Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Article Talk
Search
"Hard drive" redirects here. For other uses, see Hard drive (disambiguation).
A hard disk drive (HDD), hard disk, hard drive or
fixed
disk[b]
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Invented by
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
open in browser PRO version
pdfcrowd.com
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Afrikaans
Alemannisch
Aragons
Azrbaycanca
()
time it takes for the desired sector to move under the head
Bosanski
(average latency, which is a function of the physical rotational speed in revolutions per minute),
and finally the speed at which the data is transmitted (data rate).
Brezhoneg
The two most common form factors for modern HDDs are 3.5-inch, for desktop computers, and
Catal
2.5-inch, primarily for laptops. HDDs are connected to systems by standard interface cables such
etina
Cymraeg
As of 2015, the primary competing technology for secondary storage is flash memory in the form of
Dansk
solid-state drives (SSDs), which have higher data transfer rates and significantly lower latency and
Deutsch
access times, but HDDs remain the dominant medium for secondary storage due to advantages in
Eesti
price per unit of storage and recording capacity.[5][6] However, SSDs are replacing HDDs where
pdfcrowd.com
Espaol
Esperanto
Euskara
Franais
Frysk
Furlan
2.2 Components
Gaeilge
Galego
Hrvatski
Bahasa Indonesia
Interlingua
slenska
Italiano
3 Capacity
3.1 Calculation
3.2 System use
3.3 Units
4 Form factors
5 Performance characteristics
Basa Jawa
5.3 Latency
Kiswahili
Latina
Latvieu
Lietuvi
Limburgs
11 Visual representation
Lingla
12 See also
Lumbaart
13 Notes
pdfcrowd.com
Magyar
14 References
15 Further reading
Malagasy
16 External links
Bahasa Melayu
Nederlands
History
[edit]
Norsk bokml
Norsk nynorsk
Occitan
Ozbekcha/
50 disks.
Video of modern HDD operation
(cover removed)
Plattdtsch
Polski
Portugus
Romn
Parameter
Capacity
(formatted)
Shqip
Physical
Sicilianu
volume
Simple English
Slovenina
Slovenina
open in browser PRO version
Weight
Started with
Developed to
Improvement
two-million-to-
3.75 megabytes[9]
eight terabytes
57,000-to-one
15,000-to-one
Average
Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
one
about
pdfcrowd.com
Slovenina
Average
access time
/ srpski
Srpskohrvatski /
Price
Suomi
Areal density
Svenska
about
a few milliseconds
US$9,200 per
180-million-to-
megabyte[11][dubious discuss]
2013[12]
one
> 400-million-
in 2014[14]
to-one
Tagalog
200-to-one
buy additional packs and interchange them as needed, much like reels of magnetic tape. Later
Taqbaylit
models of removable pack drives, from IBM and others, became the norm in most computer
/tatara
installations and reached capacities of 300 megabytes by the early 1980s. Non-removable HDDs
Some high-performance HDDs were manufactured with one head per track (e.g. IBM 2305) so that
Trke
no time was lost physically moving the heads to a track.[15] Known as fixed-head or head-per-track
disk drives they were very expensive and are no longer in production.[16]
Vneto
In 1973, IBM introduced a new type of HDD codenamed "Winchester". Its primary distinguishing
Ting Vit
feature was that the disk heads were not withdrawn completely from the stack of disk platters when
Winaray
the drive was powered down. Instead, the heads were allowed to "land" on a special area of the
disk surface upon spin-down, "taking off" again when the disk was later powered on. This greatly
reduced the cost of the head actuator mechanism, but precluded removing just the disks from the
Zazaki
emaitka
drive as was done with the disk packs of the day. Instead, the first models of "Winchester
technology" drives featured a removable disk module, which included both the disk pack and the
Edit links
head assembly, leaving the actuator motor in the drive upon removal. Later "Winchester" drives
abandoned the removable media concept and returned to non-removable platters.
Like the first removable pack drive, the first "Winchester" drives used platters 14 inches (360 mm)
in diameter. A few years later, designers were exploring the possibility that physically smaller
pdfcrowd.com
platters might offer advantages. Drives with non-removable eight-inch platters appeared, and then
drives that used a 514 in (130 mm) form factor (a mounting width equivalent to that used by
contemporary floppy disk drives). The latter were primarily intended for the then-fledgling personal
computer (PC) market.
As the 1980s began, HDDs were a rare and very expensive additional feature in PCs, but by the
late 1980s their cost had been reduced to the point where they were standard on all but the
cheapest computers.
Most HDDs in the early 1980s were sold to PC end users as an external, add-on subsystem. The
subsystem was not sold under the drive manufacturer's name but under the subsystem
manufacturer's name such as Corvus Systems and Tallgrass Technologies, or under the PC
system manufacturer's name such as the Apple ProFile. The IBM PC/XT in 1983 included an
internal 10 MB HDD, and soon thereafter internal HDDs proliferated on personal computers.
External HDDs remained popular for much longer on the Apple Macintosh. Every Macintosh made
between 1986 and 1998 had a SCSI port on the back, making external expansion simple; also,
older compact Macintosh computers did not have easily accessible hard drive bays (or in the case
of the Macintosh 128K, Macintosh 512K, and Macintosh Plus, any hard drive bay at all), so on
those models external SCSI disks were the only reasonable option.
