Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Frequency Response
Robert Stengel, Aircraft Flight Dynamics
MAE 331, 2010
Laplace Transform of
Initial Condition Response
Laplace Transform of
a Dynamic System
Laplace Transform of
a Dynamic System
System equation
dim(!x) = (n " 1)
dim(!u) = (m " 1)
dim(!w) = (s " 1)
"1
Control/Disturbance
Input
4th-Order Initial
Condition Response
$
&
&
&
&
&
%
[ sI ! F ]
!1
Lon
*g
0
0
0
*Dq
*D#
Lq
L#
VN
VN
Mq
M#
L#
VN
'
)$
)&
)&
)&
)&
)&
)%
)(
!V (t) '
)
!" (t) )
,
!q(t) )
)
!# (t) )(
$
&
&
&
&
&%
!V (0) '
)
!" (0) )
given
!q(0) )
)
!# (0) )(
$
!V (s) '
)
&
!" (s) )
*1 &
= [ sI * FLon ] &
!q(s) )
)
&
!# (s) )(
&%
= s 4 + a3 s 3 + a2 s 2 + a1s + a0
Numerator is an (n x n) matrix
nVV (s) n"V (s) nqV (s) n#V (s) '
)
nV" (s) n"" (s) nq" (s) n#" (s) )
)
nVq (s) n"q (s) nqq (s) n#q (s) )
)
nV# (s) nV# (s) nV# (s) nV# (s) )
(
Relationship to State
Transition Matrix
Initial condition response
!x(t) = " ( t, 0 ) !x(0)
Time
Domain
Frequency
Domain
(4 x 4)
Denominator is scalar
$
&
&
Adj ( sI ! FLon ) = &
&
&
&
%
!V (0) '
)
!" (0) )
!q(0) )
)
!# (0) )(
$
&
&
&
&
&%
Therefore,
Typical
(ijth)
!xi (s) = ai1 ( s ) !x1 (0) + ai 2 ( s ) !x1 (0) + ! + ain ( s ) !xn (0) "
element of A(s)
(s
+ an "1s
n "1
+ ... + a1s + a0
ij
dj = s ! "j
) p# ((ss))
i
,
s="j
j = 1, n
A ( s ) ! [ sI ! F ]
Define
aij (s) =
(
(s
pi ( s )
! (s)
qmax
+ ... + b0
!xn (0)
$ d1
d2
dn '
+
+!
!xi (t) = L"1 [ !xi (s)] = L"1 &
( s " #n ) )(i
% ( s " #1 ) ( s " #2 )
H (s) = H x [ sI ! F ]
!1
H Adj ( sI ! F ) G
G= x
sI ! F
( r ! n )( n ! n )( n ! m )
= (r ! m)
First-Order
Transfer Function
Scalar dynamic system
x! ( t ) = fx ( t ) + gu ( t )
y ( t ) = hx ( t )
(n = m = r = 1)
Second-Order
Transfer Function
Longitudinal Transfer
Function Matrix
$ ! f
& = # 11
& #" f21
%
f12 $ ! x1 ( t )
&#
f22 & # x2 ( t )
%"
$ ! g
& + # 11
& #" g21
%
! y (t )
1
y (t ) = #
# y2 ( t )
"
$ ! h
& = # 11
& #" h21
%
h12 $ ! x1 ( t )
&#
h22 & # x2 ( t )
%"
$
&
&
%
g12 $ ! u1 ( t )
&#
f22 & # u2 ( t )
%"
$
&
&
%
!1
" h11
G=$
$# h21
h12
h22
"
adj $
%
$#
'
(
'&
det *
*)
s ! f11
! f12
! f21
s ! f22
s ! f11
! f12
! f21
s ! f22
%
'
'& " g11
$
+ $ g21
#
-,
g12 %
'
f22 '
&
Longitudinal Transfer
Function Matrix
There are 4 outputs and 3 inputs
$ nV (s) nV (s) nV (s) '
!T
!F
)
& !E
& n!" E (s) n!" T (s) n!" F (s) )
)
& q
q
q
& n! E (s) n! T (s) n! F (s) )
)
& #
#
#
&% n! E (s) n! T (s) n! F (s) )(
HLon (s) = 2
s + 2* P+ nP s + + n2P s 2 + 2* SP+ nSP s + + n2SP
)(
Input-output relationship
$
&
&
&
&
&%
!V (s) '
$ !* E(s) '
)
!" (s) )
)
&
= HLon (s) & !* T (s) )
)
!q(s)
& !* F(s) )
)
(
%
!# (s) )(
"
$
$
$
$
#
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
"
%$
'$
'$
'$
'$
&$
#
T* T
L* F / VN
!L* F / VN
+ Lon ( s )
( r ! n )( n ! n )( n ! m )
= (r ! m) = (2 ! 2)
(n = m = r = 2)
H ij (s) =
ij
)
# zeros = q
# poles = n
%
'
'
'
'
'
&
H ij (j! ) =
Dynamic equation
#
Mq
# !q! & %
!!x SP = %
()% +
Lq .
%$ !"! (' % -, 1 * V 0/
N
$
ij
j# (! )
= H x [ sI ! F ]
)(
$
L
L M
$
'
M!E &s + " V # !E " V M )
&
N
N
!E (
%
&
&
' 24
Lq 20 $ VN M ! E *
& # L! E
,+ 1 # V /. # M q ) 5
VN 12 s + & L
N
&
!E
%
( 62
3
%
7 SP ( s )
# k n q (s) &
# +q(s)
(
% q !E
%
% k" n!"E (s) (
+! E(s)
'
$
H SP (s) ! 2
=%
2
%
+" (s)
s + 2) SP* nSP s + * nSP
%
+
%$ ! E(s)
&
(
(
(
(
('
&
(
( !1 E
('
!1
!M "
s+
L"
VN
,
.
.
.
.-
!1
) M/E
+
+ !L/ E
VN
+*
,
)
L
M"
.
+ s+ "V
N
.
+
.
+ #
Lq &
+ %$ 1 ! V (' s ! M q .
N
.+*
G=
Lq &
#
L"
s ! M q s + V ! M" %1 ! V (
$
N
N'
)(
,
.
.
.-
) M/E
+
+ !L/ E
VN
+*
,
.
.
.-
Short-Period Motions
'
)
)
)
)
)
(
Simulator Demonstration of
Short Period Response to Elevator Deflection
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1O7ZqBS0_B8
Dornier Do-128D
VN
)
s ! Mq
+
!1
H SP (s) = H x [ sI ! F ] G = + #
L
&
+ ! %1 ! q V (
N'
+* $
&
# M1E
( # !q & %
( + % *L1 E
(%
( %$ !" (' %
VN
$
'
'
$
L
L M
$
'
M!E s + " V # !E " V )
)
&
N
N(
%&
)
&
& $
Lq - L! E
' )
*
)
& & M!E ,1 #
VN /. #
VN s # M q )( )
+
&% %
(
H SP (s) =
L
$
'
*
L
L
s 2 + #M q + " V s # & M " , 1 # q V / + M q " V )
+
N
N.
N(
%
M"
L"
Rapid damping
Pitch angle and rate response
Flight path angle reoriented by difference
between pitch angle and angle of attack
# !q(s)
# !q(s) & %
!) E(s)
%
(=%
"
(s)
!
"
(s)
!
%$
(' %
!) E(s)
%$
!q(s)
=
!" E(s)
&
(
( !) E(s)
(
('
(
)
Scalar Transfer
Functions for ShortPeriod Approximation
L
L M
%
(
M"E 's + # V $ "E # V M *
k q s $ zq
N
N
"E )
&
= 2
L
s
+
2
1 SP2 nSP s + 2 n2SP
%
(
+
.
L
L
s 2 + $M q + # V s $ ' M # - 1 $ q V 0 + M q # V *
,
N
N/
N)
&
!" (s)
=
!# E(s)
. 35
Lq (
31 + VN M # E %
'& 1 $ V *) $ M q 0 6
VN 23 s + - L
N
k" ( s $ z" )
/ 37
4 , #E
= 2
L
s
+
2
8 SP9 nSP s + 9 n2SP
+
.
%
(
L
L
s 2 + $M q + " V s $ - M " ' 1 $ q V * + M q " V 0
&
N
N)
N/
,
$
L# E
Bode Plot
Short Period
Frequency Response
kq j" $ zq
!q( j" )
=
2
!# E( j" ) $" + 2% SP" nSP j" + " n2SP
= ARq (" ) e
j&q (" )
Angle-of-attack frequency
response
k" ( j# % z" )
!" ( j# )
=
2
!$ E( j# ) %# + 2& SP# nSP j# + # n2SP
= AR" (# ) e j'" (# )
High damping
kq ( j" $ zq )
!q( j" )
j& (" )
=
= ARq (" ) e q
!#E( j" ) $" 2 + 2% SP" n SP j" + " n SP 2
y ( t ) = hu ( t )
# zeros = 1
# poles = 2
20 dB = factor of 10
y ( t ) = h ! u ( t ) dt
H( j! ) = 1
H( j! ) = 10
H( j! ) = 100
Amplitude ratio, AR(dB)
= constant
Phase angle, " (deg) = 0
du ( t )
dt
H( j! ) =
1
j!
10
H( j! ) =
j!
Slope of AR(dB)
= 20 dB/decade
" (deg) = 90
H( j! ) = j!
H( j! ) = 10 j!
Slope of AR(dB)
= +20 dB/decade
" (deg) = +90
100
H( j! ) =
( j! + 10)
100
H( j! ) =
( j! + 100)
When ! = 0, slope = 0
dB/dec
When ! # #, slope = 20
dB/dec
When ! = 0, " = 0
When ! = #, " =45
When " -> ", " -> 90
Effect of
Damping Ratio
H red ( j! ) =
( j! )
H green ( j! ) =
10 2
H green ( j! ) =
2
( j! ) + 2(0.1)(10)( j! ) + 10 2
H blue ( j! ) =
H red ( j! ) =
10 2
( j! ) + 2(0.4)(10)( j! ) + 10 2
2
( j! )
10 2
+ 2(0.707)(10)( j! ) + 10 2
H blue ( j! ) =
10 2
( j! )
( j! )
+ 2 ( 0.1) (10 ) ( j! ) + 10 2
10 3
+ 2 ( 0.1) (10 ) ( j! ) + 10 2
100 2
AR asymptotes of a
pair of complex poles
When ! = 0, slope
= 0 dB/dec
When ! # !n,
slope = 40
dB/dec
When ! = 0, " = 0
When ! = !n, " =90
When " -> ", " ->
180
Height of resonant
peak depends on
damping ratio
Abruptness of phase
shift depends on
damping ratio
Frequency
Response AR
Departures in the
Vicinity of Poles
Difference between
actual amplitude ratio
(dB) and asymptote =
departure (dB)
Results for multiple
roots are additive
from McRuer, Ashkenas,
and Graham, Aircraft
Dynamics and Automatic
Control, Princeton
University Press, 1973
Zero departures have
opposite sign
Phase Angle
Variations in the
Vicinity of Poles
Results for multiple
roots are additive
from McRuer, Ashkenas,
and Graham, Aircraft
Dynamics and Automatic
Control, Princeton
University Press, 1973
LHP zero variations have
opposite sign
RHP zeros have same
sign
Next Time:
Configuration and Power Effects
on Flight Stability
Supplementary
Material
H red ( j! ) =
H blue ( j! ) =
10
( j! + 10)
100 2
( j! )
+ 2(0.1)(100)( j! ) + 100 2
H (j! ) =
H ( j! ) = ( j! + 10 )
# zeros = 0
# poles = 4
[( j! )
+ 2(0.1)(100)( j! ) + 100 2
H ( j! ) = " ( j! " 10 )
Single zero in right half
plane
Introduces a +20 dB/dec
slope
Produces phase lag in
vicinity of zero
Complex pair of
zeros produces an
amplitude ratio
notch at its
natural frequency
[( j! )
[( j! )
+ 2(0.1)(10)( j! ) + 10 2
+ 2(0.05)(1)( j! ) + 12
][( j! )
+ 2(0.1)(100)( j! ) + 100 2
Elevator-toNormal-Velocity
Frequency
Response
) (
0 dB/dec
0 dB/dec
+40 dB/dec
(n q) = 1
Complex zero
almost (but
not quite)
cancels
phugoid
response
40 dB/dec
Phugoid
Short
Period
20 dB/dec