Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Author(s):
Guillermo Estivill-Torrus,
Article title:
Chronic Immobilization in the malpar1 Knockout Mice Increases Oxidative Stress in the
Hippocampus
693998
1) Query sheet
2) Article proofs
Article no:
Enclosures:
Dear Author,
Please check these proofs carefully. It is the responsibility of the corresponding author to check against the original
manuscript and approve or amend these proofs. A second proof is not normally provided. Informa Healthcare cannot
be held responsible for uncorrected errors, even if introduced during the composition process. The journal reserves
the right to charge for excessive author alterations, or for changes requested after the proofing stage has concluded.
The following queries have arisen during the editing of your manuscript and are marked in the margins of the proofs.
Unless advised otherwise, submit all corrections using the CATS online correction form. Once you have added all
your corrections, please ensure you press the Submit All Corrections button.
AQ1
Please review the table of contributors below and confirm that last names are structured correctly and that
the authors are listed in the correct order of contributions.
Contrib. No.
Given name(s)
Surname
Mara
Garca-Fernandez
Estela
Castilla-Ortega
Carmen
Pedraza
Eduardo
Blanco
Isaac
Hurtado-Guerrero
Miguel Angel
Barbancho
Jerold
Chun
Fernando
Rodrguez-de-Fonseca
Guillermo
Estivill-Torrus
10
Nu nez
AQ2.
AQ3.
AQ4.
AQ5.
Au: Please provide the location (City and State names) for Randox.
Au: Please provide the location (City and State names) for Sigma-Aldrich.
Au: Please provide the location (City and State names) for Bio-Rad Laboratories.
Au: Please spell out ROS.
Suffix
3
4
10
15
20
25
Department of Molecular Biology, Dorris Neuroscience Center, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, Californea, USA
A B STRA CT
The lysophosphatidic acid LPA1 receptor has recently been involved in the adaptation of the hippocampus to
chronic stress. The absence of LPA1 receptor aggravates the chronic stress-induced impairment of both hippocampal neurogenesis and apoptosis that were accompanied with hippocampus-dependent memory deficits.
Apoptotic death and neurogenesis in the hippocampus are regulated by oxidative stress. In the present work,
we studied the involvement of LPA1 receptor signaling pathway in the regulation of the hippocampal redox after
chronic stress. To this end, we used malpar1 knockout (KO) and wild-type mice assigned to either chronic stress
(21 days of restraint, 3 h/day) or control conditions. Lipid peroxidation, the activity of the antioxidant enzymes
catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GPX), as well as mitochondrial function
stimulation, monitored through the activity of cytochrome c oxidase (COX), were studied in the hippocampus.
Our results showed that chronic immobilization stress enhanced lipid peroxidation as well as the activity of the
antioxidant enzymes studied (CAT, SOD, and GPX). This effect was only observed in absence of LPA1 receptor.
Furthermore, only malpar1 KO mice submitted to chronic stress exhibited a severe downregulation of the COX
activity, suggesting the presence of mitochondrial damage. Altogether, these results suggest that malpar1 KO
mice display enhanced oxidative stress in the hippocampus after chronic stress. This may be involved in the
hippocampal abnormalities observed in this genotype after chronic immobilization, including memory, neurogenesis, and apoptosis.
KEYWORDS: LPA receptors, lysophosphatidic acid, predictable chronic stress
INTRODUCTION
Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA, 1-acyl-2-sn-glycerol-3phosphate) is a simple, bioactive phospholipid involved
in several biological activities that can act as an extracellular signal through, at least, 6 G-protein coupled receptors (LPA16 ) [13]. The LPA1 receptor has been linked
to the proliferation, migration, survival, and apoptosis
of the neural progenitor cells during brain development
[48]. This receptor is expressed in hippocampal progenitors and it is involved in their differentiation [9, 10].
Functionally, LPA1 receptor has been demonstrated
to be an important modulator for the normal adult
hippocampal neurogenesis and hippocampal-dependent
1
30
35
2
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
M. Garca-Fernandez
et al.
METHODS
Animals and Experimental Groups
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
AQ2
145
AQ3
150
155
AQ4
Statistical Analysis
160
165
RESULTS
170
175
180
185
DISCUSSION
Oxidative stress is the deleterious effect of the imbalance between free radical production and the available
antioxidant defence capacity. Indeed, when free radicals are not adequately removed or neutralized by antioxidants, they react with lipids, proteins, and nucleic
acids, damaging the cellular functions and causing cell
death [2325]. The brain is particularly susceptible to
oxidative stress due to its high oxygen consumption rate,
high abundance of both redox-capable transition metal
ions and unsaturated lipids, and low availability of antioxidant enzymes compared with other organs [26]. We
have studied the induction of oxidative stress in the hippocampus of WT and malpar1 KO mice after chronic
immobilization and compare it with control conditions.
Our results showed that the chronic stress protocol used
here is not able to induce an overall oxidative stress enhancement in the hippocampus of WT mice, as 21 days
of restraint treatment did not increase the production of
free radicals and/or reduce the antioxidant defence capacity. These results might depend on the habituation
of the WT mice to the chronic stress procedure because
repeated exposure to the same stressor leads to a process of adaptation to the aversive stimulus. The chronic
immobilization protocol used in our study is highly predictable and of mild or moderate intensity compared
to other protocols [27]. According to previous studies, both features of the protocol may facilitate habituation and adaptation of our WT mice to chronic stress
[28, 29]. In this way, some studies have demonstrated
the capacity of the animals to develop adaptive mechanisms to predictable stressors when they are presented
chronically [30, 31]. Indeed, we have previously found
that WT animals submitted to this same stress protocol present changes neither in corticosterone levels nor
in hippocampal neurogenesis [13]. The only change observed in the WT mice under chronic stress was a light
increase of GPX activity. GPX reduces both free hydrogen peroxide and LOOH [32], and the action of GPX
on LOOH can prevent their enhancement in the hippocampus of restrained mice, reducing the cell damage.