The 2011 Thailand floods damaged manufacturing plants, and impacted hard disk drive cost
adversely in 20112013.[17]
Driven by ever increasing areal density since their invention, HDDs have continuously improved
their characteristics; a few highlights are listed in the table above. At the same time, market
application expanded from mainframe computers of the late 1950s to most mass storage
applications including computers and consumer applications such as storage of entertainment
content.
open in browser PRO version
pdfcrowd.com
Technology
[edit]
Magnetic recording
[edit]
pdfcrowd.com
high-performance
servers.[24] The
first HDDs spun at
1,200 rpm[3] and, for many years, 3,600 rpm was the
norm.[25] As of December 2013, the platters in most
pdfcrowd.com
parallel magnetic layers, separated by a 3-atom layer of the non-magnetic element ruthenium, and
the two layers are magnetized in opposite orientation, thus reinforcing each other.[26] Another
technology used to overcome thermal effects to allow greater recording densities is perpendicular
recording, first shipped in 2005,[27] and as of 2007 the technology was used in many
HDDs.[28][29][30]
Components
[edit]
pdfcrowd.com
pdfcrowd.com
[edit]
Modern drives make extensive use of error correction codes (ECCs), particularly ReedSolomon
error correction. These techniques store extra bits, determined by mathematical formulas, for each
block of data; the extra bits allow many errors to be corrected invisibly. The extra bits themselves
take up space on the HDD, but allow higher recording densities to be employed without causing
uncorrectable errors, resulting in much larger storage capacity.[31] For example, a typical 1 TB
hard disk with 512-byte sectors provides additional capacity of about 93 GB for the ECC data.[32]
In the newest drives, as of 2009, low-density parity-check codes (LDPC) were supplanting ReedSolomon; LDPC codes enable performance close to the Shannon Limit and thus provide the
highest storage density available.[33]
Typical hard disk drives attempt to "remap" the data in a physical sector that is failing to a spare
physical sector provided by the drive's "spare sector pool" (also called "reserve pool"),[34] while
relying on the ECC to recover stored data while the amount of errors in a bad sector is still low
enough. The S.M.A.R.T (Self-Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology) feature counts the
total number of errors in the entire HDD fixed by ECC (although not on all hard drives as the
related S.M.A.R.T attributes "Hardware ECC Recovered" and "Soft ECC Correction" are not
consistently supported), and the total number of performed sector remappings, as the occurrence
of many such errors may predict an HDD failure.
The "No-ID Format", developed by IBM in the mid-1990s, contains information about which sectors
are bad and where remapped sectors have been located.[35]
Only a tiny fraction of the detected errors ends up as not correctable. For example, specification
for an enterprise SAS disk (a model from 2013) estimates this fraction to be one uncorrected error
in every 1016 bits,[36] and another SAS enterprise disk from 2013 specifies similar error rates.[37]
Another modern (as of 2013) enterprise SATA disk specifies an error rate of less than 10 nonopen in browser PRO version
pdfcrowd.com
recoverable read errors in every 1016 bits.[38] An enterprise disk with a Fibre Channel interface,
which uses 520 byte sectors to support the Data Integrity Field standard to combat data
corruption, specifies similar error rates in 2005.[39]
The worst type of errors are those that go unnoticed, and are not even detected by the disk
firmware or the host operating system. These errors are known as silent data corruption, some of
which may be caused by hard disk drive malfunctions.[40]
Future development
[edit]
cost per byte improved nearly -45% per year during 1990
2010, and slowed after 2010 due to the Thailand floods
and difficulty in migrating from perpendicular recording to newer technologies.[45][46][47] Moore
(2005) further observed that growth cannot continue forever.[48]
Increasing areal density corresponds to an ever decreasing bit cell size. In 2013, a production
desktop 3 TB HDD (with four platters) would have had an areal density of about 500 Gbit/in2 which
would have amounted to a bit cell comprising about 18 magnetic grains (11 by 1.6 grains).[49]
Since the mid-2000s areal density progress has increasingly been challenged by a
open in browser PRO version
pdfcrowd.com
superparamagnetic trilemma involving grain size, grain magnetic strength and ability of the head to
write.[50] In order to maintain acceptable signal to noise smaller grains are required; smaller grains
may self-reverse (thermal instability) unless their magnetic strength is increased, but known write
head materials are unable to generate a magnetic field sufficient to write the medium. Several new
magnetic storage technologies are being developed to overcome or at least abate this trilemma
and thereby maintain the competitiveness of HDDs with respect to products such as flash memorybased solid-state drives (SSDs).
In 2013, Seagate introduced one such technology, shingled magnetic recording (SMR).[51]
Additionally, SMR comes with design complexities that may cause reduced write
performance.[52][53] Other new recording technologies that, as of 2015, still remain under
development include heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR),[54][55] microwave-assisted
magnetic recording (MAMR),[56] two-dimensional magnetic recording (TDMR),[49][57] bit-patterned
recording (BPR),[58] and "current perpendicular to plane" giant magnetoresistance (CPP/GMR)
heads.[59][60][61]
Depending upon assumptions on feasibility and timing of these technologies, the median forecast
by industry observers and analysts for 2016 and beyond for areal density growth is 20% per year
with a range of 10% to 40%.[49][62][63][64][65] The ultimate limit for the BPR technology may be the
superparamagnetic limit of a single particle that is estimated to be about two orders of magnitude
higher than the 500 Gbits/in2 density represented by 2013 production desktop HDDs.[49]
Capacity
[edit]
The capacity of a hard disk drive, as reported by an operating system to the end user, is smaller
than the amount stated by a drive or system manufacturer; this can be caused by a combination of
factors: the operating system using some space, different units used while calculating capacity, or
open in browser PRO version
pdfcrowd.com
data redundancy.
