APPENDIX B

Statistical Tables

433
Table B-1 Normal Curve Areas

Source: Abridged from Table 1 of Statistical Tables and Formulas, by A. Hald, John Wiley & Sons,
1952. Reproduced by permission of John Wiley & Sons.

434
Table B-2 Percentage Points of the
2-Distribution

Source: ‘‘Tables of the Percentage Points of the
-Distribution,’’ by Catherine M. Thompson,

Biometrika, Vol. 32, pp. 188—189 (1941). Reproduced by permission of the editor of Biometrika.

435
 Table B-3 5% Points of the F-Distribution

436
437
 Table B-3 2.5% Points of the F-Distribution

438
439
 Table B-3 1% Points of the F-Distribution

440
441
 Table B-3 0.5% Points of the F-Distribution

442
 Source: ‘‘Tables of Percentage Points of the Inverted Beta (F) Distribution,’’ by Maxine Merrington and Catherine M. Thompson,

443
Biometrika, Vol. 33, pp. 73—88 (1943). Reproduced by permission of the editor of Biometrika.
Table B-4 Upper Tail Probabilities for the Null Distribution of the Kruskal--Wallis H
Statistic: k : 3, n1 : 1(1)5, n2 : n1(1)5, 2  n3 : n2(1)5

444
Table B-4 (continued)

445
Table B-4 (continued)

446
Table B-4 (continued)

447
Table B-4 (continued)

448
Table B-4 (continued)

449
Table B-4 (continued)

450
Table B-4 (continued)

451
Table B-4 (continued)

452
Table B-4 (continued)

453
Table B-4 (continued)

454
Table B-4 (continued)

455
Table B-4 (continued)

456
Table B-4 (continued)

457
Table B-4 (continued)

Source: Table F of A Nonparametric Introduction to Statistics, by C. H. Kraft and C van Eedan,

Macmillan, New York, 1968. Reproduced by permission of the Macmillan Publishing Company.

458
Table B-5 Selected Critical Values for All Treatments: Multiple Comparisons Based on
Kruskal--Wallis Rank Sums

Source: ‘‘Rank Sum Multiple Comparisons in One- and Two-Way Classification,’’ by B. J.

McDonald and W. A. Thompson, Biometrika, Vol. 54, pp. 487—497 (1967). Reproduced by
permission of the editor of Biometrika. The starred values are from ‘‘Distribution-Free Multiple
Comparisons,’’ Ph.D. thesis (1963), P. Nemenyi, Princeton University, with permission of the
author. 459
Table B-6 Selected Critical Values for the Range of k Independent N(0, 1) Variables:
k : 2(1)20(2)40(10)100

For a given k and , the tabled entry is q(, k, -).

Source: ‘‘Table of Range and Studentized Range,’’ by H. L. Harter, Ann. Math. Statist., Vol. 31, pp.
1122—1147 (1960). Reproduced by permission of the editor of the Annals of Mathematical
Statistics.

460
Table B-7 Percentage Points of the t-Distribution

Source: ‘‘Table of Percentage Points of the t-Distribution,’’ by Maxine Merrington, Biometrika,

Vol. 32, p. 300 (1941). Reproduced by permission of the editor of Biometrika.

461
Table B-8 Coefficients (ai and bi) of the Best Estimates of the Mean (
) and Standard
Deviation () in Censored Samples Up to n : 20 from A Normal Population

462
Table B-8 (continued)

463
Table B-8 (continued)

464
 Table B-8 (continued )

465
466
Table B-8 (continued )
467
 Table B-8 (continued )

468
469
470
Table B-8 (continued )
471
 Table B-8 (continued )

472
Source: ‘‘Estimation of Location and Scale Parameters by Order Statistics from Singly and Doubly Censored Samples, Parts I and II,’’ by A. E.
Sarhan and B. G. Greenberg, Ann. Math. Statist., Vol. 27, pp. 427—451 (1956). Reproduced by permission of the editor of the Annals of
Mathematical Statistics.
 Table B-9 Variances and Covariances of the Best Linear Estimates of the Mean (
 ) and Standard Deviation ( ) for
Censored Samples Up to Size 20 from a Normal Population

