Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
eserver pgina inicial bad articles 2004 66: marx & theory recovering the state: interview with saskia sassen
small text normal text large text
buscar
Sees
entrada
sobre articles
Bad Subjects
authors
books
contact us
editorials
links
notcias
reviews
bibliography
mapa do site
navegao
About Us
Bad Articles
Bad Authors
Bad Editorials
Bad Books
Bad Links
Bad News
Bad Reviews
Pgina Inicial
About Us
Bad Articles
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
71: Prisonvision
70: Open Issue
69: Slaveries
67: Family Nation
66: Marx & Theory
Introduction: All that is
Solid Melts into ...Barbarous
Empire-ialism
C uba Libre: C apitalism,
C ommunism, and the Worker
Voices from the
C ollective: Response to
Aldama's C uba Libre
Voices from the
C ollective: C uba Libre Redux
Music C an Rock, Just Not
the World
Recovering the State:
Interview with Saskia
Sassen
C iudades en riesgo:
Entrevista a Saskia Sassen
*****
http://bad.eserver.org/issues/2004/66/Lara_english.html
1/5
24/06/2015
ML: More and more people call themselves "citizens of the world" and
identify with universal values. Does national citizenship make sense
as the state loses power in a globalized world?
SS: The conditions for a transnational citizenship are solidifying. Although
some groups are genuinely transnational, like Internet communities,
world social forums or international volunteer movements, transnational
citizenship is just a component of a much more complex experience:
traditional citizenship. Formal rights with regards to the state continue to
be the crucial element.
The enormous number of people converging from all over the world
produce a sort of "transnationalism in situ": they meet on the street for
the first time, in corporate workplaces, in the neighborhoods of global
cities, or by encountering other immigrants in highly professional jobs. For
example, we can venture to see a relation between the situation of
immigrants and the emergence of political practices of an informal nature.
Immigrants, even illegal ones, often become new political subjects.
Bad Reviews
notcias
82: M(other)hood
ML: You state the necessity to "urbanize the social sciences." To what
does this refer?
SS: To understand social processes, one needs to research and focus on
what happens in cities. Firstly, metropolises are strategic places in the
global economy for several reasons:
a) they are bridges between the nation-state and the world;
b) they are locations for implementing measures to reduce the
influence of large foreign corporations. These measures include
ensuring housing for the impoverished middle class, establishing
taxes for the "new rich" and corporations, promoting civic
responsibility, and guaranteeing worker-oriented labor standards.
Mais...
relacionados
Recursos locais
"Like a Disembodied Shade":
C olonization and Internment as
the American Way of Life
Oil Addiction? No kidding
Microsoft Jungle: Bytes and
Beef
C alifornia Violences
Racak, Mon Amour
Letter from South Africa
Kosovo and Neo-Nationalism
Globalization is tangible in the way that struggles are recurrent from one
city to another; for example, the demands of migrants, gay and lesbian
communities. This is what makes it necessary to research the practice of
citizenship and the role of civil society. The loss of governmental influence
gives way to new forms of power at local or neighborhood levels. Cities
are the places building that new political geography.
Links Externos
Haider in C uckooland
The New Anti-C apitalism
2/5
24/06/2015
3/5
24/06/2015
the United States can show, where we have 50 million under the poverty
line five times the population of the island; 40 million workers without
medical insurance; and much higher child mortality rates in poor
neighborhoods than in Cuba.
It's true that each country has a sort of a necessity to create crisis
atmospheres to justify its government's actions. The Cuban state has an
obsession with power mixed with strong social policy in which many still
believe. In the United States, the measures limiting civil freedoms and
allowing large corporations to exploit resources, as in Iraq, are connected
to the interests of a small group of politicians from the Republican Party
and their associated companies. In this sense, the differences between
these countries are scandalous.
ML: What risk do cities take regarding international terrorism?
SS: Cities are now the favorite target. War inflamed hatred against the
United States, like a boomerang effect. The youth of many suicidal
terrorists is one proof that Iraq's defeat didn't demoralize extremists;
they go on recruiting followers and intensify their attacks. The most
recent attacks in Baghdad or Indonesia demonstrate that innocents are
the ones who continue dying.
The Annual Report on Global Terrorism (2002), from the US State
Department, notes that between 1993 and 2000, 94 percent of the
injuries and 61 percent of deaths from terrorist attacks took place in
cities. Several reasons explain this: these are centers of power, focus
media attention, and are sufficiently complex to hide terrorist movements.
The city has replaced the kidnapped airplane: the new target is the
media show, not the enemy in person.
Cities like New York, London and Paris are targets for terrorism. Since last
year, we can add Kabul, Riyadh, Casablanca, BaliOthers such as Athens,
Istanbul, Rome, Berlin, and Jerusalem belong to other global nets but are
potential victims too.
Every attack broadcast by the media induces its repetition, a fact that
creates a vicious circle. Neither politicians nor military leaders will take the
biggest risks urban populations will. While US policy provokes rage and
hate from other cultures, cities will be targets for terrorist attacks. The US
government is working very hard to make a world that is less safe for
everyone.
Insecurity will also destabilize underdeveloped societies. Many poor
countries suffered shocking economic policies, which desolated traditional
national sectors. Now they will also have to pay the costs of an American
policy against terrorism causing anger and desperation, an ideal breeding
ground for violence. It would be naive to think that the rich and relatively
safe countries in the North will escape the consequences of urban
attacks. No matter how far away we may be, we cannot ignore the
poverty, wars and diseases suffered by the South.
http://bad.eserver.org/issues/2004/66/Lara_english.html
4/5