Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ISSN 2229-5518
I.
INTRODUCTION
IJSER 2012
http://www.ijser.org
waste properly.
2.1Cement
The cement used was Ordinary Portland cement (43 Grade)
with a specific gravity of 3.15. Initial and final setting time
of the cement was 50 min and 365 min, respectively. Its
chemical composition is given in Table 1.
Table 1: Following are the Chemical properties of cement (OPC), Fly ash and Rice husk
ash
Materials
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
Cement
19.71
5.20
3.73
62.91
2.54
Fly ash
40
25
20
0.99
Rice husk
ash
78.21
(SiO2+ Al2O3+
Fe2O3)
CaO
MgO
LOI
SO3
K2O
Na2O3
0.96
2.72
0.90
0.25
3.71
3.0
1.74
0.80
0.96
4.89
--------
-------
-------
------
=82.64
IJSER 2012
http://www.ijser.org
2.4 Fibers
Steel fiber having low carbon and its both end were hooked
were used. The steel fibers have a length of 30 mm,
diameter of 0.60 mm, aspect ratio of 50, and density of 7.85
g/cm3. Collect from Stewols Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur.
2.5 Aggregate
Good quality river sand was used as a fine aggregate. The
fineness modulus, specific gravity and dry density are 2.32,
2.68 and 1690 kg/m3. Coarse aggregate passing through
20mm and retained 10mm sieve was used.Its specific
gravity and dry density was 2.7 and 1550 kg/m3.
2.6 Chemical Admixture
A commercial AC- Green Slump-GS-02B black cat Chemical
Limited plasticizer From Nagpur was used to maintain the
workability of fresh concrete. The dosage of hyper
plasticizer was 1% to 1.5% by weight of cement of the
binder content of concrete. The aim of keeping the amount
of plasticizer constant is to neglect, if any, the influence of
plasticizer on the properties of hardened concrete.
3. EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME
Experimental programme comprises of test on cement,
RHA,FA, cement concrete with partial replacement of
cement withRHA and FA.
2) Vee-Bee = 15sec.
3) Compaction factor =0.95
4) Flow Test =79 %.
IJSER 2012
http://www.ijser.org
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Mix Proportion
FA
by%
of
cement
Control Mix
30
27.5
25
22.5
20
17.5
15
7
Days
14
Days
28
Days
56
Days
90 Days
Flexural
strength
Split
tensile
strength
0
2.5
5
7.5
10
12.5
15
35.56
32.89
31.11
31.56
22.67
22.22
18.22
17.78
39.11
33.33
31.33
32.44
34.67
26.22
24.89
24
45.78
39.11
35.11
40.44
41.78
33.78
30.22
28.89
48
42.22
37.33
43.11
44.89
35.11
32
30.67
49.78
44.89
39.56
45.78
46.67
37.78
34.67
33.78
7.22
6.89
6.11
6.44
7.55
6.22
5.55
5.55
4.38
4.10
3.82
3.67
3.96
2.97
2.26
1.98
50
45
COMP. STRENGTH IN (N/mm^2)
CONTROL
MIX
(30+0)
40
35
(27.5+2.5)
30
(25+5)
25
(22.5+7.5)
20
15
(20+10)
10
(17.5+12.5)
5
(15+15)
CONTROL
MIX
(30+0)
3.5
(27.5+2.5)
4.5
TENSILE STRENGTH IN (N/mm^2)
Sr.
No.
(25+5)
2.5
(22.5+7.5)
2
1.5
(20+10)
(17.5+12.5)
0.5
(15+15)
0
1
% OF (FA+RHA)
% OF (FA+RHA)
GRAPH 1: 28 Days Compressive strength GRAPH 2: 28 Days Tensile strength
IJSER 2012
http://www.ijser.org
10
CONTROL
MIX
(30+0)
7
6
(27.5+2.5)
5
(25+5)
(22.5+7.5)
(20+10)
CONTROL
MIX
30+0
27.5+2.5
DEFLECTION IN MM
25+5
22.5+7.5
4
3
20+10
(17.5+12.5)
17.5+12.5
(15+15)
15+15
% 0F (FA+RHA)
GRAPH 3: 28 Days Flexural strength
10
20
30
LOAD IN KN
GRAPH 4: Deflection in Beam
40
60
CONTROL MIX
50
(30+0)
40
(27.5+2.5)
(25+5)
30
(22.5+7.5)
(20+10)
20
(17.5+12.5)
10
(15+15)
0
7 DAYS
14 DAYS
28 DAYS
56DAYS
NO. OF DAYS
GRAPH 5: Study of Comparision of Compressive strength in No. of Days
IJSER 2012
http://www.ijser.org
90days
50
0%
22.22
26.22
33.78
35.11
37.78
6.22
2.97
50
0.25%
23.56
28
34.22
36
37.33
3.33
3.53
50
0.50%
24
28.89
37.33
38.67
40.44
6.67
3.68
50
0.75%
25.33
30.22
38.22
40.44
41.78
7.78
3.96
50
1%
24.44
28.44
36.89
37.78
38.67
8.33
4.38
39
38
37
36
35
34
33
32
31
0%
0.25%
0.50%
0.75%
1%
1
Table 3 Compressive strength, Flexural strength, Split tensile strength with using steel fiber by replacement
of cement of 20%fly ash and 10% rice husk ash .
