Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
*
* cyc0711@mail.tcu.edu.tw
136
orum o
m r
Num r
pp
P
W
L
-A A
C
G
Show-Fang Ho
C
P
Ching-Yuan Chang
A
The purposes of this study were: 1) to develop a program of creative teaching of
writing composition via pictures, and 2) to evaluate the students' writing ability
performance according to their writing composition via pictures in creative teaching.
The research instrument was "Inventory of Writing Composition via Pictures for
Lower Grade Students (revised version)". There were 16 2nd students (male11, female
5) and 7 teachers. All the students were administered the inventory two times (pre-test
and post-test). The collected data were analyzed by t-test (dependent). Additionally,
the teachers' observation meeting records, interviewing records, feedback list,
reflection notes were offered to compare the change of students' writing ability
performance. The creative teaching was administered eight times in this study. The
results were as the following: 1) Change picture presents the way, the schoolchild
responded that "trailing blank" simple, "the middle blank" the inference is difficult,
after "picture inspiration, independently creates" an interest, easily to unfold the
creativity. 2) The teachers' comments mutually were helpful to improve the problems
in writing. 3) The creative teaching of writing composition via pictures was presented
with multiple styles and helpful to develop the students' multiple wisdom. 4) After
administering the creative teaching with writing composition via pictures, all the
students had remarkable progress in "words were correct", "composition matching
pictures", "words were fluent", "words usage", "composition had creativity" except
"punctuations were correct" in the inventory.
Keywords: writing composition via pictures, creative teaching, writing
ability performance
137
2003
1993
2003
138
2003
1998
1988
139
8-9 Piaget
Bruner
Bandura
1996
140
Goodman Altwerger
1992
Heitman2005
1995
1
19901
2
3
141
1999
2003
2003
142
2006
2006
ERIC
Thesaurus
20022004
143
2004
2003
Margaret William2007
1
1
R-Reason it out
E-Enjoy learning
A-Apply to the
real world
T-Teacher model
144
M-Metacognition
I-Inquiry
N-New Knowledge
D-Differentiate
S-Systematic reflection
Margaret William2007
2004
145
146
1993
147
2007
1
2
3
()4
2003
2003
2003
Likert
2002
148
2001
2002
1
2
3
2000
149
125 15
150
11 5 16
151
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
152
120
160
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
160
153
2003
2003
154
Likert
.72p< .001
155
156
157
158
2002
1999
2001
1
1
159
1
2
3
4
5
6
160
2004
1996
2003
161
Margaret William2007
16
*p<.05
6.13
6.50
5.00
5.04
4.08
5.04
2.96
3.50
1.80
1.49
1.05
2.03
8.75
8.00
8.04
8.17
6.96
8.23
1.20
2.92
1.07
1.17
1.72
1.50
t
3.53*
1.68
7.61*
8.64*
8.66*
7.91*
4
1.
2.
3.
162
4.
5.
163
16
8
t
164
165
166
1990
1998
2004
20029825-26
1992
20026142-8
1993
1996
167
(2004)
200312657-64
2006
1995
1996
20029811-17
2003
200264129-35
2004
4129-50
2006
2004
1988
2003
2003
36755-62
2003
1999
2003
1999
168
200490
2003
3-27
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. (1981). Identifying the organization of writing process. In L.
W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive process in writing (pp.3-50).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Heitman, J. (2005). Picture this: Using picture books to teach writing skills. Library
Media Connection, 23(7), 36.
Margaret, C. P., & William, A. K. (2007). Great minds think differently sustaining a
system of thinking. Doctoral Forum--National Journal for Publishing and
Mentoring Doctoral Student Research. 4(1) (ERIC Document Reproduction
Service NO. ED494 511