Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1
Arithmetic Mean:-
Index
or
dividing the sum of the values by the number of items. Algebraically we can have the
formula as under:
a) For individual observations
x +x +x +.......+ xn
x
X = 1 2 3 N
=
N
P A Z A R E
P A
P A
N I L E S H
P A Z A R E
X =
8+9+18+21+25+31
6
x
N
= 112
= 18.6666
X =
N I LImportant
ETip S H
Arithmetic Mean is the most widely used measurement which represents the
entire data. Generally it is temed as an Average to a layman. It is the quantity obtained by
dividing the sum of the values of the items in a variable by their number. It is denoted by a
symbol X. Arithmetic mean by be either:
(i) Simple Arithmetic Mean :- The simple arithmetic mean is the quotient obtained by
-- 01
-- 10
-- 15
-- 16
-- 19
-- 21
-- 27
-- 33
-- 35
-- 40
-- 48
-- 61
-- 76
Mean
Median
Mode
Mean Deviation
Quartile Deviation
Standard Devaition
Coefficient of Correlation
Rank Correlation Coefficient
Regression
Trend Value
Linear Programming : Graphic method
LPP : Transportation Method (NWM, LCM, VAM)
LPP : Assignment Problem
01)
02)
03)
04)
05)
06)
07)
08)
09)
10)
11)
12)
13)
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
x
N
X = 1+2+3+6+8+9+12+14+16
9
x
N
= 71 =
9
X =
7.8888
Ex : Find out the Simple Arithmetic Mean For Discrete Series by direct method
Income
No. of Families
10
5
20
7
30
2
N = f
40
3
50
1
60
6
70
9
fx
10x5 = 50
20x7 = 140
30x2 = 60
40x3 = 120
50x1 = 50
60x6 = 360
70x9 = 630
fx = 1410
P A Z A R E
P A
d=x - A
27-37= -10
32-37 = -5
37-37= 0
42-37= 5
47-37 = 10
52 - 37 = 15
d = 15
Since A = 32
X = A + d
N
X = 32 + 45
6
= 32 + 7.5
X = 39.5
d=x - A
27-42= -15
32-42= -10
37-42 = -5
42-42= 0
47-42= 5
52-42= 10
d = -15
Since A = 42
X = A + d
N
X = A + (-15)
6
X = 42 - 2.5
X = 39.5
d=x - A
27-32= -5
32-32 = -0
37-32= 5
42-32= 10
47-32 = 15
52 - 32 = 20
d = 45
(Tip:- From above example, you observed that any value of assumed mean taken the
arithmetic mean answer is comes same. So did not confuse and assume any value as
assumed mean (A), i.e. from given example and solve the example.)
X =
x
27
32
37
42
47
52
f.Xm
82.5+58+50+84+42.5+26+9
352
=
= 32
= 11
N
5+4+4+8+5+4+2
Arithmetic Mean for Continous series by direct method (X) =11
f . Xm
16.5 x 5 = 82.5
14.5 x 4 = 58
12.5 x 4 = 50
10.5 x 8 = 84
8.5 x 5 = 42.5
6.5 x 4 = 26
4.5 x 2 = 9
f.Xm = 82.5+58+50+84+42.5+26+9 = 352
N I L E S H
Xm
16.5
14.5
12.5
10.5
8.5
6.5
4.5
P A
P A Z A R E
Ex:- Find out the Simple Arithmetic Mean For Continous Series by direct method
f . Xm
X =
N
Here,
f = Frequency,
Xm = mid value,
N = f
f
5
4
4
8
5
4
2
N=32
fd
N
= 42.7272
C.I.
16 - 17
14 - 15
12 - 13
10 - 11
8-9
6-7
4-5
50+140+60+120+50+360+630
= 1410
5+7+2+3+1+6+9
33
A +
N I L E S H
X = fx =
X =
No. of Families
f
5
7
2
3
1
6
9
N = f = 33
Income
x
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Ans :-
Ex:-
x = variable,
If the number of items is large and values of variable big in size, a short cut
method of computing x is adopted. This method is based on the following property of the
arithmetic average, The algebric sum of the devations of values of variable from their
mean is always to Zero.
Let us assume the difference figure A as assumed mean. Take deviations of
values of variable from the assumed mean denoted as d. Obtain the sum of these
devations denote as d. Substitute the values of these symbols in the short-cut formula
as under.
X =
A + d
............. for individual observations
N
f = Frequency,
Here,
fx
N
X =
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
N I L E S H
=
30
510
90
N I L E S H
X = A + fd x
c
N
(Note:- c the common factor or width of the class interval is used for dividing and
multiplying)
P A Z A R E
Ex (1):- 90-99
2
Xm
94.5
84.5
74.5
64.5
54.5
44.5
34.5
24.5
d = 94.5 - 54.5 = 40
10
10
60-69
17
d= (Xm-A)/c
(94.5-54.5)/10= 4
(84.5-54.5)/10= 3
(74.5-54.5)/10= 2
(64.5-54.5)/10= 1
(54.5-54.5)/10= 0
(44.5-54.5)/10= -1
(34.5-54.5)/10= -2
(24.5-54.5)/10= -3
=4 ,
d =
50-59
20
40-49
9
fd
2*4= 8
9*3= 27
12*2= 24
17*1= 17
20*0= 0
9*-1= -9
6*-2= -12
5*-3= -15
fd = 40
84.5 - 54.5
10
30-39
6
20-29
5
f
2
9
12
17
20
9
6
5
N=80
70-79
12
30
10
= 3
= 10.5 + 0.5 = 11
Same as remaining values of d are finds.
C.I.
90-99
80-89
70-79
60-69
50-59
40-49
30-39
20-29
80-89
9
16
32
10.5 +
f.d
5 * 6 = 30
4 * 4 = 16
4*2=8
8*0=0
5 * -2 = -10
4 * -4 = -16
2 * -6 = -12
fd = 16
d=Xm- A
16.5-10.5= 6
14.5-10.5= 4
12.5-10.5= 2
10.5-10.5= 0
8.5-10.5= -2
6.5-10.5= -4
4.5-10.5= -6
X = A + fd
N
Xm
(16+17)/2= 33/2 = 16.5
(14+15)/2= 29/2 = 14.5
(12+13)/2= 25/2 = 12.5
(10+11)/2= 21/2 = 10.5
(8+9)/2= 17/2 = 8.5
(6+7)/2= 13/2 = 6.5
(4+5)/2= 9/2 = 4.5
ment to the short cut method. Under this method, the devations are devided by a single
common factor to reduce the figures to the minimum size. It is, in a way, a deliberate error
and it is compensated by multiplying the quotient. The adjusted or reduced value of d in
now termed as d so the formula stands as under.
f
5
4
4
8
5
4
2
N=32
The Step Deviation Method:- The step deviation method is the only additional adjust-
(Tip :- From above example, it observed that you will solve any taking assumed mean
from given example and solve it and answer comes as same.)
Ex (3) :C.I.
16-17
14-15
12-13
10-11
8-9
6-7
4-5
f.d
5 * 4 = 20
4*2=8
4*0=0
8 * -2 = -16
5 * -4 = -20
4 * -6 = -24
2 * -8 = -16
fd = -48
P A
P A Z A R E
X = A + fd
N
d=Xm- A
16.5-12.5= 4
14.5-12.5= 2
12.5-12.5= 0
10.5-12.5= -2
8.5-12.5= -4
6.5-12.5= -6
4.5-12.5= -8
f.d
7 * -20= -140
11 * -10= -110
31 * 00= 0
17 * 10= 170
16 * 20= 320
5 * 30= 150
3 * 40= 120
fd = -140-110+0+170+320+150+120 = 510
OR
Xm
(16+17)/2= 33/2 = 16.5
(14+15)/2= 29/2 = 14.5
(12+13)/2= 25/2 = 12.5
(10+11)/2= 21/2 = 10.5
(8+9)/2= 17/2 = 8.5
(6+7)/2= 13/2 = 6.5
(4+5)/2= 9/2 = 4.5
d= x-A
10-30= -20
20-30= -10
30-30= 0
40-30= 10
50-30= 20
60-30= 30
70-30= 40
P A
f
7
11
31
17
16
5
3
N=90
x
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
OR
f
5
4
4
8
5
4
2
N=32
C.I.
16-17
14-15
12-13
10-11
8-9
6-7
4-5
40
70
3
60
5
X = A + fd
N
50
16
d= x-A
10-40= -30
20-40= -20
30-40= -10
40-40= 0
50-40= 10
60-40= 20
70-40= 30
40
17
x
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
f
7
11
31
17
16
5
3
N=90
30
31
20
11
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
Ex (2):- 10
7
Since, N=80, A = 54.5, fd = 40, c = 10, then put the values on formula
54.5 + 5 =
59.5
27-31
8
32-36
7
37-41
2
59.5
42-46
4
Xm
14.5
12.5
10.5
8.5
6.5
4.5
d= (Xm-A)/c
(14.5-8.5)/2= 3
(12.5-8.5)/2= 2
(10.5-8.5)/2= 1
(8.5-8.5)/2= 0
(6.5-8.5)/2= -1
(4.5-8.5)/2= -2
fd
3*3=9
8 * 2 = 16
15 * 1 = 15
20 * 0 = 0
10 * -1 = -10
4 * -2 = -8
fd = 22
P A Z A R E
22
60
x 2
C.I.
14-15
12-13
10-11
8-9
6-7
4-5
f
3
8
15
20
10
4
N=60
Xm
14.5
12.5
10.5
8.5
6.5
4.5
d= (Xm-A)/c
(14.5-10.5)/2= 2
(12.5-10.5)/2= 1
(10.5-10.5)/2= 0
(8.5-10.5)/2= -1
(6.5-10.5)/2= -2
(4.5-10.5)/2= -3
X = 10.5 + (-38) x 2
60
fd
3*2=6
8*1=8
15 * 0 = 0
20 * -1 = -20
10 * -2 = -20
4 * -3 = -12
fd = -38
14-15
3
Q: How to find the value C
(-8) x 5
35
X = 29 +
fd
x c
N
= 29 + (-0.2286 * 5) = 29 - 1.1429 = 27.8571
12-13
8
-8
f
3
8
15
20
10
4
N=60
X = 8.5 +
So the common factor (c)
value is 5
fd = 12 + 4 + 7 + 0 -4 - 10 - 9 - 8 =
fd
4 * 3 = 12
2*2=4
7*1=7
8*0=0
4 * -1 = -4
5 * -2 = -10
3 * -3 = -9
2 * -4 = -8
fd = -8
10-11
15
d= (Xm-A)/c
(44-29)/5= 3
(39-29)/5= 2
(34-29)/5= 1
(29-29)/5= 0
(24-29)/5= -1
(19-29)/5= -2
(14-29)/5= -3
(9-29)/5= -4
Xm
44
39
34
29
24
19
14
9
8-9
20
N I L E S H
f
4
2
7
8
4
5
3
2
N=35
C.I.
14-15
12-13
10-11
8-9
6-7
4-5
6-7
10
(Tip :- From above example, it observed that you will solve any taking assumed mean
from given example and solve it and answer comes as same.)
27.86
P A
P A Z A R E
Ex (3): - 4-5
4
22-26
4
27 x 5
= 24 + (0.7714 * 5) = 24 + 3.8571 = 27.8571= 27.86
35
(Tip :- From above example, it observed that you will solve any taking assumed mean
from given example and solve it and answer comes as same.)
X = 24 +
17-21
5
44.5 + 15 =
P A
C.I.
42-46
37-41
32-36
27-31
22-26
17-21
12-16
7-11
12-16
3
fd
4 * 4 = 16
2*3=6
7 * 2 = 14
8*1=8
4*0=0
5 * -1 = -5
3 * -2 = -6
2 * -3 = -6
fd = 27
Ex (2): - 7-11
2
= 44.5 + 1.5 * 10
N I L E S H
X = 44.5 + 120 x 10
80
d= (Xm-A)/c
(44-24)/5= 4
(39-24)/5= 3
(34-24)/5= 2
(29-24)/5= 1
(24-24)/5= 0
(19-24)/5= -1
(14-24)/5= -2
(9-24)/5= -3
fd
2 * 5 = 10
9 * 4 = 36
12 * 3 = 36
17 * 2 = 34
20 * 1 = 20
9*0=0
6 * -1 = -6
5 * -2 = -10
fd = 120
5
4
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
Xm
44
39
34
29
24
19
14
9
d= (Xm-A)/c
(94.5-44.5)/10=
(84.5-44.5)/10=
(74.5-44.5)/10=
(64.5-44.5)/10=
(54.5-44.5)/10=
(44.5-44.5)/10=
(34.5-44.5)/10=
(24.5-44.5)/10=
Xm
94.5
84.5
74.5
64.5
54.5
44.5
34.5
24.5
f
2
9
12
17
20
9
6
5
N=80
f
4
2
7
8
4
5
3
2
N=35
C.I.
90-99
80-89
70-79
60-69
50-59
40-49
30-39
20-29
C.I.
42-46
37-41
32-36
27-31
22-26
17-21
12-16
7-11
fd
X = A+
x c
N
X = 54.5 + 40 x 10 = 54.5 + 0.5 * 10
80
OR
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
79.60
Ex (7):- You are given the following incomplete information and its mean 25. find out the
missing frequencies.
Class interval (x):
0-10
10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50
Total
Frequencies (f):
5
15
5
= 45
Soln:So,
Assume that the frequencies are A and B. Total frequencies are 45.
x
00-10
10-20
20-30
30-40
40-50
f
5
A
15
20-A
5
N=45
Xm
(10+0)/2=10/2=5
(10+20)/2=30/2=15
(20+30)/2=50/2=25
(30+40)/2=70/2=35
(40+50)/2=90/2=45
fx
5 * 5 = 25
A * 15 = 15A
15 * 25 = 375
(20-A)*35 = 700-35 A
5 * 45 = 225
fx = 1325 - 20 A
fx =25+15A+375+700-20A+225=1325-35A+15A = 1325-20A
5+A+15+B+5= 45
A + B + 25 = 45
A + B = 45 - 25
A + B = 20
B = 20 - A
79.60 * 25
1990
10A
10A
A = 50/10
A=5
2040 - 10A
25
= 2040 - 10A
= 2040 - 10A
= 2040 - 1990
= 50
= 5
=
fx
50*1 = 50
60*3 = 180
70*A = 70 A
80*(12-A) = 960-80 A
90*6 = 540
100*2 = 200
110*1 = 110
fx = 2040 - 10 A
f
1
3
(A)
12-A
6
2
1
N=25
P A Z A R E
9906 - 14A
100
115.86*100 = 9906 - 14A
11586 = 9906 - 14A
14A = 11586 - 9906
14A = 1680
A = 1680 = 120
14
A = 120
115.86
x
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
fx
N
N I L E S H
f
fx
25
110*25 = 2750
17
112*17 = 1904
13
113*13= 1469
15
117*15 = 1755
14
A*14 = 14A
8
125*8 = 1000
6
128*6 = 768
2
130*2 = 260
N=100
fx = 9906 + 14A
So, missing value is 120.
Assume that the missing frequencies are A and B . Total frequencies are 25.
1 + 3 + A + B + 6 + 2 + 1 = 25
13 + A + B = 25
fx
A + B = 25 - 13
X =
N
A + B = 12,
B = 12 - A
X =
P A
P A
Soln:So,
x
110
112
113
117
A
125
128
130
P A Z A R E
Ex (5):- If the average wages paid to 25 workers is Rs. 79.60, find the missing frequencies.
Wages(Rs.) (x):
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
No.of workers (f):
1
3
(?)
(?)
6
2
1
Soln:-
N I L E S H
Ex (6):- From the following data calcuate the missing value when the mean is 115.86.
Wages(Rs.) (x): 110
112
113
117
(?)
125
128
130
No.of workers (f): 25
17
13
15
14
8
6
2
678 + 14A
43 + A
(43+A)* 15.25 =
678 + 14A
655.75 + 15.25A =
678 + 14A
15.25A - 14A =
678 - 655.75
1.25A =
22.25
22.25
A =
= 17.8
1.25
Therefore, the missing frequency equal to 17.8 or 18 approximately.
15.25 =
2040 - 10A
25
= 2040 - 10A
= 2040 - 10A
= 2040 - 1990
= 50
= 5
=
fx
N
79.60
X =
fx
10*3 = 30
12*7 = 84
14*A = 14A
16*20 = 320
16*8 = 144
20*5 = 100
fx = 678+14A
f
3
7
(A)
20
8
5
N=43+A
x
10
12
14
16
18
20
Ex (4): - Find the missing frequency from the following distribution if its mean is 15.25.
x:
10
12
14
16
18
20
f:
3
7
(?)
20
8
5
Soln:Let us assume the missing frequency as A
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
OR
N=5+A+15+B+5
45 = 25 + A + B
45 - 25 = A + B
A + B = 20 ----- (1)
(1)
A + B = 20
multiply by 35 to eqn (1)
(2) 15A +35B = 500
fx =305+1152+67A+70B+584=2041+67A+70B
2041+67A+70B
100
67.45 * 100 = 2041+67A+70B
6745
= 2041+67A+70B
6745 -2041 = 67A + 70 B
67A+70B = 4704 ------ (2)
70A + 70 B
_ 67A
70 B
3A
A = 126 / 3
=
=
=
=
4830
4704
126
42
P A Z A R E
42 + B = 69,
B = 69 - 42,
B = 27
f
2
4
5
10
6
9
7
N=43
Xm
64.5
54.5
44.5
34.5
24.5
14.5
4.5
d= (Xm-A)/c
(64.5-34.5)/10= 3
(54.5-34.5)/10= 2
(44.5-34.5)/10= 1
(34.5-34.5)/10= 0
(24.5-34.5)/10= -1
(14.5-34.5)/10= -2
(4.5-34.5)/10= -3
30-39
10
20-29
6
fd
2*3=6
4*2=8
5*1=5
10 * 0 = 0
6 * -1 = -6
9 * -2 = -18
7 * -3 = -21
fd = -26
10-19
9
0-9
7
Total
= 43
N I L E S H
(Tip :- From above example, it observed that you will solve the example both method
and answer comes as same, so student can deside which method is easy to solve.)
(1)
A + B = 69
multiply by 70 to eqn (1)
(2) 67A +70B = 4704
N=5+18+A+B+8
100 = 31 + A + B
100 - 31 = A + B
A + B = 69 ----- (1)
A + B = 20,
10 + B = 20,
B = 20 - 10,
B = 10
= 700
= 500
= 200
= 10
35A + 35 B
_ 15A 35 B
20 A
A = 200 / 20
fx
5 * 61 = 305
18 * 64 = 1152
A * 67 = 67A
B * 70 = 70B
8 * 73 = 584
fx = 2041+67A+70B
P A
P A
fx =25+15A+375+35B+225=625+15A+35B
P A Z A R E
25 = 625+15A+35B
45
25 * 45 = 625+15A+35B
1125
= 625+15A+35B
15A+35B = 1125-625
15A+35B = 500 ------ (2)
A + B = 69 ------ (1)
67.45 =
fx
5 * 5 = 25
A * 15 = 15A
15 * 25 = 375
B*35 = 35 B
5 * 45 = 225
fx = 625+15A+35B
N I L E S H
A + B = 20 ------ (1)
Xm
(60+62)/2=122/2=61
(63+65)/2=128/2=64
(66+68)/2=134/2=67
(69+71)/2=140/2=70
(72+74)/2=146/2=73
Xm
(10+0)/2=10/2=5
(10+20)/2=30/2=15
(20+30)/2=50/2=25
(30+40)/2=70/2=35
(40+50)/2=90/2=45
f
5
18
A
B
8
N=100
f
5
A
15
B
5
N=45
C.I.
00-10
10-20
20-30
30-40
40-50
C.I.
60-62
63-65
66-68
69-71
72-74
Assume that the frequencies are A and B. Total frequencies are 100.
Soln:-
Put A = 10 on eqn A + B = 20
A + B = 20
10 + B = 20
B = 20 - 10
B = 10
25 * 45
1125
20 A
20 A
1325 - 20A
45
= 1325 - 20 A
= 1325 - 20 A
= 1325 - 1125
= 200
200
=
= 10
20
= 10
25 =
fx
N
Ex (8):- Find out the missing frequencies from the following data, if the Mean of it 67.45.
Height (x):
60-62 63-65 66-68 69-71 72-74
Total
No of Student (f):
5
18
8
= 100
X =
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
Since, N=43, A = 34.5, fd = -26, c = 10, then put the values on formula
90-99
1
21-40
5
f.d
4* -15= -60
5* -10= -50
9* -5= -45
15* 0=0
10* 5=50
7* 10=70
fd = -35
P A Z A R E
fx
N
965
X =
50
X = 19.3
fd
N
-35
X = 20 +
50
X = 20 - 0.7 = 19.3
X =
X = A +
(Tip:- Observe the above example, by using both the method i.e. Direct as will as
Short cut method, the answer will be same i.e. 19.3 , So student can be solve the
example any method.)
c) x:
f:
Ans:-
80-84
2
75-79
0
70-74
10
65-59
17
60-64
24
55-59
19
50-54
7
45-49
4
40-44
1
Above example solve by both the methods i.e. direct as will as short cut method.
Since, N=50, A = 70.5, fd = -12, c = 20, then put the values on formula
fd
X = A+
x c
N
(-12)
X = 70.5 +
x 20 = 70.5 + (-0.24 * 20) = 70.5 - 4.8 = 65.70
50
fd
4 * -3 = -12
5 * -2 = -10
8 * -1 = -8
20 * 0 = 0
9*1=9
3*2=6
1*3=3
fd = -12
1-20
4
x
5
10
15
20
25
30
d= (Xm-A)/c
(10.5-70.5)/20= -3
(30.5-70.5)/20= -2
(50.5-70.5)/20= -1
(70.5-70.5)/20= 0
(90.5-70.5)/20= 1
(110.5-70.5)/20= 2
(130.5-70.5)/20= 3
41-60
8
30
7
Xm
10.5
30.5
50.5
70.5
90.5
110.5
130.5
61-80
20
25
10
P A
f
4
5
8
20
9
3
1
N=50
81-100
9
C.I.
1-20
21-40
41-60
61-80
81-100
101-120
121-140
101-120
3
121-140
1
20
15
N I L E S H
Direct Method
f
fx
4
5*4=20
5
10*5=50
9
15*9=135
15
20*15=300
10
25*10=250
7
30*7=210
N=f =50
fx = 965
Ex (11): -
15
9
P A Z A R E
x
5
10
15
20
25
30
10
5
N I L E S H
5
4
(Tip:- Observe the above example, by using both the method i.e. Direct as will as
Short cut method, the answer will be same i.e. 89.33 , So student can be solve the
example any method.)
b) x:
f:
Ans:-
Since, N=50, A = 54.5, fd = -36, c = 10, then put the values on formula
fd
X = A+
x c
N
(-36)
X = 54.5 +
x 10 = 54.5 + (-0.72 * 10) = 54.5 - 7.2 = 47.30
50
fd
5 * -4 = -20
6 * -3 = -18
7 * -2 = -14
8 * -1 = -8
11 * 0 = 0
6*1=6
4*2=8
2*3=6
1*4=4
fd = -36
80-89
2
70-79
4
P A
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
60-69
6
d= (Xm-A)/c
(14.5-54.5)/10=
(24.5-54.5)/10=
(34.5-54.5)/10=
(44.5-54.5)/10=
(54.5-54.5)/10=
(64.5-54.5)/10=
(74.5-54.5)/10=
(84.5-54.5)/10=
(94.5-54.5)/10=
50-59
11
Xm
14.5
24.5
34.5
44.5
54.5
64.5
74.5
84.5
94.5
40-49
8
f
5
6
7
8
11
6
4
2
1
N=50
30-39
7
C.I.
10-19
20-29
30-39
40-49
50-59
60-69
70-79
80-89
90-99
20-29
6
Ex (10): -10-19
5
fd
X = A+
x c
N
X = 34.5 + (-26) x 10 = 34.5 + (-0.6046 * 10) = 34.5 - 6.0465 =28.4534 = 28.45
43
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
Direct Method
X =
P A Z A R E
Formula
fd
x c
N
Xm d=Xm- A
18.5
6
16.5
4
14.5
2
12.5 0
10.5
-2
8.5
-4
f.d
3*6 = 18
8*4 = 32
15*2 = 30
20*0 = 0
10* -2= -20
4 * -4 = -16
fd = 44
X =
X =
X =
fXm
N
794
60
13.2333
13.23
fd
N
44
X = 12.5 +
60
X
= 12.5 + 0.7333 = 13.2333
X
= 13.23
X = A+
P A Z A R E
f
3
8
15
20
10
4
N=60
d= (Xm-A)/c
(18.5-14.5)/2 = 2
(16.5-14.5)/2 = 1
(14.5-14.5)/2 = 0
(12.5-14.5)/2 = -1
(10.5-14.5)/2 = -2
(8.5-14.5)/2 = -3
fd
3*2=6
8*1=8
15 * 0 = 0
20 * -1 = -20
10 * -2 = -20
4 * -3 = -12
fd = -38
Formula
X = A+
fd
x c
N
(-38)
x 2 = 14.5 + (-0.6333 * 2) = 14.5 - 1.2666 = 13.2333 = 13.23
60
(Tip:- Observe the above example, by using Direct , Short cut as will as The Step
Deviation method, the answer will be same i.e. 61.76 , So student can be solve the
example any method.)
(Tip:- Observe the above example, by using Direct , Short cut as will as The Step
Deviation method, the answer will be same i.e. 13.23 , So student can be solve the
example any method.)
X = 14.5 +
Xm
18.5
16.5
14.5
12.5
10.5
8.5
f
3
8
15
20
10
4
N=60
X = A+
x
18-19
16-17
14-15
12-13
10-11
8-9
fd
2*4=8
0*3=0
10 * 2 = 20
17 * 1 = 17
24 * 0 = 0
19 * -1 = -19
7 * -2 = -14
4 * -3 = -12
1 * -4 = -4
fd = -4
f . Xm
55.5
132
217.5
250
105
34
fX m=794
N I L E S H
(-4)
x 5
84
d= (Xm-A)/c
(82-62)/5 = 4
(77-62)/5 = 3
(72-62)/5 = 2
(67-62)/5 = 1
(62-62)/5 = 0
(57-62)/5 = -1
(52-62)/5 = -2
(47-62)/5 = -3
(42-62)/5 = -4
X = 62 +
Xm
82
77
72
67
62
57
52
47
42
f
2
0
10
17
24
19
7
4
1
N=84
Xm
18.5
16.5
14.5
12.5
10.5
8.5
(Note: Above table the value of Xm, f.Xm and d = Xm- A are directly calculate due to compare
the both method. If any doubt to how the values are calculate, then see the before example
to check.)
X =
f
3
8
15
20
10
4
N=60
P A
X
X
X
fd
N
(-20)
= 62 + 84
= 62 - 0.2380 = 61.7619
= 61.76
=A+
P A
X =
X =
fXm
N
5188
84
61.76
61.76
C.I.
18-19
16-17
14-15
12-13
10-11
8-9
X =
8-9
4
Direct Method
N I L E S H
10-11
10
(Note: Above table the value of Xm, f.Xm and d = Xm- A are directly calculate due to compare
the both method. If any doubt to how the values are calculate, then see the before example
to check.)
12-13
20
f.d
2*20=40
0*15=0
10*10=100
17*5=85
24*0=0
19 * -5= -95
7 * -10= -70
4 * -15= -60
1 * -20= -20
fd = -20
14-15
15
Xm d=Xm- A
82
20
77
15
72
10
67
5
62 0
57
-5
52
-10
47
-15
42
-20
16-17
8
f
2
0
10
17
24
19
7
4
1
N=84
18-19
3
x
80-84
75-79
70-74
65-69
60-64
55-59
50-54
45-49
40-44
f . Xm
164
0
720
1139
1488
1083
364
188
42
fX m=5188
Xm
82
77
72
67
62
57
52
47
42
f
2
0
10
17
24
19
7
4
1
N=84
d) x:
f:
Ans:-
C.I.
80-84
75-79
70-74
65-69
60-64
55-59
50-54
45-49
40-44
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
5.5
P A Z A R E
Y average marks is
Wx
Xw =
W
616
Xw =
10
Xw = 61.60
Xw = 61.60
X average marks is
Wx
Xw =
W
626
Xw =
10
Xw = 62.60
Xw = 62.60
WY
1 * 80 = 80
2 * 64 = 128
3 * 56 = 168
4 * 60 = 240
WY = 616
The W eighted arithmetic mean for X Candidate is 62.60 and The W eighted arithmetic
mean for Y Candidate is 61.60
Weight are numbers or percentages which stand for the relative importance of
items. Such a relative importance may be real or estimated, or actual or approximated.
These weights are assigned to each item under the following circumstance:
(i) When the results of the series are studied comparatively,
(ii) When the computation involves ratios or percentages i.e. Death Rates and Birth Rates.
(iii) When we compute the Index Numbers involving prices of essential commodities
having different importance to each one.
Thus weight of a variate is numerical multiplier assigned to it in order to indicate its
relative importance.
N I L E S H
P A
P A
P A Z A R E
In computing simple arithmetic mean, it is assumed that all the items are of
equal importance. This may not always be the case. When items vary in importance they
must be assigned some weights in proportion to their importance. The value of each item
is then multiplied by its weight. The products are summated and divided by the number of
weights, and not by the number of items. the quotient is the weighted arithmetic mean or
average.
Symbolically,
WX
XW =
,
WX = X * W
,
Where W = Weight
W
N I L E S H
So, the average salary paid in the whole industry is Rs. 113.15
113.1458
Wx
W
10072.50
Xw =
200
Xw = 50.3625
Xw = 50.36
Xw =
74450
=
658
f . Xm
160*62.5 = 10000
208*87.5 = 18200
132*125 = 16500
130*175 = 22750
28*250 = 7000
f.Xm= 74450
Xm
(50+75)/2=125/2=62.5
(75+100)/2=175/2=87.5
(100+150)/2=250/2=125
(150+200)/2=350/2=175
(200+300)/2=500/2=250
f.Xm
N
f
160
208
132
130
28
N=658
6.5
30*5
26*8
24*5.5
24*6.5
28*1
200-300
28
by an industry.
May
June
44.25 54.00
10
45
150-200
24
100-150
24
X =
75-100
26
Income
Group
C.I.
50-75
75-100
100-150
150-200
200-300
50-75
30
Income Group:
No. of Firms:
Average No. of
Workers :
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
10
Median :- Median is the value of that item in a series which divides the array into two
In above example Me = 42.5th item, it means that find such c.f. value which is greater than
find th item i.e. c.f. value. Here, we find 42.5th item and from our table value 59 is greater
than value 42.5. So, it mean that the Median value is from 59 c.f. and thats value x = 75.
Therefor, the Median value is 75
71,
66,
78,
74,
60,
63,
69,
61,
75
4
5
6
7
4
3
2
3
1
the data in an array form with serial numbers (ascending order).
cf
4
N+1
Median is the size of th item
2
3+4 = 7
35 + 1 th = 18 th item
Me = )
3+7 = 10
2
5+10 = 15
It lies in 21 c.f.
2+15 = 17
Against 21 c.f. the value is 71
4+17 = 21
So, Median Marks is 71
7+21 = 28
(Note: Median value is identified by locating
1+28 = 29
N + 1 th item falls.)
the respective c.f. in which )
6+29 = 35
2
In above example Me = 18th item, it means that find such c.f. value which is greater than
find th item i.e. c.f. value. Here, we find 18th item and from our table value 21 is greater
than value 18. So, it mean that the Median value is from 21 c.f. and thats value x = 71.
Therefor, the Median value is 71
QDM notes for MBA
Ex (2) x :
f:
Ans: - Arrange
x
f
60
4
61
3
63
3
66
5
69
2
71 4
74
7
75
1
78
6
N=35
10
P A Z A R E
In discrete series, the value are already in the form of array and the frequencies
are recorded against each value.
N I L E S H
P A
N+1
39.5
cf
10
2+10 =12
17+12 = 29
4+29 = 33
7+33 = 40
19+40 = 59
24+59 = 83
1+83 = 84
x
f
60
10
62
2
66
17
67
4
72
7
75 19
78
24
80
1
N=84
79
2
x:
62,
60,
66,
78,
75,
72,
67,
80
f:
2
10
17
24
19
7
4
1
Ans:- Arrange the data in an array form with serial numbers (ascending order).
37 + 42
2
P A
th item
2
6 + 1 th item
7
Median (Me) =
= th item
= 3.5 th item
2
2
The Item lies between 4th & 5th item. So there are two values i.i. 37 & 42.
Then the median value will be mean of these two values i.e.
P A Z A R E
N I L E S H
Median (Me) =
N+1
Ex (1)
N the number
Median (Me) =
N + 1 th
item where Me represents the median and
for cumulative frequencies (cf). The median size is first located with reference to the
cumulative frequency (cf) which cover the size first. Then, against that cumulative frequency (cf) , the value will be located as the median value.
Me is the size of
of items
N+1
However, for determining the size of
item, a separate column is to be prepared
equal parts, one condisting of all the values less than it and the other consisting of all the
values more than it. It means, when the values of variable are arranged in an array form (in
an ascending or descending order of their magnitude), the value of middle item of the
array is the median and it is denote as Me.
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
11
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
x c
50 +
Marks
No. of
C.I.
Student (f)
20-40
4
40-60
6
60-80
10
80-100
16
100-120
12
120-140
7
140-160
3
Marks
Less than 40
Less than 60
Less than 80
Less than 100
Less than 120
Less than 140
Less than 160
x 4
20 + 0.5555
x 5
= 20.5555
P A Z A R E
40-60
6
60-80
10
L.T. c.f.
4
4+6=10
10+10=20
16+20=36
12+36=48
7+48=55
3+55=58
Marks
More than
More than
More than
More than
More than
More than
More than
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
140-160
3
M.T. c.f
4+54=58
6+48=54
10+38=48
16+22=38
12+10=22
7+3=10
3
= 18
From above table, observe that, how the cumulative frequency (c.f) find when class interval
is in the form of Less than or More than.
11
20-40
4
19 )
17.5 + 0.5
x 5 =
18 )
- 24 )
25
9
17.5 +
Me = 20 +
P A
N I L E S H
Ex Marks C.I. :
No. of Student f:
19 - 18 x 4 =
Me = 17.5 +
8
Me = 17.5 + 0.125 x 4
=
Me = 18
Median of Class interval is 18
Me = 20 + 0.1111 x 5
=
Me = 20.56
Median of Class interval is 20.56
( N/2f- c.f. )
L +
P A
P A Z A R E
N I L E S H
Median (Me) =
Note:
Ex (1) 6-9 10-13 14-17 18-21 22-25 26-29 30-33 34-37 38-41 42-45
2
9
7
8
4
5
0
1
1
1
Ans:- Since there is an inclusive class interval distribution, we shall convert it into exclusive class interval series.
Note: How to identified the exclusive class
C.I.
f
c.f.
interval series.
41.5-45.5
1
37 + 1 = 38
=> Series always start from 0. i.e. 0-5, 0-10.
37.5-41.5
1
36 + 1 = 37
means when lower class sustract from up33.5-37.5
1
35 + 1 = 36
per class then find the class interval.
29.5-33.5
0
35 + 0 = 35
Our example series start from 6-9.
25.5-29.5
5
30 + 5 = 35
means 6,7,8,9 = 4. The class interval value
21.5-25.5
4
26 + 4 = 30
is 4, but when lower class substract from
17.5-21.5
8
18 + 8 = 26
upper class then it find the value 3 (9 - 6 = 3).
13.5-17.5
7
11 + 7 = 18
then this class is an inclusive.
9.5-13.5
9
2 + 9 = 11
So, convert an inclusive class into exclusive
5.5-9.5
2
2
class interval series. That is 5.5 - 9.5.
N=38
Then 9.5 - 5.5 = 4. It is correct class interval.
N/2 - c.f.
Median (Me) = L +
x c
f
c.f.
6
6 + 18 = 24
9 + 24 = 33
10 + 33 = 43
4 + 44 = 47
3 + 48 = 50
f
6
18
9
10
4
3
N=50
L +
C.I.
10-15
15-20
20-25
25-30
30-35
35-40
Median (Me) =
N/2 - c.f.
f
A different procedure is adopted to find out the Median value under continous
series. The class intervals are already in the form of array and the frequencies are recorded against each class interval. For determining the size, we should take N/2th item
and median class is locaed accordingly with reference to the cumulative frequency, which
covers the size first. When the Median class is located, the median value is to be interpolated with the help of the following formula:
12
Median (Me) =
x 10
P A Z A R E
= 40.8333
= 45
N I L E S H
In problem
given
below 60
under 62.50
62.50 - 95
over 95
100 & over
Monthly
wages (Rs.)
Less than 60
Less than 62.50
62.50 - 95
More than 95
100 & over
C.I.
Note :-
0 - 60
60 - 62.5
62.5 - 95
95 - 100
100 & over
s.f.
F(%)
4%
15%
Diff
15%
5%
4%
15-4=11%
100-30=70%
15-5=10%
5%
40
110
700
100
50
P A Z A R E
For Less than and More than Class interval, see the before examples
Less than 60
Less than 62.50
0-60
60-62.50
4%
15-4=11%
More than 95
100 & over
15-5=10%
5%
f
40
110
700
100
50
N=1000
c.f.
40
40+110=150
110+150=850
850+100=950
950+50=1000
C.I.
0-60
60-62.50
62.5-95
95-100
100 & over
E
12
40 + 5
x 10
Ex (5):- In a group of 1000 wage earners, the monthly wages of 4% are below Rs. 60 and
those of 15% are under Rs. 62.50. 15% earned Rs. 95 over, and 5% got Rs. 100 and over.
Find the median wage.
Ans: Let us prepare the table showing different types of % frequencies and then convert it
into the original frequencies.
48)
Me = 40 + 0.5 x 10
=
Me = 45
Median of Class interval is 45
40 +
x 10 =
P A
P A
- 21 x 10 = 40 + 0.5
Me = 40 + 21.5
6
6
Me = 40 + 0.08333 x 10
=
40 + 0.8333
Me = 40.83
Median of Class interval is 40.83
- 21 )
25
8
N I L E S H
Me = 40 +
x c
( N/2f- c.f.)
x c
L +
Median (Me) =
c.f.
2
6
11
21
27
36
43
( N/2f- c.f. )
f
2
6-2=4
11-6=5
21-11=10
27-21=6
36-27=9
43-36=7
N=43
c.f.
C.I.
2
Less than 10
6
10 - 20
11
20 - 30
21 After Converting 30 - 40
27
40 - 50
36
50 - 60
43
60 - 70
C.I.
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
L +
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
L +
13
( N/2f- c.f. )
Ex (7):- From the following data find out the missing frequency if the median is 50.
Class interval: 10-20
20-30
30-40
40-50
50-60 60-70
Frequencies:
2
8
6
--15
10
x c
50 =
50 +
( 41+A
)
2
- ( 16 + A )
15
x 10
N
L E( S ) H
(
) I
41+A
- ( 16 + A )
2
x 10
15
( 410 +2 10A )
- 160 - 10A
, 0 =
41*10 + 10A
2
15
- (16*10 + 10A )
, 0 =
P A
P A Z A R E
15
0 = 45 - 5A
5A = 45 ,
A = 45 / 5
B.
229 = 12+30+A+65+B+25+18
229 = 150 + A + B
229 - 150 = A + B
79 = A + B
A + B = 79
---- (1)
13
70-80
18
= 16.995 = 17
60-70
25
x 5
Me =14.995+ 500-400
x 5 = 14.995 + 150
250
250
Me = 14.995 + 0.4 x 5
=
14.995 + 2
Median of Class interval is 17
x 10
15
Missing frequency is 9
- ( 16 + A )
P A Z A R E
0 =
( 41+A
)
2
c.f.
2
2+8 = 10
6+10 = 16
16+A = 16 + A
15+16+A = 31+A
10+31+A = 41+A
1000=100+300+250+Diff
1000=650+Diff
Diff=1000-650
Diff=350
f
100
300
250
(Diff)
N=1000
P A
No. of workers
10%
30%
250
(Diff)
f
2
8
6
A
15
10
N=41+A
50 +
50 - 50 =
Me =
N I L E S H
C.I.
- 20
- 30
- 40
- 50
- 60
- 70
Ex (6):- 10 percent of the workers in a firm, employing a total of 1000 workers, earn
between Rs. 5 and 9.99, 30 percent between Rs. 10 and Rs. 14.99, 250 workers between
Rs. 15 and Rs. 19.99 and the rest Rs. 20 and above. What is the median wage?
Ans:- Since there is an inclusive class interval distribution, we shall convert it into exclusive class interval series.
10
20
30
40
50
60
= 78.75
62.5 + 16.25
x 32.5
350
)
700
x 32.5 = 62.5 +
500-150
)
700
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
14
(Tip :- Median is given and from defination of Median the c.f. value is less than N / 2 )
Since, Median = 46 (Given).
46 =
x c
40 +
6 =
x 10
x 10
Me = 50 + 1 x 10
Me = 50 + 10
Me = 60
N I L E S H
P A Z A R E
c.f.
1+49 = 50
5+44 = 49
12+32 = 44
15+17 = 32
10+7 = 17
4+3 = 7
3
N / 2 = 50 / 2 = 25
Me = 20 +
25-17
15
8
15
x 5
x 5
Me = 20 + 0.5333 x 5
Me = 20 + 2.6666
Me = 22.6666
Me = 8.05 +
Me = 8.05 + 0.48
( 12
)
25
,
x 1
(Note:- Above examples, class interval takes descreasing order and defination of median, the cumulative frequency (c.f.) is find from summation of frequency with increasing order of class interval. Thats why summation of frequency start from bottom of
table means increasing order of class interval.)
Me = 8.53
14
Me = 8.05 + 0.48 * 1
,
Median of Class interval is 8.53
x 1
f
1
5
12
15
10
4
3
N=50
Ans:
C.I.
35-40
30-35
25-30
20-25
15-20
10-15
5-10
5-10
3
P A
( 5025- 38 )
Me = 50 +
40-20
20
20
20
Me = 8.05 +
Me = 50 +
P A
P A Z A R E
N / 2 = 80 / 2 = 40
N I L E S H
6 * 65 = 725 - 10 A
Put, A = 33.5 on equation A + B = 79
390 = 725 - 10 A
33.5 + B = 79
10A = 725 - 390
B = 79 - 33.5
10 A = 335
B = 45.5
A = 335 / 10
A = 33.5
B = 45.5
Missing frequencies are A = 33.5 and B = 45.5
As the frequencies are interger, then A = 33 and B = 46 or A = 34 and B = 45.
c.f.
2+78 = 80
9+69 = 78
12+57 = 69
17+40 = 57
20+20 = 40
9+11 = 20
6+5 = 11
5
6 =
114.5 - 42 - A x 10
65
72.5 * 10 - 10 A
65
x 10
f
2
9
12
17
20
9
6
5
N=80
65
114.5 - (42+A)
46 - 40 =
x 10
65
72.5 - A x 10
6 =
65
- ( 42 + A )
20-30
5
( 229
2 )
Ans:
C.I.
90-100
80-90
70-80
60-70
50-60
40-50
30-40
20-30
30-40
6
L+
Me =
- c.f.
( N2 )
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
15
Mode :-
20 - 9
= 50 +
= 50 + 11 x 10
14
= 50 + 7.8571,
40-50
9
30-40
6
20-30
5
x 10
(20 - 9) - (17-20)
50-60
20
f1 - f0
x c
(f1 - f0) - (f2 - f1)
L +
Z = 50 +
11
x 10
(11) - (-3)
Z = 57.8571,
Z = 57.86
Ex (4):- C.I. :
f:
Ans:
C.I.
5-10
10-15
15-20
20-25
25-30
30-35
35-40
30-35
5
25-30
12
20-25
15
15-20
10
10-15
4
5-10
3
P A Z A R E
f
3
4
10 f0
15 f1
12 f2
5
1
c.f.
3
4+3 = 7
10+7 = 17
15+17 = 32
12+32 = 44
5+44 = 49
1+49 = 50
15 - 10
= 20 + 5
8
x 5
Z = 20 +
= 20 + 3.125
Z = 23.125
f1 - f0
x c
(f1 - f0) - (f2 - f1)
L +
Z = 20 +
5*5
8
,
,
x 5
(5) - (-3)
Z = 20 + 25
8
Z = 23.13
Mode ( Z ) = 23.13
X = Mean
15
= 20 +
x 5
Z = 3 Me - 2 X
35-40
1
Z = Mode,
Me = Medain
N I L E S H
Continous Series:- Under the continous series, the modal class is located with the help of
highest frequencies or grouping or inspection (maxium concentration of frequencies).
The same procdure is adopted as it is followed in case discret series. After locating the
modal class, we have to interpolate the value of the mode within the modal class by using
the following formulas:
f1 - f0
f1 - f0
Z = L +
x c or
Z = L+
x c
2f1 - f0 - f2
(f1 - f0) - (f2 - f1)
Z = 50 + 110
14
P A
P A
When the number of items increase, we may convert the data into a descrete
form. Then, the value having the maximum frequency will be treated as the Mode.
Z = Mode,
L = Lower limit of the modal class interval,
f0 = Frequency of the class interval preceding the modal class interval,
f1 = Fequency of the modal class interval,
f2 = Fequency of the class interval succeeding the modal class interval,
c = magnitude of the modal class interval
Mode ( Z ) = 57.86
P A Z A R E
Z = 50 + 11 * 10
14
N I L E S H
When the number of items increase, we may convert the data into a descrete
form. Then, the value having the maximum frequency will be treated as the Mode.
c.f.
2+78 = 80
9+69 = 78
12+57 = 69
17+40 = 57
20+20 = 40
9+11 = 20
6+5 = 11
5
60-70
17
f
2
9
12
17 f2
20 f1
9 f0
6
5
70-80
12
The mode is 13 as it occurs the highest number of times (i.e. 3 times) in the
series. So the mode is clearly defined.
90-100 80-90
2
9
Ex (3):- C.I. :
f:
Ans:
C.I.
90-100
80-90
70-80
60-70
50-60
40-50
30-40
20-30
It is the value which occurs with the maximum frequency. It is most typical or
common value that receives the highest frequency. The modal class of a frequency distribution is the class with the highest frequency. It is denoted b a symbol Z.
Mode is the value of variable which is repeated the greatest number of times in
the series.
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
16
Quartilies:-
First Quartile (Lower Quartile) Q1 is the value below which there are one fourth of the items
and above which there are three fourth of the items.
Second Quartile (Median) Q2 divides the total distribution into two halves.
P A Z A R E
(III)
N I L E S H
P A Z A R E
)x c
Coefficient of C of Q.D.
&
Q3 = L +
Q 3 - Q1
Q 3 + Q1
3N/4 - F
f
)x c
(1):Ans:-
3
2
Q.D. =
9
3
Q 3 - Q1
2
( 7 4+ 1 )th item
Q1 =
8
4
)th item
19
4
23
5
27
6
31
7
Q1 =
(n 4+ 1 )th item
X
N
, Q3 =
( 3 (n 4+ 1) )th item
, Q3 =
, Q3 =
(3 4* 8 )th item
Q1 =
16
Q1 = L +
R=L-S
= 29 - 1
= 28
L-S
C.R. =
L+ S
C.R. = 29 - 1
29+ 1
C.R. = 28
30
= 0.933
R=L-S
= 21 - 9
= 12
L-S
C.R. =
L+ S
C.R. = 21 - 9
21+9
C.R. = 12
30
= 0.4
Q3 =
(I)
Range R = L - S
= 17 - 13
=4
L-S
Coeff. of R. =
L+ S
Coeff. of R. = 17 - 13
17+ 13
4
Coeff. of R. =
30
= 0.1333
17
21
29
13,
9,
1,
Values of variables
14,
15,
16,
12,
15,
18,
8,
15,
22,
(II)
Quartile Deviation:-
P A
Ex (1):- Compute the range and the Coefficient of Range of the series, and state which one
is more dispersed and which one is more uniform.
Q2 =
P A
(n 4+ 1 )th item
N I L E S H
Q1 =
Range repersents the difference between the values of the etremes-- the larges
value and the smallest value. The value in between the two extremes are not at all taken
into consideration. It is denoted symbolically by R.
Range:-
Third Quartile (Upper Quartile) Q3 is the value below which there are three fourth of the
items and above which there are one fourth of the items.
The Quartiles are also positional averages like the median. As the median value
divides the entire distribution into two equal parts, the quartiles (Q1 , Q2 and Q3 ) divide the
entire distribution into four equal parts.
Series
i.
ii
iii
Ans:
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
Q3 =
24
2
Ans:-
24
30
0.8
4
1
7
2
13
3
17
4
24
5
30
6
32
7
39
8
X
N
Q1 =
Q 3 - Q1
2
Q1 =
n+1
4
( 8 4+ 1)th item
th
item
, Q3 =
, Q3 =
3 (n + 1)
4
th
item
item
31.5 - 8.25
31.5+ 8.25
23.25
39.75
N I L E S H
Q 3 - Q1
2
11.5 - 3.5
2
8
2
= 11.625
Q 3 - Q1
Q3 + Q1
11.5 - 3.5
11.5+ 3.5
8
15
0.5333
0.5849
17
(4):Ans:-
3
2
Q.D. =
10
3
15
4
27
5
Q 3 - Q1
2
Q1 =
3
6
42
7
46
8
49
9
(n 4+ 1 )th item
50
10
, Q3 =
Q1 =
12
4
)th item
, Q3 =
( 3 *4 12 )th item
Q1 =
12
4
)th item
, Q3 =
, Q3 = 3 ( 11 + 1)
4
36
4
X
N
( 3 (n 4+ 1) )th item
Q1 =
55
11
)th item
Q 3 - Q1
Q3 + Q1
Coffiecient of Q.D. =
(3 4* 5 )th item
23.25
= 11.625
2
, Q3 =
31.5 - 8.25
=
2
Coffiecient of Q.D. =
P A Z A R E
Q 3 - Q1
2
, Q3 =
Q.D. =
)th item
( 3 (n 4+ 1) )th item
P A
item
9 th
27 th
item
, Q3 = 4
item
4
th
( 2.25 ) item
,
Q3 = ( 6.75 )th item
nd item
rd item
nd item
(2)
+ 0.25 x (3
-2
),
Q3 = ( 6 )th item + 0.75 x (7th item - 6th item)
7 + 0.25 x ( 13 - 7 )
,
Q3 = 30 + 0.75 x ( 32 - 30 )
7 + 0.25 x ( 6 )
,
Q3 = 30 + 0.75 x ( 2 )
7 + 1.25
,
Q3 = 30 + 1.5
8.25
,
Q3 = 31.5
Q1 =
Q1 =
Q1 =
Q1 =
Q1 =
Q1 =
Q1 =
th
P A
Q1 =
3* 9
, Q3 =
4
5
4
, Q3 =
5
15
th
th
item
, Q3 =
item
4
4
th
th
( 1.25 ) item
,
Q3 = ( 3.75 ) item
( 1 )st item + 0.25 x (2nd item - 1st item) ,
Q3 = ( 3 )rd item + 0.75 x (4th item - 3rd item)
3 + 0.25 x ( 5 - 3 )
,
Q3 = 10 + 0.75 x ( 12 - 10 )
3 + 0.25 x ( 2 )
,
Q3 = 10 + 0.75 x ( 2 )
3 + 0.25
,
Q3 = 10 + 1.5
3.5
,
Q3 = 11.5
Q.D. =
)
P( A
Z A( ) R E
9
4
( n 4+ 1 )th item
Q.D. =
Q1 =
Q1 =
Q1 =
Q1 =
Q1 =
Q1 =
N I L( ) E S( H
)
Q1 =
Q1 =
Ans:-
Q 3 - Q1
,
2
X
N
12
4
( 4 4+ 1 )th item
Q1 =
(2):-
10
3
27 - 3
27+ 3
5
2
Q1 =
Q 3 - Q1
Q3 + Q1
3
1
Q.D. =
= 12
3, 10, 12, 5
27 - 3
2
Q 3 - Q1
2
(3):-
24 th
item
4
th
Q3 = ( 6 ) item
Q3 = 27
Q.D. =
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
8
th
item
4
th
Q1 = ( 2 ) item
Q1 = 3
Q1
17
)th item
Second Edition 2013 - 2014
18
Q1 = ( 3 )th item
Q1 = 10
39
2
Coffiecient of Q.D. =
= 19.5
Q 3 - Q1
Q3 + Q1
40 - 13.67
40 + 13.67
26.33
53.67
0.49
49 - 10
2
Q 3 - Q1
Q.D. =
2
Q3 = ( 9 )th item
Q3 = 49
,
,
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
0.6666
Q3 - Q1
Quartile Deviation(QD) =
2
N/4-cf
f
Q1 = L +
N/4 -
cf x c
f
N = 35,
N
35
=
4
4 = 8.75
L = 16.5, cf = 5, f = 5,
c=5
3N/4- cf
f
3N
3 x 35 129
=
4 =
4
4 = 26.25
L = 31.5,cf = 22, f = 7,
c=5
8.75-5
5
3.75
Q1 = 16.5 + x 5
5
= 16.5 + 0.75 x 5
= 16.5 + 3.75
= 20.25
Q1 = 20.25
26.25 - 22
x 5
7
4.25
Q3 = 31.5 + x 5
7
= 31.5 + 0.6071 x 5
= 31.5 + 3.0357
= 34.5357
Q3 = 34.54
Q1 = L +
Q3 = L + x c
P A Z A R E
Q1 = 16.5 + x 5
Q 3 - Q1
2
Q3 = 31.5 +
34.54-20.25
=
2
14.29
2
= 7.145
Q.D. =
= 13.16
26.33
2
40 - 13.67
2
Q 3 - Q1
Q.D. =
2
Q3 = 39.5 +
32.25 - 32
x 10
5
0.25
Q3 = 39.5 + x 10
5
= 39.5 + 0.05 x 10
= 39.5 + 0.5
= 40
Q3 = 40
Q1 = 9.5 + x 10
10.75-7
9
3.75
Q1 = 9.5 +
x 10
9
= 9.5 + 0.41666 x 10
= 9.5 + 4.1666
= 13.6666
Q1 = 13.67
Q3 = L + x c
3N/4- cf
f
3N
3 x 43 129
=
4 =
4
4 = 32.25
L = 39.5,cf = 32, f = 5,
c = 10
Q1 = L +
x c
N/4 - cf
x c
f
N = 43,
N
43
=
4
4 = 10.75
L = 9.5, cf = 7, f = 9,
c = 10
x c &
3N/4-cf
Q3 = L +
f
Q 3 - Q1
Q3 + Q1
34.54 -20.25
34.54+20.25
14.29
54.79
0.2608
18
P A
P A Z ( A) R (E )
P A
N I L E S H
N I L E S H
Ex (5):- 0-9
10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69
7
9
6
10
5
4
2
Ans:- Since there is an inclusive class interval distribution, we shall convert it into exclusive class interval series.
C.I.
C.I.
f
c.f.
60-69
59.5-69.5
2
2+41= 43
50-59
49.5-59.5
4
4+37 = 41
40-49
39.5-49.5
5
5+32 = 37
After Converting
30-39
29.5-39.5
10
10+22 = 32
20-29
19.5-29.5
6
6+16 = 22
10-19
9.5-19.5
9
9+7 = 16
0-9
0.5-9.5
7
7
N=43
Ex (6):- 7-11
12-16 17-21 22-26 27-31 32-36 37-41 42-46
2
3
5
4
8
7
2
4
Ans:- Since there is an inclusive class interval distribution, we shall convert it into exclusive class interval series.
C.I.
C.I.
f
c.f.
7-11
6.5-11.5
2
2
12-16
11.5-16.5
3
3+2 = 5
17-21
16.5-21.5
5
5+5 = 10
22-26
21.5-26.5
4
4+10 = 14
After Converting
27-31
26.5-31.5
8
8+14 = 22
32-36
31.5-36.5
7
7+22 = 29
37-41
36.5-41.5
2
2+29 = 31
42-46
41.5-46.5
4
4+31 = 35
N=35
Q3 - Q1
3N/4-cf
QD =
Q1 = L + N/4-cf x c & Q3 = L +
x c
2
49 - 10
49 + 10
Q 3 - Q1
Q3 + Q1
Coffiecient of Q.D. =
19
Mean Deviation:-
or
fd
n
N I L E S H
A=3 xA = 9+10+18=37
A
Ex (2):- From the following variables find the Mean Deviation and Coefficient of Mean
Deviation from the mean. ====> 15, 4, 3, 10, 12, 5, 1, 2, 6, 12
Ans: Arrange the data in an ascending order to have the short cut method applicable.
x
=
n
d
=
=
n
X =
70
= 7
10
42
= 4.2
10
Coefficient of =
4.2
7
= 0.6
Coefficient of = 0.6
(Tip: the devations (d) are treated as positive
ignoring the negative sign.)
Second Edition 2013 - 2014
d=x-X
1-7= 6
2-7= 5
3-7= 4
4-7= 3
5-7= 2
6-7= 1
10-7= 3
12-7= 5
12-7= 5
15-7= 8
d = 42
R
19
x
1
2
3
4
5
6
10
12
12
15
x=70,n=10
(i) Make two sections in the entire distribution, as A and B, so that all the items greater than
average (including average) should fall in A section and all the items smaller than average should fall in the B section.
(ii) Terms used in the formula:
xA :
the sum of the values greater than average.
xB :
the sum of the values smaller than average.
A
:
the total number of items greater than average.
B
:
the total number ot items smaller than average.
n
:
the total number of items.
fxA :
the sum of the fx greater than the average.
fxB :
the sum of the fx smaller than the average.
fA :
the sum of the frequencies greater than average
fB :
the sum of the frequencies smaller than average
P A Z A R E
xA -xB - (A - B) X
n
37 - 13 - (3 - 3) * 8.34
6
24 - ( 0 ) * 8.34
6
24
= 4
6
P A
P A Z A R E
B=3 xB = 3+4+6=13
B
n=6,
X = 8.34
P A
When the averages are in fractions, the calculation of mean deviation becomes a tedious
job. So, to make the things more simplified, a shor-cut method or formula is used as
under:
xA - xB - (A - B) Me*
(A) Individual Observations: =
n
9
10
18
N I L E S H
(Note: d is the sum of the deviations and fd is the sum of the products f and d).
x
3
4
6
Coefficient of = 0.48
50
= 8.3333 = 8.34
6
24
= 4
6
4
Coefficient of =
=
= 0.4796
x
8.34
x
=
n
d
=
=
n
X =
or
Me
d=x-X
3-8.34= 5.34
4-8.34= 4.34
6-8.34= 2.34
9-8.34= 0.66
10-8.34= 1.66
18-8.34= 9.66
d = 24
x
3
4
6
9
10
18
x=50,n=6
Coefficient of
Ex (1):- From the following variables find the Mean Deviation and Coefficient of Mean
Deviation from the mean. ====> 10, 18, 3, 9, 6, 4
Ans: Arrange the data in an ascending order to have the short cut method applicable.
Mean Devaiation is the average difference among the items in a series from the
mean itself or median or mode of that series. It is concerned with the extent to which the
values are despersed about the mean or the median or the mode. It is found by the
averaging all the deviations from the central tendency. These deviations are taken into
computations with regard to negative sign (i.e. all the deviations assumed as possitive).
In aggregating the devations, the algebraic negative signs are not taken into
account. It means all the devations are treated as positive ignoring the negative sign.
Mean deviation or average deviation is denoted symbolically by the Greak small
alphabet (delta)
d
(A) Individual Observations: =
............. Absolute Measure
n
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
*
fuysk ;ks- ik>kjs 09766134400
20
4) Ans: Arrange the data in an descending order.
28.69
120
P A Z A R E
16.1538
16.15
C.I.
16-17
14-15
12-13
10-11
8-9
6-7
4-5
f
5
4
4
8
5
4
2
N=32
Xm
16.5
14.5
12.5
10.5
8.5
6.5
4.5
f.Xm
5*16.5=82.5
4*14.5=58
4*12.5=50
8*10.5=4
5*8.5=42.5
4*6.5=26
2*4.5=9
f.Xm=352
fd
n
X = f.Xm/ n
352
32
=11
d=Xm - X
16.5-11=5.5
14.5-11=3.5
12.5-11=1.5
10.5-11=0.5
8.5-11=2.5
6.5-11=4.5
4.5-11=6.5
f.d
5*5.5= 27.5
4*3.5= 14
4*1.5= 6
8*0.5= 4
5*2= 12.5
4*4.5= 18
2*6.5= 13
fd = 95
P A Z A R E
95
32
2.9687
2.97
(Tip: the devations (d) are treated as positive ignoring the negative sign.)
5):-
4-5
2
70-79
14
6-7
4
8-9
5
120-129
8
130-139
4
From above observation, the value of Mean Deviation = 28.69, So student can solve the
problem both the formula, but use easy one.
N I L E S H
120*83= 9960
140*55=7700
160*20=3200
180*9=1620
1680
104
10 - 11 12 - 13 14 - 15 16 - 17
8
4
4
5
20
P A
83
55
20
9
A=83+55+20+9=167
xA = 9960+7700+3200+1620=22480
Put all these values in formula
xA -xB - (A - B) z
=
n
22480-11620-(167-153) * 120
=
320
10860 - (14*120)
10860 - 1680
=
=
320
320
9180
=
= 28.6875 = 28.69
320
120
140
160
180
B=6+19+40+23+65=153
xB = 120+760+2400+1840+6500=11620
P A
fx
20*6=120
40*19=760
60*40=2400
80*23=1840
100*65=6500
f
6
19
40
23
65
fd
n
Coefficient of = 0.2390
N I L E S H
x
20
40
60
80
100
f.d
4*40=160
8*30=240
14*20=280
16v10=160
20*0=0
16*10=160
14*20=280
8*30=240
4*40=160
fd = 1680
d=Xm - X
134.5-94.5=40
124.5-94.5=30
114.5-94.5=20
104.5-94.5=10
94.5-94.5=0
84.5-94.5=10
74.5-94.5=20
64.5-94.5=30
54.5-94.5=40
Coefficient of =
f.Xm
X = f.Xm/ n
4*134.5=538
8*124.5=996
14*114.5=1603
16*104.5=1672
9828
20*94.5=1890
104
16*84.5=1352
=94.5
14*74.5=1043
8*64.5=516
4*54.5=218
f.Xm=9828
= 28.69
Xm
134.5
124.5
114.5
104.5
94.5
84.5
74.5
64.5
54.5
fd
6*100=600
19*80=1520
40*60=2400
23*40=920
65*20=1300
83*0= 0
55*20=1100
20*40=800
9*60=540
fd = 9180
d=x-z
20-120=100
40-120=80
60-120=60
80-120=40
100-120=20
120-120= 0
140-120=20
160-120=40
180-120=60
f
6
19
40
23
65
83
55
20
9
n=6
C.I.
f
130-139 4
120-129 8
110-119 14
100-109 16
90-99
20
80-89
16
70-79
14
60-69
8
50-59
4
N=104
Ex (3):- Following are the runs scored by the btsmen in different innings of cricket tests.
Runs:
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
No of Batsmen:
6
19
40
23
65
83
55
20
9
Compute the Mean Deviation from mode and its Coefficient.
Ans: Arrange the data in an ascending order to have the short cut method applicable.
x
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
21
Coefficient of Variation
(x - X)2
n
* 100
or
N I L E S H
Coefficient of Variation
* 100
A: Individual Observation
d2
n -
(n)
fd2
n
fd
n
d
n fd2
n
d
n
(fd
)
n
x c
2
x c
c - Common factor
21
1105.34
= 184.22 = 13.57
6
= 203 - ( -4.33)2 =
203 - 18.77
13.57
c.v. =
* 100 =
* 100 = 0.3107*100
= 184.23 = 13.57
X
43.67
c.v. = 31.07%
d
n
N I L E S H
From above observation, it seen than example solve by any method the answer is come
same. So student solve easy method, which they are suitable to solve the problems.
P A Z A R E
Ex (2):- From the following variables find the Standard Deviation and Coefficient of
variation(c.v.)
====> 50, 26, 37, 35, 34
Ans: Arrange the data in an ascending order
x
d=x-X
26
26-36.40 = -10.4
34
34-36.40 = -2.4
35
35-36.40 = -1.4
37
37-36.40 = 0.6
50
50-36.40 = 13.6
x=182
d2
(-10.4)2=108.16
(-2.4)2=5.76
(-1.4)2=1.96
(0.6)2=0.36
(13.6)2=184.96
d2 = 301.20
x
182
X = n = 5 = 36.40
d2
n
301.20
= 60.24 = 7.76
5
7.76
c.v. = X * 100 = 36.4 * 100 = 0.2131*100
c.v. = 21.31%
d2
(-9)2 = 81
(-1)2 = 1
(0)2 = 0
(2)2 = 4
(15)2 = 225
d2 = 311
d=(x- A)
26-35= -9
34-35= -1
35-35= 0
37-35= 2
50-35= 15
d = 7
d2
d
n - n
( )
= 62.2 - ( 1.4)2
=
60.24
311
5
( 75 )
62.2 - 1.96
7.76
( )
A: Individual Observation
1218
-26
- 6
6
Step-deviation Method:The deviations are further divided by the common factor in case of assumed
mean. This deliberate error is compensated by multiplying the entire formula by the same
factor. The formula works as under.
( )
P A
P A Z A R E
P A
Short Cut Method:Sometimes the mean will be a fractional figure. Then we should take the deviations from the assumed mean and the direct method formula will be having some adjustment.. As the deviations are not taken from the actual mean we get the d as some value
instead zero. The short cut formula works as under.
d2
d
n - n
f(x - X)2
n
fd 2
n
x
262
X = n = 6 = 43.6666 = 43.67
d2
(-25)2= 625
(-18)2= 324
(-5)2= 25
(0)2= 0
(10)2= 100
(12)2= 144
d2 = 1218
d=(x- A)
23-48= -25
30-48= -18
43-48= -5
48-48= 0
58-48= 10
60-48= 12
d = -26
or
d 2
n
d2
(-20.67) =427.25
(-13.67)2=186.87
(-0.67)2=0.45
(4.33)2=18.75
(14.33)2=205.35
(16.33)2=266.67
d2 = 1105.34
2
x
d=x-X
23
23-43.67= -20.67
30
30-43.67= -13.67
43
43-43.67= -0.67
48
48-43.67= 4.33
58
58-43.67= 14.33
60
60-43.67= 16.33
x=262
A: Individual Observations:
Ex (1):- From the following variables find the Standard Deviation and Coefficient of
variation(c.v.)
====> 43, 48, 60, 30, 58, 23
Ans: Arrange the data in an ascending order
Standard Deviation is the root of the sum of the squares of the deviations devided
by their number. it is also called Mean Error Deviation, Mean Square Deviation or Root
Mean Square Deviation. It is a second moment of a dispersion. Since the sum of the
square of the deviation from the mean is minimum, the deviations are taken only from
mean (but not from median or mode).
Standard Deviation is the root-mean-square average of all the deviations from
the mean and it is denoted by (sigma).
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
22
Ans: Arrange the data in an ascending order.
* 100
X
38.50
= 0.8436 * 100 = 84.36%
CV =
CV
* 100 =
X
43.10
= 0.8271 * 100 = 82.71%
= 8.6168 = 8.62
8.62
CV
CV
74.25
B is better in studies and he should get a prize also as his average is more and variance
is less.
P A Z A R E
Ex (5):- Prices of particular commodity in five yearsin two cities are given below.
Tests:
1
2
3
4
5
City A :
20
22
19
23
16
City B :
10
20
18
12
15
Find from the table which city had more stable prices.
Ans:
City A
City B
x
d=x - X
d2 = d*d
x
d=x-X
d2 = d*d
2
16
16-20= -4 (-4) =16
10
10-15 = -5
( -5 )2 = 25
2
19
19-20= -1 (-1) = 1
12
12-15 = -3
( -3 )2 = 9
20
20-20= 0 (0)2 = 0
15
15-15 = 0
( 0 )2 = 0
2
22
22-20= 2 (2) = 4
18
18-15 = 3
( 3 )2 = 9
2
23
23-20= 3 (3) = 9
20
20-15 = 5
( 5 )2 = 25
x=100
d2 = 30
x=75
d2 = 68
x
100
x
75
X =
=
= 20
X =
=
= 15
n
5
n
5
dn = 305
= 2.45
dn = 685
13.6
= 3.6878 = 3.69
Second Edition 2013 - 2014
E
22
* 100 =
* 100
X
61.5
= 0.1401 * 100 = 14.01%
R
6
7
8
9
10
72
72
51
60
54
69
72
51
57
66
is the criterion for awarding a prize, who
CV =
* 100 =
* 100
X
60.90
= 0.2022 * 100 = 20.22%
(Tip:- The word-> more consistent, more stable, more uniform then check the coefficient of
variation value and if coefficient value (cv) is less, then that group is more consistent,
more stable and more uniform.)
4
5
48
52
60
63
if consistency
N I L E S H
DECO is a better run scorer and more consistent player than NEKO. (because his average is more and variation is less)
742.50
10
= 12.3162 = 12.32
12.32
1270.69
* 100
d 2 =
n
P A
* 100 =
151.69
CV =
P A Z A R E
= 35.647 = 35.65
35.65
615
= 61.5
10
1516.90
10
x
=
n
12706.90
10
d 2 =
n
X =
d2 = d*d
(-13.5)2=182.25
(-10.5)2=110.25
(-7.5)2=56.25
(-4.5)2=20.25
(-1.5)2=2.25
(1.5)2=2.25
(4.5)2=20.25
(7.5)2=56.25
(10.5)2=110.25
(13.5)2=182.25
d2 = 742.50
d 2 =
n
609
= 60.90
10
-13.5
-10.5
-7.5
-4.5
-1.5
1.5
4.5
7.5
10.5
13.5
CV =
x
=
n
(B) x
d=x-X
48 48-61.5=
51 51-61.5=
54 54-61.5=
57 57-61.5=
60 60-61.5=
63 63-61.5=
66 66-61.5=
69 69-61.5=
72 72-61.5=
75 75-61.5=
x=615
1054.65
431
= 43.1
10
X =
P A
10546.50 =
10
x
=
n
d 2 =
n
X =
385
= 38.5
10
d2 = d*d
(-35.1)2=1232.01
(-35.1)2=1232.01
(-31.1)2=967.21
(-30.1)2=906.01
(-27.1)2=734.41
(-3.1)2=9.61
(12.1)2=166.41
(41.9)2=1755.61
(52.9)2=2798.41
(53.9)2=2905.21
d2 = 12706.90
x
=
n
= 32.475 = 32.48
32.48
CV
DECO
x
d=x-X
8
8-43.1= -35.1
8
8-43.1= -35.1
12 12-43.1= -31.1
13 13-43.1= -30.1
16 16-43.1= -27.1
40 40-43.1= -3.1
56 56-43.1= 12.9
85 85-43.1= 41.9
96 96-43.1= 52.9
97 97-43.1= 53.9
x=431
N I L E S H
X =
d2 = d*d
(-38.5)2=1482.25
(-31.5)2=992.25
(-25.5)2=650.25
(-24.5)2=600.25
(-16.5)2=272.25
(-2.5)2=6.25
(6.5)2=42.25
(26.5)2=702.25
(43.5)2=1892.25
(62.5)2=3906.25
d2 = 10546.50
NECO
x
d=x - X
0
0-38.5= -38.5
7
7-38.5= -31.5
13 13-38.5= -25.5
14 14-38.5= -24.5
22 22-38.5= -16.5
36 36-38.5= -2.5
45 45-38.5= 6.5
65 65-38.5= 26.5
82 82-38.5= 43.5
101 101-38.5= 62.5
x=385
d2 = d*d
(-16.9)2=285.61
(-12.9)2=166.41
(-9.9)2=98.01
(-8.9)2=79.21
(-6.9)2=47.61
(-0.9)2=0.81
(11.1)2=123.21
(11.1)2=123.21
(15.1)2=228.01
(19.1)2=364.81
d2 = 1516.90
(A) x
d=x - X
44 44-60.9= -16.9
48 48-60.9= -12.9
51 51-60.9= -9.9
52 52-60.9= -8.9
54 54-60.9= -6.9
60 60-60.9= -0.9
72 72-60.9= 11.1
72 72-60.9= 11.1
76 76-60.9= 15.1
80 80-60.9= 19.1
x=609
Ex (3):- Following are the runs scored by the two batsmen named NEKO and DECO in ten
innings. Find who is better scorer and who is more consistent.
NEKO:
101
22
0
36
82
45
7
13
65
14
DECO:
97
12
40
96
13
8
85
8
56
16
Ans: Arrange the data in an ascending order.
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
23
3.69
*100 =
* 100
X
15
= 0.246 * 100 = 24.60%
CV =
CV
Coefficient of variation is less in prices of City A: the prices of City A are more stable than
the City B.
2.66 - ( -0.925)
2.66 - 0.8556
94
40
-32
X = 1.2
( 40 )
2.35 - ( -0.8)
* 100
- 0.64
23
1.6
- 0.3136
= 1.1341 = 1.134
fx
13*13=169
14*10=140
15*12=180
16*2=32
17*1=17
x=538
Girls
d=x-A
-2
-1
0
1
2
fd
13* -2 = -26
10* -1 = -10
12* 0 = 0
2* 1 = 2
1* 2 = 2
fd= -32
= 7.85%
fd 2
-2 * -26 = 52
-1* -10 = 10
0*0=0
1*2=2
2*2=4
fd2 =68
P A Z A R E
= 1.0804
fd 2
n -
(n)
68
38
-32
fx
=
n
X =
538
38
X = 14.1578 = 14.16
( 38 ) =
1.7895 - ( -0.8421) 2 =
1.7895- 0.7091
= 1.0394 = 1.04
23-25
80
30
Second Edition 2013 - 2014
= 1.3076 = 1.31
CV = * 100 = 1.31
X
1.2
2.35
f
13
10
12
2
1
n=38
48
40
1.6 - ( -0.56)
(n)
fx
=
n
14.44
= 1.71
X =
fd 2
-2 * -34 = 68
-1* -9 = 9
0*0=0
1*5=5
2 * 6 = 12
fd2 =94
fd
n
fx
0*17=0
1*9=9
2*6=12
3*5=15
4*3=12
x=48
-28
50
N I L E S H
f
17
9
6
5
3
n=40
Match B
d=x-A
fd
-2
17* -2 = -34
-1
9* -1 = -9
0
6* 0 = 0
1
5* 1 = 5
2
3* 2 = 6
fd= -32
P A
P A Z A R E
80
50
x
0
1
2
3
4
= 1.3432 = 1.34
x
13
14
15
16
17
( 53 )
CV =
-49
P A
1.8044
141
53
= 1.2864
CV =
(n)
(n)
fd 2
N I L E S H
fd
n
Ex (6):- The goals scored by two teams A and B in the football matches were as follows.
