Sie sind auf Seite 1von 5

YIJOM-1518; No of Pages 5

Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2009; xxx: xxx–xxx


doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2009.01.011, available online at http://www.sciencedirect.com

Clinical Paper
Head and Neck Oncology

M. Shiiba*, M. Takei, M. Nakatsuru,


Clinical observations of H. Bukawa, H. Yokoe, K. Uzawa,
H. Tanzawa

postoperative delirium after Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery,


Chiba University Hospital, Chiba University,
1-8-1 Inohana, Chiba city, Chiba 260-8677,
Japan

surgery for oral carcinoma


M. Shiiba*M. Takei, M. Nakatsuru, H. Bukawa, H. Yokoe, K. Uzawa, H. Tanzawa:
Clinical observations of postoperative delirium after surgery for oral carcinoma. Int.
J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2009; xxx: xxx–xxx. # 2009 International Association of
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Abstract. The aim of the present study was to clarify the clinical characteristics of
postoperative delirium and to determine appropriate postoperative management for
its prevention. The authors analysed 132 cases of primary surgery for oral
carcinoma and observed 24 (18%) cases of postoperative delirium. Univariate
analysis revealed that significant risk factors for postoperative delirium were older
age, male gender, extensive surgery and morphine pain control. Logistic regression
analysis showed that older age and male gender were significant risk factors for
postoperative delirium, while patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl was
effective for prevention of postoperative delirium. There was a trend for
postoperative delirium to be associated with extensive surgery. In those who had
delirium, blood tests revealed that alkaline phosphatase, total protein, sodium,
chlorine, red blood cell count, haemoglobin and haematocrit were significantly Keywords: delirium; oral carcinoma; patient-
diminished after surgery. These results indicate that general condition is closely controlled analgesia; fentanyl.
related to the onset of postoperative delirium, and suggest that appropriate
postoperative management can reduce the incidence of this complication. Accepted for publication 21 January 2009

Postoperative delirium is a major compli- morbidity1,3,4,14,15. Postoperative delirium practical approaches that can contribute to
cation that usually develops in the acute has been reported in many types of surgery its prevention.
postoperative period (usually within hours and its incidence varies6,8,12,17. According
to a few days) after comparatively exten- to previous studies concerning head and
sive surgical procedures2. The condition is neck operations, the incidence of post- Materials and methods
characterised by a disturbance of con- operative delirium was 17–26%, and risk
Subjects
sciousness accompanied by a change in factors were age, anaesthesia, massive hae-
cognition. Most delirious patients recover morrhage7, stage, flap reconstruction, The authors retrospectively analysed 132
rapidly, but delirium can cause problems operative time, blood transfusion, infusion, cases of oral carcinoma. All patients
during postoperative management. minor tranquiliser use16, living alone, underwent primary surgery under general
Much research has aimed to clarify the white blood cell count, ASA class and anaesthesia between January 2001 and
risk factors for postoperative delirium; anaesthesia time14. The present study September 2006.
however, the details of postoperative delir- aimed to clarify the clinical characteristics Patients were diagnosed with post-
ium remain unclear due to its complex of postoperative delirium and to investigate operative delirium when symptoms corre-

0901-5027/000001+05 $30.00/0 # 2009 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Please cite this article in press as: M.. Shiiba, et al., Clinical observations of postoperative delirium after surgery for oral carcinoma, Int
J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2009), doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2009.01.011
YIJOM-1518; No of Pages 5

