Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ISSN 1680-5194
Asian Network for Scientific Information, 2005
Introduction
Malting of cereals is a processing procedure traditionally
used in many African countries for the manufacture of
alcoholic and soft drinks (Taylor, 1983). Malting is a
process involving germination and drying of cereal
seeds, the prime objective being to promote the
development of hydrolytic enzymes that are not active in
raw seeds (Dewar et al., 1997). The methods employed
to improve the nutritional quality and organoleptic
properties of cereal-based foods include genetic
improvement, amino acid fortification, supplementation
or complementation with protein rich sources and
processing technologies which include milling, malting,
fermentation or sprouting (Chavan and Kadam, 1989).
Cereals and legumes are rich in minerals but the
bioavailability of these minerals is usually low due to the
presence of antinutritional factors such as phytate and
polyphenols (Valencia et al., 1999). An adequate mineral
absorption is important especially for infants, children,
elderly people and people in clinical situation (Bergman
et al., 1999). It is evident that the nutritional importance
of a given food/ feed stuff depends not only on nutrient
composition of raw foodstuff but also on the amount
utilized (Vijayakumari et al., 1998). In the Sudan
sorghum comes first in volume of cereals produced and
is the staple food for people in rural areas, particularly
the low-income groups as food or sometimes
processed to produce alcoholic or soft beverages or as
feed for livestock (Brudevold and Southern, 1994). Many
attempts to reduce phytate have been made. It is
reported that phytate is reduced in malted oats by 99%
(Larrson and Sandberg, 1995) and malted pea by 75%
(Beal and Mehta, 1985). Marfo et al. (1990) found that 72
Percent reduction in Phytate* and tannin** content of sorghum flour incubated with malt of different age at different period
of time
Cultivars
Incubation 1st day malt
2nd day malt
4th day malt
period
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(min)
Phytate
Tannin
Phytate
Tannin
Phytate
Tannin
Wad Ahmed
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
30
3.90.15c
2.40.93c
6.40.10c
3.80.19d
9.92.10bc
6.60.59d
60
9.80.02b
4.50.70b
13.10.76bc
8.00.23c
17.84.01b
13.50.92c
90
13.10.52b
7.60.51ab
22.21.80ab
11.80.91b
32.08.40a
19.80.90b
120
17.81.81a
9.740.51a
28.91.77a
16.70.82a
39.96.60a
26.71.66a
Tabat
0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
30
3.80.97cd
2.90.08b
6.10.61d
4.30.80c
8.81.56d
6.20.70d
60
7.00.75bc
3.80.93b
11.51.12c
7.50.21c
17.81.55c
12.41.03bc
90
10.10.41ab
7.60.20a
16.40.60b
13.80.64b
27.61.08b
18.61.59ab
120
15.10.53a
9.40.97a
24.00.81a
18.10.96a
36.60.70a
23.82.19a
Values are means of three replicates SD. Means not sharing a common superscript letter in a column for each cultivar are
significantly different at P ? 0.05 as assessed by Duncans multiple range test. *Phytate content of Wad Ahmed and Tabat cultivars
was 265 and 233 mg/100g respectively. **Tannin content of the cultivars was 0.96 and 0.35% respectively.
Effect of malt pretreatment and incubation for different period of time on major minerals availability (%) of sorghum flour of
two cultivars
Minerals Malt
Cultivar
age
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(days) Wad Ahmed
Tabat
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------Incubation period (min.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------0
30
60
90
120
0
30
60
90
120
Na
1
672.8d
691.9cd
712.3bc
751.5ab
761.8a
640.0c
69 0.5bc 712.1ab
732.7ab
732.4a
2
670.0c
711.3b
741.1b
782.5a
811.6a
651.9c
711.4b
730.8b
760.3a
78 2.3a
4
672.7e
731.5d
761.5c
821.1b
871.1a
651.9e
732.4d
760.6c
812.3b
841.3a
K
1
466.4c
501.3bc
532.4ab
561.6ab
591.8s
510.7d
550.8cd
591.4bc
632.7ab
662.3a
2
471.6d
520.7cd
551.9bc
581.7ab
622.2a
511.5d
571.9c
631.3b
681.8ab
732.0
4
470.8c
520.6c
581.9b
642.1a
701.7a
520.6c
591.6c
632.6b
742.5a
811.8a Ca
1
330.9c
382.9b
411.1b
453.0a
491.9a
351.2e
412.0d
461.6c
512.6b
562.6a
2
341.6e
402.4d
451.4c
522.9b
573.1a
361.4e
421.7d
491.6c
552.9b
611.9a
4
34.6e
431.7d
511.0c
591.8b
672.1a
361.1e
452.3d
541.0c
631.9b
720.7a
Mg
1
460.6e
410.9d
52 0.9c
540.9b
581.5a
551.5e
591.0d
611.0c
641.2b
671.7a
2
46.0e
511.8d
551.4c
591.6b
691.1a
562.2e
591.1d
631.1c
671.7b
701.5a
e
d
c
b
a
e
d
c
b
4
471.1
522.1
581.9
631.8
691.9
562.1
611.9
661.5
711.3
762.9s
P
1
431.4c
463.0c
512.5b
550.9a
581.8a
451.4d
472.7cd
501.5bc
520.7ab
563.3a
2
441.2e
48 2.3d
540.9c
591.8b
641.8a
453.0e
491.3d
531.1c
570.5b
611.1a
4
442.3e
510.8d
601.9c
681.6b
76 3.4a
453.0e
521.6d
591.4c
642.3b
720.9a
Values are mean of three replicates ( SD). Means not sharing a common superscript letter in a row for each cultivar are significantly
different at P < 0.05 as assessed by Duncans multiple range test.
Table 4:
Effect of malt pretreatment and incubation for different period of time on trace minerals availability (%) of sorghum flour of
two cultivars
Minerals
Malt
Cultivar
age
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(days) Wad Ahmed
Tabat
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------Incubation period (min.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------0
30
60
90
120
0
30
60
90
120
Fe
1
4 0.4c
70.2d
90.9c
121.5b
150.5a
60.4e
90.9d
121.3c
151.7b
171.3a
2
41.7e
70.5d
110.8c
141.5b
181.7a
60.5c
100.9b
121.8b
161.7a
19 1.7a
4
4 0.5e
80.7d
121.1c
151.5b
191.6a
70.2d
111.2c
141.6b
181.8a
212.3a
Zn
1
472.0d
511.5c
55 2.4b
581.7a
621.9a
543.8d
611.2c
641.1bc
681.9ab
721.3a
2
480.9e
520.5d
572.3c
632.1b
690.9a
541.8d
621.4c
671.7bc
701.8ab
751.7a
4
481.5e
551.8d
621.1c
681.9b
75 1.4a
542.1d
642.3c
70.1.7b
761.9b
811.5a
Mn
1
411.9d
441.3d
462.4c
493.2ab
512.6a
462.5c
492.3bc
510.5ab
532.4a
551.9a
2
420.4e
461.9d
501.1c
551.9b
591.8a
462.5e
510.9d
54 1.1c
581.6b
622.1a
4
410.9e
481.5d
561.8c
611.0b
702.2a
462.1d
552.4d
611.6c
671.7b
742.2a
a
a
a
a
a
c
bc
abc
ab
Co
1
674.7
692.1
701.8
723.4
731.2
720.3
752.0
771.8
801.6
811.7a
2
674.7c
701.8bc
742.4abc
762.0ab
791.7a
730.5d
750.8cd
781.9bc
822.2ab
851.1a
4
672.2c
733.4bc
7706b
802.1ab
851.8a
73 0.5c
773.1c
841.1b
881.9ab
933.1a
Cu
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Values are mean of three replicates SD. Means not sharing a common superscript letter in a row for each cultivar are significantly
different at P < 0.05 as assessed by Duncans multiple range test.
improved. Further they reported that higher HClextractability of minerals may be partly ascribed to the
decreased content of phytic acid, as a significant
negative correlation between the phytic acid and HClextractability of dietary essential minerals was obtained.
Malt pretreatment of the flour greatly affects and
extractability of trace minerals (Table 4). Trace minerals
content increased significantly (P = 0.05) when the flour
of the cultivars pretreated with 1% malt (data not shown).
References
AOAC, 1984 Official methods of analysis. (14th ed.).
Association of Official Analytical Chemists:
Washington, DC.
Barrier, G.B., P. Casado, C. Jondreville, F. Gatel and
M.R. Larbier, 1996. Wheat phosphorus availability:
In vivo study in broiler and pigs; relationship with
indigenous phytase activity and phytic phosphorus
content in wheat. J. Sci. Food Agri., 70: 69-74.
Beal, L. and T. Mehta, 1985. Zinc and phytate distribution
in peas. Influence of heat treatment, germination,
pH, substrate and phosphorus on pea phytate and
phytase. J. Food Sci., 50: 96-100.
Bergman, E.L., K. Fredhund, P. Reinikainent and A.S.
Sandberg, 1999. Hydrothermal processing of barley
(cv. Blenheim): Optimization of phytate degradation
and increase of free myo-inositol. J. Cereal Sci., 29:
261-271.
Bhise, V.J., J.K. Chavan and S.S. Kadam, 1988. Effect of
malting on proximate composition and in vitro
protein and starch digestibilities of grain sorghum.
J. Food Sci. Tec., 25: 327-329.
Brudevold, A.B. and L.L. Southern, 1994. Low protein
crystalline amino acidsupplemented, sorghumsoybean meal diet for the 10 to 20 Kilogram pig. J.
Anim. Sci., 72: 635-641.
Chapman, H.D. and F.P. Pratt, 1982. Determination of
minerals by titration method. Methods of Analysis for
Soils, Plants and Water, 2nd edn, California
University, Agriculture Division, U.S.A., pp: 169-170.
Chapman, H.D. and F.P. Pratt, 1961. Ammonium
vandate-molybdate method for determination of
phosphorus. Methods of Analysis for Soils, Plants
and Water, 1st edn, California University. Agriculture
Division, U.S.A., pp: 184-203.
400
401