Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ANAers – There’s a whole lot happening – regardless of what part of the ‘community” you
consider….maritime patrol, helos, go-fasters, ships and, GOD BLESS THEM, Aviation Bos’n
Mates – somewhere in the mix of defense reviews and budget submissions, etc, you’ll find
them. Now is the time to read up, to truly find out what is happening – and where needed to
contact your leadership AND legislators and tell them what they need to do – what they need to
support – to keep Naval Aviation at the sharpest point of the spear – that force for victory and
peace.
Our informal survey about adding a web-based capability for membership renewals and
financial gift giving was overwhelmingly for adding that to our web site at
http://www.anahq.org/. We will get that done ASAP.
Another survey, done outside these pages, indicates that the frequwency of BULLHORNS is
about what membership wants. It also showed that the hyperlink feature that gives point and
click navigation from the INDEX listing is useful; we will continue that.
MEMBERSHIP, MEMBERSHIP!!!
Best regards and VR,
Dutch
Dutch
Rauch
Secretary/Treasurer
Association
of
Naval
Aviation,
Inc.
A
501(C)(3)
not-‐for-‐profit
organization
1446
Waggaman
Circle
Mclean,
VA
22101
svwindmills@erols.com
http://www.anahq.org/
PS – In response to many, please find that the font size has been increased – all for we more
mature folks ;-o))
INDEX
(hold
down
the
CTRL
key,
move
your
mouse
curser
over
the
title,
when
the
curser
turns
to
a
pointing
finger,
click
your
mouse
to
go
to
the
article.
Click
on
RETURN
TO
INDEX
to
get
back
here)
US Navy Reserve in Action - Haiti
DEFENSE REVIEWS and BUDGET ACTIONS
Navy closes BNAS runways
2010 Quadrennial Defense Review
USS Carl Vinson Departs Haiti
Fiscal Year 2011 Department of the Navy Budget Submission
Mayport To Get Nuclear Aircraft Carrier
Carrier Bush Returned To Navy
Navy Copter Unit Gets New Leader Commander
Indian Navy To Induct MiG-29K Fighter Jets
Lockheed Strengthening Fuselage In Navy’s F-35 Model
Gates Fires Head of F-35 Fighter Jet Program
Navy Seeks Boost To Shipbuilding Fund, No Money For F/A-18E/F Multi-Year
Navy Requests Nine Ships, 206 Aircraft in FY-11; New Command Ship, EFV Delayed
Proposed Defense Budget Paves Way For Carrier Base In Florida
F-35 Issues
U.K. Backs BAE Carrier Project
RETURN TO INDEX
The DOD FY2011 Budget Request is a 7MB file that can be found at
http://comptroller.defense.gov/budget.html
Transcripts for:
• the QDR and Missile defense review briefing can be found at
http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=4550
• FY2011 Budget Request briefing can be found at
http://www.defense.gov/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=4551
The presentation slides/etc are found at the hyperlink at the beginning of each
respective briefing.
The full 2011 Budget Submit is a 7MB file which I have and can send at your request.
RETURN
TO
INDEX
From atop the control tower, Brunswick Naval Air Station Air
Operations Officer David Ivezic points out all the runway lights
that will go dark tonight as the base shuts down its runways.
At 10 p.m. today, Brunswick Naval Air Station will hold a brief
ceremony to mark the end of Navy aviation at the base.
The silent display will signal the official end of more than a half century of military
airfield operations in Brunswick.
The closure of the base airport — which consists of twin 8,000-foot runways and a
control tower built in 2006, among other things — is another step in the incremental
shutdown of the 3,200-acre base property. By May 2011, the entire base is scheduled
to be closed as an active duty military installation.
“This is probably, up to this point, the most visible symbol of our closing”,Capt.
William Fitzgerald, commanding officer of Brunswick Naval Air Station, told The Times
Record on Thursday. “Even the squadrons coming and going, that was always
happening. Even recently, we still had some planes taking off and landing here. But
when you finally shut down the light and put the Xs on the runways, it’s a big
milestone. There will be no more planes.”
Cmdr. David Ivezic is the head of the base’s air operations department, and also a
pilot.