2 Shiiba et al.

sponded to one of the criteria outlined in and the onset of postoperative delirium. for postoperative delirium (Table 2).
the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Preoperative blood tests were performed There was a non-significant trend towards
Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) within 5 days of surgery and postoperative longer operative duration, longer anaes-
definition2: disturbance of consciousness tests on the day after surgery. thetic duration and greater blood loss in
(i.e. reduced clarity of awareness of the patients who developed delirium com-
environment) with reduced ability to pared with those who did not. Surgical
focus, sustain or shift attention; a change Statistical analysis procedure was strongly correlated with
in cognition (such as memory deficit, dis- All statistical analyses were performed operative duration (correlation analysis;
orientation or language disturbance) or the using SPSS statistical software (Chicago, correlation coefficient: 0.525) and anaes-
development of a perceptual disturbance IL, USA). Statistical categorical data were thetic duration (correlation analysis; cor-
that is not better accounted for by a pre- analysed with Fisher’s exact test. Compar- relation coefficient: 0.506). These data
existing, established, or evolving demen- isons of continuous quantitative variables suggest that postoperative delirium tends
tia; the disturbance develops during a short were performed with Student’s t-test or to be associated with extensive surgery.
period of time (usually hours to days) and Mann–Whitney U-test. The independent
tends to fluctuate during the course of the association of significant factors deter- Multivariate analyses
day; there is evidence from the history, mined by the univariate analyses was
physical examination or laboratory find- examined using stepwise regression ana- Stepwise regression analysis was per-
ings that the disturbance is caused by the lysis and logistic regression analysis. P formed to determine risk factors for post-
direct physiological consequences of a values less than 0.05 were considered operative delirium. Age, gender and
general medical condition. significant. postoperative pain control were found to
be crucial factors. These three factors were
subjected to logistic regression analysis to
Factors for postoperative delirium Results clarify the association between them and
The authors analysed the following vari- Incidence of postoperative delirium the development of postoperative delir-
ables: age, gender, history of respiratory ium. The results showed older age (logis-
disease and BMI (preoperative factors); A total of 132 patients who underwent tic regression analysis; OR: 1.097, 95%CI:
surgical procedure, anaesthesia time, primary surgery for oral carcinoma were 1.037–1.159) and male gender to be sig-
operation time, blood loss and volume studied. Patient profiles are summarised in nificant risk factors for postoperative
of transfusion fluid (intraoperative fac- Table 1 and no significant gender-related delirium (logistic regression analysis;
tors); and tracheotomy, postoperative differences were observed. Postoperative OR: 5.486, 95%CI: 1.582–19.017), while
management in the intensive care unit delirium occurred in 24 (18%) of 132 pain control with fentanyl-PCA was effec-
(ICU) and pain control management (post- patients. tive for preventing postoperative delirium
operative factors). Surgical procedure was (logistic regression analysis; OR: 0.220,
classified into three categories: tumour 95%CI: 0.070–0.694) (Table 3).
Risk factors revealed by univariate
resection; tumour resection and neck dis-
analyses
section; and tumour resection, neck dis-
Analysis of laboratory data after/before
section and immediate reconstruction. Univariate analyses revealed that older
surgery
Postoperative pain was treated with age (Student’s t-test; p = 0.0023), male
patient-controlled analgesia with either gender (Fisher’s exact test; p = 0.0237), Analysis of blood tests revealed that alka-
morphine hydrochloride (PCA-morphine) more extensive surgical procedure (Fish- line phosphatase (ALP; Mann–Whitney
or fentanyl citrate (PCA-fentanyl). er’s exact test; p = 0.0072) and postopera- U-test; p = 0.0072), total protein (TP;
Laboratory data were analysed to clarify tive pain control with morphine (Fisher’s Mann–Whitney U-test; p = 0.0112),
the association between general condition exact test; p = 0.0225) were risk factors sodium (Na; Mann–Whitney U-test;
Table 1. Patient profiles.
Total (n = 132) Female (n = 55) Male (n = 77)
Age (years meanSD) 63.0  12.6 63.1  14.6 63.0  11.0
BMI (kg/m2; meanSD) 22.5  3.6 23.1  4.1 22.1  3.8
Respiratory disease 24 10 14
Surgical procedure
Tumour resection 6 4 2
Tumour resection + ND* 18 10 8
Tumour resection + ND + R** 108 41 67
Operative duration (min; mean  SD) 472.8  134.3 458.5  143.8 485.7  124.2
Anaesthetic duration (min; mean  SD) 564.2  134.1 552.0  145.9 576.4  121.7
Blood loss (g; median) 518.0 498.0 519.0
Volume of transfusion fluid (ml; mean  SD) 3458.1  660.4 3327.0  673.6 3577.3  656.6
Pain control
PCA-morphine 69 30 39
PCA-fentanyl 63 25 38
Postoperative management in ICU 11 4 7
Tracheotomy 28 11 17
* ND: neck dissection.
** R: immediate reconstruction.

