Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
OUTLINE
Introduction
Objectives
Conclusion
INTRODUCTION
Suwung
Landfill
Leachate
Treatment Plant
Regulation
OBJECTIVES
To know the quantity of leachate
Leachate Generation
Moisture components at a sanitary landfill (Fenn et al., 1975)
Actual
Evapotranspiration
Precipitation
Surface Run Off
Vegetation
cover
Soil cover
Infiltration
Soil moisture
storage
Percolation
Solid waste
moisture
storage
Solid waste
Leachate collection
Liner
Leachate
Leachate Generation
Water balance calculations (Thornthwaite Method)
Calculate the percolation of water into the solid waste
System of water balance (Damanhuri, 2008)
Data
1. Climatology
Precipitation and temperatur
(1990 2000)
Position of meteorological
station (8o44 LS)
2. Landfill design
Effective landfill area (28 Ha)
Type and thickness of top
soil (Sandy loam, 60 cm)
Slope of surface (3%)
RO = P x CRO
I = P - RO
i = Heat
Parameter
Temperature (oC)
Heat
PET
Daylight Factor
PET Adjusted
P (mm)
CRO
RO
I
I - PET
APWL
ST
ST
AET
PERC (mm)
Jan
28.40
13.87
174.36
1.07
186.56
405
0.125
51
354
168
0
100
-5
187
173
Feb
32.58
17.08
326.29
0.96
313.24
331
0.125
41
290
-24
-24
78
-22
312
0
Mar
31.38
16.13
274.93
1.04
285.93
194
0.125
24
170
-116
-140
24
-54
224
0
Apr
27.40
13.14
148.04
1.00
148.04
116
0.125
15
102
-47
-186
15
-9
111
0
May
28.00
13.58
163.43
1.02
166.69
76
0.125
10
67
-100
-287
5
-10
77
0
Jun
29.15
14.43
196.38
0.97
190.49
41
0.125
5
36
-155
-441
1
-4
40
0
Jul
27.45
13.17
149.28
1.01
150.77
22
0.125
3
19
-132
-573
1
0
19
0
Aug
26.60
12.56
129.31
1.02
131.90
6
0.125
1
5
-127
-699
1
0
5
0
Sep
27.25
13.03
144.38
1.00
144.38
24
0.125
3
21
-123
-823
1
0
21
0
Oct
28.20
13.72
168.82
1.05
177.26
131
0.125
16
115
-63
-885
1
0
115
0
Nov
28.75
14.13
184.38
1.04
191.76
227
0.125
28
199
7
0
8
7
192
0
Des
28.45
13.91
175.76
1.09
191.58
318
0.125
40
278
87
0
95
87
192
0
Total
168.74
2278.61
1891
236
1655
1492
173
Leachate generation (using graphic of annual leachate quantities (After Fenn et al., 1975)
28
173
50
32,5
32
31,5
31
30,5
30
29,5
29
28,5
28
27,5
Dec-10
Anaerobic
Influent
May-11
Anaerobic Facultative
Effluent
Effluent
Aerobic
Effluent
Constructed
Wetland
Effluent
Dec-10
May-11
8,5
8
pH
Temperature (oC)
7,5
7
6,5
Anaerobic
Influent
Anaerobic
Effluent
Facultative
Effluent
Aerobic
Effluent
Constructed
Wetland
Effluent
TSS (mg/L)
Dec-10
May-11
Not comply with quality
standard (400 mg/L)
Anaerobic
Influent
Anaerobic
Effluent
Facultative
Effluent
Aerobic
Effluent
Constructed
Wetland
Effluent
25000
TDS (mg/L)
20000
Dec-10
May-11
15000
10000
5000
0
Anaerobic
Influent
Anaerobic Facultative
Effluent
Effluent
Aerobic
Effluent
Constructed
Wetland
Effluent
TSS increase at the outlet of facultative pond probably because of algae at the surface of the pond or excess sludge
at the bottom of the pond.
TSS increase at the outlet of constructed wetland, probably because of the saturated constructed wetland or the
remains of dead plants, carried over into the waste water stream.
TDS increase until the end of treatment because of the entering sea water into the plant when tidal.
