Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
A
61
71
17
0
0
16
18 MVA
80 MVA
Max Rating
11
5
5
10
33
28
A power transfer from A to D has been proposed and this example will attempt to demonstrate
how the maximum possible reliable transfer is determined.
This illustration displays flows that would be obtained from a seasonal base case power flow
model, and represent the branches of the Identified A-D Path.
Red quantities are maximum allowable flows based on most limiting equipment.
A,B,C & D represent areas or points in the system that contain generation and/or distributed load.
Note for this example:
Total Transfer Capability (TTC) for each segment is considered equal to the maximum flow rating.
Existing Transmission Commitments (ETC) for each segment is equal to the flow shown here
resulting from the base case power flow simulation.
+ 40MW Generation
A
TDF
78
94
ITC
0.425
160 61
233
0.425
17
0
0
16
0.575
172
78 61
40
22 MVA
0.100
620
80
11
5
5
10
51
50
0.450
160
0.550
158
+ 40MW Load
This figure illustrates how branch flows in the transfer path would change for an arbitrary but
realistic interchange of 40MW.
The flows shown here are during N-0 or normal system conditions with all elements in service.
A linear analysis is then used to calculate the maximum possible transfer:
1. Calculate the Transfer Distribution Factor (TDF) for each branch. TDF represents what
fraction of the total transfer appears on a given segment.
2. Calculate the Incremental Transfer Capability (ITC) for each branch. ITC represents the
maximum total transfer each branch could accommodate over and above base flows.
3. The branch with the lowest ITC will be the limiting element for this transfer.
4. Calculate the ATC for that limiting element: ATC = TTC ETC**
5. The ATC of this limiting element is considered the ATC for this A-D path during normal
system conditions.
Segment C-D is the limiting element in transfer path A-D with an ITC = 158MVA, therefore the ATC
for path A-D is TTC ETC for this element.
ATC = 115 28 = 87MVA during N-0 Conditions.
Notice that simply calculating TTC- ETC for each branch and using the minimum would not yield
the same results.
**(TRM and CBM neglected and considered zero in this example)
FCDF
132
132 61
71
1.00
173
0
16
0
16
42 MVA
-30 MVA
80
0.30
167
80
10
11
10
10
-0.32
50
0.31
11
5
-0.68
173 132
1.00
40
160 132
FCITC
28
1.00
FCTDF
22
0.30
317
78
0.70
93
+ 40MW
Load
Prior to Transfer
With Transfer
+ 40MW
Generation
A
Most Limiting Element for this Outage
173
132
17
17
0
1.00
38
1.00
77 MVA
60 MVA
0.69
80
0.43
80
47
10
75
0.30
11
5
11
10
51
0.60
90
-0.31
26
0.43
249
+ 40MW
Load
Prior to Transfer
With Transfer
+ 40MW
Generation
A
68
0
17
0.53
175
0
16
0
16
C
10
11
0.50
18
-0.56
5
10
42
11
-0.50
89
83
0.53
206
0.39
17
0
62
63
0.53
120
D
+ 40MW
Load
Prior to Transfer
38
0.50
194
With Transfer
+ 40MW
Generation
A
69
17
17
0
0.60
152
59 MVA
42 MVA
0.73
11
89
80
80
0.43
11
5
0
16
0.24
0
16
-0.27
93
79
0.43
254
62
61
1.00
102
1.00
53
+ 40MW
Load
Prior to Transfer
With Transfer
+ 40MW
Generation
A
51
17
0
-0.68
16
0
16
0.32
63
110
0.75
120
-0.36
17
80
0.30
363
13 MVA
-1 MVA
80
0.30
80
263
5
10
10
5
102
61
1.00
43
1.00
D
Most Limiting Element for this Outage
+ 40MW
Load
Prior to Transfer
With Transfer
1.00
1.00
92 = 44+(1.0)*48.0
44
0
16
0
16
48
FCDF
FCTDF
18
C
29
22
D
Worst Outage Conditions
Using the Worst Outage results shows that A-C would have 92 MVA of flow for worst outage conditions. With Total
Transfer Capacity of 160, these determine ATC = 160 92 = 68 MVA. There is 68MVA of Capacity left on this line for
further commercial activity.
Since the FCTDF of this line is 1.00, means that 68/1.0 = 68MW of total transfer would be possible. If 68MW of total
transfer is occurring, branch A-B would be loaded to 160MVA while all other branches are less than maximum loaded.
Other branch loadings could also be predicted using the Distribution Factors calculated in the detailed ATC analysis.
Below are the results which agree well with power flow model.
+ 68 MW
Generation
A
160
0
16
34.8 MVA
80
10
11
5
33.6
84.5
D
+ 68 MW
Load