Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Tubular Structures X
Jaurrieta, M.A., Alonso, A., Chica, J.A. (Eds.)
ABSTRACT: The use of circular hollow section members in bridge design is a relatively new concept. The
application of such constructions is strongly influenced by the design and manufacturing of the joints. In general, there are two possibilities: either to use cast steel joints or welded joints.
This contribution tries to give an overview about the advantages and disadvantages of both possibilities concerning the aspects of resistance, fatigue, manufacturing and economy in order to help practical engineers in
their decisions and to allow for a further application of circular hollow sections in bridge design.
As a crucial question, special considerations are given to the fatigue assessment of welded circular hollow
section joints. For an example of a recently completed bridge with a typical spatial CHS truss and cast steel
joints it has been shown that also welded connections would have been a possible alternative. This conclusion
is drawn from numerical studies based on FE calculations applying the hot-spot stress approach for the fatigue
assessment of the welded joints.
1 INTRODUCTION
2.1 General
The use of circular hollow section members as part
of the main load-carrying structure of bridge girders
is a relatively new constructional concept. During
the last couple years several steel-concrete composite bridges had been constructed, see Table 1. The
typical cross-section of this type of bridge generally
consists of a tubular spatial truss girder carrying the
concrete deck slab (Figure 1). The deck slab is connected directly to the steel structure by either shear
studs, concrete dowels or in some cases where no
top chord exist, as e.g. at the Nesenbachtal bridge
by saw-tooth connections, see Schlaich et. al. (2000).
3 JOINT CONSTRUCTION
3.1 Cast Steel Joints
3.1.1 Material Properties
Through the ongoing development within the
manufacturing of cast steel products it is possible
nowadays to gain almost the same mechanical and
chemical qualities in terms of strength, toughness,
weldability and corrosion resistance as for ordinary
rolled steel products, see e.g. Schober (2001) or
Mang & Herion (2001).
year of completion
span length
h/L of steel truss
type of joint construction
joint type
brace dimensions
chord dimensions
joint parameters
= d1/d0
= d0/2t0
= t1/t0
; cos()
1)
Lully1)
(CH)
1997
43 m
1 / 14
welded
KK
267 / 25
508 / 36
Dttwill2)
(CH)
2001
38 m
1 / 12
welded
KK
267 / 25
508 / 50
0.53
7.06
0.69
60 ; 0.5
69
0.53
5.08
0.50
60 ; 0.5
69
2)
Aarwangen2)
(CH)
1997
48m
1 / 27
welded
K
194 / 28
406 / 36
Nesenbachtal
(D)
1999
25 / 50 / 36 m
1 / 11-22
cast steel
KK
194 / 10-60
324 / 16-80
Korntal-Mnch.
(D)
2002
32 / 41 m
1 / 13
cast steel
KK
267 / 28-45
457 / 45-67
0.48
5.64
0.78
45 ; 0.71
--
0.60
10.13-2.03
0.63-0.75
46 ; 0.69
102
0.58
5.07-3.51
0.62-0.69
60 ; 0.5
90
work. Usually, additional machining of the connection device is required in order to fulfill the small
tolerances for a precise fitting of the tubular sections.
The quality assurance has to be guaranteed for
both, the welded connection between the cast joint
and the tubular sections and the cast steel material itself. In Germany, non-destructive quality control
usually is performed by ultrasonic devices in accordance with DIN 1690 (1991).
In order to ensure an optimal fitting of the diagonal brace members onto the continuous chord at the
very complicated intersection area a precise cutting
of the tubular members is required. Nowadays computer-operated profile cutting machines allow for an
efficient and very precise cutting process.
The welding is mainly manual. For a reliable
quality inspection of the welds, especially the critical
weld root, the geometrical dimensions of the joint
should be designed in a way that enough space for
inspection devices is guaranteed.
3.2.2 Fatigue
Welded CHS joints are very sensitive to fatigue
because the geometric discontinuities of the welds
lead to a high stress concentration. Under static
loading, these stress concentrations are less important due to local plastification. However, under re-
Table 2. Construction detail and detail category of a uniplanar CHS K-joint with gap according to Eurocode 3 Part 1.9 (2002)
Detail Category Constructural detail
90
m=5
45
m=5
Description
t0
2 .0
t1
t0
= 1 .0
t1
- 35 50
- d0 /t0 25
(1)
4.5
4.5
3.0
3.0
1.5
1.5
0.0
0.0
11
16
21
26
31
36
node number
11
16
21
foot length tw = 0
26
31
36
node number
foot length tw > 0
Figure 10. Influence of the weld shape on the stress concentration factor (SCF)
do
t0
d1
t1
g
= d1/d0
= d0/2t0
= t1/t0
joint 1
joint 2
joint 3
457
65
267
45
79.0
0.58
3.52
0.69
60
90
457
55
267
36
65.5
0.58
4.15
0.65
60
90
457
45
267
28
52.8
0.58
5.07
0.62
60
90
(2)
(3)
(4)
The recommended minimum SCF value is a reasonable assumption and should especially be applied
for thin sections used for buildings or crane structures. However, the authors believe, that for thick
sections and high quality full penetration welds with
good accessibility SCF values in the range between
1.5 and 2.0 may be acceptable as well.
With the above mentioned assumptions and based
on the SCF values given in Table 5, the fatigue limit
state has been verified for all three joints, thus
clearly indicating, that for the specific type of bridge
also welded CHS joint would have been possible.
7 CONCLUSIONS
This contribution covers the application of circular hollow sections in bridge design and tries to give
an overview about the advantages and disadvantages
of either cast steel or welded joints in order to help
practical engineers in their decisions and to allow for
a further application of circular hollow sections in
bridge design.
Concerning a cost effective and robust design of
CHS joints for bridge structures the following conclusions are drawn:
- cast steel joints should be used if there are several
members to be connected at one joint resulting in a
complex joint geometry. For such cases, the casting
process allows an optimal design of the joint according to the flow of internal forces, increasing
their static and fatigue resistance compared to
welded joints.
- for standard joint types such as e.g. K- or KKjoints that are typically used for triangular truss
girders, welded joints are the more economic solution and, providing a high manufacturing standard
especially for the welds, a possible alternative.
Through detailed investigations connected to a
recently completed CHS truss bridge near Stuttgart,
it has been shown, that for this bridge instead of cast
steel also welded joints would have been a possible
alternative. This conclusion could be drawn from
numerical studies based on FE calculations applying
the hot-spot stress approach for the fatigue assessment of the welded joints.
Table 5. Stress concentrations factors (SCF)
value
2.25
SCF
chord
KK
ch ,ax
SCF
0.63
1.0
1.0
1.41
brace loading
joint 1
joint 2
joint 3
1.99
2.06
2.08
chord loading
brace
chord
brace
SCFbKK
,ax
SCFchKK,ch
SCFbKK
,ch
1.68
1.78
1.85
1.40
1.39
1.37
0.30
0.36
0.41
9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors would like to express their gratitude
to Mr. G. Stuba who did the FE-Analysis within his
diploma-thesis.