0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
375 Ansichten2 Seiten
Margaret Defensor worked as a Group Publisher for Mega Magazine Publications and proposed a year-end commission and special incentive plan for sales employees. The company's Executive VP Sarita Yap made counterproposals and asked Margaret to draft an agreement. Margaret submitted another proposal that Yap did not immediately comment on. However, Yap later formalized her own revised incentive scheme. After leaving the company, Margaret filed a complaint demanding payment based on her last proposal. Yap claimed sales did not meet quotas for the bonuses.
The Labor Arbiter and NLRC dismissed the complaint. However, the CA remanded to allow additional evidence from a witness corroborating that sales met quotas. The Supreme Court ruled in Margaret's favor,
Margaret Defensor worked as a Group Publisher for Mega Magazine Publications and proposed a year-end commission and special incentive plan for sales employees. The company's Executive VP Sar…