Sr.N
Strength after curing in N/mm2
Aspect
o.
% of steel
ratio of
14
28Da 56Day
90
Flexural
Split tensile
fiber
7 Days
fibers
Days
ys
s
Days
strength
strength
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0%
0.25%
0.50%
0.75%
1%
45
0%
40
35
0.25%
30
25
0.50%
20
15
0.75%
10
5
1%
0
7 DAYS
14 DAYS
28 DAYS
56DAYS
90days
8
0%
0.25%
DEFLECTION IN MM
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0.50%
0.75%
1%
0%
0.25%
5
0.50%
4
3
0.75%
2
1
1%
10
20
30
40
USING STEEL FIBER WITH (20%FA+10%RHA)
&LOAD IN KN
GRAPH 9: 28 Days Flexural strength GRAPH 10: Deflection in Beam
USING STEEL FIBER WITH (20%FA+10%RHA)
Table 4 Reduction in weight and compressive strength of concrete cubes immersed in 1% sulphuric acid
solution.
Sr.
No.
Mix designation
Control mix
22.5%FA+7.5%RHA
by%of cement
20%FA+10%RHA
by% of cement with
using 0.75% steel
fiber
Average
weight
of
cubes before
immersion in
kg
Average
weight
of
cubes after
immersion in
kg
Reducti
on
in
weight
%
8.82
8.73
1.02
Average
compressi
ve
strength
before
immersio
n,
N/mm^2
45.78
8.56
8.52
0.47
8.73
8.69
0.46
Average
compressive
strength after
immersion,
N/mm^2
Reductio
n
in
compressi
ve
strength
%
43.55
4.87
41.78
40.0
4.26
38.22
37.33
2.32
Table 5 Reduction in weight and compressive strength of concrete cubes immersed in 3% sodium chloride
solution.
Sr.
No.
1
2
Mix designation
Control mix
22.5%FA+7.5%RHA
by%of cement
20%FA+10%RHA
by% of cement with
using 0.75% steel
fiber
Average
weight of
cubes before
immersion in
kg
Average
weight of
cubes after
immersion in
kg
Reducti
on in
weight
%
8.76
8.62
1.60
Average
compressi
ve
strength
before
immersio
n,
N/mm^2
45.78
8.48
8.40
0.94
8.90
8.88
0.22
IJSER 2012
http://www.ijser.org
Average
compressive
strength after
immersion,
N/mm^2
Reductio
n in
compressi
ve
strength
%
44.0
3.89
41.78
40.89
2.13
38.22
37.78
1.15
5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
4 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the results presented above, the following
conclusions can be drawn:
1 Compressive strength increases with the increase in the
percentage of Fly ash and Rice Husk Ash up to replacement
(22.5%FA and 7.5% RHA) of Cement in Concrete for
different mix proportions.
2 The maximum 28 days split tensile strength was obtained
with 22.5% fly ash 7.5% rice husk ash mix.
3 The maximum 28 days flexural strength was obtained again
with 22.5% fly ash and 7.5% rice husk ash mix.
4
The percentage of water cement ratio is reliant on quantity of
RHA used in concrete. Because RHA is a highly porous
material
5 The workability of concrete had been found to be decrease
with increase RHA in concrete .
6 As the rice husk is burned out at 600 to 800 c. It is observed
that the 80 % silica was produced due to this it gives a
excellent thermal insulation.
7 Through Rice husk ash is harmful for human being and the
cost of rice husk ash is zero and thus we preferred RHA use
in concrete as compare to silica fumes and it is also
economical.
8 The workability of RHA concrete was found to decreased
but the FA increases the workability of concrete.
9 Rice Husk Ash can be used with admixtures, plasticizers,
and super plasticizers, for increasing the workability and
strength of concrete with partial replacement of cement.
10 The mechanical properties in terms of flexural and tensile
strength have been significantly improved with the addition
of RHA.
11 The unit weight of concrete increased uniformly with the
increase in fiber content and decreased with the increase of
rice husk ash content.
12 The inclusion of steel fiber reduces the workability with
increasing fiber content.
13 It is found that the addition of steel fibers into concrete the
small increase in compressive strength with increase in fiber
content after7,14 ,28,56 and 90 days of curing.
14 It is observed that the addition of steel fibers did not improve
the compressive strength in concrete.
15 Steel fibers have showed more significant effects on flexural
and tensile strength at 0.75% by volume fractions.
16 Durability studies carried out in the investigation through
acid attack test and chloride test with 1% H2SO4 and 3%
NaCl revealed that 22.5%FA+7.5%RHA concrete is more
durable in terms of durability factors than control concrete.
17 It is observed that rice husk ash concrete will have higher life
compared to control concrete.
6 REFERENCES
IJSER 2012
http://www.ijser.org
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
IJSER 2012
http://www.ijser.org