Please cite this article in press as: M.. Shiiba, et al., Clinical observations of postoperative delirium after surgery for oral carcinoma, Int
J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2009), doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2009.01.011
YIJOM-1518; No of Pages 5

Clinical observations of postoperative delirium after surgery for oral carcinoma 3

Table 2. Association between risk factors and postoperative delirium.


Not delirious n = 108 (81.8%) Delirious n = 24 (18.2%) P value
Age (mean  SD) 61.2  12.6 69.7  8.9 0.0023 *1
Gender: male 58 (53.7%) 19 (79.2%) 0.0237 *2
BMI (kg/m2; mean  SD) 22.3  3.5 22.5  3.9 0.8473 *1
Respiratory disease 21 (19.4%) 3 (12.5%) 0.7044 *2

Surgical procedure
Tumour resection alone or with ND 24 (22.2%) 0 (0.0%) 0.0072 *2
Tumour resection + ND + R 84 (77.8%) 24 (100%)
Operative duration (min; mean  SD) 466.5  134.4 506.9  122.7 0.1934 *1
Anaesthetic duration (min; mean  SD) 558.8  137.3 597.1  105.5 0.2144 *1
Blood loss (g; median) 511.5 561.0 0.3424 *3
Volume of transfusion fluid (ml; mean  SD) 3407.5  686.5 3620.0  608.9 0.5438 *1

Pain control
PCA-morphine 51 (47.2%) 18 (75.0%) 0.0225 *2
PCA-fentanyl 57 (52.8%) 6 (25.0%)
Postoperative management in ICU 8 (7.4%) 3 (12.5%) 0.4580 *2
Tracheotomy 21 (19.4%) 7 (28.0%) 0.2838 *2
*1 Student’s t-test.
*2 Fisher’s exact test.
*3 Mann–Whitney U-test.

Table 3. Logistic regression analysis for postoperative delirium.


95% CI
Factor Coefficient P value Odds ratio
Lower Upper
4 6
Constant 8.128 0.0001 2.9  10 4.8  10 0.018
Age 0.092 0.0011 1.097 1.037 1.159
Gender: Male 1.702 0.0073 5.486 1.582 19.017
Pain control: Fentanyl 1.514 0.0098 0.220 0.070 0.694

p = 0.0386), chlorine (Cl; Mann–Whitney delirium, whereas previous studies have operative pain9; however, the present data
U-test; p = 0.0053), red blood cell count shown only a trend in this direction. No showed no suppression of postoperative
(RBC; Mann–Whitney U-test; reports have shown female gender to be a delirium in the PCA-morphine group. This
p = 0.0104), haemoglobin (HGB; Mann– risk factor for postoperative delirium, so it might be due to the complications of
Whitney U-test; p = 0.0139), haematocrit is reasonable to suggest that male gender morphine: confusion, delirium and cogni-
(HCT; Mann–Whitney U-test; p = 0.0078) could be a risk factor for delirium after tive impairment. In contrast, the PCA-
were significantly diminished after sur- surgery for oral carcinoma. This risk fac- fentanyl group had a significant advantage
gery (Table 4). TP, RBC, HGB and tor might have been revealed in the present in avoiding postoperative delirium com-
HCT were significantly correlated (corre- study owing to adequate numbers of sub- pared with the PCA-morphine group. HER-
5
lation analysis; correlation coefficient: jects. RICK et al. investigated the safety and
>0.6) and were also correlated with blood In agreement with previous studies, the cognitive impact of PCA with fentanyl
loss (correlation analysis; correlation present study indicated a significantly compared with morphine among elderly
coefficient: >0.4). These results indicate higher incidence of postoperative delirium postoperative patients following hip or
that general condition is closely related to in elderly patients10,12,13. The authors knee arthroplasty. They reported that fen-
the onset of postoperative delirium, and speculate that elderly patients are less able tanyl produced less postoperative cogni-
that alterations of general condition might to adapt physically and psychologically to tive depression compared with morphine.
be mainly due to blood loss. drastic alterations during the surgical per- These findings suggest that PCA-fentanyl
iod than younger patients, and that this is preferable to morphine in the manage-
might induce postoperative delirium. This ment of postoperative pain, as it is less
Discussion
is likely to be closely related to the higher likely to lead to postoperative delirium.
The incidence of postoperative delirium incidence of postoperative delirium in Previous studies have indicated that inap-
was 18% in the present study; this is extensive operations. propriate pain control or sleep cycle dis-
similar to previous reports describing an The data revealed a statistically signifi- turbance contribute to delirium onset;
incidence of 17–26% in patients under- cant association between postoperative accordingly PCA-fentanyl might have
going resections of malignant head and pain management with morphine and the played a critical role in both pain control
neck tumours7,14,16. The present study incidence of postoperative delirium. PCA and sleep cycle11.
showed a significant gender-related differ- is widely used because of its safety and Analysis of blood tests showed close
ence in the incidence of postoperative efficacy in the management of acute post- association between general condition and

