Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Charismatic Leadership
Participative Leadership
Situational Leadership
Transactional Leadership
Transformational leadership
Servant Leadership
The following discussion shall address each of this type of leadership in greater
details.
CHARISMATIC LEADERSHIP
belief; people follow others they personally admire. The Charismatic Leader
gathers followers through dint of personality and charm, rather than any form of
external power or authority. A Charismatic Leader is WORKING the room as they
move from person to person. They pay much attention to the person they are
talking to at any one moment, making that person feel like they are. They pay a
great deal of attention in scanning and reading the environment, and are good at
picking up the moods and concerns of both individuals and larger audiences,
then will hone their actions and words to suit the situation. The also use a wide
range of methods to manage their image and, if they are not naturally
charismatic, may practice assiduously at developing their skills. Leaders of this
type may engender trust through visible self-sacrifice and taking personal risks in
the name of their belief, show great confidence in their followers, very
persuasive and very effective use of body language as well as verbal language.
Many politicians use a charismatic style, as they need to gather a large number
of followers. Religious leaders too may well use charismatic as do cult leaders.
Charismatic leaders, who are building a group, whether it is a political party, a
cult or a BUSINESS team, will often focus strongly on making the group very clear
and distinct, separating it from other groups. They will then build the image of
the group, in particular in the mind of their followers, as being far superior to all
others. They will tend to attach themselves firmly to the identity of the group,
such that to join the group is to become one with the leader. They create an
unchallengeable position for themselves.
The Charismatic Leader and the Transformational Leader can have many
similarities. The Transformational leader may well be charismatic. Their
difference is in their basic focus. Whereas the Transformational Leader has a
basic focus of transforming the organization and, quite possibly, their followers,
the Charismatic Leader may not want to change anything.
PARTICIPATIVE LEADERSHIP
SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP
The best action of the leader depends on a range of situational factors. When
decision is needed, an effective leader does not just fall into a single preferred
style, such as using transactional or transformational methods. In practice,
things are not that simple. Factors that affect situational decisions include
motivation and capability of followers. This is affected by factors within the
particular situation. The relationships between followers and leader may be
another factor that affects leader behavior as much as it does follower behavior.
The leaders perception of the follower and the situational will affect what they
do rather than the truth of the situation. The leaders perception of themselves
and other factors such as stress and mood will also modify the leaders behavior.
Tannenbaum and Schmidt (1958) identified three forces that led to the leaders
action: the forces in the situation, the forces in the follower and also the forces in
the leader. This recognizes that the leaders style is highly variable, and even
such distant events as a family argument can lead to the displacement activity of
a more aggressive stance in an argument than usual. Maier (1963) noted that
leaders not only consider the likelihood of a follower accepting a suggestion, but
also the overall importance of getting things done. Thus in critical situations, a
leader is more likely to be directive in style simply because of the implications of
failure.
TRANSACTIONAL LEADERSHIP
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
of discussions. The important factor is the leader buys into it, hook, line and
sinker. They developed the vision, selling the vision, finding the way forwards,
and leading the charge. Transformational leadership is about implementing new
ideas, continually change themselves, they stay flexible and adaptable, and
continually improved those around them. Transformational Leaders are often
charismatic, but are not as narcissistic, as pure Charismatic Leaders, who
succeed through a believe in themselves rather than a believe in others.
Transformational Leaders seek to transform. When the organization does not
need transforming and people are happy as they are, then such a leader will be
frustrated.
Servant leader is a leader who serves others needs while strengthening the
organization. The actions of a leader speak louder than his or her words. People
are motivated when you give them credit rather than take it yourself. Ego and
aggression are neither necessary nor constructive. The approach of quiet leaders
is the antithesis of the classic charismatic and often transformational leaders in
that they base their success not on ego and force of character but on their
thoughts and actions. Although they are strongly task-focused, they neither
bullies nor unnecessarily unkind and may persuade people through rational
argument and a form of benevolent Transactional.
