Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Especially thick walled parts and/or parts with defects are of interest
thermal shocks, the use of a sharp transition in the fluid which leads
Switzerland
because either fluid mixing occurs, or the heat exchange with walls
occurs.
Especially in pipes of a certain length, this heat exchange with the
pressure boundary attenuates the shock front and yields a more
favorable gradual temperature change in the fluid and in the adjacent
Abstract
benefits in the effects of this heat exchange in long pipes for the
exchange between the fluid and the pipe wall along the length,
yielding a much more favorable temperature-time function than, for
example,the sudden shock at the entrance of the pipe leg.
The paper shows the numerical procedures necessary to assess this
phenomenon accurately with time-history integration. It shows
computational solutions for the effect of this attenuation as a function
of the relevant parameters. Results are given in the form of resulting
benefit in wall stress range reduction. The paper also shows the ranges
of relevant parameters which yield such benefits to fatigue reduction
as well as the limits of usefulness in consideration of this effect.
Finally, an example of an actual application in a nuclear power plant
is given.
Introduction
The original approach, which was used when fatigue usage was
across the pipe cross section and therefore with very little longitudinal
calculated as a design basis for most nuclear power plants, was the
wall this does not apply, because the radial gradient has to be retained,
and the temperature field of the pipe wall must be treated two-
The Attenuation of Thermal Shock Fronts by Flow Through Long Pipes- Benefits and Limits | 533
x with a part of the wall and the interior fluid plug. The pipe wall
the integration over the time step t, for all locations x, starting with
x=0, an implicit scheme is used for the wall equations based on (2)
and an explicit scheme for the fluid based on (3). Thus there is no
upstream thermal effect, which corresponds to physical behavior.
An EXCEL-based interactive program SHOCK was written to
compute the described algorithm for sets of input data for wall and
fluid. Input data comprise the geometry of the pipe, which comprises
of two length sections with different properties, the fluid properties
including the mass flow rate, and the film coefficient h. The inlet
temperature of the fluid can be defined as a piece-wise linear function
of time. Output, i.e. fluid temperature, is possible as a function of
time at various locations along the pipe length or as a function of pipe
length at various time points. This program was used to perform the
x).
Eulerian fixed grid for the wall with a Lagrangian moving grid for
the fluid. In order to prevent numerical mixing of the shock front by
interpolation in the longitudinal direction, the integration time step
t is chosen such, that the fluid travels exactly the distance x in this
time, thus :
Pipe:
Pipe OD
0.1 m
Pipe length
30 m
# of pipe segments
45
wall density
0.01 m
7850 kg/m3
45 W/m/K
Fluid:
Heat flow in the wall is radially only, because the longitudinal heat
2 kg/s
density
1000 kg/s
flow in the pipe wall can be neglected for practical purposes. Thus, the
specific heat
4200 J/kg/K
film coefficient
3000 W/m2/K
(2)
20C
200C
For the fluid temperature Tf , the heat balance can be written in finite
form with the film coefficient h and the inner wall radius ri (while
neglecting the longitudinal heat conduction and mixing for turbulent
flows) as follows :
(3)
533 | The Attenuation of Thermal Shock Fronts by Flow Through Long Pipes- Benefits and Limits
The Attenuation of Thermal Shock Fronts by Flow Through Long Pipes- Benefits and Limits | 533
Value 1
Value 2
Value 3
Pipe Size
2 inches
4 inches
8 inches
60.3
114.3
219.1
Pipe Schedule
10 S
80 S
0.2
2.0
ferritic
austenitic
45
17
Table 4.1 Parameters and case values for perfect shock evaluations
The perfect shocks are applied to end parts which have a thickness of
3 times the wall thickness given in table 4.1. The film coefficient h is
calculated with the following formula for pipe flow :
(4)
The water properties are taken at 100C and the thermal shock is a
unit step from 0 to 100C.