In this way, the increased GPX activity in absence of
any oxidative damage is likely an adaptation to repeated
stress allowing the regulation of cellular peroxides. The
increased activity of some antioxidant enzymes results in
the rapid scavenging of ROS and consequently less cell
damage [33].
The lack of LPA1 receptor by itself does not produce either any change in the antioxidant capacity or
in the free radicals production under basal conditions.
190
195
200
205
210
215
220
225
230
235
AQ5
M. Garca-Fernandez
et al.
5,0
Control
Chronic restraint
LOOH (nmol/mg)
4,0
3,0
2,0
1,0
0,0
WT
60,0
50,0
Control
Chronic restraint
B
12,5
*
CAT (Umg/protein)
70,0
KO
40,0
30,0
20,0
10,0
10,0
7,5
5,0
2,5
0,0
0,0
1,2
Control
Chronic restraint
KO
WT
1,2
1,0
1,0
0,8
0,6
0,4
0,2
0,0
COX (Umg/protein)
WT
1,4
Control
Chronic restraint
C
*
Control
Chronic restraint
KO
0,8
0,6
*
0,4
0,2
0,0
WT
KO
WT
KO
malpa1 KO mice submitted to chronic restraint (21 days/3 hours a day). (a) LOOH,
(b) GPX activity, (c) CAT [18] activity, (d) SOD activity and (e) COX activity. Bars represent means SEM of 6 mice. p < .05 according to LSD. KO = malpa1 KO mice; WT
= wild-type mice.
240
245
250
duction is still very high in the malpar1 KO mice after chronic restraint. Therefore, this LOOH overproduction indicates the inability of the GPX enhancement
for their detoxification, leading to increase the peroxidative stress that will contribute to the overproduction
of free radicals and to the oxidative damage [21, 34].
The peroxidation of membrane lipids as the observed
in our study is one of the most common consequences
of oxidative stress. Since the hippocampus (and brain
in general) includes high content of polyunsaturated
fatty acids, this reaction produces marked damage to
the structure and function of cell membranes [35, 36].
255
260
265
270
275
280
285
290
295
300
305
310
315
sence of LPA1 receptor may be, at least in part, responsible for the increased oxidative stress observed. Although
this study was not designed to test this hypothesis, future works will elucidate more clearly the relationship
between these factors.
320
CONCLUSIONS
Taken together, our results showed upregulation of antioxidant enzyme activity and lipid peroxidation in combination with a downregulation of COX activity in the
hippocampus of malpar1 KO mice when submitted to
chronic stress. Increases in antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid peroxidation are consistent with enhanced
oxidative stress. This increased oxidative stress may contribute to explain the enhanced vulnerability of this
genotype to chronic stress. Furthermore, these results
highlight the relevance of the LPA1 pathway signaling
in the hippocampus to regulate the response to chronic
stressors.
325
330
335
REFERENCES
1. Choi JW, Herr DR, Noguchi K, Yung YC, Lee CW, Mutoh T,
Lin ME, Teo ST, Park KE, Mosley AN, Chun J. LPA receptors:
subtypes and biological actions. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol.
2010;50:15786.
2. Moolenaar WH, van Meeteren LA, Giepmans BN. The ins
and outs of lysophosphatidic acid signaling. Bioessays. 2004
Aug;26(8):87081.
3. Chun J. Lysophospholipids in the nervous system.
Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2005 Sep;77(14):4651.
4. Estivill-Torrus G, Llebrez-Zayas P, Matas-Rico E, Santin L, Pedraza C, De Diego I, Del Arco I, Fernandez-Llebrez P, Chun J,
De Fonseca FR. Absence of LPA1 signaling results in defective
cortical development. Cereb Cortex. 2008 Apr;18(4):93850.
5. Fukushima N, Ishii I, Contos JJ, Weiner JA, Chun J.
Lysophospholipid receptors. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol.
2001;41:50734.
6. Noguchi K, Herr D, Mutoh T, Chun J. Lysophosphatidic
acid (LPA) and its receptors. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2009
Feb;9(1):1523.
7. Fukushima N, Shano S, Moriyama R, Chun J. Lysophosphatidic acid stimulates neuronal differentiation of cortical neuroblasts through the LPA1-G(i/o) pathway. Neurochem Int. 2007
Jan;50(2):3027.
8. Kingsbury MA, Rehen SK, Contos JJ, Higgins CM, Chun J.
Non-proliferative effects of lysophosphatidic acid enhance cortical growth and folding. Nat Neurosci. 2003 Dec;6(12):12929.
9. Fujiwara Y, Sebok A, Meakin S, Kobayashi T, MurakamiMurofushi K, Tigyi G. Cyclic phosphatidic acid elicits
neurotrophin-like actions in embryonic hippocampal neurons.
J Neurochem. 2003 Dec;87(5):127283.
10. Rhee HJ, Nam JS, Sun Y, Kim MJ, Choi HK, Han DH,
Kim NH, Huh SO. Lysophosphatidic acid stimulates cAMP
accumulation and cAMP response element-binding protein
340
345
350
355
360
365
370
375
M. Garca-Fernandez
et al.
11.
380
12.
385
13.
390
14.
395
15.
16.
400
17.
405
18.
410
19.
415
20.
420
21.
425
22.
430
23.
24.
435
25.
440
445
450
455
460
465
470
475
480
485
490
495
500
505
C
510