Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
REACTION
J. CORTEZ
1
UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES, PEDRO GIL ST., ERMITA, MANILA, METRO MANILA,
PHILIPPINES
DATE SUBMITTED: June 29, 2015
DATE PERFORMED: June 23, 2015
ABSTRACT
( )( T1 )+ln ( A )
ln ( k ) =
Ea
R
results of the experiment and the graphs that it has generated, it is confirmed that these
factors affect the kinetics of chemical processes.
INTRODUCTION
2 AB
METHODOLOGY
( 1 ) rate=
[B]
1 [ A ]
rate=
2 t
t
Seven solutions were prepared first by
class, these are:
1. 500mL 0.2 M KI
2. 500mL 0.2 M KCl
3. 500 mL 0.1M K2S2O8
4. 500 mL 0.1M K2SO4
A +B C+ D
( 2 ) rate=k [ A ] [B ]
Beaker A
( 3 ) ln ( k )=ln ( A )
Ea
RT
Ru
n
1
2
3
4
5
0.2
M
KI,
mL
10
5
2.5
5
5
0.2
M
KCl,
mL
0
5
7.5
5
5
5
5
5
2.5
0
5
5
5
5
5
Effects
of
Persulfate
and
Iodide
Concentrations on the Reaction Rate
Five solutions were prepared for this test.
Each beaker has different chemical ratio. It
was vital that all the beakers will be under
the same temperature. This was to ensure
that the temperature will not affect the
outcome of each beaker. It is essential
that the process was timed properly for
accurate computation of rate. Proper
timing was done once beaker A and B
were mixed and stopped when mixture
changed its color into blue.
Effect of Temperature on the Reaction
Rate
Run 2 of the preceding test were
duplicated for this analysis. One beaker
was put in a hot bath while another was
placed in an ice bath. This provided the
factor of stress on the chemical process of
both beakers. The hot and cold baths
guarantee
the
large
difference
in
temperature for both runs.
4
5
0.03M
0.04
M
0.04
M
0.04M
6.55 x107
472
8.45 x107
S2 O 8
I
( 5 ) rate=k
613
-4
ln(rate)
-13.5
-3.8 -3.6 -3.4 -3.2 -3
-14
f(x) = 1.37x - 9.53
R = 0.97
-14.5
-15
ln [S2O8 2-]
[S2O8
2]
0.02M
0.02M
0.02M
[I- ]
0.08
M
0.04
M
0.02
M
Tim
e (s)
590
Rate
(Ms-1)
6.78x10-7
120
1
215
0
3.33 x107
1.86 x107
-4.5
ln(rate)
-4
-3.5
-3
-13.5
-2.5-14 -2
-14.5
f(x) = 0.94x - 11.84
R = 1
-15
-15.5
-16
ln [I-]
Varying
Temperatur
e
Ru
n
1
Tem
p (K)
300
328
277
Rate
(Ms-1)
2.02
x10-6
7.27
x10-6
3.83x10
-7
Catalyzed
Run
301.
15
4.00
x10-5
k
(M-1s-1)
2.53
x10-3
9.09
x10-3
4.78
x10-4
0.05
0
-2 0
ln (k)
-4
-6
-8
-10
(1/T)
( 6 ) ln ( k ) =
Ea 1
+ln ( A )
R T
( )
which is comparable
y=mx +b
The Ea of the chemical process is 4.38x10 4
kJ/mol and the A=9.20x104 M-1s-1.
With the case of the catalyzed reaction,
the CuSO4 served as the enhancer for the
reaction. The beaker has displayed a
faster rate compared to the control
beaker. This happens due the ability of the
catalyst to hasten the reaction by lowering
the Ea of the chemical process (Skoog,
West, Holler, & Crouch, 2004). An
alternative pathway is provided for
components to react with a decreased E a.
Usually the catalyst forms an intermediate
in the reaction but is again regenerated in
a succeeding step (Chang, 2010).
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES