33 Energy Audit Report On Tubewells and Sewage Pumping Stations in Sialkot

TA 7321 PAK
Punjab Cities Improvement

Investment Program
Government of Punjab
Urban Unit
ENERGY AUDIT REPORT

ON
TUBEWELLS AND SEWAGE PUMPING
STATIONS IN SIALKOT
Draft Final
December 2010
J40252334
GHK Consulting Ltd
Electricity has a direct relation with the cost of accessing water and is therefore our starting
point for making suggestion for optimization of this resource.
With rising energy cost, public sector is also increasing its focus on the amount of energy
expended by rotating equipment accounts for 20% of world electrical demand; energy cost is
the largest element in owning a pump. Improperly sized or poorly performing pumps are
costing municipalities millions of unnecessary rupees. Unscheduled repair and poor
reliability are causing them serious hindrances in the continuation of the pumps operation.
So our motto is, lets not waste even a single watt of energy without benefiting a man.
It is the time of understanding the need of conserving precious resources (both water and
electricity) which are limited and apprehended to be diminished.
Access to safe, affordable and convenient water drastically reduces diseases, improves the
quality of life and strengthens the economy.
In this context the energy audit is being carried out and realization of the recommendations
is expected to turn out in annual savings of energy as well as ensure the availability of clean
water in the smooth way too.
Energy Audit Report of Tubewells,

Sewage Pumping Stations
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATION ........................................................................................................... ii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 1
1.0
INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 4
2.0
LOCATION .................................................................................................................................. 5
3.0
TERMS OF REFERENCE .......................................................................................................... 7
4.0
METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................ 8
5.0
REFERENCE OF ANNEXURE ................................................................................................... 9
6.0
UTILITIES ANALYSIS .............................................................................................................. 10
7.0
NON OPERATIONAL TUBEWELLS........................................................................................ 11
8.0
OPERATIONAL TUBEWELLS AND THEIR CAPACITY ........................................................ 12
9.0
RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DEPLETING WATER LEVEL ....................................... 13
10.0 NON CONTRIBUTING TUBEWELLS ...................................................................................... 14
11.0 PUMPS FOR REHABILITATION ............................................................................................. 15
12.0 ELECTRICITY ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................... 18
12.1 Energy Trend with Depleting Water Level ................................................................................ 18
12.2 Energy Consumption Analysis .................................................................................................. 20
12.3 Power Factor on Site ................................................................................................................ 22
12.4 Important to understand Energy Cost ....................................................................................... 24
13.0 ENERGY MANAGEMENT PLAN ............................................................................................. 26
13.1 ECO 1: Improved Motor Control Panels ................................................................................... 26
13.2 ECO 2: Awareness Raising And Education .............................................................................. 26
13.3 ECO3: Minimizing Voltage Unbalances .................................................................................... 27
13.4 ECO 4: Adequate Maintenance ................................................................................................ 28
13.5 ECO 5: Monitoring .................................................................................................................... 28
13.6 ECO 6: Adequate Design Parameters...................................................................................... 29
13.7 ECO 7: Preventing Throttling Of Pumps ................................................................................... 30
13.8 ECO 8: Procurement of Right Pumps ....................................................................................... 30
13.9 ECO 09: Proper Distribution System ........................................................................................ 31
13.10 ECO 10: Energy Savings in Electric Motors ............................................................................. 32
14.0 CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................................... 33
TABLES
Table 6-1:
Table 6-2:
Table 7-1:
Table 8-1:
Table 10-1:
Table 11-1:
Table 12-1:
Table 12-2:
Table 12-3:
Table 12-4:
Table 12-5:
Table 12-6;
Table 12-7:
Table 12-8:
Table 12-9:
Table 12-10:
Table 12-11:
FIGURES
Figure 2-1:
Figure 7-1:
Figure 8-1:
Figure 11-1:
Figure 11-2:
Figure 11-3:
Figure 11-4:
Figure 12-1:
Figure 12-2:
Figure 12-3:
Number of Pumps Operated by Cantt and TMA ............................................................ 10

Tube wells Operating Schedule ..................................................................................... 10
Reason of Non Operational Tube wells ......................................................................... 11
Design Capacity of Installed Pumps Vs Operational Capacity of Pumps ...................... 12
TMA Pumps Not Adding in the System .......................................................................... 14
Pumps Required to be Upgraded/ Refurbished ............................................................. 15
Present consumption of Electricity ................................................................................. 18
Position of total Discharge per kW consumed ............................................................... 18
Next Year Position after 80-90 Ft Water Level............................................................... 19
Next Year Position of Discharge per kW consumed ...................................................... 19
Expected performance of the pumps after Implementation of Recommendations. ....... 19
Position of Discharge per kW consumed after Implementation of Recommendations .. 19
Extraordinary Energy Consumption ............................................................................... 20
Power Factor of TMA Pumps ......................................................................................... 22
Power Factor of PHED Pumps ....................................................................................... 23
Power Factor of Cantt Pumps ........................................................................................ 24
Power Factor of Disposal Pumps ................................................................................... 24
Map of Sialkot Showing Location of Tubewells ................................................................ 6
Non Operational Pumps (Graphical Form)..................................................................... 11
Installed Capacity Vs Operational Capacity (Graphical form) ........................................ 12
TMA Tube wells Present and Next Year Discharge ....................................................... 16
Remaining TMA Tubewells Present and Next Year Discharge ..................................... 16
PHED Tube wells Present and Next Year Discharge .................................................... 17
Cantt Board Tube wells Present and Next Year Discharge ........................................... 17
Future Discharge Trend in Graphical Form .................................................................... 20
Energy Saving Potential: ................................................................................................ 21
Detail of Power Factor and Expected Annual Penalty ................................................... 24
GHK Consulting Limited

J40252334
Page i

Acronyms & Abbreviations
ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATION

ADB
Asian Development Bank
GHK
GHK Consulting Ltd.
TMA
Tehsil Municipal Administration
PHED
Public Health Engineering Department
Cantt
Cantonment Board Sialkot Best
BEP
Best Efficiency Point
DOH
Daily Operating Hours
TOR
Terms of Reference
PF
Power Factor
ECO
Energy Conservation Opportunities
KW
Kilo Watt
Voltage
Cubic Meter
Ft
Feet
Cusec
Cubic Feet Per Second
Head of Pump
Capacity of Pump
Vs
Verses
Nr.
Number
No.
Number
Note:

J40252334
For the calculation of energy cost a flat rate of Rs. 14/kwh is used.
Page ii

Executive Summary
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Energy Audit is a systematic study or survey on the current usage of energy and
identifies energy conservation opportunities with the help of proper audit methods and
equipments. It provides feasibility or technical solution options for the authorities to
decide project implementation.
Energy audit conducted in Sialkot is basically on the Tube wells, so during survey our
main focus on the rotating equipment which were pumps.
Pumps are designed for a specific flow and pressure and attain its maximum efficiency at
a specific point i.e. Best Efficiency Point (BEP). If the design point is within the limit of
BEP, it gives required output with minimum required energy. On the contrary if pump is
operated away from its BEP it will be increasingly inefficient and not only consuming
more energy but also suffer mechanical damage or reduced operating life. It is important
to select a pump to be operated close to its BEP
Figure E.1 shows the selection of the pump to be made in such a way that it should
work around best efficiency point, departing from BEP incur high energy consumption
and may take pump operation into uncertain condition.
During energy audit pumps
behavior was studied very
precisely to draw some analysis.
Main focus was remained on the
study of the site loads and
matching it with the installed
Pumps, measurement of actual
energy consumed by each pump
at site and the power factor of
the motor, calculation of the duty
point, assessment of the required
motor power, drawing pump
performance curves of individual
pump
in
order
to
make
recommendations
for
modification
/
repair
/
replacement
of
specific
components.
Figure E-1: Selection Parameters
The energy audit conducted under contract with GHK having reference TA NO 7321PAK: PREPARATION OF PUNJAB CITIES IMPROVEMENT INVESTMENT PROJECT (PCIIP)
with ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK (URBAN UNIT AND P & D DEPARTMENT) in the
continuation of Survey Report on Tubewells and Sewage Pumping Stations in Sialkot, an
industrial city located in the north east of Punjab near the Indian Border in Pakistan.
The study has been carried out in the form of individual site surveys with the help of
necessary gadgets for measuring the required operating parameters to adopt the strategy
of adjusting and optimizing energy requirements per unit of output by reducing the total
cost.
The survey is to estimate the energy cost of pumping water which is contributing heavily
in the overall expenditure of municipal and water authorities. The report is the part of the
studies, a pre-investment tool, to enable funding authorities for making a feasibility
J40252334
Page 1

Executive Summary
report of the project and optimum allocation of funds for improvement and r ehabilitation
of utilities in the city. Table E-1 is giving an overview on the total number of Tubewells
and their working schedule
Table E-1:
Total Number of Tubewells Inspected
Area
Cantt
TMA
Installed by Dept
Cantt
TMA
PHED
TMA
Equipment
Tube wells
Tube wells
Tube wells
Sewage Pump
Total
E.1
No. of wells
15
74
26
1
116
Daily Operating
Hrs
8
13
Findings & Suggestions During Survey
All the tube wells were visited and the necessary data was collected after installation of
flow meter, pressure gauge and power analyzer. The data collected was compared with
the data of equipment installed and individual performance curves of each pump were
drawn. It is observed that 13 pumps working in TMA are hardly adding 2.99 Cusecs into
the system and are not capable to perform any longer so are required to be replaced.
Similarly 33 pumps which are adding 36 Cusecs against their installed capacity of 49
Cusecs will only deliver 26 Cusecs next year. These pumps are required to be replaced
or refurbished as per their condition after pulling out and inspection.
The overall operative capacity of 149.5 Cusecs is only delivering 123.46 Cusec at the
moment and will deliver only 102 Cusec next year. The main reason is depleting water
table in the area which is at the moment at 70-80 ft and is likely to go down up to 80-90
feet in the coming 1-2 years. The pumps installed with 120, 130 and 140 ft head are not
capable to pump out enough water with the depleting water level. The other major factor
is installation of high head pumps of 200 and 250 ft in the same areas which are creating
resistance in the system especially at off peak hours. These high head pumps are also
damaging the borehole at the time of peak hours by producing more water than the
designed capacity of boreholes.
The measures advised will not only increase the overall discharge to the design level but
also ensure the overall energy saving of Rs. 16 Mio per annum with the increased
discharge. The output which is currently 4.8 M3/kW and likely to go to 3.94 M 3/kW after
1-2 year will come up to 5.94 M 3/kW after implementation of measure identified. The
overall energy saving is expected to be 30-40%.
Apart from the measure about replacement, refurbishment and repair, the me asures to
be taken against reactive power penalty will be having a saving of another Rs. 18 Mio
per annum. Table E-2 presents the short summary of the key Energy Conservation
Opportunities (ECOS) along with the measures advised to be taken while the details are
later in the report.
E.2
Graphical Representation of Potential Savings
By collecting data of operating parameters and review the conditions with the
maintenance staff of all Tubewells, 10 finding associated with energy savings and
improvement of value of service or productivity were identified. Against all findings
techno-economical solutions are offered. Implementation of given suggestions not only
decrease electricity demand but also reduce cost of service and improve operating
efficiency. The savings expected are 30 - 40% while the benefits of conserving available
resources and global environment protection are additional.
J40252334
Page 2

Table E-2:
Summary of Recommendations on Findings and Potential Saving

Estimation
ECO
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
Executive Summary
Findings on Current
Situation
Recommended Measures
Minimize the reactive power charges

No PFI Capacitorsinstalled
Training of operators and supervisory Staff Un Trained Operators
Minimizing Voltage unbalances
Voltage Fluctuation found
Preventive maintenance of equipment
No Preventive maintenance
installed
Monitoring of input and output:
No Pressure Gauges and Flow
Installation of metering devices for Power
Meters
input and flow and pressure output
Proper designing and adjustment of
equipment as per site condition and system Over and Under Designed
requirement.
Prevent Throttling of Pumps by impeller
Undersized delivery pipes
trimming
Procurement after necessary testing
Testing of equipment lacking
and qualification
Proper design of Distribution System
Undersized pipes dia and fittings
10 Appropriate size of motors

Total Potential Annual Saving
Total Potential Demand Reduction by Installation of
Water Meters at Consumer end
Potential Cost
Savings
Up
Up
Up
Up
to
to
to
to
12%
3%
2%
4%
Up to 10%
Up to 20%
Up to 5%
Up to 10%
Not Calculated
(not in scope)
Motors were big/small than required Up to 1%
Up to 30 %
No Metering at consumer end
30-40% as per
international studies.
Figure E-2 pie chart shows, "Expected Cost Savings" accounts for 30 - 40% of the total
consumption, provide a further breakdown and elaboration
Figure E-2:
Expected Saving Distribution
Motor Sizing, 1 ,
1%
Procurement, 10 ,
12%
Throttling, 5 ,
6%
Proper Design, 30
,
37%
E.3
Reactive Power,
12 , 16%
Training, 3 ,
4%
Voltage, 2 ,
3%
Maintenenace, 4 ,
5%
Reactive Power
Training
Voltage
Maintenenace
Monitoring
Proper Design
Throttling
Monitoring, 10 ,
12%
Procurement
Motor Sizing
Conclusion of Executive Summary
Adopting suggested measures as a routine or developing them as a culture gives life to

energy conservation in addition to improve water supply services by reducing losses and
increasing efficiency. It will ensure energy savings up to 30-40% which is equivalent to
Rs. 30 Mio per annum approximately. It also ensures the optimum output of water
against each kW consumed and increases the overall water production by 48 Cusecs. i.e.
from 102 cusecs to 150 Cusec.

