But no, I think you are taking all this too seriously.
Probably even the Hindu Extremists look
dangerous from where you stand. Anyhow my take is you are not doing justice to the immense effort these researchers make doing hard research and after that writing abstracts and stating their hypothesis and rationale for it upfront. Studded with a lot of easy to understand graphics for the enthusiasts to follow or for interested people to understand. Moorjani even stated a para with - "It is also important to emphasize what our study has not shown", imply that they even caution what should not be understood from it. Arre bhai sab kuch to kar diya ab kya bache ki jaan loge. You are not dealing with idiots when they say ANI/ASI. People on the thread merely picked up what was said by researchers. If you believe they picked out of context then establish context. Simple only. Instead you have complained about small number of Individuals. I mean, come on, they are studying several genetic loci because it is a study of genes and not of individuals. An individual can have several different genetic locus and what the 'differences' that they state is merely a reasonable part of the bulk of these. This is just the like the way I do not need to understand Computational Fluid Dynamics to understand why things fly or why the kite takes a jhonk or why the wing will also produce skin drag and the generally expected demands on different types of wings. But then you are denying even the paper of 2009 which was relevant for identifying ANI and ASI. What to say of the later paper regarding latest admixture events. And all this when the earliest admixture event is yet to be even researched. Anyhow remember before you dismiss all these studies, some of these have indicated some relevance for genetic conditions also that are linked to the basic hypothesis that are used in these papers. I remember Reich talked about recessive genetic conditions that are not linked to the usually suspected inbreeding but instead are linked to the founder event and small sizes of populations at that time. Are the researchers that work on genetic conditions also denying these hypothesis? Added later - http://www.natureasia.com/en/nindia/article/10.1038/nindia.2013.116 [QUOTE]Some groups like the Vysya from Andhra Pradesh have not experienced any gene flow from outside their group for about 3000 years. Such situations lead to inbreeding which lead to population specific diseases. One such example is the"inability of digesting anesthesia during surgical procedures by the Vysyas", Thangaraj explains. [/QUOTE] Now should researchers also ignore these kind of observations that are also part and parcel of the conclusions.
The Ultimate Irrefutable and Undeniable Proofs in Science and Many Other Areas of Study That Completely Destroys Atheism and Proves That God Exists and That Christianity Is True