Calculation
[edit]
Modern hard disk drives appear to their interface as a contiguous set of logical blocks, so the
gross drive capacity may be calculated by multiplying the number of blocks by the block size. This
information is available from the manufacturer's specification and from the drive itself through use
of special utilities invoking low level commands.[66][67]
The gross capacity of older HDDs may be calculated as the product of the number of cylinders per
zone, the number of bytes per sector (most commonly 512), and the count of zones of the drive.
Some modern SATA drives also report cylinder-head-sector (CHS) values, but these are not actual
physical parameters since the reported numbers are constrained by historic operating system
interfaces. The C/H/S scheme has been replaced by logical block addressing. In some cases, to
try to "force-fit" the CHS scheme to large-capacity drives, the number of heads was given as 64,
although no modern drive has anywhere near 32 platters: the typical 2 TB hard disk as of 2013
has two 1 TB platters, and 4 TB drives use four platters.
In modern HDDs, spare capacity for defect management is not included in the published capacity;
however, in many early HDDs a certain number of sectors were reserved as spares, thereby
reducing the capacity available to end users.
For RAID subsystems, data integrity and fault-tolerance requirements also reduce the realized
capacity. For example, a RAID1 subsystem will be about half the total capacity as a result of data
mirroring. RAID5 subsystems with x drives, would lose 1/x of capacity to parity. RAID subsystems
are multiple drives that appear to be one drive or more drives to the user, but provides a great
deal of fault-tolerance. Most RAID vendors use some form of checksums to improve data integrity
at the block level. For many vendors, this involves using HDDs with sectors of 520 bytes per sector
to contain 512 bytes of user data and eight checksum bytes or using separate 512-byte sectors
open in browser PRO version
pdfcrowd.com
to contain 512 bytes of user data and eight checksum bytes or using separate 512-byte sectors
for the checksum data.[68]
In some systems, there may be hidden partitions used for system recovery that reduce the
capacity available to the end user.
System use
[edit]
Units
[edit]
pdfcrowd.com
The
total
Capacity advertised by
Capacity expected by
manufacturers[g]
consumers[h]
With
prefix
100 GB
Bytes
100,000,000,000
Bytes
Diff.
107,374,182,400 7.37%
Reported capacity
Windows[h]
Mac OS X
10.6+[g]
93.1 GB,
100 GB
95,367 MB
931 GB,
1,000 GB,
953,674 MB 1,000,000 MB
pdfcrowd.com
use of decimal prefixes effectively misled consumers while the defendants denied any wrongdoing
or liability, asserting that their marketing and advertising complied in all respects with the law and
that no class member sustained any damages or injuries.[84][85][86]
Form factors
[edit]
Status
Length Width
[mm]
[mm]
Height
Largest
Platters
Per
[mm]
capacity
(max)
platter
[GB]
3.5-inch
Current
146
101.6
19 or 25.4
5,[89] 7,
2.5-inch
Current
100
69.85
9.5,[k]
12.5,
15, or 19[90]
78.5[l]
1.8-inch
Current
8-inch
Obsolete 362
5.25-inch FH
5.25-inch HH
Obsolete 203
Obsolete 203
54
5 or 8
241.3
117.5
146
146
82.6
41.4
8
TB[87](2014)
2 TB[91]
(2012)
320 GB[10]
(2009)
47 GB[94]
(1998)
19.3 GB[95]
(1998)
5 or 7[88][j] 1149[87]
667[92]
220
14
3.36
4[m]
4.83
[93]
40 GB[96]
open in browser PRO version
pdfcrowd.com
1.3-inch
Obsolete
43
Obsolete
42
40 GB
(2007)
1-inch
(CFII/ZIF/IDE-
20 GB
(2006)
Flex)
0.85-inch
Obsolete 32
24
8 GB[97][98]
(2004)
40
20
IBM's first hard drive, the IBM 350, used a stack of fifty 24inch platters and was of a size comparable to two large
refrigerators. In 1962, IBM introduced its model 1311 disk,
which used six 14-inch (nominal size) platters in a
removable pack and was roughly the size of a washing
machine. This became a standard platter size and drive
form-factor for many years, used also by other
manufacturers.[99] The IBM 2314 used platters of the same
size in an eleven-high pack and introduced the "drive in a
drawer" layout, although the "drawer" was not the complete
drive.
pdfcrowd.com
pdfcrowd.com
5.25 inch devices (optical drives, etc.)[101] The Quantum Bigfoot HDD was the last to use it in
the late 1990s, with "low-profile" (25 mm) and "ultra-low-profile" (20 mm) high versions.
3.5-inch
4 in 1 in 5.75 in (101.6 mm 25.4 mm 146 mm) = 376.77344 cm. This smaller form
factor is similar to that used in an HDD by Rodime in 1983,[102] which was the same size as the
"half height" 3" FDD, i.e., 1.63 inches high. Today, the 1-inch high ("slimline" or "low-profile")
version of this form factor is the most popular form used in most desktops. The format was
standardized in terms of dimensions and positions of mounting holes as EIA/ECA-740, copublished as SFF-8301.[103]
2.5-inch
2.75 in 0.2750.75 in 3.945 in (69.85 mm 719 mm 100 mm) = 48.895132.715 cm3.
This smaller form factor was introduced by PrairieTek in 1988;[104] there is no corresponding
FDD. The 2.5-inch drive format is standardized in the EIA/ECA-720 co-published as SFF-8201;
when used with specific connectors, more detailed specifications are SFF-8212 for the 50-pin
(ATA laptop) connector, SFF-8223 with the SATA, or SAS connector and SFF-8222 with the
SCA-2 connector.[105]
It came to be widely used for HDDs in mobile devices (laptops, music players, etc.) and for
solid-state drives (SSDs), by 2008 replacing some 3.5 inch enterprise-class drives.[106] It is also
used in the PlayStation 3[107] and Xbox 360[citation needed] video game consoles.