J40252334
Page 3

1.0
Section 1
Introduction
INTRODUCTION
In 2009, ADB (Asian Development Bank); Urban Unit and P & D Department, passed
the Punjab Cities Improvement Investment Project (PCIIP) which contains funding for
rehabilitation of water and sewage infrastructure in Pakistan and the project
consultancy awarded to GHK under reference TA. No. 7321 PAK. GHK .
GHK promotes sustainable water infrastructure practices, makes recommendations
directed to energy efficiency, water efficiency, and green infrastructure so emphasis
is being paid on assisting water utilities and local authorities in vulnerability
assessments so that they are incorporated into infrastructure planning systems.
GHK believes that
Pumping System account for nearly 20% of the worlds electrical energy. In
Municipal Utility companies energy cost accounts for 40-60% of overall budget. In
bulk water supply pumping stations energy costs account for 70-80% of the total
costs.
The rising cost of energy is increasing the graveness of the situation and is growing
worst day by day. In Pakistan the electricity distribution companies are increasing the
electricity charges at the rate of 2% every month which is alarming indeed.
In this situation energy audit is an excellent way to obtain energy savings through
Improvements that optimize pumping systems to operate efficiently and effectively.
Energy conservation measures are expected to reduce the energy costs up to
handsome figure. In addition to this, implementation of energy conservation
measures will definitely improve consumer comfort and reduce operations and
maintenance costs.
All energy audit activities are performed as per TOR (Term of Reference), data of all
the necessary parameter collected by applying instruments, afterwards, verified and
analyzed Inferences were drawn and energy conservation measures defined by
adopting systematic approach for improving efficiency of water pumping operations.

J40252334
Page 4

2.0
Section 2
Location
LOCATION
Project capturing the energy audit of 115 Wells in Sialkot.
The city is about 5000 years old and the population of the Sialkot city (proper) is
about 500,000 while Population Density is 1160/km 2
From 115 tube wells visited in Sialkot, 74 are under Tehsil Municipal
Administration (TMA) while 26 are under Punjab Public & Health Engineering
Department (PHED) and 15 are under Cantonment Board.
Currently the maintenance of 100 tube wells is the responsibility of TMA while 15
tube wells are coming under responsibility of Sialkot Cantt.
Map of Punjab

J40252334
Page 5

Figure 2-1:
Section 2
Location
Map of Sialkot Showing Location of Tubewells
Source: Adapted from Urban Units base map. Survey undertaken by GHK team who visited each location marked in the map

J40252334
Page 6

3.0
Section 3
Terms of Reference
TERMS OF REFERENCE
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
(vii)
(viii)
(ix)
(x)
(xi)
(xii)
(xiii)
Study of pumps design and their operational characteristics.

Study of the Site Loads and match it with the installed Pumps.
Execution of Field performance tests for determination of Pumping
Machinery performance and measurement of the flow, head and efficiency
of the installed machinery.
Determining the system resistance and calculation of the duty point.
Identified expected energy saving on the basis of modifications that will
reduce the energy usage.
Prepared a rank-ordered list of appropriate modifications.
Measurement of actual energy consumed by each pump installed
Comparison of actual energy consumption with the designed energy
requirements of the pump installed
Assessment of the need of motor-power and comparison with the motor
installed.
Suggestions after evaluation of overall Water Supply System and
operation of Tubewells.
Preparation of a datasheet to document the analysis process and results.
Drawing of the Pump performance curve at site
Recommendation for modification! Repair/replacement of specific
components.
Performance objective for modification! Repair/replacement activity.
Comprehensive Study Elements

Part A Design Parameters
1. Pump Efficiency at Design Flow
and Head
2. Pump Performance Curve
3. Motor Rated Power
4. Motor Efficiency at Design Load
5. Motor Power Factor at Full Load
Part B Pump Behavior at Site
1. Measurement of Discharge
2. Measurement of Static Water Level
3. Measurement of Pumping Water
level
4. Computation of Draw Down
5. Computation of system head
6. Motor Power Factor at Duty Point
7. Measurement of Power inputs (Ampere, and Kw)
8. Measurement of Motor winding and Bearing temperature.
9. Measurement of Hydraulic Efficiency

J40252334
Page 7

4.0
Section 4
Methodology
METHODOLOGY
This section presents the "Work Plan and Methodology" adopted to
handle
the
entire
project
and
to
perform
various
assignments/activities according to our scope of work as described
in Terms of Reference. This has been based on our best
understanding of the project and experience on the assignments of
similar nature.
First the pumps were examined in the idle condition; fittings and free
running of the pumps were checked and noted under design
parameters in the given format. The Static water level and the
incoming power conditions were also verified.
After visual inspection the following equipment was installed and
readings were taken.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Flow Rate with ultrasonic flow meter.

Pumping water level with wired gauge inserted in the borehole
Head with the pressure gauge installed at the discharge head
Motor RPM with tachometer
Power Input with Power Analyzer. (Amp, Volts, Power input,
Factor)
6. Temperature with infrared temperature meter (Motor Upper and
Lower Bearings, Winding and Water Temp)
Total 5 reading were taken on the
fully opened valve (One reading),
partially closed valve (3 readings)
and completely closed valve (1
reading) and the pump curve is
drawn.
The curve drawn on the basis of
site data is compared with the
performance curve of the pump
manufacturer to determine pump
performance and proposing the
remedial measures.
All the tube wells were visited
between 8th November 2010 and 30 November 2010 and the data was recorded

J40252334
Page 8

5.0
Section 5
Reference of Annexure
REFERENCE OF ANNEXURE
Following 3 Annexure is part of the report to provide sufficient data about the
pump performance.
Annexure 1 Showing all the data of pump performance while operating in
system collectively as well as individually. It also contains the power
consumption, and power factor as well as the potential savings after
implementation of recommendations.
Annexure 2, Annexure 3, and Annexure 4 contain example data of TMA, PHED
and Cantt pump performance in 3 sheets. 1 st sheets shows the Name, type and
size of the pump, manufacturer name, pump and motor serial number as well as
the site performance comprising of flow rate, head, power absorbed, power
factor, efficiency of the pump and head at ground level. The 2nd pages shows
the pump performance curve and compare it with the pump manufacturer's
curve. Three different curves are provided to show flow rate versus head, pump
efficiency and power absorbed. On the 3rd page comparison between pump
present performance with the design performance and actually required pump
for the site as per present site conditions is made.
Energy Audit complete report with individual data of each pump is available on
the following web link.
http://pciip.ghkpak.com/reports/energy_audit_report.zip (10.7 MB)
Annexure 5 contain the pump data of Model Town pumping station, summarize
in three sheets as discussed in previous para.
Annexure 6 Contains the pump performance curves of the pump manufacturers.

J40252334
Page 9

6.0
Section 6
Utilities Analysis
UTILITIES ANALYSIS
Tube wells were visited between 8 th November
to 2nd December 2010 and the data collected
and compiled in order to calculate the total
energy consumption and to design the further
course of action in the context of rapidly
decreasing water level which has got down
from 40 Ft to 80 - 90 Ft in just a decade. On
the other side the electricity charges increased
from Rs. 2 to Rs.14 in the said time which
definitely raised the cost of per cubic meter of
water up to 12 to 15 times higher.
The TMA (Tehsil Municipal Administration) and Cantt (Cantonment Board) are
responsible for providing the water and sanitation facilities to the citizens of
Sialkot. The No of pumps being operated by the two departments are as under.
Table 6-1:
Number of Pumps Operated by Cantt and TMA
Area
Installed by Dept
Cantt
TMA
Equipment
No. of wells
Cantt
Tube wells
15
TMA
Tube wells
74
PHED
Tube wells
26
TMA
Sewage Pump
Total:
1
116
The pumps shown against the PHED are the pumps

newly installed in 2008-2010 by PHED (Public Health
Engineering Department) for TMA and are now being
operated by TMA.
Currently the water supply is not being provided 24
hours but intermittently. The supply hours for Cantt
operated tube wells are 8 hours per day and for TMA
operated tubewells are 13 hours per day. The overall
schedule of supply is as under.
Table 6-2:
Tube wells Operating Schedule
Daily Operating
Hours
1st Operating Time
2nd Operating Time
3rd Operating Time
Cantt
05:00 AM to 08:00 AM
11:00 AM to 02:00 PM
04:00 PM to 6:00 PM
TMA
13
05:00 AM to 10:00 AM

J40252334
12:00 Noon to 08:00 PM
Page 10

7.0
Section 7
Non Operational Tubewells
NON OPERATIONAL TUBEWELLS

Out of 115 Tube wells installed, only 98 are currently operational. 17 Tubewells are
non-operational currently because of the following reasons.
Table 7-1:
Reason of Non Operational Tube wells

Tube Wells Serial Nr
Qty
(Non Operational)
Not yet commissioned

Abandoned
TMA
PHED
8
12
1
1
Transformer Fault
Not yet commissioned
TMA
6
20,21,22,23,24,25
1
6
14
29,44
26, 43
2
2
MCU Problem
Pump Problem
57
68
1
1
Transformer and Cable
74
TMA Total:
1
15
Grand Total:
17
Area Reasons (of non operational)

CANTT
Motor Burnt
Transformer Fault
Bore Collapsed
Figure 7-1 showing the reasons and the number of pumps which are non operational
and their further distribution in order to understand major cause
Figure 7-1: Non Operational Pumps (Graphical Form)
Pump Problem,
1
Transformer and
Cable, 1
Not Yet
Commissioned,
7
MCU Problem, 1
Bore Collapsed,
2
Transformer
Fault, 3
Motor Burnt, 1

J40252334
Abandoned, 1
Page 11

8.0
Section 8
Operational Tubewells and Their Capacity
OPERATIONAL TUBEWELLS AND THEIR CAPACITY

The operational 98 pumps are capable of producing 146.5 Cusec instead of giving
their design capacity of 174 Cusecs while 1 Sewage disposal pump installed at
Model Town Disposal Station is capable of producing 3 Cusec.
Mismatch between equipment capacity and requirement leads to in-efficiencies
due to part load operations, operation apart from Best Efficiency point, wastages
etc. optimization is the energy audit mandate that involves the graceful matching
of energy equipment capacity with the end - use needs.
When two or more than two pumps are being operated in the same location or
nearby but with the different heads, the pressure creates in the main line by high
pressure pump may not let the other pump give its flow with low head.
Table 8-1 and Figure 8-1 Showing the designed Capacity of the installed pumps
along with operational Capacity in order to make a clear picture of current
situation prevailing
Table 8-1:
Design Capacity of Installed Pumps Vs Operational Capacity of

Pumps
Area
Installed Capacity
Nrs
Cusec
Operational Capacity
Nrs
Design Cusecs
WATER SUPPLY
Cantt
PHED
15
26
22
39
13
19
20
28.5
TMA
Total:
74
115
110
171
66
98
98
146.5
Grand Total:
1
116
3
174
1
99
3
149.5
SEWAGE
Disposal
Figure 8-1:
Installed Capacity Vs Operational Capacity (Graphical form)
120
110
98
100
74
80
66
60
Cantt
39
40
26
15
20
13
1
PHED
28.5
22
19
TMA
20
Disposal
1
0
Installed Capacity
NRS

J40252334
Operational
Capacity
Installed Capacity
Operational
Capacity
Cusec
Page 12

9.0
Section 9
Recommendation Regarding Depleting Water Level
RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DEPLETING WATER LEVEL
Keeping in view the above mentioned situation, it is recommended that the tube wells
having design head 120, 130, 135 Ft should immediately be replaced with new pumps
of 150 Head.
When two or more than two pumps are being
operated in the same location or nearby but
with the different heads, the pressure creates
in the main line by high pressure pump may
not let the other pump give its flow with low
head.
One the other hand the installation of very
high head pumps in the same system is
restricting the low head pumps to give
substantial output and it is possible that the low head pump may not produce at all
when a high head pump is also operating in the same zone. This phenomenon should
be minimized by curtailing and adjusting the head of high head pumps of 200 and 250
Ft in the same zone to 150 Ft Head

J40252334
Page 13

Section 10
Non Contributing Tubewells
10.0 NON CONTRIBUTING TUBEWELLS

For optimum operation in the municipalities where direct pumping is involved, the
pressure head at the ground level should be between 1.5 to 2.5 bar depending on
the performance parameters of the utility provider and topography of the area to be
served.
Furthermore, It has been observed during the survey that pumps with the head
varying from 120 to 250 Feet have been installed in the same zone which cannot
contribute the required flow as was calculated in the very beginning.
Therefore, some of the present tube wells given in the Fig 2.1 with the existing
design parameters will not be capable of producing at all when operated in the
system while some of the present tube wells will reduce their discharge less than 1
Cusec against the installed discharge of 1.5 Cusec as given Fig 2.2
Table 10-1: TMA Pumps Not Adding in the System
Tube
Well
No.
2
3
36
46
50
61
62
64
66
67
69
70
71
Site Name
Naya mayana Pura
Muzafar Pur (Grave Yard)
RangpuraSaheenPura
Haider Park
Babey Bairey mohallah
Khamaran
Shahab Pura near Darbar
Shah Monga WaIl
Haji pura Bin No 1
Kacha Shahab road Marianwala
Ghos pura tanky
Fatheh Garh graveyard
FathehGarhomertown
Fatheh Garh agency chowk
Present
Design
Year of
Discharge
Discharge
Installation
at 1.5 Bar
Cusec
Cusec
1990
1.5
0.78
2003
1.5
0.00
1996
1.5
0.74
2004
1.5
0.00
Discharge at
1.5 Bar after
Water Level 90
Cusec
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1991
1.5
0.00
0.00
2001
1993
1982
1993
1993
1988
2004
1993
Total:
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1
1.5
19
0.78
0.69
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.99
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.1 Recommendation for Non-Contributing Tubewells

