Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ESDEP WG 10
COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Definition
A composite slab consists of a cold-formed profiled steel sheet
covered with a concrete slab containing reinforcement (Figure 1).
Such slabs are generally used in frame structures, with steel floor
beams, as discussed previously in Lecture 10.1. They can also be
used in combination with other materials.
There are many types of profiled sheet used for the construction of
composite slabs (Figure 2). These types vary in form, rib depth, rib
spacing, sheet size, style of lateral over-lapping; in the methods of
stiffening the flat elements of the profile; and in the methods of
mechanical connection which ensure bond between the steel sheet
and concrete slab.
The thickness of the sheets can vary from 0,75 mm to 1,5 mm but
in normal practice it lies between 0,75 and 1,0 mm.
The height of the profiled sheets can vary from 38 mm to 80 mm.
Whatever the particular requirements for a steel framed building, it
is probable that they can be met by using a profiled sheet from this
range, as the typical criteria for sound insulation, fire protection,
maximum span and maximum load can easily be met.
The bond between the concrete slab and the profiled sheet must be
capable of transmitting longitudinal shear at the steel-concrete
interface.
This connection can be made in one or more of the following ways,
as shown in Figure 3 (which has been taken from Fig. 7.1 of
Eurocode 4 [1]):
2. DESIGN PRINCIPLES
2.1 Design Situations
When designing composite slabs two distinct structural states must
be checked: firstly, the temporary state of execution, when only the
sheeting resists the applied loads; secondly, the permanent state,
after the concrete is bonded to the steel giving composite action.
Relevant limit states and load cases are considered for both design
situations.
a) Profiled sheeting as shuttering
Verifications at the ultimate limit state and the serviceability limit
state are required, with respect to the safety and serviceability of
the profiled sheeting acting as formwork for the wet concrete. The
effects of any temporary props used during execution, must be
taken into account in this design situation.
b) Composite slabs
Verifications at the ultimate limit state and the serviceability limit
state are required, with respect to the safety and the serviceability
of the composite slab after composite behaviour has commenced
and any props have been removed.
2.2 Actions
The loads and other actions to be considered, for the ultimate and
serviceability limit state, are given in the relevant Eurocodes.
For the situation where the profiled sheeting acts as formwork, the
following loads should be considered in the calculations, taking into
account any propping effects:
For the serviceability limit state, long duration values of the loads
are required for the calculation of deformations taking into account
creep and shrinkage of the concrete.
Mode 1
The characteristic of this mode is an initial linear curve, as in Figure
5, which corresponds to the behaviour of a homogeneous material
held together by surface effects (chemical bond and friction) and
mechanical effects (embossments and anchorages). No significant
relative slip between the steel and the concrete takes place; as the
load increases, the rigidity decreases because of the cracks which
form in the concrete in tension. Shear stresses between the steel
and concrete increase in the zone between the concentrated load
and the support. At a certain point the relative slip is such that the
bond is broken and the load suddenly decreases. All the shear force
must therefore be taken up by friction and by any embossments;
the amount of load decrease is therefore dependent on the quality
of the mechanical bond. With further deformation of the slab the
load increases again slightly without ever reaching the level of the
initial phase. This means that the mechanical bond is incapable of
Mode 2
This mode is characterised by an initial phase similar to that of
mode 1. However, the second phase is different: after a decrease in
load, corresponding to failure of the steel-concrete bond in the
sheared zone, the load increases again up to a higher level. This
increase shows that the mechanical connection is capable of
transferring the shear force until failure occurs by bending,
corresponding to full shear connection, or by longitudinal shear,
corresponding to partial shear connection.
The two modes described above represent brittle (or non-ductile)
behaviour (mode1), and ductile behaviour (mode 2), see Figure 5.
linear elastic.
linear elastic with moment redistribution.
The analysis will use one of the above statical models in conjunction
with the design loads determined, as discussed earlier in Section
2.2.
Worked Example 10.4 illustrates how the actual stresses and strains
are determined and how the internal forces and moments (M, N, V)
are calculated for the structural system chosen.
b) Analysis for the serviceability limit states
An analysis of the composite slab, for calculating deflection, may be
made with the following assumptions:
Possible slip between the profiled sheeting and concrete slab must
be taken into account at the serviceability limit states. Slip may
occur in the span and greatly influence deflection. It is necessary,
therefore, to fully understand the behaviour of composite slabs
through approved testing.
To eliminate excessive slip it is possible to place anchorages, for
example welded studs or shot-fired connectors, at the ends of the
spans (see Figure 3d and e).
4. RESISTANCES OF SECTIONS
According to Section 3, the critical sections which should be verified,
are as follows (Figure 7):
(1)
where:
Aap is the area of the profiled sheet section.
fyap is the characteristic yield strength of the sheet steel.
ap is the partial safety factor for steel sheeting.
b is the width of the slab (b = 1000 mm).
fck is the characteristic compressive strength of the concrete.
c is the partial safety factor for concrete.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
where
e is the distance from the centroid of the effective area of the
sheeting to its underside.
ep is the distance from the plastic neutral axis of the effective area
of sheeting to its underside.
Mpa is the plastic moment resistance of the effective cross-section of
the sheeting.