“I’ve been to the airports in Wiscasset and Bowdoinham, and I’ve talked to a lot of
pilots in the community. I’m getting the sense that, ‘Wow, this is going to be a big
loss’, Ivezic said. “This is going to leave a big hole in the aviation community.”
Ivezic said that while final decisions haven’t been made, the most junior member of
his air operations staff will likely turn the lights off for the last time, while the most
senior member of the crew will broadcast the airfield’s last transmission. Both jobs will
be performed from the top of the 130-foot-tall control tower, which overlooks the
runways from the western edge of the base property.
“It’s kind of a ceremonial thing,…; Ivezic said. “We’ll bring it up to the max lights —
get the place lit up like a big Christmas tree — and then shut them down.”
What will the last transmission sound like? Air Controlman 1st Class Keith Piccirello,
who was one of two sailors manning the control tower Wednesday morning, said that
will be determined by whoever is ultimately chosen to give the transmission.
“It’ll be up to him what he wants to say,…; said Piccirello. “(Maybe he will say,) ‘This
is the last transmission from Naval Air Station Brunswick.’ Then he’ll have to hand
over control of the air space to Portland.
Ivezic said the Federal Aviation Administration will maintain the Brunswick control
tower after the Navy ceases use of its aviation facilities, but said air traffic control
duties would be performed remotely using the equipment at Portland International
Jetport.
Fitzgerald said the process of shutting down the base airfield began more than 10
months ago.
“It will no longer be NAS Brunswick air space, and all that has to be accounted for,…;
he said. “Memorandums of agreement for different air space areas had to be canceled
out. ... It may seem easy at the end to just turn off the lights, but an awful lot of stuff
had to happen to get us there.”
With the airfield shut down, Ivezic’s crews will spend their time packing up aviation-
related equipment and shipping it to other military bases or federal organizations for
use. Some of the equipment, he said, will stay in Brunswick to be used by civilians
hoping to take over airport operations in the coming months.
In the case of a permanent closure, Ivezic said, the numbers and markings on the
runways are generally gouged out of the asphalt. However, anticipating a transfer of
the airfield property to civilian redevelopers, he said the Navy will place temporary
yellow X marks instead. The X marks are about 10-feet-by-60-feet, and are light
material that will be weighed down by cinder blocks or other heavy objects.
“We are not going to damage the runways or their numbers in any way”, he said.
But that will be after as many as nine months of darkness at the airfield and decades
of very different uses.
“In 1943, the base was initially established, and from training Canadian and British
pilots for World War II, to all the things this base has meant to the Cold War and
protecting the Northeast Corridor, Fitzgerald said, “it’s quite a legacy this base has
had.”
RETURN TO INDEX
RETURN TO INDEX
USS CARL VINSON, At Sea (NNS) -- The Nimitz-class aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) departed the waters
near Port-au-Prince, Haiti Feb. 1 after rendering humanitarian assistance to the victims of a massive 7.0 earthquake
that struck the Caribbean nation Jan. 12.
Arriving on station less than 72 hours after the quake, Carl Vinson immediately rendered assistance. Over two weeks,
Vinson and its embarked 19 helicopters flew more than 2,200 sorties, delivering more than 166 tons of food, 89,000
gallons of water and 38,700 lbs. of medical supplies to earthquake victims.
Additionally, Vinson's helicopters conducted 476 medical evacuations (MEDEVACs) and the ship's doctors and
corpsmen treated 60 patients in its medical ward.
"I think our Navy team did some great work here for the people of Haiti," Carl Vinson Carrier Strike Group
Commander Rear. Adm. Ted Branch said.
Carl Vinson's primary role in the humanitarian mission was as a first responder, providing critical airlift and command
and control capabilities as the flagship of Task Force 41, the Navy's sea base supporting Joint Task Force (JTF) Haiti.
Prior to departure, the Vinson left behind much of its airlift capability, transferring 10 helicopters to other units in JTF-
Haiti. Additionally, the improvement of the relief distribution effort on the ground, in partnership with the Haiti
government, the United Nations, the international community, and supporting organizations have reduced the need of
the ship's first responder role.
With the departure of Carl Vinson, Rear Adm. Dave Thomas assumes command of Task Force 41 (CTF 41), the U.S.
Navy's sea-based element supporting JTF-Haiti. Thomas is embarked aboard the task force's flagship, the amphibious
assault ship USS Bataan (LHD 5).
The Bataan Amphibious Ready Group, with elements of the 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU), are specially
configured for sustained humanitarian assistance missions, including air and sealift capabilities, medical and
engineering support and water purification.
While in support of Operation Unified Response, Vinson Sailors saw firsthand the results of their work in support of the
Haitian people.
"Every one of my Sailors wanted to go ashore to help," said Carl Vinson Commanding Officer Capt. Bruce Lindsey. "It
was inspiring to see such an outpouring of volunteerism. America should be very proud of the Sailors that they have
serving--their country and others."
Vinson Sailors said they were proud of their efforts in support of the numerous humanitarian aid and disaster relief
missions in which they were involved.
"I had a chance to talk to some of the Haitians," said Machinist's Mate Fireman Evangelina Abarca. "It hurt a lot to
know that many of them had lost family members, but I've never been more proud to say that I am a member of the
United States Navy."
USS Carl Vinson will now continue on its original mission, performing Theater Security Cooperation (TSC)
engagements with key Latin American partners while transiting to its homeport of San Diego.
RETURN TO INDEX
Fiscal
Year
2011
Department
of
the
Navy
Budget
Submission
February 1, 2010
A product of... Navy Office of Information www.navy.mil
RETURN TO INDEX
Justin Fishel
- FOXNews.com
- February 01, 2010
A senior manager is being removed and Lockheed Martin penalized for missing targets on a
new generation of fighter jets currently in production, the secretary of defense said Monday.
A senior manager in charge of procuring the next generation of military fighter jets known as F-
35 Joint Strike Fighter has been fired and the Department of Defense has been instructed to
withhold money that would pay bonuses to the lead contractor, Defense Secretary Robert Gates
announced Monday.
In a briefing at the Pentagon on the 2011 defense budget, Gates said inefficiencies and budget
overruns within the costly fighter program forced him to take action.
Gates said Lockheed Martin, the defense contractor responsible for producing the F-35, is in
agreement with his plan to withhold bonuses, calling it a burden "the taxpayer should not have
to bear."
In 2009 a Defense Department review concluded the Joint Strike Fighter program had
significant cost overruns and its production dates were far over schedule.
Gates did not announce a replacement to head up the Joint Strike Fighter program, but he said
the new position will be elevated to that of a three-star officer.
Gates has a reputation for firing his senior staff, and he was quick to point that out.
"One cannot absorb the additional costs that -- that we have in this program and the -- and the
delays, without people being held accountable. And I think if -- if I've set one tone here at the
Department of Defense, it is that, when things go wrong, people will be held accountable."
In 2008 Gates fired Air Force Secretary Michael Wynn and forced out the Air Force Chief of
Staff, Michael T. Moseley in wake of the "loose nukes" scandal earlier that year.
In 2009 he removed Gen. David McKiernan from his position as the commanding general in
Afghanistan after it became clear that the Taliban had reversed the momentum of the war. Brig.
Gen. David Heinz, now the former Program executive officer for the F-35, has become the
secretary's latest casualty.
The new project manager for the Joint Strike Fighter will be announced in a matter of days, and
he'll have heavy burden to bear. The Joint Strike Fighter is currently the Pentagon's most
expensive weapons project ever, with defense officials putting the price tag for all the jets
requested at nearly $300 billion.
The F-35 fighter is called the "Joint" Strike Fighter because it's designed for use across the
Navy, Marine Corp, and the Air Force. The Pentagon also has plans to sell it to allies overseas
once production needs within the U.S. military have been met.
The first F-35s are expected to be operation in 2012 if all goes according to plan. The Marines
will be the first to get them and the defense community will be watching closely. From the day
an F35 rolls off the assembly to the day it's retired, it's total production cost is valued at $69
million
RETURN TO INDEX
Navy
Seeks
Boost
To
Shipbuilding
Fund,
No
Money
For
F/A-18E/F
Multi-Year
(DEFENSE DAILY 02 FEB 10) ... Geoff Fein
The Navy's $16 billion FY '11 budget request for shipbuilding includes funding for two
Littoral Combat Ships (LCS), two Virginia-class submarines and two Arleigh Burke-
class destroyers.
