Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ABSTRACT
Background. Higher levels of religious involvement are modestly associated with better health,
after taking account of other inuences, such as age, sex and social support. However, little account
is taken of spiritual beliefs that are not tied to personal or public religious practice. Our objective
was to develop a standardized measure of spirituality for use in clinical research.
Method. We characterized the core components of spirituality using narrative data from a
purposive sample of people, some of whom were near the end of their lives. These data were
developed into statements in a scale to measure strength of spiritual beliefs and its reliability,
validity and factor structure were evaluated in order to reach a nal version.
Results. Thirty-nine people took part in the qualitative study to dene the nature of spirituality in
their lives. These data were used to construct a 47-item instrument that was evaluated in 372 people
recruited in medical and non-medical settings. Analysis of these statements led to a 24-item version
that was evaluated in a further sample of 284 people recruited in similar settings. The nal 20-item
questionnaire performed with high testretest and internal reliability and measures spirituality
across a broad religious and non-religious perspective.
Conclusions. A measure of spiritual belief that is not limited to religious thought, may contribute
to research in psychiatry and medicine.
INTRODUCTION
Although mainstream medicine and psychology
have taken little account of spiritual and religious beliefs in the lives of people and their
aictions, since the time of William James there
has been a rising interest in measuring such
concepts (Hill & Hood, 1999). Not only did
James attempt to dene religious belief and
understand its origins (James, 1902), he also
derived a well-known scientic philosophy that
would embrace research into spirituality. He
* Address for correspondence : Professor Michael King,
Department of Mental Health Sciences, Royal Free and University
College Medical School, University College London NW3 2PF, UK.
(Email : m.king@medsch.ucl.ac.uk)
417
418
M. King et al.
AIM
The aim was to develop a standardized measure
of spirituality that goes beyond conventional
religious belief for use in psychological and
health research.
Specic objectives
(1) To explore the meaning of spirituality using
semi-structured interviews and focus groups.
(2) To characterize the core components of
spirituality arising from these qualitative
data.
(3) To apply these components as statements
in a scale to measure strength of spiritual
beliefs.
(4) To evaluate the reliability, validity and factor
structure of such a scale.
METHOD
Ethical approval was granted by local research
ethics committees.
419
420
M. King et al.
Table 1.
Demographic characteristics
of participants
Version 1 of
scale n (%)
Version 2 of
scale n (%)
Site of recruitment
Oncology/palliative care patients
Sta or students
GP patients
Missing
65 (17)
174 (47)
133 (36)
100 (35)
26 (9)
158 (56)
Gender
Male
Female
Missing
111 (30)
260 (70)
1 (0)
132 (46)
152 (54)
Marital status
Married
Has partner
Single
Divorced/separated
Widowed
Missing
171 (46)
62 (17)
92 (25)
30 (8)
9 (2)
8 (2)
145 (51)
39 (14)
61 (21)
22 (8)
13 (5)
4 (1)
Ethnicity
White
Blacka
South Asianb
Chinese
Other
Missing
312 (84)
19 (5)
17 (5)
3 (1)
19 (5)
2 (1)
210 (74)
23 (8)
16 (6)
5 (2)
28 (10)
2 (1)
Employment status
Employed
Unemployed seeking work
Student
Retired
Home manager
On sick leave
Other
Missing
266 (72)
10 (3)
14 (4)
46 (12)
20 (5)
11 (3)
5 (1)
116 (41)
10 (4)
32 (11)
67 (24)
18 (6)
11 (4)
19 (7)
11 (4)
Religious belief
Does not observe a religion
Christianity other
Christianity Roman Catholic
Judaism
Hinduism
Islam
Buddhism
Other
Missing
127 (34)
96 (26)
70 (19)
29 (8)
9 (2)
9 (2)
5 (1)
12 (3)
15 (4)
76 (27)
95 (33)
45 (16)
21 (7)
12 (4)
12 (4)
1 (0)
10 (4)
12 (4)
a
b
421
Table 2.
Content and testretest reliability of version 1 with reasons for item removal
Weighted
kappa
Item
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
a
b
c
d
e
0.66
0.57
0.61
0.66
0.77
0.67
0.88
0.70
0.74
0.66
0.74
0.71
0.87
0.66
0.87
0.81
0.78
0.70
0.73
0.77
0.57
0.70
0.50
0.61
0.88
0.87
0.82
0.69
0.68
0.74
0.56
0.80
0.78
0.88
0.83
0.54
0.72
0.61
0.74
0.83
0.83
0.88
0.57
0.64
0.58
0.84
0.75
422
M. King et al.
Table 3.
Item
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
0.61
0.60
0.87
0.84
0.85
0.69
0.84
0.76
0.77
0.74
0.56
0.73
0.87
0.87
0.84
0.76
0.79
0.80
0.92
0.73
0.80
0.82
0.64
0.93
423
Table 4.
Individual item correlation of the nal 20-item version of the Beliefs and Values Scalea
with total score on the Intrinsic Religious Motivation Scale
Correlation
coecient
Item
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
I am a spiritual person
I believe I have a spirit or soul that can survive my death
I believe in a personal God
I believe meditation has value
I believe God is an all pervading presence
I believe what happens after I die is determined by how I have lived my life
I believe there are forces for evil in the Universe
Although I cannot always understand, I believe everything happens for a reason
I believe human physical contact can be a spiritual experience
I feel most at one with the world when surrounded by nature
I believe in life after death
I am a religious person
Religious ceremonies are important to me
I believe life is planned out for me
I believe God is a life force
At least once in my life, I have had an intense spiritual experience
I believe that there is a heaven
I believe the human spirit is immortal
I believe prayer has value
I believe there is a God
0.55
0.53
0.59
0.17*
0.64
0.56
0.47
0.39
0.13**
0.05 N.S.
0.50
0.52
0.43
0.50
0.54
0.49
0.57
0.43
0.58
0.63
All correlations coecients except those marked p<0.00001, * p<0.02, ** p<0.05, N.S. p>0.05.
Factor 2 in bold, remainder are factor 1.
a
Each statement of the Beliefs and Values Scale has ve possible responses : strongly agree (score 4) ; agree (3) ; neither agree nor disagree
(2) ; disagree (1) ; strongly disagree (0). Possible range of score 080 with higher scores indicating stronger spiritual beliefs.
424
M. King et al.
Table 5.
Associations between mean scores on the nal 20-item version of the Beliefs
and Values Scale and participant prole
Total scale score
mean (S.D.)
Sex
Men (120)a
Women (134)
Recruitment
Religion
No religion (174)
Christian (117)
Other religion (52)
Ethnicity
White (188)
Black Caribbean, Black British
& Black African (17)
Indian subcontinent (21)
Other (27)
Civil status
Employment
Employed
Remainder
a
42.5 (16.8)
49.6 (13.9)
43.9 (15.5)
47.5 (15.7)
31.7 (13.0)
43.2 (12.0)
40.4 (12.3)
43.5 (15.4)
56.8 (16.0)
51.5 (15.0)
54.1 (11.8)
47.1 (16.0)
40.2 (17.3)
47.3 (13.4)
44.3 (16.2)
47.4 (15.4)
Signicance
t=3.69
p=0.0003
t=1.73
p=0.08
F=72.4
p<0.0001
F=8.13
p<0.0001
F=3.1
p=0.05
t=1.50
p=0.13
(n)=number of participants.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank all the participants, the sta of the
participating institutions and general practices,
the Camden and Islington Mental Health
and Social Care Trust, and The Royal Free
Hampstead NHS Trust. We would also like
to thank Hele`ne Seddon Glass and Jeevi
Marathiasan for their help with data collection.
The study was funded by Marie Curie Cancer
Care.
425
DECLARATION OF INTEREST
None.
REFERENCES
Allport, G. W. & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation
and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 5,
432443.
Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical Statistics for Medical Research.
Chapman and Hall : London.
Andrykowski, M. A., Curran, S. L., Studts, J. L., Cunningham, L.,
Carpenter, J. S., McGrath, P. C., Sloan, D. A. & Kenady, D. E.
(1996). Psychosocial adjustment and quality of life in women with
breast cancer and benign breast problems : a controlled comparison. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 49, 827834.
Burke, E. & Phillips, A. (1990). A Philosophical Enquiry into the
Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. Oxford University
Press : Oxford.
Coleman, J. A. (2002). Selling God in America : American commercial culture as a climate of hospitality to religion. In Meaning
and Modernity : Religion, Polity and Self (ed. R. Madsen,
W. M. Sullivan, A. Swidler and S. M. Tipton). University of
California Press : Berkeley, CA.
Debray, R. (2004). God: An Itinerary. Verso : London.
Durkheim, E. (1912). The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life :
A Study in Religious Sociology. Allen & Unwin: London.
Harris Interactive Inc. (2003). Harris Poll : the religious and other
beliefs of Americans, 2003 (http://www.harrisinteractive.com/
harris_poll/index.asp?PID=359). Harris Interactive. Accessed 26
February 2003.
Hill, P. C. & Hood, R. W. (1999). Measures of Religiosity. Religious
Education Press: Birmingham, AL.
Hoge, D. R. (1972). A validated intrinsic religious motivation scale.
Journal for the Scientic Study of Religion 11, 369376.
Hunsberger, B. (1991). Empirical work in the psychology of religion.
Canadian Psychology 32, 497504.
ICM Research Ltd (2004). What the world thinks of God (http://
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/wtwtgod/3518375.stm). BBC.
Accessed 26 February 2004.
James, W. (1902). The Varieties of Religious Experience: a Study
in Human Nature. Longmans : New York.
James, W. (1907). Pragmatism. Longmans, Green : New York.
King, M., Speck, P. & Thomas, A. (1995). The Royal Free interview
for religious and spiritual beliefs : development and standardization. Psychological Medicine 25, 11251134.
King, M., Speck, P. & Thomas, A. (2001). The Royal Free interview
for spiritual and religious beliefs : development and validation of
a self-report version. Psychological Medicine 31, 10151023.
King, M. B. & Dein, S. (1998). The spiritual variable in psychiatric
research. Psychological Medicine 28, 12591262.
Koenig, H. G. (1998). Handbook of Religion and Mental Health.
Academic Press: San Diego, CA.
Koenig, H. G., George, L. K. & Peterson, B. L. (1998). Religiosity
and remission of depression in medically ill older patients.
American Journal of Psychiatry 155, 536542.
Koenig, H. G., McCullough, M. E. & Larson, D. B. (2001). Handbook
of Religion and Health. Oxford University Press : Oxford, New
York.
McCullough, M. E. & Larson, D. B. (1999). Religion and depression:
a review of the literature. Twin Research 2, 126136.
McCullough, M. E., Larson, D. B., Koenig, H. G. & Lerner, R.
(1999). The mismeasurement of religion in mortality research.
Mortality 4, 183194.
Newburg, A. & Aquili, E. (eds). (2001). Why God Wont Go Away :
Brain Science and the Biology of Belief. Ballantine : New York.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.