Please cite this article in press as: M.. Shiiba, et al., Clinical observations of postoperative delirium after surgery for oral carcinoma, Int
J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2009), doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2009.01.011
YIJOM-1518; No of Pages 5

4 Shiiba et al.

Table 4. Comparison of laboratory data after/before surgery (%) between patients with and without delirium.
Ratio of laboratory data after/before surgery (%)
P value*
Not delirious (mean  SD) Delirious (mean  SD)
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 120.3  42.6 119.9  41.3 0.7697
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 90.9  41.7 79.7  26.2 0.1191
Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) 91.7  16.9 88.2  16.5 0.2731
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) 75.4  14.8 69.1  11.3 0.0072**
Total protein (TP) 79.3  9.2 75.9  7.9 0.0112**
Albumin (ALB) 78.0  9.1 76.5  8.5 0.2941
Uric acid (UA) 73.3  16.4 74.7  19.4 0.5417
Urea nitrogen (UN) 82.3  28.6 81.3  24.1 0.9066
Creatinine (Cre) 93.7  20.3 95.5  17.0 0.2990
Total bilirubin (T-Bil) 146.5  50.6 146.0  52.7 0.9147
Sodium (Na) 97.4  2.6 98.2  2.1 0.0386**
Potassium (K) 93.2  11.5 90.2  7.7 0.0717
Chlorine (Cl) 98.1  3.4 99.5  3.2 0.0053**
White blood cell count (WBC) 221.8  70.7 201.1  43.7 0.1162
Red blood cell count (RBC) 87.5  11.8 83.8  10.8 0.0104**
Haemoglobin (HGB) 88.3  12.0 84.4  11.0 0.0139**
Haematocrit (HCT) 88.3  11.7 83.3  10.5 0.0078**
Mean corpuscular volume (MCV) 99.9  1.9 99.4  1.3 0.1871
Mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH) 100.9  3.0 100.7  2.4 0.8260
Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC) 101.0  2.4 101.2  2.4 0.6918
Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) 101.5  7.0 100.6  5.7 0.7758
Platelet (PLT) 85.7  36.8 82.1  14.3 0.4907
Platelet crit (PCT) 86.8  12.0 82.6  11.0 0.4878
Mean platelet volume (MPV) 100.7  5.4 100.5  4.9 0.6178
Platelet distribution width (PDW) 100.4  3.0 100.1  2.7 0.8295
*P values were calculated with Mann–Whitney U-test.
**Statistically significant difference.