To some extent, the emphasis on the quiet leader is a reaction against the
lauding (praise someone/something) of charismatic leaders. Being quiet, of
course, is not the secret of the UNIVERSE, and leaders still need to see the way
forwards. Their job can be harder when they are faced with people of more
external character. For people accustomed to an extraverted charismatic style, a
quiet leader style can be very confusing and they may downplay (make
something less important) the person, which is usually a mistake. Successful
quiet leaders often play the values card to persuade others, showing selfishness
and lack of emotional control as being unworthy characteristics.
SERVANT LEADERSHIP
The leader has responsibility for the followers. Leaders have a responsibility
towards society and those who are disadvantaged. People who want to help
others best to do this by leading them. The servant leader serves others, rather
than others serving the leader. Serving others thus comes by helping them to
achieve and improve. There are two criteria of servant leadership: the people
served grow as individuals, becoming healthier, wiser, more autonomous and
more likely themselves to become servants (Greenleaf, 1977), and the extent to
which the leadership BENEFITS those who are least advantaged in society or at
least does not disadvantage them.
Servant leadership is very moral position, putting the well-being of the followers
before other goals. Servant leadership is a natural model for working in the
public sector. Servant leadership aligns closely with religious morals and has
been adopted by several Christian organizations.
In defining the best leader, it is indeed a mere subjective interpretation. The best
leader would normally challenge the process- they challenge conventional beliefs
and practices and they create change; inspire a share vision- they appeal to
peoples values and motivate them to care about an important mission; enable
others to act- they give people access to information and give them the power to
perform to their full potential; model the way- they dont just tell people what to
do, they are living examples of the ideas they believe in; encourage the heartthey show appreciation, provide rewards, and use various approaches to
motivate people in positive ways.
Leadership by example
A leader is simply someone who has the courage to set the example. Leaderrs
are constantly under watch, nothing that he does or say will escape the scrutiny
and examination of his followers. His activities and attitudes will be the example
he may have set for them. As a leader, setting the example comes first. As
leader, one is accountable for every thing he does. Everything he does must be
transparent and display fairness to all. Every leader should always display
gratitude. It is necessary for leader to cultivate the habit of being grateful for
every good thing that comes into his life. The leader must show his grateful to
his mentors, family, the company he represents and all those who have helped
him. When he is grateful, the leader is actually setting an example for his team
to follow.
Inevitably, some strong example of leadership that we could see are those who
were not actually in the management arena. Some of the prominent leaders be it
We shall divide the cases in three areas; leader of nations, leader of profound
and successful corporation and lastly we will touch on women leadership and
some good and relevant examples where women have led great organizations.
Leader of Nations.
When we talk about achievement of the country during his 23-year period of
administration, Malaysia was some how at her peak of its economic success
despite the two major recession periods that it successfully went through. During
his time, mega infrastructure and buildings including the Petronas Twin Tower
and the magnificent Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) were put in place
and these among others have become the land mark of the country.
Nelson Mendela is also recognized as one great leader of the world. He was
imprisoned by the government for more than twenty years and he joined the
politic and ruled Africa for more than twenty years. Taking from the fact that he
was once being imprisoned, the bitter experience had made him better leader for
the country. Indonesia for another example the most Muslim populous nation at
one time had BJ Habibie who is an aircraft engineer to be its President.
The company also spends one billion of dollars per year in training activities and
the top management make it a practice to lead, motivate, change its people.
According to J Welsh, former CEO and President of GE, mission was critical to
drive the business though to get it understood and implemented at all levels can
be a challenge. The management took it to everybody at almost all possible
opportunities; lunch, workshop at even at the water cooler discussion. Its mission
was to become the most competitive enterprise in the world by becoming no 1 or
no 2 in the market from all aspects.
