Sie sind auf Seite 1von 34

135

*
* cyc0711@mail.tcu.edu.tw

136

orum o
m r

u tion l A ministr tion


Volum

Num r

pp

P
W
L

-A A
C
G

Show-Fang Ho

C
P

Ching-Yuan Chang

A
The purposes of this study were: 1) to develop a program of creative teaching of
writing composition via pictures, and 2) to evaluate the students' writing ability
performance according to their writing composition via pictures in creative teaching.
The research instrument was "Inventory of Writing Composition via Pictures for
Lower Grade Students (revised version)". There were 16 2nd students (male11, female
5) and 7 teachers. All the students were administered the inventory two times (pre-test
and post-test). The collected data were analyzed by t-test (dependent). Additionally,
the teachers' observation meeting records, interviewing records, feedback list,
reflection notes were offered to compare the change of students' writing ability
performance. The creative teaching was administered eight times in this study. The
results were as the following: 1) Change picture presents the way, the schoolchild
responded that "trailing blank" simple, "the middle blank" the inference is difficult,
after "picture inspiration, independently creates" an interest, easily to unfold the
creativity. 2) The teachers' comments mutually were helpful to improve the problems
in writing. 3) The creative teaching of writing composition via pictures was presented
with multiple styles and helpful to develop the students' multiple wisdom. 4) After
administering the creative teaching with writing composition via pictures, all the
students had remarkable progress in "words were correct", "composition matching
pictures", "words were fluent", "words usage", "composition had creativity" except
"punctuations were correct" in the inventory.
Keywords: writing composition via pictures, creative teaching, writing
ability performance

137

2003

1993

2003

138

2003

1998
1988

139

8-9 Piaget

Bruner

Bandura


1996

140

Goodman Altwerger

1992

Heitman2005

1995
1

19901


2
3

141

1999

2003

2003

142

2006
2006

ERIC
Thesaurus

Development and use of novel, original, or inventive teaching methods

20022004

143

2004

2003

Margaret William2007

1
1

G-Get up and move

R-Reason it out

E-Enjoy learning

A-Apply to the
real world

T-Teacher model

144

M-Metacognition


I-Inquiry

N-New Knowledge

D-Differentiate

S-Systematic reflection

Margaret William2007

2004

145

146

1993

147

2007
1
2
3
()4

2003

2003

2003

Likert

2002

148

2001

2002

1
2
3

2000

149

125 15

150

11 5 16

151

1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

1.

2.

3.
4.
5.

152

120


160

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

1.
2.
3.
4.


160

153

2003
2003

.76p < .001


.58p< .001

154

Likert

.87p < .001

.72p< .001

155

156

157

158

2002

1999
2001

1
1

159

1
2
3
4
5
6

160

2004

1996

2003

161

Margaret William2007

16

*p<.05

6.13
6.50
5.00
5.04
4.08
5.04

2.96
3.50
1.80
1.49
1.05
2.03

8.75
8.00
8.04
8.17
6.96
8.23

1.20
2.92
1.07
1.17
1.72
1.50

t
3.53*
1.68
7.61*
8.64*
8.66*
7.91*

4
1.

2.

3.

162

4.

5.

163

16
8
t

164

165

166

1990
1998
2004
20029825-26
1992

20026142-8
1993
1996

167

(2004)

200312657-64
2006

1995
1996
20029811-17
2003

200264129-35
2004
4129-50
2006

2004

1988
2003

2003
36755-62
2003

1999

2003
1999

168

200490
2003
3-27
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. (1981). Identifying the organization of writing process. In L.
W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive process in writing (pp.3-50).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Heitman, J. (2005). Picture this: Using picture books to teach writing skills. Library
Media Connection, 23(7), 36.
Margaret, C. P., & William, A. K. (2007). Great minds think differently sustaining a
system of thinking. Doctoral Forum--National Journal for Publishing and
Mentoring Doctoral Student Research. 4(1) (ERIC Document Reproduction
Service NO. ED494 511

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen