Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2013
R Padmaja, 2013
ISSN 2319-345X www.ijmrbs.com
Vol. 2, No. 2, April 2013
2013 IJMRBS. All Rights Reserved
A mutual fund is a type of professionally-managed collective investment vehicle that pools money
from many investors to purchase securities. As there is no legal definition of mutual fund, the
term is frequently applied only to those collective investments that are regulated, available to the
general public and open-ended in nature. Mutual funds have both advantages and disadvantages
compared to direct investing in individual securities. Today they play an important role in household
finances. So the present study aims at consumer behavior towards mutual funds with special
reference to ICICI Prudential Mutual Funds Limited, Vijayawada. Data was collected through
primary and secondary sources. Primary data was collected through structured questionnaire.
Convenience sampling method was used to collect the data and entire study was conducted in
Vijayawada City. The study explains about investors awareness towards mutual funds, investor
perceptions, their preferences and the extent of satisfaction towards mutual funds. Some
suggestions were also made to increase the awareness towards mutual funds and measures
to select appropriate mutual funds to maximize the returns.
Keywords: Mutual funds, Customer perception, Consumer behavior
INTRODUCTION
Department of Business Management, Krishna University, Machilipatnam-521 001, Krishna District, AP.
R Padmaja, 2013
R Padmaja, 2013
LIMITATIONS
1. Sample size was limited to 100 because of
limited time which is small to represent the
whole population.
2. The research was limited to Vijayawada city
only and if the same research would have been
carried in another city, the results may vary.
OBJECTIVES
1. To know about the extent of awareness about
mutual funds with special reference to ICICI
Prudential Mutual Funds, Vijayawada.
METHODOLOGY
R Padmaja, 2013
Number of Respondents
Percentage
1.
25
25
2.
1,00,001/-to 2,00,000/-
65
65
3.
2,00,001/- to 3,00,000/-
10
10
4.
00
00
Total
100
Table 2: Classification of Mutual Funds Basing on the Awareness Towards Mutual Funds
S. No.
Aware/Not Aware
Number of Respondents
Percentage
1.
Yes
76
76
2.
No
24
24
Total
100
100
Investment
Number of Respondents
Percentage
1.
Yes
68
68
2.
No
32
32
100
100
Total
R Padmaja, 2013
Table 4: Classification of Respondents Basing on Their Interest to get Deduction from Tax
S. No.
Interest
Number of Respondents
Percentage
1.
Yes
89
89
2.
No
11
11
Total
100
100
Investment
Number of Respondents
Percentage
1.
Yes
76
76
2.
No
24
24
100
100
Total
Investment
Percentage
1.
Equity market
20
20
2.
Mutual fund
54
54
3.
Government bond
00
00
4.
Real estate
09
09
5.
Bank FD
48
48
6.
Post office
26
26
7.
Insurance
45
45
202
202
Total
Note:
Number of Respondents
Table 7: Classification of Respondents Basing on the Purpose they Invested in Mutual Funds
S. No.
Investment Purpose
Number of Respondents
Percentage
1.
High return
20
20
2.
Tax benefit
18
18
3.
Saving
45
45
4.
Wealth creation
10
10
5.
Risk diversification
100
100
Total
R Padmaja, 2013
Number of respondents
Percentage
1.
<5
03
03
2.
5-10
65
65
3.
10-15
20
20
4.
15-20
07
07
5.
>20
05
05
Total
100
100
Investment preference
Number of respondents
Percentage
1.
Equity fund
65
65
2.
Debt fund
11
11
3.
Balanced fund
24
24
100
100
Total
Table 10: Preference for the SIP Tax Plan of Various Companies
(Where 1 Point is For Most Preferred and 6 For Least Preferred)
S. No.
Number of Points
Percentage
1.
545
26.0
2.
198
09.4
3.
498
23.7
4.
275
13.1
5.
345
16.4
6.
239
11.4
2100
100.0
Total
R Padmaja, 2013
Table 11: Preference for the Period of Investment of Systematic Investment Plan (SIP)
for your tax Saving (Where 1 is for Most Preferred and 4 is for Least Preferred)
S. No.
Number of points
Percentage
1.
Three year
316
31.6
2.
Five year
286
28.6
3.
Six year
275
27.5
4.
Seven year
123
12.3
Total
1000
100.0
Table 12: Preference for Benefits Offered Among Various AMC Tax Plan
of Mutual Funds (Where 1 is for Most Preferred and 5 is Least Preferred)
S. No.
Investment Benefits
Number of Points
Percentage
1.
Flexibility to investors
256
17.1
2.
Capital appreciation
323
21.5
3.
387
25.8
4.
Wealth maximization
389
25.9
5.
145
09.7
1500
100.0
Total
R Padmaja, 2013
Investment Preference
Number of Respondents
Percentage
1.
Most preferred
12
12
2.
Favorably preferred
16
16
3.
Preferred
44
44
4.
Least preferred
11
11
5.
Not preferred
17
17
100
100
Total
Table 14: Age Wise Classification of Respondents Basing on Their Preference of Investment
S. No.
Service Class
20-30
30-40
40-50
50-60
> 65
Total
1.
Equity Market
12
2.
Mutual Fund
12
22
3.
Govt. Bonds
04
4.
Real Estate
01
5.
Bank F.D.
04
6.
Post office
01
7.
Life Ins.
06
Total
25
20
50
Business Class
20-30
30-40
40-50
50-60
> 65
Total
Equity Market
Mutual Fund
Govt. Bonds
Real Estate
Bank F.D.
Post office
Life Ins.
17
22
Total
R Padmaja, 2013
Professional
20-30
30-40
40-50
50-60
> 65
Total
1.
Equity Market
2.
Mutual Fund
3.
Govt. Bonds
4.
Real Estate
5.
Bank F.D.
6.
Post office
7.
Life Ins.
Total
20
Retired
20-30
30-40
40-50
50-60
>65
Total
1.
Equity Market
2.
Mutual Fund
3.
Govt. Bonds
4.
Real Estate
5.
Bank F.D.
6.
Post office
7.
Life Ins.
Total
but investors between the age of 20-30 and 3040 years mostly prefer to invest in Mutual Fund.
From the Table 19, it is observed that investor
whose income is between 100001/- to 200000/- highly
prefer to invest in tax saving plan of Mutual Fund.
Attribute
20-30
30-40
40-50
50-60
> 65
Total
1.
Yes
18
36
15
76
2.
No
15
24
Total
20
37
16
10
17
100
R Padmaja, 2013
>100,000
100001-200000
200001-300000
Total
1.
Yes
19
42
68
2.
No
23
32
Total
25
65
10
100
Service Class
Business Class
Professional
Retired
Total
1.
Equity Fund
35
11
17
02
65
2.
Debt Fund
01
07
01
02
11
3.
Balanced Fund
14
04
02
04
24
Total
50
22
20
100
Service Class
Business Class
Professional
Retired
Total
1.
Most Preferred
12
2.
Favorably Preferred
16
3.
Preferred
32
44
4.
Least Preferred
11
5.
Not Preferred
17
50
22
20
100
Total
SUGGESTIONS
R Padmaja, 2013
CONCLUSION
mutual funds.
the investors.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
4.
5.
6.
R Padmaja, 2013
7.