Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Name of
Student
Sr. No.
1.
2.
3.
Roll No.
MD. SHAYAN
KHAN
REVANT
MIGLANI
NANKI
SEKHON
Signature
2K12/CE/075
Sr. No.
Supervisor/Joint
Supervisor
Designation
of The
Supervisor
Assistant
professor
2K12/CE/097
2K12/CE/078
4.
PRAVEER
KUMAR
2K12/CE/089
5.
VIJAY
BISHNOI
2K12/CE/120
Certificate
Approval of
the
Supervisor
Signature of
the
Supervisor/s
ABSTRACT
Introduction
1.1 General:-
CHAPTER: 1
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
2.1 General
1.4 Project:The project envisaged by PWD is regarding the extra
widening of Wazirabad-Mukarba chowk corridor. The
corridor is to be widened by 45m from the centre line
along a stretch of approximately 9 km.
CHAPTER: 2
Dynamic
Soaking
3. Period of Soaking:
96 hours
5 Kg
19.625
2.6 Analysis
a) Analysis for Mould 1
3.2 Procedure
1. Measure the height (h) and internal diameter (d) of the
core cutter and apply grease to the inside of the core cutter
2. Weigh the empty core cutter.
3. Clean and level the place where density is to be
determined.
4. Drive the core cutter, with a steel dolly on its top, into
the soil to its full depth with the help of a steel rammer.
c)
5. Excavate the soil around the cutter with a crow bar and
gently lift the cutter without disturbing the soil in it.
6. Trim the top and bottom surfaces of the sample and
clean the outside surface of the cutter.
7. Weigh the core cutter with soil.
8. Remove the soil from the core cutter, using a sample
ejector and take representative soil sample from it to
determine the moisture content.
CHAPTER: 3
Core Cutter Method
3.1 General:The Core Cutter method is a field test to determine the dry
density of soil. The in-situ density of soil is required for
stability analysis, for the determination of the degree of
compaction of compacted soil, etc. The core-cutter
3.3 Observations
3.4 Calculations
1) Dry Density of Sample(W6=((W5/100+MC))*100)=
1.79g/cc
2) Compaction(W7=W6/ MDD) =92.6%
down. The sand will freely run down till it fills the
conical portion. When there is no further downward
movement of sand in the SPC, close the slit.
d) Find the weight of the SPC along with the sand
remaining after filling the cone (W2)
e) Place the SPC concentrically on top of the calibrating
can. Open the slit to allow the sand to run down until
the sand flow stops by itself. This operation will fill
the calibrating can and the conical portion of the SPC.
Now close the slit and find the weight of the SPC
with the remaining sand (W3)
f) The values such as deflection etc. Were noted down
in EXCEL one by one and then with the help of the
EXCEL. We were able to make out the graphs and do
a quantitative study.
STAGE2: MEASUREMENT OF SOIL DENSITY
a)
3.5 Analysis
The subgrade must be compacted upto 97% . So, more
compaction is required . Compaction can be done with the
help of rollers.
b)
c)
d)
CHAPTER: 4
Sand Replacement Method
e)
f)
4.2 Procedure
STAGE1: CALIBERATION OF SAND DENSITY
a)
g)
h)
5) Dry density(W8=W7/(100+MC))100)=2.182g/cc
6)
4.5 Analysis
A good subgrade must have a compaction of not less
than 97%. So, for use the sub grade must be compacted
again till a compaction of 97% is achieved. Compaction
can be done with the help of rollers. Vibrating rollers are
more effective for compaction.
CONCLUSION
This paper introduces different methods to find out the dry
density of soil in-situ. The variation in usage of method
depends on the soil present in the subgrade. The amount
of water to be added for making mix for the pavement
should be greater than OMC by 1% to 2% to compensate
the loss in water due to evaporation etc. Highly compacted
subgrade is used in the design of pavements.
4.3 Observations
1) Optimum Moisture Content for Sand= 6.5%
2) Mass of Pouring Cylinder+
Sand before Pouring (W1)
=15000g
3) Mass of Pouring Cylinder+Sand after Pouring
(W2)
=10920g
(MC)
=1208g
= 1.405 g/cc
= 5%
=2.35g/cc
4.4 Calculations
1)
2)
3)
4)
Pavement Use:
Problem Type:
Design Input Summary
Climate:
Design Traffic
(ESAL):
Subgrade Mr (MPa):
Design Traffic Details
Design Life (years):
General Roadway
Pavement Extension
35 C
139,652
51.5
25
Strength Percentile
Design Strength
Percentile:
Individual
CBR
CBR Values
10.49
N/A
Mr
52
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We are thankful to our mentor, Mr. B.R.G Robert
(Assistant Professor) for guiding us throughout the
project work and for introducing us to the staff of CEC
working on the Extra widening project.
We would also like to thank Mr. Suraj (site engineer)
who helped us to perform the experiments and to gain a
better understanding about the pavement design.
REFERENCES
1) Indian Standard Code 2720 Part-28
2) Indian Standard Code 2720 Part-29
3) HIGHWAY ENGINEERING 9th Edition
by Khanna and Justo
4) Wikipedia.org