Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Paper S1-2
Institute of Telecommunications
Aveiro, Portugal
I. INTRODUCTION
One of the dominant aspects of todays telecommunications
networks is the limitations in terms of bandwidth imposed by
the access segment. In many countries such situation
undermines the sustainable development of this sector and
() =
x
x
x
Paper S1-2
6# ( 2 6)
(5)
6$ ( 2 6)
where 6$ () is defined as deviation at time t of $ ()
relative to $():
6$ () = $ ( 2 6) 2 $()
6# ( 2 6) = 6$ ( 2 6).
(1)
Where:
() is the adoption rate of the technology in the
market over time t;
is the initial adoption rate at t=0;
is the adoption rate at saturation when ;
(4)
[1, )]
6# ( 2 6)
#( 2 6) #( 2 6)
6# ( 2 6) = 6$ ( 2 6).
.
6$ ( 2 6) $( 2 6)
$( 2 6)
and
#( 2 6) ==
(6)
% #8 ()
% # ()
The ratio
6# ( 2 6)
#( 2 6)
6$ ( 2 6)
$( 2 6)
(7)
$( 2 6)
$() =
x
(2)
6# ()
= ;& () = ;&
6$ ()
(8)
# () =
# ( 2 6) +[$- ( 2 6) 2 1]. ;& (). #( 2 6)
(10)
Paper S1-2
Example:
For a specific example of a market with 3 operators, 10.000
users, initial relative qualities and market shares given by
Table 1, the market share evolution over a period of 36 time
units is given by Figure 2
Table 1. Relation between operator, quality of service and
initial market share
Operator
Initial Relative
Qualities
A
B
C
0,937
1,057
1,007
(11)
{# (0)},
[1, 3)]
70%
7%
23%
$=
KL
QL
TUL
'DEW ()
%LXM
BCDED (F)GHI9J NPI9J NSI9J
NV
'>?W
Ti
KM
QM
TUM
%XM >?@ ()A
ghI9^ a
TiM
_`Z\
_`bcd'
f
aYbcd' I9^
aeI9^ a
YZ\ I9^
_`Z\M
_`bcd'M
fM
(12)
Where:
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Paper S1-2
90.000
Operator B
100.000
Operator C
150.000
25
25
50
650
500
600
75%
60%
50%
600
400
500
25%
40%
50%
(c)
(d)
Figure 4. One practical example of market shares, financial
results and quality function
(a)
IV. A GAME THEORY APPROACH
As mentioned before, in the above approach each operator
was allowed to change its market strategy every 12 time units.
In the results presented in previous section these changes were
done resorting to reasonable and plausible decisions. This
leaves one question unanswered: what is the best (optimum, if
possible) decision that each operator should take when he is
allowed to change its strategy?
(b)
Paper S1-2
noplq(**r)m
8
) (13)
3su (5 , u )
|5 = 0
3u
(14)
(15)
Paper S1-2
VI. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.
The work reported in this paper has had the following
support:
i.
HP Innovations on Education Grant.
ii.
Project Redes de Nova Gerao-FTTh (New
Generation Networks - FTTh, led by CABELTE,
Cabos Elctricos e Telefnicos, S.A, and supported by
Sistema de Incentivos Investigao e
Desenvolvimento Tecnolgico (SI&DT) do Quadro de
Referncia Estratgica Nacional, Portuguese
Government and European Union funding.
iii.
Facilities provided by the University of Aveiro (P)
and by Institute of Telecommunications (P).
This support is deeply appreciated.
Paper S1-2
VII.
REFERENCES
[1] Borgar T. Olsen, Alcibiade Zaganiaris, Kjell Stordahl, L.
Aa. Ims, D. Myhre, T. Averli, M. Tahkokorpi, I. Welling,
M. Drieskens, J. Kraushaar, J. Mononen, M. Lahteenoja,
S. Markatos, M. De Bortoli, U. Ferrero, M. Ravera, S.
Balzaretti, F. Fleuren, N. Gieschen, M. De Oliveira
Duarte, and E. de Castro, Technoeconomic Evaluation of
Narrowband and Broadband Access Network Alternatives
and Evolution Scenario Assessment, IEEE JSAC, vol. 14,
no. 8, 1996.
[2] L. A. Ims, Ed., Broadband Access Networks
Introduction Strategies and Techno-Economic Evaluation,
Telecommunications Technology and ApplicationsSeries,
Chapman & Hall, 1998.
[3] K. Stordahl and L. Rand, Long Term Forecasts for
Broadband Demand, Telektronikk, vol. 2, no. 2/3, 1999;
http://www.telenor.com/telektronikk/,pp 4344.
[4] D. Varoutas et al., On the Economics of 3G Mobile
Virtual Network Operators, Wireless Pers. Commun.,
Springer, vol. 36, no. 2, Jan. 2006, pp. 12942.
[5] N. J. Frigo, P. P. Iannone, and K. C. Reichmann, A View
of Fiber to the Home Economics IEEE Commun. Mag.,
vol. 42, Aug 2004, pp. S16S23.
[6] B. T. Olsen et al, "Technoeconomic Evaluation of the
major Telecommunication Investment Options for
European Players " IEEE Network, vol. 20, no. 4, July
2006.
[7] S. Verbrugge et al., Methodology and input availability
parameters for calculating OpEx and CapEx costs for
realistic network scenarios, Journal of Optical
Networking, Vol. 5, Issue 6, pp. 509-520, 2006.
[8] T. Monath et al., Techno-Economic aspects of FixedMobile Convergence (FMC) opportunities based on the
MUSE project, in Proc. Broadband Europe 2007,
Antwerp, Belgium, December 3-6, 2007.
[9] M. Kantor K. Wajda B. Lannoo K. Casier S. Verbrugge
M. Pickavet L. Wosinska J. Chen A. Mitcsenkov,
"General framework for techno-economic analysis of next
generation access networks", 12th International
Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON
2010), Munich, Germany, 27 June - 01 July 2010, pp.
Mo.C4.2.
[10] The ECOSYS Project, http://optcomm.di.uoa.gr/ecosys/,
Deliverable 16.
[11] Dimitris Katsianis, Attila Gyrke, Rozlia Konkoly,
Dimitris Varoutas and Thomas Sphicopoulos, A Game
Theory modeling approach for 3G Operators
NETNOMICS:Economic Research and Electronic
Networking, Volume 8, Numbers 1-2 / October, 2007 pp
71-90 online Sep 2008, ISSN 1385-9587.
[12] Rasmusen, Eric (2006), Games and Information: An
Introduction to Game Theory (4th ed.), Wiley-Blackwell.
[13] McKelvey, R. D. (1997). An interactive extensive form
game program. http://econweb. tamu.edu/gambit/.
California Institute of Technology.