M+p,Rd = As.fysz-/s
(7)
where
As is the area of reinforcement
fys is the yield strength of the reinforcement
s is the partial safety factor for the reinforcement
z- is the lever-arm of the internal forces Nc and Nt.
The condition of equilibrium between these forces allows the
determination of z-:
Nc- = bcx0,85fck/c= As.fys/s= Ntx = [As.fys/s][bc0,85fck/c]
(8)
(9)
= ds - x/2 (10)
where
bc is the width of the concrete in compression, taken as the width of
the troughs over 1m for simplicity (bc = bo).
ds is the effective depth
(13)
a is the distance between the axis of the stud and the extremity of
the profiled sheet (a 2dw).
b) Partial shear connection method
The fact that composite slabs fail by longitudinal shear in most
cases, allows this structural system to be compared to a composite
steel beam and concrete slab with partial shear connection. It is
also possible to represent the resistance of such slabs by a diagram
giving MSd/MRd as a function of Nc/Ncf. This diagram is different to
that given for composite beams due to the fact that the degree of
partial shear connection Nc/Ncf is not a function of the number of
connectors, but of the shear length ls and of the distribution of
longitudinal shear stresses over this length. The relative slip s
between the profiled sheeting and the concrete also plays a more
important role.
The determination of such diagrams for design is therefore
complicated since one of the following is necessary:
a) non-linear analysis of the resistance and behaviour of slabs
combined with shear tests on specimens representative of the
connection.
b) many tests of composite slabs, with measurements taken of the
normal force Nc, transferred over the shear length.
Studies are being undertaken at present to try to establish a
simplified method based on scientific research. Eurocode 4 [1] gives
such an alternative method in Appendix E, based on research
conducted recently in Germany. This alternative method will not be
described further in this lecture.
(20)
where
Iap is the unreduced second moment of area of the sheet based
upon the net sheet thickness
b) Uncracked section
The second moment of area Ibu of the uncracked section can be
obtained from:
Ibu =
(22)
where
bc is the total average rib width over a slab width of 1 m.
xu is the position of the elastic neutral axis:
xu =
(23)
5. VERIFICATIONS
This lecture has given a brief introduction to composite slabs
constructed with profiled steel sheeting. The basic design principles
have been given, which allow a schematic structural arrangement
and statical system to be determined. The procedure for analysing
the slab under the external loads to find the internal stresses and
strains has then been considered. Now, various verifications are
necessary to show that structural safety (resistance, stability) and
serviceability (deflection, vibration) requirements are met.
the slab occurs by failure of the shear bond. The bending resistance
at section I cannot then be attained.
If the empirical "m-k" method is used, the condition can be
expressed as:
VSd Vl,Rd (27)
where
VSd is the design value of the vertical shear (equivalent span, see
Figure 13).
VlRd Is the design value of the shear resistance.
(28)
b) Crack width
Given that there is a profiled sheet on the lower surface of the
concrete slab, only concrete cracking at the supports must be
verified. Such verifications should be made according to the
established rules for reinforced concrete, given in Eurocode 2 [4].
In normal circumstances when, for example, the slab is designed as
a series of simply supported beams, minimum reinforcement placed
at the supports is sufficient. Normal circumstances are: no exposure
to aggressive physical or chemical environments; no damage other
than cracking; no requirements regarding water proofing of the
slab; and no special requirements regarding appearance.
min =
(29)
for slabs unpropped at the time of concreting:
6. CONCLUDING SUMMARY
7. REFERENCES
[1] Eurocode 4: "Design of Composite Steel and Concrete
Structures": ENV 1994-1-1: Part 1.1: General rules and rules form
buildings, CEN (in press).
[2] Eurocode 1: "Basis of Design and Actions on Structures", CEN
(in preparation).
[3] prEN 10147, "Continuous Hot Dip Zinc Coated Carbon Steel
Sheet of Structural Quality", European Standard, 1979.
[4] Eurocode 2: "Design of Concrete Structures": ENV 1992-1-1:
Part 1.1: General rules and rules form buildings, CEN, 1992.
[5] Eurocode 3: "Design of Steel Structures": ENV 1993-1-1: Part
1.1: General rules and rules form buildings, CEN, 1992.
8. ADDITIONAL READING
1. Patrick, M, "A New Partial Shear Connection Strength Model
for Composite Slabs", The Broken Hill Proprietary Company
Limited, Melbourne Research Laboratories, Report
MRL/PS64/90/016, Mulgrave, Victoria, Australia, March 1990.
2. Daniels, B, "Behaviour and Load Carrying Capacity of
Composite Slabs: Mathematical Modelling and Experimental
Studies", Doctoral thesis No 895, Ecole polytechnique fdrale
de Lausanne, ICOM-Construction mtallique, Lausanne, 1990.
Concrete grade
C20/25
C25/30
C30/37
C35/45
fck [N/mm2]
20
25
30
35
fctm [N/mm2]
2,2
2,6
2,9
3,2
Rd [N/mm2]
0,26
0,30
0,34
0,37
Ecm [kN/mm2]
29
30,5
32
33,5
S 500
S 550
(ribbed bars)
(welded mesh)
fsk [N/mm2]
500
550
ftk [N/mm2]
550-600
580
1,1
1,05
Es [kN/mm2]
210
210