Design Calculation with API6X

© All Rights Reserved

Als PDF, TXT **herunterladen** oder online auf Scribd lesen

748 Aufrufe

Design Calculation with API6X

© All Rights Reserved

Als PDF, TXT **herunterladen** oder online auf Scribd lesen

- API 6a Camerron Training
- Valve Torque Calculations
- 17D Changes and How It Works With 6A
- API-6A MATERIAL CLASS EXPLANATION, GATE VALVE, API-6A, PETROTRIM SERVICES
- BOP Speedloc Clamps
- Advanced Valve Technology - NASA
- Ball Valve Calculation
- Valve Design - Resources
- Casing Hanger Calculation
- Lyon's Valve Designers Hand Book Vol 1
- Material Specification Guide
- API 6A
- For API 17D.pdf
- API 6A
- Over View API Spec 6a
- The Design Of Valves And Fittings_G H Pearson.pdf
- API 6A Monogram
- CODE DIV -2 Review of the ASME Code Section VIII Division 2 – 2007.pdf
- Ball Valve Handbook
- API_6A_Specification Overviewb.pdf

Sie sind auf Seite 1von 14

Design Calculations

New Draft Standard under

Subcommittee 6

Jim Britton Cameron 17D and 16C

Paul Bunch Cameron 16A and 17D

Jean Brunjes GE 6A

Bill Carbaugh GE 16A

Maynard Chance West Engineering All specs

Chris Johnson - NOV 16A

Jim Kaculi DrilQuip 17D

Chris Kocurek Cameron 17D

John McCaskill - Expro 16C

Nigel McKie FMC 17D

Mark Miser DNV All specs

Ramon Sanpredro Stress Engineering all specs

Alireza Shirani GE All specs

API 6A, 16A, and 16C referenced the ASME

Code Section VIII Division 2, 2004 Edition,

Appendix 4.

Since referencing an obsolete spec is awkward, an

Annex (Annex I) was prepared for 16A capturing

the method from that ASME Appendix.

Subcommittee 6 proposed that the method be put

in a separate document to assure uniformity.

Create a new API standard documenting the

rules of the ASME Code, based on Annex I.

Problem: 16A and 6A used different allowable

stresses.

Stress value

Spec 6A requirement

Max SI at test

pressure

5/6 of Sy

90% of Sy

Sm for standard

materials

2/3 of Sy

2/3 of Sy

Sm for non-standard

materials

Lower of 2/3 Sy or Su

2/3 of Sy

Resolution

The task group consensus was to use the rules of

16A, since going to the slightly more conservative

6A rules would penalize 16A/16C users who had

designed to higher allowable stresses.

The 90% of Sy used in 16A and 16C is the same

as the limit in the 2004 ASME Code Section VIII

Division 2

Using only the yield strength as a basis follows

Section VIII Division 3 practice.

Changes to Annex I

Several revisions were made to the Annex I

document to clarify the requirements, including

several changes to the wording..

Information of elastic-plastic collapse was added

to the document. ASME Appendix 4 had referred

to a method in Appendix 6 on experimental stress

analysis.

The uses of limit analysis and elastic/plastic

analysis were clarified.

The requirement on the sum of the three principal

stresses was clarified as to the calculation basis.

of the new Standard

Specifications 6A, 16A and 16C should revise

their design section to direct the designer to this

new standard instead of the 2004 Code.

This may require several changes in the body of

the specifications.

Since 17D refers to 6A for design requirements,

no change is needed.

The1004 ASME Code Section VIII Division 2 can

be removed as a referenced standard, and

Standard 6X added.

The TG has finalized the draft and agreed it is

ready for ballot.

API will edit the document into standard API

format and return it to the TG for review.

After review the draft standard will be sent out for

ballot by SC6.

SC 16 and SC 17 will solicit comments from their

member companies, which will be considered

along with those from SC6 members.

API Standard 6X

API/ASME Design Calculations

1

General

This Standard describes the design analysis methodology used in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel

Code, 2004 with 2005 and 2006 addenda, Section VIII, Pressure Vessels, Division 2, Alternative

Methods, Appendix 4,

Methods are included for both elastic and elastic-plastic analysis, and for closed-form as well as finiteelement analysis methods of calculation, in accordance with the rules of Appendix 4 of the 2004 Code,

Section VIII Division 2.

API has adopted different stress limits from the 2004 ASME Code. The criteria used assume defect-free,

tough, and ductile material behavior.

For the purpose of this international standard, the basic stress limits are based on Sm and St, which are

defined as follows:

The design stress intensity is 2/3 of the minimum specified yield strength S y. For materials with high ratios

of yield strength to tensile strength, reduction of the design stress intensity should be considered.

1.2 St, the maximum allowable general primary membrane stress intensity at test

pressure

API limits this stress to 90% of the yield strength for all materials.

The effect of temperature on the mechanical properties of the material shall be considered.

Elastic Analysis

For elastic analysis stress components are calculated, combined, and compared to limits for each

category of stress based on multiples of the Design Stress Intensity, S m, for the material in use and for the

category of stress.

Stress components are combined to find the stress intensity, which is defined as twice the maximum

shear stress. This can be calculated as the difference between the largest and smallest of the three

principal stresses.

2.1

Stress Categories

The following categories are used to classify stresses based on the consequences of exceeding the yield

strength in various manners:

2.1.1

Primary Stress

The basic characteristic of primary stress is that it is not self-limiting, and failure, or at least gross

distortion, can occur from one application of the loading. Primary stress is stress caused by the

application of mechanical pressure, forces and moments. Primary stress includes both membrane and

bending stress and is linearly distributed across the wall section. Local primary stress can redistribute, like

in a threaded connector. Thermal stresses are not primary stresses.

2.1.1.1

Primary membrane stress intensity is calculated from the average values of the stress components

through the wall of the vessel. Depending on the extent of the stress, it can be classified as either

General or Local.

2.1.1.2

General Primary Membrane Stress Intensity, Pm: Membrane stress distributed in a way such that

load redistribution cannot occur, and loading beyond the yield strength can proceed to failure. P m

is limited to Sm.

Local primary Membrane Stress Intensity, PL: The following is a direct quote from ASME Section

VIII Division 2 Appendix 4:

Cases arise in which a membrane stress produced by pressure or other mechanical loading and

associated with a primary and/or a discontinuity effect would, if not limited, produce excessive

distortion in the transfer of load to other portions of the structure. Conservatism requires that such

a stress be classified as a local primary membrane stress even though it has some

characteristics of a secondary stress. A stressed region may be considered as local if the

distance over which the stress intensity exceeds 1.1 S m does not extend in the meridional

1/2

direction more than 1.0(Rt) , where R is the midsurface radius of curvature measured normal to

the surface from the axis of rotation and t is the minimum thickness in the region considered.

Regions of local primary membrane stress which exceed 1.1 Sm shall not be closer in the

1/2

meridional direction than 2.5(Rt) where R is defined as (R1 + R2)/2, and t is defined as (t1+

t2)/2, where t1 and t2 are the minimum thicknesses at each of the regions considered, and R1

and R2 are the midsurface radii of curvature measured normal to the surface from the axis of

rotation at these regions where the membrane stress exceeds 1.1 Sm. Discrete regions of local

primary membrane stress, such as those resulting from concentrated loads acting on brackets,

where the membrane stress exceeds 1.1 Sm shall be spaced so that there is no overlapping of

the areas in which the membrane stress exceeds 1.1 Sm. An example of a local primary

membrane stress is the membrane stress in a shell produced by external load and moment at a

permanent support or at a nozzle connection.

Local primary stress intensity PL is limited to 1.5 Sm.

Primary Bending Stress Intensity

The components of primary bending stress intensity Pb are calculated from the linear primary stress

component distributions that have the same net bending moment as the actual stress component

distribution. Bending stress components are defined as being proportional to the distance from the

centroid of a solid section.

When the bending stress components are combined with the membrane stress components at each

surface, the resulting stress intensities Pm+Pb are limited to 1.5 Sm.