Drives 9.5 mm high became an unofficial standard for all except the largest-capacity laptop
drives (usually having two platters inside); 12.5 mm-high drives, typically with three platters, are
used for maximum capacity, but will not fit most laptop computers. Enterprise-class drives can
have a height up to 15 mm.[108] Seagate released a 7 mm drive aimed at entry level laptops
and high end netbooks in December 2009.[109] Western Digital released on April 23, 2013 a
hard drive 5 mm in height specifically aimed at UltraBooks.[110]
open in browser PRO version
pdfcrowd.com
1.8-inch
54 mm 8 mm 78.5 mm[l] = 33.912 cm. This form factor, originally introduced by Integral
Peripherals in 1993, evolved into the ATA-7 LIF with dimensions as stated. For a time it was
increasingly used in digital audio players and subnotebooks, but its popularity decreased to the
point where this form factor is increasingly rare and only a small percentage of the overall
market.[111] There was an attempt to standardize this format as SFF-8123, but it was cancelled
in 2005.[112] SATA revision 2.6 standardized the internal Micro SATA connector and device
dimensions.
1-inch
42.8 mm 5 mm 36.4 mm. This form factor was introduced in 1999 as IBM's Microdrive to fit
inside a CF Type II slot. Samsung calls the same form factor "1.3 inch" drive in its product
literature.[113]
0.85-inch
24 mm 5 mm 32 mm. Toshiba announced this form factor in January 2004[114] for use in
mobile phones and similar applications, including SD/MMC slot compatible HDDs optimized for
video storage on 4G handsets. Toshiba manufactured a 4 GB (MK4001MTD) and an 8 GB
(MK8003MTD) version and holds the Guinness World Record for the smallest HDD.[115][116]
As of 2012, 2.5-inch and 3.5-inch hard disks were the most popular sizes.
By 2009 all manufacturers had discontinued the development of new products for the 1.3-inch, 1inch and 0.85-inch form factors due to falling prices of flash memory,[117][118] which has no moving
parts.
While these sizes are customarily described by an approximately correct figure in inches, actual
sizes have long been specified in millimeters.
pdfcrowd.com
Performance characteristics
[edit]
[edit]
The factors that limit the time to access the data on an HDD are mostly related to the mechanical
nature of the rotating disks and moving heads. Seek time is a measure of how long it takes the
head assembly to travel to the track of the disk that contains data. Rotational latency is incurred
because the desired disk sector may not be directly under the head when data transfer is
requested. These two delays are on the order of milliseconds each. The bit rate or data transfer
rate (once the head is in the right position) creates delay which is a function of the number of
blocks transferred; typically relatively small, but can be quite long with the transfer of large
contiguous files. Delay may also occur if the drive disks are stopped to save energy.
An HDD's Average Access Time is its average seek time which technically is the time to do all
possible seeks divided by the number of all possible seeks, but in practice is determined by
statistical methods or simply approximated as the time of a seek over one-third of the number of
tracks.[119]
Defragmentation is a procedure used to minimize delay in retrieving data by moving related items
to physically proximate areas on the disk.[120] Some computer operating systems perform
defragmentation automatically. Although automatic defragmentation is intended to reduce access
delays, performance will be temporarily reduced while the procedure is in progress.[121]
Time to access data can be improved by increasing rotational speed (thus reducing latency) or by
reducing the time spent seeking. Increasing areal density increases throughput by increasing data
rate and by increasing the amount of data under a set of heads, thereby potentially reducing seek
activity for a given amount of data. The time to access data has not kept up with throughput
open in browser PRO version
pdfcrowd.com
increases, which themselves have not kept up with growth in bit density and storage capacity.
Seek time
[edit]
Latency
[edit]
15,000
10,000
7,200
4.16
5,400
5.55
[ms]
pdfcrowd.com
5,400
5.55
rotational period.
4,800
6.25
[edit]
As of 2010, a typical 7,200-rpm desktop HDD has a sustained "disk-to-buffer" data transfer rate up
to 1,030 Mbits/sec.[125] This rate depends on the track location; the rate is higher for data on the
outer tracks (where there are more data sectors per rotation) and lower toward the inner tracks
(where there are fewer data sectors per rotation); and is generally somewhat higher for 10,000rpm drives. A current widely used standard for the "buffer-to-computer" interface is 3.0 Gbit/s
SATA, which can send about 300 megabyte/s (10-bit encoding) from the buffer to the computer,
and thus is still comfortably ahead of today's disk-to-buffer transfer rates. Data transfer rate
(read/write) can be measured by writing a large file to disk using special file generator tools, then
reading back the file. Transfer rate can be influenced by file system fragmentation and the layout
of the files.[120]
HDD data transfer rate depends upon the rotational speed of the platters and the data recording
density. Because heat and vibration limit rotational speed, advancing density becomes the main
method to improve sequential transfer rates. Higher speeds require a more powerful spindle motor,
which creates more heat. While areal density advances by increasing both the number of tracks
across the disk and the number of sectors per track, only the latter increases the data transfer
rate for a given rpm. Since data transfer rate performance only tracks one of the two components
of areal density, its performance improves at a lower rate.[citation needed]
Other considerations
[edit]
Other performance considerations include power consumption, audible noise, and shock
resistance.
open in browser PRO version
pdfcrowd.com
[edit]
2.5-inch SATA drive on top of a 3.5inch SATA drive, close-up of data and
power connectors
pdfcrowd.com
Small Computer System Interface (SCSI), originally named SASI for Shugart Associates System
Interface, was standard on servers, workstations, Commodore Amiga, Atari ST and Apple
Macintosh computers through the mid-1990s, by which time most models had been transitioned
to IDE (and later, SATA) family disks. The range limitations of the data cable allows for external
SCSI devices.
Integrated Drive Electronics (IDE), later standardized under the name AT Attachment (ATA,
with the alias P-ATA or PATA (Parallel ATA) retroactively added upon introduction of SATA)
moved the HDD controller from the interface card to the disk drive. This helped to standardize
the host/controller interface, reduce the programming complexity in the host device driver, and
reduced system cost and complexity. The 40-pin IDE/ATA connection transfers 16 bits of data
at a time on the data cable. The data cable was originally 40-conductor, but later higher speed
requirements for data transfer to and from the HDD led to an "ultra DMA" mode, known as
UDMA. Progressively swifter versions of this standard ultimately added the requirement for an
80-conductor variant of the same cable, where half of the conductors provides grounding
necessary for enhanced high-speed signal quality by reducing cross talk.
EIDE was an unofficial update (by Western Digital) to the original IDE standard, with the key
improvement being the use of direct memory access (DMA) to transfer data between the disk
and the computer without the involvement of the CPU, an improvement later adopted by the
official ATA standards. By directly transferring data between memory and disk, DMA eliminates
the need for the CPU to copy byte per byte, therefore allowing it to process other tasks while
the data transfer occurs.
Fibre Channel (FC) is a successor to parallel SCSI interface on enterprise market. It is a serial
protocol. In disk drives usually the Fibre Channel Arbitrated Loop (FC-AL) connection topology
is used. FC has much broader usage than mere disk interfaces, and it is the cornerstone of
storage area networks (SANs). Recently other protocols for this field, like iSCSI and ATA over
Ethernet have been developed as well. Confusingly, drives usually use copper twisted-pair
open in browser PRO version
pdfcrowd.com
cables for Fibre Channel, not fibre optics. The latter are traditionally reserved for larger
devices, such as servers or disk array controllers.
Serial Attached SCSI (SAS). The SAS is a new generation serial communication protocol for
devices designed to allow for much higher speed data transfers and is compatible with SATA.
SAS uses a mechanically identical data and power connector to standard 3.5-inch
SATA1/SATA2 HDDs, and many server-oriented SAS RAID controllers are also capable of
addressing SATA HDDs. SAS uses serial communication instead of the parallel method found
in traditional SCSI devices but still uses SCSI commands.
Serial ATA (SATA). The SATA data cable has one data pair for differential transmission of data
to the device, and one pair for differential receiving from the device, just like EIA-422. That
requires that data be transmitted serially. A similar differential signaling system is used in
RS485, LocalTalk, USB, FireWire, and differential SCSI.
[edit]
pdfcrowd.com
can be copied or cloned onto a new drive. In the event of disk-platter failures, disassembly and
imaging of the disk platters may be required.[129] For logical damage to file systems, a variety of
tools, including fsck on UNIX-like systems and CHKDSK on Windows, can be used for data
recovery. Recovery from logical damage can require file carving.
A common expectation is that hard disk drives designed and marketed for server use will fail less
frequently than consumer-grade drives usually used in desktop computers. However, two
independent studies by Carnegie Mellon University[130] and Google[131] found that the "grade" of a
drive does not relate to the drive's failure rate.
A 2011 summary of research into SSD and magnetic disk failure patterns by Tom's Hardware
summarized research findings as follows:[132]
MTBF does not indicate reliability; the annualized failure rate is higher and usually more
relevant.
Magnetic disks do not have a specific tendency to fail during early use, and temperature only
has a minor effect; instead, failure rates steadily increase with age.
S.M.A.R.T. warns of mechanical issues but not other issues affecting reliability, and is therefore
not a reliable indicator of condition.
Failure rates of drives sold as "enterprise" and "consumer" are "very much similar", although
customized for their different environments.
In drive arrays, one drive's failure significantly increases the short-term chance of a second
drive failing.
Market segments
[edit]
Desktop HDDs
They typically store between 60 GB and 4 TB and rotate at 5,400 to 10,000 rpm, and have a
open in browser PRO version
pdfcrowd.com
media transfer rate of 0.5 Gbit/s or higher (1 GB = 109 bytes; 1 Gbit/s = 109 bit/s). As of August
2014, the highest-capacity desktop HDDs store 8 TB.[87][133]
Mobile (laptop) HDDs
Smaller than their desktop and enterprise counterparts,
they tend to be slower and have lower capacity. Mobile
HDDs spin at 4,200 rpm, 5,200 rpm, 5,400 rpm, or
7,200 rpm, with 5,400 rpm being typical. 7,200 rpm
drives tend to be more expensive and have smaller
capacities, while 4,200 rpm models usually have very
high storage capacities. Because of smaller platter(s),
mobile HDDs generally have lower capacity than their
greater desktop counterparts.
There are also 2.5-inch drives spinning at 10,000 rpm,
which belong to the enterprise segment with no
pdfcrowd.com
running at 10,000 or 15,000 rpm use smaller platters to mitigate increased power requirements
(as they have less air drag) and therefore generally have lower capacity than the highest
capacity desktop drives. Enterprise HDDs are commonly connected through Serial Attached
SCSI (SAS) or Fibre Channel (FC). Some support multiple ports, so they can be connected to a
redundant host bus adapter.
Enterprise HDDs can have sector sizes larger than 512 bytes (often 520, 524, 528 or 536
bytes). The additional per-sector space can be used by hardware RAID controllers or
applications for storing Data Integrity Field (DIF) or Data Integrity Extensions (DIX) data,
resulting in higher reliability and prevention of silent data corruption.[136]
Consumer electronics HDDs
They include drives embedded into digital video recorders and automotive vehicles. The former
are configured to provide a guaranteed streaming capacity, even in the face of read and write
errors, while the latter are built to resist larger amounts of shock.
[edit]
pdfcrowd.com
[edit]
See also: USB mass storage / USB drive and Disk enclosure
External hard disk drives[n] typically connect via USB;
variants using USB 2.0 interface generally have
slower data transfer rates when compared to
internally mounted hard drives connected through
SATA. Plug and play drive functionality offers system
compatibility and features large storage options and
portable design. As of January 2015, available
capacities for external hard disk drives range from
500 GB to 6 TB.
External hard disk drives are usually available as pre-
pdfcrowd.com
Visual representation
[edit]
Hard disk drives are traditionally symbolized as a stylized stack of platters or as a cylinder, and are
as such found in various diagrams; sometimes, they are depicted with small lights to indicate data
access. In most modern graphical user environments (GUIs), hard disk drives are represented by
an illustration or photograph of the drive enclosure.
an array of disks
pdfcrowd.com
See also
[edit]
Electronics portal
Information Technology portal
Data erasure
Drive mapping
Error recovery control
Hybrid drive
Microdrive
RAID
S.M.A.R.T.
Solid-state drive
Write precompensation
Notes
[edit]
a. ^ This is the original filing date of the application which led to US Patent 3,503,060, generally
accepted as the definitive disk drive patent.[1]
b. ^ Further inequivalent terms used to describe various hard disk drives include disk drive, disk file,
direct access storage device (DASD), CKD disk, and Winchester disk drive (after the IBM 3340).
The term "DASD" includes other devices beside disks.
c. ^ Comparable in size to a large side-by-side refrigerator.
d. ^ Initially gamma iron oxide particles in an epoxy binder, the recording layer in a modern HDD
typically is domains of a granular Cobalt-Chrome-Platinum-based alloy physically isolated by an
oxide to enable perpendicular recording.[18]
open in browser PRO version
pdfcrowd.com
e. ^ Historically a variety of run-length limited codes have been used in magnetic recording including for
example, codes named FM, MFM and GCR which are no longer used in modern HDDs.
f. ^ However, some enterprise SAS drives have other block sizes such as 520, 524 and 528 bytes,
which can be changed in the field.
g. ^ a
h. ^ a
i. ^ The International System of Units (SI), formerly known as the "metric system", does not define
units for digital information but notes that the SI-defined prefixes (such as kilo, mega, etc.) may be
applied outside the contexts where SI-defined base units or derived units would be used.
j. ^ Five platters for a conventional hard disk drive, and seven platters for a hard disk drive filled with
Helium.
k. ^ Most common.
l. ^ a
This dimension includes a 0.5 mm protrusion of the Micro SATA connector from the device
body.
m. ^ The Quantum Bigfoot TS used a maximum of three platters, other earlier and lower capacity
product used up to four platters in a 5.25-inch HH form factor, e.g., Microscience HH1090 circa
1989.
n. ^ These differ from removable disk media, e.g., disk packs or data modules, in that they include, for
example, actuators, drive electronics, motors.
References
[edit]
1. ^ Kean, David W., "IBM San Jose, A quarter century of innovation", 1977.
2. ^ Arpaci-Dusseau, Remzi H.; Arpaci-Dusseau, Andrea C. (2014). "Operating Systems: Three Easy
Pieces [Chapter: Hard Disk Drives]"
3. ^ a
^a
open in browser PRO version
bc de f
. Retrieved 2012-10-19.
bc
pdfcrowd.com
4. ^ a
bc
IDC report: Worldwide Disk Storage Systems Quarterly Tracker (2014-06-19). "Any Future for
"Worldwide global disk storage systems revenue 2012 = $32,564 million; 2013 = $31,688 million"
5. ^ Fullerton, Eric (March 2014). "5th Non-Volatile Memories Workshop (NVMW 2014)"
(PDF) .
. Ars
. PC Magazine.
September 19, 2014. "IBM 350 disk drive held 3.75 MB"
10. ^ a
bc
11. ^ Ballistic Research Laboratories "A THIRD SURVEY OF DOMESTIC ELECTRONIC DIGITAL
COMPUTING SYSTEMS," March 1961, section on IBM 305 RAMAC
Company.
13. ^ "Magnetic head development"
2014.
15. ^ Microsoft Windows NT Workstation 4.0 Resource Guide 1995, Chapter 17 Disk and File System
Basics
16. ^ Computer Organization and Design, 2nd Ed., P. Pal Chaudhuri, 2006, p. 635
17. ^ "Farming hard drives: how Backblaze weathered the Thailand drive crisis"
. blaze.com. 2013.
Retrieved 2014-05-23.
open in browser PRO version
pdfcrowd.com
20. ^ "What is a "head-crash" & how can it result in permanent loss of my hard drive data?"
. data-
24. ^ Blount, Walker C. (November 2007). "Why 7,200 RPM Mobile Hard Disk Drives?"
Archived from the original
(PDF) .
2009.
30. ^ "Western Digital Scorpio 2" and Greenpower 3" HDDs per quarterly conference, July 2007"
, Hitachi
34. ^ MjM Data Recovery Ltd. "MJM Data Recovery Ltd: Hard Disk Bad Sector Mapping Techniques"
Datarecovery.mjm.co.uk. Archived from the original
35. ^ Charles M. Kozierok. "The PC Guide: Hard Disk: Sector Format and Structure"
36. ^ "Enterprise Performance 15K HDD: Data Sheet"
37. ^ "WD Xe: Datacenter hard drives"
open in browser PRO version
. 19972004.
pdfcrowd.com
original
40. ^ David S. H. Rosenthal (October 1, 2010). "Keeping Bits Safe: How Hard Can It Be?"
. ACM
. IBM DeveloperWorks.
. Scientific American.
. PC Magazine. March 25, 1997. Retrieved August 16, 2014. "Gordon Moore:
... the ability of the magnetic disk people to continue to increase the density is flabbergasting--that
has moved at least as fast as the semiconductor complexity."
44. ^ Coughlin, Tom (2014-12-22). "HDD Areal Density And $/TB Trends"
. Coughlin Associates
www.tomcoughlin.com (Atascadero, CA: Forbes). Retrieved 2014-12-23. "graph is 5%/yr for 2011
2014. Current HDD areal density growth trends are in the range of 10% annually."
45. ^ Mellor, Chris (2014-11-10). "Kryder's law craps out: Race to UBER-CHEAP STORAGE is
OVER"
. theregister.co.uk (UK: The Register). Retrieved 2014-11-12. "The 2011 Thai floods almost
doubled disk capacity cost/GB for a while. Rosenthal writes: "The technical difficulties of migrating
from PMR to HAMR, meant that already in 2010 the Kryder rate had slowed significantly and was
not expected to return to its trend in the near future. The floods reinforced this.""
46. ^ Rosenthal, David (2014-09-24). Moran, Nuala, ed. Economic Sustainability of Digital
Preservation . 3rd UPDATE Conference: Bringing data infrastructures to Horizon2020 .
Amsterdam, The Netherlands: EUDAT European Data Infrastructure. p. 10. "Disk cost per byte:
source Preeti Gupta, SSRC, UC Santa Cruz"
47. ^ Gupta, Preeti; Wildani. "An Economic Perspective of Disk vs. Flash Media in Archival Storage"
(PDF) . digitalpreservation.gov. Retrieved 2014-11-12. "disk cost per byte actual data points 1990
2013"
pdfcrowd.com
48. ^ Dubash, Manek (2005-04-13). "Moore's Law is dead, says Gordon Moore"
Archived
. techworld.com.
from the original on 2014-07-06. Retrieved 2014-08-17. "It can't continue forever. The
nature of exponentials is that you push them out and eventually disaster happens."
49. ^ a
bc d
(PDF) . Seagate.
Retrieved 2014-05-23. "PMR CAGR slowing from historical 40+% down to ~8-12%" and "HAMR
CAGR = 20-40% for 20152020"
50. ^ Plumer et. al, Martin L. (March 2011). "New Paradigms in Magnetic Recording"
(PDF) . Physics
"Shingled Magnetic Technology is the First Step to Reaching a 20 Terabyte Hard Drive by 2020"
52. ^ Jake Edge (2014-03-26). "Support for shingled magnetic recording devices"
. LWN.net. Retrieved
2015-01-07.
53. ^ Jonathan Corbet (2013-04-23). "LSFMM: A storage technology update"
. LWN.net. Retrieved
2015-01-07. "A 'shingled magnetic recording' (SMR) drive is a rotating drive that packs its tracks so
closely that one track cannot be overwritten without destroying the neighboring tracks as well. The
result is that overwriting data requires rewriting the entire set of closely-spaced tracks; that is an
expensive tradeoff, but the benefitmuch higher storage densityis deemed to be worth the cost in
some situations."
54. ^ "Xyratex no-go for bit-patterned media"
56. ^ Mallary et. al, Mike (July 2014). "Head and Media Challenges for 3 Tb/in2 Microwave-Assisted
Magnetic Recording". IEEE TransMag (IEEE) 50 (7): 3001008.
57. ^ Wood, Roger (2010-10-19). "Shingled Magnetic Recording and Two-Dimensional Magnetic
Recording"
. PC Magazine. 19 August
pdfcrowd.com
59. ^ Coughlin, Thomas; Grochowski, Edward (19 June 2012). "Years of Destiny: HDD Capital Spending
and Technology Developments from 20122016"
62. ^ Raymond, Robert M. (2013-09-09). "Current and Emerging Storage Technologies iCAS2013"
(PDF) . In Mahoney III, William P. Storage Technologies Areal Density Trends. International
Computing for the Atmospheric Sciences Symposium (iCAS2013) . Annecy, France: ORACLE
Corp. at National Center for Atmospheric Research under sponsorship from the U.S. National
Science Foundation. "page 11: Areal Density (Gbits/in^2) HDD Products 20102022 10-20%/year?"
63. ^ "HDD Areal Density Doubling in Five Years"
storagenewsletter.com. 2012-05-24. Retrieved 2014-05-31. "from 2011 to 2016, the five-year CAGR
for HDD areal densities will be equivalent to 19%"
64. ^ Fontana, R.; Decad, G.; Hetzler, S. (2012-09-20). "Technology Roadmap Comparisons for TAPE,
HDD, and NAND Flash: Implications for Data Storage Applications"
(PDF) . digitalpreservation.gov
(Washington D.C.: The Library of Congress). p. 18. Retrieved 2014-07-05. "Annual Areal Density
Growth Rate Scenarios: HDD 20%/yr 20122017"
65. ^ Kaur, Simran (2014-09-15). "Seagate treads safely in uncertain demand environment; narrow moat
has negative trend."
slowed around 2010 and will advance areal density 25% annually till 2020."
66. ^ a
Information technology Serial Attached SCSI 2 (SAS-2), INCITS 457 Draft 2, 8 May 2009,
chapter 4.1 Direct-access block device type model overview, "The LBAs on a logical unit shall begin
with zero and shall be contiguous up to the last logical block on the logical unit."
67. ^ a
ISO/IEC 791D:1994, AT Attachment Interface for Disk Drives (ATA-1), section 7.1.2
pdfcrowd.com
. Anandtech.com.
72. ^ a
(PDF)
74. ^ "Drive displays a smaller capacity than the indicated size on the drive label"
76. ^ "Samsung"
77. ^ "Toshiba"
80. ^ Mulvany, R.B., "Engineering Design of a Disk Storage Facility with Data Modules". IBM JRD,
November 1974
81. ^ Introduction to IBM Direct Access Storage Devices, M. Bohl, IBM publication SR20-4738. 1981.
82. ^ CDC Product Line Card
83. ^ a
, October 1974
. Apple, Inc.
84. ^ "Western Digital Settles Hard-Drive Capacity Lawsuit, Associated Press 28 June 2006 retrieved 25
November 2010"
85. ^ Published on 26 October 2007 by Phil Cogar (26 October 2007). "Seagate lawsuit concludes,
settlement announced"
. Xtremesystems.org. Retrieved
26 April 2012.
87. ^ a
bc
pdfcrowd.com
88. ^ "Ultrastar He6: 6TB 3.5-inch Helium Platform Enterprise Hard Drive"
2013-12-06.
89. ^ "Western Digital builds 5mm-thick hybrid hard drive, Ultrabook makers sign on early"
. Engadget.
Retrieved 2013-01-07.
90. ^ "Quantum Go*Drive specifications"
(PDF) .
94. ^ Seagate Elite 47, shipped 12/97 per 1998 Disk/Trend Report Rigid Disk Drives
95. ^ Quantum Bigfoot TS, shipped 10/98 per 1999 Disk/Trend Report Rigid Disk Drives
96. ^ "SDK Starts Shipments of 1.3-Inch PMR-Technology-Based HD Media"
2008. Archived from the original
. Sdk.co.jp. 10 January
97. ^ "Proving that 8 GB, 0.85 inch hard disk drive exists"
pdfcrowd.com
108. ^ Schmid, Patrick and Achim Roos (22 May 2010). "9.5 Versus 12.5 mm: Which Notebook HDD Is
Right For You?"
109. ^ "Seagate Unveils World's Thinnest 2.5-Inch Hard Drive For Slim Laptop Computers"
. PCWorld.
(PDF) . SFF
, Samsung, 2008
114. ^ Toshiba's 0.85-inch HDD is set to bring multi-gigabyte capacities to small, powerful digital
products
116. ^ Toshiba enters Guinness World Records Book with the world's smallest hard disk drive , Toshiba
press release, 16 March 2004
117. ^ Flash price fall shakes HDD market
118. ^ In 2008 Samsung
introduced the 1.3-inch SpinPoint A1 HDD but by March 2009 the family was
2012.
120. ^ a
. ITWorld.
pdfcrowd.com
121. ^ Broida, Rick (10 April 2009). "Turning Off Disk Defragmenter May Solve a Sluggish PC"
PCWorld.
122. ^ Anand Lal Shimpi (2010-04-06). "Western Digital's New VelociRaptor VR200M: 10K RPM at
450GB and 600GB"
15 January 2011.
124. ^ "IBM Archives: IBM 3350 direct access storage"
125. ^ " "Speed Considerations" "
on 2011-02-10. Retrieved
22 January 2011.
126. ^ " "Reed Solomon Codes Introduction" "
on 8 July 2011.
127. ^ "Micro House PC Hardware Library Volume I: Hard Drives, Scott Mueler, Macmillan Computer
Publishing"
(PDF) .
2010-08-24.
131. ^ Eduardo Pinheiro, Wolf-Dietrich Weber and Luiz Andr Barroso (February 2007). "Failure Trends in
a Large Disk Drive Population"
pdfcrowd.com
(PDF) on 2015-01-09. Retrieved 2015-01-23. "Most disk drives use 512-byte sectors.
[...] Enterprise drives (Parallel SCSI/SAS/FC) support 520/528 byte 'fat' sectors."
137. ^ "Back Up Your Important Data to External Hard disk drive | Biometric Safe | Info and Products
Reviews about Biometric Security Device "
Archived from the original
assembled external hard disk drive without its enclosure that cannot be used internally on a laptop or
desktop due to the embedded interface on its printed circuit board"
139. ^ Sebean Hsiung (2010-05-05). "How to bypass USB controller and use as a SATA drive"
Further reading
[edit]
Mueller, Scott (2011). Upgrading and Repairing PCs (20th ed.). Que. ISBN 0-7897-4710-3.
Messmer, Hans-Peter (2001). The Indispensable PC Hardware Book (4th ed.). AddisonWesley. ISBN 0-201-59616-4.
External links
[edit]
pdfcrowd.com
be?
Hard disk hacking
PowerChoice Technology for Hard Disk Drive Power Savings and Flexibility
, Seagate
V T E
[show]
V T E
[show]
V T E
[show]
V T E
[show]
Computer peripherals
Non-volatile memory
pdfcrowd.com
Privacy policy
Mobile view
pdfcrowd.com