willey. London. Hal. 13 26.