Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
to other bearer paper. the above proposed amendment shall remove the conflict that may arise
between section 40 and 342.
The proposed amendment will have the effect of clarifying that the subsequent special
indorsement of an instrument originally drawn to bearer shall not control its future
negotiation. Such modification shall also result to a proportioned relationship between
instrument originally payable to bearer and instrument originally drawn or payable to order
indoresed in blank.
Another proposed amendment would be for sec. 1683 which provides the time a check
must be presented. It is submitted bby the authors that the provision should allow electronic
1 Section 40" Indorsement of instrument payable to bearer. - Where an instrument, payable to bearer, is
indorsed specially, it may nevertheless be further negotiated by delivery; but the person indorsing specially is liable
as indorser to only such holders as make title through his indorsement. "
2 Section 34 provides that a special indorsement specifies the person to whom, or to whose order, the
instrument is to be payable, and the indorsement of such indorsee is necessary to the further negotiation
of the instrument
3 Sec. 186. Within what time a check must be presented.A check must be presented for payment within a
reasonable time after its issue or the drawer will be discharged from liability thereon to the extent of the loss
caused by the delay.
"Submission of negotiable instruments such as bank checks should be done personally by the
holder or by some person authorized to receive payment on his behalf, in a proper place and during
banking hours.
copies or transfers of check that will be sufficient basis for clearing. The rationale considered of
course is that in todays generation, electronic transfers will
ppaper are of the view that the consideration should clearly be stated in relation to the
presumption is the cause or vinculum juris with respect to the maker or drawer, the person who
issued the instrument in order to Know eactly whether or not the consideration as to the
maker/drawer who issued and the cause with respect to the payee and subsequent holders pertain
to a single consideration. If in case it pertains to the same cause, it runs in conflict with the
provisions of the Civil Code particularly on Sales and Obligations and Contracts. Under the Civil
Code on Sales and Obligations and Contracts, the cause or consideration is coherent depending
n on the party. The cause for which the vendor or obligee entered into a contract is different for
the vendee or obligor.
4 Sec. 24. Presumption of consideration. Every negotiable instrument is deemed prima facie to have
been issued for a valuable consideration; and every person whose signature appears thereon to have become a
party thereto for value.
The third proposal would be on rights of a purchaser after maturity which should
be given be given against an accommodation signer.