Goals:
0
1
2
3
4
Matches A:
27
9
8
4
5
B:
17
9
6
5
3
Find the team which is more consistent.
Ans:
Match A
x
f
fx
d=x-A
fd
fd 2
0
27
0*27=0
-2
27* -2 = -54
-2 * -54 = 108
1
9
1*9=9
-1
9* -1 = -9
-1* -9 = 9
fx
57
X =
=
2
8
2*8=16
0
8* 0 = 0
0*0=0
n
53
3
4
3*4=12
1
4* 1 = 4
1*4=4
X = 1.0755 = 1.08
4
5
4*5=20
2
5* 2 = 10
2 * 10 = 20
n=53
x=57
fd= -49
fd2 =141
Ex (7):- The following table gives the age distribution of boys and girls in a high school.
Find which of the tow groups is more variable in age.
Age in Years:
13
14
15
16
17
No.of Stu (boys):
12
15
15
5
3
(girls):
13
10
12
2
1
Ans:
Boys
x
f
fx
d=x-A
fd
fd 2
13 12
13*12=156
-2
12* -2 = -24
-2 * -24 = 48
14 15
14*15=210
-1
15* -1 = -15
-1* -15 = 15
fx
722
X =
=
15 15
15*15=225
0
15* 0 = 0
0*0=0
n
50
16 5
16*5=80
1
5* 1 = 5
1*5=5
X = 14.44
17 3
17*3=51
2
3* 2 = 6
2 * 6 = 12
n=50
x=722
fd= -28
fd2 =80
2.45
* 100 =
* 100
X
20
CV = 0.1225 * 100 = 12.25%
CV =
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
24
A Company
fd
f
-1* -100=100 30
0*0 = 0
420
1*260=260
120
2*160=320
30
fd2=680
n=600
fd
-1*30=-30
0*420=0
1*120=120
2*30=60
fd=150
= -1
CI
500-700
700-900
900-1100
1100-1300
CV =
* 100
XB =
A =
( 150
)
600
0.45 - (0.25)2 * 2
- 0.2844 * 2
B =
0.45 - 0.0625 * 2
* 2 = 0.9213 * 2
0.3875
* 100 =
1.85
21.07
B =
* 100
CVB =
* 2 = 0.6225 * 2
1.2449 = 1.25
B
XB
= -200 = -1
200
* 100 =
1.25
20.5
fd
fd2 fd 2
* c ,
=
* c
n
n
n
Put the values from above table and
A = 800, c = 200
* 100
24
CV =
* 100
XB = 800 + 17
* 200
61
= 800 + 0.2787 * 200
= 800 + 55.7377 = 855.7377
XB = 855.74
N I L E S H
A =
A =
A =
72
64
( 36
)
64
* 200
B =
CVA =
( 17
)
61
* 200
P A Z A R E
2
A =
31
61
179.8432
A
XA
= 179.84
B =
B =
B =
B =
0.43043
179.84
* 100 =
912.5
* 100
CVB =
131.2143 = 131.22
B
XB
131.22
* 100 =
855.74
* 100
B Suppliers lamps are more Uniform as their variation is less than the A Suppliers
lamps.
Ex (10):- An analysis of the monthly wages paid to workers in two firms A and B belonging to the same industries givs the following results:
Firm A
Firm B
No. of wage earners
Average monthly wage
Variance of the distribution
QDM notes for MBA
586.00
Rs. 52.50
Rs. 100.00
648.00
Rs. 47.50
Rs. 121.00
Second Edition 2013 - 2014
Ex (9):- A purchasing agent obtained samples of lamps from two suppliers A and B with
the following information.
Length of the Life hr: 500-700 700-900 900-1100
1100-1300
Supplier A:
10
16
30
8
Supplier B:
3
42
12
4
W hich Suppliers lamps are more uniform?
The Bulbs of B company are more Uniform and durable than the bulbs of A company
as the variation in B bulbs is less.
XA = 800 + 36
* 200
64
= 800 + 0.5625 * 200
= 800 + 112.5 = 912.5
XA = 912.5
CVA =
XA
B =
= 1.85
-1*-3=3
0*0 = 0
1*12=12
2*8=16
fd2=31
1.8426
- (0.5333)2 * 2
d =
X = A+
A =
*2
CVA =
270
600
CVA =
B =
P A Z A R E
1.1333
1.1333
0.8489
A =
*2
fd2
fd
-1*3=-3
0*42=0
1*12=12
2*4=8
fd=17
P A
A =
( 320
)
600
P A
A =
680
600
f
3
42
12
4
n=61
A =
N I L E S H
XB
-1* -10=10
0*0 = 0
1*30=30
2*16=32
fd2=72
20 + 150 * 2
600
= 20 + 0.25 * 2
= 20 + 0.5 = 20.5
= 20.5
XA = 20 + 320 * 2
600
= 20 + 0.5333 * 2
= 20 + 1.0667 = 21.0667
XA = 21.07
fd
-1*10= -10
0*16= 0
1*30=30
2*8=16
fd=36
fd
10
16
30
8
n=64
-1
0
1
2
fd
fd2 fd 2
* c ,
=
* c
n
n
n
Put the values from above table and
A = 20, c = 2
Xm
600
800
1000
1200
d = Xm- 20 = 18-20 = -2
2
2
2
= 18
fd
-1*-30=30
0*0 = 0
1*120=120
2*60=120
fd2=270
17+19 = 36
2
2
Xm =
fd
-1*100= -100
0*160= 0
1*260=260
2*80=160
fd=320
B Supplier
2
f
100
160
260
80
n=600
A Supplier
d
-1
0
1
2
Xm
18
20
22
24
Ans:
2
CI
17-19
19-21
21-23
23-25
B Company
2
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
25
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
Ans:-
x
n
X =
* 100
X
11
CV = 47.50 * 100
CV = 0.23147 * 100
CV = 23.15%
Ex (11):- A study of large number of workers revealed an average pulse rate of 81 beats er
minute and standard deviation 12.2 beats. Measurement of heights gave averages 66.9
inches and standard deviation 2.7 inches. Are the industrial workers more variable in
respect of pulse rate?
P A
CV = 15.06%
CV = 4.04%
P A Z A R E
1)
Skp =
X - z
X - Mean,
Me - Median,
or
2)
z - Mode,
Skp =
3( X - Me)
( N 2+1 )
Median ( Me )
th item
( 7+1
)
2
( 82 )
= ( 4 ) th item = 56
56
3)
Quartile Deivation
th item
Q 3 - Q1
2
Q1 =
N+1
4
th item
& Q3 =
3( N + 1 )
4
Q1 =
I L E
H
(N)
(
)S
Q1 =
( 7 4+ 1 )
th item
N+1
4
Q3 = 3( N+1)
4
th item
( 84 )
th item
Q1 =
( 3(74+ 1))
th item
th item
( 3 4* 8 )
th item
th item
P A Z A R E
Q1 = ( 2 ) th item =
53
Q1 = 56
Q 3 - Q1
64 - 53
Q. D. =
=
2
2
Quartile Deviation (Q.D.) = 5.6
4) Mean Deviation
x
d=x-X
46
46-61= -15
x
427
X=
=
53
53-61= -8
N
7
X = 61
54
54-61= -7
56
56-61= -5
= d = 72
60
60-61= -1
N
7
= 10.2857
64
64-61= 3
94
94-61= 33
= 10.29
x=427 d = 72
Mean Deviation ( ) = 10.29
and
Q3 = ( 5 ) th item
Q3 = 64
11
=
2
th item
( 24
4 )
64
5.6
5) Standard Deviation
d2
(-15)2= 225
d 2
1462
(-8)2= 64
=
=
N
7
(-7)2= 49
2
(-5) = 25
= 208.8571
(-1)2= 1
= 14.4519
(3)2= 9
= 14.45
(33)2= 1089
d2 = 1462
Standard Deviation () = 14.45
(Tip:- All the Methods can solve from only one example, so student practise all the
types from only one example for better understand and easy to solve any methods.)
- Standard deviation
25
Karl Person has stated a formula for relative measure of skewness. That is why, the
formula is known as Karl Persons Coefficient of Skewness. It is based on the difference between the Mean and Mode of the distribution which is divided by the standard
deviation. It is denoted by symbolically by Skp.
th item
Median (Me) =
427
= 61
7
Yes the industrial workers are more variable in pulse rate. Pulse rate variable is more
than the Height in inches.
94
7
Height in inches
X = 66.9, = 2.7
2.7
CV =
* 100
=
* 100
X
66.9
CV = 0.04035 * 100 = 4.035%
64
6
P A
Pulse Rate
X = 81, = 12.2
12.2
CV =
* 100 =
* 100
X
81
CV = 0.15061 * 100 = 15.06%
Ans:-
60
5
Factory B pays out more wages than factory A, and at the same it has greater variability
also.
N I L E S H
2)
56
4
x = X * n
x = 47.50 * 648
x = 30780 Rs.
1)
x = X * n
x = 52.50 * 586
x = 30765 Rs.
= 11
CV =
54
3
variance
=
121
x
n
X =
53
2
10
* 100
X
10
CV = 52.50 * 100
CV = 0.190476 * 100
CV = 19.05%
46
1
CV =
X:
N:
variance
= 100
Firm B
Firm A
Ex (12):- Find out the Arithmetic Mean, Median, Quartile Deviation, Mean Deviation ,
Standard Deviation from following given data.
53, 56, 64, 54, 46, 60, 94.
i) Which firm pays out the larger amount as monthly wages? and
ii) In which firm is there greater variability in individual wage?
26
Q.D. = Q3 - Q1
2
L = 18.5 , cf = 9 , f = 2 , c = 3
64.5 - 42.46
22.04
P A Z A R E
fd = 31 , fd2 = 123 , n = 22 , c = 3
d
- (
)
fd
n
n
x c =
31
- ( )
123
22
22
5.5909 - (1.40909) x 3
=
=
1.8988
3.6054 x 3
x 3
5.5909
x 3
- 1.9855
x 3
5.6963 =
5.70
5.5 - 3
Q1 = 15.5 + x 3
6
16.5 - 14
Q3 = 24.5 + x 3
4
CV =
* 100 =
5.70
= 26.83%
3N/4- cf
Q3 = L + x c
f
3N
3 x 22
66
=
=
= 16.5
4
4
4
L = 24.5,cf = 14, f = 4,
c=3
)x c
Q1 = L +
3N/4-cf
N/4-cf
x c & Q3 = L +
f
f
N/4 - cf
Q1 = L +
x c
f
N = 22,
N
22
=
= 5.5
4
4
L = 15.5, cf = 3, f = 6,
c=3
6) Standard Deviation ( )
Q3 - Q1
4) Quartile Deviation (QD) =
2
fd = 31 , n = 22 , c = 3
= 3 * 21.5 - 2 * 21.23
z = 3 Me - 2 X
fd
x c
n
= 31 x 3
22
3) Mode (z)
0.2232
N I L E S H
( N / 2 - cf)
11 - 9
2
x c = 18.5 +
x 3 = 18.5 +
x 3 = 18.5 + (1 x 3)
f
2
2
Me = 18.5 + 3 = 21.5
Me = L +
= 11
P A
P A Z A R E
N / 2 = 22 / 2
9.63
43.13
17 + (1.40909) * 3
2) Median (Me)
26.38-16.75
26.38+16.75
5) Mean Deviation ()
P A
31 * 3
22
17 +
Q 3 - Q1
Q3 + Q1
Coffiecient of Q.D. =
d = Xm - A = 11 - 17 = -6 = -2
c
3
3
= 4.815
N I L E S H
fd * c
n
9.63
2
1) Mean
X = A +
26.38-16.75 =
2
c = 12.5 - 9.5
c=3
fd2
-2 * -4 = 8
-1 * -1 = 1
0*0=0
1*2=2
2 * 6 = 12
3 * 12 = 36
4 * 16 = 64
fd2 = 123
f.d
2* -2= -4
1* -1= -1
6*0 = 0
2*1 = 2
3*2 = 6
4*3 = 12
4*4 = 16
fd= 31
21 = 11
2
d
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
cf
2
1+2=3
6+3=9
2+9=11
3+11=14
4+14=18
4+18=22
f
2
1
6
2
3
4
4
N=22
10+12
2
Xm =
Xm
11
14
17
20
23
26
29
C.I.
9.5-12.5
12.5-15.5
15.5-18.5
18.5-21.5
21.5-24.5
24.5-27.5
27.5-30.5
C.I.
10-12
13-15
16-18
19-21
22-24
25-27
28-30
2.5
Q3 = 24.5 + x 3
4
= 24.5 + 0.625 x 3
= 24.5 + 1.875
= 26.375
Q3 = 26.38
2.5
Q1 = 15.5 + x 3
6
= 15.5 + 0.4166 x 3
= 15.5 + 1.25
= 16.75
Q1 = 16.75
Ex (13):- Find out the Mean, Median, Mode, Quartile Deviation, Coefficient of QD, Mean
Deviation, Standard Deviation and coefficient of variation from following given data.
C.I. :
10-12 13-15 16-18 19-21 22-24 25-27 28-30
f:
2
1
6
2
3
4
4
Ans:- Since there is an inclusive class interval distribution, we shall convert it into
exclusive class interval series.
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
(Tip:- All the Methods can solve from only one example, so student practise all the
types of problems from only one example for better understand and easy to solve any
methods.)
26
27
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
dxdy
r
dxdy
2
dx dy
0.6745
1 - r2
n
Ex (1):- From the following table calculate the coefficient of correlation by Karl Pearsons
method. Arithmetic mean of X and Y variables are 6 and 8 respectively. Comment on the
result through the Probeable Error.
X: 6
2
10
8
Y: 9
11
8
7
27
When the X and Y of the variables are fractional figures, the computation
will be a tedious job. Under such circumstances, we can take the deviations from the
assumed means for the two variables (the next nearest whole number to the
actual mean preferably). Then we have the Short cut formula as under.
Reason for taking the factor 0.6745 is that in a normal distribution 50% of the observation lie in the range 0.6745 where is the mean and is the standard deviation.
These above formula are quite conveniently applied, if the X and Y of the variables are
integer or whole numbers.
P.E. =
P A Z A R E
P A
N I L E S H
n dx xdy
n
n
dxdy
n
x y
=
2
covariance
x y
dxdy
n
Actual Mean of y
Assumed Mean of y
P A
dxdy
Covariance
Y Ay -
Probable Error:
dy)2
n
Actual Mean of x
Assumed Mean of x
(c) Refer....
P A Z A R E
dxdy
n x y
dx ) ( dy )
= n ( X - Ax ) ( Y - Ay )
n
(b) Refer....
r =
X Ax -
N I L E S H
The formula may be presented as under.
dy
(a) Refer....
dx)2
n
(Note: Though the formula seems to be lengthy, the calculations are amazingly simplified.
r =
dx
Where, x = ( x - X ) = dx
y = ( y - Y ) = dy
xy
n x y
dx ) ( dy )
n
The formula is based on arithmetic mean and standard deviation and it is most
widely used. The formula indicates whether the correlation is positive or negative. The
answer lies between +1 and -1 (Perfect Positive and Negative correlation respectively).
Zero represents the absence of correlation.
Karl Pearsons coefficient of correlation is also known as the Product Moment
Coeficient. It is denoted by r which is the symbol of the degree of correlation between
the two variables. Coefficient of Correlation is the numberical measure of the amount
of correlation existing between the two variables X and Y, the subject and the relative
respectively. The variable which is used as the standard is called the subect, and the
variable which is compared with the subject is called the relative. The Coefficient is
calculated by dividing the product of all the deviations of each pair of observations from
their respective means by the product of the standard deviations of the two variables
multiplied by the number of items.
28
Y variable
N I L E S H
dxdy
r =
800
-26
= -0.9192
1 - r2
1 - (-0.9192)2
1 - 0.8449
0.1550
= 0.6745
= 0.6745
= 0.6745
n
2.2360
5
5
0.6745 x 0.06932
=
0.046756
= 0.04676
0.04676
6
36
12
dx
(-1)2= 1
(4)2= 16
(-1)2= 1
(y-24)/6
dy
(6-24)/6= -3
(36-24)/6= 2
(12-24)/6= -2
dy
(-3)2= 9
(2)2= 4
(-2)2= 4
N I L E S H
dxdy
-1 x -3 = 3
4 x2 = 8
-1 x -2 = 2
28
0.143
The two limits, within which all the rs of different samples fall are,
P A Z A R E
0.575
+ 0.143
0.718
0.575
- 0.143
0.432
Ex (3):- Calculate the coefficient of corelation between income and weight from the following data.
Income (Rs) X: 100
200
300
400
500
600
Weight (lbs) Y: 120
130
140
150
160
170
Ans:Computation of Coefficient of Correlation
x
(x-350)/50
dx
100
120 (100-350)/50= -5
200
130 (200-350)/50= -3
300
140 (300-350)/50= -1
400
150 (400-350)/50= 1
500
160 (500-350)/50= 3
600
170 (600-350)/50= 5
x=2100 y=870 dx=0
QDM notes for MBA
dx2
(y-145)/5
dy
(-5)2= 25 (120-145)/5=
(-3)2= 9 (130-145)/5=
(-1)2= 1 (140-145)/5=
(1)2= 1
(150-145)/5=
(3)2= 9
(160-145)/5=
(5)2= 25 (170-145)/5=
dx2=70
dy=0
dy2
-5
-3
-1
1
3
5
dxdy
(-5)2= 25
(-3)2= 9
(-1)2= 1
(1)2= 1
(3)2= 9
(5)2= 25
dy2=70
-5 x -5 = 25
-3 x -3 = 9
-1 x -1 = 1
1 x1 = 1
3 x3 = 9
5 x 5 = 25
dxdy= 70
30
60
30
(x-36)/6
dx
(30-36)/6= -1
(60-36)/6= 4
(30-36)/6= -1
1 - r2
1 - (0.575)2
1 - 0.3306
0.6693
= 0.6745
= 0.6745
= 0.6745
n
10
10
3.1623
0.6745 x 0.21164
=
0.1428 =
0.1428
= 0.575
83.4745
Ex (2):- Calculate the coefficient of corelation from the following data and calculate its
Probeable Error.
Marks in
Statistics(X):
30, 60, 30, 66, 72, 24, 18, 12, 42, 06
Account(Y):
06, 36, 12, 48, 30, 06, 24, 36, 30, 12
Ans:Computation of Coefficient of Correlation
6968
48
134 x 52
P.E. = 0.6745
P.E. =
x dy
48
= 24
P.E. = 0.6745
P.E. =
28.2842
P A Z A R E
r = -0.92
dx
48
=
2
240
10
y =
n
P A
40 x 20
-26
r = 0.575
P A
dx2 x dy2
-26
dxdy
r =
Y =
5 x 4 = 20
6 x1 = 6
-2 x -3 = 6
-3 x 0 = 0
-4 x -2 = 8
1 x -1 = 1
-5 x -2 = 10
dxdy= 48
dxdy
0 x1 = 0
-4 x 3 = -12
4 x -3 = -12
-2 x 0 = 0
2 x -1 = -2
dxdy= -26
= 36
(4)2= 16
(1)2= 1
(-3)2= 9
(0)2= 0
(2)2= 4
(1)2= 1
(-2)2= 4
dy2=52
dy2
(1)2= 1
(3)2= 9
(-3)2= 9
(0)2= 0
(-1)2= 1
dy2=20
360
10
dxdy
dy=(y-8)
9-8= 1
11-8= 3
5-8= -3
8-8= 0
7-8= -1
dy=0
dx2
(0)2= 0
(-4)2= 16
(4)2= 16
(-2)2= 4
(2)2= 4
dx2=40
dx=(x-6)
6-6= 0
2-6= -4
10-6= 4
4-6= -2
8-6= 2
dx=0
x =
n
X =
y
9
11
5
8
7
y=40
x
6
2
10
4
8
x=30
66
72
24
18
12
42
06
x=360
dy2
(y-24)/6
dy
(5)2= 25 (48-24)/6= 4
(6)2= 36 (30-24)/6= 1
(-2)2= 4
(6-24)/6= -3
(-3)2= 9
(24-24)/6= 0
(-4)2= 16 (36-24)/6= 2
(1)2= 1
(30-24)/6= 1
(-5)2= 25 (12-24)/6= -2
dx2=134
dy=0
(x-36)/6
dx
48
(66-36)/6= 5
30
(72-36)/6= 6
06
(24-36)/6= -2
24
(18-36)/6= -3
36
(12-36)/6= -4
30
(42-36)/6= 1
12
(6-36)/6= -5
y=240 dx=0
9+11+B+8+7
Y = y =
n
5
35
+
B
8 =
5
8 x 5 = 35 + B
40 = 35 + B
B = 40 - 35 = 5
B = 5
dx2
X = x = 6+2+10+A+8
n
5
26
+
A
6 =
5
6 x 5 = 26 + A
30 = 26 + A
A = 30 - 26 = 4
A = 4
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
X =
29
2100
= 350
6
870
6
y
=
n
Y =
= 145
490
= 1
70
dx)2
n
2
dx ) ( dy )
n
dy2 -
dx2
(5) = 25
(-15)2= 225
(-15)2= 225
(15)2= 225
(25)2= 625
(10)2= 100
dx2=1425
1425 -
29
15)2
6
dxdy
-5 x 0 = 0
-15 x 10=-150
-15 x 10=-150
15 x -20=-300
15 x -30=-750
10 x -15=-150
dxdy=-1500
( 15 ) ( -45 )
6
2
1725 - -45)
6
-1500
dy)2
n
P A Z A R E
-1500
dy2
(0) = 0
(10)2= 100
(10)2= 100
(-20)2= 400
(-300)2= 900
(-15)2= 225
dy2=1725
dy=(y-40)
(40-40)= 0
(50-40)= 10
(50-40)= 10
(20-40)= -20
(10-40)= -30
(25-40)= -15
dy=-45
1425 - 2256
-675
6
1725 - 2025
6
-1500 - ( -112.5)
r
-1500 + 112.5
1425 - 37.5
1725 - 337.5
-1387.5
=
37.25 x 37.25
-1387.5
1387.5
1387.5
1387.5
-1
Put
y
dx=(x-65)
40
(60-65)= -5
50
(50-65)= -15
50
(50-65)= -15
20
(80-65)= 15
10
(90-65)= 25
25
(75-65)= 10
y=195 dx=15
x
60
50
50
80
90
75
x=405
dx
N I L E S H
-1
= 32.5
dxdy
1387.5
(Note: 67.5 - 2.5 = 65 & 32.5 + 7.5 = 40, put the assumed mean 65 & 40 and solve it, the
answer is come same.)
(Note: Deviation are taken from the assumed means and the short cut formula is used.
Because actual means 67.5 and 32.5 are in fractions. 67.5 - 7.5 = 60 & 32.5 + 2.5 = 35)
1387.5
P A
195
6
-1387.5
1387.5
-1500 + 112.5
y =
n
-1387.5
=
37.25 x 37.25
Y =
dxdy
0 x5 = 0
-10 x 15=-150
-10 x 15=-150
20 x -15=-300
30 x -25=-750
15 x -10=-150
dxdy=-1500
405 = 67.5
6
dy2
(5)2= 25
(15)2= 225
(15)2= 225
(-15)2= 225
(-25)2= 625
(-10)2= 100
dy2=1425
-1500 - ( -112.5)
x =
n
dy=(y-35)
(40-35)= 5
(50-35)= 15
(50-35)= 15
(20-35)= -15
(10-35)= -25
(25-35)= -10
dy=-15
P A
X =
dx2
(0)2= 0
(-10)2= 100
(-10)2= 100
(20)2= 400
(30)2= 900
(15)2= 225
dx2=1725
r = -1
1425 - 225
6
y
dx=(x-60)
40
(60-60)= 0
50
(50-60)= -10
50
(50-60)= -10
20
(80-60)= 20
10
(90-60)= 30
25
(75-60)= 15
y=195 dx=45
-675
6
1725 - 2025
6
P A Z A R E
1425 - -15)
6
L
Ex (4):- Calculate Karl Persons coefficient of corelation between percentages of pass
and failure from the following data.
No. of Student: 800
600
900
700
500
400
No. of Passed: 480
300
450
560
450
300
Ans:- Let us convert the data into the number of students passed and failed.
No. of Student:
800
600
900
700
500
400
No. of Passed (X):
480
300
450
560
450
300
No. of Failed (Y):
320
300
450
140
050
100
Pass % (X) :
060
050
050
080
090
075
Fail % (Y):
040
050
050
020
010
025
N I L E S H
45)2
6
-1500
x
60
50
50
80
90
75
x=405
1725 -
r = 1
70 x 70
70
( 45 ) ( -15 )
6
dx2 x dy2
70
70
dxdy
-1500
r
The deviation are divided by common factor and short cut method adopted.
r =
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
30
dxdy
Average Profit =
Profit
No. of shops
&
Average Profit =
7200
= 600
12
&
dx
dx)2
n
46
36
6
-22 - 3
r
19 - 1.5
-25
=
4.1833 x 6.3245
-25
=
46 - 6
-25
26.4575
17.5
(x-320)/10
dx2
(y-140)/10
dy2
dx
dy
600
100 (600-320)/10=28 784
(100-140)/10= -4
16
300
200 (300-320)/10= -2 4
(200-140)/10= 6
36
400
300 (400-320)/10= 8
64
(300-140)/10= 16
256
150
50
(150-320)/10= -17 289
(50-140)/10= -9
81
180
60
(180-320)/10= -14 196
(60-140)/10= -8
64
x=1630 y=710
dx= 3
dx2=1337
dy= 1
dy2=453
x
P A Z A R E
x
=
n
X =
1630
= 326
5
1337 -
-0.94491
30
Y =
y
=
n
710
5
28 x -4 = -112
-2 x 6=-12
8 x 16=128
-17 x -9=153
-14 x -8=112
dxdy=269
= 142
(Note: Deviations are taken from the assumed means. i.e. 326-6 = 320 & 142-2 = 140)
dx ) ( dy )
dxdy n
r
=
2
dx)
dy)2
2
dx2 dy
n
n
269
40
dxdy
3)2
5
(3)(1)
5
453
1)2
5
Second Edition 2013 - 2014
9
6
19
N I L E S H
18
6
-6)2
6
46 -
- 25
dy)2
n
( -3 ) ( -6 )
6
-3)2
6
19 -
1200
= 100
12
dy
-25
r
dx ) ( dy )
n
Advert. Expenses
No. of Shops
P A
P A
dxdy
Average A.E. =
We are taking assumed means. In Y varaible we are dividing the deviation by the common
factor. So a short cut formula is used.
P A Z A R E
N I L E S H
Ex (6):- Find Pearsonian coefficient of correlation between average profits and average
advertisement expenditure per shop and interpret. calculate its Probeable Error.
No. of shops:
12
18
25
20
10
Total Profit (Rs):
7200
5400
10000 3000
1800
Total Advertisement Exp(Rs): 1200
3600
7500
1000
600
Ans:- Let us obtain the average profits and average advertisement expenses X & Y.
-3 x 2= -6
-2 x 1= -2
-1 x 0=0
0 x -1= 0
1 x -2= -2
2 x -6= -12
dxdy=-22
0.014
(y-50)/5
dy2
dy
(60-50)/5= 2
4
(55-50)/5= 1
1
(50-50)/5= 0
0
(45-50)/5= -1
1
(40-50)/5= -2
4
(20-50)/5= -6
9
dy=-6
dy2=46
% of
y
60
55
50
45
40
20
(x-23.5)
dx2
dx
20.5-23.5=-3
9
21.5-23.5=-2
4
22.5-23.5=-1
1
23.5-23.5=0
0
24.5-23.5=1
1
25.5-23.5=2
4
dx=-3
dx2=19
P.E. =
M.V.
x
20.5
21.5
22.5
23.5
24.5
25.5
Age
C.I.
20-21
21-22
22-23
23-24
24-25
25-26
1 - r2
1 - (-0.95)2
1 - 0.9025
0.04975
= 0.6745
= 0.6745
= 0.6745
n
2.44948
6
6
0.6745 x 0.02031
=
0.01369
= 0.014
P.E. = 0.6745
how to find mid value --> (20+21) / 2 = 41 / 2 = 20.5 (Like that find others)
how to find % -->
(72 / 120) * 100 = 60%
(55 / 100) * 100 = 55%
r = -0.95
Ex (5):- Following are the results of B.Com. examination in a college. Compute coefficient
of correlation between age and sucess in the examination and interpret the result. calculate its Probeable Error.
Age of Candidates: 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26
Candi. Appeared:
120
100
70
40
10
5
Successful Cand:
72
55
35
18
4
1
Ans:- Let us obtain the Mid-value of age group and convert the successful candidates into
percentages.
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
31
269
r
=
9
5
453
1
5
269 - ( 0.6 )
268.4
=
36.54 x 21.279
r = 0.3451
0.3451
0.2659
0.2659
0.3451
- 0.2659
0.0792
X =
P A Z A R E
x
n
320
8
= 40
Y =
dxdy
dx
dx)2
n
y
=
n
1482.78
= 185.35
8
dx ) ( dy )
n
dy
dxdy
-5 x -5 = 25
1 x 1= 1
-1 x -1= 1
5 x 5= 25
3 x 2= 6
-3 x -2= 6
dxdy=64
(y-185)
dy2
dxdy
dy
55-185= 130
16900 910
66.67-185= 118.33 14002 591.65
100-185= 85
7225 255
111.11-185= -73.89 5460 73.89
150-185= -35
1225 -35
200-185= 15
225
45
300-185= 115
13225 575
500-185= 315
99225 2205
dy
dy2
dxdy
2.78
157487 4620.54
dy)2
n
31
dy2
25
1
1
25
4
4
dy2=60
dy = (y-15)
(10-15) = -5
(16-15) = 1
(14-15) = -1
(20-15) = 5
(17-15) = 2
(13-15) = -2
dy= 0
dx=(x-450)/50
dx2
(200-450)/50= -5
25
(500-450)/50= 1
1
(400-450)/50= -1
1
(700-450)/50= 5
25
(600-450)/50= 3
9
(300-450)/50= -3
9
dx= 0
dx2=70
(x-40)/5
dx2
P.Lakh
dx
y
(5-40)/5 = -7
49
55.00
(15-40)/5 = -5 25
66.67
(25-40)/5 = -3 9
100
(35-40)/5 = -1 1
111.11
(45-40)/5 =1
1
150
(55-40)/5 =3
9
200
(65-40)/5 =5
25
300
(75-40)/5 =7
49
500
dx
dx2
y
0
168 1482.78
M.V.
x
05
15
25
35
45
55
65
75
x
320
300
30 = 10
Age
C.I.
0-10
10-20
20-30
30-40
40-50
50-60
60-70
70-80
No. of Deaths
Population
Blind
x 100
No. of persons
P A
P A
P A Z A R E
=
N I L E S H
Ex (7):- With the following data in six cities calculate the coefficient of correlation by pearsons
method between the density of population and death rate.
City:
A
B
C
D
E
F
Density of population:
200
500
400
700
600
300
Population (in 000):
30
90
40
42
72
24
No. of Deaths:
300
1440
560
840
1224
312
Ans:- Let us obtain the death rate as under.
Death Rate
Ex (8):- The following table gives the distribution of the total population and those who are
totally or partially blind among them. Find out if there is any relation between age and
blindness. Calculate its Probeable Error.
Age in years:
0-10
10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 60-70 70-80
No. of persons
(000s):
100
60
40
36
24
11
6
3
Blind:
55
40
40
40
36
22
18
15
Ans:- Let us obtain the Mid values of age groups and blind men per one lakh persons.
N I L E S H
The two limits, within which all the rs of different samples fall are,
0.3451
+ 0.2659
0.6110
0.2659 =
= 15
1 - r2
1 - (0.3451)2
1 - 0.1192
0.8808
= 0.6745
= 0.6745
= 0.6745
n
5
5
2.2361
0.6745 x 0.3939 =
r = 0.9875
P.E. =
452.8
P.E. = 0.6745
268.4
777.5429
1335.2
90
6
453 - 0.2
y
=
n
1337 - 1.8
268.4
=
Y =
2700
= 450
6
(Note:- When dx = 0 and dy = 0 then use the following formula to find the value of r
dxdy
64
64
64
r =
=
=
=
= 0.98754
2
2
dx x dy
70 x 60
4200
64.8074
x
n
X =
1337
3
5
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
32
4620.54 r
-1500
4620.54 - 0
4620.54
5154.70
4620.54
168
=
157486.04
0.8964
0.04685=
368
122
164.30
556
- 13924
30
309
8649
30
P A Z A R E
368 - 365.8
2.2
43.609
2.2
91.87 20.7
=
0.0505
0.0505
Ex (12):- Coefficient of correlation between two variates x and y is 0.8. Their covariance is
20. The variance of x is 16. Find the standard deviation of y series.
Ans:- r = xy
1
= xy x
n x y
n
x y
0.8 = 20 x
0.8 = 20 x
16 x y
1
4 x y
0.8 x 4 = 20 x
QDM notes for MBA
3.2 = 20
y
y =
E
32
10974
30
Ex (10):- Calculate the coefficient of correlation between the X and Y series from the
following data:
Series A
Series B
Arithmetic Mean
74.5
125.5
Assumed Mean ( A )
69.0
112.0
Standard Deviation ()
13.07
15.85
Sum of the products of deviation of X and Y from their assumed means +2176 and no. of
pairs of observation is 8.
93)2
30
122
=
15 x 3.162 x 3.464
309
556 -
P A
122
15 x 10 x 12
118)2
30
N I L E S H
r
0.7425
( 118 ) (93 )
30
0.0469
dxdy
n x y
368 -
P A
0.9546
0.0469
P A Z A R E
r
Ex (11):- Calculate the correlation coeficient between the variables X and Y from the
following data.
x = 118
y = 93 x2 = 556
y2 = 309
xy = 368
n = 30
x ) ( y )
Ans:
xy n
r
=
2
x)
y)2
x2 y2 n
n
Ex (9):- Calculate the coefficient of correlation between X and Y series from the following
data:
Series A
Series B
No. of Pairs (n)
15
15
Variance ( )
10
12
Summation of products of deviation of x and y series from their respective mean is 122.
Ans:-
1582
1657.276
N I L E S H
=
= 0.9546
1 - r2
1 - (0.8964)2
1 - 0.80353
0.19647
= 0.6745
= 0.6745
= 0.6745
n
2.82842
8
8
0.6745 x 0.06946
2176 - 594
1657.276
P.E. = 0.6745
r = 0.8964
- 7.7284
8
0
8
157487
0
6
2.78)2
8
168
P.E. =
157487
0)2
8
168 -
( 0 ) (2.78 )
8
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
20
3.2
y =
6.25
Standard deviation of y series is 6.25
Second Edition 2013 - 2014
33
6 d2
n3 - n
rs
6 x 119
10 x (100 - 1)
714
990
P A Z A R E
rs
rs
rs
=
=
1 0.28
1 -
1 -
0.7212 = 0.2788
( Very Low Degree of Positive Correlation )
as same.
33
K L
49 43
11 12
11 12
Ex (2): Find the Spearmans Rank Correlation Coefficient from following data.
Student Hindi(X) English(Y) Rx
Ry
D=Rx - Ry
D2 = D x D
A
5
7
5
5.5
5 - 5.5= -0.5
-0.5 x -0.5= 0.25
B
9
5
1
7
1 - 7 = -6
-6 x -6 = 36
C
7
7
2.5
5.5
2.5 - 5.5= -3
-3 x -3 = 9
D
4
8
7
3.5
7 - 3.5= 3.5
3.5 x 3.5 = 12.25
E
4
9
7
2
7-2=5
5 x 5 = 25
F
7
2
2.5
9
2.5 - 9 = -6.5
-6.5 x -6.5= 42.25
G
1
0
10
10
10 - 10 = 0
0 x0 = 0
H
3
8
9
3.5
9 - 3.5 = 5.5
5.5 x 5.5= 30.25
I
6
4
4
8
4 - 8 = -4
-4 x -4 = 16
J
4
10
7
1
7-1=6
6 x 6 = 36
N=10
D = 0
D2 = 207
F G H
I
J
52 52 52 52
50
6 7 8 9
10
7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
10
6+7+8+9 =30 = 7.5
4
4
more than value comes
6 D2
N(N2 - 1)
6 x 119
1 10 x (102 - 1)
6 x 119
1 10 x 99
1 -
A
B
C D E
58
58
55 55 55
1
2
3 4 5
1.5
1.5
4 4 4
1+2 = 3 =1.5 3+4+5 =12 = 4
Method -->
2
2
3
3
From above method to find the actual Rank, when 2 or
This method is same as find the value of mean.