Definition : The shock efficiency SE is defined here as the ratio of
the maximum temperature difference between the inner fiber and
the wall average to the unit shock step change in %. The maximum
temperature difference between the inner fiber and the wall average is
a measure for the thermal stress caused by the shock in the wall. Thus
for SE :
From figures 4.1 and 4.2 it can be seen by the efficiencies that large
thermal stresses by radial temperature gradients are only generated
at the higher water velocities. This is because the film coefficients
become comparatively low at low velocities. Moreover, higher
efficiencies.
Therefore, the cases with a water velocity of 2 m/s and schedule 80 S
are investigated first for the attenuation effect in the following section.
Parametric study for shock efficiency of attenuated thermal
shocks
For the most severe conditions from the last chapter, the shock
efficiencies are calculated for the attenuating effect of a pipe with the
program SHOCK. Again, an end part with triple thickness of the pipe
is assumed and the results are given as a function of pipe length.
533 | The Attenuation of Thermal Shock Fronts by Flow Through Long Pipes- Benefits and Limits
Figure 5.1: Shock efficiencies for attenuated shocks for ferritic material
Figure 5.2: Shock efficiencies for attenuated shocks for austenitic material
The Attenuation of Thermal Shock Fronts by Flow Through Long Pipes- Benefits and Limits | 533
end of the pipe which increases the film coefficient there Figure 5.4
It can be seen from the figures that the strongest effect is present for
the smallest pipe diameter.
In addition, it is interesting to know the effect of the water velocity on
the efficiency. Figure 5.3 shows this effect for various water velocities
for austenitic material.
shows the efficiencies for the same conditions in Figure 5.3, but for
cases where there is a triple film coefficient at the end part.
It can be seen, that the shock efficiencies decrease markedly as a
function of pipe length in the case of a constriction or smaller pipe
size at the end.
Figure 5.3: Shock efficiencies for attenuated shocks for austenitic material and pipe size 8
Figure 5.4: Shock efficiencies for attenuated shocks for austenitic material and pipe size 8 with triple film coefficient at end part
2002 CCI. All rights reserved.
533 | The Attenuation of Thermal Shock Fronts by Flow Through Long Pipes- Benefits and Limits
from 200C to 20C. After this, the hot plug from the vessel is coming
piping. The piping consists of a 8 pipe for the main line and 3 pipe
purposes. Four pipes after the 4 pumps act as minimal flow return
for the minimum flow return line. Therefore, the film coefficient in
lines and lead into a common pipe which leads back to the feedwater
the second piping portion and at the vessel nozzle is much larger, and
vessel. The nozzle of this return line thus experiences weekly thermal
Length 29 m
velocity
0.1 m/s
Length 23.5 m
velocity
0.66 m/s
Water properties :
temperature 200C
mass flow rate 3.0 kg/s
Piping properties :
initial temperature 20C
conductivity 42 W/m/K
The input data for this case in SHOCK the program are :
The following two graphs show the evolution of the fluid temperatures as a function of time and of pipe length, respectively.
It can be seen that the transient at the vessel nozzle is attenuated strongly by the heat exchange between the long pipe portions and the water.
Thus, the fatigue usage factor could be reduced significantly to show an acceptable situation at the feedwater vessel return nozzle.
The Attenuation of Thermal Shock Fronts by Flow Through Long Pipes- Benefits and Limits | 533
Figure 6.1: Temperatures as a function of time for emergency feedwater return line
Figure 6.2: Temperatures as a function of length for emergency feedwater return line
533 | The Attenuation of Thermal Shock Fronts by Flow Through Long Pipes- Benefits and Limits
Conclusions
Large pipe diameters and short pipe lengths are not recommended
to investigate this attenuation effect. The graphs presented in this
paper give guidance to decide whether a relevant benefit can be
expected.
10
The Attenuation of Thermal Shock Fronts by Flow Through Long Pipes- Benefits and Limits | 533