Pumps Installed at following TMA sites are not capable to add any flow when the
system head exceeds 1.5 Bar. It is advised that these pumps should be replaced
immediately. Till the replacement, it is advisable not to operate at Off Peak Hours

J40252334
Page 14

Section 11
Pumps for Rehabilitation
11.0 PUMPS FOR REHABILITATION

Following pumps are required to be rehabilitated in order to obtain the designed
productivity in the perspective of depleting water level expected during very next
year. Corrective action for rehabilitation is mentioned in the relevant annexure.
Table 11-1: Pumps Required to be Upgraded/ Refurbished
Sr.
No.
Tubewell Name
Design
Discharge
Cusec
Design
Head
Ft
Present
Discharge
at 1.5 Bar
Cusec
Discharge at
1.5 Bar after
Water Level
90Cusec
TMA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Kotli behram
Khagara Darbar (Kashmir Road)
Model Town Tanky
Model town capital road
Mubarik pura
Noor pura Hakeem Khadim Ali road
Nasir road
Roadas Road Makki Masjid
Pak pura
PremNagarAbetroad
Poran Nagar Gali No 3
Muhammad Pura Tanky
Anwar Club
Shah Saidan school
Taj Pura
Daraarayan
College Road
Raja road
Islam pura near mosque
ZafarAbad
Rang pura New Pir Bashir
Rangpora Ban Pura
Rangpora Barian Lambian Pura
Rangpora Awanan Pura
Islaam Abad
Tiba Kakey Zaian Qabrastan
Habib pura Aman Abad
Habib pura Chugain
Chah gondlan
Shahab Pura Tanky
Haji pura Mai sabran
Kotli Loharan East
TMA Total:
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.00
47.5
140
120
140
130
150
130
130
120
120
120
135
135
120
120
130
130
130
130
130
130
120
160
130
130
130
130
135
130
130
130
140
120
0.88
0.88
1.08
0.98
1.27
1.47
1.27
0.88
1.23
1.47
1.27
1.23
0.88
1.08
0.88
0.88
1.32
1.08
1.18
0.98
1.13
1.08
1.47
1.08
1.08
1.08
0.98
1.18
0.69
1.08
1.08
0.69
34.76
0.78
0.78
0.88
0.78
0.98
0.98
0.98
0.74
0.78
0.98
0.98
0.78
0.78
0.88
0.88
0.78
0.78
0.88
0.98
0.88
0.98
0.49
0.98
0.69
0.88
0.88
0.83
0.93
0.59
0.78
0.69
0.49
26.5
Ahahta Water Works No 1

PHED Total:
1.50
1.50
3.00
200
200
0.98
0.98
1.96
0.69
0.49
1.18
2.00
150
1.37
0.83
38.21
28.51
PHED
1
2
CANTT
3
Fire Brigade Station Ward No. 5,

Sadar
Total:

J40252334
52.50
Page 15

Section 11
Fig 11-1, 11-2, 11-3 and 11.4 are showing the prominent decrease of water
availability expected during next year due to depleted ground water level
Figure 11-1: TMA Tube wells Present and Next Year Discharge
2.00
1.80
1.60
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 28 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Flow at 1.5 Bar 2

Flow at 1.5 Bar after Water Level 90 2
Present Average
Next Year Average
Figure 11-2: Remaining TMA Tubewells Present and Next Year Discharge
2.00
1.80
1.60
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
37 38 39 40 41 42 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 69 70 71 72

J40252334
Flow at 1.5 Bar 2
Present Average
Next Year Average
Page 16

Section 11
Figure 11-3: PHED Tube wells Present and Next Year Discharge
2.00
1.80
1.60
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
1
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
26
Flow at 1.5 Bar 2
Present Average
Next Year Average
Figure 11-4: Cantt Board Tube wells Present and Next Year Discharge
2.20
2.00
1.80
1.60
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
1

J40252334
10
11
13
14
Flow at 1.5 Bar 2
Present Average
Next Year Average
15
Page 17

Section 12
Electricity Analysis
12.0 ELECTRICITY ANALYSIS

During Survey Power Factor (ratio of the actual
power consumed by the equipment to the power
supplied to the equipment) measured, Motor
rating and Motor Control Units (MCU5) were also
analyzed to make the clear picture of electricity
consumption behavior.
In our studies, we are also providing the current
power factor of the individual site to find out the
energy saving potential.
Table 12-1 & Table 12-2 represents the present capability against working hours
and the total outflow that is 152,360 M3 with an average input of 4.8 M 3/KW
Table 12-1:
Present consumption of Electricity
Operational
Capacity
Area
Nrs
Cantt
PHED
TMA
Disposal
Grand Total:
13
19
66
1
99
Design
Cusecs
20
28.5
98
3
149.5
Pump in Operation
Actual
Present
Present Discharge
Consumption per
at 1.5 Bar
cusec
Actual
Power
Input
kW
Cusec
398
613.60
1,566.40
16.50
2,594.64
kW
22.25
29.97
68.24
03.00
123.46
17.88
20.47
22.96
05.50
Table 12-2: Position of total Discharge per kW consumed

Area
Cantt
PHED
TMA
Disposal
Grand Total:
12.1
DOH
8
13
13
13
Output M3
Input KW
18,156
39,740
90,486
3,978
152,360
3,184
7,977
20,363
215
31,738
M3/KW
5.70
4.98
4.44
18.55
4.80
Energy Trend with Depleting Water Level

The water level in the area is depleting rapidly and at
some places it is already more than 80 Ft which is a
real alarming situation. Although, last monsoon heavy
rainfall affected the conditions positively but it will not
be the same for a long time and we are afraid that the
water level in the area is expected to reach at 80-90 Ft
in the coming summer. Then the overall condition will
be as under.
Table 12-3 & Table 12-4 says that with the above
mentioned impact and working hours the total discharge will be 18% reduced to
125,046 M3 with an average input of 3.94 M3/ KW

J40252334
Page 18

Table 12-3:
Section 12
Next Year Position after 80-90 Ft Water Level

Pump in Operation
Operational
Capacity
Area
Design
Cusecs
Nrs
Cantt
PHED
TMA
Disposal
Grand Total
Table 12-4:
13
19
66
1
99
20
28.5
98
3
149.5
Expected
Power
Input
Expected discharge
in 1-2 Years at 1.5 Bar
kW
Cusec
398
613.60
1,566.40
16.50
2,621.64
Estimated
Consumption per
cusec
kW
20.09
26.46
52.48
3.00
103.51
18.45
23.19
29.85
5.50
Next Year Position of Discharge per kW consumed
Area
Cantt
PHED
TMA
Disposal
Grand Total
DOH
Output M3
8
13
13
13
M 3/KW
Input KW
16,393
35,086
69,588
3,978
125,046
3,184
7,977
20,363
215
31,739
5.15
4.40
3.42
18.55
3.94
12.1.1 Recommendation regarding Electricity

Losses due to voltage fluctuations, poor power factor, throttling of pumps, inefficient motors or inadequate motor sizes can be curbed by improving power
factor with the help of capacitors, trimming of impellers where heads are high and
installation of correctly sized motors (individual recommendations are in the
relevant annexure and detail is in the Energy management plan)
12.1.2 Energy Behavior after implementation of recommendations
By equalizing the pumps behavior the overall reduction in the electr icity can be
achieved which also optimize the output from the individual pump while operating
in the system. The more conservation can be achieved by load management that
is switching off the pumps when they are not needed after analyzing the required
pressure with the help of pressure gauges at all sites.
Table 12-5: Expected performance of the pumps after Implementation of
Recommendations.
Pump in Operation
Area
Cantt
PHED
TMA
Disposal
Grand Total
Operational
Capacity
Nrs Design Cusecs

13
20
19
28.5
66
98
1
3
99
149.5
Power input
required
after Adjustment
kW
349.18
497.58
1,710.99
11.97
2,587.18
Output Flow in 12 Years at 1.8 Bar
Cusec
20.0
28.5
98.0
3.0
149.5
Estimated
Consumption
per cusec
kW
17.46
17.46
17.46
3.99
Table 12-6; Position of Discharge per kW consumed after Implementation of

Recommendations
Cantt
PHED
TMA
Disposal
Grand Total:

J40252334
DOH
8
13
13
13
M3
17,136
37,791
129,948
3,978
188,853
KW
M3/KW
2,933
6,469
22,243
156
31,800
5.84
5.84
5.84
25.56
5.94
Page 19

Section 12
Only the advised modification, of replacing low head pumps and decreasing the
pressure of high head pumps, will reduce the 33% energy consumption per M3 and
the system will be capable to produce 5.94 M3/kW instead of 3.94 M3/ kW. Figure
12-1 shows the discharge trend of operational pumps with Vs without
implementation of recommendations
Figure 12-1: Future Discharge Trend in Graphical Form
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Disposal
TMA
PHED
Cantt
Present
Next Year
After Implementation
Discharge of Water from Operational Pumps
12.2
Energy Consumption Analysis

As per site observations and measurement, energy consumption is found high
in the following pumps due to specific reasons in which more prominent
encountered was inappropriate designing and low efficiency .
Table 12-7:
Tube
Well
No.
TMA
3
9
11
12
15
19
22
30
34
35
37
42
45
52
53
54
55
58
64
69
70
72
Extraordinary Energy Consumption

Tube well Name

Mubarik pura
Nasir road
Prem Nagar Abet road
Anwar Club
Daraarayan
Ahmad Pura Naya
Rangpora Ban Pura
Haji Pura near Kothi school
Islaam Abad
Habib pura Chugain
Amam Sahib Number 2
Chah gondlan
Saraie Bahabrian No 1
Haji pura Bin No 1
Fatheh Garh omer town
Kotli Loha ran East
Total TMA:

J40252334
Year of
Installation
2003
1998
1992
1991
1986
1999
1972
1997
2008
1995
1995
2003
2005
2003
1997
1995
1997
2003
1982
1988
2004
Energy Cost
Difference
with a Suitable
pump Rs. '000
Reason
194 low design head / In Efficient

225 Degraded / In Efficient
421 low design head / Worn out
175 low design head/Worn out
114 Degraded / In Efficient
548 High design head
410 low design head
435 High design head / In Efficient
288 High design head / In Efficient
6,193
Page 20

PHED
1
2
3
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Section 12
Islamia Park
Shabudin Park
Haji pura bin no 2
Muzafar Pur defence road
Roaras road Burna sports
Namiana pura Qabrastan
Raamtalli
Shah China
Behar Colony
Fatheh Garh Dara arayan tanky
Shjah Abad No 3
Rangpura lanky
Chahtar Khanan
Tehseel Bazar
Ghod pur road
Total PHED:
CANTT
1
Fire Brigade Station
3
Near Jamia Masjid
4
Mirza Abdur Rauf Road
5
Mohallah Qasab road
6
Iqbal Colony Ghazi Pur Road
7
Pakistan Chowk 9
Regement Bazar 11
Askari Coloney No.1 13
Tariq Road Ward No.7 14
Qasim road near Church Total Cantt:
Disposal Station
1
Model Town Disposal Station
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
340
119
199
703
613
381
286
518
311
567
371
664
803
319
241
418
385
7,238
High design head / In Efficient

In Efficient / In Efficient
1980
1990
1983
1993
1983
1994
1994
1996
2007
2007
168
216
206
317
257
404
236
360
349
227
2,740
Degraded / Worn out

Worn out / In Efficient
Degraded / Worn out
Degraded / Worn out
218
12.2.1 Recommendations against Extra Energy Consumption Tubewells.

Following pumps are consuming extraordinary excess energy amounting Rs. 16
Mio. Per annum, and are required to be adjusted / refurbished / redesigned / and
replaced as recommended in the individual datasheet of the respective pump in
Annex
Figure 12-2: Energy Saving Potential:
Disposal, 218
Cantt Board, 2740
TMA, 6193
TMA
PHED
Cantt Board
Disposal
PHED, 7238

J40252334
Page 21

12.3
Section 12
Power Factor on Site

Power factor correction saves money, reduces power bills by minimizing losses in
conductors in return lessen loading on transformers which improve voltage drops
too.
PF below 0.9 is considered low and indicates the potential for savings. When PF is
.085 or below, as is the case looking hereunder, losses are significant.
If PF is less than 0.95 or specified limit over the billing period, generally penalty of
the difference of power factor from 1 is charged in the bill amount, because it is
mandatory to maintain PF to the specified limit. Improving PF above the specified
limit is useful for conservation of electricity .
Table 12-8: Power Factor of TMA Pumps
Tube
Well
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
27
28
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
Area
Tube well Name
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
Mohallah Cheela Pura

Naya mayana Pura Near Kothi Mian Saeed
Kotli behram
Khagara Darbar (Kashmir Road)
Model Town Tanky
Model Town Muradia road
Model town capital road
Mubarik pura
Noor pura Hakeem Khadim Ali road
Nasir road
Pak pura
Prem Nagar Abet road
Poran Nagar Gali No 3
MuhammadPuraTanky
Nishat park paris road
Anwar Club
Shah Saidan school
Taj Pura
Dara arayan
Green Town Street
Bara-e- Qilla Darbar pir muradia
College Road
Raja road
Maha Raja road
Shah Khaki Wali
ZafarAbad
Amanat Pura
Ahmad Pura Naya
RangpuraSaheenPura
Rangpora Ban Pura
Rangpora Barian Lambian Pura
Rangpora Awanan Pura

J40252334
Power
Factor
0.84
0.84
0.84
0.93
0.93
0.83
0.78
0.75
0.91
0.82
0.81
0.6
0.91
0.88
0.88
0.84
0.91
0.81
0.81
0.87
0.76
0.83
0.83
0.94
0.82
0.8
0.86
0.85
0.82
0.87
0.78
0.86
0.74
0.75
0.91
0.81
Expected
Annual Penalty
in Rs'OOO
191
191
191
35
35
209
296
348
70
226
244
609
70
122
122
191
70
244
244
139
331
209
209
17
226
261
157
174
226
139
296
157
365
348
70
244
Page 22

Tube
Well
No.
40
41
42
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
69
70
71
72
73
Power
Factor
Area
Tube well Name
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
TMA
Neqa pora Kocha Shaikan

Neqa pora shah deena
Haji Pura near Kothi school
lslaam Abad
Haider Park
Tiba Kakey Zaian Qabrastan
Kashmiri Mohallah
BabeyBairey
Babey Bairey mohallah Khamaran
Babey Bairey Alshamas street
Habib pura Chugain
Amam Sahib Number 2
Chah gond lan
Shawala Park no 1
Saraie Bahabrian No 1
Saraie Bahabrian near Ahmadia school
ShahabPuralanky
Shahab Pura near Darbar
Shah Monga Wali
Factory Area
Haji pura Bin No 1
Haji pura Mai sabran
Kacha Shahab road Marian wala
Ghos pura tanky
FathehGarhomertown
Fatheh Garh agency chowk
Kotli Loharan East
Kotli Loharan West
Total TMA:
Table 12-9:
Tube
Well
No.
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
26
Section 12
Area
PHED
PHED
PHED
PHED
PHED
PHED
PHED
PHED
PHED
PHED
PHED
PHED
PHED
PHED
PHED
PHED
PHED
PHED
PHED
Power Factor of PHED Pumps

Power
Factor
Tube well Name

Islamia Park
Muhammad Pura Kanga Bebian
Shabudin Park
Haji pura bin no 2
Muzafar Pur defence road
Roarasroad Burnasports
Namiana pura Qabrastan
Raamtalli
Shah China
Behar Colony
Fatheh Garh Dara arayan tanky
Shjah Abad No 3
Rangpura lanky
Chahtar Khanan
Tehseel Bazar
Ghod pur road
Bohri Muhallah
0.84
0.86
0.81
0.84
0.89
0.79
0.82
0.83
0.81
0.78
0.79
0.82
0.84
0.84
0.85
0.93
0.86
0.85
0.85
Total PHED:

J40252334
0.88
0.88
0.92
0.84
0.82
0.87
0.92
0.71
0.66
0.8
0.89
0.83
0.79
0.85
0.84
0.89
0.89
0.82
0.88
0.79
0.8
0.82
0.87
0.99
0.89
0.84
0.78
0.78
0.63
0.71
Expected
Annual Penalty
in Rs'OOO
122
122
52
191
226
139
52
418
505
261
104
209
278
174
191
104
104
226
122
278
261
226
139
0
104
191
197
296
371
418
13,355
Expected
Annual Penalty
in Rs'OOO
191
157
244
191
104
278
226
209
244
296
278
226
191
191
174
35
157
174
174
3,740
Page 23

Section 12
Table 12-10: Power Factor of Cantt Pumps

Sr #
Area
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
13
14
15
Cantt
Cantt
Cantt
Cantt
Cantt
Cantt
Cantt
Cantt
Cantt
Cantt
Cantt
Cantt
Cantt
Power
Factor
Tube well Name

Fire Brigade Station Ward No. 5, Sadar
Jinnah High School Ward No. 5, Sadar Near Jamia Masjid Ward No.5, Sadar Mirza Abdur Rauf Road Ward No.4, Sadar Mohallah Qasab road Ward No.6, Sadarlqbal Colony Ghazi Pur Road Ward No.6, Sadar
Pakistan Chowk Regement Bazar near Cantonment Area Lalkurti Bazar Askari Coloney No.1 l a r i q Road Ward No.7 QasimroadnearChurchNo.12Fazal-e-Qadir Road Total Cantt
0.89
0.83
0.93
0.93
0.88
0.73
0.82
0.9
0.96
0.83
0.82
0.77
0.76
Expected
Annual Penalty
in Rs'OOO
86
128
21
29
75
314
139
54
0
86
93
193
203
1,420
Table 12-11: Power Factor of Disposal Pumps

Sr.
No.
1
Area
Expected
Annual Penalty
in Rs'OOO
183
Power
Factor
Tube well Name
Disposal Model Town Disposal Station
0.72
Figure 12-3: Detail of Power Factor and Expected Annual Penalty

Disposal, 183
Cantt, 1420
TMA
PHED
PHED, 3740
Cantt
Disposal
TMA, 13355
12.3.1 Recommendation for Improving Power Factor:

To improve power factor, Capacitors of relevant sizes are advised. Capacitors supply,
for free, the reactive energy required by inductive load. Capacitors size can easily be
calculated by applying mathematical formulas
12.4
Important to understand Energy Cost

Understanding energy cost is imperative for
awareness purpose but it cannot be translated in
the form of calculating numbers from the electricity
bills.

J40252334
Page 24

Section 12
Energy efficiency savings can therefore be realized even with increased flows (for
example, a municipal water utility being able to provide water service for poor urban
inhabitants or expand the hours during which water is available), reduction of non
operating hours or regular water availability through the system thus total energy
consumption may increase but service will also increase and get better.
The pressure on water and energy resources is growing rapidly due to a increased
demand of potable water, unplanned growth of cities and on the other hand
inefficiencies prevailing throughout the municipal water utilities.
It is also possible that despite, reducing energy consumption of particular unit, overall
energy consumption may increase, but service will also be increased and improved
in many folds by giving benefit to all inhabitants of the city.
Keeping in view the potential demand for affordable, clean water in the context of
sustainable rehabilitation of infrastructure, the advised recommendations will assume
that any increase in water delivered is simply meeting that enhanced demand.
The increased demand would have needed new tube wells for meeting basic service
requirement, but after implementing the advised proposals if the demand of more
tube wells is not realized, it is also the form of saving investment and energy as well.
Therefore, energy savings in municipal utilities can never always be interpreted in the
form of reducing electricity bills but can be gauged by the satisfaction of the end user
and reduction for the requirement of new water schemes by making old tube wells
more productive.
This assertion is based on a thorough review of the design of the pumps, their
behavior, fieldwork with municipalities, measuring necessary parameter with the help
of gadgets and then making inferences on that screened data in the background of
utilities infrastructure

J40252334
Page 25

Section 13
Energy Management Plan
13.0 ENERGY MANAGEMENT PLAN

On the basis of factual data collected during site survey in the context of site
condition some inferences are drawn which are leading us towards some
recommendations for energy management going to be proved the strong
ground for taking some measures in order to conserve the resources.
13.1
ECO 1: Improved Motor Control Panels

Flow of electricity should be inspected for its continuous flow to make all wells
operative along with the power factor improvement.
Power factor is the ratio of working power to apparent power. It measures how
effectively electrical power is being used. Electrical equipments require the
formation of a magnetic field to operate transformer applications. It contribute
to the total power consumed but does not put in to the total power . A high
power factor ensures efficient utilization of electrical power, while a low power
factor indicates poor utilization of electrical power. Inductive loads like
transformers, electric motors, and lighting may cause a low power factor.
PF is thus a general measure of efficiency for electrical equipments. The PF
ratio is commonly expressed in percentage, PF of 0.95, means that only 5% of
the power drawn is reactive and thus not useful. Although it is quite common, a
PF below 0.9 is considered low and indicates the potential for savings. When
PF is 0.85 or below, as is the cases in Pakistan like other developing countries,
losses are significant.
If PF is less than 0.95 or specified limit over the billing period, generally penalty
of the difference of power factor from 1 is charged in the bill amount, because it
is mandatory to maintain PF to the specified limit.
Improving PF above the specified limit is useful for conservation of electricity.
Thus PF can be improved without casting any adverse effect on motors but
would decrease the electricity consumption .
13.1.1 Recommendations :
Capacitors bring the PF to a higher level would increase the ratio of useful
power to total power and would yield substantial improvements in overall
electrical efficiency.
PF improvement will eliminate the penalty and reduce the electricity bill of TMA,
PHED and Cantt Board Tube wells upto 12% which will cause the saving of
approx. Rs. 18 Mio per annum
13.2
ECO 2: Awareness Raising And Education

Awareness and training programs can provide considerable potential for energy
savings. Staff should be given trainings as practical tools to promote energy
literacy and encouraging action for learning right way of operating installed
machines as per site conditions and requirement.

J40252334
Page 26

Section 13
Awareness raising and education for the best practices of utility operations is
as important to the municipal utility sector as the investment at the initial time is
counting essential.
Operator behaviour can have a significant
effect on the effectiveness of energy efficiency
measures. During the off peak hours when the
demand reduces, the system pressure
increases. This aspect can easily be
monitored by installing pressure gauges on the
delivery pipe. Simply turning off equipment
when it is not substantially adding into the
system at the time of already high existing
pressure in the system especially at off-peak hours can provide an easy way of
saving both energy and money.
13.2.1 Recommendations:
The operators should be instructed for switching off their respective pumps
when the system pressure increases from a certain limit. This limit can be given
after studying the area topography. Generally it should be 1.5 to 2 Bar. If the
system pressure is already 1.5 to 2 Bar then there is no need to switch on
another pump.
Switching off the pumps, when there is no system requirement, will help in
saving up to 5%.
The workshops or training sessions can be conducted by the department or at
the premises of equipment manufacturer just with the investment of time and
should be considered a pre-requisite at the induction time of the operating staff.
13.3
ECO3: Minimizing Voltage Unbalances

A voltage unbalance degrades the performance and
shortens the life of three-phase motors. A voltage
unbalance causes a current unbalance, which will
result in torque pulsations, increased vibration and
mechanical stress, increased losses, and motor
overheating, which can reduce the life of a motor's
winding insulation. Voltage unbalances may be
caused by faulty operation of power factor correction
equipment, an unbalanced transformer bank, or an
open circuit. A rule of thumb is that the voltage
unbalance at the motor terminals should not exceed
1% although even a 1% unbalance will reduce motor
efficiency at part load operation. A 2.5% unbalance
will reduce motor efficiency at full load operation.
The voltage unbalance in the Sialkot lies between 2% to 5%.
By regularly monitoring the voltages at the motor terminal and through regular
thermo graphic inspections of motors, voltage unbalances may be identified. It is
J40252334
Page 27

Section 13
also recommended to verify that single-phase loads are uniformly distributed

and to install ground fault indicators as required
13.4
ECO 4: Adequate Maintenance

Inadequate maintenance causes pumps to
wear out quickly which lowers pump system
efficiency and increases power requirement
and in turn energy cost.
Better maintenance will reduce these
problems and save energy.
A simple maintenance program to ensure
that all components of the equipment are
operating well at peak performance can
result in substantial savings.
On average the possible energy savings are
estimated at 10% with an average payback
time of 1-2 Months.
Proper maintenance of Deepwell Turbine
pumps includes the following,
Replacement of worn impellers.
Column Shafts Bearing inspection and
repair.
Inspection and replacement of Gland
packing.
Pump/motor alignment check.
The largest opportunity is usually to avoid throttling losses.
Motor Bearing lubrication replacement, once annually or semi annually.
Any pump optimization project provides an
opportunity to update operation and
maintenance practices. Vibration analysis
can determine if problems are developing in
the pump or motor bearings. Vibration and
various electrical test methods can evaluate
the motor stator and rotor health. Where oil
lubrication is used, oil analysis can indicate
bearing condition. Routine maintenance,
such as valve overhauls, heat exchanger
cleaning, and mechanical joint repair, can
further improve system efficiencies
13.5
ECO 5: Monitoring
Monitoring in conjunction with operations and maintenance can be used to
detect problemsand determine solutions to create a more efficient system.
Monitoring can determine clearances that need to be adjusted, indicate
blockage, impeller damage, inadequate suction, operation outside preferences,
clogged pumps or pipes, or worn out pumps.