2.1.2

Secondary Stress

Secondary stress Q is caused by the constraint of adjacent parts or by self-constraint of the structure, and

yielding can cause the magnitude of the stress to be reduced. One load cycle can cause local yielding

and stress redistribution but cannot result in failure or gross distortion.

2

Secondary stresses are membrane plus bending stresses that can occur at gross structural

discontinuities, from general thermal stress, from mechanical preload conditions, or from combinations of

these sources.

The secondary stress variation, for any sequence of test or operating conditions, is limited to 3 S m.

2.1.3

Peak Stress

Peak stress is the increment of stress added by a stress concentration or other source that does not

cause noticeable distortion. Such sources include thermal stress in a cladding material with a different

coefficient of expansion from the base material; transient thermal stress, or the non-linear portion of a

thermal stress distribution. The only concern with peak stress is that it may cause the initiation of a fatigue

crack or brittle fracture.

The total stress, including peak stress, may be used in fatigue analysis, which is beyond the scope of this

standard.

3

3.1

Bearing Stress

Bearing stress is allowed to exceed the yield strength of the material provided that the other stresses in

the vicinity of the bearing load are within acceptable limits. When bearing loads are applied to parts

having free edges, the possibility of a shear failure shall be considered.

3.2

Pure Shear

The average primary shear stress across a section loaded under design conditions in pure shear (for

example, keys, shear rings, or screw threads) shall be limited to 0.6 Sm. The maximum primary shear

under design conditions, exclusive of stress concentration at the periphery of a solid section in torsion,

shall be limited to 0.8 Sm.

For hydrostatic test conditions shear stress is limited to 0.6 St.

3.3

Screwed-on caps, screwed-in plugs, shear ring closures, breech lock closures, clamps and unions are

examples of non-integral connections which are subject to failure by bell-mouthing or other types of

progressive deformation.

If any combination of loading produces yielding, such joints are subject to ratcheting because the mating

members may slip at the end of each complete cycle, and start the next cycle in a new relationship with

one another. Additional distortion may occur at each subsequent cycle so that interlocking parts like

threads may lose engagement. Therefore, primary plus secondary stress intensities which could produce

slippage shall be limited to Sy.

The algebraic sum of the three primary principal stresses (1+2+3) shall not exceed four times the

design stress intensity Sm. The sum of the local primary membrane plus bending principal stresses shall

be used for checking this criterion.

When it is necessary to extract the membrane and bending stresses from finite-element analyses, a

numerical technique called linearization is used. This procedure involves numerical integration of the

stress components to separate the membrane and bending portion of the stress from the total stress. The

total stress includes the non-linear peak stress.

Guidance on linearization can be found in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII,

Division 2, Annex 5A.

Non-linear analysis

4.1

General

The limits on primary and secondary stresses need not be satisfied if thorough non-linear finite element

analyses are performed.

Limit Analysis can be used for determining the actual rated load capacity but not assessing local strain,

ratcheting or shakedown. Plastic Analysis can be used for assessing local strain, ratcheting and

shakedown but not determining the actual rated load capacity.

Limit analysis assumes elastic-perfectly plastic material properties, and may be based on smalldisplacement analysis. The stress-strain curve that is used has a bi-linear representation. This curve, for

stress less than the yield strength has a slope equal to the elastic modulus of the material. Above yield,

the slope is as near zero as practical. A zero slope can cause numerical problems in most finite-element

programs when yield is exceeded.

The yield strength to be used is 1.5 Sm, which for non-standard materials may be less than the actual

specified minimum yield strength. Loading is incrementally increased until the model diverges, which is

the collapse load. Actual rated load capacity can be no more than 2/3 of the limit analysis collapse

loading.

Limit analysis may be used to justify high primary stresses but not secondary stresses. In addition, limit

analysis cannot be used to justify a wall thickness thinner than that calculated on an elastic membrane

stress basis.

Plastic analysis is a method of structural analysis by which the structural behaviour under given loads is

computed by considering the actual material stress-strain curve and may assume small or large

deformation theory as required. This method is more accurate than limit analysis because strain

hardening effects are included.