Dec-10
May-11
BOD (mg/L)
3500
3000
Not comply
with quality
standard
(150 mg/L)
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Anaerobic Facultative
Effluent
Effluent
Aerobic
Effluent
Constructed
Wetland
Effluent
COD (mg/L)
Anaerobic
Influent
9000
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
Dec-10
May-11
Not comply
with quality
standard
(300 mg/L)
Anaerobic
Influent
Anaerobic Facultative
Effluent
Effluent
Aerobic
Effluent
Constructed
Wetland
Effluent
BOD and COD in December 2010 are lower than BOD and COD in May 2011.
BOD and COD increase at constructed wetland outlet, probably caused by the absence of vegetation in the land
and there may be remnants of organic matter that comes from the dead plants.
100,00
Dec-10
May-11
80,00
60,00
40,00
20,00
0,00
Anaerobic
Pond
Facultative
Pond
80,00
Dec-10
70,00
May-11
60,00
50,00
40,00
30,00
20,00
10,00
0,00
Anaerobic
Pond
Facultative
Pond
BOD and COD removal efficiency are the main indicator of performance of leachate treatment by biological
process such as stabilization ponds and constructed wetland.
In general, BOD and COD removal efficiency in every unit of leachate treatment are very low causing BOD and
COD at the outlet of treatment plant do not comply with the quality standard.
700
May-11
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Aerobic
Effluent
Constructed
Wetland
Effluent
60
Dec-10
May-11
50
40
30
20
10
0
Anaerobic
Influent
Anaerobic
Effluent
Facultative
Effluent
Aerobic
Effluent
Constructed
Wetland
Effluent
12
Dec-10
May-11
10
8
6
4
bacteria
Anaerobic
Influent
Anaerobic
Effluent
Facultative
Effluent
Aerobic
Effluent
Dec-10
25
Constructed
Wetland
Effluent
May-11
20
15
10
5
0
Anaerobic
Influent
Anaerobic Facultative
Effluent
Effluent
Aerobic
Effluent
Constructed
Wetland
Effluent
bacteria
2NO2- + O2 2NO3-
35
May-11
Fe (mg/L)
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Anaerobic
Influent
Anaerobic
Effluent
Facultative
Effluent
Aerobic
Effluent
Constructed
Wetland
Effluent
8
Influen IPL
Efluen IPL
mg/L
5
4
3
2
1
0
Copper (Cu)
Zinc (Zn)
Total Chrom
(Cr)
Cadmium
(Cd)
Lead (Pb)
Unit
Existing
Condition
Design Criteria
Info*
Source
m
day
kg/m3.day
%
2.5
17.6
0.21
38.21 / 17.66
2.5 5
25
0.3
60 90
V
V
V
X
Qasim, 1985
WHO, 1987
WHO, 1987
Qasim, 1985
m
day
kg/ha.day
%
0.4 0.75
2
6050.5
5.30 / 86.69
12
7 50
15 120
70 95
X
X
X
X
Qasim, 1985
Benefield & Randall, 1980
Qasim, 1985
Benefield & Randall, 1980
m
day
kg/ha.day
%
1.4
2.1
2691.25
12.02 / 0.17
0.3 1.0
5 20
40 120
40 80
X
X
X
X
Qasim, 1985
Qasim, 1985
Qasim, 1985
Qasim, 1985
day
m
m
kg/ha.day
m3/m2.day
ha/(103m3/day)
%
1.5
1.3
1789.67
0.446
0.224
9.35 / 0
3 4 (BOD)
6 10 (N)
0.3 0.6
0.5 0.8
< 112
0.015 0.05
2.2 7.2
65 88
X
X
X
X
X
X
Anaerobic Pond
Depth
Min. Detention Time
Organic Loading Rate
BOD Removal
Facultative Pond
Depth
Detention Time
Organic Loading Rate
BOD Removal
Aerobic Pond
Depth
Detention Time
Organic Loading Rate
BOD Removal
Constr. Wetland
Detention Time
Water Depth
Thickness of Media
BOD Loading
Hidraulic Loading
Specific Area
BOD Removal
Alternative of Redesign
The addition of equalization basin unit before the anaerobic
pond unit.
The addition of by-pass channel that connects directly the
equalization basin to the facultative pond without passing
through the anaerobic pond.
Redesign the facultative pond unit and aerobic pond unit by
adjusting the depth of the pond in accordance with the design
criteria and expand the pond if the land is available or
redesign existing facultative pond becomes aerated
facultative lagoon.
Redesign constructed wetland unit with the appropriate type
and selection of suitable plants for treating leachate.
CONCLUSION
The quantity of leachate from Suwung Landfill is 1.6 L/s.
THANK YOU...