Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
1. General presentation
In addition to forecasting techniques, a number of other quantitative techniques are available for use in
planning.
Generally, the modern industrial production imposes programming (planning), meaning the time and space
considered for each worker of complex, non-repetitive projects, made up of many distinct activities, in a complex
interdependence.
Methods used:
graphical methods: simple, used in the case of a small number of activities - Gantt method
mathematical methods from the domain of operational research, more powerful, used in the case of
complex projects that impose the automatic processing of data:
CPM method (Critical Path Method)
PERT method (Program Evaluation and Review Technique)
Gantt and PERT:
Activity name
Symbol
Previous activities
Duration
days
Technological design
10
Mechanical designing
B, C
15
Components execution
E, F
29
21
G, H
3. PERT Method
3.1. Basics
PERT is a network model used to plan and coordinate large-scale projects. As the figure shows, the
PERT network basically consists of circles (events)
indicating the beginning and ending of an activity, and
arrows indicating the activities themselves. The
activities are arranged sequentially form left to right.
The activity is a specific task that is part of the
project and requires time and resources for completion.
The activity symbol, used in a graph, is an arrow,
oriented to the right.
A
D
0
E
1
4
F
G
3
Graph example
- 1, 2,..., 4 events
- A, B,..., H activities
Slacks
The normal slack between the events i and j, Rt(i, j), represents the extra time that an activity or event can be held up
without delaying the project completion. The following relation is used:
Rt (i, j) t*j (t i dij )
(2.3)
Free-float of an activity between the i and j moments, Rl(i, j), is a slack that represents the time with which an activity can
be delayed without affecting the earliest start time of an immediately following activity. The following relation is used:
Rl (i, j) (t i dij )max (t i dij )
(2.4)
(2.6)
Activity deadlines
beginning
end
(2)
(3)
Activity
duration
Beginning
Activity
slacks
End
min
max
min
max
normal
free
dij
ti
tj*-dij
ti+dij
tj*
Rt
Rl
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
in columns (1)-(4) are written down the information from the graph;
in column (5) the computations results ti, taking into account the i events from the column (2) are registered;
in column number (8) the results tj* taking in account the j events from column (3) are registered;
column (7) = column (5) + column (4);
column (6) = column (8) - column (4);
column (9) = column (8) - column (7);
the values from the column (10) are computed using the data from column (7), taking into account the j events from the
column (3).
The activities that are presented on the critical path are called critical activities and have no time slacks.
Activitys duration
The variable duration of each activity from a project can be characterised by the following features:
they are in the interval [a,b], having the limits:
a - the minimum duration of an activity, encountered when all the factors are favourable, in normal general
conditions; it is called optimistic duration;
b - maximum duration of an activity, encountered when all the factors are not favourable, excluding normal calamities
(earthquakes, etc.); it is called pessimistic duration;
it exists a most probable duration, m;
the probabilistic distribution is nearly a regular one, asymmetric of type, like in the figure 2.5.
mean duration for an activity considered to take place between i and j events:
d ij
a 4m b
6
(2.8)
ij2
probbility
In case of this type of distribution, on the basis of the three mentioned values,
one may compute:
(2.9)
b duration
Deviation is a measure of the risk factor in estimating the activity duration; the larger the deviation is, the greater the risk factor
becomes, regarding the real duration.
ij
(i , j )criticalpath
T2
2
ij
(i ,j )criticalpath
(2.10)
(2.11)
meaning that the total medium duration of a project is the sum of the medium duration of each critical activity, and the deviation
represents the sum of the critical activities deviations.
The PERT method allows the computation of the probability of accomplishing the project in a specified amount of time, if
a plan duration is imposed Tp; (TTp).
Considering the hypothesis of a normal distribution of the total duration of a project, T, often present in practice, one may
compute the probability index:
Z
Tp T
T2
(2.12)
One may determine the probability index in a percentage form by using the table from the appendices of this application.
P(T Tp ) P(Z)
(2.13)
Project re-evaluation
For same projects T>Tp. In this particular case, one has to reduce the execution total duration and this can be done by
applying technical or organisational measures.
Examples of organisational measures:
execution of successive works in simultaneously, if the technology allows it and there are physical possibilities;
redistribution of resources to decrease the duration of same activities, especially of the critical activities;
elimination of non-productive periods by introducing work on shifts, II and III or during the non-working days.
Examples of technical measures:
the increase of the mechanisation/automation degree of works;
modification of technologies.
In the case of resources distribution the check of free floats of activities is of a great importance. Actually, the
redistribution of resources is initially done from activities with free floats to critical activities that are simultaneously performed
and posses almost the same content.
Anyway, a rigorous computation must be done, because, in such situations, same non - critical activities may become
critical. We have to emphasise that the reduction of execution duration of same activities generally leads to increase in cost. That
is why the best variant is to be identified that corresponds to a minimum increase of the project cost.
probability
P (Tp >T)
Graphical representation
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
Probability factor
-3
-2
-1
3
Z
Table
Z
0,0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1,0
1,1
1,2
1,3
1,4
1,5
1,6
1,7
1,8
1,9
2,0
2,1
2,2
2,3
2,4
2,5
3,0
Probability (%)
50,0
54,0
57,9
61,8
65,5
69,2
72,6
75,8
78,8
81,6
84,1
86,4
88,5
90,3
91,9
93,3
94,5
95,5
96,4
97,1
97,7
98,2
98,6
98,9
99,2
99,4
99,9
Z
-0,0
-0,1
-0,2
-0,3
-0,4
-0,5
-0,6
-0,7
-0,8
-0,9
-1,0
-1,1
-1,2
-1,3
-1,4
-1,5
-1,6
-1,7
-1,8
-1,9
-2,0
-2,1
-2,2
-2,3
-2,4
-2,5
-3,0
Probability (%)
50,0
46,0
42,1
38,2
34,5
30,9
27,4
24,2
21,2
18,4
15,9
13,6
11,3
9,7
8,1
6,7
5,5
4,5
3,6
2,9
2,3
1,8
1,4
1,1
0,8
0,6
0,1