The material stress-strain curve may be obtained by either actual material test data or approximated via

analytical methods using minimum specified yield and ultimate tensile strength values (for example,

ASME, Sect. VIII Div.2, Annex 3D).

If a stress-strain curve from actual testing is used, appropriate corrections may be needed to ensure that

the data used in the analysis is representative of the minimum specified yield strength of the material. The

effect of temperature on material properties shall be considered.

The design is satisfactory if the design loads do not exceed two-thirds of the elastic-plastic collapse load

as defined below and the limit analysis is satisfactory.

The elastic-plastic collapse criterion is defined as follows: Plot one or more curves of deformation vs.

loading. Deflection may be the actual deflection at a point or it may be the strain at a highly-stressed

location. The loading should be applied in steps and should include all loads on the product.

Select a point Y in the elastic (linear) portion of the curve. Call the deformation at that point x. Plot

another point at a distance of 2x from the vertical axis. Now extend a line from the origin through the new

point until it reached the actual load-deformation curve. The load at that point is the elastic-plastic

collapse load.

4.4

Shakedown Analysis

Shakedown analysis can be used to justify high local primary and secondary stresses. Actual true-stress

and true-strain curves are to be used as they are used for plastic analysis in section 4.3.

The design is acceptable if shakedown occurs. That is, after successive applications of the design

loading, there is no progressive distortion or stress ratcheting. In addition the deformations which occur

prior to shakedown shall not exceed specified functional limits of the design. It is acceptable to include the

effect of hydrostatic testing as well as operational loading.

- API 6a Camerron TrainingHochgeladen vonJoher
- Valve Torque CalculationsHochgeladen vonrubicon79
- 17D Changes and How It Works With 6AHochgeladen vonbevishal2006
- API-6A MATERIAL CLASS EXPLANATION, GATE VALVE, API-6A, PETROTRIM SERVICESHochgeladen vonPetrotrim Services
- BOP Speedloc ClampsHochgeladen vonMichael Tayactac
- Advanced Valve Technology - NASAHochgeladen vonDraveilois
- Ball Valve CalculationHochgeladen vonKamlesh Dalavadi
- Valve Design - ResourcesHochgeladen vonsolaank16
- Casing Hanger CalculationHochgeladen vonCherry Cardona
- Lyon's Valve Designers Hand Book Vol 1Hochgeladen vonBuzurjmeher
- Material Specification GuideHochgeladen vonganeshan
- API 6AHochgeladen vonNalla Gane
- For API 17D.pdfHochgeladen vonMartinus Luckyanto
- API 6AHochgeladen vonumairahmedbaig
- Over View API Spec 6aHochgeladen vonAlejandro Garcia Fonseca
- The Design Of Valves And Fittings_G H Pearson.pdfHochgeladen vonJyotirmoy Karmakar
- API 6A MonogramHochgeladen vonCandy Kendee
- CODE DIV -2 Review of the ASME Code Section VIII Division 2 – 2007.pdfHochgeladen vonManish542
- Ball Valve HandbookHochgeladen vonGanesh Yadav
- API_6A_Specification Overviewb.pdfHochgeladen vonjotaviobg
- Surface Systems Wellhead Training File (10 Puntos)Hochgeladen vonClaudio Aguirre
- Valve Handbook (Theory and Practice)Hochgeladen vonana_pq
- WOM Wellhead and X-mas ReferenceHochgeladen vonAli Manshur
- API St 6X-2019Hochgeladen vonArash Abbasi
- API 6A Pressure EquipmentHochgeladen vonLee Sweningson
- RP-002393 Cab Comp Integral CameronHochgeladen vonrps1977
- API 16C Choke and kill.xlsHochgeladen vonrps1977
- Open Thrust Calculation for ValveHochgeladen vonPrashant Malve
- API Spec 6a MaterialHochgeladen vonFathur Deka Aprianda