postoperative delirium. Among the chan- 3. Benoit AG, Campbell BI, Tanner 8. Merchant RA, Lui KL, Ismail NH,
ged laboratory data, TP, RBC, HGB and JR, Staley JD, Wallbridge HR, Wong HP, Sitoh YY. The relationship
HCT appeared to be correlated with blood Biehl DR, Bradley BD, Louridas between postoperative complications
loss, suggesting that blood loss is a crucial G, Guzman RP, Fromm RA. Risk fac- and outcomes after hip fracture surgery.
tors and prevalence of perioperative Ann Acad Med Singapore 2005: 34: 163–
risk factor for postoperative delirium. cognitive dysfunction in abdominal 168.
In conclusion, the present study aneurysm patients. J Vasc Surg 2005: 9. Owen H, Mather LE, Rowley K. The
strongly indicates that age and gender 42: 884–890. development and clinical use of patient-
are significant risk factors for postopera- 4. Bohner H, Hummel TC, Habel U, controlled analgesia. Anaesth Intensive
tive delirium, and that delirium tends to Miller C, Reinbott S, Yang Q, Gab- Care 1988: 16: 437–447.
develop in parallel with increased surgical riel A, Friedrichs R, Muller EE, 10. Santos FS, Velasco IT, Fraguas Jr R.
stress. Postoperative pain control with Ohmann C, Sandmann W, Schneider Risk factors for delirium in the elderly
fentanyl using a PCA system had an F. Predicting delirium after vascular sur- after coronary artery bypass graft sur-
advantage in prevention of postoperative gery: a model based on pre- and intrao- gery. Int Psychogeriatr 2004: 16: 175–
perative data. Ann Surg 2003: 238: 149– 193.
delirium. Accordingly, surgeons should
156. 11. Sveinsson IS. Postoperative psychosis
take these risk factors into consideration 5. Herrick IA, Ganapathy S, Komar W, after heart surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc
and pay closer attention to managing the Kirkby J, Moote CA, Dobkowski W, Surg 1975: 70: 717–726.
patient’s condition throughout the peri- Eliasziw M. Postoperative cognitive 12. van der Mast RC, van den Broek
operative period. impairment in the elderly. Choice of WW, Fekkes D, Pepplinkhuizen L,
patient-controlled analgesia opioid. Habbema JD. Incidence of and preopera-
References Anaesthesia 1996: 51: 356–360. tive predictors for delirium after cardiac
6. Kazmierski J, Kowman M, Banach M, surgery. J Psychosom Res 1999: 46: 479–
1. Aldemir M, Ozen S, Kara IH, Sir A, Pawelczyk T, Okonski P, Iwaszkie- 483.
Bac B. Predisposing factors for delirium wicz A, Zaslonka J, Sobow T, Klos- 13. Vaurio LE, Sands LP, Wang Y, Mul-
in the surgical intensive care unit. Crit zewska I. Preoperative predictors of len EA, Leung JM. Postoperative delir-
Care 2001: 5: 265–270. delirium after cardiac surgery: a prelimin- ium: the importance of pain and pain
2. American Psychiatric Association. ary study. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2006: 28: management. Anesth Analg 2006: 102:
Delirium, dementia, and amnestic and 536–538. 1267–1273.
other cognitive disorders. In: Diganostic 7. Kunimatsu T, Misaki T, Hirose N, 14. Weed HG, Lutman CV, Young DC,
and statistical manual of mental disor- Tsuboi E, Takahashi I, Ohki H, Oi Y, Schuller DE. Preoperative identifica-
ders (DSM-IV-TR). Arlington: Ameri- Matsumoto M, Tanaka H. Postopera- tion of patients at risk for delirium after
can Psychiatric Association Press, tive mental disorder following prolonged major head and neck cancer surgery. Lar-
1994: 135. oral surgery. J Oral Sci 2004: 46: 71–74. yngoscope 1995: 105: 1066–1068.

Please cite this article in press as: M.. Shiiba, et al., Clinical observations of postoperative delirium after surgery for oral carcinoma, Int
J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2009), doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2009.01.011
YIJOM-1518; No of Pages 5

Clinical observations of postoperative delirium after surgery for oral carcinoma 5

15. Williams-Russo P, Urquhart BL, cancer surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Address:
Sharrock NE, Charlson ME. Post- 2005: 34: 33–36. Masashi Shiiba
operative delirium: predictors and prog- 17. Zakriya KJ, Christmas C, Wenz Sr JF, 1-8-1 Inohana
nosis in elderly orthopedic patients. J Am Franckowiak S, Anderson R, Sieber Chiba city
Geriatr Soc 1992: 40: 759–767. FE. Preoperative factors associated with Chiba 260-8677
16. Yamagata K, Onizawa K, Yusa H, postoperative change in confusion assess- Japan
Wakatsuki T, Yanagawa T, Yoshida ment method score in hip fracture Tel:/Fax: +81 43 226 2300.
H. Risk factors for postoperative delirium patients. Anesth Analg 2002: 94: 1628– E-mail: m.shiiba@faculty.chiba-u.jp
in patients undergoing head and neck 1632 table of contents.

Please cite this article in press as: M.. Shiiba, et al., Clinical observations of postoperative delirium after surgery for oral carcinoma, Int
J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2009), doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2009.01.011

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen