Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
vtc@vtcmag.com
Figure 1. Baceteriophage M13 biofilm. (a) Bacteriophage M13 structure. (b) One explanation for the origin of the piezoelectric effect. (c) Alternate explanation for the piezoelectric effect. [Credit: Yu, S.M. 2012 (2)].
explanation is that compressing the virus from above (blue arrow) causes neighboring protein helices to rub against each other
(purple arrows), resulting in deformation of the helical structure
(green arrows) and the development of new electric dipole moments, as shown in Figure 1b. Another explanation is shown in
Figure 1c, where although the virus is symmetrical in the radial
direction, compressive pressure could break the symmetry and
produce new charges on the top and bottom surfaces of the virus.
The piezoelectric effect of bactetiophage M13 has been further
enhanced by genetically engineering the viral capsid protein to
include four negatively charged glutamate residues on the end of
the protein which results in an even more negative charge on one
end of the protein. This increases the charge difference between
the positive and negative ends of the protein, increasing the voltage of the M13 capsid. Stacking about 20 single layer M13 biofilms on top of each other in the device also enhanced the system.
Such a multilayer thin film protein structure is advantageous as it
exhibits enhanced functionality.
Although the electricity generated in this first device is only
about one-fourth the energy generated from a AAA battery, these
M13 thin films open up the possibility that in the future LED
screens could be powered by trillions of tiny viruses that can
convert vibrations into electricity. This first piezoelectric device
holds promise for viral electronics, including consumer electronics or sensors that can convert vibrations or pressure to electricity to charge themselves. In the future, this technology could be
incorporated in shoes, doors, and even carpets to generate small
amounts of electricity.
Figure 2. Genetically engineered viral capsid protein for magnetic resonance imaging. Thin films of M13 phage (yellow), SPARC binding
peptide (pink), Triglutamate motif allows for the assembly iron oxide
nanocrystals (black) along the surface of the viral coat. [Credit: Ghosh,
D. et al 2012 (3)].
es. These viruses infect and multiply within malignant cells and
then lyse the cancer cells without affecting normal cells. This
property of oncolytic viruses is either inherent or genetically engineered. Several types of oncolytic viruses have been developed
as therapeutic agents. One such virus is adenovirus, which is approximately 70 to 90 nanometers in size. Several modifications
of this virus have been tested in clinical trials for head and neck
cancers. One modified adenovirus based product, H101, has already been approved for use in China. Another oncolytic virus,
coxsackie virus, is currently in clinical trials for the treatment
of malignant melanomas. Engineered versions of poliovirus are
also being tested for oncolytic potential against glioblastoma
multiforme, which are the most aggressive malignant brain tumors in humans. One of the more promising oncolytic viruses
is reovirus, which is a virus with no known associated disease in
humans and is named reo which is short for respiratory enteric
orphan virus. Exposure to reovirus is common in humans and
most humans have been infected with this virus at some point
during their lives. Reovirus particles are 60 to 90 nanometers in
diameter and the virus replicates in cells that have an activated
Ras pathway, which is a common mutation in cancer cells, while
leaving normal cells unaffected. Approximately 1/3 of human
cancers have mutations in the Ras gene and approximately 2/3
of cancers may have an activated Ras signaling pathway due to
other activating mutations in the signaling pathway. When reovirus was tested in combination with chemotherapies, there were
enhanced effects, possibly due to enhanced ability of the virus to
spread from cell to cell due to the chemotherapeutic agent used.
Reovirus has shown promising results in Phase I and Phase II
clinical trials and provides hope for patients with aggressive untreatable cancers.
Cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) has also been used to detect invasive forms of cancer. In one such report, Cowpea mosaic virus
nanoparticles in homogeneous thin film form have been shown
to interact with vimetin, a type III intermediate filament which
is overexpressed in a number of cancers like breast, prostrate,
and colon cancer, as well as osteosarcomas (6). Vimetin plays a
major role in epithelial mesenchymal transitions which is a sign
of tumor invasiveness and aggression. In tumor metastasis vimetin plays a key role in cell adhesion in migrating cells. Apart
from being cytosolic, vimetin has been found to be exposed on
the surface or secreted outside of activated macrophages. CPMV
particles can be attached with fluorescent labels and can be given
to patients in the form of an intravenous injection. These particles
can then bind to vimetin on the surface of tumor cells. One advantage of using plant CPMV particles is that they can be cleared
rapidly from the circulation without any toxicity or pathological
effects. It has been shown that fluorescently labelled CPMV particles can be internalized by endothelial cells in vivo, a process
which is mediated by vimentin that is expressed on the surface of
cancer cells (6). This leads to state-of-the-art vacuum technology
based high resolution imaging of the vasculature, which is especially useful in the case of tumors.
In addition to developing CPMV for imaging vasculature and
cancers, this virus is also being developed as a viral protein expression system to allow for high levels of protein expression in
vtc@vtcmag.com
References
1. Virus-based piezoelectric energy generation. Lee BY, Zhang J, Zueger C, Chung W-J, You SY, Wang E, Meyer J, Ramesh R, and Lee
S-W. Nature Nanotechnology (2012), 7: 351-356.
2. Piezoelectric devices: Squeezed virus produces electricity. Yu, S.M.
Nature Nanotechnology (2012), 7: 343-344.
3. M13-templated magnetic nanoparticles for targeted in vivo imaging
of prostate cancer. Ghosh D, Lee Y, Thomas S, Kohli AG, Yun DS,
Belcher AM, Kelly KA. Nature nanotechnology (2012), 7, 677-682.
4. Global phage diversity. Rohwer F. Cell (2003), 113(2):141.
5. Propionibacterium acnes bacteriophages display limited genetic
diversity and broad killing activity against bacterial skin isolates.
Marinelli LJ, Fitz-Gibbon S, Hayes C, Bowman C, Inkeles M, Loncaric A, Russell DA, Jacobs-Sera D, Cokus S, Pellegrini M, Kim J,
Miller JF, Hatfull GF, Modlin RL. mBio (2012), 3(5):e00279-12.
doi:10.1128/mBio.00279-12.
6. Cowpea mosaic virus nanoparticles target surface vimentin on cancer cells. Steinmetz NF, Cho CF, Ablack A, Lewis JD, Manchester
M. Nanomedicine (2011), 6(2), 351-364.
7. Systemic trafficking of plant virus nanoparticles in mice via the oral
route. Rae CS, Khor IW, Wang Q, Destito G, Gonzalez MJ, Singh
P, Thomas DM, Estrada MN, Powell E, Finn MG, Manchester M.
Virology (2005), 343 (2): 224-235.
8. Plant-derived pharmaceuticals for the developing world. Hefferon,
K. Biotechnology J. (2013), 8, 1193-1202.
9.
Phage and Phage Therapy website: <http://www.evergreen.edu/
phage/>