Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Never fail to explain before the court why nothing was filed
after the extension expires since such would show discourtesy
to the court
AUTHORITY OF LAWYER
A. IN GENERAL
1. POWER TO BIND THE CLIENT: The professional employment
of an attorney confers upon him to do on behalf of his client such
acts as are necessary or incidental to the prosecution or
management of the suit entrusted to him or the accomplishment of
the purpose for which he was retained
2. ATTORNEY AS CLIENTS AGENT: Outside the court, the
ordinary agent test applies; Inside the court, officer of the court test
applies
3. COLLECTION OF CLAIMS: The authority to collect does not
include the authority to lower the amount, condone the debt,
unilaterally appropriate the amount collected, etc.
4. ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS: Authority to
accept summons not necessarily implied in ACR
5. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY: Never delegate to another
lawyer tasks entrusted by the client unless the latter gave consent
or ratified such delegation
6. DELEGATION OF LEGAL WORK: In law firms or partnerships,
the legal work may be delegated to the associated since the logic
here is that the FIRM was the one hired to represent the client
B. AUTHORITY TO APPEAR
1. WHAT IS APPEARANCE: Appearance refers to the lawyers
appearance in court in behalf of the client asking relief from such,
binding upon the clients retention or the courts authorization
(voluntary submission to courts jurisdiction)
2. TYPES OF APPEARANCE: General (implies voluntary
submission to courts jurisdiction) and Special (appearance solely to
contest the courts jurisdiction over the client/ matter)
3. PRESUMPTION OF AUTHORITY TO APPEAR: A lawyer is
presumed to hav the authority to appear but this may be
challenged by the adverse party or the purported client himself
4. DISCLOSURE OF AUTHORITY: Once the authority to appear is
challenge, the court may require the attorney to prove his authority
to appear by presenting evidence indicating the existence of the
ACR/retainer
procedural
questions,
admissions,
stipulations, etc. )
D. MATTERS PERTAINING TO CLIENT
1. KNOWLEDGE ACQUIRED BY LAWYER: See R15.02, Canon 21
2. NOTICE, ITS EFFECTS AND MODES OF SERVICE: Notice to
counsel on record is notice to client unless:
a. There are 2 lawyers and there is an agreement that only one
of them is to receive said notice
b. There is the danger of collusion
c. The accused/litigant has no counsel
d. The court exercised discretion to serve notice on the litigant
Notice is usually served by mail or by personal delivery to the
counsels office
3. MISTAKE OF COUNSEL BINDING UPON THE CLIENT:
Generally, mistake of the attorney binds the client as regards to
procedural matters
4. EXCEPTIONS TO THE MISTAKE AS BINDING RULE: The
general rule does not apply if the negligence is so gross that the
client is deprived of due process
VIII.
COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEY
CANON 20:
A LAWYER SHALL CHARGE ONLY FAIR AND
REASONABLE FEES
- Although the profession is not a business, it is only fair that the lawyer be
compensated for services rendered to a client and the court will protect
the lawyer from clients who will attempt to defraud him
- Attorneys fees will not accrue unless there exists an ATTORNEY-CLIENT
RELATIONSHIP:
1. RETAINER/EXPRESS CONTRACT: The contract for professional
services may be written or oral (general retainer: secure future
services/ special retainer: for actual services rendered) and
general provisions of the contract laws (1305-1422 of NCC)
applies concerning its validity
2. CONTINGENT FEE CONTRACT: agreement in writing wherein
the fee, usually a fixed percentage of what may be recovered
by the action, is made to depend upon the success in enforcing
the clients rights. To be valid, it should be written, not violative
any provisions of the law concerning contracts and the fee
should not be unconscionable.
NB: Contracts regarding professional legal services are to be
construed in favor of the client (De los Santos Vs. Palanca) and
the Court will only interfere when said contracts violate the law
or cause injustice to the client
3. QUANTUM MERUIT: The court will fix the attorneys
compensation depending upon the nature, quantity and quality
of the services he rendered, which benefited the client, if:
a. There is no agreement as to legal fees
b. The amount stipulated is unconscionable
c. Client rejects the amount as unconscionable
d. The contract is invalid for some other reason
e. Lawyer failed to complete the litigation w/o fault
- Only lawyers who actually rendered service may share in the fees
(agreement/ proportion), from the time they were hired to the time of their
discharge by the client or upon termination of the litigation (REFUND
WHAT WAS NEVER EARNED)
- Liability for attorneys fees:
1. Client who retains counsels services
2. Those who benefited from the services (extent of benefit)
3. Assignee
4. Labor cases: union and non-union members who benefit
5. Derivative suits: all stockholders or company funds liable
6. Receivership proceedings: assets under receivership
7. Trusteeship/guardianship: trust estate/ wards property
8. Estate proceedings: estates assets (depending on its net
worth) prior to distribution and the heirs in proportion to their
shares, if the assets have been partitioned already
- Clients can not use their prerogative to terminate the ACR for the
purpose of defrauding the lawyer and to deprive him of his rightful fees
RULE 20.01: A LAWYER SHALL BE GUIDED BY THE
FOLLOWING FACTORS IN DETERMINING HIS FEES:
a) THE TIME SPENT AND EXTENT OF SERVICES
RENDERED OR REQUIRED
b) NOVELTY AND DIFFICULTY OF THE QUESTIONS
INVOLVED
c) IMPORTANCE OF THE SUBJECT MATTER
d) SKILL DEMANDED
e) PROBABILITY OF LOSING ANOTHER EMPLOYMENT
f) CUSTOMARY IBP CHARGES
g) AMOUNT INVOLVED OR BENEFITS RESULTING TO
CLIENT
h) CONTINGENCY OR CERTAINTY OF COMPENSATION
i)
CHARACTER
OR
EMPLOYMENT
(occasional/established)
J) PROFESSIONAL STANDING OF LAWYER
Other factors that may be considered: Test case, Capacity of
client to pay, statutory limits, etc.
RULE 20.02: A LAWYER SHALL, IN CASES OF REFERRAL,
WITH THE CONSENT OF THE CLIENT, BE ENTITLED TO A
DIVISION OF FEES IN PROPORTION TO THE WORK
PERFORMED AND THE BENEFITS ASSUMED
Referral here contemplates that there was some form of
additional service/ responsibility assumed by another counsel
IX.
TERMINATION OF SERVICES
OR
THE
FACILITATE
THE
PERFORMANCE
OF
ADMINISTRATIVE
FUNCTIONS
Never blame the staff for administrative glitches
Take care of court records, equipment, etc.
RULE 3.09: A JUDGE SHOULD ORGANIZE AND SUPERVISE
COURT PERSONNEL TO ENSURE THE PROMPT AND EFFICIENT
DISPATCH OF BUSINESS
Efficient manner of recording and filing cases, etc.
RULE 3.10: A JUDGE SHOULD TAKE OR INITIATE
APPROPRIATE DISCIPLINARY MEASURES AGAINST LAWYERS
OR COURT PERSONNEL FOR UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
RULE 3.11: A JUDGE SHOULD EXERCISE APPOINTING
POWERS STRICTLY ON THE BASIS OF MERIT AND
QUALIFICATIONS
(DISQUALIFICATIONS)
RULE 3.12: A JUDGE SHOULD TAKE NO PART IN THE
PROCEEDINGS WHEREIN HIS IMPARTIALITY MAY BE
QUESTONED, INCLUDING:
a) PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF EVIDENTIARY FACTS
b) INTERVENTION AS LITIGANT, COUNSEL OR WITNESS
c) LOWER COURT RULING IS BEING REVIEWED
d) RELATIONSHIP BY CONSAGUINITY OR AFFINITY
(LITIGANT 6 DEG; COUNSEL 4 DEG)
e) SPOUSE OR CHILD HAS FINANCIAL INTEREST/BENEFIT
IN EVERY INSTANCE, THE JUDGE SHALL STATE THE LEGAL
REASON FOR INHIBITION
Compulsory inhibition (Rule 137, sec. 1) b,c,d,e
Voluntary inhibition (Rule 137, sec. 2) judge may exercise
discretion after ascertaining WON his impartiality will be
questioned
(REMITTAL OF DISQUALIFICATION)
RULE 3.13: A JUDGE, INSTEAD OF WITHDRAWING, MAY
SIMPLE DISCLOSE THE INHIBITION ON RECORD AND MAY
PARTICIPATE IF ALL PARTIES AND THEIR LAWYERS AGREE IN
WRITING THAT THE INHIBITION IS IMMATERIAL
CANON 4: A JUDGE MAY, WITH DUE REGARD TO OFFICIAL DUTIES,
ENGAGE IN ACTIVITIES TO IMPROVE THE LAW AND THE JUSTICE
SYSTEM
RULE 4.01: A JUDGE MAY, IF NOT DOUBT IS CAST UPON HIS
IMPARTIALITY,
a) TEACH, WRITE OR LECTURE ON LAW AND THE LEGAL
SYSTEM
b) APPEAR AT PUBLIC LEGISLATIVE OR EXECUTIVE
HEARING REGARDING MATTERS CONCERNING THE LAW
AND THE JUSTICE SYSTEM
FULL
FINANCIAL
DISMISSAL OF JUDGES
A. GENERAL RULE: JUDGES ARE NOT LIABLE FOR ACTS DONE IN
THE EXERCISE OF JUDICIAL FUNCTIONS
- Public officials like judges enjoy the PRESUMPTION OF PROPER
DISCHARGE OF OFFICIAL DUTIES unless there is satisfactory evidence that
shows the judge was guilty of fraud, gross negligence, dishonesty,
corruption or bad faith
B. JUDICIAL REMEDIES BEFORE FILING ADMINISTRATIVE CASE
- Exhaust the available judicial remedies to rectify an allegedly erroneous
decision before filing an administrative case vs. the judge
C. PROCEDURE FOR DISCIPLINE AND DISCIPLINARY ACTION
- Steps to take (impeachment or judges are penal in nature):
1. File complaint with the SC in writing, laying down the facts and
the charges vs. the judge (sworn and supported by affidavits)
2. Respondent judge will be sent a SHOW-CAUSE notice from the SC
3. SC will dismiss charges if such are not meritorious but when the
facts of the record show liability, judge will be sanctioned (RES IPSA
LOQUITUR facts are admitted or on its face show culpability
without satisfactory explanation)
4. Quantum of evidence: BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT
D. REINSTATEMENT
- Depends on the circumstances but the basic tenet is that HE HAD NO
BAD FAITH OR ANY RECORD OF SUCH