The shipbuilding request marks an increase of $1.1 billion from the FY '10 budget.
The Navy will buy 17 LCS over the FYDP, according to a budget document. The
service will buy two in FY '11, three in FY '12 and four every year beginning in FY '13,
'14, and '15.
The Navy's plan was to buy 10 ships by FY '14 under the new acquisition strategy
introduced last year. Teams led by General Dynamics [GD] and Lockheed Martin
[LMT] are vying to build the LCS. Both teams just received the Navy's request for
proposals last week. Responses to the RFP are due back on March 29.
While the Navy's new acquisition plan eventually calls for two yards to build a single
LCS design, Rear Adm. Joseph Mulloy, deputy assistant secretary of the Navy for
budget, told reporters during the service's briefing yesterday there has been talk
about the impact of rapidly buying out LCS and then facing the issue of block
obsolescence.
"[There is a] chance you couldn't change them again. There are a number of
competing factors in this," he said. "The bottom line is to have two sources and
maintain a steady pull to develop the ships."
The Navy plans to build eight DDG-51s over the FYDP, beginning with two in FY '11.
Mulloy noted the plan calls for a build rate of two in FY '11, one in FY '12, two in FY
'13, one in FY '14 and two in FY '15.
"We continue to build these ships for a wide variety of missions they bring," Mulloy
said. "But primarily for the BMD needs as laid out by the president's initiatives."
In addition to buying LCS, Virginia-class submarines and DDG-51s, the Navy will also
buy one LHA-R, one Maritime Landing Platform and one Joint High Speed Vessel.
The Navy will also continue with the service life extension of the LCACs and buy its
first Ship to Shore Connector, the eventual replacement for the LCAC, according to
budget documents
Boeing [BA] will see the Navy procure 12 of its EA-18Gs in FY '11 and another 24 in
FY '24.
The Navy will also buy seven of the company's P-8 Multi-Mission Maritime Aircraft.
However, the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet will see its numbers fluctuate over the FYDP.
The service will buy 22 of the tactical fighters in FY '11 but only one in FY '12 before
increasing to 25 in FY '13 for a total of 48 aircraft over the FYDP.
There is no money in the budget for a multi-year buy of Super Hornets, Mulloy said.
He added, however, that the Navy is evaluating opportunities given that the F/A-
18E/F and EA-18G are built on the same production line. And Mulloy also noted the
Navy's acquisition shop is in negotiations on this.
"But there is no money for a multi-year right now," Mulloy noted.
Additionally, the Navy will buy 13 F-35B short takeoff vertical landing variants of
Lockheed Martin's Joint Strike Fighter in FY '11, and seven of the Navy variant, the
F35- C.
DoD is restructuring the JSF program office making it a three-star billet, Defense
Secretary Robert Gates said earlier in the day.
"There were more problems than we were aware of," he told reporters.
"We can't absorb the cost we have had in this program and the delay without people
being held accountable, Gates added.
The service will buy 100 rotary aircraft in FY '11: 28 of Bell Helicopter Textron's [TXT]
AH-1Z/UH-1Ys, 30 MV-22B by a Bell-Boeing team, 24 Lockheed Martin MH60Rs and
18 MH-60S
The Navy will also buy three Fire Scout unmanned vertical takeoff unmanned air
vehicles.
All told, the Navy will buy 206 aircraft in FY '11, one less fewer than in FY '10.
The Navy will increase its buy of Raytheon's [RTN] SM-6 from 11 in FY '10 to 59 in FY
'11. However, the service will end its buy of SM-2s, only procuring eight of the
missiles in FY '11. Buys of the SM-2 Mod IIIB will also decline from 91 in FY '10 to 32
in FY '11.
The Navy will buy fewer torpedoes in FY 11, dropping to 46 of the MK 48 heavyweight
torpedoes (from 85 in FY '10) and buying none of the MK 54 lightweight torpedoes,
after buying 120 in FY '10. The Navy will resume purchasing the MK 54 LWT in FY '12,
according to budget documents.
The Navy will enter a three-year decline in the purchase of the AIM-9X, dropping to
146 in FY '11 and not seeing the number bought increase until FY '14.
On the other side, the Navy will increase its buy of Raytheon's Advanced Medium-
Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM) from 79 in FY '10 to 101 in FY '11. The Navy will
continue to increase annual purchases of the missile through the FYDP.
Raytheon's Joint Standoff Weapon (JSOW) C will also see a one-year decline in
procurement, dropping from 357 in FY '10 to 333 in FY '11.
BAE Systems' Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System (APKWS) will experience a
two-year decline, dropping from 818 in FY '10 to 575 in FY '11 and 281 in FY '12. The
Navy will then significantly increase the number of APKWS to 1,000 in FY '13,
according to budget documents.
The Navy will steadily increase its buy of ATK's [ATK] Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided
Missile (AARGM), going from 36 in FY '10 to 44 in FY '11. The Navy intends to buy
719 of the missiles over the FYDP.
The Hellfire missile will also see a jump in procurement, from 325 in FY '10 to 600 in
FY '11. The Navy intends to buy 4,600 over the FYDP.
RETURN TO INDEX
Navy
Requests
Nine
Ships,
206
Aircraft
in
FY-11;
New
Command
Ship,
EFV
Delayed
(INSIDE DEFENSE 01 FEB 10) ... Zachary M. Peterson
The Navy plans to buy nine ships and 206 aircraft with its $160.6 billion fiscal year
2011 budget request, released this afternoon. The budget terminates the CG(X)
cruiser and EPX spy plane efforts and delays the purchase of a new command ship
beyond FY-15, pushing the procurement of the Marine Corps' Expeditionary Fighting
Vehicle back by one year to correct developmental issues.
The request includes $15.7 billion in shipbuilding, including the purchase of a Joint
High Speed Vessel for the Army. The nine ships the Navy plans to buy in FY-11 are
two DDG-51 guided-missile destroyers, two Littoral Combat Ships, two Virginia-class
attack submarines, one amphibious assault ship replacement (LHA-R), one Mobile
Landing Platform and a Joint High Speed Vessel.
The $18.5 billon aircraft request would purchase 13 short-takeoff and vertical landing
(STOVL) F-35 Joint Strike Fighters for the Marine Corps, seven carrier-variant JSFs,
22 F/A-18E/F Super Hornet fighters, 12 EA-18G Growler electronic attack planes, four
E-2D Hawkeyes, seven P-8A maritime patrol aircraft, 28 AH-1Z/UH-1Y helicopters, 30
MV-22 tiltrotors, 24 MH-60R helos, 18 MH-60S helos, three MQ-8B Fire Scout
unmanned helicopters and 38 T-6A/B training jets.
Marine Corps procurement totals $1.3 billion in the request, down from $1.5 billion
requested in FY-10. Other Navy procurement in the request totals $6.5 billion. The
request also includes $17.7 billion in research and development funds.
Further, the proposed spending package includes nearly $26 billion for active-duty
Navy personnel and approximately $13.3 billion for active-duty Marines.
Today's budget announcement officially disclosed the cancellation of the CG(X)
cruiser program, for which the Pentagon cited “affordability concerns.”
“Instead of procuring CG(X), the Navy is considering other options including maturing
the air and missile defense radar program and using technologies from other similar
kinds of ships such as DDG-1000 and DDG-51 destroyers,” states the service's FY-11
budget highlights book.
Budget justification documents published by the Office of Management and Budget
outlined delays in the Marine Corps' EFV program. “Delaying procurement one year
while maintaining [research and development funding] gives the Marine Corps more
time to correct the EFV's problems before making large investments in procurement,”
the OMB document states.
Similarly, the Navy will wait until after FY-15 to move forward with plans to replace
its fleet of amphibious command ships. “The Navy is proposing to delay LCC-R
because the service life of the two command ships currently in operation can be
extended,” the justification document states.
The budget request includes $18.5 billion in Navy and Marine “overseas contingency
operations” funding to support the ongoing war effort in Afghanistan.
RETURN TO INDEX
Proposed
Defense
Budget
Paves
Way
For
Carrier
Base
In
Florida
(NEWPORT NEWS DAILY PRESS 01 FEB 10) ... Hugh Lessig
As Florida lawmakers celebrated, Virginia leaders on Monday girded for another attempt
keep an aircraft carrier and its thousands of jobs from leaving Hampton Roads.
The Defense Department is moving closer to building a permanent aircraft carrier
base in Florida, a move it justifies on strategic grounds but one that endangers
thousands of jobs in southeastern Virginia.
The Quadrennial Defense Review, formally released Monday, suggests that the Navy
plans to move a carrier out of Virginia to fulfill its plan.
"To mitigate the risk of terrorist attack, accident or natural disaster, the U.S. Navy
will home-port an East Coast carrier in Mayport, Fla," states the QDR.
All East Coast carriers are based at Naval Station Norfolk. If a carrier strike group
were to leave Hampton Roads, the job loss would be akin to a major factory
shutdown.
Virginia lawmakers have vowed to fight the move.
"This is not a done deal," said Sen. Jim Webb, a member of the Senate Armed
Services Committee.
Webb and others have pointed to the cost of upgrading Mayport, which has
accommodated older carriers but not one from the nuclear-powered fleet. Dredging
and other improvements could cost up to $1 billion, according to some estimates.
They say the strategic value of dispersing the fleet is overstated and the Navy has
more pressing fiscal needs.
Webb said he looks forward to questioning Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm.
Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, during today's meeting of the
armed services panel.
"I would be curious to see where the Navy believes that it can take a billion dollars
away from shipbuilding, weapons procurement, ship maintenance and repair, and
building a fleet in order to construct an alternate port which, on all accounts, doesn't
seem to be needed," Webb said.
Sen. Mark R. Warner added, "In a time of concern about federal spending and budget
deficits, I will be asking tough questions about this Pentagon plan to divert $700
million to $1 billion — or more — to reassign an aircraft carrier from the Norfolk naval
station."
"It would be fiscally irresponsible to spend any money on a redundant East Coast
homeport," said Rep. Glenn Nye, D-Norfolk. "The Navy has never demonstrated a
risk-based, strategic need to relocate a nuclear aircraft carrier out of Norfolk, and
with the national debt skyrocketing, the American people simply cannot afford
redundant, unnecessary projects like this."
Rep. Randy Forbes, R- Chesapeake, questioned the spending on Mayport in light of a
$1.3 billion shortfall in public shipyard infrastructure and the growing size of China's
Navy.
"I intend to demand full transparency into the decision-making behind the proposed
use of up to a billion of taxpayer dollars on a move regarded as duplicative and even
'scandalous,'" he said in a statement.
However, the language in the QDR is a clearly setback to Virginia's argument.
"It's definitely more significant than if it was just a budgetary statement, because the
QDR is supposed to be the basic strategy document for a number of years," said Bill
Hartung, director of the Arms and Security Initiative at the New America Foundation.
Florida lawmakers have already hailed the carrier move as a done deal and a coming
boon to the Jacksonville-area economy.
"The reason for moving one of the nuclear carriers from Norfolk to Mayport is so
they're not all lined up in one place like sitting ducks," said Sen. Bill Nelson, R-Fla.
Job loss will hurt
The reaction began Friday when CongressDaily, a political newsletter, posted the final
draft of the Quadrennial Defense Review on its Web site.
"This is an historic day for Mayport," said Sen. George LeMieux, R-Fla. last week. "A
nuclear carrier home-ported here is the right decision for the right reasons. In
addition to strengthening the fabric of our national security, this will mean thousands
of jobs and families for this region."
If a carrier strike group were to leave Hampton Roads, it would hit the area much
harder than the 2007 shutdown of Ford Motor Co.'s truck factory in Norfolk, which
employed 2,400 people.
That's according to the 2009 State of the Region report from Old Dominion
University. It said the gross regional product of Hampton Roads drops by 1 percent
each month a carrier task force is away from Hampton Roads. That translates into a
$900 million loss over one year.
Another opportunity for debate is the 20-person panel announced by the White House
last week to analyze the merits of the QDR and report back to Congress in the spring.
What's a QDR?
The Pentagon prepares the Quadrennial Defense Review every four years. The
document is intended to be a longer-term forecast of the nation's defense needs.
RETURN TO INDEX
F-35
Issues
From AFA –