Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
izkX/kkjk] vad&21&22
Tami~-Brhm should be called as Dami~i. Keeping in
view of the growing knowledge in this field, the term
Dami~i (Tami~-Brhm) is used in this article to
differentiate from Aokan-Brhm and also for better
understanding and wider acceptability. The close
observations of the Dami~i (Tami~-Brhm) and Sri
Lankan Brhm scripts suggest that they had closer
relations with each other than the Aokan-Brhm.
Irrespective of their successful decipherment, the
origin and date of Brhm script still elude the scholars
as they were mostly recovered from non-perishable
material like on rock-surface, metal objects and
potsherds. The non-availability of the script written
on organic material prevented us in fixing the date
scientifically. Thus, the study of palaeography,
orthography and archaeological stratigraphy
predominate the scene in assigning the date to Brhm
script which initiated much debate among the
epigraphists and archaeologists due to its ambiguity.
However, the recent evidences observed at
Koumaal, Porunthal, Pulimkmbai and
Ththappai in Tamil Nadu and at Anurdhapura in
Sri Lanka shed some light on the chronology of the
script.
Excavations at Porunthal
280
281
izkX/kkjk] vad&21&22
282
Fig. 9:
283
izkX/kkjk] vad&21&22
Fig. 10:
Fig. 11:
285
izkX/kkjk] vad&21&22
Fig. 12:
286
izkX/kkjk] vad&21&22
Fig. 14:
289
izkX/kkjk] vad&21&22
Few graffiti marks were found engraved at the end
portion of the Dami~i (Tami~-Brhm) inscription.
Though the exact meaning of these symbols,
individually or in compound form, cannot be easily
guessed but the close observation of these symbols,
their places of occurrence, frequency and position
clear-ly demonstrate that they were used to
communicate certain messages and the future
decipherment alone would clear its significance.
Writing System
Graffiti bearing potsherds were mostly recovered from
the earlier and middle levels. The more common
graffiti marks are sun, swastika, star, ladder,
nandipda, fish, bow and arrow, wheel, cart, etc.
290
The second writing system is the famous Tami~Brhm script. Nearly 204 Tami~-Brhm inscribed
potsherds (172 by the Tamil University and
remaining 32 by the State archaeology) in six
seasons of excavations have been recovered.12 The
recent excavations conducted in May 2012 yielded
about 130 inscribed potsherds. These were all
recovered from less than 1% of excavated area. The
inscribed potsherds were recovered throughout the
1.85m cultural deposit. In 50 acres of habitation
(about 20 hactares/200,000 sq.m), 1325 sq.m
area has been excavated which constitutes merely
0.6 % of the total area. In less than 1% area, we
could collect more than 300 inscribed potsherds. If
the remaining area is exposed, one may get more
than 20,000 inscribed potsherds. This quantified
assessment is provided just to understand the
enormity of the situation as well as the level of
literacy. This is not unique to Koumaal alone, this
state of affairs also repeated in other sites like Karr,
the capital of Chras. In Tamil Nadu, the availability
of the inscription is wide spread and it is found on
different media like on stone, coins, seals and
potsherds. It is found throughout Tamil Nadu. The
content of the inscription is both secular and nonsecular in character. This script has been dated
based on palaeography and archaeological
stratigraphy. The scholars like Iravatham Mahadevan13
and Subbarayalu14 considered this as post-Aoka
Fig. 18 :
Radiometric dates
The paddy grains collected from a four-legged jar
placed as grave goods in a Early Historic megalithic
grave (Meg-I) at Porunthal site were sent for
radiometric dates (Beta-302854). The acid washes
were the pre-treatment provided to the sample. The
sample provided plenty of carbon for an accurate
measurement and the analysis proceeded normally.
The measured radio carbon age is 2430 30 BP
and the uncalibrated conventional age is 2440 30
izkX/kkjk] vad&21&22
Fig. 19 :
Fig. 20 :
293
izkX/kkjk] vad&21&22
Kodumanal. To mitigate this vexing problem, the
charcoal sample collected from the trench KDLZD10 at the depth of 85-90 cm was sent for
radiometric dates (Beta-330303). The acid washes
were the pre-treatment provided to the sample. The
sample provided plenty of carbon for an accurate
measurement and the analysis proceeded normally.
The measured radio carbon age is 2270 30 BP
and the uncalibrated conventional age is 2280 30
BP with 13C/12C ratio factor of-24.2 o/oo. Thus,
the sample has been dated to 2280 30 BP
i.e 330 BCE (Cal. 380 BCE).
The maximum cultural deposit containing Dami~i
(Tami~-Brhm) inscribed potsherds in association with
Prakrit-Brhm obtained at Koumaal is 1.85 cm
and these deposits were generally found in the
northern part of the mound. The present four trenches
were laid towards the centre part of the mound and
yielded 1.20 cm cultural deposit. The date of 330
BCE has been assigned to a charcoal material
obtained at the depth of 85-90 cm and it is
considered as the middle part of the total cultural
deposit. There is another 30 cm cultural deposit in
this trench (KDL-ZD10) and about a 100 cm
cultural deposit in other trenches. One may assign
one or two centuries for the one metre cultural
deposit lying below this dated layer. Even the
conservative estimate takes the earliest deposit to 5th
century BCE. This confirms the Porunthal dates
mentioned above.
Post Script
After submission of the manuscript, two more AMS
dates were obtained from Arizona AMS Laboratory.
The charcoal sample (AA99856) collected from the
trench KDL-ZE10 at the depth of 60 cm yielded a
date of 2225 41BP (275 BCE) and another sample
(AA99855) collected from the trench KDL-ZE9 at
the depth of 120 cm yielded a date of 2358 40
BP (408 BCE). This confirms our earlier assumption.
Further, the first date is obtained from Beta Analytic
Lab and the rest two from Arizona AMS Laboratory.
There is a consistency in all the three dates obtained
from two different laboratories. Thus, the three
samples collected at the depth of 60 cm, 85 cm
and 120 cm yielded uncalibrated dates of 275
BCE, 330 BCE and 408 BCE. As stated above, the
total cultural deposit at the site is 185 cm and there
is still 65 cm thick cultural deposit containing Brhm
inscribed potsherds below this level, thereby every
possiibility of pushing the date further back to 5-6th
century BCE. The future results alone would
strengthen our point.
References
1.
294
2.
3.
4.
Madras, pp.275-300.
Rajan, K., V.P.Yatheeskumar and S.Selvakumar
2007. "The Earliest Herostones of India",
History Today, vol.7, pp.118-121.
Rajan, K. and V.P.Yatheeskumar
2007a.
""Thathappatti: Tamil-Brhm inscribed hero
stone', Man and Environment, vol.33, no.1,
pp.39-45.
Dr. K. Rajan
Professor
Department of History
Pondicherry University
Pondicherry (Tamilnadu) INDIA