Student
Marks(X)
Rough Rank
Correct Rank
L
43
12
In above example, the value 58 come 2 time and its rank give 1.5. How to give the rank 1.5,
we see the following example.
Ex (3)
K
49
11
P A
G H
I J
55 35 39 28
3 8
7 10
J
50
10
A
B C D E F
58 53 33 51 58 48
1.5 4
9 5 1.5 6
I
52
7.5
D2 = 119
Student
Mraks(X)
Rank(R)
H
52
7.5
N I L E S H
N=10,
Student
A B C D E F
G H
I J
Marks(X)
60 43 35 62 25 38 19 27 23 41
Rank(R)
2 3
6 1 8 5
10 7
9 4
In above example, the ranks taken in descending order mean rank started from biggest
value and every marks come only one time so it is simple to find the rank
Ex (2)
G
52
7.5
Note:- The value of D is always come zero ( 0 ), then your finding rank is correct. If the
value of D is not come zero ( 0 ), then you finding rank is wrong.
P A
P A Z A R E
F
52
7.5
Ex (1): Find the Spearmans Rank Correlation Coefficient from following data.
Student Mark(X) Mark(Y)
Rx
Ry
D=Rx - Ry
D2 = D x D
A
32
58
6
3
6-3=3
3 x3 = 9
B
19
28
9.5
10
9.5 - 10= -0.5
-0.5 x -0.5= 0.25
C
71
32
3
8.5
3 - 8.5= -5.5
-5.5 x -5.5= 30.25
D
43
32
5
8.5
5 - 8.5= -3.5
-3.5 x -3.5= 12.25
E
80
34
2
7
2-7=5
5 x 5 =25
F
19
40
9.5
6
9.5 - 6= 3.5
3.5 x 3.5= 12.25
G
31
50
7
5
7-5=2
2 x2 = 4
H
24
52
8
4
8-4=4
4 x 4 = 16
I
97
60
1
2
1 - 2 = -1
-1 x -1 = 1
J
54
64
4
1
4-1=3
3 x3 = 9
N=10
D = 0
D2 = 119
In the ranking systems, the biggest item gets the first rank, the next to it gets the
second rank and so on.
Ex (1)
E
55
4
N I L E S H
D
55
4
number six
numerical difference between corresponding paris of ranks
number of pairs
sum of squares of d
The
The
The
The
or
6 d2
n (n2 - 1)
C
55
4
Where,
6
d
n
d 2
1 -
B
58
1.5
A
58
1.5
rs
Student
Marks(X)
Rank
The formula is based on the ranks of the variables according to their sizes.
Following are the circumstances when the Rank Correlation coefficient is used.
(i) In a beauty contest, cooking contest, flower show contest and interview involving selections, we can use the rank correlation coefficient.
(ii) If the data are irregular or extreme items are erratic or inaccurate, we can use the rank
correlation coefficient.
Under this method of rank correlation coefficient, the individual items of variables
(x and y) are arranged in order of their ranks. We can apply this method only to individual
observations, but not to frequency distributions. In the process of ranking, the original
vaues are not taken into account, but only the ranks are assigned on the basis of original
values. The Ranks Correlation Coefficient is denoted symbolically rs.
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
34
D2 = 119
Ex (4): Find the Spearmans Rank Correlation Coefficient from following data.
rs
=
=
1 -
6 x 207
10 x (100 - 1)
1620
990
1 1.6364 = - 0.6364
- 0.6364
( Moderate Degree of Negative Correlation )
1 0.3864 = 0.6136
0.6136
( Moderate Degree of Positive Correlation )
1 -
0.7818
0.21818 =
0.7818
P A Z A R E
histry(X) Geog.(Y)
98
60
85
40
102
75
112
84
120
98
102
75
106
85
108
84
95
54
103
75
106
83
Note:- The value of D is always come zero ( 0 ), then your finding rank is correct. If the
value of D is not come zero ( 0 ), then you finding rank is wrong.
34
Ry
9
11
7
3.5
1
7
2
3.5
10
7
5
D2 = D x D
0x0=0
0x0=0
0.5 x 0.5 = 0.25
-1.5 x -1.5 = 2.25
0x0=0
0.5 x 0.5 = 0.25
2.5 x 2.5 = 6.25
-0.5 x -0.5 = 0.25
0x0=0
-1 x -1 = 1
-0.5 x -0.5 = 0.25
D2 = 10.5
D=Rx - Ry
0
0
0.5
-1.5
0
0.5
2.5
-0.5
0
-1
-0.5
D = 0
6 D2
N(N2 - 1)
6 x 10.5
11 x (112 - 1)
6 x 10.5
11 x 120
1 -
1 -
0.95228
rs
1 -
rs
1 -
rs
1 -
0.9522
rs
QDM notes for MBA
Rx
9
11
7.5
2
1
7.5
4.5
3
10
6
4.5
0.0.4772 =
6 x 10.5
11 x (121 - 1)
63
1320
=
=
1 -
1 -
6 x 36
10 x (100 - 1)
216
990
rs
6 x 207
12 x (144 - 1)
663
1716
1 -
1 -
rs
rs
1 -
P A
Student
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
N=11
Ex (5): Find the Spearmans Rank Correlation Coefficient from following data.
rs
6 D2
N(N2 - 1)
1 - 6 x 110.50
12 x (122 - 1)
6 x 110.50
1 12 x 143
1 -
rs
6 D2
N(N2 - 1)
6 x 36
10 x (102 - 1)
6 x 36
10 x 99
N I L E S H
1 -
rs
D2 = 119
rs
D2 = D x D
-2 x -2 = 4
1x1=1
0.5 x 0.5 = 0.25
-3 x -3 = 9
0x0=0
3.5 x 3.5 = 12.25
-2.5 x -2.5 = 6.25
1.5 x 1.5 = 2.25
1x1=1
0x0=0
D2 = 36
D=Rx - Ry
1 - 3 = -2
2-1=1
3.5 - 3 = 0.5
3.5 - 6.5= -3
5 - 5= 0
6.5 - 3 = 3.5
6.5 - 9 = -2.5
8 - 6.5 = 1.5
9-8=1
10 - 10 = 0
D = 0
N=10,
rs
Ry
3
1
3
6.5
5
3
9
6.5
8
10
P A Z A R E
Rx
1
2
3.5
3.5
5
6.5
6.5
8
9
10
N I L E S H
D2 = D x D
-0.5 x -0.5= 0.25
-1.5 x -1.5= 2.25
-0.5 x -0.5 = 0.25
1 x1 = 1
-5.5 x -5.5 = 30.25
-1 x -1 = 1
2 x2 = 4
5 x 5 = 25
-2 x -2 = 4
1.5 x 1.5 = 2.25
-2 x -2 = 4
5.5 x 5.5 = 30.25
-2.5 x -2.5 = 6.25
D2 = 110.50
P A
D=Rx - Ry
5 - 5.5= -0.5
9.5 - 11= -1.5
11.5 - 12= -0.5
2-1=1
3.5 - 9 = -5.5
7 - 8 = -1
7-5=2
7-2=5
1 - 3 = -2
11.5 - 10 = 1.5
5 - 7 = -2
9.5 - 4 = 5.5
6 - 3.5 = -2.5
D = 0
Ry
5.5
11
12
1
9
8
5
2
3
10
7
4
6
Rx
5
9.5
11.5
2
3.5
7
7
7
1
11.5
5
9.5
3.5
Chem(Y)
7
11
12
1
9
8
5
2
3
10
7
4
6
Test(Y)
16
19
16
12
14
16
8
12
11
6
1 -
Test(X)
22
21
19
19
17
16
16
15
13
12
rs
Student
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
N=10
rs
rs
6 D2
1 N(N2 - 1)
6 x 207
1 10 x (102 - 1)
6 x 207
1 10 x 99
Ex (3): Find the Spearmans Rank Correlation Coefficient from following data.
Student Phy(X)
A
5
A
45
B
40
C
62
D
60
E
48
F
48
G
48
H
65
I
40
J
55
K
45
L
60
N=12
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
35
Regression:-
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
x =
( x - x )
n
dxn
and
y for ( y - y ) = dy
y =
( y -ny )
dyn
I
Correlation Measure (Karl Pearsons Coefficient of Correlation):
(Basic Equation)
(Secondary Eq.)
X=a+bY
x = na + b y
xy = a y + b y2
= byx * bxy
The product of the both regression coefficient and root of it the resultant will always be
Correlation. The value of byx and bxy individually both cannot be more than 1. If one is
more than 1, the other must be less than 1. Both the regression coefficients will have the
same algebric signs. Either both of them would be positive or both of them would be
negative. It is not possible that one has a positive sign and the other is a negative sign.
The reason is that the standard deviations are always positive. Only the Coefficient of
Correlation can be either positive or negative.
P A Z A R E
Sometimes we find the means are in fractions. This makes the deviations and their
squares are also in fractions. To avoid the tedious calculations, we can have the assumed
means in round figures. Then, to find regression coefficients we can use the following
procedure.
byx =
ndxdy - ( dx )( dy )
2
ndx
- ( dx )
bxy =
ndxdy - ( dx )( dy )
ndy2 - ( dy )2
x=(x-x )
x
( x - x ) = r y
(y-y )
35
( x - x ) = bxy ( y - y )
and
byx * bxy
y
( y - y ) = r x ( x - x )
= r2
y=(y-y )
r x r
x
xy
=
y
y2
N I L E S H
( y - y ) = byx ( x - x )
y
x
x r
=
x
y
bxy = r
x= a+ by
and
y= a+ bx
xy
x2
x on y
r2
In the above mathematical simplication, the constant a disappears from the calculations
and the basic formulas are changed to,
y on x
xy = a y + b y2
xy = a (0) + b y2
xy = b y2
xy
bxy =
y2
x
bxy = r
y
dy
P A
P A Z A R E
xy = a x + b x2
xy = a (0) + b x2
xy = b x2
xy
byx =
x2
y
byx = r
x
byx * bxy = r
P A
Regression Coefficient: Deviations are taken from actual mean. In case of secondary
equation, x and y stand for zero and the equation are reduced to small size as under.
dx
N I L E S H
Y=a+bX
y = na + b x
xy = a x + b x2
dy
xy
Regression Equation of X on Y :-
y
x
byx = r
Regression Equation of Y on X :-
dx
With the help of regression coefficient, to find the Coefficient of Correlation as under:
dxdy
(i) x on y .............. x = a + by
Regression means returning or stepping back to the average value. With the
help of values of one variable (indepedent) we can establish most likely values of other
variable (dependent). On the basis of two available correlated variables, we can forecast
the future data or events or values.
In statistics, the term Regression means simply the Average Relationship.
We can predict or estimate the values of dependent variable from the given related values
of independent variable with the help of a Regression Technique. The Measure of Regression studes the nature of correlationship to estimate the most probable values. Its establishes a functional relationship between the Independent and Dependent variables.
36
Observe the both the method the value of y is come same i.e. 20.6
140
5
= 28
y on x
( y - y ) = bxy ( x - x )
( y - 16) = 0.8696( x - 28)
( y - 16) = 0.8696x - 24.3478
y = 0.8696x - 24.9478 + 16
y = 0.8696x - 8.3478
Y =y = 80 = 16
n
5
Observe the both the method the value of y is come same i.e. 36.8714
36
y = 1.3x + 1.1
y = 1.3 * 15 + 1.1
y = 19.5 + 1.1
y = 20.6
x =
n
X =
y=(y - y )
x2
xy
10-16= -6
64
36
12-16= -4
16
16
14-16= -2
4
4
18-16= 2
36
4
26-16= 10
64
100
y = 0x2=184 xy=160
x = (x - x )
20-28= -8
24-28= -4
26-28= -2
34-28= 6
36-28= 8
x = 0
25 = 5
5
x
y
20
10
24
12
26
14
34
18
36
26
x=140 y=80
P A
y =
n
( y - y ) = bxy ( x - x )
( y - 5 ) = 1.3 ( x - 3)
( y - 5 ) = 1.3x - 3.9
y = 1.3x - 3.9 + 5
y = 1.3x + 1.1
Y =
y on x
= 3
15
5
P A Z A R E
Other Alternative
Method
x =
n
y=(y - y )
x
xy
2-5 = -3
4
6
5-5 = 0
1
0
3-5 = -2
0
0
8-5 = 3
1
3
7-5 = 2
4
4
y = 0 x2=10 xy=13
2400 = 140a+4104b
- 2240= 140a+ 3920b
160=
184b
b = 160 / 184 = 0.8696
X =
x = (x - x )
1-3= -2
2-3= -1
3-3= 0
4-3=1
5-3= 2
x = 0
N I L E S H
Other Alternative
Method
x
y
1
2
2
5
3
3
4
8
5
7
x=15 y=25
80 = 5a + 140b
80 = 5a + 140 x 0.8696
80 = 5a + 121.74
80 - 121.74 = 5a
- 41.74 = 5a
a = - 41.74 / 5 = - 8.3478
y = a + bx
y = -8.3478+ 0.8696x
put x = 52
y = -8.3478+ 0.8696 * 52
y = -8.3478 +45.2192 = 36.8714
y = 36.8714
P A Z A R E
P A
88 = 15a + 55b
( - )75 = 15a + 45b
13 =
10b
b = 13 / 10 = 1.3
N I L E S H
25 = 5a + 15b
25 = 5a + 15 x 1.3
25 = 5a + 19.5
25 - 19.5 = 5a
5.5 = 5a
a = 5.5 / 5 = 1.1
y = a + bx
y = 1.1 + 1.3x
put x = 15
y = 1.1 + 1.3 * 15
y = 1.1 + 19.5 = 20.6
y = 20.6
y on x
y on x
Ex (2):- By using the simultaneous equations method, find out the most probable value of
y, when x = 52.
x:
20
24
26
34
36
y:
10
12
14
18
26
Ans:x
y
x2
xy
20
10
400
200
24
12
576
288
26
14
676
364
34
18
1156
612
36
26
1296
936
x=140 y=80 x2=4104 xy=2400
Ex (1):- By using the simultaneous equations method, find out the most probable value of
y, when x = 15.
x:
1
2
3
4
5
y:
2
5
3
8
7
Ans:x
y
x2
xy
1
2
1
2
2
5
4
10
3
3
9
9
4
8
16
24
5
7
25
35
x=15 y=25 x2=55
xy=88
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
37
y on x
y = bx
290
10
y
=
n
xy ( y - y )
y2
y - 29 = 0.7624 ( x - 36 )
y - 29 = 0.7624x - 27.4464
y = 0.7624x - 27.4464 + 29
y = 0.7624x + 1.5536
x - 36 = 0.8261 ( y - 29 )
x - 36 = 0.8261y - 23.9569
x = 0.8261y -23.9569 + 36
x = 0.8261y + 12.0431
21 ( y - 5 )
28
P A Z A R E
y - 5 = 0.75 ( x - 8 )
y - 5 = 0.75x - 6
y = 0.75x - 6 + 5
y = 0.75x - 1
b) When x = 12
y = 0.75x - 1
y = 0.75 * 12 - 1
y= 9 - 1
y= 8
x - 8 = 0.75 ( y - 5 )
x - 8 = 0.75y - 3.75
x = 0.75y -3.75 + 8
x = 0.75y + 4.25
c)
byx =
xy
=
x2
21
,
28
byx = 0.75
bxy =
&
xy 21
=
y2 28
bxy = 0.75
byx * bxy
0.75 x 0.75
0.5625
0.75
When x = 12 then y = 8
byx * bxy
0.7624 x 0.8261
8 months 12 days
0.6298
0.7936
37
xy
494
xy
494
byx = 2 =
, bxy = 2 =
x
648
y
594
byx = 0.7624
& bxy = 0.8261
(x- 8 )=
c)
x on y
x = by
( x - x ) = xy2 ( y - y )
y
21 ( x - 8 )
28
= 5
( x - 36 ) = 494 ( y - 29 )
598
(y- 5 )=
( y - 29 ) = 494 ( x - 36 )
648
35
7
P A
(x- x )=
P A
xy ( x - x )
x2
y =
n
N I L E S H
y on x
y = bx
( y - y ) = xy2 ( x - x )
x
x on y
x = by
P A Z A R E
(y- y )=
a)
= 29
Y =
Y =
= 36
= 8
360
10
56
7
x
=
n
x =
n
a)
N I L E S H
X =
X =
Ex (4):- Find the Regression equations for the following data and determine the value of
coefficient of correleation through reqression equation and also predict the average of
value of Y when X is 12
X: 11 7 9
5 8
6 10
Y: 7
5 3
2 6
4 8
Ans:x
y
x = (x- x )
y = (y- y )
x2
y2
xy
2
2
11
7
11-8 = 3
7-5= 2
(3) = 9
(2) = 4
3 x 2= 6
7
5
7-8 = -1
5-5= 0
(-1)2 = 1
(0)2 = 0
-1 x 0= 0
9
3
9-8 = 1
3-5= -2
(1)2 = 1
(-2)2 = 4
1 x -2= -2
5
2
5-8 = -3
2-5= -3
(-3)2 = 9
(-3)2 = 9
-3 x -3= 9
8
6
8-8 = 0
6-5= 1
(0)2 = 0
(1)2 = 1
1 x 0= 0
6
4
6-8 = -2
4-5= -1
(-2)2 = 4
(-1)2 = 1
-2 x -1= 2
10
8
10-8 = 2
8-5= 3
(2)2 = 4
(3)2 = 9
2 x 3= 6
x=56 y=35
x= 0
y= 0
x2=28
y2=28
xy=21
Ex (3):- The following data relate to the ages of husbands and wife.
Age of Husband x:
25 28 30 32 35 36 38 39 42 55
Age of Wife y:
20 26 29 30 25 18 26 35 35 46
Obtain the two regression equation and Determine the value of coefficient of correlation
and estimate the age of husband for the age ow wife 25 years.
Ans:x
y
x = (x- x )
y = (y- y )
x2
y2
xy
2
2
25
20
25-36 = -11
20-29= -9
(-11) =121 (-9) =81
-11 x -9= 99
28
26
28-36 = -8
26-29= -3
(-8)2 =64
(-3)2 =9
-8 x 3= 24
30
29
30-36 = -6
29-29= 0
(-6)2 =36
(0)2 =0
-6 x 0= 0
32
30
32-36 = -4
30-29= 1
(-4)2 =16
(1)2 =1
-4 x 1= -4
35
25
35-36 = -1
25-29= -4
(-1)2 =1
(-4)2 =16
-1 x -4= 4
36
18
36-36 = 0
18-29= -11 (0)2 = 0
(-11)2 =121 0 x 11= 0
38
26
38-36 = 2
26-29= -3
(2)2 =4
(-3)2 =9
2 x -3= -6
2
39
35
39-36 = 3
35-29= 6
(3) =9
(6)2 =36
3 x 6= 18
42
35
42-36 = 6
35-29= 6
(6)2 =36
(6)2 =36
6 x 6= 36
55
46
55-36 = 19
46-29= 17 (19)2 =361
(17)2 =289 19 x 17= 323
x=360 y=290 x= 0
y= 0
x2=648
y2=598
xy=494
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
2.66747
P A Z A R E
b)
bxy =
y on x
y = bx
0.34518
x on y
x = by
= 0.9208
0.9595
nxy - (x)(y)
ny2 - y)2
9(56) - (0)(1)
bxy =
9(59) - (1)2
504 - 0
504
bxy =
=
531 - 1
530
bxy =
byx =
0.9333
bxy =
y on x
y = bx
0.9509
x on y
x = by
( y - y ) = byx ( x - x )
( y - 5.1111) = 0.9333 ( x - 5)
y - 5.1111 = 0.9333x - 4.665
y = 0.9333x - 4.665 + 5.1111
y = 0.9333x + 0.4461
( x - x ) = bxy ( y - y )
( x - 5) = 0.9509 ( y - 5.1111)
x - 5 = 0.9509y - 4.860
x = 0.9509y - 4.860 + 5
x = 0.9509y + 0.14
y = 0.9333x + 0.4461
x = 0.9509y + 0.14
c)
byx * bxy
0.9333 x 0.9509
= 0.8875
r
=
0.9421
( High Degree of Positive Correlation )
38
d)
byx * bxy
2.6675 x 0.3452
nxy - (x)(y)
nx2 - x)2
9(56) - (0)(1)
9(60) - (0)2
504 - 0
504
=
540 - 0
540
= 5.1111
P A Z A R E
byx =
b)
46
9
c)
y =
n
x = 0.3452y + 6.9306
byx =
y = 2.6675x - 17.4678
byx =
( x - x ) = bxy ( y - y )
( x - 11.375) = 0.3452 ( y - 12.875)
x - 11.375 = 0.3452y - 4.4445
x = 0.3452y - 4.4445 + 11.375
x = 0.3452y + 6.9306
Y =
N I L E S H
a)
( y - y ) = byx ( x - x )
( y - 12.875) = 2.6675 ( x - 11.375)
y - 12.875 = 2.6675x - 30.3428
y = 2.6675x - 30.3428 + 12.875
y = 2.6675x - 17.4678
45 = 5
9
P A
byx =
byx =
ndxdy - (dx)(dy)
ndy2 - dy)2
8(141) - (3)(7)
bxy = 8(407) - (7)2
1128 - 21
1107
bxy = 3256-49 = 3207
bxy =
P A
byx =
ndxdy - (dx)(dy)
ndx2 - dx)2
8(141) - (3)(7)
8(53) - (3)2
1128 - 21
1107
424 - 9 = 415
x =
n
N I L E S H
byx =
X =
= 12.875
103
8
y =
n
Ex (6):- Find the two regression equations from following data and estimate the yield for
10 inches rainfall and Determine the value of coefficient of correlation.
Raninfall (in inches) X:
1
2 3
4 5
6 7 8 9
Yield (tons) Y:
1
3 2
5 5
7 6 9 8
Ans:x
y
x=(x- x )
y=(y- 5)
x2
y2
xy
1
1
1-5 = -4
1-5= -4
(-4)2 = 16
(-4)2 = 16
-4 x -4= 16
2
3
2-5 = -3
3-5= -2
(-3)2 = 9
(-2)2 = 4
-3 x -2= 6
2
3
2
3-5 = -2
2-5= -3
(-2) = 4
(-3)2 = 9
-2 x -3= 6
4
5
4-5 = -1
5-5= 0
(-1)2 = 1
(0)2 = 0
-1 x 0= 0
5
5
5-5 = 0
5-5= 0
(0)2 = 0
(0)2 = 0
0 x 0= 0
6
7
6-5 = 1
7-5= 1
(1)2 = 4
(2)2 = 4
1 x 2= 2
7
6
7-5 = 2
6-5= 2
(2)2 = 1
(1)2 = 1
2 x 1= 2
8
9
8-5 = 3
9-5= 4
(3)2 = 9
(4)2 = 16
3 x 4= 12
9
8
9-5= 4
8-5= 3
(4)2 = 16
(3)2 = 9
4 x 3= 12
x=45 y=46
x= 0
y= 1
dx2=60
dy2=59
xy=56
Y =
dxdy
-3 x -8= 24
-2 x -6= 12
-1 x -4= 4
-1 x 0= 0
0 x 1= 0
2 x 3= 6
3 x 5= 15
5 x 16= 80
xy=141
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
91 = 11.375
8
dy2
(-8)2 = 64
(-6)2 = 36
(-4)2 = 16
(0)2 = 0
(1)2 = 1
(3)2 = 9
(5)2 = 25
(16)2 = 256
dy2=407
x =
n
dx2
(-3)2 = 9
(-2)2 = 4
(-1)2 = 1
(-1)2 = 1
(0)2 = 0
(2)2 = 4
(3)2 = 9
(5)2 = 25
dx2=53
dy=(y- 12)
4-12= -8
6-12= -6
8-12= -4
12-12= 0
13-12= 1
15-12= 3
17-12= 5
28-12= 16
y= 7
dx=(x- 11)
8-11 = -3
9-11 = -2
10-11 = -1
10-11 = -1
11-11 = 0
13-11 = 2
14-11 = 3
16-11 = 5
dx= 3
a)
y
4
6
8
12
13
15
17
28
y=103
X =
From following data, Calculate the two regression equations and Determine the
coefficient of correlation through regression coefficients.
8
9 10 10 11 13 14 16
4
6 8
12 13 15 17 28
Ex (5):value of
X:
Y:
Ans:x
8
9
10
10
11
13
14
16
x=91
38
39
( y - 90 ) = 0.8 12
3
( x - 10 ) = 0.8 3 ( y - 90 )
12
P A
P A Z A R E
R
39
Ex (9):- The following data based on 450 students, are given for marks in Statistics and
Economics at a certain examination:
Statistics (x)
Economics (y)
Mean Marks
40
48
Standard Deviation
12
16
Sum of the products of Deviation of marks from their respective means is 42075.
(a) give the equations to the two lines of regressions.
(b) Estimate the average marks in Economics of the candidate who obtained 50 marks in
statistics.
Ans:
42075
r
= dxdy
=
= 42075 = 0.48698
n x y
450 x 12 x 16
86400
Ex (8):- You are given below the information about advertising and sales of a company:
Advertising expenses (x)
Sales (y)
(Rs. in lakhs)
(Rs. in lakhs)
Mean
10
90
Variance
9
144
Correlation
0.8
(a) Calculate the two regression lines.
(b) Find the likely sales when advertising expenses are Rs. 15 and Rs. 20.
(c) What should be the advertising expenses when the company wants to attain a sales
target of Rs. 140 lakhs and Rs. 190 lakhs.
sisters age is 12
= 0.64y + 10.92
= 0.64 * 12 + 10.92
= 7.68 + 10.92
= 18.6 (Brothers age)
When
x
x
x
x
N I L E S H
P A
P A Z A R E
x - 25 = 0.8* 0.8 ( y - 22 )
x - 25 = 0.64 ( y - 22 )
x - 25 = 0.64y - 14.08
x = 0.64y - 14.08 + 25
x = 0.64y + 10.92
x = 0.64y + 10.92
x - 10 = 0.8* 0.25 ( y - 90 )
x - 10 = 0.2 ( y - 90 )
x - 10 = 0.2y - 18
x = 0.2y - 18 + 10
x = 0.2y - 8
x = 0.2y - 8
N I L E S H
y - 22 = 0.8 * 1.25 ( x - 25 )
y - 22 = 1 ( x - 25 )
y - 22 = 1x - 25
y = 1x - 25 + 22
y = x-3
y =x-3
y - 90 = 0.8 * 4 ( x - 10 )
y - 90 = 3.2 ( x - 10 )
y - 90 = 3.2x - 32
y = 3.2x - 32 + 90
y = 3.2x + 58
y = 3.2x + 58
( y - 22 )
( x - 10 )
( x - 25 ) = 0.8 4
5
( x - 25 )
( y - 22 ) = 0.8 5
4
x on y
x = by
( x - x ) = r x ( y - y )
y
( x - x ) = r x ( y - y )
y
144 = 12
( y - y ) = r y ( x - x )
x
( y - y ) = r y ( x - x )
x
y on x
y = bx
y = variance =
x on y
x = by
x = variance = 9 = 3
y on x
y = bx
Ex (7):- Karl Pearsons Coefficient of Correlation between the ages of brothers and sisters in a community was found to be 0.8.
Average of the brothers ages was 25 years and theat of sisters was 22 years. Their
standard deviations were 4 and 5 respectively. Find
(a) The expected age of brother when the sisters age is 12 years and
(b) The expected age of sister when the brothers age is 33 years.
Ans:Brothers (x)
Sisters (y)
Mean Age or Average Age
25
22
Standard Deviation
4
5
Coefficient of Correlation
0.8
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
40
y on x
y = bx
y ( x - x )
x
x ( y - y )
y
54.48
N I L E S H
P A Z A R E
1) Simple Semi-Average Method:- Divide the series into two equal halves (parts). If the
items are odd in number, the middle item is left out and kept isolated. If the items are even,
we well have two equal parts with no middle item. For example
Year
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
x
10
20
25
30
35
Part - I
15
>
32.5
Left out
Part - II
Year
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
x
10
20
25
30
35
45
18.34
>
Part - I
No Middle Item
36.67
Part - II
The Total of the values in each part is devided by the total number of the items of that
part. This gives us the mean value for each part. Each average is then cenred in the period
of time from which we have to plot the two points on the graph i.e. Two Average Values
are plotted. Then both these two points are joined by a straight line which gives the
simple semi-average trend.
10+20 30
10+20+25
55
x1 =
=
= 15
x1 =
=
= 18.34
2
2
3
3
30+35 65
30+35+45
110
x2 =
=
= 32.5
x2 =
=
= 36.67
2
2
3
3
E
40
P A Z A R E
b) Semi - Average Method:- Under this method there are three procedures to be
P A
Ex (10):- Find the Regression Equation y on x from the following information: x = 130,
y = 220, x2 = 2288, xy = 3459 and n = 10. ( x and y denote variables but not derivation).
Ans:y on x
N I L E S H
P A
32.45 + 22.03
0.649 * 50 - 22.03
x - 40 = 0.487 * 0.75 ( y - 48 )
x - 40 = 0.3653 ( y - 48 )
x - 40 = 0.3653y - 17.534
x = 0.3653y - 17.534 + 40
x = 0.3653y + 22.465
x = 0.3653y + 22.465
y - 48 = 0.487 * 1.333 ( x - 40 )
y - 48 = 0.649 ( x - 40 )
y - 48 = 0.649x - 25.97
y = 0.649x - 25.97 + 48
y = 0.649x - 22.03
y = 0.649x - 22.03
( x - 40) = 0.487 12 ( y - 48 )
16
( x - 40 )
( y - 48) = 0.487 16
12
(x- x )=r
The collected data is vast and comple. It is the composition of several forces, which
ma be pulling together the rend in different directions. The problem is solved by statisticians by decomposing the time series to understand the historical past and to give insight
in to the future. There are four methods commonly used in measuring the Trend Value.
a) Graphic (Freehand Curve Fitting) Method.
b) Method of Semi-Average.
c) Method of Moving Averages and
d) Least - Squares Method.
( x - x ) = bxy ( y - y )
(y- y )=r
x on y
x = by
( y - y ) = byx ( x - x )
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
41
>
>
N I L E S H
<
A
P A
Z
R E
40
x1
27.34
P A
Z A R E
10
9
Actual Line
<
Trend Line
<
Actual Line
15
Scale
x-axis - 1 cm = 1 year
y-axis - 1 cm = 5 unit
20
x2
7.5
10
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
y - axis
Years
1998
<
1997
<
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
x - axis
>
x - axis
Years
41
y - axis
>
<
<
1997
Scale
x-axis - 1 cm = 1 year
y-axis - 1 cm = 1 Rs.
<
Prices
25
x1
10
11
Trend Line
P A
x2
41.67
P A
The value 10 is plotted against the middle of the first 2 years. i.e. 1997 to 1998.
The value 7.5 is plotted aginst the middle of the last 2 years i.e. 2000 to 2001. The year
1999 and the price 5 are left out. Then both the points are joined by a straight line as under.
45
30
x2 = 7.5
50
35
x1 = 10
N I L E S H
9
(9+11) / 2 = 20 / 2 = 10
11
5 (left out)
8
7
(8+7) / 2 = 15/2 = 7.5
Graph showing sugar production (in 000 tonnes) with Trend line
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
The value 27.34 is plotted against the middle of the first 3 years. i.e. 1997 to 1999.
The value 41.67 is plotted aginst the middle of the last 3 years i.e. 2000 to 2002. Then both
the points are joined by a straight line as under.
Ex (2):- Using the method of simple semi-average determine the trend of the following
data.
Year:
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
Prices:
9
11
5
8
7
Ans:Year
Actual
2 yearly total
Semi-Average
value
average
Ex (1):- Using the method of simple semi-average determine the trend of the following
data.
Year:
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
Sugar Product:
40
38
4
45
37
43
Ans:Year
Actual
3 yearly total
Semi-Average
value
average
1997
40
1998
38
(40+38+4) / 3 =82 / 3 = 27.34
x1 = 27.34
1999
4
2000
45
2001
37
(45+37+43) / 3 =125/3 = 41.67
x2 = 41.67
2002
43
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
42
28
<
>
<
96
Actual Line
Scale
x-axis - 1 cm = 1 year
y-axis - 1 cm = 2 Unit
2013
2012
y - axis
2011
<
x - axis
2010
90
2009
>
92
2008
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
98
2007
Scale
x-axis - 1 cm = 1 year
y-axis - 1 cm = 1 Rs.
x1
22.5
1977
1976
1975
<
y - axis
>
x - axis
Years
Years
42
21
100
22
x1
104.67
94
23
104
2006
24
x2
26
Trend Line
25
<
>
<
x2
107.33
106
102
P A Z A R E
Trend Line
Prices
26
108
Actual Line
112
27
2.66
= 0.665
4
N I L E S H
<
>
0.875
= 0.4375
2
P A
107.33 - 104.67
4
102+108+112
322
=
= 107.33
3
3
110
3.5
= 0.875
4
P A Z A R E
A. I.
2
x2 =
26 - 22.5
=
4
25+26+27+26
104
=
= 26
4
4
P A
Annual Increament
x2 =
Annual Increament
N I L E S H
21+22+23+24 90
=
= 22.5
4
4
100+105+109 314
=
= 104.67
3
3
x2 =26
104
x1 =
Product
x2 =22.5
Trend Value
21.1875
22.0625
22.9375
23.8125
24.6875
25.5625
26.4375
27.3125
x=194
Adjustment
22.0625 - 0.875
22.50 - 0.4375
22.50 + 0.4375
22.9375 + 0.875
25.5625 - 0.875
26.00 - 0.4375
26.00 + 0.4375
26.4375 + 0.875
90
Semi Avg
Semi Total
x1 =
Actual Value
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
26
x=194
Year
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
The means will be placed against, the respective years with the adjustment by the
Annual Increament. Let us consider the example for finding the Trend values as under.
Ex (2):- Using the method of annual increament semi-average determine the trend of the
following data.
Year:
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Product:
100
105
109
96
102
108
112
Ans:Year
Actual Value
Semi Total Semi Avg
Adjustment
Trend Value
2006
100
104.67- 0.665
104.005
2007
105
314
x1=104.67 104.67
104.67
2008
109
104.67 + 0.665
105.335
2009
96
(left out)
105.335 + 0.665
106
2010
102
106 + 0.665
106.665
2011
108
322
x2=107.33 106.665 + 0.665
107.33
2012
112
107.33 + 0.665
107.995
2) Annual Increament Semi-Average Method:- Under this method, the data are divided
into the two equal halves. For each half, a simple srithmetic mean is obtained i.e. x1 and x2
The difference between the two means is divided by the number of items in each part
(i.e. items in one section). This ives us the Annual Increament.
x1 - x2
Annual Increament =
n
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
43
>
350
x1
268.75
x2
340.25
Trend Line
Scale
x-axis - 1 cm = 1 year
y-axis - 1 cm = 50 Unit
2013
2012
2011
y - axis
2010
<
>
x - axis
Years
QDM notes for MBA
150
200
<
250
(Note:- The Trend vales are computed and presented in graph by three ways
- Simple, Annual Increment and Annual Growth Methods - by semi average
method. All the ways are giveing the same results. So solve the problem any
one method from giving three methods of semi average. )
43
Actual Line
400
300
Note:- How to x find? ---> First data are divided into two part, if the number is even then
first take Half Year Increament (H.Y.I.) value and then add & substract the value of Annual
increament (A.I.). See the above table.
<
500
450
= 2 = 1
2
550
2009
Half Y.I. =
A. I.
2
P A Z A R E
2008
21.5 - 13.5 = 8 = 2
4
4
= 21.5
2007
Annual Increament
x2 = 19+23+21+23 = 86
4
4
2006
P A Z A R E
x1 = 12+13+13+16 = 54 = 13.5
4
4
N I L E S H
P A
+ 1=18.5
+ 3=20.5
+ 5=22.5
+ 7=24.5
yc =140
<
y2=86
17.5
17.5
17.5
17.5
P A
19
23
21
23
y=140
y
3060
y2 - y1
1361-1075
286
=
= 340 & Annual Growth Rate(a) =
=
=
= 14.3
n
9
n(n-n )
4(9-4)
20
N I L E S H
y=
yc = y - xa
17.5 - 7=10.5
17.5 - 5=12.5
17.5 - 3=14.5
17.5 - 1=16.5
x
a
xa
-5-2=-7
2
-7 x 2 = -14
-3-2=-5
2
-5 x 2 = -10
-1-2=-3
2
-3 x 2 = -6
-1
2
-1 x 2 = -2
0
(Centrend 17.5)
1
2
1 x2 = 2
1+2=3
2
3 x2 = 6
3+2=5
2
5 x 2 = 10
5+2=7
2
7 x 2 = 14
1989
1990
1991
1992
Year
1985
1986
1987
1988
Then y will be centred and below it the negative signs and above it the positive signs
for x are considered for deviations of serial number of years. Then the product of the
deviation dx and annual growth are adjusted to the y . Let us consider the example for
finding the trend values as under.
Product
=
=
n
n
Ex (2):- Using the method of annual growth rate semi-average determine the trend of the
following data.
Year:
2006
2007 2008
2009 2010 2011 2012
2013
2014
Product: 190
200
325
360
345
310
335
475
520
Ans:Year
Actual Value (y)
x
a
xa
yc = y - xa
2006
190
-3-1=-4
14.3
-4 x 14.3= -57.2
340-57.2=282.8
2007
200
-2-1=-3
14.3
-3 x 14.3= -42.9
340-42.9=297.1
y1=1075
2008
325
-1-1=-2
14.3
-2 x 14.3= -28.6
340-28.6=311.4
2009
360
0-1= -1
14.3
-1 x 14.3= -14.3
340-14.3=325.7
2010
345 (left out)
0
14.3
0 x 14.3= 0
340 - 0= 340
2011
310
0+1= 1
14.3
1 x 14.3= 14.3
340+14.3=354.3
2012
335
1+1=2
14.3
2 x 14.3= 28.6
340-28.6=368.6
y2=1361
2013
475
2+1=3
14.3
3 x 14.3= 42.9
340+42.9= 382.9
2014
520
3+1=4
14.3
4 x 14.3= 57.2
340+57.2=397.2
y=3060
yc =3060
3) Annual Growth Rate Semi-Average Method:- Under this method, the data are divided
into the two equal halves. For each half, a simple arithmetic mean is obtained i.e. x1 and x2
The average of the whole series is centred and annual growth rate is calculated with
the help of the following formula
y = y and
Annual growth Rate = y2 - y1
n
n (n - n )
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
2014
44
>
<
y - axis
1973
12
1965
59.250
62.335
<
57.83
60.67
64
>
x - axis
347
364
384
Trend Line
56
59
62.8
65.8
280
295
314
329
54
57
61.25
64.75
67.5
Scale
x-axis - 1 cm = 1 year
y-axis - 1 cm = 2 Unit
16
14
216
228
245
259
270
>
1972
6 y. Centered A.
18
1971
6 y. A.
20
1970
6 y. T.
22
1969
5 y. A.
Actual Line
24
1968
5 y. T
26
1967
4 y. A.
P A Z A< R E
Years
4 y.T. means addition of first 4 year value and 4 y. A. mean 4 y.T. / 4 , like that for 5 year and
6 year calculated. 6 y.Centered A. means addition of first two 6 y.A divided by 2.
44
4 y. T.
Values
52
50
55
59
64
67
69
70
28
Ex (2):Year
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
N I L E S H
P A
P A
P A Z A R E
(Note:- The two items in the opening and the two items in the ending are left out in the
5 yearly moving average. )
N I L E S H
(348+349)=697/2=348.5
(349+350)=699/2=349.5
(350+351)=701/2=350.5
(351+356)=707/2=353.5
(356+357)=713/2=356.5
(357+358)=715/2=357.5
(358+362)=720/2=360
(362+364)=726/2=363
(364+367)=731/2=365.5
(367+369)=736/2=368
(369+373)=742/2=371
(373+377)=750/2=375
1044/3=348
1047/3=349
1050/3=350
1053/3=351
1068/3=356
1071/3=357
1074/3=358
1086/3=362
1092/3=364
1101/3=367
1107/3=369
1119/3=373
1131/3=377
330+340+374=1044
340+374+333=1047
374+333+343=1050
333+343+377=1053
343+377+348=1068
377+348+346=1071
348+346+380=1074
346+380+360=1086
380+360+352=1092
360+352+389=1101
352+389+366=1107
389+366+364=1119
366+364+401=1131
3 yr centered avrg
1966
Consumption
Year
------1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
-------
Values
330
340
374
333
343
377
348
346
380
360
352
389
366
364
401
Year
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
Year
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
Ex (1):-
Ex (3):- Calculate the trend values by five yearly moving average method and plot the same
on a graph from the following:
Year:
1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972
1973
Consumption: 12
14
18
24
22
20
16
25
26
Under this method, the trend values can be obtained by employing arithmetic means
of the series except at the two ends of the series. We can have the moving averges for 3,
4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9 years depending upoin the size of the items. The procedure of veraging the
3 itmes or 4 items or different items simplifies the analysis and removes variations in the
values for a period concerned. The moving averages may form a straight line trend or a
curve. The process of averaging works as under.
We should decide first the period of the moving average. If it is 3 years or months or
weeks or days, the problem of centering the averages will not arise at all. But if we take 6
years or months or weeks or days, the averages are placed first in between th two middle
items and the arithmetic mean will be applied to center the items.
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
1974
N I L E S < H
>
N I L E S H
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
+0.8571
+0.2857
-0.5714
-0.8571
+0.2857
+0.8571
+0.2857
-0.5714
-0.8571
+6
+2
-4
-6
+2
+6
+2
-4
-6
56
Actual Line
54
52
P A
P A Z A
R
E
50
48
42
38
34
45
1978
1977
1976
1975
1974
1973
1972
1971
1970
1969
y - axis
1968
<
<
1967
30
Scale
x-axis - 1 cm = 1 year
y-axis - 1 cm = 2 Unit
>
x - axis
Years
32
Trend Line
36
40
>
44
Prices
46
P A
Ex (5):- Calculate the trend values by the method of moving averages assuming a four
yearly cycle from the following data relating to sugar production in India.
Year:
1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988
Product: 75
62
76
78
94
84
96 128 116 76
102 168
Ans:Year
Values 4 year moving total
4 year Moving Average
Centred
Year
1977
75
1978
62
75+62+76+78=291
291/4=072.75
1979
76
75.225
1979
62+76+78+94=310
310/4=077.70
1980
78
80.350
1980
76+78+94+84=332
332/4=083.00
1981
94
85.500
1981
78+94+84+96=352
352/4=088.00
1982
84
94.250
1982
94+84+96+128=402
402/4=100.50
1983
96
103.25
1983
84+96+128+116=424
424/4=106.00
1984
128
105.00
1984
96+128+116+76=416
416/4=104.00
1985
116
104.75
1985
128+116+76+102=422
422/4=105.50
1986
76
110.50
1986
116+76+102+168=462
462/4=115.50
1987
102
1988
168
P A Z A R E
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Year
+2.000
-0.667
-2.000
-0.667
+1.333
+2.000
-0.667
-2.000
-0.667
+1.333
+2.000
-0.667
-2.000
7 y. A.
6
-2
-6
-2
4
6
-2
-6
-2
4
6
-2
-6
7 y. T.
5 y. T
3 y. A.
3 y. T.
Ex (6):- Calculate the trend values from the following data using 6 yearly moving averages
and plot the actual and trend values on a graph.
Year:
1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978
Prices:
30
45
35
41
42
47
48
46
40
50
55
52
Ans:Year Values
6 year moving total
6 yr Mv Average Centred
Year
1967
30
--------1968
45
--------1969
35
---30+45+35+41+42+47=240
240/6=40
1970
41
40+43=83/2=41.5 1970
45+35+41+42+47+48=258
258/6=43
1971
42
86.17/2=43.085 1971
35+41+42+47+48+46=259
259/6=43.17
1972
47
87.17/2=43.585 1972
41+42+47+48+46+40=264
262/6=44
1973
48
89.5/2=44.75
1973
42+47+48+46+40+50=273
273/6=45.5
1974
46
93.17/2=46.585 1974
47+48+46+40+50+55=286
286/6=47.67
1975
40
96.17/2=48.085 1975
48+46+40+50+55+52=291
291/6=48.5
1976
50
---1977
55
--------1978
52
---------
Prices
4
2
0
-4
-2
4
2
0
-4
-2
4
2
0
-4
-2
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
Ex (4):Year:
Prices:
Ans:Year
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
45
46
P A Z A R E
Yc = a + bx
Yc= 19.5+ 0.8096 (-7) = 19.5 + ( -5.6672) = 19.5 - 5.6672 = 13.8328
Yc= 19.5+ 0.8096 (-5) = 19.5 + ( -4.048) = 19.5 - 4.048 = 15.4520
Yc= 19.5+ 0.8096 (-3) = 19.5 + ( -2.4288) = 19.5 - 2.4288 = 17.0712
Yc= 19.5+ 0.8096 (-1) = 19.5 + ( -0.8096) = 19.5 - 0.8096 = 18.6904
Yc= 19.5+ 0.8096 (1) = 19.5 + 0.8096 = 20.3096
Yc= 19.5+ 0.8096 (3) = 19.5 + 2.4288 = 21.9288
Yc= 19.5+ 0.8096 (5) = 19.5 + 4.048 = 23.5480
Yc= 19.5+ 0.8096 (7) = 19.5 + 5.6672 = 25.1672
N I L E S H
P A Z A R E
Ex (2):- Let us obtain the straight line trend increasing one more observation in the series
making the whole observation odd number of items.
Ans:Year Values(y)
x
x2
xy
Trend values (Yc= a + bx)
1990
16
-4
(-4)2= 16
16 x -4= -64
Yc= 19.5+ 1.3 (-4)= 14.3
1991
14
-3
(-3)2= 9
14 x -3= -42
Yc= 19.5+ 1.3 (-3)= 15.6
1992
20
-2
(-2)2= 4
20 x -2= -40
Yc= 19.5+ 1.3 (-2)= 16.9
1993
18
-1
(-1)2= 1
18 x -1= -18
Yc= 19.5+ 1.3 (-1)= 18.2
1994
19.5
0
(0)2= 0
19.5 x 0= 0
Yc= 19.5+ 1.3 (0)= 19.5
1995
12
+1
(1)2= 1
12 x 1= 12
Yc= 19.5+ 1.3 (1)= 20.8
1996
23
+2
(2)2= 4
23 x 2= 46
Yc= 19.5+ 1.3 (2)= 22.1
1997
28
+3
(3)2= 9
28 x 3= 84
Yc= 19.5+ 1.3 (3)= 23.4
1998
25
+4
(4)2= 16
25 x 4= 100
Yc= 19.5+ 1.3 (4)= 24.7
y=175.5 x=0
x2 =60
xy= 78
Yc= 175.5
a
y
n
= 175.5 = 19.5
9
46
= 0.8096
xy =
x2
78
60
= 1.3
dx
-7
-5
-3
-1
+1
+3
+5
+7
136
168
dx= (x - X )
-3.5
-2.5
-1.5
-0.5
or
+0.5
+1.5
+2.5
+3.5
dx = (x - X )
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
xy =
x2
x
-7
-5
-3
-1
+1
+3
+5
+7
In the time series, the variable x can be measured from any point of origin period as
first year or starting point. It is always better to select the point of origin in the middle of the
x series (i.e. x = 0). this brings balance between the negative and positive values. The
period indicating the higher values can be reduced to the minimum sysmbolically as
under.
P A
The sum of deviations of the Y (actual values) from the Yc (cmputed values) is equal
to zero.
Y = actual values
Yc = Trend values
(Y - Yc ) = 0
P A
(i)
156 = 19.5
8
N I L E S H
y
n
y = Sum of y values
x = Sum of x values
n = Number of Observation
x2 = Sum of the squares of x
xy = Sum of the products of x and y.
x = Independent variable
y = Dependent variable on x
a = The y intercept or catch constant
b = Indicate slope & signifies the
changes in x constant
Y on X ---------Y = a + bX
To obtain the values of a and b constants, we have the following two secondary
equations.
y = na + b x
xy = a x + b x2
A linear trend values are obtained by the y on x equation which form a series in
arithmetic progression, the constant difference being the value of b representing the
slope. Following are the notations.
Ex (1):- Let us obtain the straight line trend for the values given below:
Ans:Year Values(y)
x
x2
xy
Trend values (Yc= a + bx)
1990
16
-7
(-7)2=49
16 x -7= -112 Yc= 19.5+ 0.8096 (-7)= 13.8328
1991
14
-5
(-5)2=25
14 x -5= -70
Yc= 19.5+ 0.8096 (-5)= 15.4520
1992
20
-3
(-3)2=9
20 x -3= -60
Yc= 19.5+ 0.8096 (-3)= 17.0712
1993
18
-1
(-1)2=1
18 x -1= -18
Yc= 19.5+ 0.8096 (-1)= 18.6904
1994
12
+1
(1)2=1
12 x 1= 12
Yc= 19.5+ 0.8096 (1)= 20.3096
1995
23
+3
(3)2=9
23 x 3= 69
Yc= 19.5+ 0.8096 (3)= 21.9288
1996
28
+5
(5)2=25
28 x 5= 140
Yc= 19.5+ 0.8096 (5)= 23.5480
1997
25
+7
(7)2=49
25 x 7= 175
Yc= 19.5+ 0.8096 (7)= 25.1672
y=156 x=0
x2 =168
xy=136
Yc= 156
This is the most accurate method of finding the trend values with the help of a mathematical technique, which gives us a straight line trend. A line of the Best Fit can be
obtained by the regression equation Y and X. It is a line from which the actual values
deviated on either sides. The sum of the deviations taken from the arithmetic mean will be
zero. Consequently, the sum of squares of devitations will be leas, as compared to the
other alternatives. That is why this method is called the Method of Least Squares.
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
47
= 70.5
N I L E S H
P A Z A R E
= xy2 =
x
8
20
= 0.4
47
Year
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
x
+7
+9
+11
+13
+15
Yc=
Yc=
Yc=
Yc=
Yc=
Yc= a + bx
65.75+ 3.6667 (7) = 65.75+ 25.6669 = 91.4169
65.75+ 3.6667 (9) = 65.75+ 33.0003 = 98.7503
65.75+ 3.6667 (11) = 65.75+ 40.3337 = 106.0837
65.75+ 3.6667 (13) = 65.75+ 47.6671 = 113.4171
65.75+ 3.6667 (15) = 65.75+ 55.0005 = 120.755
P A Z A R E
Predicted earning for the year 1990 = 106.0837 lakhs and year 1992 = 120.755 lakhs.
Ex (6):- Apply the method of least squares and determine the sales for the year 1975, 1977
and 1978.
Year:
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
Sales:
100
110
130
125
170
168
191
Ans:Year Values(y)
x
x2
xy
Trend values (Yc= a + bx)
1968
100
-3
(-3)2= 9
100 x -3= -300
Yc= 142+ 15.3214 (-3)= 96.0358
1969
110
-2
(-2)2= 4
110 x -2= -220
Yc= 142+ 15.3214 (-2)= 111.3572
1970
130
-1
(-1)2= 1
130 x -1= -130
Yc= 142+ 15.3214 (-1)= 126.6786
1971
125
0
(0)2= 0
125 x 0= 0
Yc= 142+ 15.3214 (0)= 142
1972
170
+1 (1)2= 1
170 x 1= 170
Yc= 142+ 15.3214 (1)= 157.3214
1973
168
+2 (2)2= 4
168 x 2= 336
Yc= 142+ 15.3214 (2)= 172.6428
1974
191
+3 (3)2= 9
191 x 3= 573
Yc= 142+ 15.3214 (3)= 187.9642
y=994 x=0 x2 =28
xy=429
Yc= 994
QDM notes for MBA
= 12.5
= 3.667
50
4
616
168
= xy =
x2
= y
n
N I L E S H
Ex (4):- Let us obtain the straight line trend increasing one more observation in the series
making the whole observation odd number of items.
Ans:Year Values(y)
x
x2
xy
Trend values (Yc= a + bx)
1982
10
-3
(-3)2= 9
10 x -3= -30
Yc= 12.5+ 0.4 (-3)= 11.3
1983
13
-1
(-1)2= 1
13 x -1= -13
Yc= 12.5+ 0.4 (-1)= 12.1
1984
15
+1
(1)2= 1
15 x 1= 15
Yc= 12.5+ 0.4 (1)= 12.9
1985
12
+3
(3)2= 9
12 x 3= 36
Yc= 12.5+ 0.4 (3)= 13.7
y=50
x=0
x2 =20
xy=8
Yc= 50
a
= 526 = 65.75
8
P A
P A
Yc = a + bx
Yc= 680+ 70.5
Yc= 680+ 70.5
Yc= 680+ 70.5
Yc= 680+ 70.5
Yc= 680+ 70.5
Yc= 680+ 70.5
Yc= 680+ 70.5
Yc= 680+ 70.5
Yc= 680+ 70.5
= y
n
4230
60
x
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
= xy2 =
x
= 6120 = 680
9
= y
n
Ex (5):- Fit a straight line tren d by the least squares method to the following data. Assuming that same rate of change continues, state what would be the predicted earning for the
year 1990 and 1992.
Year:
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
Earning: 38
40
65
72
69
60
87
95
Ans:Year Values(y)
x
x2
xy
Trend values (Yc= a + bx)
1981
38
-7
(-7)2=49
38 x -7= -266
Yc= 65.75+ 3.6667 (-7)= 40.0831
1982
40
-5
(-5)2=25
40 x -5= -200
Yc= 65.75+ 3.6667 (-5)= 47.4165
1983
65
-3
(-3)2=9
65 x -3= -195
Yc= 65.75+ 3.6667 (-3)= 54.7499
1984
72
-1
(-1)2=1
72 x -1= -72
Yc= 65.75+ 3.6667 (-1)= 62.0833
1985
69
+1
(1)2=1
69 x 1= 69
Yc= 65.75+ 3.6667 (1)= 69.4167
1986
60
+3
(3)2=9
60 x 3= 180
Yc= 65.75+ 3.6667 (3)= 76.7501
1987
87
+5
(5)2=25
87 x 5= 435
Yc= 65.75+ 3.6667 (5)= 84.0835
1988
95
+7
(7)2=49
95 x 7= 665
Yc= 65.75+ 3.6667 (7)= 91.4169
y=526 x=0 x2 =168
xy=616
Yc= 526
Ex (3):- Obtain the straight line trend equation and tabulate against each year the trend
values:
Ans:Year Values(y)
x
x2
xy
Trend values (Yc= a + bx)
1972
380
-4
(-4)2= 16
380 x -4= -1520 Yc= 680+ 70.5 (-4)= 398
1973
400
-3
(-3)2= 9
400 x -3= -1200 Yc= 680+ 70.5 (-3)= 468.5
1974
650
-2
(-2)2= 4
650 x -2= -1350 Yc= 680+ 70.5 (-2)= 539
1975
720
-1
(-1)2= 1
720 x -1= -720
Yc= 680+ 70.5 (-1)= 609.5
1976
690
0
(0)2= 0
690 x 0= 0
Yc= 680+ 70.5 (0)= 680
1977
620
+1
(1)2= 1
620 x 1= 620
Yc= 680+ 70.5 (1)= 750.5
1978
670
+2
(2)2= 4
670 x 2= 1340
Yc= 680+ 70.5 (2)= 821
1979
950
+3
(3)2= 9
950 x 3= 2850
Yc= 680+ 70.5 (3)= 891.5
1980
1040
+4
(4)2= 16
1040 x 4= 4160 Yc= 680+ 70.5 (4)= 962
y=6120 x=0
x2 =60
xy=4230
Yc= 6120
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
48
= 994 = 142
7
1)
For this problem, the decision variables are x1 and x2, the number of units of the products
A and B respectively. The objective function and the constraints are reproduced as :
Z = 40x1 + 35x2
profit
Subject to
2x1 + 3x2 60
4x1 + 3x2 96
x1 , x2 0
Sales for the year 1985 = 7 tons and year 1986 = 7.75 tons and year 1988 = 8.5 tons
48
Maximise
Yc= a + bx
Yc= 13 + 0.75 (-8) = 13 - 6 = 7
Yc= 13 + 0.75 (-7) = 13 - 5.25 = 7.75
Yc= 13 + 0.75 (-6) = 13 - 4.5 = 8.5
Yc= 13 + 0.75 (-5) = 13 - 3.75 = 9.25
Yc= 13 + 0.75 (-4) = 13 - 3 = 10
Yc= 13 + 0.75 (-3) = 13 - 2.25 = 10.75
We shall demostrate the graphical approach first in respect of the maximisations and
then for the minimisation problems.
= 0.75
x
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
21
28
Year
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
= xy2 =
x
P A Z A R E
Yc= a + bx = 13 + 0.75x
The use the graphic method for solving linear programming problems, the following
steps are required:(a) Identify the problem-the decision variables, the objective functions,and the constraint
restrictions.
(b) Draw a graph that includes all the constrainsts/ restrictions and identify the feasible
region.
(c) Obtain the point on the feasible region that optimises the objective function-the optimal solution.
(d) Interpret the results.
P A
= 13
= 91
7
= y
n
N I L E S H
P A
P A Z A R E
N I L E S H
Ex (7):- Apply the method of least squares and determine the sales for the year 1985, 1986
and 1988.
Year:
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
Production:
12
10
14
11
13
15
16
Ans:Year Values(y)
x
x2
xy
Trend values (Yc= a + bx)
1968
12
-3
(-3)2= 9
12 x -3= -36
Yc= 13 + 0.75 (-3) = 10.75
1969
10
-2
(-2)2= 4
10 x -2= -20
Yc= 13 + 0.75 (-2) = 11.50
1970
14
-1
(-1)2= 1
14 x -1= -14
Yc= 13 + 0.75 (-1) = 12.25
1971
11
0
(0)2= 0
11 x 0= 0
Yc= 13 + 0.75 (0) = 13
1972
13
+1 (1)2= 1
13 x 1= 13
Yc= 13 + 0.75 (1) = 13.75
1973
15
+2 (2)2= 4
15 x 2= 30
Yc= 13 + 0.75 (2) = 14.50
1974
16
+3 (3)2= 9
16 x 3= 48
Yc= 13 + 0.75 (3) = 15.25
y=91
x=0 x2 =28
xy=21
Yc= 91
Sales for the year 1975 = 203.2856 units and year 1977 = 233.9284 units and
for year 1978 = 249.2498 units.
(a) There should be an objective which should be clearly identifiable and measurable in
quantitative terms. It could be, for example, maximisation of sales, of profit, minimisation
of cost, and so on.
(b) The acitivites to be included should be distinctly identifiable and measureable in
quantitative terms, for instance, the products encluded in a production planning problem.
(c) The resources of the system, which are to be allocated for the attainment of the goal,
should also be identifiable and measureable quantitatively. They must be in limited supply. The technique would involve allocation of these resources in a manner that would
made off the returns on the investment of the resources for the attainment of the objective.
(d) The relationships representing the objective as also the resource limitation considerations, represented by the objective function and the constraint equations or inequalities, respectively, must be linear in nature.
(e) There should be a series of feasible alternative courses of action availbale to the
decision maker which are determined by the resource constraints.
Yc= a + bx
+ 15.3214 (3) = 142 + 45.9642 = 187.9642
+ 15.3214 (4) = 142 + 61.2856 = 203.2856
+ 15.3214 (5) = 142 + 76.607 = 218.607
+ 15.3214 (6) = 142 + 91.9284 = 233.9284
+ 15.3214 (7) = 142 + 107.2498 = 249.2498
142
142
142
142
142
The linear programming method is a technique for choosing the best alternative from
a set of feasible alternationves, in situations in which the objective function as wll as the
contraints can be expressed as linear mathematical functions. In order to apply linear
programming, certain requirements have to be met. These are discussed here.
Yc=
Yc=
Yc=
Yc=
Yc=
x
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7
= 15.3214
Year
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
429
28
= xy =
x2
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
49
Objective variable
Subject to contraint-->
2x1 + 3x2 60
4x1 + 3x2 96
x1 , x2 0
2x1 + 3x2 = 60
( 0 , 20 )
( 30 , 0 )
x2 = 96 / 3 = 32
x1 = 96 / 2 = 24
( 0 , 32 )
( 24 , 0 )
( 0 , 20 ) ( 30 , 0 )
Since, x1=0
Since, x2=0
( 0 , 32 ) ( 24 , 0 )
>
96
N< I L E S H
26
<
2x
P A Z A R E
1
3x
18
60
<
16
12
Q
2)
Now we shall consider the graphical solution to the linear programming problems of the
minimisation nature.
Minimise
Z = 40x1 + 24x2
Total Cost
Subject to
Phosphate Requirment
Nitrogen Requirment
P A Z A R E
Ans:-
Feasible Region
Subject to contraint-->
> x1
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10
<
Since, x1=0
Since, x2=0
49
x1 , x2 0
<
<
2
x - axis <
O
y - axis
Objective variable
<
Since, Z is higesht at point Q, the optimal solution is to produce 18 units of product A and
8 units of product B every week, to get the profit of Rs. 1000. No other product mix under the
given condition could yield more profit than this.
Thus, maximum profit of Rs.1000 can be achieved when x1 = 18 and x2 = 8 at point Q.
10
(Maximum)
14
Z = 40x1 + 35x2
Z= 0+0=0
Z= 0 + 35 x 20 = 700
Z= 40x18 + 35x8 = 720 + 280 = 1000
Z= 40 x 24 + 0 = 960
P A
22
P
20
x2
0
20
8
0
N I L E S H
P A
24
x1
0
0
18
24
=
3x 2
28
Points
O
P
Q
R
+
4x 1
30
Scale
x-axis - 1 cm = 2 Unit
y-axis - 1 cm = 2 Unit
32
x2
From the graph we find the various points i.e. OPQR and its values.
The Z-values corresponding to the various points in respect of the given problem are
shown here.
4x1 + 3x2 = 96
0 + 3x2 = 96,
4x1+ 0 = 96,
x2 = 60 / 3 = 20
x1 = 60 / 2 = 30
4x1 + 3x2 = 96
4x1 + 3x2 = 96
0 + 3x2 = 60,
2x1+ 0 = 60,
Since, x1=0
Since, x2=0
2x1 + 3x2 = 60
2x1 + 3x2 = 60
From the graph, the line that would yield the maximum profit that passes through the Point
Q. This point give the maximum contribution and thus represents the optimal solution i.e.
18 units of Product A and 8 units of product B. This production of 18 units of A and 8 units
of B will consume
2 x 18 + 3 x 8 = 36 + 24 = 60 kg of raw material and
4 x 18 + 3 x 8 = 72 + 24 = 96 labour hours.
Hence, both the resources shall be fully utilised by this production plan.
In our example, the feasible region is given by the polygon OPQR, so we shall obtain the
ordinates of each of these points (giving the values x1 and x2 ) and caluculate the objective
function value by subsituting them into the objective function. The values of x1 and x2 at
each point can be ready directly from the graph. Also, in respect of those points which lie
on the intersection of tow lines, we can get the values by solving simultaneously the
equation representing those lines.
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
( 0 , 96 )
(240 , 0 )
( 0 , 96 ) ( 240 , 0 )
50
Since, x1=0
Since, x2=0
( 90 , 0 )
>
>
96
Feasible Region
84
20
=4
80
Phosp hate
Requirement
Nitrogen Requirement
260
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
x1
N I L E S H
60x1 + 0
= 2400
x1 = 2400 / 60 = 40
P A Z A R E
Some Special Cases:In each of the two examples discussed so far, we have obtained a unique optimal
soution. We now consider three types of linear programming problems which do not have
unique optimal solutions. These are problems having multiple optimal solutions, having
no feasible solution, and having unbounded solutions.
1. Multiple Optimal Solutions: As stated above, in each of the three examples that we
have considered, we have observed that the optimal solution is given by an extreme point
of the feasible region and the solution is unique. The uniquesness implies that no other
solution to the given problem shall yield the same value of the objective function as given
by that solution. It is, of course, possible that in a given problem there may be more than
one optimal solution. Each of the multiple optima would naturally yield the same objective
funciton value.
The solution (if it exists) to a linear programming problem shall always be unique if
the slope of the objective function (represented by the iso-profit lines) is different from the
R
50
Joining the two points (0,96) & (240,0) , we get the striaght line corresponding to the above
equation. The area beyond this line represents the feasible area in respect of theis contraint
any point on the straight line or in the region above this line would satisfy the contraint.
Similarly, the second contraint can be depicated by plotting the straight line corresponding
to the equation 80x1 + 50x2 =7200. The points falling on this line and in the area beyond it
indicate the feasible values of x1 & x2 in respect of this contraint.
Since both the requirements are to be met, the feasible region in respect of the problem is
as represented by the shaded area. The feasible region here represents a convex set.
The region is unbounded on the upper side because one of the restrications in the
problem places an upper limit on the value of either of the decision variables. Obviously, if
such limits are placed, the feasible region would be a bounded one.
OR
How to find the correct points of interset point of feasible reasiong.
20x1 + 50x2 = 4800
---- eqn (1)
&
80x1 + 50x2 = 7200
20
<
>
y - axis
240
>R
x - axis <
Since, the total cost is minimum at point P, the optimal solution to the problem is to buy 144
bags of mixture of B only and none of mixture of A. This would entail a total cost of Rs 3456
Thus, miximum cost of Rs.3456 can be achieved when x1 = 0 and x2 = 144 at point P.
P A
>
P A> Z A
R E
P A
2 00
12
+5
0x
=7
36
24
0x 2
48
Minimum
N I L E S H
+5
60
72
Z = 40x1 + 24x2
Z= 0 + 24 x 144 = 3456 <
Z= 40x40 + 24x80 = 1600 + 1920 = 3520
Z= 40 x 240 + 0 = 9600
>
x2
144
80
0
108
Scale
x-axis - 1 cm = 20 Unit
y-axis - 1 cm = 12 Unit
120
8 0x 1
132
144
x1
0
40
240
156
Points
P
Q
R
x2
Alternately, the optimal soulution to the problem may be seen to be located at an extreme
point at point P, Q, R. in our example. We can evaluate the ordinates at each of these points
as follows:
( 0 , 144 )
( 0 , 144 )
( 90 , 0 )
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
51
Objective variable
x1 , x2
N I L E S H
x1 + x2 = 200
( 0 , 200 )
x2 = 125
( 200 , 0 )
x2 = 125,
( 0 , 125)
Since, x1=0
Since, x2=0
0 + 6x2 = 900,
3x1+ 0 = 900,
x2 = 900/6 = 150
x1 = 900/3 = 300
( 0 , 150 )
(300, 0 )
P A Z A R E
x2
( 0 , 150 )
( 300 , 0 )
>
C
+
6x
Subject to contraint-->
> x1
400
350
300
250
200
150
50
100
<
x - axis <
O
y - axis
90
Scale
x-axis - 1 cm = 50 Unit
y-axis - 1 cm = 25 Unit
2x1 + x2 40 ,
4x1 - x2 20 , x1 30 ,
x1 , x2 0
2x1 + x2 = 40
2x1 + x2 = 40
2x1 + x2 = 40
51
Since, x1=0
Since, x2=0
0 + x2 = 40,
2x1+ 0 = 40,
x2 = 40
x1 = 40 / 2 = 20
( 0 , 40 )
(20, 0 )
( 0 , 40 ) ( 20 , 0 )
Second Edition 2013 - 2014
25
Objective variable
Ans:-
x1 , x2 0
Feasible
Region
50
3x
75
x2=125
200
125
A
100
P A Z A R E
2. Infeasibilty: It has already been stated that a solution is called feasible if it satisfies all
the constraints and the non-negativity conditions. Sometimes it is possible that the constraints may be inconsistent so that there is no feasible solution to the problem. Such a
situtaion is called infeasibility.
In the graphic approach to the solution to an LPP, the infeaisbility is evident if its
feasible region is empty so that there is no feasible region in which all the constraints may
be satisfied simultanieously.
x 2=
150
N I L E S H
x 1+
175
P A
x2 = 200
x1 = 200
0 + x2 = 200,
x1+ 0 = 200,
P A
Since, x1=0
Since, x2=0
(Maximum)
(Maximum)
x1 + x2 = 200
x1 + x2 = 200
Z = 8x1 + 16x2
Z= 0+0=0
Z= 0 + 16 x 125 = 2000
Z= 8x50 + 16x125 = 400+2000 = 2400
Z= 8x100+16X100 = 800+1600 = 2400
Z = 8 X 200 + 0 = 1600
x1 + x2 200 ,
Subject to contraint-->
x2
0
125
125
100
0
x2 125 ,
Ans:-
x1 + x2 200 ,
x1
0
0
50
100
200
Subject to
Points
O
A
B
C
D
We observe that iso-profit lines are parallel to the equation for third constraint 3x1 + 6x2 =
900. As we move the iso-profit line farther from the origin, it coincides with the portion BC
of the constraint line that forms the boundary of the feasible region. It implies that there are
an infiinite number of optimal solutions represented by all points lying on the line segment
BC, including the extreme points represented by B(50,125) and C(100,100). Since the
extreme points are also included in the solutions, we may disregard all other solutions
and consider only these, to establish that the solution to a linear programming problem
shall always lie at an extreme point of the feasible region.
The extreme points of the feasible region are given and evaluated here.
slope of the constraints. In case the objective function has slope which is same as that of
a constraint, then multiple optimal solutions might exist. There are two conditions that
should be satisfied in order that multipleoptimal solutions exist.
(a) The objective function should be parallel to a constraint that forms an edge or boundary on the feasible region and
(b) The constraint should form a boundary on the feasible region in the direction of
optimal movement of the objective functions. In other words, the constraint must be a
binding constraint.
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
Ans:-
x - axis
<
y - axis
30
25
20
15
10
-20
2x1 + 4x2 16
x1 + 5x2 15
x1 , x2 0
52
2x
P A Z A R E
1
+4
x=
2
x - axis <
O
y - axis
x+
1
16
5x
=1
> x1
Scale
x-axis - 1 cm = 2 Unit
y-axis - 1 cm = 1 Unit
From the graph, we find the points of B i.e. ( 2.33, 2.57 ), which are not bounded to the
feasible region. Clearly, here the objective function is not bound over the feasible region
and we can move the iso-profit line upward witout any limit. The problem has, therefor,
unbounded solution.
For a minimisation LPP, unboundedness occurs when htere are points in the feasible region with arbitrarily small values. To conclude, a maximisation LPP is unbounded
if, moving parallel to the original iso-profit line in the direction of increasing Z, we never
entirely leave the feasible region and, on the other hand, a minimisation problem is
unbounded if we never leave the feasible region while moving in the direction of decreasing Z.
Subject to
Feasible
Region
Z = 10x1 + 20x2
Maximise
3. Unboundedness: For a maximisation type of linear programming problem unboundedness occurs when there is no constraint on the solution so that one or more of the
decision variables can be increased indefinitely without violating any of the restrications
(constraints). Thus, an unbouned LPP occurs if it is possible to find points in the feasible
region with arbitrarily large Z-values (may be profit or revenue). this sugests that practically
if we find the solution to be unbounded of a profit-maximising linear programming problem, it may be concluded that the problem has not been correctly formulated.
P A
P A
It is represented graphically in above figure. The feasible region corresponding to the first
two constrants is bound by the convex set OABC, while the feasible region in respect of the
third constraint is also shown shaded separately. We can easily observe that there is no
common point in the areas shaded.
Therefore, all the constraints cannot be satisfied and as such, there is no feasible solution to the given problem.
Ex :-
N I L E S H
6
5
Feasible
Region
P A Z A R E
( 15 , 0 )
16
>
> x1
N I L E S H
O
-10
(0,3)
( 15, 0 )
x2
0 + 5x2 = 15,
x1+ 0 = 15,
(0,3)
x2 = 15 / 5 = 3
x1 = 15
(8,0)
<
=4
x1 + 5x2 = 15
-x
1
4x
>
Since, x1=0
Since, x2=0
(0,4)
(8,0)
10
x1=30
2x
(0,4)
x2 = 16 / 4 = 4
x1 = 16 / 2 = 4
20
30
Scale
x-axis - 1 cm = 5 Unit
y-axis - 1 cm = 10 Unit
x1 + 5x2 = 15
x1 + 5x2 = 15
0 + 4x2 = 16,
2x1+ 0 = 16,
>
=2
>
A
40
Since, x1=0
Since, x2=0
2x1+ 4x2 = 16
x2
2x1+ 4x2 = 16
2x1+ 4x2 = 16
14
( 30 , 0 )
x1 , x2
12
x1 = 30
(5,0)
x1 + 5x2 15 ,
( 0 , -20 )
( 0 , -20 )
(5, 0 )
4x1 - x2 = 20
x2 = - 20
x1 = 20 / 4 = 5
10
0 - x2 = 20,
4x1 - 0 = 20,
Since, x1=0
Since, x2=0
Subject to contraint-->
4x1 - x2 = 20
4x1 - x2 = 20
Objective variable
4x1 - x2 20 , x1 30 ,
2x1 + x2 40 ,
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
<
Subject to contraint-->
52
Z = 6x1 + 14x2
Subject to
3x1 + 7x2 84 ,
x1 + 2x2 18,
x1 , x2 0
( 0 , 15 ) ( 12 , 0 )
( 0 , 12 )
( 28, 0 )
x2 = 18 / 2 = 9
x1 = 18
(0,9)
( 18, 0 )
Since, x1=0
Since, x2=0
0 + 2x2 = 18,
x1+ 0 = 18,
(0,9)
( 18 , 0 )
x 2=
60
12
2x
3x
18
7x
2
84
Subject to
> x1
30
24
18
12
<
x - axis <
O
y - axis
Note:- if you are unable to find correct points from graph then cross check the answer by
solving those equation which two line intersect each other.