473
 Table B-9 (continued )

474
Source: Up to n : 15 of this table is reproduced from A. E. Sarhan and B. G. Greenberg, ‘‘Estimation of Location and Scale Parameters by Order Statistics
from Singly and Censored Samples, Parts I and II,’’ Ann. Math. Statist., Vol. 27, pp. 427—451 (1956), and Vol. 29, pp. 79—105 (1958), with permission of the
editor of the Annals of Mathematical Statistics. The rest of the table is produced from A. E. Sarhan and B. G. Greenberg, ‘‘Estimation of Location and Scale
Parameters by Order Statistics from Singly and Doubly Censored Samples, Part III,’’ Tech. Rep. 4-OOR, Project 1597, U.S. Army Research Office.
Table B-10 1/(1 9 R) and  for the Estimation of the Parameters of the Gamma
Distribution When There Are No Censored Observations

Source: ‘‘Estimation of Parameters of the Gamma Distribution Using Order Statistics,’’ by M. B.

Wilk, R. Gnanadesikan, and Marilyn J. Huyett, Biometrika, Vol. 49, pp. 525—545 (1962).
Reproduced by permission of the editor of Biometrika.

475
Table B-11  (P, S) and
 (P, S) for Various Values of n/r: n/r : 1.0

For P  0.52 read S from the left-hand margin, and for P  0.56 read S from the right-hand
margin. Note that the figures in region 2 are printed in bold roman type and those in region 3 in
bold italic type; the remainder of the table (outside of regions 2 and 3) is region 1.

476
Table B-11 (continued)

477
Table B-11 (continued)

478
Table B-11 (continued)

479
Table B-11 (continued)

480
Table B-11 (continued)

481
Table B-11 (continued)

482
Table B-11 (continued)

483
Table B-11 (continued)

484
Table B-11 (continued)

Source: ‘‘Estimation of Parameters of the Gamma Distribution Using Order Statistics,’’ by M. B.

Wilk, R. Gnanadesikan, and Marilyn J. Huyett, Biometrika, Vol. 49, pp. 525—545 (1962).
Reproduced by permission of the editor of Biometrika.

485
Table B-12 Percentage Points l Such That P( 1/ 2  l) : 1 9 

Source: ‘‘Two Sample Test in the Weibull Distribution,’’ by D. R. Thoman and L. J. Bain,
Technometrics, Vol. 11, pp. 805—815 (1969). Reproduced by permission of the editor of Techno-
metrics.

486
Table B-13 Percentage Points z Such That P(G  z) : 1 9 

Source: ‘‘Two Sample Test in the Weibull Distribution,’’ by D. R. Thoman and L. J. Bain,
Technometrics, Vol. 11, pp. 805—815 (1969). Reproduced by permission of the editor of Techno-
metrics.

487
 References

Aaronson, K. D., Schwartz, J. S., Chen, T. M., Wong, K. L., Goin, J. E, and Mancini,D.
M. (1997). Development and Prospective Validation of a Clinical Index to Predict
Survival in Ambulatory Patients Referred for Cardiac Transplant Evaluation.
Circulation, 95, 2660—2667.
Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I. A. (1964). Handbook of Mathematical Functions with
Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. Applied Mathematics Series 55.
National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC.
Afifi, A. A., and Clark, V. (1990). Computer-Aided Multivariate Analysis, 2nd ed.
Lifetime Learning Publications, Belmont, CA.
Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley, New York.
Aitchison, J. (1970). Statistical Problems of Treatment Allocation. Journal of the Royal
Statistical Society, Series A, 133, 206—238
Aitchison, J., and Brown, J. A. C. (1957). The Lognormal Distribution. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.
Aitchison, J., and Silvey, S. D. (1957). The Generalization of Probit Analysis to the Case
of Multiple Responses. Biometrika, 44, 131—140.
Aitkin, M., Laird, N., and Francis, B. (1983). A Reanalysis of the Stanford Heart
Transplant Data (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association,
78, 264—292.
Akaike, H. (1969). Fitting Autoregressive Models for Prediction. Annals of the Institute
of Statistical Mathematics, 21, 243—247.
Akaike, H. (1974). A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification. IEEE Transac-
tions on Automatic Control, AC-19, 716—723.
Albert, I. J. (2000). The Use of Frailty Models in Genetic Studies: Application to the
Relationship between End-Stage Renal Failure and Mutation Type in Alport
Syndrome. European Community Alport Syndrome Concerted Action Group
(ECASCA). Journal of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 5(3), 169—175.
Albertson, P. C., Hanley, J. A., Gleason, D. F., and Barry, M. J. (1998). Competing Risk
Analysis of Men Aged 55 to 74 Years at Diagnosis Managed Conservatively for
Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association,
280(11), 975—980.
488