J40252334
Page 28

Section 13
Monitoring should include:
Wear monitoring
Vibration analyses
Pressure and flow monitoring
Current or power monitoring
Differential head and temperature rise
Distribution
system
inspection
for
contaminant build-up
13.5.1 Recommendations
Recommended necessary gadget to be installed on each site includes.
1) Pressure Gauges in the quantity of 2 Nos with Ball Valve to cut off. One
between discharge head and Sluice Valve and one after sluice Valve
2) Flow Meter in the quantity of 1 No on line
3) Ampere Meter in the quantity of 1 No with Selector Switch.
4) Volt Meter in the quantity of 1 No with Selector Switch.
5) Water Level Sensor in the quantity of1 No. along with dry Running Protection
Device
13.6
ECO 6: Adequate Design Parameters

Defining correct design parameters is the essence
of least energy cost.
These parameters include the duty point that is
flow rate and head, column setting, diameters of
the column pipes, minimum required efficiency of
the pump and motor and the correct size of the
motor.
For optimum operation in the municipalities where
direct pumping is involved, the pressure head at the ground level should be
between 1.5 to 2.5 bar depending on the performance parameters of the utility
provider and topography of the area to be served.
It has been observed during the survey that pumps with the head varying from
120 to 250 Feet have been installed in the same zone which cannot contribute
the required flow as was calculated in the very beginning.
It is recommended that pumps of same head should
be installed in a system.
With the depleting water level in the area it is
observed that current pumping water level is 70-80
ft which is expected to be going further down so
leads to starvation.
So it is strongly recommended to increase the column length of all the Tube
wells installed in the Sialkot to enable them keep operative in future.
J40252334
Page 29

Section 13
It is further recommended that the housing length of the new drilled Tube wells
should also be increased from 120 Ft to 150 Ft for new boreholes.
Following design parameters are also being recommended for Pumps to be
installed.
Capacity -----Head ----------Column Setting
Motor Rating -
1.5 Cusecs
150 Ft
110 Ft
4OHP
These advised specifications are applicable for all sites except elevated areas
13.7
ECO 7: Preventing Throttling Of Pumps

During operation, should motor gets overloaded, normally
field officer resorts to throttling of pump to avoid overloading
of motor. Due to throttling, operating point is shifted which
though prevented overloading of the motor, but the
discharge is also reduced resulting in operation for more
number of pumping hours to meet the same demand and
therefore, results in increase in energy consumption. The
operation is also generally at low efficiency and
consequently cause increased energy cost. Hence, such
throttled operation should be avoided.
Trimming of the impeller's diameter or reduction of pump
speed will shift the operating point which in turn reduces the amount of energy
imparted to the pumped fluid; as a result, the pump's flow rate and pressure
both decreases. A smaller or trimmed impeller can thus be used efficiently in
applications in which the current impeller is consuming extra energy.
If the impeller is trimmed by the relationship given in reliable books on pumps
can serve the same purpose and can prevent the overloading of motor with the
less power requirement corresponding to throttled operation.
In the Sialkot City Cantt Area tube wells are being throttled by installing
relatively smaller diameter delivery pipes. In all the cases, 6 inch diameter pipe
line has been used for 1.5 and 2 Cusec pumps which is adding unnecessary
resistance to flow and which should be avoided .
13.8
ECO 8: Procurement of Right Pumps

Pump efficiency may degrade 10% to 25% in its lifetime.
Industry experts however point out that this degrading
performance is not necessarily due to the aging of the pump
but can also be caused by variation in the site parameters
which may have caused a mismatch between the pump
capacity and its site requirement. Nevertheless, it can
sometimes be more effective to buy a new suitable pump
instead of keep on operating a wrongly selected pump.

J40252334
Page 30

Section 13
A number of pumps are available for specific pressure head and flow rate
capacity requirements. Choosing the right pump often saves both in operating
costs and in capital costs.
Better understanding of site parameters and operating conditions can leads
towards the better definition of design parameters and eventually procurement
of right product.
A pump may be incorrectly sized for current needs if it operates under throttled
conditions, has high re-circulated flow rate, or has a flow rate that varies more
than 30% from its best efficiency point flow rate. Where peak loads can be
reduced, pump size can also be reduced. A smaller motor will however not
always result in energy savings, as these depend on the load of the motor. Only
if the larger motor operates at a low efficiency, replacement may result in energy
savings. Pump loads may be reduced with alternative pump configurations and
improved operations and management practices.
When pumps are dramatically oversized, speed can be reduced with gear or belt
drives or a slower speed motor. This practice, however, is not common.
Paybacks for implementing these solutions are less than one year. Oversized
and throttled pumps that produce excess pressure are excellent candidat es for
impeller replacement or "trimming," to save energy and reduce costs. Correcting
for pump over sizing can save 15% to 25% of electricity consumption for
pumping equipment.
Oversized multistage pumps with high pressure can also be corrected by
reduction of stages of keeping one or 2 stages blind (without impellers).
Undersized pumps are even more inefficient than the oversized pumps. The
pumps with low pressure output are not capable of delivering in the system.
Undersized pumps can be corrected by changing of impellers where possible or
increase of speed, or replacement of pumps with other suitable pumps.
In the Sialkot area all the pumps installed with 120, 130, 135, 140 Ft head are
required to be replaced with the pumps of 150 Ft Head.3.
All the pumps installed with 200 and 250 Ft head are required to be adjusted for
150 Ft head.
13.9
ECO 09: Proper Distribution System

Pipes and fittings (Valves, reducers,
bends) must be sized correctly for optimal
performance and for less friction loss in
the system. Inadequate pipe sizing can
cause pressure losses, increase leaks
and increase generating costs
Proper Distribution system not only
enhance the reliability of the system abut
also reduces annual energy consumption by 10-15%. Study of Distributions
system is not part of our project.

J40252334
Page 31

Section 13
13.10 ECO 10: Energy Savings in Electric Motors

Electric motors installed to operate the pumping machinery represent a
significant opportunity for financial savings from energy consumption.
One motor is count more efficient than other when it uses less energy to
produce the same rated output. It is all due to construction using
high quality materials and advance manufacturing techniques and therefore,
results in less vibration, noise and heat.
Special emphasis should be laid at the time of selection of motors, below areas
offer potential savings.
1) Correctly sized motors
2) Energy efficiency of the motors
3) Regular maintenance
These regulatory measures offer the potential for long-term savings, although
are unlikely to result in wide scale energy reductions in the short term as they
are mostly subjected to future purchases, which may be made five to ten years
in the future.
1) In Pakistan the motors being used are following EFF3 class as a practice or
EFF2 class rarely these can be replaced with the EFF1 class motors (EFF1
constructed with better quality material)
2) Motors should be serviced periodically to ensure that:
Components are greased properly.
Operating at peak performance as recommended by the manufacturer.
Identify areas of wear or damage before the performance of the motor is
degraded
Electric motors failure relates to the fault in the stator wire, in this situation
rewinding usually repairs the motors but degrades their efficiency and
productivity.

J40252334
Page 32

Section 14
Conclusion
14.0 CONCLUSION
As water and electricity both are considered two critical resources for
sustainable economical growth and needed to be conserved, especially when
municipalities waste these resources unnecessarily at the same time when
several are deprived of. Energy audit can provide a viable advantage on
operating expenses and enhance the life of the equipment as well.
The overall energy consumption of a water supply system is a vital portion of
operating authorities' budgets. For water systems owned and operated by the
local municipalities, taxpayers bear the burden of unnecessary operating
expenses. To focus on real energy savings within the utility, it is important to
understand the pumping system network. Knowing the true system requirements
at peak and non-peak loads and understanding the benefits of efficiency for the
pump and motor play key roles in minimizing energy consumption.
If we ensure power factor is improved, motors and motor controls are replaced
with efficient ones or newly installed where required, more efficient and
properly sized pumps are procured, maintenance is carried out in more
efficient, holistic , proactive approach, monitoring is being done for pressure,
leakages, line losses, system deterioration and operators are given trainings for
correct operation methodology. The savings are confirmed and can be used by
municipalities to improve and expand their services.

J40252334
Page 33

Annexure 1
Summary of Site Data

J40252334
110
0
0
80
80
90
120
80
100
100
100
75
80
1.08
0.00
0.00
0.78
0.78
0.88
1.18
0.78
0.98
0.98
0.98
0.74
0.78
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
(180)
(132)
194
(354)
(227)
(213)
14
(165)
225
(147)
421
143
(45)
38.02
34.47
40.08
38.52
42.03
36.96
35.41
40.5
40.06
48.82
40.65
125
113
131
126
138
121
116
133
131
160
133
140
160
160
135
70
110
100
100
150
155
135
1.37
1.57
1.57
1.32
0.69
1.08
0.98
0.98
1.47
1.52
1.32
1.6
1.1
1.5
1.5
2
1.5
1.2
1.4
1.5
1.3
1.5
54
37
50
50
67
50
40
47
50
44
50
150
130
125
135
90
110
90
90
150
130
135
1.47
1.27
1.23
1.32
0.88
1.08
0.88
0.88
1.47
1.27
1.32
100
100
80
125
80
90
90
80
120
100
80
0.98
0.98
0.78
1.23
0.78
0.88
0.88
0.78
1.18
0.98
0.78
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
291
(142)
(168)
16
317
55
(31)
175
(95)
103
(35)
44 110 1.08
54 155 1.52
90
110
0.88
1.08
153
153
1.50
1.50
100
120
90
120
120
100
0
50
100
0.98
1.18
0.88
1.18
1.18
0.98
0.00
0.49
0.98
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
0.00
26.19
26.19
0.00
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
37.99 125 130 1.27 1.3

39.56 130 147 1.44 1.6
41.84
35.59
38.59
41.19
41.12
36.58
30.32
40.56
37.55
137
117
127
135
135
120
99
133
123
100
160
120
155
150
145
110
120
170
0.98
1.57
1.18
1.52
1.47
1.42
1.08
1.18
1.67
1.8
1
1.3
1.55
160
1.1
0.7
1.4
1.4
60
33
44
52
5358
37
23
47
47
120
130
100
155
140
115
75
110
150
1.18
1.27
0.98
1.52
1.37
1.13
0.74
1.08
1.47
(73)
(134)
248
44
7
1
184
208
(191)
114
(83)
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
50
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
50
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
550
450
450
400
400
450
400
500
500
500
450
390
500
400
500
500
500
450
450
400
500
400
400
450
450
400
400
400
450
400
500
450
500
500
450
450
450
390
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
128
120
128
120
128
120
120
128
128
128
120
120
128
128
128
120
120
128
128
120
120
120
120
120
128
128
128
120
120
128
120
128
128
128
120
120
120
128
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
200 Working
200 Working
210 Working
160 Working
158 Working
208 Working
160 Working
250 Working
250 Working
250 Working
208 Working
148 Working
248 Working
160 Not Working
250 Working
250 Working
250 Working
208 Working
208 Working
158 Working
250 Working
150 Working
158 Working
200 Working
208 Working
150 Not Working
158 Working
158 Working
200 Not Working
150 Working
250 Working
208 Working
258 Working
250 Working
200 Working
200 Working
208 Working
148 Working
Reason for non operational

pumps
1.37
0.78
0.00
0.88
0.88
1.08
1.32
0.98
1.27
1.47
1.27
0.88
1.23
Present
Condition
140
80
0
90
90
110
135
100
130
150
130
90
125
Strainer Length (Ft)
47
33
20
33
33
37
60
33
44
54
60
50
50
Blind Pipe Length (Ft)
1.4
1
0.6
1
1
1.1
1.8
1
1.3
1.6
1.8
1.5
1.5
Bore Depth (Ft)
Energy Cost Difference with a

Suitable pump
1.47
1.18
1.18
1.57
1.47
1.47
1.18
1.08
1.37
1.37
0.98
0.88
1.23
Housing Length (Ft)
Power input required for 150

Ft Head pump
150
120
120
160
150
150
120
110
140
140
100
90
125
Motor(HP)
Flow at 1.5 Bar after Water

Level
127
115
96
110
115
113
126
113
115
125
143
126
121
Manufacturer

Level 90
38.72
34.92
29.31
33.45
34.96
34.46
38.51
34.3
34.96
38.02
43.67
38.47
36.98
Flow at 1.8 -2 Bar after water

level 90djusted head 150 Ft
level 90 Ft and adjusted head
150 Ft 2
Flow at 1.5 Bar
23.28
23.28
23.28
24.17
24.17
21.49
21.49
28.65
23.28
Flow at 1.5 Bar 2
21.4
28.6
21.2
27.1
30.3
28.8
16.5
22.8
28.4
Head at Ground Level
21.7 23.28
23.7 23.28
Head at Ground Level 2
28.9
25.8
25.4
24
17.3
20.2
17.2
20.3
24.8
30.4
23.3
Flow Rate
Pump Under performing

Seems ok
Seems ok
Seems ok
Seems ok
Seems ok
Consuming excess power
Seems ok
Out of Order
Seems ok
Seems ok
Seems ok
Seems ok
Seems ok
Seems ok
Seems ok
Out of Order
Seems ok
Seems ok
Out of Order
Seems ok
Seems ok
Flow Rate 2
30.44
23.28
23.28
25.07
21.49
25.07
25.07
23.28
26.86
23.28
23.28
21.49
21.49
21.49
24.17
24.17
23.28
21.49
21.49
23.28
23.28
24.17
28.65
23.28
Actual head
23.5
19.1
24
22.6
22.8
23
21.3
16.9
27.9
22.3
18.1
24
20.8
Actual head 2
Apparent Remarks
2002 170 1.5

2002 130 1.5
130 1.5
- 140 1.5
- 120 1.5
2002 140 1.5
2001 140 1.5
2000 130 1.5
2004 150 1.5
130 1.5
- 130 1.5
- 120 1.5
120 1.5
1.5
2004 120 1.5
135 1.5
135 1.5
- 130 1.5
- 120 1.5
- 120 1.5
130 1.5
1995 130 1.5
2004 135 1.5
160 1.5
130 1.5
130 1.5
130 1.5
130 1.5
130 1.5
130 1.5
130 1.5
130 1.5
135 1.5
135 1.5
120 1.5
120 1.5
160 1.5
130 1.5
Re-bore
Design input (kW)
1998
2003
1992
1991
2003
1997
1986
2002
2002
1998
1999
2001
2003
1972
1980
2003
2003
1995
1996
1998
2002
1997
2003
2002
2008
2008
1995
1996
1995
1981
Power Input (kW)
1988
1990
2003
1982
1988
1991
1992
Capacity (Cusec)
Muzafar Pur
Muzafar Pur
Muzafar Pur
Kotli Behram
Kotli Behram
Model Town
Model Town
Model Town
Model Town
Model Town
Model Town
Model Town
Water Works
Water Works
Water Works
Muhammad Pura
Muhammad Pura
Muhammad Pura
Muhammad Pura
Shah Saidan
Shah Saidan
Shah Saidan
Shah Saidan
Kaream Pura
Kaream Pura
Kaream Pura
Kaream Pura
Kaream Pura
Ahmad Pura
Ahmad Pura
Ahmad Pura
Ahmad Pura
Ahmad Pura
Ahmad Pura
Hearan
Hearan
Hearan
Hearan
Head (Ft)
TMA Mohallah Cheela Pura