- Pipe Thread Types and DesignationsHochgeladen vonvijayn33
- Weld Longitudinal Tensile Results After Heat Treatment 12 Samples MMT61179Hochgeladen vonchau nguyen
- 1 Guide for Wps Pqr WpqrHochgeladen vonNatraji
- White Star Quatro BrochureHochgeladen vonchau nguyen
- OTC 17691 Pressure Testing BallisticsHochgeladen vonchau nguyen
- Acme Thread DesignstdHochgeladen vonFilipe Martinho
- Iopf Paper Qualification Testing 04 Final1Hochgeladen vonchau nguyen
- Merging ASME and API Design Methods for Subsea Equipment Up to 25,000 PSI Working Pressure Otc23063Hochgeladen vonchau nguyen
- 5 Hpht API 6x - FowlerHochgeladen vonchau nguyen
- Francis Lai - Love Story - Where Do I BeginHochgeladen vonMadhusudhanan Ramanujam
- Yield Strength of Common Structural SteelsHochgeladen vonchau nguyen
- Ankle ExercisesHochgeladen vonIvan Fraguta-Maria
- 1 - Ring Groove Dimensional ChartHochgeladen vonchau nguyen
- Analysis of Bolting in Flanged ConnectionsHochgeladen vonFanel Bucur
- Closed Form Seabed Interaction Models for SCRHochgeladen vonchau nguyen
- Flag EffectHochgeladen vonchau nguyen

- stress strain diagramHochgeladen vonMartine Castro
- CEB5061 Geoengineering Foundations MaterialsHochgeladen von123456
- GUIDELINES FOR REPLACEMENT OF BAKAU PILES FOR COMMON DID STRUCTURESHochgeladen vonezarul fitri
- Ch 6 Mechanical Properties of MetalsHochgeladen vonMohanad Jalloud
- Fea DescriptionHochgeladen vonJimmy Domingo
- A macro-element model for masonry-infilled structural framesHochgeladen vonMohamed
- Kangaroo Release Notes SsHochgeladen vonDragos Gunman
- 16_5_367Hochgeladen vonDevang Patel
- Bridge Configurations and Details That Improve SeismicHochgeladen vonKhoo Hui Kiang
- Pavement DesignHochgeladen vonNiraj Bohara
- Prediction of the Dynamic Modulus of ElasticityHochgeladen vonainosbarba
- Linear Analysis of Guyed MastHochgeladen vonPankaj Taneja
- Fatigue Crack Growth and Threshold Measurements at Very High Frequencies (1)Hochgeladen vonFrancesco Montagnoli
- Experiment 1_Full Lab Report_Group A_v1.1Hochgeladen vonMichael K Gooneratne
- Biaxial BendingHochgeladen vonstylistik
- 02110000 2Hochgeladen vonfifafifa
- Properties of Concrete for Use in Eurocode 2[1]Hochgeladen vonoqusous
- young mod graphHochgeladen vonapi-254547723
- Plastic SoilHochgeladen vonSanjithRNair
- ANSYS-Mechanical-APDL-Theory-Reference.pdfHochgeladen vonNam Vo
- 03_Elements of the Theory of PlasticityHochgeladen vonsingulani
- The Importance of SteelHochgeladen vonJason Speid
- Holding down arrangements.docHochgeladen vonJitendra Kumar
- Concrete Elasticity ModulusHochgeladen vonEalangi Ionut
- Strength of Materials_2Hochgeladen vonaftab_civil2006
- 4 Joints in BuildingsHochgeladen vonDipesh
- Basics of EHL for Practical ApplicationHochgeladen vonAnibal Rios
- STRUCTURE OF ENGINEERING MATERIALSHochgeladen vonjust_killing_ppl
- Three-dimensional viscoelastic simulation of woven compositeHochgeladen vonGeorgiana Dumitru
- OMAE2011-Detailed Contact Analysis of the J Tube Riser Pull in MethodHochgeladen vonKaushik Kumar Sirvole

## Viel mehr als nur Dokumente.

Entdecken, was Scribd alles zu bieten hat, inklusive Bücher und Hörbücher von großen Verlagen.

Jederzeit kündbar.