Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ia
ib
ic
Vsa
R1
C
Vdc
Sb
Vsb
V
Sc
Vsc
[i]abc
R1
V
vdc
-
[v]abc
idc
R
+
[vs]abc
V vdc
dvdc
+ idc =
dt
R1
(1)
d[i]abc
+ Ri = [v]abc
dt
(2)
ia + i b + i c = 0
(3)
Applying the transformation method from three-phase system (abc) to rotating frame (dq):
xd
xq
cos w1 t
2
cos(w1 t 120 )
=
3
cos(w1 t + 120 )
T
xa
sin w1 t
sin(w1 t 120 ) xb
xc
sin(w1 t + 120 )
(4)
(5)
2
iq = [ia sin w1 t + ib sin(w1 t 120 ) + ic sin(w1 t + 120 )]
3
(6)
id =
vd =
2
[va cos w1 t + vb cos(w1 t 120 ) + vc cos(w1 t + 120 )]
3
2
vq = [va sin w1 t + vb sin(w1 t 120 ) + vc sin(w1 t + 120 )]
3
(7)
(8)
2 dia
dib
dic
did
= [
cos w1 t +
cos(w1 t 120 ) +
cos(w1 t + 120 )]
dt
3 dt
dt
dt
(9)
2
w1 [ia sin w1 t + ib sin(w1 t 120 ) + ic sin(w1 t + 120 )]
3
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(sL + R + jw1 L) I = V
(16)
1
I
G(s) =
= sL + R + jw L
1
V
(17)
Id
Vd
sL+R
wL
wL
Iq
+
sL+R
Vq
PI
-
Decoupling
dq
V+
abc
Switching
control
I
VSI
Vs
dq
abc
dq
abc
,
V
G1(s)
G(s)
Gdc (s) =
1
I
0 = sL + R
V
(18)
I = G(s) V
(19)
V = G1 (s)V 0
(20)
combining these two equations and equation 18 and knowing, also, that G dc (s) = G1 (s)G(s)
the transfer function G1 (s) is defined as:
G1 (s) = 1 + j
w1 L
sL + R
(21)
2) Feedback method
Iref +
-
PI
dq
V+
+
abc
Switching
control
I
VSI
Vs
dq
abc
Decoupling
dq
abc
,
V
G(s)
G2(s)
Figure 7: Feedback decoupling
Similarly as in the previous method we have to define the transfer function
G2 (s) such that the equation 18 is valid.
From figure 7 can be seen that:
V = G2 (s) I + V 0
(22)
(23)
Gdc (s) =
G(s)
I
0 = 1 G(s)G (s)
2
V
(24)
Combining this equation with equations 18 and 17 it can be seen that decoupling transfer function G2 (s) in the case of feedback method is given with:
G2 (s) = jw1 L
(25)
Simulation Results
The VSI shown in figure 1 has been simulated using both Simulink and
PLECS. Simulation results for steady state are presented in figure 8 (feedforward method) and in figure 10 (feedback method). Also, simulation results
for the step change in reference current are given in figures 9 and 11 for both
methods. The circuit parameters are L=2mH, C =100F, f =50Hz, V=400V,
R1 = 1, Idref = 10A, Iqref = 0A (after 0.01 sec Idref = 15A).
Feedforward decoupling (id,iq)
20
15
id,iq
10
10
0.005
0.01
0.015
time [sec]
0.02
0.025
0.03
20
15
id,iq
10
10
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
time[sec]
0.03
0.035
0.04
0.045
0.05
12
10
id,iq
0.005
0.01
0.015
time [sec]
0.02
0.025
0.03
15
id,iq
10
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
time[sec]
0.03
0.035
0.04
0.045
0.05
Figure 11: d and q current components using feedback decoupling method with
step change in reference current
Comments
From equation 21 it can be concluded that when R 0 the value of the
inductance is not necessary to be known and that could be an advantage of
the feedforward method, which is not the case with the feedback method where
we have to know value of inductance (equation 25). On the other hand, under
the same conditions (when R 0) we have an oscillatory behavior in the feedforward method due to the integration (we have the integrator part 1/s), and
we do not have oscillations in the feedback method. It can be seen, as well, in
figures 8 and 10.
10
References
1. S. Buso, L. Malesani, P. Mattavelli, Comparison of Current Control Techniques for Active Filter Applications, IEEE Transaction on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 45, No.5, October 1998., pp.722-729
2. J. Choi, S. Sul, Fast current controller in three-phase ac/dc boost converter
using d-q axis crosscoupling, IEEE Transaction on Power Electronics, Vol. 13,
pp. 179-185, Jan. 1998.
3. Y.Sato, T. Ishiuka, K. Nezu, T.Kataoka, A New Control Strategy for
Voltage-Type PWM Rectifiers to Realise Zero Steady-State Control Error in
Input Current, IEEE Transaction on Industry Applications, Vol. 34, No.3, pp.
480-486, 1998.
4. D. N. Zmood, D. G. Holmes, Stationary Frame Current Regulation of PWM
Inverters with Zero Steady State Error, PESC 99., pp. 1185 -1190, Vol.2
5. M.P. Kazmierkowski, L. Malesani, Current control techniques for threephase voltage-source PWM converters: a survey, Industrial Electronics, IEEE
Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 45, No. 5, Oct.1998., pp. 691 -703
6. M.P. Kazmierkowski, M. Cichowlas, Comparison of current control techniques for PWM rectifiers , Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 4, pp. 1259 -1263
7. J.R. Espinoza, G. Joos, L. Moran, Decoupled control of the active and reactive power in three-phase PWM rectifiers based on non-linear control strategies
PESC 99., pp. 131 -136, Vol.1
8. J. Jung, K. Nam, A dynamic decoupling control scheme for high-speed operation of induction motors, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol.
46, No. 1 , Feb. 1999., pp. 100 -110
9. D. N. Zmood, D. G. Holmes,G.H. Bode,Frequency-domain analysis of threephase linear current regulators, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications,
Vol. 37, No. 2, March-April 2001., pp. 601 -610
11