53
Maximise
Z = 10x1 + 15x2
2x1 + x2 26
2x1 + 4x2 56
x1 - x2 -5
x1 , x2 0
Second Edition 2013 - 2014
Feasible
Region
Scale
x-axis - 2 cm = 6 Unit
y-axis - 2 cm = 3 Unit
P A Z A R E
0 + 23x2 = 240
x2 = 240 / 23 = 10.43
0 + 6x2 = 30
x2 = 30 / 6 = 5
P A
+4
P A
5x 1
P A Z A R E
N I L E S H
>
x1 + 2x2 = 18
15
( 0 , 12 ) ( 28 , 0 )
N I L E S H
x2
OR
How to find the correct points of interset point of feasible reasiong.
5x1 + 4x2 = 60---- eqn (1), 3x1 + 7x2 = 84---- eqn (2), &
x1 + 2x2 = 18---- eqn (3)
x2 = 84 / 7 = 12
x1 = 84 / 3 = 28
3x1 + 7x2 = 84
0 + 7x2 = 84,
3x1+ 0 = 84,
It may be observed here that although the iso-cost line is parallel to the second constraint
line prepresentd by 3x1 + 7x2 = 84, and this constraint does provide a side of the area of
feasible solutions, yet the problem has a unique optimal solution, given by the point D.
Since, x1=0
Since, x2=0
x1 + 2x2 = 18
x1 + 2x2 = 18
( 0 , 15 )
( 12 , 0 )
3x1 + 7x2 = 84
3x1 + 7x2 = 84
x2 = 60 / 4 = 15
x1 = 60 / 5 = 12
Z = 6x1 + 14x2
Z= 6x8 + 14 x 5 = 48 + 70 = 118
Z= 6x3.65 + 14x10.43 = 21.9 + 146.09=167.99=168
Z= 6 x 28 + 0 = 148
Z= 6 x 18 + 0 = 108
Minimum
5x1 + 4x2 = 60
0 + 4x2 = 60,
5x1+ 0 = 60,
x2
5
10.43
0
0
Since, x1=0
Since, x2=0
5x1 + 4x2 = 60
5x1 + 4x2 = 60
x1
8
3.65
28
18
Subject to contraint-->
Points
A
B
C
D
5x1 + 4x2 60
3x1 + 7x2 84
x1 + 2x2 18
x1 , x2 0
Zmin = Z = 6x1 + 14x2
Objective variable
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
Alternately, the optimal soulution to the problem may be seen to be located at an extreme
point at point A, B, C, D in our example. We can evaluate the ordinates at each of these
points as follows:
Ans:-
53
54
Objective variable
Subject to contraint-->
2x1 + x2 26,
2x1 + 4x2 56 ,
x1 - x2 -5,
x1 , x2 0
x2 = 56 / 4 = 14
x1 = 56 / 2 = 28
( 0 , 14 )
( 28, 0 )
( 0 , 14 ) ( 28 , 0 )
x2 = 5
(0,5)
( -5, 0 )
OR
N I L E S H
N I L E S H
36
28
2x 1
=2
+ x2
24
20
=
-x2
-5
x1
36
32
28
20
12
<
-4
-8
x1 , x2 0
> x1
x - axis
y-axis
56
Note:- if you are unable to find correct points from graph then cross check the answer by
solving those equation which two line intersect each other.
<
16
24
A
4
>
P A Z A R E
Feasible
Region
2x
1 +
4x
=
2x1 + x2 = 26,
2x1 + 10 = 26,
2x1 = 26 - 10,
2x1 = 16
2x1 = 16 / 2 = 8
12
Scale
x-axis - 1 cm = 4 Unit
y-axis - 1 cm = 4 Unit
16
0 + 3x2 = 30
x2 = 30 / 3 = 10
Put the value of x2 = 10 on eqn (1)
P A
P A Z A R E
P A
32
>
( -5 , 0 )
(0,5)
-x2 = -5
x1 = -5
Maximum
x1 - x2 = -5
0 - x2 = -5,
x1 - 0 = -5,
Z = 10x1 + 15x2
Z= 10 x 0 + 15 x 5 = 0 + 75 = 75
Z= 10 x 6 + 15 x 11 = 60 + 165 = 225
Z= 10 x 8 + 15 x 10 = 80 + 150 = 230
Z= 10 x 13 + 15 x 0 = 130 + 0 = 130
Since, x1=0
Since, x2=0
x2
5
11
10
0
0 + 4x2 = 56,
2x1+ 0 = 56,
x1
0
6
8
13
2x1 + 4x2 = 56
x2
Points
A
B
C
D
( 0 , 26 ) ( 13 , 0 )
Since, x1=0
Since, x2=0
x1 - x2 = -5
x1 - x2 = -5
( 0 , 26 )
( 13 , 0 )
2x1 + 4x2 = 56
2x1 + 4x2 = 56
x2 = 26
x1 = 26 / 2 = 13
2x1 + x2 = 26
0 + x2 = 26,
2x1+ 0 = 26,
Since, x1=0
Since, x2=0
2x1 + x2 = 26
2x1 + x2 = 26
Alternately, the optimal soulution to the problem may be seen to be located at an extreme
point at point A, B, C, D in our example. We can evaluate the ordinates at each of these
points as follows:
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
This problem is exhibited graphically in above figure. The feasible region is shaded. This
is significant to note here that have not considered the area below the line corresponding
to x1 - x2 = -5 for the negative values of x1 . This is because of the non negativity condition
x1 0, which implies that negative values of x1 should not be considered.
54
0 + 4x2 = 12,
x2 = 12 / 4 = 3
-3x1+ 0 = 12,
x1 = - 12 / 3 = -4
( 0 , 3 ) ( -4 , 0 )
(0,3)
( -4 , 0 )
Second Edition 2013 - 2014
Since, x1=0
Since, x2=0
(0,2)
Since, x1=0
Since, x2=0
( -1 , 0 )
0 + 3x2 = 12,
2x1+ 0 = 12,
(6,0)
;
x2 = 2
>
=2
-x
2x
12
2
1
x2 = 2
P A Z A R>E
x1
x - axis
<
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
<
y-axis
Note:- if you are unable to find correct points from graph then cross check the answer by
solving those equation which two line intersect each other.
Ans:- Let x1 & x2 be the amount invested in Bonds A and B, respectively. Using the given
data, we may state the problem as follows:
Maximise: Z = 0.07x1 + 0.10x2
Subject to x1 + x2 30000, x1 6000 , x2 12000, x1- x2 0,
x1 , x2 0
55
Ex (4):- A retired person wants to invest upto an amount of Rs 30,000 in fixed income
securities. His broker recommends investing in two bonds: Bond A yielding 7% and Bond
B yielding 10%. After some condideration, he decides to invest at most Rs 12,000 in Bond
B and at least Rs 6,000 in Bond A. He also wants the amount invested in Bond A to be at
least equal to the amount invested in Bond B. What should the broker recommend if the
investor wants to maximise his return on investment? Solve graphically.
On the next page, check the correct points from calculation of two intersect lines
OR
P A Z A R E
Z = 3x1 + 5x2
Z= 3 x 0.75 + 5 x 3.5 = 2.25 + 17.5 = 19.75
Z= 3 x 0.8 + 5 x 3.6 = 18 + 18 = 20.40
Z= 3 x 4 + 5 x 6 = 12 + 30 = 42
Z= 3 x 4 + 5 x 2 = 12 + 10 = 22
Z= 3 x 3 + 5 x 2 = 9 + 10 = 19
minimise
x2
3.5
3.6
6.0
2.0
2.0
x1
0.75
0.8
4.0
4.0
3.0
Alternately, the optimal soulution to the problem may be seen to be located at an extreme
point at point A, B, C, D, E in our example. We can evaluate the ordinates at each of these
points as follows:
Points
A
B
C
D
E
N I L E S H
P A
-3
x 1+
=
4x 2
Feasible
Region
2x
E D
1 +
3x
2 =
12
P A
N I L E S H
x1 = 4
0 + 5x2 = 18
x2 = 18 / 5 = 3.6
x2
7
( 0, 2 )
(4,0)
Scale
x-axis - 1 cm = 1 Unit
y-axis - 1 cm = 1 Unit
(0,4)
( 6, 0 )
(0,4)
x2 = 12 / 3 = 4
x1 = 12 / 2 = 6
x1 = 4
(0,2)
( -1 , 0 )
2x1 + 3x2 = 12
-x2 = -2,
x2 = 2
x1 = -2 / 2 = -1
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
2x1 + 3x2 = 12
2x1 + 3x2 = 12
0 - x2 = -2,
2x1+ 0 = -2,
2x1- x2 = -2
55
56
Objective variable
Subject to contraint-->
( 0, 1 ) ( 1 , 0 )
x2
( in 000 Rs. )
x=
30
=0
- x2
N I L E S H
2
18
00
12
x2 = 12000
x1
x - axis
30
27
24
21
18
15
<
12
P A Z A R >E
<
( in 000 Rs. )
y-axis
Ans:- Let x1 & x2 be the number of dresses of types A and B respectively. Using the given
information, the linear programming problem may be stated as follows:
Maximise: Z = 160x1 + 180x2 Total profit
OR
50
x1
x1
x2
20
x2
Man-Hrs
Cloth material
x2
x2
24
x1
36
x2
24
Machine-Hrs
x1 , x2 0
x2
50 + 20 = 1
x1 x2
+
= 1
50 20
36
56
+
30 30
x1
On the next page, check the correct points from calculation of two intersect lines
x1
= 1
Since x1 = 0 , 0 + 20 = 1 ,
x1
Since x2 = 0 ,
+0 = 1,
50
Since x1 = 0 , 0 +
x2
24
= 1,
x2 = 20 x 1 = 20
( 0 , 20 )
x1 = 50 x 1 = 50
( 50 , 0 )
x2 = 24 x 1 = 24
( 0 , 24 )
Second Edition 2013 - 2014
The Z - value is maximum at point D. Accordingly, the optimal solution is invest Rs. 1800 in
Bond A and Rs. 1200 in Bond B. It would yield a return of Rs. 2460.
Subject to
Z = 0.07x1 + 0.10x2
Z= 0.07x6000 + 0.10x 0 = 420 + 0 = 420
Z= 0.07x6000 + 0.10x6000 = 420 + 600 = 1020
Z= 0.07x12000 + 0.10x12000 = 840 + 1200 = 2040
Z= 0.07x18000 + 0.10x12000 = 1260 + 1200 = 2460
Z= 0.07x30000 + 0.10x 0 = 2100 + 0 = 2100
P A Z A R E
x2
0
6000
12000
12000
0
Ex (5):- A manufacturer employs three inputs: man hours, machine-hours and cloth material to manufacture to types of dresses. Type A dress fetches him a profit of Rs 160 per
piece, while type B, that of Rs 180 per piece. The manufacturer has enough man-hours to
manufacture 50 pieces of type A or 20 pieces of type B dresses per day while the machinehours he possesses suffice only ofr 36 pieces of type A or for 24 pieces for type B dresses.
Cloth material available per day is limited but sufficient enough for 30 pieces of either type
of dress. formulate the linear programming model and solve it graphically.
x1
6000
6000
12000
18000
30000
N I L E S H
Points
A
B
C
D
E
Note:- if you are unable to find correct points from graph then cross check the answer by
solving those equation which two line intersect each other.
Alternately, the optimal soulution to the problem may be seen to be located at an extreme
point at point A, B, C, D, E in our example. We can evaluate the ordinates at each of these
points as follows:
P A
Scale
x-axis - 1 cm = 6 Unit
y-axis - 1 cm = 6 Unit
P A
Feasible
Region
x1
At point C, eqn (2) & eqn (4) intersect & Put the value of x2=12000 on eqn (2)
x1 - x2 = 0 ;
x1 - 12000 = 0 ;
x1 = 12000
x+
24
x1 = 6000
30
>
x1 - x2 = 0
( 6000 , 0 ) ;
( 12000 , 0 )
(30000 , 0 )
x1 = 6000
x2 = 12000
( 0 ,30000)
(30000 , 0 )
( 0 ,30000)
x2 = 30000
x1 = 30000
x1 + x2 = 30000
0 + x2= 30000,
x1+ 0 = 30000,
Since, x1=0
Since, x2=0
x1 + x2 = 30000
x1 + x2 = 30000
x1 + x2 30000, x1 6000 ,
x1- x2 0,
x1 , x2 0
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
x2
24
x1
x2
= 1
x1
Since x2 = 0 ,
= 1,
30
30
+0 = 1,
x1 = 30 x 1 = 30
( 30 , 0 )
x2
x1
x2
= 1
Scale
x-axis - 1 cm = 5 Unit
y-axis - 1 cm = 5 Unit
N I L E S H
B
x1
Feasible
Region
50
x2
20
= 1
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
<
y-axis
N I L E S H
Note:- if you are unable to find correct points from graph then cross check the answer by
solving those equation which two line intersect each other.
Ans:- Let
x1 : Investment in Portfolio 1
The LPP may be expressed as under:
Maximise:
Z = 0.10x1 + 0.20x2
Total Return
Subject to
OR
On the next page, check the correct points from calculation of two intersect lines
57
The Z - value is maximum at point C. Accordingly, the optimal solution calls for producing
18 units of type A dress and 12 units of type B dress. Total profit is Rs. 5040.
x2 : Investment in Portfolio 2
Z = 160x1 + 180x2
Z=0+0=0
Z= 160 x 0 + 180 x 20 = 0 + 360 = 3600
Z= 160 x 14 + 180 x 15 = 2400 + 2520 = 4920
Z= 160 x 18 + 180 x 12 = 2880 + 2160 = 5040
Z= 160 x 30 + 180 x 0 = 4800 + 0 = 4800
x2
0
20
14
12
0
x1
0
0
15
18
30
Points
O
A
B
C
D
Ex (6):- Let us assume that you have inherited Rs 100000 from your father-in-law that can
be invested in a combination of only two stock protfolios, with the maximum investment
allowed in either portfolio set at Rs 75000. The first portfolio has an average return of 10%,
whereas the second has 20 & In terms of risk factors associated with these portfolios, the
first has a risk rating of 4 (on a scale from 0 to 10), and the second has 9. since you want
to maximise your return, you will not accept an average rate of return below 12% or a risk
factor above 6. Hence, you then face the important question. How much should you invest
in each portfolio? Formulate has this as a linear programming problem and solve it by
graphic method.
Alternately, the optimal soulution to the problem may be seen to be located at an extreme
point at point O, A, B, C, D in our example. We can evaluate the ordinates at each of these
points as follows:
P A Z A R E
P A
x - axis
P A
> x1
P A Z A R E
24
0 + 60x2 = 720
x2 = 720 / 60 = 12
36
0 + 120x2 = 1860
x2 = 1860 / 120 = 14
= 1
30
15
<
>
30
10
20
( 0 , 30 )
x1
25
x2 = 30 x 1 = 30
35
30
( 36 , 0 )
x2
30
x2
>
30
Since x1 = 0 , 0 +
x1 = 36 x 1 = 36
30
= 1
36
+0 = 1,
30
Since x2 = 0 ,
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
x2
x1
= 1
x1
57
58
( 0 , 0.67)
( 1.5 , 0 )
( in 000 Rs. )
Since, x1=1
Since, x2=1
( 0 , 0.25)
110
90
80
70
60
50
40
0 + 5x2 = 200000
x2 = 200000 / 5 = 40000
Put the value of x2 = 40000 on eqn (1)
x2 = 100000 - 75000
x2 = 25000
we get the points x1 = 75000, x2 = 25000
x1 + x2 = 100000,
x1 + 40000 = 100000
x1 = 100000 - 40000
x1 = 60000,
we get the points x1=60000, x2=40000
for point A
Evidently, Rs. 60000 should be invested in Portfolio 1 and Rs. 40000 in Portfolio 2. It would
yield a maximum return of Rs. 14000, while meeting all the given requirments.
Note:- if you are unable to find correct points from graph then cross check the answer by
solving those equation which two line intersect each other.
58
Z = 0.10x1 + 0.20x2
Z=0+0=0
Z= 0.10x60000 + 0.20x40000=6000 + 8000 = 14000
Z= 0.10x75000 + 0.20x25000=7500 + 5000 = 12500
Z= 0.10x75000 + 0.20x18750=7500 + 3750 = 11250
30
P A Z A R E
Points
x1
x2
O
0
0
A
60000 40000
B
75000 25000
C
75000 18750
( in 000 Rs. )
Alternately, the optimal soulution to the problem may be seen to be located at an extreme
point at point O, A,B,C in our example. We can evaluate the ordinates at each of these
points as follows:
x - axis
20
<
(4,0)
x1
-2x1 + 8x2 = 0 ,
Since, x2=1
-2x1 + 8 x 1= 0 ,
-2x1 + 8 = 0
2x1 = 8 ;
x1 = 8 / 2 = 4
10
<
N
I L E S >H
y-axis
-2x1 + 8x2 = 0 ,
Since, x1=1
-2 x 1 + 8x2 = 0, -2 + 8x2 = 0,
8x2 = 2 ;
x2 = 2 / 8 = 0.25
0C
x2
P A
Since, x2=1
P A Z A R E
Scale
x-axis - 1 cm = 10 Unit
y-axis - 1 cm = 10 Unit
Since, x1=1
8
-2x 1 +
P A
-2x1 + 3x2 = 0 ,
Since, x2=1
-2x1 + 3 x 1= 0 ,
-2x1 + 3 = 0
2x1 = 3 ;
x1 = 3 / 2 = 1.5
10
( 75000 , 0 )
-2x1 + 3x2 = 0 ,
Since, x1=1
-2 x 1 + 3x2 = 0, -2 + 3x2 = 0,
3x2 = 2 ;
x2 = 2 / 3 = 0.67
-2
x 1+
3x 2
>Region
x2 = 75000
Feasible
20
( 0 , 100000) (100000 , 0 )
( 75000 , 0 ) ;
40
x1 = 75000
x1 + x2 = 100000
N I L E S H
( 0 ,100000)
(100000 , 0 )
x1 75000
x2 = 100000
x1 = 100000
50
00
0 + x2= 100000,
x1+ 0 = 100000,
60
30
x2 75000
0
00
1
x2
70
+
x1
x2 75000,
x1 , x2 0
x1 75000 ;
-2x1 + 8x2 0 ;
x1 + x2 100000 ;
-2x1 + 3x2 0 ;
80
90
Subject to
100
Tip :Take opposite direction of sign for selecting comman intersect region.
i.e. sign then <-- direction
and sign then --> direction
>
x2
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
100
59
Accordingly, the LPP can be stated as follows:
Maximise: Z = 2250x1 + 2300x2 + 2400x3 - 200000
Subject to : 20 x1 60 ;
70 x2 140 ;
x1 + x2 120 ;
x1 + x2 + x3 = 200 ;
Subject to:
20 x1 60 ;
x1 + x2 120 ;
x1 = 60
x1 = 20
>
100
E
C
x
1
60
40
=1
80
+x
=1
40
20
180
+x
160
140
20
<
Scale
x-axis - 1 cm = 20 Unit
y-axis - 1 cm = 20 Unit
120
60
x2 = 70
100
80
20
Condition (ii)
Condition (iv)
Feasible
>Region
40
120
> x1
x - axis
y-axis
59
140
160
Maximise:
P A Z A R E
With a hiring free of Rs. 200000 , the objective function can be expressed as:
x2
N I L E S H
<
P A Z A R E
P A
The travel agent wishes to determine the number of packages to offer in each type so as
to maximise the total profit.
a) Formulate this as a linear programming problem
b) Restate the above LPP in terms of two decision variables, taking advantage of the fact
that 200 packages will be sold.
c) Find the optimal solution using graphical method for the restated problem and
interpret your results.
Ans:a) Let x1 , x2 & x2 be the number of packages of Deluxe, Standard & Economy types,
respectively. From the given information, unit profit for each of the 3 types can be
obtained as under:
Deluxe Package
:
10000 - (3000 + 4750 ) = 2250
Standard Package
:
7000 - ( 2200 + 2500 ) = 2300
Economy Package :
6500 - ( 1900 + 2200 ) = 2400
P A
x3 60
Hotel Costs
3000
2200
1900
N I L E S H
Price
10000
7000
6500
70 x2 140 ;
x1 , x2 , x3 0
Maximise:
x3 60
x1 , x2 , x3 0
Ex (7) :- A local travel agent is planning a charter trip to a major sea prot. The eight day and
seven night package includes the fare for rount trip, surface trasportation, board and
lodging and seleced tour options. The charter trip is restricted to 200 persons and past
experienc indicates that there will not be any problem for getting 200 clients. the problem
for the travel agent is to determine the number of Deluxe, Standard and Economy tour
packages to offer for this charter. These three plans differ according to seating and service
for the flight, quality of accommodations, meal plans and tour options. The following table
summarises the estimated prices for the tree packages and the corresponding expenses
for the travel agent. The travel agent has hired an aircraft for the flat fee of Rs. 200000 for
the entire tips. In planning the trip, the following considerations must be taken into account
i) At least 10% of the packages must be of the Deluxe type.
ii) At least 35% but not more than 70% must be of the Standard type.
iii) At least 30% must be of the Economy type.
iv) The miximum number of Deluxe packages available in any aircraft is restricted to 60
v) The hotel desires that at least 120 of the tourists should be on the Deluxe and the
Standard packages taken together.
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
60
Subject to contraint-->
4x1 + 5x2 = 30
Since, x1=0 0 + 5x2= 30, x2 = 30 / 5 = 6
4x1 + 5x2 = 30
Since, x2=0 4x1+ 0 = 30, x1 = 30 / 4 = 7.5
4x1 + 5x2 = 30
( 0 , 6 ) ( 7.5, 0 )
(0,6)
( 7.5 , 0 )
x2
5x
2
Feasible
> Region
> x1
x - axis
<
Scale
x-axis - 1 cm = 1 Unit
y-axis - 1 cm = 1 Unit
30
x2
0
6
2
0
Z = 28x1 + 30x2
Z=0+0=0
Z= 28 x 0 + 30 x 6 = 0 + 180 = 180
Z= 28 x 2 + 30 x 2 = 56 + 60 = 116
Z= 28 x 2.67 + 30 x 0 = 74.76 + 0 = 74.76
maximum
Thus, the solution is optimal at point A. The maximum is 180 can be achieved when
x1 = 0 and x2 = 6.
60
x1
0
0
2
2.67
Alternately, the optimal soulution to the problem may be seen to be located at an extreme
point at point O,A,B,C in our example.
Points
O
A
B
C
P A
18
3x1 + x2 8,
x1 , x2 0
x 2=
Subject to
4x
Z = 28x1 + 30x2
8
x =
3
2
Note:- if you are unable to find correct points from graph then cross check the answer by
solving those equation which two line intersect each other.
Ex (8):- Maximise:
P A Z A R E
+3
6x 1
P A Z A R E
7
6
N I L E S H
P A
<
y-axis
3x 1 +
N I L E S H
x1+x2=140--eq (3),
>
(0,8)
( 2.67 , 0 )
x1+x2=120--eq (2),
(0,6)
(3,0)
x2=70--eq (1),
0 + 3x2= 18, x2 = 18 / 3 = 6
6x1+ 0 = 18, x1 = 18 / 6 = 3
(0,6) (3,0)
3x1 + x2 = 8
Since, x1=0 0 + x2= 8,
x2 = 8
3x1 + x2 = 8
Since, x2=0 3x1+ 0 = 8, x1 = 8 / 3 = 2.67
3x1 + x2 = 8
( 0 , 8 ) ( 2.67 , 0 )
3x1 + x2 8,
x1 , x2 0
Thus, maximum profit of Rs. 267000 can be achieved when x1= 20 , x3 = 100 and x3 = 80
Since x1+ x2 + x3 = 200
So, Put x1 = 20 & x2= 100 on eqn
20 + 100 + x3= 200 ;
120 + x3 = 200
x3 = 200 - 120
x3 = 80
x2
70
70
80
120
100
x1
50
60
60
20
20
Objective variable
Points
A
B
C
D
E
Ans:-
Alternately, the optimal soulution to the problem may be seen to be located at an extreme
point at point A,B,C,D,E in our example. We can evaluate the ordinates at each of these
points as follows:
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
61
12
07
C
Demand
500
007
013
008
014
300
006
016
011
007
200
Demand
180
150
350
320
1000
220
016
011
007
200
00
150
350
320
820
670
From / To
12
Supply
013
170
N I L E S H
180
10
150
012
170
07
13
008
014
300
06
16
011
007
200
00
00
350
320
670
00
P A Z A R E
Demand
180
500
820
61
12
07
13
008
06
16
Demand
00
00
Q
180
10
R
150
Supply
013
000
014
300
011
007
200
180 00
320
500 320
012
170
180
00
120
Step 1:- Start the north west corner and above table, AP cell, Find out which value is small
i.e. demand value or supply value. And from observation, it found that the demand
value is small, so put the demand value in AP cell and substract the demand
value from demand & supply cell.
i.e., after substracting the value of demand & supply, we get
demand = 180 - 180 = 0 & supply = 500 - 180 = 220.
Repeat the same step till the Demand & Supply value become zero ( 0 ).
From / To
013
06
012
300
010
014
Step 3:- Start the north west corner and above table, AR cell, Find out which value is small
i.e. demand value or supply value. And from observation, it found that the supply
value is small, so put the supply value in AR cell and substract the supply
value from demand & supply cell.
i.e., after substracting the value of demand & supply, we get
demand = 350 - 170 = 180 & supply = 170 - 170 = 0.
Repeat the same step till the Demand & Supply value become zero ( 0 ).
Supply
180
008
012
013
170
220
150
P A
P A
From / To
013
010
012
180
Step 2:- Start the north west corner and above table, AQ cell, Find out which value is small
i.e. demand value or supply value. And from observation, it found that the demand
value is small, so put the demand value in AQ cell and substract the demand
value from demand & supply cell.
i.e., after substracting the value of demand & supply, we get
demand = 150 - 150 = 0 & supply = 220 - 150 = 170.
Repeat the same step till the Demand & Supply value become zero ( 0 ).
P A Z A R E
Supply
N I L E S H
Obtaining the initial Feasible Solution: The first step in using the transportation method is
to obtain a feasible solution, namely, the one that satisfies the rim requirements (i.e. the
requirments of demand and supply). The initial feasible solution can be obtained by
several methods. The commonly used are the Nort-West Corner (NWC) Rule, Least Cost
Method (LCM) and the Vogels Appoximation Method (VAM).
From / To
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
62
12 180
10 150
013
07
13
012 170
008 180
014 120
170 00
120 00
06
16
011
007
200
Demand
00
00
000 00
320 200
320 200
N I L E S H
07
13
08 180
06
16
11
Demand
00
00
00
10
150
12
170
00
Supply
013
000
014 120
007 200
000 00
200 00
200
00
200
00
00
D2
D3
D4
Demand
S1
010
006
018
023
300
S2
004
009
013
010
200
S3
007
013
015
005
400
Supply
150
200
200
350
900
62
Step 1:- From above table, first find the least value from whole table and assign that least
value from demand & supply value and above table the cell S2D1 value is least
value i.e. 4. Now allocate the lower value from supply & demand i.e. 150 in S2D1
cell Now the column is satisfied by this allocation, the row total revised.
i.e. substracting the lower value from supply & demand, we get
Step 6:- Start the north west corner and above table, CS cell, Find out which value is small
i.e. demand value or supply value. And from observation, it found that the supply
& demand value are both small, so put the value in CS cell and substract the
value from demand & supply cell.
i.e., after substracting the value of demand & supply, we get
demand = 200 - 200 = 0 & supply = 200 - 200 = 0.
12
D1
180
P A Z A R E
From / To
P A
From / To
P A
P A Z A R E
N I L E S H
Step 5:- Start the north west corner and above table, BS cell, Find out which value is small
i.e. demand value or supply value. And from observation, it found that the supply
value is small, so put the supply value in BS cell and substract the supply
value from demand & supply cell.
i.e., after substracting the value of demand & supply, we get
demand = 320 - 120 = 200 & supply = 120 - 120 = 0.
Repeat the same step till the Demand & Supply value become zero ( 0 ).
Supply
From / To
Leas Cost Method (LCM) :As the name suggests, this method entails making allocation at each step by selecting from the routes (that is, combinations of soures and destinations) available, the one
with the minimum cost. To begin, we choose the cell which has the minimum cost,
consider the supply available at the source (ai) and the demand at the destination (b j)
corresponding to that, and allocate the lower of the two (ai or bj) to the cell. After this, we
delete the row or column (or both if ai = bj ) whichever is satisfied by this allocation. If the
row is deleted, then the column value (bj) is revised by subtracting the quantity assigned.
Similarly, if the column is deleted, then the row total is revised. After this, we consider the
routes remaining and again choose the one with the least cost, make assignment and
adjust the row/column total. We continue in this manner until all the units are assigned.
It may be mentioned that at any stage, if there is a tie in the minimum cost, so that two
or more routes have the same least cost of shipping, then, conceptually, either of them
may be selected. However, a better initial solution is obtained if the route chosen is the
one where larges quantity can be assigned. Thus, if there are three cells for which the
(least) cost value is equal, then consider all of these one by one and determine the
quantity (by reference to the demand and supply quantities given) which can be despatched, and choose the cell with the largest quantity. If there is still a tie, then either of
them may be selected.
Step 4:- Start the north west corner and above table, BR cell, Find out which value is small
i.e. demand value or supply value. And from observation, it found that the demand
value is small, so put the demand value in BR cell and substract the demand
value from demand & supply cell.
i.e., after substracting the value of demand & supply, we get
demand = 180 - 180 = 0 & supply = 300 - 180 = 120.
Repeat the same step till the Demand & Supply value become zero ( 0 ).
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
010
Supply
150
006
018
023
300
009
013
010
200
013
015
005
400
200
200
350
900
50
Step 4:- From above table, first find the least value from whole table and assign that least
value from demand & supply value and above table the cell S2D2 value is least
value i.e. 13. Now allocate the lower value from supply & demand i.e. 50 in S2D2
cell Now the column is satisfied by this allocation, the row total revised.
i.e. substracting the lower value from supply & demand, we get
Repeat the same step till the Demand & Supply value become zero ( 0 ).
750
D3
D4
Demand
S1
10
006
018
023
300
S2
04 150
009
013
010
050
P A Z A R E
Supply
07
00
013
015
200
200
005 350
350 00
400 50
750 400
10
006
018
23
300
S2
04 150
009
013
10
050
S3
07
013
015
05
Supply
00
200 00
200
00
200
350
100
050
050
013
07
13
015
00
00
00
150
50
05
50
350
00
00
050
150
100
N I L E S H
P A Z A R E
Repeat the same step till the Demand & Supply value become zero ( 0 ).
From / To
D1
D2
D3
D4
Demand
S1
10
06
018
23
100
S2
04 150
09
013 50
10
000
S3
07
13
015 50
05
Supply
00
00 00
100 50
00
200
350
050 00
100 50
Step 5:- From above table, first find the least value from whole table and assign that least
value from demand & supply value and above table the cell S1D3 value is least
value i.e. 18. Now allocate the lower value from supply & demand i.e. 100 in S1D3
cell Now the column is satisfied by this allocation, the row total revised.
i.e. substracting the lower value from supply & demand, we we get
supply= 100 - 100 = 00 & demand = 100 - 100 = 00.
400 200
63
S1
10
09
Demand
Supply
100
D4
D3
S3
150
23
D2
04
018
D1
S2
200
Demand
Step 5:- From above table, first find the least value from whole table and assign that least
value from demand & supply value and above table the cell S3D3 value is least
value i.e. 15. Now allocate the lower value from supply & demand i.e. 50 in S3D3
cell Now the column is satisfied by this allocation, the row total revised.
i.e. substracting the lower value from supply & demand, we we get
Step 3:- From above table, first find the least value from whole table and assign that least
value from demand & supply value and above table the cell S1D2 value is least
value i.e. 6. Now allocate the lower value from supply & demand i.e. 200 in S1D2
cell Now the column is satisfied by this allocation, the row total revised.
i.e. substracting the lower value from supply & demand, we get
supply= 200 - 200 = 0 & demand = 300 - 200 = 100.
From / To
06
D4
P A
D2
10
P A
D1
S1
D3
N I L E S H
From / To
D2
Repeat the same step till the Demand & Supply value become zero ( 0 ).
D1
From / To
Step 2:- From above table, first find the least value from whole table and assign that least
value from demand & supply value and above table the cell S3D4 value is least
value i.e. 5. Now allocate the lower value from supply & demand i.e. 350 in S3D4
cell Now the column is satisfied by this allocation, the row total revised.
i.e. substracting the lower value from supply & demand, we get
S3
007
Demand
S3
D4
004
D3
S2
150
D2
D1
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
From / To
63
10
06
S2
04 150
09
D3
200
018
100
013 50
015
Supply
00
00 00
100 00
10
05
000
350
00
00
000
10000
Repeat the same step till the Demand & Supply value become zero ( 0 ).
06
60
04
02
05
10
100
02
06
05
01
40
Supply
20
50
50
80
200
08
06
60
6-3=3
04
02
05
10
100
4-2=2
02
06
05
01 40
40 00
2-1=1
Demand
20
50
50
80 40
200 160
Iteration
4-2=2
3-2=1
5-5=0
6-1=5
N I L E S H
P A Z A R E
Repeat the same step till the Demand & Supply value become zero ( 0 ).
From / To
Supply
Iteration
10
03
08
06
60
6-3=3
04
02
05
10
80
4-2=2
02
06
05
01
00
----
Demand
20
50
50
40
Iteration
10-4=6
3-2=1
8-5=3
10-6=4
20
00
40
160
140
Step 3:- To begin with, the cost differences between the pairs of least cost cell are taken
for each row & column. The largest of these being 4 ( =10 -6), the column designat-ed 4 is selected. In the lowest cost cell of this column, A4, a value 40 assigned
and the column 4 is deleted. The requirment at warehouse A is revised at 20
supply= 60 - 40 = 20 & demand = 40 - 40 = 00.
64
08
03
03
10
10
Iteration
Supply
Supply
Step 2:- To begin with, the cost differences between the pairs of least cost cell are taken
for each row & column. The largest of these being 6 ( =10 -4), the column designat-ed 1 is selected. In the lowest cost cell of this column, B1, a value 20 assigned
and the column 1 is deleted. The requirment at warehouse B is revised at 80
P A
P A
P A Z A R E
N I L E S H
Vogels Approximation Method (VAM) :The Vogels Approximation Method, commonly known as VAM, is another cost-based
method used for obtaining initial solution to a transportation problem. Actually, it user cost
differentials rather than absolute costs, to select the appropriate cell to make allocations.
First, consider every row of the cost matrix individually and find the difference between
two least cost cells in it. Then, repeat the exercise for every column. Consider all cost
difference and identify the row or column with the largest value. Now, focus on the cell with
the smallest cost in the row or column so chosen and make allocation in that. The number
of units allocated would be lower of the corresponding supply and demand values. In
case of a tie in the larges cost difference, although either of them may be chosen, it is
preferable to choosen the cost difference corresponding to which the larges number of
units may be assigned or corresponding to which the cell chosen has minmum cost. To
illustrate, suppose the larges cost difference is found to be tied for a row and a column. In
applying the first of the rules, determine the quantity (condidering the available supply and
demand) which can be assigned in each case and select the one where larger quantity
can be assigned. In the other case, unit cost values of the two least cost cells, in the row
and column and choose the one which has a lower value.
Delete the row or column which has been satisfied by the allocation and adjust the
quantity of demand/supply. Recalculate the cost difference for the reduced matrix and
proceed in the same manner as discussed above para. Continue with the process until
all units have been assigned.
From / To
13
00
100
07
23
Step 1:- To begin with, the cost differences between the pairs of least cost cell are taken
for each row & column. The largest of these being 5 ( =6 -1), the column designat-ed 4 is selected. In the lowest cost cell of this column, C4, a value 40 assigned
and the row C is deleted. The requirment at warehouse 4 is revised at 40
S3
Demand
50
D4
D2
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
D1
From / To
64
04
20
Supply
03
08
06
02
05
10
40
80
01
Demand
00
50
50
40
3-2=1
8-5=3
10-6=4
140
---100
Supply
008
004
010
100
009
007
009
800
006
005
008
150
004
003
003
400
Demand
750
200
500
1450
10
03
Supply
08
06
40
20
00
8-3=5
P A Z A R E
Demand
04
02
02
06
00
50
3-2=1
05
01
50
00
8-5=3
40
00
80
5-2=3
40
----
100
80
Supply
008 100
004
010
100 /0
009
007
009
800
006
005
008
150
004
003
003
400
200
500
1450
C
D
P A Z A R E
Demand 750
/650
/1350
----
04
20
02
30
08
05
06
50
40
10
Supply
00
00
80
40
02
06
05
01
Demand
00
50 30
50
00 00
00
40
Iteration
---5-2=3
03
----
80 0
Supply
004
010
007
009
800
008
009
006
005
008
150
004
003
003
400
200
500
1350
Demand 650
65
100
650
/0
/150
10
3
20
From / To
From / To X
Step 5:- Finally, only one row is left and therefore, no cost differences need to be recalculated. The allocations for each of the cells remaining are made having reference to the
requirments: 30 to B2, and 50 to B3.
supply= 30 - 30 = 00 & demand = 80 - 30 = 50 and finally demand = 50 - 50 = 0
Step 2:- Start the north west corner i.e. BX cell, Find out which value is small i.e. demand
value or supply value. And from observation, it found that the supply & demand
value is small are both same, put the value in BX cell and substract the supply
value from demand & supply cell. Repeat the same step.
----
30
10
Iteration
05
N I L E S H
From / To X
Iteration
P A
20
P A
20
From / To
Repeat the same step till the Demand & Supply value become zero ( 0 ).
N I L E S H
Step 1:- Start the north west corner i.e. AX cell, Find out which value is small i.e. demand
value or supply value. And from observation, it found that the supply value is small
so put the supply value in AX cell and substract the supply value from demand &
supply cell. Repeat the same step till the Demand & Supply value become zero.
Step 4:- To begin with, the cost differences between the pairs of least cost cell are taken
for each row & column. The largest of these being 5 ( =8 -3), the column designat-ed 2 is selected. In the lowest cost cell of this column, A2, a value 20 assigned
and the row 1 is deleted. The requirment at warehouse 2 is revised at 30
----
00
40
From / To
05
5-2=3
06
6-3=3
02
Total Cost = 3 x 20 + 6 x 40 + 4 x 20 + 2 x 30 + 5 x 50 + 1 x 40
Total Cost = 60 + 240 + 80 + 60 + 250 + 40 = Rs. 730
Iteration
40
Iteration
60
20
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
10
65
/700
Second Edition 2013 - 2014
66
From / To X
04
06
05
009
150
005
008
150
003
003
400
04
03
003
Demand 00
00
500
500
700
/550
650
04
06
05
04
03
/0
000
008
150
003
400
500
550
/400/0
P A Z A R E
Repeat the same step till the Demand & Supply value become zero ( 0 ).
/100
/500
500
/0
From / To X
Supply
008
004
010
100
009
007
009
800
006
005
008
150
003
400
500
/1250
1450
200
D
004
003
Demand 750
200
/0
/200
50
50
009
/400/0
400
/0
N I L E S H
Demand 00
07
000
400
100
09
010
100
Step 1:- In LCM, the least cost is find from table but here 3 is come twice, so find least
value from DY & DZ. And here DY is least value. Now allocate the lower value from
supply & demand in DY cell. Now the column is satisfied by this allocation,
the row total revised. Substracting the lower value from supply & demand.
150
008
66
Step 2:- From above table, find the least value from whole table and assign that least
value from demand & supply value and above table the cell DZ value is least
value i.e. 3. Now allocate the lower value from supply & demand i.e. 200 in DZ
cell Now the row is satisfied by this allocation, the column total revised.
i.e. substracting the lower value from supply & demand, we get
Step 5:- Finally, Z column is remains and start the north west corner i.e. CZ and put the
small value in that CZ cell i.e. 100 and remaing value put on the DZ cell i.e. 400.
And finally, the total cost value is calculate.
P A
08
50
Supply
P A Z A R E
100
150
P A
07
N I L E S H
Step 4:- Start the north west corner i.e. CY cell, Find out which value is small i.e. demand
value or supply value. And from observation, it found that the demand value is
small so put the demand value in CY cell and substract the demand value from
demand & supply cell. Repeat the same step till the Demand & Supply value
become zero ( 0 ).
From / To X
650
200
/50
/0
Demand 00
/0
000
09
06
000
150
009
Supply
010
007
000
650
010
09
04
08
004
Supply
08
100
From / To X
100
Step 3:- Start the north west corner i.e. BY cell, Find out which value is small i.e. demand
value or supply value. And from observation, it found that the supply value is small
so put the supply value in BY cell and substract the supply value from demand &
supply cell. Repeat the same step till the Demand & Supply value become zero.
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
67
008
04
010
100
009
07
009
800
006
05
008
150
004
03
Demand 750
00
003
/300
200
/0
/1050
1250
From / To X
500
200
Supply
008
04
10
100
009
07
09
800
006
05
08
150
03 200
03
00
300
Supply
04
10
000
/0
008
009500
006150
07
09 300
800 /500/0
05
08
000
004
03 200
03 200
000
00
300 /0
800 /500/0
C
D
Demand 500/0
N I L E S H
N I L E S H
100
Step 3:- From above table, first find the least value from whole table and assign that least
value from demand & supply value and above table the cell CX value is least
value i.e. 6. Now allocate the lower value from supply & demand i.e. 150 in CX
cell. Now the column is satisfied by this allocation, the row total revised. Substracting the lower value from supply & demand. Repeat the same step again.
From / To X
supply= 800 - 300 = 500 & demand = 300 - 300 = 0 for BZ cell allocate 300
and finally supply= 500 - 500 = 0 & demand 500 - 500 = 0 for BX cell allocate 500
200
Step 5:- Finally, only one row is left and therefore, assign the least value from that row and
The allocations for each of the cells remaining are made having reference to the
requirments: 300 to BZ, and 500 to BX.
Supply
From / To X
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
P A Z A R E
004
200
000
1050/900
Step 1:- To begin with, the cost differences between the pairs of least cost cell are taken
for each row & column. The largest of these being 5 ( =8 -3), the column designat-ed 3 is selected. In the lowest cost cell of this column, DZ, a value 400 assigned
and the row D is deleted. The requirment at column Z is revised 100
P A Z A R E
100
009
07
09
800
006 150
05
08
000
004
03 200
03
00
300
Supply
Iteration
004
010
100
8-4=4
009
007
009
800
9-7=2
006
005
008
150
400
004
003
003
Demand
750
200
500
Iteration
6-4=2
4-3=1
8-3=5
000
6-5=1
/0
400
/100
4-3=1
/1050
1450
200
008
10
04
/0
Supply
008
100
From / To
Repeat the same step till the Demand & Supply value become zero ( 0 ).
900 /800
67
Step 4:- From above table, first find the least value from whole table and assign that least
value from demand & supply value and above table the cell AX value is least
value i.e. 8. Now allocate the lower value from supply & demand i.e. 100 in AXcell.
Now the row is satisfied by this allocation, the column total revised. Substracting
the lower value from supply & demand. Repeat the same step again.
From / To X
P A
/0
P A
150
68
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
Iteration
008
004 100
010
100 /0
8-4=4
009
007
009
800
9-7=2
006
005
008
150
6-5=1
400
003
003
/100
200
Iteration
8-6=2
5-4=1
100
1050
9-8=1
N I L E S H
Repeat the same step till the Demand & Supply value become zero ( 0 ).
Supply
008
004 100
010
000
----
009
007
009
800
9-7=2
006
005
008
150
/150
750
Iteration
9-6=3
/600
100
/100
7-5=2
100
9-8=1
000
950
004
Demand
600
/0
009
005
008
003
003
100
/0
100
100
800
/700/600/0
000
400
/0
000
800
/700/600/0
N I L E S H
C1
C2
C3
Capacity
10
B
C
P A Z A R E
Requirment
15
11
13
80
15
75
20
50
Iteration
6-5=1
----
/800
150
100
Note:-
In above table, the requirment total is 145 and Capacity total is 105. So table is not
balanced. Thats why in Dummy Row taken in table with the difference value of
Capacity & Requirment i.e. 145 - 105 = 40. So 40 value taken in Dummy row
Now the table are as follows, after taking the Dummy.
From / To
C1
C2
C3
Capacity
10
15
11
13
80
15
Dummy
40
Requirment
75
20
50
Step 4:- Finally, only one row is left and therefore, no cost differences need to be recalcu-lated. The allocations for each of the cells remaining are made having reference
to the requirments: 100 to BY, 100 To BZ and 60 to BX.
68
Demand
003
006
007
003
600
004
009
400
/0
Now find out the feasible solution using various method i.e. NWC, LCM and VAM.
QDM notes for MBA
000
010
From / To
008
P A
P A
Step 3:- To begin with, the cost differences between the pairs of least cost cell are taken
for each row & column. The largest of these being 3 ( =9 -6), the column designat-ed 6 is selected. In the lowest cost cell of this column, CY, a value 150 assigned
and the row C is deleted. The requirment at column X is revised 600
P A Z A R E
750
---/950
Supply
Demand
000
004 100
004
Supply
From / To
From / To
Repeat the same step till the Demand & Supply value become zero ( 0 ).
supply= 800 - 100 = 700 & demand = 100 - 100 = 0 for BY cell allocate 100 ,
supply= 700 - 100 = 600 & demand = 100 - 100 = 0 for BZ cell allocate 100 ,
and finally supply= 600 - 600 = 0 & demand = 600 - 600 = 0 for BX cell allocate 600
Step 2:- To begin with, the cost differences between the pairs of least cost cell are taken
for each row & column. The largest of these being 4 ( =8 -4), the column designat-ed 4 is selected. In the lowest cost cell of this column, AY, a value 100 assigned
and the row A is deleted. The requirment at column Y is revised 100
69
10
15
11
13
80
06
05
04
15
00
00
40
Requirment
75 /65
20
50
145 /135
13
00
5 5
04
15 /10
Dummy
00
40
Requirment
0 /0
5 /0
50
55 /50
05 10
C2
03
C3
08
Capacity
00
P A Z A R E
13
80
06
05
04
15
Dummy
00
00
00
40
Requirment
65 /0
20
50
135 /70
/15
C3
Capacity
03
08
00
11 15
05 5
13
00
04 /10
00 /40
10 /0
40 /0
50 /40/0
50 /40/0
P A Z A R E
Dummy
Requirment
06
00
0 /0
00
0
/0
Total Cost = 5 x 10 + 15 x 65 + 11 x 15 + 5 x 5 + 4 x 10 + 0 x 40
Total Cost = 50 + 975 + 165 + 25 + 40 + 0 = Rs. 1255
Capacity
03
08
00
05 10
15 65
11 15
13
15
06
05
04
15
Dummy
00
00
00
40
Requirment
00 /0
20 /5
50
70
/0
From / To
C1
C2
C3
Capacity
10
15
11
13
80
15
40
Requirment
75
20
50
/55
69
C3
C2
C1
From / To
Step 3:- Start the north west corner i.e. BC2 cell, Find out which value is small i.e. capacity
value or requirment value. And from observation, it found that the capcity value is
small so put the capacity value in BC2 cell and substract the capacity value from
Capacity & requirment cell. Repeat the same step.
11
10
05
1565
C2
15 65
C1
P A
C1
P A
From / To
N I L E S H
From / To
N I L E S H
Step 2:- Start the north west corner i.e. BC1 cell, Find out which value is small i.e. capacity
value or requirment value. And from observation, it found that the requirment
value is small so put the requirment value in BC1 cell and substract the requirment
value from Capacity & requirment cell. Repeat the same step.
Step 5:- Finally, only one column is left and therefore Start the north west corner i.e. CC3
cell, Find out which value is small i.e. capacity value or requirment value. And
from observation, it found that the capcity value is small so put the capcity value in
CC3 cell and substracted the capcity value and balance the table.
00
00
Dummy
08
03
11 15
/0
10
05
1565
08
Capacity
Capacity
03
C3
C3
05 10
C2
C2
C1
C1
From / To
From / To
Step 4:- Start the north west corner i.e. CC2 cell, Find out which value is small i.e. capacity
value or requirment value. And from observation, it found that the requirment
value is small so put the requirment value in CC2 cell and substract the requirment
value from Capacity & requirment cell. Repeat the same step.
Step 1:- Start the north west corner i.e. AC1 cell, Find out which value is small i.e. capacity
value or requirment value. And from observation, it found that the capacity value is
small so put the capacity value in AC1 cell and substract the capactiy value from
Capacity & requirment cell. Repeat the same step.
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
70
05
03
08
10
15
11
13
80
06
05
04
15
00
00 20
Requirment
75
20
50
145
/125
40
/0
00
/20
05 10
03
08
10 /0
15
11
13
80
06
04 15
00
00
0 20
00 20
00
Requirment
60 /50
30
90 /80
From / To
A
C1
05
C2
C3
Capacity
05
03
08
10
06
P A Z A R E
13
80
05
04
15
00
00 20
00 20
20
00
50 /30
125 /105
75
/0
03
08
00
11
80 /50/0
13 30
04 15
20
20
00
P A Z A R E
Requirment
00
50
/50
00
30
00
80
/50/0
Total Cost = 5 x 10 + 15 x 50 + 13 x 30 + 4 x 15 + 0 x 20 + 0 x 20
Total Cost = 50 + 750 + 390 + 60 + 0 + 0 = Rs. 1250
Ans c) Find the feasible solution by using VAM method.
Capacity
05
03
08
10
15
11
13
80
06
05
04 /15
15 /0
00
D
Requirment
00
75
00
/60
00
20
00
30
20
105
/90
70
05
03
08
10
15
11
13
80
06
04
15
00
00 40
40
Requirment
75
20
50 /10
145 /105
C3
C2
C1
From / To
Step 1:- To begin with, the cost differences betn the pairs of least cost cell are taken for
each row & column. The largest of these being 13 (=13 -0), the column designated 0 is
selected. In the lowest cost cell of this column, DC3, a value 40 assigned and the row D is
deleted. The requirment at column C3 is revised 10
From / To
C1
C2
C3
Capacity
Step 3:- From table, first find the least value from whole table and from table the cell CC3
value is least value i.e. 4. Now allocate the lower value from Capacity i.e.15 in CC3
cell. Now the row is satisfied by this allocation, the column total revised. Repeat
the same step till the Capacity & Requirment value become zero ( 0 ).
11
06
Capacity
Requirment
15
C3
P A
C1
P A
From / To
15 50
C2
N I L E S H
10
N I L E S H
Capacity
Step 5:- Finally, only one row is left and therefore, assign the least value from that row and
The allocations for each of the cells remaining are made having reference to the
requirments: 50 to BC1, and 30 to BC3.
Step 2:- From table, first find the least value from whole table and from table the cell DC3
value is least value i.e. 0. Now allocate the lower value from Capacity i.e. 20 in DC3
cell. Now the row is satisfied by this allocation, the column total revised. Repeat
the same step till the Capacity & Requirment value become zero ( 0 ).
C3
C2
Capacity
C1
C3
From / To
C2
C1
From / To
Step 4:- From table, first find the least value from whole table and from table the cell AC1
value is least value i.e. 5. Now allocate the lower value from Capacity i.e.10 in AC1 cell.
Now the row is satisfied by this allocation, the column total revised. Repeat thesame step
till the Capacity & Requirment value become zero ( 0 ).
Step 1:- From table, first find the least value from whole table and from table the cell DC2
value is least value i.e. 0. Now allocate the lower value from Requirment i.e. 20 in
DC2 cell. Now the column is satisfied by this allocation, the row total revised.
Repeat the same step till the Capacity & Requirment value become zero ( 0 ).
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
/40
71
Capacity
Iteration
05
03
08
10
5-3=2
15
11
13
80
05
04 10
15
00
105 /95
Requirment
75
20
10 /0
Iteration
6-5=1
5-3=2
8-4=4
----
C2
05
03
Capacity
Iteration
08
10
5-3=2
P A Z A R E
15
11
13
80
05
00
00
00
00 40
Requirment
75
20 /0
00
Iteration
6-5=1
5-3=2
---
95
6-5=1
----
/75
C2
10
15
06 5
05
00
Requirment
75
60
03
/0
08
10
13
60
05 /0
00
04 10
00 40
00 /0
00
75 /65/60/0
11
20
/0
Janata(J)
Red Lamp(R)
Capacity
---
010
005
090
012
009
004
050
007
003
011
080
009
005
007
060
Dummy
000
000
000
050
Demand
120
100
110
330
05
Capacity
C3
Bharat(Bh)
C1
From / To
From / To
Step 4:- Finally, only one row is left and therefore, no cost differences need to be recalcu-lated. The allocations for each of the cells remaining are made having reference
to the requirments: 10 to AC1 , 60 To BC1 and 05 to CC1.
P A Z A R E
Note:- When the NWC method use to solve the above table, then first find which value is
small from Capacity & Demand. Then start north west corner of that row or column. In
above table Capacity value is small i.e. 90 then start to solve the problem from AJ cell
00
71
05
15-11=4
06
04 10
/60
20
C3
P A
C1
P A
From / To
N I L E S H
N I L E S H
Step 3:- To begin with, the cost differences betn the pairs of least cost cell are taken for
each row & column. The largest of these being 4 (=15 - 11), the column designated 11 is
selected. In the lowest cost cell of this column, BC2, a value 20 assigned and the column
C2 is deleted. The requirment at row B is revised 20
00
00
5-4=1
00 40
06
13-11=2
/5
Ex (3):- The XYZ Tobacco Company purchases tobacco and stores in warehouses located in the following cities:
W arehouse Location
Capacity (Tonnes)
City A
90
City B
50
City C
80
City D
60
The warehouses supply tobacco to cigarette companies in three cities that have the
following demand:
Cigarette Company
Demand (Tonnes)
Bharat
120
Janata
100
Red Lamp
110
The following railroad shipping costs per tonne(in hundred rupees)have been determined
From / To
Bharat (Bh)
Janata ( J )
Red Lamp ( R )
A
--10
05
B
12
09
04
C
07
03
11
D
09
05
07
C3
C2
C1
From / To
Total Cost = 5 x 10 + 15 x 60 + 11 x 20 + 6 x 5 + 4 x 10 + 0 x 40
Total Cost = 50 + 900 + 220 + 30 + 40 + 0 = Rs. 1240
Step 2:- To begin with, the cost differences betn the pairs of least cost cell are taken for
each row & column. The largest of these being 4 (=8 - 4), the column designated 4 is
selected. In the lowest cost cell of this column, CC3, a value 10 assigned and the column
C3 is deleted. The requirment at row C is revised 5
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
72
From / To
003
011
080
009
005
007
060
Dm
000
000
000
050
Demand
120
100
110
330
/240
/10
Capacity
P A Z A R E
---
010
90
005
000
50
/0
050
007
003
011
080
009
005
007
060
Dm
000
000
000
050
10
110
240
Demand
120
/70
/10
09
005
007
060
Dm
00
000
000
050
Demand
70 /0
10
110
190 /120
Bh
R
90
Capacity
N I L E S H
---
10
005
000
12
70
09
004
000
011
010
07
09
05
007
060
00
00
000
050
00
00
110
120
Dm
03
10
/0
P A Z A R E
Demand
/0
/110
Step 5:- Finally, one column is left i.e. R and therefore Start the north west corner i.e. DR
cell, Find out which value is small The allocations for each of the cells remaining are
made having reference to the requirments and balance the table:
i.e. Capacity = 60 - 60 = 0 & Demand = 110 - 60 = 50 and
Finally, Capacity = 50 - 50 = 0 & Demand = 50 - 50 = 0
/190
Bh
---
10
90
Capacity
005
000
004
000
50
B
C
12
07
09
70
03
10
011
000
60
09
05
007
Repeat the same step till the Demand & Supply value become zero ( 0 ).
Dm
00
00
000 50
Demand
00
00
110
72
/0
From / To
Step 3:- Start the north west corner i.e. CBh cell, Find out which value is small i.e. capacity
value or demand value. And from observation, it found that the demand value is
small so put the demand value in CBh cell and substract the demand value from
Capacity & demand cell. Repeat the same step.
/50/0
060
/0
050 /0
110
004
080
009
011
50
012
003
07
000
P A
004
P A
009
Bh
70
Step 4:- Start the north west corner i.e. CJ cell, Find out which value is small i.e. capacity
value or demand value. And from observation, it found that the both the value are same so
put any value in CJ cell and substract any value from Capacity & demand cell. Repeat the
same step.
Step 2:- Start the north west corner i.e. BBh cell, Find out which value is small i.e. capacity
value or demand value. And from observation, it found that the capacity value is
small so put the capacity value in BBh cell and substract the capactiy value from
Capacity & demand cell. Repeat the same step.
From / To
12
From / To
N I L E S H
000
007
012
005
010
050
Capacity
004
010
009
---
005
Capacity
/0
090
R
90
---
R
90
J
50
Bh
Bh
Step 1:- Start the north west corner i.e. AJ cell, Find out which value is small i.e. capacity
value or demand value. And from observation, it found that the capacity value is
small so put the capacity value in AJ cell and substract the capactiy value from
Capacity & demand cell. Repeat the same step.
From / To
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
/50/0
Second Edition 2013 - 2014
73
From / To
---
J
10
R
05
Capacity
90
20
04
07
03
11
080
7-3=4
09
05
07
060
9-5=4
Dm
00 50
00
00
000
---
190 /170
Demand
70
100
20 /0
---
10
005
090
10-5=5
Iteration
9-7=2
5-3=2
7-4=3
12
09
004
050
9-4=5
07
03
011
080
7-3=4
09
05
007
060
7-5=2
Dm
00 50
000
050 /0
0-0=0
100
110
7-0=7
3-0=0
4-0=4
Iteration
120 /70
330 /280
005
12
09
9-4=5
07
09
03
011
080
7-3=4
05
007
060
7-5=2
Dm
00 50
00
000
000
---
Demand
70
100
110 /20
280 /190
Iteration
9-7=2
5-3=2
7-4=3
09
07
03 80
09
05
00 50
Demand
Iteration
73
04
20
000
---
030
12-9=3
11
080 /0
7-3=4
07
060
9-5=4
00
00
000
---
70
100 /20
00
170 /90
9-7=2
5-3=2
7-4=3
Step 5:- To begin with, the cost differences betn the pairs of least cost cell are taken for
each row & column. The largest of these being 4 (=9-5), the column designated J is
selected. In the lowest cost cell of this column, DJ, a value 20 assigned and the column J
is deleted. The requirment at row D is revised 20
A
B
05
P A Z A R E
From / To
Step 3:- To begin with, the cost differences betn the pairs of least cost cell are taken for
each row & column. The largest of these being 5 (=9 -4), the column designated 4 is
selected. In the lowest cost cell of this column, BR, a value 20 assigned and the column
R is deleted. The requirment at row B is revised 20
10
Bh
---
J
10
R
05
12
09
04
07
09
03 80
05 20
Dm
00 50
Demand
70
Capacity
90
20
000
Iteration
---
030
12-9=3
11
080
7-3=4
07
060 /40
9-5=4
00
00
000
20 /0
00
90
050
10-5=5
Iteration
004
90
10
Capacity
90
---
---
12
Dm
Iteration
Capacity
/0
090
P A
Bh
P A
P A Z A R E
Bh
N I L E S H
Step 2:- To begin with, the cost differences betn the pairs of least cost cell are taken for
each row & column. The largest of these being 5 (=10-5), the column designated 5 is
selected. In the lowest cost cell of this column, AR, a value 90 assigned and the row A is
deleted. The requirment at column R is revised 90
From / To
From / To
N I L E S H
Demand
Step 4:- To begin with, the cost differences betn the pairs of least cost cell are taken for
each row & column. The largest of these being 4 (=7-3), the column designated J is
selected. In the lowest cost cell of this column, CJ, a value 80 assigned and the row C is
deleted. The requirment at column J is revised 80
Iteration
Capacity
9-4=5
09
12
Bh
050
--/30
From / To
00
000
Iteration
Bh
Total Cost = 10 x 90 + 12 x 50 + 7 x 70 + 3 x 10 + 7 x 60 + 0 x 50
Total Cost = 900 + 600 + 490 + 30 + 420 + 0 = 2440 (in hundred)
Total Cost is 2440 x 100 = Rs. 24400
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
--/70
Second Edition 2013 - 2014
74
J
10
30
D
Dm
09 40
00 50
Demand
70 /30/0
04
03 80
05 20
11
00
07
40 /0
00
00
00
00
70 /30/0
00 /0
From / To
Supply
10
20
70
25
50
35
60
B
C
P A Z A R E
Demand
08
10
09 50
06
05
09 5
08 25
070 /20/5/0
025 /0
04
05
06 30
Demand
50 /0
35 /15/0
60
030 /0
145 /125/75/60/55/30/0
N I L E S H
Total Cost = 4 x 20 + 9 x 50 + 7 x 15 + 9 x 5 + 8 x 25
Total Cost = 80 + 450 + 105 + 45 + 200 = 880
and
and
Penalty = 6 x 30
Penalty = 180
By using the NWC method, The total cost is Rs. 880 and Penalty is Rs. 180
P A Z A R E
First find the least value from whole table and from table the cell A2 value is least value
09
06
04
Demand
50
3
10
9
8
6
60
Supply
20
70
25
40
145
04
10
10
30
/20/10
07
05
05
35
10
09
15
/15/0
Supply
/0
020
60
070
08
025
06
030
60
145
Total Cost = 4 x 20 + 9 x 10 + 9 x 60 + 6 x 10 + 5 x 15
Total Cost = 80 + 90 + 540 + 60 + 75 = 845
and
and
/10/0
/0
/125/95/80/70/60/0
Penalty = 4 x 30
Penalty = 120
By using the LCM method, The total cost is Rs. 845 and Penalty is Rs. 120
74
2
4
7
5
5
35
08
03
20
1
8
9
6
4
50
02
From / To
A
B
C
T
Demand
01
From / To
Since there is not enough supply, some of the demands at the three destinations may not
be satisfied. For the unsatisfied demands let the penalty cost be rupees 4, 5 6 for destinations (1) , (2) and (3) respectively. Find the optimal allocation that the transportation and
penalty costs.
P A
Supply
020 /0
03
04 20
07 15
P A
02
01
N I L E S H
Start to solve the problem by the north west corner i.e. A1 cell
Total Cost = 5 x 90 + 12 x 30 + 4 x 20 + 3 x 80 + 9 x 40 + 5 x 20 + 0 x 50
Total Cost = 450 + 360 + 80 + 240 + 100 + 0 = 1590 (in hundred rupees)
Total Cost is 1590 x 100 = Rs. 159000
07
30
/0
09
00
12
20
05
Capacity
90
---
Bh
This type, student can solve in exam paper. If any doubt or confuse to under-standing the example, then student can see the befores example steps to
understand procedure, how to solve the problem.
From / To
Step 6:- Finally, only one column is left and therefore, no cost differences need to be
recalculated. The allocations for each of the cells remaining are made having reference to
the requirments: 40 to DBh and 30 To BBh
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
75
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
From/To
08
10
020
--
--
09
04 20
07 10
09 60
070
06 20
05 5
08
025
04 30
05
06
030
--
Demand
50
35
60
145
Iteration
--
S1
012
S2
006
S3
009
Demand
200
008
011
50
015
015
/0
250
020
017
/50/0
350
025
250
012
100
007
/100/0
400
400
/0
Supply
/200/0
400
/250/0
300
/400/0
500
1200
Iteration
D4
Supply
D3
200
03
D2
200
02
01
From / To
D1
To begin with, the cost differences bet the pairs of least cost cell are taken for each row &
column. The largest of these being start to solve the problem.
S1
012
008
S2
006
Demand
P A Z A R E
By using the VAM method, The total cost is Rs. 835 and Penalty is Rs. 120
020
150
100
Supply
025
400
/150/0
009
200
/0
011
015
015
017
250
/0
012
100
007
350
400
300
/0
400
/0
500
/100/0
1200
P A
Total Cost = 4 x 20 + 7 x 10 + 9 x 60 + 6 x 20 + 5 x 5
Total Cost = 80 + 70 + 540 + 120 + 25 = 835
P A
S3
Penalty = 4 x 30
Penalty = 120
250
D4
N I L E S H
200
D3
D1
N I L E S H
From/To
P A Z A R E
S1
012
008
020
025
400
S2
006
011
015
012
300
S3
009
015
017
007
500
Demand
200
250
350
400
1200
This type, student can solve in exam paper. If any doubt or confuse to under-standing the example, then student can see the befores example steps to
understand procedure, how to solve the problem.
D4
Supply
Iteration
S1
012
S2
006 100
025
400
12
S3
009 100
017
300
400
007
500
015
--
--
Demand 200
250
350
400
Iteration
--
--
--
--
012
1200
D3
Supply
D2
75
D4
D1
D3
D2
D1
From / To
From/To
76
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
c)
d)
e)
If ther is no row or column with only a single Zero element left, then select a row/
column arbitrarily and choose one of the jobs (or persons) and make the assign-ment. Now cross the remaining zeros in the column and row in respet of which the
assignment is made.
Repeat steps ( a ) through ( c ) until all assignment are made.
Determine the total cost with reference to the original cost table.
I
Ex (1) :- Solve the assignment problem for optimal solution using HAM.
A
10
2
0
8
B
9
3
5
6
C
15
5
2
6
D
8
4
1
7
E
S
Ans:- Step 1 : Row minimization - The minimum value of each row is subtracted from all
elements in the row. It is shown in following table.
Step 3 : Draw the minimum number of horizontal and vertical lines (not the diagonal
ones) that are required to cover all the Zero elements. If the number of lines drawn is
equal to n (the number of rows/columns) the solution is optimal, and proceed to steps 6.
If the number of lines drawn in smaller than n, go to step 4.
D
8-8=0
4-1=3
1-0=1
7-6=1
N I L E S H
P A Z A R E
Worker / Job
1
2
3
4
A
2-0=2
0-0=0
0-0=0
2-0=2
Step 3 :
B
1-0=1
1-0=1
5-0=5
0-0=0
C
7-0=7
3-0=3
2-0=2
0-0=0
D
0-0=0
3-0=3
1-0=1
1-0=1
Job Assignment
Worker / Job
B 02
A 01
A 07
B 0
B0
A 01
A 03
B 03
B0
A 05
A 02
B 01
C 02
B0
B0
C 01
Tip:- 1) First find the single Zero from row, if Zero find in row then cut the column
2) Then find the single Zero from column, if Zero find in column then cut the row
This step repeat till there are Zero not left in given table and optimal solution is satisfied.
In above example table, optimal solution is not satisfied, then Use ABC Analysis.
76
Step 6 : Given the optimal solution, make the job assignment as indicated by the Zero
elements. This is done as follows:
a) Locate a row which contains only one Zero element. Assign the job corresponding
to this element to its corresponding person. Cross out the zeros, if any, in the col-umn corresponding to the element, which is indicative of the fact that the particular
job and person are no more available.
b) Repeat ( a ) for each of such rows which contain only one zero. Similarly, perform
the same operation in respect of each column containing only one Zero element,
crossing out the zero(s), if any, in the row in which the element lies.
C
15-8=7
5-2=3
2-0=2
6-6=0
Step 4 : Select the smallest uncovered (by the lines) cost element. Subtract this element
from all uncovered elements including itself and add this element to each value located at
the intersection of any two lines. The cost elements through which only one line passes
remain unaltered.
B
9-8=1
3-2=1
5-0=5
6-6=0
P A
P A Z A R E
A
10-8=2
2-2=0
0-0=0
8-6=2
Step 2 : Column minimization - The minimum value of each column is subtracted from all
elements in the column. It is shown in following table.
P A
Step 2 : In the reduced cost table obtained, consider each column and locate the smallest element in it. Subtract the smallest value from every other entry in the column. As a
consequence of this action, there would be at least one zero in each of the row and
columns of the second reduced cost table.
Worker / Job
1
2
3
4
N I L E S H
Step 1: Locate the smallest cost element in each row of the cost table. Now subtract this
smallest element from each element in that row. As a result, there shall be at least one
zero in each row of this new table, called the Reduced Cost Table.
It may observed that none of the three working methods discussed earlieer to solve
an assigment is efficient. A method, designed specially to handle the assignment problems in an efficient way called the Hungarian Assignment Method, is available, which is
based on the concepts of opportunity cost. For a typical balanced assignment problem
involving a certain number of person and an equal number of jobs, and with an objective
function of the minimisation type, the method is applied as listed in the following steps:
Worker / Job
1
2
3
4
77
1-1=0
7-1=6
1-1=0
3-1=2
03
5-1=4
2-1=1
01
2+1=3
1+1=2
N I L E S H
Step 3 :
After ABC Analysis, The optimal assignments can be made as the least number of lines
covering all zeros.
P A Z A R E
Cost
08
03
00
06
17
05
11
14
N I L E S H
2
17
21
01
04
03
04
19
01
Tip:- 1) First find the single Zero from row, if Zero find in row then cut the column
2) Then find the single Zero from column, if Zero find in column then cut the row
P A Z A R E
This step repeat till there are Zero not left in given table and optimal solution is satisfied.
In above example table, optimal solution is satisfied. The assignment are made after
scanning the rows and column for unit Zeros. Assignments mad are shown with circle.
( Zmin = 17 )
Ex (2) :- Solve the assignment problem for optimal solution using HAM.
Step 4 :
Jobs
B1
D2
C3
A4
Total =
Cost
40
55
48
41
184
E
77
Worker / Job
A
B
C
D
1
45
40
51
67
2
57
42
63
55
3
49
52
48
64
4
41
45
60
55
Ans:Step 1 : Row minimization - The minimum value of each row is subtracted from all
elements in the row. It is shown in following table.
Assignment are mad in the following order. Rows 1, 3, and 4 contain only one zero each.
So assign 1-B, 3-C and 4-A. Since worker 1 has been assigned job B, we cross the zero
in the second column of the second row. After making these assignment only worker 2 and
job D are left for assignment. The final pattern of assignments is 1-B, 2-D, 3-C and 4-A,
involving a total time of 40 + 55 + 48 + 41 = 184 minutes.
Jobs
D1
B2
A1
C4
Total =
Worker
1
2
3
4
P A
D
27-13=14
13-13=0
16-13=3
14-13=1
Job Assignment
Worker / Job
P A
Step 5 :
C
11-0=11
21-0=21
0-0=0
19-0=19
02
B
0-0=0
0-0=0
4-0=4
4-0=4
A
5-0=5
17-0=17
1-0=1
0-0=0
Worker / Job
1
2
3
4
Worker / Job
D
67-40=27
55-42=13
64-48=16
55-41=14
Step 2 : Column minimization - The minimum value of each column is subtracted from all
elements in the column. It is shown in following table.
Note:- This step 4 means ABC Analysis & Job Assignment is same for all problems for
assigning and after ABC classified & ABC Treament, to draw the reduced cost table.
Here, Key element is 1, after ABC Treatment, the following table appears
C
51-40=11
63-42=21
48-48=0
60-41=19
2) No change in B
B
40-40=0
42-42=0
52-48=4
45-41=4
A
45-40=5
57-40=17
49-48=1
41-41=0
ABC Treatment :-
Worker / Job
1
2
3
4
ABC Classified
A - Uncrossed B- Single Crossed
C-Double Crossed
Key element = minimum key of all A
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
78
Ex (3) :- Using the following cost matrix, determine a) optimal job assignment & b) cost.
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
Step 4 :
2) No change in B
ABC Treatment :-
ABC Classified
C-Double Crossed
4
2-2=0
2-2=0
2-2=0
2-2=0
6-6=0
5
8-2=6
7-2=5
4-2=2
4-2=2
10-6=4
Here, Key element is 2, after ABC Treatment, the following table appears
Machinist / Job
2
1-1=0
5-1=4
3-1=2
3-1=2
4-1=3
3
1-1=0
6-1=5
4-1=3
6-1=5
3-1=2
4
0-0=0
0-0=0
0-0=0
0-0=0
0-0=0
5
6-2=4
5-2=3
2-2=0
2-2=0
4-2=2
P A Z A R E
Step 3 :
0+2=2
4+2=6
06
4-2=2
5-2=3
03
04
2-2=0
3-2=1
2-2=0
5-3=2
02
3-2=1
2-2=0
02
N I L E S H
After ABC Analysis, The optimal assignments can be made as the least number of lines
covering all zeros.
Step 5 :
P A Z A R E
Total Cost Calculation ( takes actual tables values )
C 07
B 0
B 0
C 0
C 04
B 06
A 04
A 05
B 0
B 03
B 04
A 02
A 03
B 0
B 0
B0
A 02
A 05
B 0
B 0
B 02
A 03
A 02
B 0
B 02
( Zmin = 21 )
The total cost associated with the optimal machinist-job assignment is 121.
Cost
02
04
03
09
03
21
Jobs
B4
C5
D1
E3
A2
Total =
Machinist
A
B
C
D
E
7+2=9
Job Assignment
Machinist / Job
P A
1
8-1=7
7-1=6
5-1=4
1-1=0
3-1=2
P A
Machinist / Job
A
B
C
D
E
N I L E S H
Step 2 : Column minimization - The minimum value of each column is subtracted from all
elements in the column. It is shown in following table.
3
3-2=1
8-2=6
6-2=4
8-2=6
9-6=3
2
3-2=1
7-2=5
5-2=3
5-2=3
10-6=4
1
10-2=8
9-2=7
7-2=5
3-2=1
9-6=3
Machinist / Job
A
B
C
D
E
Note:- This step 4 means ABC Analysis & Job Assignment is same for all problems for
assigning and after ABC classified & ABC Treament, to draw the reduced cost table.
Machinist / Job
1
2
3
4
5
A
10
3
3
2
8
B
9
7
8
2
7
C
7
5
6
2
4
D
3
5
8
2
4
E
9
10
9
6
10
Ans:Step 1 : Row minimization - The minimum value of each row is subtracted from all
elements in the row. It is shown in following table.
Ex (4) :- Using the following cost matrix, determine a) optimal job assignment & b) cost.
This step repeat till there are Zero not left in given table and optimal solution is satisfied.
In above example table, optimal solution is not satisfied, then Use ABC Analysis.
78
Person/ Job
J1
J2
J3
J4
J5
P1
P2
P3
P4
27
31
20
22
18
24
17
28
--21
20
20
20
12
--16
21
17
16
27
Tip:- 1) First find the single Zero from row, if Zero find in row then cut the column
2) Then find the single Zero from column, if Zero find in column then cut the row
79
Ans:- Since the number of lines covering all zeros is less than n, we select the lowest
uncovered cell, which equals 2. So, assign the dummy row.
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
P1
9-4=5
---
02
03
P2
19-4=15
12
9-4=5
05
P3
4-4=0
01
4-4=0
---
P4
6-4=2
12
4-4= 0
11
P5
0+4=4
0+4=4
0+4=4
Step 1 : Row minimization - The minimum value of each row is subtracted from all
elements in the row. It is shown in following table.
Person/ Job
J3
27-18=9
31-12=19
20-16=4
22-16=6
0-0=0
18-18=0
24-12=12
17-16=1
28-16=12
0-0=0
J4
--21-12=9
20-16=4
20-16=4
0-0=0
20-18=2
12-12=0
--16-16=0
0-0=0
J5
21-18=3
17-12=5
16-16=0
27-16=11
0-0=0
J2
P1
P2
P3
P4
P 5(Dummy)
J1
J3
J4
J5
J3
J4
J5
B0
A ---
B 02
B 03
P2
A 19
B 12
A 09
B 0
B 05
P3
A 04
B 01
A 04
B ---
B0
P4
A 06
B 12
A 04
B 0
B 11
P A Z A R E
B 0
P5
C0
B 0
C 0
C0
P A Z A R E
Z
A
R
2) No change in B
Note:- This step 4 means ABC Analysis & Job Assignment is same for all problems for
assigning and after ABC classified & ABC Treament, to draw the reduced cost table.
Here, Key element is 4, after ABC Treatment, the following table appears
Ex (1):- A company plans to assign 5 salesman to 5 districts in which it operates. Estimates of sales revenue in thousands of rupees for each salesman in differents districts
are given in the following table. In your opinion. What should be the placement of the
salesmen if the objective is to maximise the expected sales revenue?
Ans:-
79
ABC Treatment :-
ABC Classified
C-Double Crossed
In some situations, the assignment problem may call for maximisation of profit,
revenue, etc. as the objective. For dealing with a maximisation problem, we first change
it into an equivalent minimisation problem. This is achieved by subtracting each of the
elements of the given pay-off matrix from a constant (value) K. Thus, we may simply put a
negative sign before each of the pay-off values (which is equivalent to subtracting each
value from zero). Usually, the largest of all values in the given marix is located and then
each one of the values is subtract from it (the larges value is taken so as to avoid the
apperarance of negative signs). Then the problem is solved the same way as a
minimisation problem is.
Maximisation Case
( Zmin = 66 )
The total cost associated with the optimal Person-job assignment is 66 in the aggregate.
This step repeat till there are Zero not left in given table and optimal solution is satisfied.
Step 4 :
Cost
18
12
16
20
00
66
N I L E S H
Tip:- 1) First find the single Zero from row, if Zero find in row then cut the column
2) Then find the single Zero from column, if Zero find in column then cut the row
In above example table, optimal solution is not satisfied, then Use ABC Analysis.
Jobs
P1J 2
P2J 4
P3J 5
P4J 3
P5J 1
Total =
P A
A 09
P A
P1
N I L E S H
Machinist
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
J2
J1
Job Assignment
Person/ Job
Step 5 :
Step 3 :
After ABC Analysis, The optimal assignments can be made as the least number of lines
covering all zeros.
Step 2 : Column minimization - The minimum value of each column is subtracted from all
elements in the coln. Every Column has one Zero is present So, table is same as above
J2
J1
Person/ Job
D4
D5
40
48
49
30
37
46
32
35
46
41
48
36
41
49
48
36
29
38
44
43
48
44
45
44
47
Note:- When the multi Zeros come in table, then first locate a row/column which
Step 4 :
ABC Treatment :-
D3
1-1=0
13-1=12
8-0=8
0-0=0
1-1=0
D4
13-1=12
20-1=19
11-0=11
5-0=5
6-1=5
D5
1-1=0
5-1=4
4-0=4
5-0=5
2-1=1
P A Z A R E
N I L E S H
Salesmen/District
Job Assignment
D2
D3
D4
D5
B0
B0
B 07
B0
S2
B 0
A 14
A 12
A 14
A 04
S3
B 0
A 12
A 08
A 06
A 04
S4
C 19
B 01
B0
B 0
B 05
S5
C 11
B 05
B0
B 0
B 01
07
00
S2
14-4=10
12-4=8
14-4=10
4-4=0
S3
000
12-4=8
8-4=4
6-4=2
4-4= 0
S4
19+4=23
01
00
05
S5
11+4=15
05
00
01
After ABC Analysis, The optimal assignments can be made as the least number of lines
covering all zeros.
Step 5 :
There are more than one optimal assignments possible in this case because of the
existence of multiple Zeros in different rows and columns. The assignments possible
are:
S1 D 2 , S2 D 1 , S3 D 5 , S4 D 3 , S5 D 4
= 46 + 48 + 45 + 49 + 43 = 231 or
S1 D 2 , S2 D 5 , S3 D 1 , S4 D 3 , S5 D 4
= 46 + 44 + 49 + 49 + 43 = 231 or
S1 D 2 , S2 D 5 , S3 D 1 , S4 D 4 , S5 D 3
= 46 + 44 + 49 + 44 + 48 = 231 or
S1 D 2 , S2 D 1 , S3 D 5 , S4 D 4 , S5 D 3
= 46 + 48 + 45 + 44 + 48 = 231
Each of these assignment patterns would lead to an expected aggregated sales equal to
231 thousand rupees.
80
C 08
00
S1
D1
8+4=12
Salesmen/District
D5
0-0=0
4-0=4
4-0=4
5-0=5
1-0=1
S1
D4
12-5=7
19-5=14
11-5=6
5-5=0
5-5=0
D5
D3
0-0=0
12-0=12
8-0=8
0-0=0
0-0=0
D4
Step 3 :
D2
2-2=0
16-2=14
14-2=12
3-2=1
7-2=5
D3
D1
8-0=8
0-0=0
0-0=0
19-0=19
11-0=11
D2
P A Z A R E
Step 2 : Column minimization - The minimum value of each column is subtracted from all
elements in the column. It is shown in following table.
Salesmen/District
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
D1
P A
D2
3-1=2
17-1=16
14-0=14
3-0=3
8-1=7
P A
D1
9-1=8
1-1=0
0-0=0
19-0=19
12-1=11
Here, Key element is 4, after ABC Treatment, the following table appears
N I L E S H
2) No change in B
Note:- This step 4 means ABC Analysis & Job Assignment is same for all problems for
assigning and after ABC classified & ABC Treament, to draw the reduced cost table.
Step 1 : Row minimization - The minimum value of each row is subtracted from all
elements in the row. It is shown in following table.
Salesmen/District
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
D5
49-48=1
49-44=5
49-45=4
49-44=5
49-47=2
D4
49-36=13
49-29=20
49-38=11
49-44=5
49-43=6
D3
49-48=1
49-36=13
49-41=8
49-49=0
49-48=1
ABC Classified
C-Double Crossed
D2
49-46=3
49-32=17
49-35=14
49-46=3
49-41=8
D1
49-40=9
49-48=1
49-49=0
49-30=19
49-37=12
Ans:- Since, it is a maximisation problem, we would first subtract each of the entries in the
table from the largest one, which equals 49 here. The resultant data are given below.
Salesmen/District
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
contains only one Zero element. There is least element is only Zero present, that
time, locate a row / column which contains two Zero element, cross out the Zero(s).
D3
D2
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
D1
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
80
81
Ex (2) :- Suggest optimal assignment of the four salesmen to the four sale-territories.
Given the estimated sales (in lakhs of rupees) as follows:
Datala
12
16
19
13
Salesmen/Territories
Ghugus
Ballarpur
Datala
Yogesh
02
1-1=0
7-1=6
Nilesh
1-1=0
3-1=2
Mangesh
5-1=4
2-1=1
Dinesh
2+1=3
1+1=2
Datala
20-12=8
20-16=4
20-19=1
20-13=7
After ABC Analysis, The optimal assignments can be made as the least number of lines
covering all zeros.
Step 5 :
Ballarpur
15-8=7
5-2=3
2-0=2
6-6=0
Datala
8-8=0
4-2=2
1-0=1
7-6=1
P A Z A R E
Job Assignment
Salesmen/Territories
Chanda
Ghugus
Ballarpur
Nilesh
B0
A 01
A 03
B 02
Mangesh
B0
A 05
A 02
B 01
Dinesh
C 02
B0
B0
C 01
Salesmen/Territories
Aakash
Nilesh
Naresh
Girish
Naginabag
220-200=20
220-160=60
220-190=30
220-180=40
Jatpura
220-150=70
220-120=100
220-195=25
220-175=45
Tukum
220-170=50
220-150=70
220-190=30
220-160=60
Ghutkala
220-202=0
220-140=80
220-200=20
220-190=30
Step 1 : Row minimization - The minimum value of each row is subtracted from all
elements in the row. It is shown in following table.
2) No change in B
81
ABC Treatment :-
Ghutkala
220
140
200
190
Tukum
170
150
190
160
Ans:- Since, it is a maximisation problem, we would first subtract each of the entries in the
table from the largest one, which equals 220 here. The resultant data are given below.
Tip:- 1) First find the single Zero from row, if Zero find in row then cut the column
2) Then find the single Zero from column, if Zero find in column then cut the row
Step 4 :
Naginabag Jatpura
200
150
160
120
190
195
180
175
B0
P A Z A R E
Salesmen/Territories
Aakash
Nilesh
Naresh
Girish
A 07
( Zmax = 63 )
A 01
B 02
N I L E S H
Ex (3) :- Suggest optimal assignment of the four salesmen to the four sale-territories.
Given the estimated sales (in lakhs of rupees) as follows:
Datala
Yogesh
Cost
12
17
20
14
63
The total cost associated with the optimal Salemen-Territories assignment is 63.
Step 2 : Column minimization - The minimum value of each column is subtracted from all
elements in the column. In all the column has present the Zero, so table same as above.
Step 3 :
Sale Territories
Datala
Ghugs
Chanda
Ballarpur
Total =
P A
Ghugus
9-8=1
3-2=1
5-0=5
6-6=0
P A
Chanda
10-8=2
2-2=0
0-0=0
8-6=2
Salesmen
Yogesh
Nilesh
Mangesh
Dinesh
N I L E S H
Salesmen/Territories
Yogesh
Nilesh
Mangesh
Dinesh
Step 1 : Row minimization - The minimum value of each row is subtracted from all
elements in the row. It is shown in following table.
Ballarpur
20-05=15
20-15=5
20-18=2
20-14=6
Ghugus
20-11=9
20-17=3
20-15=5
20-14=6
Chanda
20-10=10
20-18=2
20-20=0
20-12=8
Salesmen/Territories
Yogesh
Nilesh
Mangesh
Dinesh
Ans:- Since, it is a maximisation problem, we would first subtract each of the entries in the
table from the largest one, which equals 20 here. The resultant data are given below.
Chanda
Ballarpur
05
15
18
14
Ghugus
11
17
15
14
Chanda
10
18
20
12
Here, Key element is 2, after ABC Treatment, the following table appears
Salesmen/Territories
Yogesh
Nilesh
Mangesh
Dinesh
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
Tukum
50-0=50
70-60=10
30-20=10
60-30=30
Ghutkala
0-0=0
80-60=20
20-20=0
30-30=0
Step 5 :
Ghutkala
Cost
220
150
195
180
745
( Zmax = 745 )
The total Total Sales Revenue associated with the optimal Salemen-Territories assignment is 745.
Job Assignment
Jatpura
A 40
B0
N I L E S H
Nilesh
B0
B 35
B0
C 20
Naresh
B 10
B 0
B0
C0
Girish
A 10
A 10
A 20
B0
Note:Ans:-
N I L E S H
P A Z A R E
P A
A 65
A 20
Aakash
P A
P A Z A R E
ABC Treatment :-
ABC Classified
C-Double Crossed
2) No change in B
Naginabag
Salesmen/Territories
Step 4 :
Sale Territories
Ghutkala
Tukum
Jatpura
Naginabag
=
Tukum
Cost
220
160
190
175
745
Ghutkala
0-0=0
20-0=20
0-0=0
0-0=0
Sale Territories
Ghutkala
Naginabag
Jatpura
Tukum
Total =
Tukum
50-10=40
10-10=0
10-10=0
30-10=20
Jatpura
70-5=65
40-5=35
5-5=0
15-5=10
Salesmen
Aakash
Nilesh
Naresh
Girish
Step 3 :
Naginabag
20-0=20
0-0=0
10-0=10
10-0=10
There are more than one optimal assignments possible in this case because of the
existence of multiple Zeros in different rows and columns. However, the problem has an
alternative optimal solution as well. Both of these are given below:
Step 2 : Column minimization - The minimum value of each column is subtracted from all
elements in the column. It is shown in following table.
Salesmen/Territories
Aakash
Nilesh
Naresh
Girish
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
Naginabag
20-0=20
60-60=0
30-20=10
40-30=10
Salesmen/Territories
Aakash
Nilesh
Naresh
Girish
82
Note:- This step 4 means ABC Analysis & Job Assignment is same for all problems for
assigning and after ABC classified & ABC Treament, to draw the reduced cost table.
Salesmen/Territories
20-10=10
65-10=55
40-10=30
Nilesh
35
Naresh
10
Girish
10-10=0
10-10= 0
20+10=30
0+10=10
20-10=10
M1
302
303
304
After ABC Analysis, The optimal assignments can be made as the least number of lines
covering all zeros.
M2
302
304
305
301
M3
303
301
304
305
302
M4
302
305
304
303
M5
301
302
304
Aakash
Ghutkala
Tukum
MANAGER
Jatpura
Naginabag
Here, Key element is 10, after ABC Treatment, the following table appears
Most of the managers did not list all the five rooms sincethey were not satisfied with some
of these rooms and thy have left these from the list. Assuming that their preferences can
be quantified by numbers, find out as to which manger should be assigned to which room
so that total preference ranking is a minimum.
82
Ex (1) :- Welldone Company has taken the third floor of a multi-streyed building for rent
with a view to locate one of their zonal officers. There are five main rooms in tis to be
assigned to five mangers. Each room has its own advantages and disadvantages.
Some have windows, some are closer to the swashrooms or to the canteen or secretarial pool. The rooms are of all different sizes and shapes. Each of the five managers
were asked to rank their room preferences amongst the rooms 301, 302,303,304 and
305. Their preferences were recorded in a table as indicated below:
83
4
1
M
2
3
2
5
1
3
4
M
1
4
3
2
1
2
M
3
M
M4
M5
N I L E S H
301
302
303
304
305
M
1-1=0
2-1=1
3-2=1
M
4-1=3
1-1=0
M
2-2=0
3-2=1
2-1=1
5-1=4
1-1=0
3-2=1
4-2=2
M
1-1=0
4-1=3
3-2=1
2-2=1
1-1=0
2-1=1
M
3-2=1
M
Job Assignment
Rooms / Manager M1
M4
B 03
B 01
C 04
B0
C 01
303
A 01
BM
B0
A 03
BM
304
A 01
B0
B 01
A 01
B 01
B 01
B 02
A 01
BM
Step 4 :
304
1-1=0
305
3-1=2
01
1-1=0
01
01
02
1-1=0
Manager
M5
M1
M3
M2
M4
Total =
Ranking
01
01
01
02
02
07
( Zmin = 07 )
N I L E S H
P A Z A R E
a)
b)
83
Viewing
Hours
1-2 P.M.
2-3 P.M.
3-4 P.M.
4-5 P.M.
Network
A
27.1
18.9
19.2
11.5
B
18.1
15.5
18.5
21.4
C
11.3
17.1
09.9
16.8
D
09.5
10.6
07.7
12.8
ABC Treatment :-
C0
1-1=0
01
Which network should be scheduled each hour to provide the maximum audience
exposure?
How would the schedule change if it is decided not to use network A between 1 and
3 P.M.?
QDM notes for MBA
B0
302
305
B0
303
4+1=5
Ex (2) :- A company has just developed a new item for which it proposes to undertake a
national television promotional compaign. It has decided to schedule a series of oneminute commercials during peak audience viewing hours of 1 to 5 P.M. To reach the
widest possible audience, the company wants to schedule one commercial on each of
the networks and to hae only one commercial appear during each of the four one-hour
time blocks. The exposure ratings for each hour, which represent the number of viewers
per Rs. 10000 spent, are given below:
M5
301
0+1=1
M3
M2
302
P A
P A
P A Z A R E
01
Step 2 : Column minimization - The minimum value of each column is subtracted from all
elements in the column. In all the column has present the Zero, so table same as above.
Step 3 :
03
M3
M2
301
Step 5 :
Rooms / Manager M1
M5
After ABC Analysis, The optimal assignments can be made as the least number of lines
covering all zeros.
Ans:- Step 1 : Row minimization - The minimum value of each row is subtracted from all
elements in the row. It is shown in following table.
M4
How to draw the table, observe the questions data, M1 not assigned 301 room, same M4
also not assigned 301 room, M2 assigned 301 in 4 Rank, same as M3 assigned 2 rank
and M5 assigned 1 rank (See the questions table and understand it)
M3
M5
M2
M4
M
1
2
3
M
M3
301
302
303
304
305
M2
Rooms / Manager M1
Rooms / Manager M1
Here, Key element is 1, after ABC Treatment, the following table appears
In the first step, we formulate the assignment problem using preference ranks. This is in
following table. Notice that the rooms not ranked by a manager are represented by M - as
prohibited assignments.
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
84
Ans:- a) To solve this problem, we first multiply each value in the matrix by 10 to express
exposure ratings per Rs. 1 lakh. It simplifies the calculation work somewhat.
C
11.3x10=113
17.1x10=171
09.9x10=099
16.8x10=168
D
09.5x10=095
10.6x10=106
07.7x10=077
12.8x10=128
D
271-095=176
271-106=165
271-077=194
271-128=143
Here, Key element is 3, after ABC Treatment, the following table appears
D
176-0=176
165-82=83
194-79=115
143-57=86
P A Z A R E
A 0
A 0
3-4 P.M.
C0
B 07
B 75-3=72
B 32-3=29
99
A 93
2-3 P.M.
C0
C 34
B 0
B 0
3-4 P.M.
B0
B 07
A 75
A 32
A 28
A 03
28-3=25
3-3=0
Viewing
Hours
Network
1-2 P.M.
90-7=83
137-7=130
90-7=83
2-3 P.M.
3+7=10
37
3-4 P.M.
7-7=0
72-7=65
29-7=22
4-5 P.M.
99+7=106
25
Network
A
B
C
D
Total =
27.1
18.5
17.1
12.8
75.5
A 140
B 90
B 0
A 34+3=37
After ABC Analysis, The optimal assignments can be made as the least number of lines
covering all zeros.
B0
B 99
B 0+3=3
( Zmax = 75.5 )
84
1-2 P.M.
4-5 P.M.
2-3 P.M.
A D
B 140-3=137 B 93-3=90
Step 5 :
Job Assignment
A
B 90
D
176-83=93
83-83=0
115-83=32
86-83=3
C0
Hours
C
158-18=140
18-18=0
93-18=75
46-18=28
Step 3 :
B
90-0=90
34-0=34
7-0=7
0-0=0
A C
1-2 P.M.
P A Z A R E
Network
A
0-0=0
0-0=0
0-0=0
99-0=99
Network
Above table, optimal solution is not satisfied. So again ABC treament use for covering all
zeros. Now, Here, Key element is 7.
Step 2 : Column minimization - The minimum value of each column is subtracted from all
elements in the column. It is shown in following table.
Viewing
Hours
1-2 P.M.
2-3 P.M.
3-4 P.M.
4-5 P.M.
A B
P A
Network
B
C
090-0=90
158-0=158
116-82=34
100-82=18
86-79=7
172-79=93
57-57=0
103-57=46
B A
4-5 P.M.
P A
A
0-0=0
82-82=0
79-79=0
156-57=99
Viewing
Hours
N I L E S H
Step 1 : Row minimization - The minimum value of each row is subtracted from all
elements in the row. It is shown in following table.
Viewing
Hours
1-2 P.M.
2-3 P.M.
3-4 P.M.
4-5 P.M.
2) No change in B
N I L E S H
C
271-113=158
271-171=100
271-099=172
271-168=103
C-Double Crossed
Note:- This step 4 means ABC Analysis & Job Assignment is same for all problems for
assigning and after ABC classified & ABC Treament, to draw the reduced cost table.
B
271-181=090
271-155=116
271-185=086
271-214=057
ABC Treatment :-
A
271-271=000
271-189=082
271-192=079
271-115=156
Network
Viewing
Hours
1-2 P.M.
2-3 P.M.
3-4 P.M.
4-5 P.M.
ABC Classified
Further, being a maximisation problem, we subtract each value from the largest value to
get the opportunity loss matrix. The result of these steps is given in following table:
B
18.1x10=181
15.5x10=155
18.5x10=185
21.4x10=214
A
27.1x10=271
18.9x10=189
19.2x10=192
11.5x10=115
Step 4 :
Network
Viewing
Hours
1-2 P.M.
2-3 P.M.
3-4 P.M.
4-5 P.M.
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
85
Ans:- b) For the given restriction, the prohibited time slots are replaced by M, when network
1 and 3 P.M. not to be used, then table are as follows:
C
158
100
172
103
D
176
165
194
143
C
158-90=68
100-100=0
172-79=93
103-57=46
D
176-90=86
165-100=65
194-79=115
143-57=86
M
M
0-0=0
99-0=99
B
0-0=0
16-0=16
7-0=7
0-0=0
C
68-0=68
0-0=0
93-0=93
46-0=46
D
86-65=21
65-65=0
115-65=50
86-65=21
P A Z A R E
Step 3 :
Job Assignment
D
B0
A 68
A 21
2-3 P.M.
C 16
B0
B0
3-4 P.M.
B0
B 07
A 93
A 50
4-5 P.M.
B 99
B0
A 46
A 21
68-21=47
21-21=0
2-3 P.M.
16
3-4 P.M.
07
93
50
4-5 P.M.
99
46-21=25
21-21=0
Above table, first we find the only one Zero, but solution not satisfied the optimal solution
then we find two Zeros and satisfied our solution as optimal solution, However, the
problem has an alternative optimal solution as well. Both of these are given below:
Step 5 :
Network
B
C
A
D
Total =
for the ( b ) condition Zmax is 67.2
Network
D
C
A
B
Total =
18.1
17.1
19.2
12.8
67.2
09.5
17.1
19.2
21.4
67.2
N I L E S H
P A Z A R E
Ex (3) :- A firm produces four products. There are four operatiors who are capable of
producing any of these four products. The firm records 8 hors a day and allows 30 minutes
for lunch. The processing time in minutes and the profit for each of the products are given
below:
Operator/Products
1
2
3
4
Profit (Rs) per unit
A
15
10
25
15
8
B
9
6
15
9
6
C
10
9
15
10
5
D
6
6
9
10
4
1-2 P.M.
Hours
1-2 P.M.
P A
Network
A
P A
Viewing
Hours
1-2 P.M.
2-3 P.M.
3-4 P.M.
4-5 P.M.
N I L E S H
Step 2 : Column minimization - The minimum value of each column is subtracted from all
elements in the column. It is shown in following table.
B
90-90=0
116-100=16
86-79=7
57-57=0
A
M
M
79-79=0
156-57=99
Network
Network
Viewing
Hours
1-2 P.M.
2-3 P.M.
3-4 P.M.
4-5 P.M.
Step 1 : Row minimization - The minimum value of each row is subtracted from all
elements in the row. It is shown in following table.
B
090
116
086
057
A
M
M
079
156
Viewing
Hours
Network
Here, Key element is 21, after ABC Treatment, the following table appears
Viewing
Hours
1-2 P.M.
2-3 P.M.
3-4 P.M.
4-5 P.M.
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
Step 4 :
ABC Treatment :-
C-Double Crossed
2) No change in B
85
Ans:- An 8 hour working day, with a 30-minutes lunch time allowed, implies that new
working time available per day is 7 hours 30 minutes, that is 450 minutes.
Total working hours =
8 hrs = 8 x 60 = 480 mint.
Lunch Break
30minutes = - 30 mint.
Actual working time = 450 mint.
The number of units of deifferent products which cold be produced by the four operators
can be calculated by dividing 450 by the given processing times.
ABC Classified
86
With the profit per unit of each product being given, we may calculate the profit resulting
from each possible asignment. The profit matrix is given in following table:
B 06
C 0
B 25
B 0
A 34
B 0
A 150
A 150
B0
C 20
B 0
B 0
A 04
B 0
A 25
A 120
Step 4 :
2) No change in B
To solve the problem, it is first converted into a minimisation problem by obtaining loss
matrix by subtracting each value from 450. The 450 is the highest profit value in the table.
x4=300
(450
6 )
(450
) x4=300
6
x4=200
(450
9 )
(450
) x4=180
10
x5=225
(450
10 )
(450
) x5=250
9
x5=150
(450
15 )
(450
) x5=225
10
x6=300
(450
9 )
(450
) x6=450
6
x6=180
(450
15 )
(450
) x6=300
9
x8=240
(450
15 )
(450
)x8=360
10
x8=144
(450
25 )
(450
)x8=240
15
Operator/Product
Job Assignment
Step 3 :
Optr/Prdct
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
Here, Key element is 4, after ABC Treatment, the following table appears
N I L E S H
Operator/Product
450-250=200 450-300=150
P A Z A R E
Step 1 : Row minimization - The minimum value of each row is subtracted from all
elements in the row. It is shown in following table.
Operator/Product
D
150-150=0
90-0=90
0-0=0
200-0=200
150-0=150
306-250=56
270-250=20
300-250=50
250-250=0
210-150=60
150-150=0
225-150=75
270-150=120
34-4=30
0
4-4=0
25
150-4=146
150-4=146
20-4=16
25-4=21
120-4=116
P A Z A R E
Step 5 :
Product
D
B
C
A
Total
Profit
0300
0450
0150
0240
1140
( Zmax = 1140 )
Operator/Product
Step 2 : Column minimization - The minimum value of each column is subtracted from all
elements in the column. It is shown in following table.
0+4=4
225-150=75
06
150-150=0
210-150=60
After ABC Analysis, The optimal assignments can be made as the least number of lines
covering all zeros.
N I L E S H
3
4
P A
P A
Operator/Product
0-0=0
75-50=25
0-0=0
90-56=34
0-0=0
200-50=150
150-0=150
56--56=0
20-0=20
50-50=0
0-0=0
60-56=4
0-0=0
75-50=25
120-0=120
60-56=6
Ex (4) :- A solicitors firm employs typists on hourly piece-rate basis for their daily work.
These are five typists and their charges and speed are different. According to an earlier
understanding, only one job is given to one typist and the typist is paid for a full hour even
when he works for a fraction of an hour. Find the least cost allocation for the following data:
86
Job
P
Q
R
S
T
No.of Pages
199
175
145
298
178
Step 2 : Column minimization - The minimum value of each column is subtracted from all
elements in the column. It is shown in following table.
Typist/Job
N I L E S H
17x5=85
15x5=75
13x5=65
25x5=125
15x5=75
15x6=90
13x6=78
11x6=66
22x6=132
13x6=78
25x3=75
22x3=66
19x3=57
38x3=114
23x3=69
20x4=80
18x4=72
15x4=60
30x4=120
18x4=72
19x4=76
16x4=64
14x4=56
28x4=112
17x4=68
75-65=10
65-65=0
125-65=60
75-65=10
90-66=24
78-66=12
66-66=0
132-66=66
78-66=12
75-57=18
66-57=09
57-57=0
114-57=57
69-57=12
80-60=20
72-60=12
60-60=0
120-60=60
72-60=12
76-56=20
64-56=08
56-56=0
112-56=56
68-56=12
12-10=2
18-18=0
09-8=1
57-56=1
12-10=2
20-18=2
12-8=4
60-56=4
12-10=2
20-18=2
08-8=0
56-56=0
12-10=2
Job Assignment
P
C 02
B 02
C 0
B 04
B0
B 06
A 04
B 0
A 10
A 02
B0
A 01
B 0
A 01
A 02
B 02
A 04
B 0
A 04
A 02
C 02
B0
C 0
B0
B 02
N I L E S H
ABC Analysis and Job Assignment
P A Z A R E
ABC Classified
ABC Treatment :-
C-Double Crossed
2) No change in B
Here, Key element is 1, after ABC Treatment, the following table appears
Typist/Job
A 2+1=3
A 02
B 0+1=1
A 04
B0
A 06
A 4-1=3
B 0
A 10-1=9
B 2-1=1
B0
B 1-1=0
C 0
B 1-1=0
C 2-1=1
A 02
A 4-1=3
B 0
A 4-1=3
B 2-1=1
B 2+1=3
B0
C 0+1=1
B0
C 02
Above table, optimal solution is not satisfied. So again ABC treament use for covering all
zeros. Now, Here, Key element is 2.
Table on next page
87
85-65=20
66-56=10
12-8=4
24-18=6
Step 4 :
10-10=0
Typist/Job
Step 1 : Row minimization - The minimum value of each row is subtracted from all
elements in the row. It is shown in following table.
Typist/Job
60-56=4
P A
10-8=2
20-18=2
P A
P A Z A R E
Typist/Job
(178
) x5
12
(178
) x6
14
(178
) x3
08
(178
) x4
10
(178
) x4
11
(298
)x5
12
(298
)x6
14
(298
)x3
08
(298
)x4
10
(298
)x4
11
Step 3 :
(145
)x5
12
(145
)x6
14
(145
)x3
08
(145
)x4
10
(145
)x4
11
(175
)x5
12
(175
)x6
14
(175
)x3
08
(175
)x4
10
(175
)x4
11
(199
)x 5
12
(199
)x 6
14
(199
)x 3
08
(199
)x 4
10
(199
)x 4
11
Ans:- Using the given inform, we first obtain the cost matrix, when different jobs are
performed by different typists. The elements of the matrix are obtained as follows. To
illustrate, if typist A is given job P, he would require 199/12 = 16.58 hours and, hence, be
paid for 17 hours @ Rs. 5 per hour. This results in a cost of Rs. 85 for this combination.
Typist/Job
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
Rate/hour (Rs)
5
6
3
4
4
Typist
A
B
C
D
E
87
3-2=1
2-2=0
01
4-2=2
03
9-2=7
01
0+2=2
1+2=3
3-2=1
3-2=1
01
1+2=3
2+2=4
101
102
103
104
Step 5 :
Flight
101
102
103
104
Arrival
7 A.M.
9 A.M.
3 P.M.
9 P.M.
204
Departure
6 P.M.
6 P.M.
6 P.M.
6 P.M.
Time
11 hrs
09 hrs
27 hrs
21 hrs
Flight
101
102
103
104
201
24
22
16
10
202
25
23
17
11
203
06
28
22
16
204
11
09
27
21
N I L E S H
101
102
103
104
P A Z A R E
Time
20 hrs
22 hrs
28 hrs
10 hrs
Arrival
3 P.M.
3 P.M.
3 P.M.
3 P.M.
203
Departure
5 A.M.
7 A.M.
1 P.M.
7 P.M.
Time
14 hrs
16 hrs
22 hrs
28 hrs
Flight
101
102
103
104
Flight
101
102
103
104
Arrival
10 A.M.
10 A.M.
10 A.M.
10 A.M.
202
Departure
5 A.M.
7 A.M.
1 P.M.
7 P.M.
Time
19 hrs
21 hrs
27 hrs
09 hrs
Arrival
8 P.M.
8 P.M.
8 P.M.
8 P.M.
204
Departure
5 A.M.
7 A.M.
1 P.M.
7 P.M.
Time
09 hrs
11 hrs
17 hrs
23 hrs
Flight
101
102
103
104
88
Flight
101
102
103
104
QDM notes for MBA
201
20
22
28
10
202
19
21
27
09
203
14
16
22
28
Now actual table are as follows for Crew at New Delhi ( Table 2 )
201
Departure
5 A.M.
7 A.M.
1 P.M.
7 P.M.
Arrival
9 A.M.
9 A.M.
9 A.M.
9 A.M.
Ex (5) :- An airline, operating seven days a week, has given the following schedule of its
flights between New Delhi and Mumbai. The crews should have a minimum of five hours
between the flights. Obtain the pairing of flights that minimises layouver time away from
home. For any given pairing, the crew will be based at the city that rusults in the smallest
layover.
New Delhi - Mumbai
Mumbai - New Delhi
Flight No.
Departure
Arrival
Flight No.
Departure
Arrival
101
5 A.M.
7 A.M.
201
7 A.M.
09 A.M.
102
7 A.M.
9 A.M.
202
8 A.M.
10 A.M.
103
1 P.M.
3 P.M.
203
1 P.M.
03 P.M.
104
7 P.M.
9 P.M.
204
6 P.M.
08 P.M.
To begin with, we first assume that all the crew is based at New Delhi. Using this
assumption, we can obtain the layover times of various combinations of flights. To illustrate, the flight 101 which starts from New Delhi at 5 A.M. reaches Mumbai at 7 A.M. If it is to
return as 201, the scheduled time for which is 7 A.M., then it can do so only after 24 hours
since a minimum layove time of 5 hours is required. Similarly, layover times for other flight
combinations can be obtained as shown in the table.
Time
06 hrs
28 hrs
22 hrs
16 hrs
Time
25 hrs
23 hrs
17 hrs
11 hrs
P A
P A
P A Z A R E
203
Departure
1 P.M.
1 P.M.
1 P.M.
1 P.M.
202
Departure
8 A.M.
8 A.M.
8 A.M.
8 A.M.
Now actual table are as follows for Crew at New Delhi ( Table 1 )
( Zmin = 399 )
Arrival
7 A.M.
9 A.M.
3 P.M.
9 P.M.
101
102
103
104
Arrival
7 A.M.
9 A.M.
3 P.M.
9 P.M.
N I L E S H
Flight
Cost
75
66
66
80
112
399
Job
T
T
T
T
T
Total
Typist
A
A
A
A
A
Time
24 hrs
22 hrs
16 hrs
10 hrs
101
102
103
104
201
Departure
7 A.M.
7 A.M.
7 A.M.
7 A.M.
Flight
In this case, after covering zeros there are 2 Rows lefts i.e. C & E, so assume alternate
and cross the Zero for satisfied the optimal solution.
The minimum number of lines to cover all zeros equals 5, which matches with the order
of the matrix. Accordingly, assignments have been made as described below:
Arrival
7 A.M.
9 A.M.
3 P.M.
9 P.M.
2-2=0
3-2=1
Flight
6-2=2
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
88
204
09
11
17
23
Second Edition 2013 - 2014
89
Step 4 :
Flight
21 *
16 *
09
103
16
17
22
17 *
104
10
09 *
16
21
40
At
( from
( from
( from
( from
table
table
table
table
N I L E S H
P A
P A Z A R E
P A
N I L E S H
To continue, we can obtain the optimal pairing of flights so as to minimise the total laover
time, using the Hungarian Assignment Method.
Step 1 : Row minimization - The minimum value of each row is subtracted from all
elements in the row. It is shown in following table.
Flight
201
202
203
204
101
20-6=14
19-6=13
6-6=0
9-6=3
P A Z A R E
102
22-9=13
21-9=12
16-9=7
9-9=0
103
16-16=0
17-16=1
22-16=6
17-16=1
104
10-9=1
9-9=0
16-9=7
21-9=12
)
)
)
)
( Zmin = 40 )
1
1
1
2
22
Crew Based
New Delhi
New Delhi
New Delhi
Mumbai
102
Total
Layover Time
06
06
16
09
06
204
09 *
Flight No.
203
204
201
202
202
19 *
203
101
201
20 *
Flight No.
101
102
103
104
Now, since the crew can be based at either of the stations, minimum layover times can be
obtained for different flight combinations y selecting the corresponding by selecting the
corresponding lower value out of the above two tables. for instance, in combining flight
101, we select 20, which is lower of the two values 24 and 20 ( see the both tables), like
that select the lower limits for other flights also. The values are shown in following table:
E-mail :- nilesh_pazare@rediffmail.com
204
101
14
13
03
102
13
12
07
103
01
06
01
104
01
07
12
203
202
201
Flight
Job Assignment
Step 3 :
Step 2 : Column minimization - The minimum value of each column is subtracted from all
elements in the column. In all the column has present the Zero, so table same as above.
With a zero in each column as well, there is no neeed to perform the ABC treatment or
column reductions. Further, the number of lines covring all zeros is equal to the order of
the given matrix, we can obtain the optimal assignment as shown in the table:
89