TMA Naya mayana Pura Near Kothi Mian Saeed
TMA Muzafar Pur (Grave Yard)
TMA Kotli behram
TMA Khagara Darbar (Kashmir Road)
TMA Model Town Tanky
TMA Model Town Muradia road
TMA Model town capital road
TMA Mubarik pura
TMA Noor pura Hakeem Khadim Ali road
TMA Nasir road
TMA Roadas Road Makki Masjid
TMA Pak pura
TMA Water works workshop
TMA Prem Nagar Abet road
TMA Poran Nagar Gali No 3
TMA Muhammad Pura Tanky
TMA Nishat park paris road
TMA Anwar Club
TMA Shah Saidan school
TMA Taj Pura
TMA Dara arayan
TMA Green Town Street
TMA Bara-e- Qilla Darbar pir muradia
TMA College Road
TMA Bano Bazar
TMA Raja road
TMA Maha Raja road
TMA Chowk Rang pura
TMA Islam pura near mosque
TMA Shah Khaki Wali
TMA Zafar Abad
TMA Amanat Pura
TMA Ahmad Pura Naya
TMA Rang pura New Pir Bashir
TMA Rangpura Saheen Pura
TMA Rangpora Ban Pura
TMA Rangpora Barian Lambian Pura
Installation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
Name of UC
Sr #
Area
Tubewell Name
ANNEXURE 1: SUMMARY OF SITE DATA
Motor Burnt
Bore Collapsed
Transformer Fault
Page 34

J40252334
153
153
153
153
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
29.38
30.22
36.37
46.24
41.62
31.31
39.06
38.98
39.01
42.68
31.44
47.31
96
99
119
152
137
103
128
128
128
140
103
155
150
115
135
150
150
85
160
105
130
115
85
160
1.47
1.13
1.32
1.47
1.47
0.83
1.57
1.03
1.27
1.13
0.83
1.57
1.2
0.6
1.2
1.8
2.1
0.8
1.4
1.4
1.4
2
0.6
1.3
40
20
40
60
70
27
47
47
47
67
20
44
110
0
110
160
170
0
150
100
120
140
70
130
1.08
0.00
1.08
1.57
1.67
0.00
1.47
0.98
1.18
1.37
0.69
1.27
90
0
90
150
160
0
140
85
95
125
60
110
0.88
0.00
0.88
1.47
1.57
0.00
1.37
0.83
0.93
1.23
0.59
1.08
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
51.38
44.2
35.85
33.57
34.39
35.49
28.74
34.43
28.31
30.85
169
145
118
110
113
116
94
113
93
101
150
130
120
156
100
150
60
130
135
135
1.47
1.27
1.18
1.53
0.98
1.47
0.59
1.27
1.32
1.32
1.7
1
0.8
1
1.1
1.5
0.4
1.1
0.5
0.6
57
33
27
33
37
50
13
37
17
20
160
80
110
80
70
150
0
110
0
0
1.57
0.78
1.08
0.78
0.69
1.47
0.00
1.08
0.00
0.00
130
0
80
0
0
130
0
70
0
0
1.27
0.00
0.78
0.00
0.00
1.27
0.00
0.69
0.00
0.00
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
153
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
34.9
32.85
34.94
31.9
38.57
114
108
115
105
127
100
100
135
60
150
0.98 1
0.98 0.8
1.32 1
0.59 1.6
1.47 2.1
33 0
27 0
33 0
54 70
70 185
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.69
1.81
0
0
0
50
170
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.49
1.67
153
102
153
102
153
1.50
1.00
1.50
1.00
1.50
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
0.00
0.00
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
0.00
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
26.19
0.00
26.19
17.46
26.19
17.46
26.19
(294)
45
28
548
118
31
83
118
12
(40)
(49)
410
279
237
412
61
435
41
(26)
(57)
69
(22)
464
(193)
(336)
(137)
128
288
(100)
354
193
40
40
40
50
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
50
50
50
50
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
50
40
30
40
40
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
Meco
KSB
KSB
KSB
KSB
500
450
500
400
500
450
500
500
500
550
500
390
450
400
400
450
400
550
600
500
550
450
450
400
550
400
500
400
400
400
400
450
400
128
120
120
120
120
128
128
120
120
120
120
120
128
128
128
128
120
128
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
128
120
120
120
128
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
128
128
128
128
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
250
210
258
160
252
208
250
258
250
300
258
148
208
150
150
158
208
300
350
250
300
208
208
158
308
158
250
158
150
158
158
208
158
Reason for non operational

pumps
0.69
1.47
1.45
1.86
Present
Condition
70
150
148
190
Strainer Length (Ft)
1.08
1.57
1.57
1.86
Blind Pipe Length (Ft)
110
160
160
190
Bore Depth (Ft)
33
64
60
80
Housing Length (Ft)
1.47 1
1.47 1.9
1.45 1.8
1.67 2.4
Motor(HP)

Level
150
150
148
170
Manufacturer

Level 90
113
145
139
162
Energy Cost Difference with a

Suitable pump
Flow at 1.5 Bar
Flow at 1.5 Bar 2
34.35
44.15
42.51
49.29
Power input required for 150

Ft Head pump
Head at Ground Level
Head at Ground Level 2

level 90djusted head 150 Ft
level 90 Ft and adjusted head
150 Ft 2
Flow Rate
Flow Rate 2
Seems ok
Seems ok
Seems ok
Seems ok
Out of Order
Out of Order
Seems ok
Seems ok
Seems ok
Seems ok
Seems ok
Seems ok
Seems ok
Seems ok
Out of Order
Seems ok
Out of Order
Seems ok
Seems ok
Out of Order
Actual head
Apparent Remarks
Design input (kW)
Power Input (kW)
Capacity (Cusec)
Re-bore
1998
130 1.5 21.8 23.28
2003
160 1.5 26.9 28.65
1980 2005 140 1.5 26.3 25.07
2003
200 1.5 37.9 35.81
1996
1.5
1985
1.5
2005
130 1.5 28 23.28
2004
120 1.5 20.7 21.49
2002
130 1.5 24.9 23.28
2003
162 1.5 28 29.01
1998
135 1.5 26.4 24.17
1991
130 1.5 14.5 23.28
2003
130 1.5 27.2 23.28
2003
135 1.5 24.7 24.17
1997
130 1.5 27 23.28
1995
140 1.5 23.8 25.07
1997
130 1.5 21.3 23.28
2004
170 1.5 32.5 30.44
2009
170 1.5
2003
170 1.5 36.2 30.44
2005
162 1.5 25.2 29.01
1998
130 1.5 20.7 23.28
2001
120 1.5 26.4 21.49
1993
120 1.5 18.7 21.49
2004
120 1.5 25.9 21.49
1982
140 1.5 17.8 25.07
2003
140 1.5 19.9 25.07
1993
120 1.5 18.6 21.49
1993
130 1.5 21.6 23.28
1986
130 1.5
1988
130 1.5 19.6 23.28
2004
200 1 22.3 23.88
1993
135 1.5 22 24.17
120 1 14.1 14.33
135 1.5 31.1 24.17
135 1.5
25.14
Actual head 2
Hearan
Neaka Pura
Neaka Pura
Haji Pura
Neaka Pura
Neaka Pura
Neaka Pura
Neaka Pura
Neaka Pura
Neaka Pura
Habib Pura
Habib Pura
Habib Pura
Habib Pura
Habib Pura
Habib Pura
Habib Pura
Amam Sahib
Amam Sahib
Amam Sahib
Amam Sahib
Shahab pura
Shahab pura
Shahab pura
Shahab pura
Haji pura
Haji pura
Haji pura
Haji pura
Haji pura
Fatheh Gharh
Fatheh Gharh
Fatheh Gharh
Kotli Loharin
Kotli Loharin
Doburji
Head (Ft)
TMA Rangpora Awanan Pura

TMA Neqa pora Kocha Shaikan
TMA Neqa pora shah deena
TMA Haji Pura near Kothi school
TMA Shujan Abad Chungi
TMA Shujan Abad Qabrastan
TMA Islaam Abad
TMA Haider Park
TMA Tiba Kakey Zaian Qabrastan
TMA Kashmiri Mohallah
TMA Babey Bairey
TMA Babey Bairey mohallah Khamaran
TMA Babey Bairey Alshamas street
TMA Habib pura Aman Abad
TMA Habib pura Chugain
TMA Amam Sahib Number 2
TMA Chah gondlan
TMA Shawala Park no 1
TMA Shawala Park no 2
TMA Saraie Bahabrian No 1
TMA Saraie Bahabrian near Ahmadia school
TMA Shahab Pura Tanky
TMA Shahab Pura near Darbar
TMA Shah Monga Wali
TMA Factory Area
TMA Haji pura Bin No 1
TMA Haji pura Mai sabran
TMA Kacha Shahab road Marian wala
TMA Ghos pura tanky
TMA Amam Sahib median wala
TMA Fatheh Garh graveyard
TMA Fatheh Garh omer town
TMA Fatheh Garh agency chowk
TMA Kotli Loharan East
TMA Kotli Loharan West
TMA Gulshan Iqbal Park
Installation
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
Annexure 1
Summary of Site Data
Name of UC
Sr #
Area
Tubewell Name

Working
Working
Working
Working
Not Working
Bore Collapsed
Not Working Transformer Fault
Working
Working
Working
Working
Working
Working
Working
Working
Working
Working
Working
Working
Not Working
MCU Burnt
Working
Working
Working
Working
Working
Working
Working
Working
Working
Working
Not Working
Shaft Broken
Working
Working
Working
Working
Working
Not Working Cable & Transformer
Page 35

Annexure 2
Site Data TMA Pump (An Example)
ANNEXURE 2: SITE DATA TMA PUMP (AN EXAMPLE)
PUMP SERIAL No.

Pump Nr.
21-8-10-8495
1- TMA
Report No.
Site Name
PUMP TYPE
IMPELLER DIA mm
Chelapura
Deepwell Turbine Pump
Pump Data
Pump Make
Pump Type & Stages
Pump Serial Nr.
Capacity Q
Bowl Head H bowl
Pump Head H
ESK Losses H vesk
Stage eff.
Drive rating
Nom. power Pump
Speed nom.
NPSH r
Length of Column
Specific Gravity
Specified Units
KSB
B10D/7
Standard Units
cuces
ft
ft
m
%
hp
hp
rpm
ft
80 ft
1
1.5
170.00
92.0
0.00
80.0
40.0
36.18
1480
153.0
51.83
28.0
0.00
80.0
29.9
27.00
1480
0
24.39
TEST RESULTS
FLOWMETER
INLET DIA
mm
mm
200
200
OUTLET DIA
mm
SHAFT DIA
MEASURED SPEED
mm
r.p.m.
3
m /hr
MEASURED FLOW
Discharge Pressure
Discharge Head (p1)
Datum Head (z1)
Tot. Dis. Head (h1)
ESK Losses
Point 1
Vel. Head loss (v2/2g) m

TOT. DYN. HEAD (H) m
Point 2
SIEMENS
LPK 12930568
08731838
40 hp
1470 rpm
59.3 A
91.0 %
PF @ F.L.
0.84
Overall Eff
72.8 %
Point 3
Point 4
Static Water Level

Pumping Water Level
Upper Bearing Temp
Lower Bearing Temp
Windng Temperature
Water Temperature
Ft
Ft
C
C
C
C
Avl
Func
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Point 5
Pump Output
Head
200
0.2 m
Daily Volume
30
0.03 m
1470
1470
1470
1470
100.0
120.0
150
175.0
200.0
2.000
20.42
23.78
44.20
1.800
18.38
23.78
42.16
1.400
14.29
23.78
38.07
0.800
8.17
23.78
31.95
0.400
4.08
23.78
27.86
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.051
0.074
0.116
0.157
0.206
Flow Rate
Head
Pump Efficiency
Motor Efficiency
Power Cosumed
Unit Cost
3
Cost per M
44.50
42.48
38.43
32.35
28.31
Annual Cost
44.0
44.0
45.0
45.0
46.0
VOLTAGE
POWER FACTOR
MOTOR INPUT
MOTOR EFF
V
cos
385
0.84
23.00
91
386
0.84
23.50
91
385
0.84
23.5
91
385
0.84
24
91
Hours
Existing
Design
Required
1.47
1.5
126
75.2
91
22.96
170
80
91
29.68
1.5
150
80
91
26.19
kW
%
MOTOR OUTPUT
kW
20.93
20.93
21.39
21.39
21.84
T HR U ST B R G. LOSS
S.B. HOUSING LOSS
kW
kW
0.260
0.290
0.246
0.280
0.230
0.270
0.200
0.260
0.154
0.242
NET PUMP INPUT
kW
20.38
20.40
20.89
20.93
21.44
STAGE EFF
UNIT EFF.
Q cusec
at r.p.m.
Head ft
at r.p.m.
kW on Water at r.p.m.
%
%
1470
1470
1470
59.46
52.69
68.04
60.36
75.18
66.81
73.68
65.61
71.92
64.26
0.98
145.95
20.93
1.18
139.32
20.93
1.47
126.06
21.39
1.72
106.11
21.39
1.96
92.87
21.84
28.07
28.08
28.69
28.69
29.30
1.00
182.00
63.00
32.83
1.20
170.00
70.00
33.12
1.50
170.00
78.00
37.15
1.75
147.00
76.00
38.47
2.00
126.00
75.00
38.18
Units
Cusec
Ft
%
%
kW
Rs
14
14
14
2.14
2.72
2.40
1,525
1,933
1,706
Rs.1,000
-408
-180
Rs.1,000
Exp. Energy Saving*

385
0.84
23.00
91
1.47
Cusec
126.0635 Ft
3
M
1950
3
711750 M
13
Annual Volume
AVERAGE AMPS
hp on media
SG =
1
DESIGN PARAMETERS
Flow Rate
Cusec
Head
Ft
Efficiency
%
Power Input
HP
65
78
30
30
42
27
Sluice Valve
Non Return Valve
Pressure Guage
Motor Control Unit
0.2 m
0.2 m
1470
bars
m
m
m
m
m /h
m
m
m
%
kW
kW
rpm
m
m
Motor Data
Motor
Motor No.
Rating
Speed @ F.L.
Full Load Current
Motor EFF @ F.L.
1-TMA-Sialkot/2010
Rs.
*This energy Saving is based on the same volume of water
78.00
REMARKS:
Wrongly designed pump. No need to install the pumps with 170 Ft head.
Pump is not working as per design. It seems that 1 or 2 impellers are free in the bowl.
Bowl Assembly to be refurbished for the 150 Ft head.
Recommendations
New pump with 150 Ft Head and 110 Ft Column pipe to be installed
Non return and Sluice Valve to be replaced
No need to change the motor.
TEST INFORMATION
TESTED BY:-
WITNESSED BY:-
DATE
DATE

J40252334
APPROVED BY:-
DATE
Page 36

Annexure 2
Performance Curves
Pump Nr.
1- TMA
Site Name
Chelapura
Type & Size: Deepwell Turbine Pump
Rated Specs:
Head:
170.00 ft
Capacity:
1.5 cuces
Speed:
1480 rpm
Driver Output:
40 hp
Works Nr.
Impeller dia
Liquid:
Temp.:
Sp. Gravity:
Viscosity:
21-8-10-8495
0
mm
WATER
27
C
1
0.00
cps
Head (ft)
260
240
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Discharge ~ Head
Duty Point
Manufacturer Data
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
95
Efficiency (%)
85
75
65
55
45
35
Pump Input (hp)
45
35
25
15
Discharge (cusec)

J40252334
Page 37

Pump Nr.
Site Name
Type & Size:
Rated Specs:
Head:
Capacity:
Speed:
Driver Output:
Annexure 2
1- TMA
Chelapura
170.00
1.5
1480
40
W/O No.:
Impeller dia
Liquid:
Temp.:
Sp. Gravity:
Viscosity:
ft
cuces
rpm
hp
21-8-10-8495
mm
0
WATER
27
1
0.00
cps
1.47
Cusec
Energy Efficiency Analysis
Pump Output
Daily Volume
Annual Volume
Flow Rate
Head
Pump Efficiency
Motor Efficiency
Power Cosumed
Unit Cost
3
Cost per M
Annual Cost
Exp. Energy Saving
13
Hours
Existing
Design
1.47
1.5
126
75%
91%
23.0
14
2.14
1,525
1950 M
3
711750 M
170
80%
91%
29.7
14
2.72
1,933
Required
1.5
150
80%
91%
26.2
14
2.40
1,706
Units
Cusec
Ft
%
%
kW
Rs
Rs.
Rs.1,000
-408
-180
Rs.1,000
Pump is not suitable for the required site conditions and will not perform without refurbishment with the system.

J40252334
Page 38

Annexure 3
Site Data PHED Pump (An Example)
ANNEXURE 3: SITE DATA PHED PUMP (AN EXAMPLE)
PUMP SERIAL No.

Pump Nr.
11-0326
1- PHED
Site Name
PUMP TYPE
IMPELLER DIA mm
Islamia Park
Pump Data
Pump Make
Pump Type & Stages
Pump Serial Nr.
Capacity Q
Bowl Head H bowl
Pump Head H
ESK Losses H vesk
Stage eff.
Drive rating
Nom. power Pump
Speed nom.
NPSH r
Length of Column
Specific Gravity
Specified Units
Flow Pak
10 FWC/7 Stages
1.5
200.00
125.0
0.00
78.0
50.0
43.65
1480
13.45
80
1
Report No.
cuces
ft
ft
m
%
hp
hp
rpm
ft
ft
153.0
60.98
38.1
0.00
78.0
37.3
32.58
1480
4.1006
24.39
TEST RESULTS
FLOWMETER
INLET DIA
mm
mm
200
200
OUTLET DIA
mm
SHAFT DIA
MEASURED SPEED
mm
r.p.m.
3
m /hr
MEASURED FLOW
Discharge Pressure
Discharge Head (p1)
Datum Head (z1)
Tot. Dis. Head (h1)
ESK Losses
Standard Units
Point 1

PF @ F.L.
Point 3
Static Water Level

Pumping Water Level
Upper Bearing Temp
Lower Bearing Temp
Windng Temperature
Water Temperature
Ft
Ft
C
C
C
C
Avl
Func
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
71 %
Point 4
Point 5
Pump Output
Head
200
0.2 m
Daily Volume
30
0.03 m
1470
1470
1470
1470
70.0
80.0
120
165.0
200.0
3.000
30.63
22.87
53.50
2.600
26.55
22.87
49.41
2.500
25.53
22.87
48.39
1.400
14.29
22.87
37.16
0.700
7.15
22.87
30.01
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.025
0.033
0.074
0.140
0.206
Flow Rate
Head
Pump Efficiency
Motor Efficiency
Power Cosumed
Unit Cost
3
Cost per M
53.76
49.69
48.71
37.54
30.46
Annual Cost
51.0
52.0
53.0
53.0
54.0
VOLTAGE
POWER FACTOR
MOTOR INPUT
MOTOR EFF
V
cos
kW
%
360
0.84
25.4
91
360
0.84
26
91
360
0.84
26.2
91
360
0.84
26.5
91
360
0.84
27
91
MOTOR OUTPUT
kW
23.11
23.66
23.84
24.12
24.57
S.B. HOUSING LOSS
kW
kW
0.260
0.290
0.246
0.280
0.230
0.270
0.200
0.260
0.154
0.242
NET PUMP INPUT
kW
22.56
23.13
23.34
23.66
24.17
STAGE EFF
UNIT EFF.
Q cusec
at r.p.m.
Head ft
at r.p.m.
%
%
1470
1470
1470
45.43
40.35
46.80
41.64
68.20
60.76
71.32
63.66
68.64
61.45
0.69
176.35
23.11
0.78
162.98
23.66
1.18
159.76
23.84
1.62
123.14
24.12
1.96
99.92
24.57
31.00
31.74
31.98
32.35
32.96
0.90
231.00
65.00
36.35
1.10
210.00
71.00
36.97
1.50
189.00
77.00
41.84
1.70
175.00
78.00
43.35
2.00
126.00
74.00
38.70
1.18
Cusec
159.7647 Ft
3
M
1560
3
M
569400
13
Hours
Existing
Design
Required
1.18
1.5
160
68.2
91
25.66
200
80
91
34.92
1.5
150
80
91
26.19
Annual Volume
AVERAGE AMPS
Units
Cusec
Ft
%
%
kW
Rs
14
14
14
2.99
3.20
2.40
1,705
1,819
1,364
Rs.1,000
-114
340
Rs.1,000
Exp. Energy Saving*
hp on media
SG =
1
DESIGN PARAMETERS
Flow Rate
Cusec
Head
Ft
Efficiency
%
Power Input
HP
65
75
32
54
41
25
Sluice Valve
Non Return Valve
Pressure Guage
Motor Control Unit
0.85
Overall Eff
Point 2
SIEMENS
LPK 12930568
12830574
50 hp
1475 rpm
71.7 A
91.0 %
0.2 m
0.2 m
1470
bars
m
m
m
m
m /h
m
m
m
%
kW
kW
rpm
m
m
Motor Data
Motor
Motor No.
Rating
Speed @ F.L.
Full Load Current
Motor EFF @ F.L.
1-PHED-SIALKOT/2010
Rs.
75.00
7.00
REMARKS:
33
30
27
25
18
Wrongly designed pump. No need to install the pumps with 200 Ft head. Extra head and discharge will damage the Strainer and cause sand blowing
Pump is inefficient against the required site parameters and consuming extra energy.
Installed pump is inherrently inefficient at design operating conditions.
Recommendations
New pump with 150 Ft Head and 110 Ft Column pipe to be installed
Although the required motor size is 40 HP but available 50HP motor can be used to reduce the replacement cost.
No need to change the motor.
TEST INFORMATION
TESTED BY:-
WITNESSED BY:-
DATE
DATE

J40252334
APPROVED BY:-
DATE
Page 39

Annexure 3
Performance Curves
Pump Nr.
1- PHED
Site Name
Islamia Park
Rated Specs:
Head:
200.00 ft
Capacity:
1.5 cuces
Speed:
1480 rpm
Driver Output:
50 hp
Works Nr.
Impeller dia
Liquid:
Temp.:
Sp. Gravity:
Viscosity:
11-0326
0
mm
WATER
25
C
1
0.00
cps
Head (ft)
260
240
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Discharge ~ Head
Duty Point
Manufacturer Data
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
95
Efficiency (%)
85
75
65
55
45
35
Pump Input (hp)
45
35
25
15
Discharge (cusec)

J40252334
Page 40

Pump Nr.
Site Name
Type & Size:
Rated Specs:
Head:
Capacity:
Speed:
Driver Output:
Annexure 3
1- PHED
Islamia Park
200.00
1.5
1480
50
W/O No.:
Impeller dia
Liquid:
Temp.:
Sp. Gravity:
Viscosity:
ft
cuces
rpm
hp
11-0326
mm
0
WATER
25
1
0.00
cps
1.18
Cusec
Pump Output
Daily Volume
Annual Volume
Flow Rate
Head
Pump Efficiency
Motor Efficiency
Power Cosumed
Unit Cost
3
Cost per M
Annual Cost
Exp. Energy Saving
13
Hours
Existing
Design
1.18
1.5
160
68%
91%
25.7
14
2.99
1,705
1560 M
3
569400 M
200
80%
91%
34.9
14
3.20
1,819
Required
1.5
150
80%
91%
26.2
14
2.40
1,364
Units
Cusec
Ft
%
%
kW
Rs
Rs.
Rs.1,000
-114
340
Rs.1,000
Pump is not suitable for the required site conditions and is consuming Rs, 340,000 per annum extra than a standard available
pump in the market.

J40252334
Page 41

Annexure 4
Site Data Cantt Pump (An Example)
ANNEXURE 4: SITE DATA CANTT PUMP (AN EXAMPLE)
PUMP SERIAL No.

Pump Nr.
Report No.
Site Name
PUMP TYPE
IMPELLER DIA mm
Fire Brigade Cant

Pump Data
Pump Make
Pump Type & Stages
Pump Serial Nr.
Capacity Q
Bowl Head H bowl
Pump Head H
ESK Losses H vesk
Stage eff.
Drive rating
Nom. power Pump
Speed nom.
NPSH r
Length of Column
Specific Gravity
Specified Units
KSB
B12B/4
Standard Units
cuces
ft
ft
m
%
hp
hp
rpm
ft
80 ft
1
2.0
150.00
70.0
0.00
80.0
50.0
42.56
1480
204.0
45.73
21.3
0.00
80.0
37.3
31.76
1480
0
24.39
TEST RESULTS
FLOWMETER
INLET DIA
mm
mm
150
200
OUTLET DIA
mm
SHAFT DIA
MEASURED SPEED
mm
r.p.m.
3
m /hr
MEASURED FLOW
Discharge Pressure
Discharge Head (p1)
Datum Head (z1)
Tot. Dis. Head (h1)
ESK Losses
1 -Cantt-SIALKOT/2010
Point 1
bars
m
m
m
m

m /h
m
m
m
%
kW
kW
rpm
m
m
Motor Data
Motor
Motor No.
Rating
Speed @ F.L.
Full Load Current
Motor EFF @ F.L.
SIEMENS
LPK
7006845
50 hp
1470 rpm
69 A
91.0 %
PF @ F.L.
0.88
Overall Eff
72.8 %
Static Water Level

Pumping Water Level
Upper Bearing Temp
Lower Bearing Temp
Windng Temperature
Water Temperature
Point 2
Point 3
Point 4
Point 5
Pump Output
Head
200
0.2 m
Daily Volume
30
0.03 m
1470
1470
1470
1470
50.0
85.0
130
150.0
170.0
2.000
20.42
24.39
44.81
1.800
18.38
24.39
42.77
1.600
16.34
24.39
40.73
1.100
11.23
24.39
35.62
0.500
5.11
24.39
29.50
1.27
134.7
8
Hours
Existing
Design
Annual Volume
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.24
0.013
0.037
0.087
0.116
0.148
Flow Rate
Head
Pump Efficiency
Motor Efficiency
Power Cosumed
Unit Cost
3
Cost per M
45.07
43.05
41.06
35.98
29.89
Annual Cost
43.0
42.0
43.0
43.0
46.0
VOLTAGE
POWER FACTOR
MOTOR INPUT
MOTOR EFF
V
cos
kW
%
409
0.89
26.90
91
409
0.89
26.50
91
409
0.89
26.90
91
409
0.89
26.90
91
409
0.89
27.50
91
MOTOR OUTPUT
kW
24.48
24.12
24.48
24.48
25.03
S.B. HOUSING LOSS
kW
kW
0.260
0.290
0.246
0.280
0.230
0.270
0.200
0.260
0.154
0.242
NET PUMP INPUT
kW
23.93
23.59
23.98
24.02
24.63
STAGE EFF
UNIT EFF.
Q cusec
at r.p.m.
Head ft
at r.p.m.
%
%
1470
1470
1470
25.65
22.81
42.25
37.61
60.62
54.04
61.20
54.64
56.18
50.32
0.49
147.82
24.48
0.83
141.20
24.12
1.27
134.67
24.48
1.47
118.02
24.48
1.67
98.03
25.03
32.83
32.35
32.84
32.84
33.57
1.20
165.00
70.00
32.15
1.50
162.00
75.00
36.82
2.00
150.00
82.00
41.58
2.50
120.00
80.00
42.62
3.00
100.00
74.00
46.07
1.27
134.7
60.6
91
26.35
150
80
91
34.92
1.08
150
0.8
Cusec
Ft
3
1040 M
3
379600 M
Required
Units
2
150
80
91
34.92
Cusec
Ft
%
%
kW
Rs
14
14
14
2.84
2.40
2.40
Rs.
1,077
910
910
Rs.1,000
168
168
Rs.1,000
Exp. Energy Saving*
REMARKS:
1.1
Highly In efficient because of wear and tear.
New Bowl Assembly to be installed
Ft
Ft
C
C
C
C
Func
Yes
No
No
No
System Pressure
AVERAGE AMPS
hp on media
SG =
1
DESIGN PARAMETERS
Flow Rate
Cusec
Head
Ft
Efficiency
%
Power Input
HP
Avl
Yes
Yes
No
No
Sluice Valve
Non Return Valve
Pressure Guage
Motor Control Unit
0.15 m
0.2 m
1470
55
80
30
30
38
27
80.00
5.00
0.666667
Recommendations
New Bowl Assembly required.
TEST INFORMATION

J40252334
TESTED BY:-
WITNESSED BY:-
DATE
DATE
APPROVED BY:-
DATE
Page 42

Annexure 4
Performance Curves
Pump Nr.
1
Site Name
Fire Brigade Cant
Rated Specs:
Head:
150.00 ft
Capacity:
2 cuces
Speed:
1480 rpm
Driver Output:
50 hp
Works Nr.
Impeller dia
Liquid:
Temp.:
Sp. Gravity:
Viscosity:
0
0
mm
WATER
27
C
1
0.00
cps
Head (ft)
260
240
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Discharge ~ Head
Duty Point
Manufacturer Data
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.3
2.5
2.7
2.9
3.1
3.3
3.5
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.3
2.5
2.7
2.9
3.1
3.3
3.5
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.3
2.5
2.7
2.9
3.1
3.3
3.5
95
Efficiency (%)
85
75
65
55
45
35
Pump Input (hp)
45
35
25
15
Discharge (cusec)

J40252334
Page 43

Pump Nr.
Site Name
Type & Size:
Rated Specs:
Head:
Capacity:
Speed:
Driver Output:
Annexure 4
1
Fire Brigade Cant
150.00
2
1480
50
W/O No.:
Impeller dia
Liquid:
Temp.:
Sp. Gravity:
Viscosity:
ft
cuces
rpm
hp
mm
0
WATER
27
1
cps
0.00
Pump Output
Daily Volume
Annual Volume
Flow Rate
Head
Pump Efficiency
Motor Efficiency
Power Cosumed
Unit Cost
3
Cost per M
Annual Cost
1.27 Cusec
8
Hours
Existing
Design
1.27
1.5
135
61%
91%
26.4
14
2.84
1,078
150
80%
91%
26.19
14
2.40
910
Exp. Energy Saving
168
1040 M
3
379600 M
Required
1.5
150
80%
91%
26.2
14
2.40
910
Units
Cusec
Ft
%
%
kW
Rs
Rs.
Rs.1,000
168
Rs.1,000
Highly degraded due to wear and tear. Bowl Assembly to be replaced.

J40252334
Page 44

Annexure 5
Site Data Disposal Pump (An Example)
ANNEXURE 5: SITE DATA DISPOSAL PUMP (AN EXAMPLE)
PUMP SERIAL No.

Pump Nr.
21-06-10-4912
1
Site Name
PUMP TYPE
IMPELLER DIA mm
Model Town Disposal Capital Road

Horizontal Non Clogging Pump
Pump Data
Pump Make
Pump Type & Stages
Pump Serial Nr.
Capacity Q
Bowl Head H bowl
Pump Head H
ESK Losses H vesk
Stage eff.
Drive rating
Nom. power Pump
Speed nom.
NPSH r
Length of Column
Specific Gravity
Specified Units
KSB
KWP 150-315
3.0
30.00
15.0
0.00
71.0
30.0
14.39
975
13.45
80
1
Report No.
Standard Units
cuces
ft
ft
m
%
hp
hp
rpm
ft
ft
306.0
9.15
4.6
0.00
71.0
22.4
10.74
975
4.1006
24.39
TEST RESULTS
FLOWMETER
INLET DIA
mm
mm
200
200
OUTLET DIA
mm
SHAFT DIA
MEASURED SPEED
mm
r.p.m.
3
m /hr
MEASURED FLOW
Discharge Pressure
Discharge Head (p1)
Datum Head (z1)
Tot. Dis. Head (h1)
ESK Losses
Point 1

Point 2
SIEMENS
LPK 12930568
053840702
30 hp
975 rpm
43.5 A
91.0 %
PF @ F.L.
0.81
Overall Eff
64.6 %
Point 3
Point 4
Static Water Level

Pumping Water Level
Pump Bearing Temp
Motor Bearing Temp
Windng Temperature
Water Temperature
Pump Output
Head
200
0.2 m
Daily Volume
30
0.03 m
970
970
970
970
235.0
278
300.0
310.0
0.400
4.08
6.00
10.08
0.400
4.08
5.00
9.08
0.400
4.08
4.00
8.08
0.400
4.08
3.00
7.08
0.400
4.08
2.00
6.08
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.206
0.284
0.397
0.462
0.494
Flow Rate
Head
Pump Efficiency
Motor Efficiency
Power Cosumed
Unit Cost
3
Cost per M
11.29
10.37
9.48
8.55
7.58
Annual Cost
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
VOLTAGE
POWER FACTOR
MOTOR INPUT
MOTOR EFF
V
cos
kW
%
420
0.72
16.5
91
420
0.72
16.5
91
420
0.72
16.5
91
420
0.72
16.5
91
420
0.72
16.5
91
MOTOR OUTPUT
kW
15.02
15.02
15.02
15.02
15.02
S.B. HOUSING LOSS
kW
kW
0.260
0.290
0.246
0.280
0.230
0.270
0.200
0.260
0.154
0.242
NET PUMP INPUT
kW
14.47
14.49
14.52
14.56
14.62
STAGE EFF
UNIT EFF.
Q cusec
at r.p.m.
Head ft
at r.p.m.
%
%
970
970
970
42.51
37.27
45.80
40.22
49.45
43.51
47.98
42.32
43.76
38.77
1.96
37.03
15.02
2.30
34.01
15.02
2.73
31.10
15.02
2.94
28.03
15.02
3.04
24.86
15.02
20.14
20.14
20.14
20.14
20.14
1.50
40.00
68.00
10.03
2.00
37.00
72.00
11.68
2.50
35.00
72.00
13.81
3.10
29.00
70.00
14.60
3.50
25.00
64.00
15.54
23.14815
16.66667
25
Func
Yes
Yes
No
No
2.94
Cusec
28.03231 Ft
3
M
3000
3
1095000 M
Hours
Existing
Design
Required
2.94
28
48.0
91
16.00
30
70
91
11.97
3
30
70
91
11.97
Units
Cusec
Ft
%
%
kW
Rs
14
14
14
0.75
0.55
0.55
Rs.
818
600
600
Rs.1,000
218
218
Rs.1,000
Exp. Energy Saving*
27.77778
Avl
Yes
Yes
No
No
10
Annual Volume
200.0
REMARKS:
30.55556
Highly degraded due to wear and tear
Refurbishment of Pump required
Ft
Ft
C
C
C
C
Point 5
AVERAGE AMPS
hp on media
SG =
1
DESIGN PARAMETERS
Flow Rate
Cusec
Head
Ft
Efficiency
%
Power Input
HP
10
15
35
42
40
27
Sluice Valve
Non Return Valve
Pressure Guage
Motor Control Unit
0.2 m
0.2 m
970
bars
m
m
m
m
m /h
m
m
m
%
kW
kW
rpm
m
m
Motor Data
Motor
Motor No.
Rating
Speed @ F.L.
Full Load Current
Motor EFF @ F.L.
1-Disposal-SIALKOT/2010
19.68
6.00
Recommendations
Refurbishment of Pump
No need to change the motor
TEST INFORMATION
TESTED BY:-
WITNESSED BY:-
DATE
DATE

J40252334
APPROVED BY:-
DATE
Page 45

Annexure 5
Performance Curves
Pump Nr.
1
Site Name
Type & Size: Horizontal Non Clogging Pump
Rated Specs:
Head:
30.00 ft
Capacity:
3 cuces
Speed:
975 rpm
Driver Output:
30 hp
Works Nr.
Impeller dia
Liquid:
Temp.:
Sp. Gravity:
Viscosity:
21-06-10-4912
0
mm
Waste Water
27
C
1
0.00
cps
Head (ft)
40
20
Discharge ~ Head
Duty Point
Manufacturer Data
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.3
2.5
2.7
2.9
3.1
3.3
3.5
3.7
3.9
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.3
2.5
2.7
2.9
3.1
3.3
3.5
3.7
3.9
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.3
2.5
2.7
2.9
3.1
3.3
3.5
3.7
3.9
95
Efficiency (%)
85
75
65
55
45
35
Pump Input (hp)
25
15
Discharge (cusec)

J40252334
Page 46

Pump Nr.
Site Name
Type & Size:
Rated Specs:
Head:
Capacity:
Speed:
Driver Output:
Annexure 5
1
Horizontal Non Clogging Pump
30.00
3
975
30
ft
cuces
rpm
hp
W/O No.:
Impeller dia
Liquid:
Temp.:
Sp. Gravity:
Viscosity:
21-06-10-4912
mm
0
WATER
27
1
0.00
cps
2.94
Cusec
M
3
M
Pump Output
Daily Volume
Annual Volume
Flow Rate
Head
Pump Efficiency
Motor Efficiency
Power Cosumed
Unit Cost
3
Cost per M
Annual Cost
10
Hours
Existing
Design
2.94
28
48%
91%
16.0
14
0.75
818
30
70%
91%
12.0
14
0.55
600
3000
1095000
Required
3
30
70%
91%
12.0
14
0.55
600
218
218
Exp. Energy Saving
Units
Cusec
Ft
kw
kW
Rs
Rs.
Rs.1,000
Rs.1,000
Highly Degraded due to wear and tear and required to be refurbished

J40252334
Page 47

Annexure 6
Site Data Pump Curves
ANNEXURE 6: SITE DATA PUMP CURVES

J40252334
Page 48


J40252334
Annexure 6
Page 49


J40252334
Annexure 6
Page 50

Annexure 6
Site Data Pump Curves FlowPak Pumps 1.5 Cusec
Site Data Pump Curves FlowPak Pumps 1.5 Cusec

J40252334
Page 51
Clerkenwell House, 67 Clerkenwell Road,

London, EC1R 5BL, United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7611 1100
Fax: +44 (0) 20 7368 6960
E-mail: email@ghkint.com
Internet: http://www.ghkint.com
House No 5, Officer Block,

Noor Pur Road, Muslim Town,
Faisalabad, Pakistan
Tel. & Fax: +92 (0) 41 881 7644-45
E-mail: email@ghkpak.com
Internet: http://www.ghkpak.com

33 Energy Audit Report On Tubewells and Sewage Pumping Stations in Sialkot

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

33 Energy Audit Report On Tubewells and Sewage Pumping Stations in Sialkot

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

TA 7321 PAK

Punjab Cities Improvement

ENERGY AUDIT REPORT

GHK Consulting Ltd

Energy Audit Report of Tubewells,

Number of Pumps Operated by Cantt and TMA ............................................................ 10

GHK Consulting Limited

Energy Audit Report of Tubewells,

Acronyms & Abbreviations

ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATION

Asian Development Bank

GHK Consulting Ltd.

Tehsil Municipal Administration

Public Health Engineering Department

Cantonment Board Sialkot Best

Best Efficiency Point

Daily Operating Hours

Energy Conservation Opportunities

Cubic Feet Per Second

GHK Consulting Limited

Energy Audit Report of Tubewells,

Figure E-1: Selection Parameters

Energy Audit Report of Tubewells,

Total Number of Tubewells Inspected

Findings & Suggestions During Survey

Graphical Representation of Potential Savings

Energy Audit Report of Tubewells,

Summary of Recommendations on Findings and Potential Saving

Minimize the reactive power charges

10 Appropriate size of motors

Expected Saving Distribution

Conclusion of Executive Summary

Adopting suggested measures as a routine or developing them as a culture gives life to

GHK Consulting Limited

Energy Audit Report of Tubewells,

GHK Consulting Limited

Energy Audit Report of Tubewells,

GHK Consulting Limited

Energy Audit Report of Tubewells,

Map of Sialkot Showing Location of Tubewells

GHK Consulting Limited

Energy Audit Report of Tubewells,

Study of pumps design and their operational characteristics.

Comprehensive Study Elements

GHK Consulting Limited

Energy Audit Report of Tubewells,

Flow Rate with ultrasonic flow meter.

GHK Consulting Limited

Energy Audit Report of Tubewells,

GHK Consulting Limited

Energy Audit Report of Tubewells,

Number of Pumps Operated by Cantt and TMA

The pumps shown against the PHED are the pumps

Tube wells Operating Schedule

1st Operating Time

2nd Operating Time

3rd Operating Time

GHK Consulting Limited

12:00 Noon to 08:00 PM

Energy Audit Report of Tubewells,

NON OPERATIONAL TUBEWELLS

Reason of Non Operational Tube wells

Not yet commissioned