These have clearly shown to us that in order to lead and manage an organization
what more GE as our example, the senior management right up to the CEO must
acquire and possess the management and leadership skills. Notably, Immelt with
his mathematical background coupled with vast experience and exposure has led
GE successfully.
Carlos Ghosn has been named as one great leader in the automotive industry
where he was the first non-Japanese CEO ever appointed to head the Japanbased car manufacturer NISSAN. He has been practicing a skillful leadership and
very motivational. He had once said, the only and important function of a CEO is
to motivate, the rest is just nonsense.
The rising star of the aviation captain of AIR ASIA Datuk Tony Fernandez has set
one relevant example of a non-technical person to head an almost engineering
based industry involving high risks. Datuk Tony used to be making his name in
the music industry as the head of Warner Music at one time. The appointment to
head the aviation low fare business at first has invited skeptics amongst
industrial players. He managed to prove them wrong as what we can see today
the steep rivalry between Air Asia and the national air carrier Malaysian Airlines
System is believed to have been initiated by Air Asia.
As the head of an oil & gas based organization with more than twenty thousand
employees around the globe, Tan Sri Hassan Marican as a charted accountant
shall be another fair example where it does not necessarily require a technical
person to head a technical organization. Indeed he is backed up by sound
engineering and capable technical personnel in his administration.
Women leadership
At the present era, many nations are placing great importance to women
leadership. In certain countries like Malaysia, it has a dedicated ministry of
women affairs that among others is to take charge of women affairs. It also has a
number of agencies in support of the ministrys functions and responsibilities.
Department of Women Affairs, Persatuan Ibu Tunggal for instance is an NGO
which has been receiving support from the ministry in its social programs under
the administration of the agency.
We would like to take another example of another nation that has attempted to
place women as its leader to rule the country. The country New Zealand is
presently under the administration of HE Helen Clark. She has led the leading
political party of the Labor Party as its chairman and became the Prime Minister
for nine (9) years.
The women movement which is led by the organization called NZ Labor Women
Council has been able to penetrate the interest of the women in the country. It
has managed to place four women ministers in the government cabinet.
However, to a certain extent, the anti-feminism was prevailing and that the idea
of maintaining this situation will start to evade.
The recent widely covered of the removal of Fiorina as the MD of Hewlett Packard
was believed to be due to her inability to address technical issues. Being a non-IT
by training, the mega merger between HP and Compaq has costed her position
as the head of HP. Indeed, she was given huge publicity insofar as her
tremendous way of managing and leading the giant HP, yet her last moves
especially towards the merger did not work out well to her expectation.
In his recent book entitled Mind Set, John Naisbitt (author of best seller
Megatrend) has authored his latest views as well known futurist. He remarked
that the rising giant of China. The great leaders of china has somehow turned the
one-time manufacturing mere 13,000 cars per year back in 1979 has now
produced more than 5 millions of cars from 120 car makers.
But five new factors have emerged have as clearly more important in the future:
Thinking globally. Leaders need to understand the economic, culture, legal, and
political ramifications. Leaders need to see themselves as citizens of the world
with an expanded field of vision and values. Learn how to manage global
environment to achieve competitive advantage. Leaders who can make
globalization work in their favor will have a huge competitive advantage.
Previous examples of the world leaders have clearly shown to us that this factor
on the ability to think across the globe has been crucial especially when the
business organizations or nations as the case may be were to venture into
international transactions. The leaders may need to set aside his or her origin or
background in order to lead globally.
Most high-potential future leaders see the value of these new competencies and
are willing to have their performance measured by them. Future leaders may be
recruited to help mentor present leaders. If future leaders have the wisdom to
learn new competencies from future leaders, they can SHAREleadership in a way
that benefits the organization.
CONCLUSION
The present style of leadership has changed almost significantly across the
globe. Leaders; from being a leader of a small unit up to leading a nation can be
created. Rising needs and awareness amongst the present leaders and
prospective leaders towards a multi skill and capability has been evidenced
throughout this paper discussions.