Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
www.fuelfirst.com
Department of Agricultural and Food Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, WB 721302, India
b
Uttarbanga Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Pundibari, Coochbehar, WB, India
c
Division of Agronomy, Central Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Orissa 753006, India
Received 19 November 2003; received in revised form 30 September 2004; accepted 7 October 2004
Available online 13 December 2004
Abstract
In sub-tropical climate the high rainfall and high temperature is responsible for low soil productivity due to losses of bases and low organic
matter content in soil. In acid lateritic soil low availability of P and high content of Al and Fe posses nutritional imbalance which is generally
corrected by lime materials. Alkaline fly ash can be used in such problematic soil as an amended material and also it acts as source of plant
nutrition for crop production. An attempt was made to develop an integrated plant nutrient supply system utilizing the fly ash along with other
organic wastes like paper factory sludge, farm yard manure, crop residue and chemical fertilizers for ricepeanut cropping system. Direct and
residual effects of fly ash were assessed based on crop yield, nutrient uptake and changes in soil characteristics. The application 10 t haK1 of
fly ash in combination with organic sources and chemical fertilizer increased the grain yield and nutrient uptake of rice, and pod yield of
peanut compared to chemical fertilizers alone. The heavy metal contents in plant and soil system was analyzed and found to remain below the
permissible level. The results indicated that fly ash could be applied safely to tropical agro eco-systems for retaining productivity of acid
lateritic soil.
q 2004 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Keywords: Fly ash; Integrated plant nutrient supply system; Heavy metal content
1. Introduction
In intensively cropped tropical soil, indiscriminate use of
chemical fertilizers has resulted in low organic matter
content and imbalance in nutrient supply by depletion of
essential micronutrients. Moreover in acidic soil, such
problems are aggravated due to fixation of phosphorus by
iron and aluminium, besides less availability of micronutrient like molybdenum. This has resulted in low and
inconsistent production of crop yield in rice based cropping
systems. This calls for development of an integrated nutrient
management system by supplying organic and inorganic
sources of fertilizers and for improving physical and
chemical properties of soil. One of the possible ways of
enhancing productivity of acid lateritic soil is use of alkaline
* Corresponding author. Tel.: C91 3222 283120; fax: C91 3222
255303/282700/277239.
E-mail address: bcg@agfe.iitkgp.ernet.in (B.C. Ghosh).
0016-2361/$ - see front matter q 2004 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2004.10.019
1448
Table 1a
Selected properties of soil
Parameter
Texture
Bulk density (g/cm3)
Field capacity (%) at 33 K Pa
Permanent wilting point (%) at 15 K Pa
pH (soil:water, 1:2.5)
CEC (c mole kgK1)
Organic carbon (g/kg)
Total nitrogen (g/kg)
Total phosphorus (g/kg)
Total potash (g/kg)
Total sulphur (g/kg)
Total calcium (g/kg)
Total magnesium (g/kg)
Total iron (g/kg)
Total boron (mg/kg)
Available nitrogen (mg/kg)
Available phosphorus (mg/kg)
Available potassium (mg/kg)
Available calcium (mg/kg)
Available magnesium (mg/kg)
Available sulphur (mg/kg)
Available iron (mg/kg)
Available manganese (mg/kg)
Available zinc (mg/kg)
Available copper (mg/kg)
FYM
PFS
FA
0.50
5.92a
2.266
0.125
0.035
0.068
0.020
0.015
0.053
282.60
135.10
44.30
15.30
0.43
5.64
2.56
5.40
0.62
5.45a
2.006
0.071
0.016
0.036
0.014
0.014
0.034
398.20
344.90
126.30
16.30
0.39
6.85
3.12
6.52
0.96
8.47b
0.034
0.005
0.003
0.018
0.042
0.022
0.092
288.20
25.80
21.50
12.00
2.24
0.21
1.23
1.95
3.18
a
b
1449
Table 2
Grain and straw yield (kg haK1) of rice and pod and haulm yield (kg haK1) and nodules per plant and yield attributes of peanut as influenced by direct
application of different fertilization treatments on rice and their residual as well as direct effect of chemical fertilizer on peanut in ricepeanut cropping system
Treatment
Control
FA
CF
FACCF
FYMCCF
FACFYMCCF
LCFYMCCF
PFSCCF
FACPFSCCF
LCPFSCCF
CRCCF
FACCRCCF
LSD (pZ0.05)
Rice
Peanut
Grain
Straw
Pod
Haulm
Nodule number
per plant
Hundred kernel
weight (g)
Number of
pod per plant
2019
2208
3745
4014
3998
4210
3761
3980
4174
3734
3948
4088
426
2697
2208
4730
4925
4723
5000
4662
4962
5261
4694
4877
5206
608
1239
2565
2396
2791
2716
2945
3122
2734
2977
3039
2806
2967
408
2566
4600
4625
4725
4624
4789
4779
4433
4771
4666
4812
4979
704
380.04
70.04
60.0
78.5
81.5
95.5
110.2
80.0
94.5
100.6
77.5
89.7
8.4
37.2
40.5
39.4
40.7
39.0
41.2
41.4
39.2
40.5
40.6
40.8
41.2
2.4
9.0
16.0
13.0
17.0
16.8
17.6
17.2
16.2
18.0
18.0
16.5
17.4
3.5
Rice grain
equivalent
yielda (kg/ha)
2559
4310
4868
5496
5406
5798
5784
5406
5809
5666
5482
5753
416
FA, fly ash; CF, chemical fertilizer; FYM, farm yard manure; L, lime; PFS, paper factory sludge; CR, crop residue.
a
Rice equivalent yield is calculated on the basis of value of the produce of rice grain and peanut pod and converted into rice equivalent yield.
1450
Table 3
Effect of different fertilization sources on total nutrients uptake by wet season rice
Fertilization source
N
(kg haK1)
P
(kg haK1)
K
(kg haK1)
Ca
(kg haK1)
Mg
(kg haK1)
Fe
(g haK1)
Mn
(g haK1)
Zn
(g haK1)
Cu
(g haK1)
Co
(g haK1)
CF
FA10
FYMCCF
FYMCFA10CCF
FYMCFA5CCF
FYMCL2CCF
PFSCCF
PFSCFA10CCF
PFSCFA5CCF
PFSCL2CCF
Control
LSD (pZ0.05)
93.78
46.38
76.11
93.87
78.67
103.15
80.47
105.74
97.85
108.21
37.88
14.79
25.06
15.76
23.76
27.45
23.88
25.34
25.26
29.19
28.22
27.91
12.27
4.22
82.53
45.07
76.49
85.59
75.90
87.36
81.36
92.95
89.72
90.66
39.89
13.43
9.480
5.623
9.669
11.818
9.897
17.093
11.063
14.625
13.139
17.724
4.521
2.054
8.146
4.779
8.489
10.815
9.648
12.228
8.894
11.468
10.665
12.672
3.676
1.668
2303.6
1095.3
1712.1
1473.9
1483.9
1085.1
2002.9
1925.0
21.04.0
1218.6
1030.9
282.7
1064.9
652.4
1152.6
1616.7
1346.5
1526.3
1202.1
1396.6
1266.8
1436.7
539.8
221.2
339.1
175.9
354.5
408.9
356.8
382.8
384.9
452.0
427.1
405.4
164.1
69.4
74.1
35.5
85.4
87.6
82.4
70.7
100.0
106.7
106.8
77.9
33.7
14.1
0.11
6.17
10.56
15.33
13.59
10.94
14.17
20.74
19.06
11.74
4.74
2.50
FA, fly ash; CF, chemical fertilizer; FYM, farm yard manure; L, lime; PFS, paper factory sludge.
4. Effect on peanut
The pod yield of peanut was higher under residual
fertility of FA and CF treatment or lime based treatment.
The residual effect of FA or lime from previous rice crop
along with direct application of only CF to peanut crop
increased the pod yield as compared to continuous
application of only CF (Table 2). Application of FYM or
PFS in a rice peanut cropping system help to build up
organic carbon content in the soil (Fig. 1) and thereby
expected to supply adequate nutrients to the succeeding crop
of peanut. This might have resulted higher uptake of nutrient
elements which has shown increasing number of nodules
and other associated yield attributing characters and pod
yield (Table 2). Application of FA reduced bulk density of
soil which might have helped better pegging and pod
formation.
Application of PFS and FYM along with FA and CF
increased the content of Zn, Cu, and Co in grain of rice as
compared to the treatment where only CF was applied.
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act sets limits of 100 ppm
Zn, 50 ppm Cu, 5 ppm As and 1.5 ppm Cd in food so the
concentration of these elements in the present investigation
remain within the safe range.
4.1. Effect on soil fertility
The changes in soil properties like bulk density, organic
carbon and pH were recorded after experimentation.
Chemical fertilizer application supplemented with FA and
PFS or CR decreased bulk density and increased organic
carbon or pH of soil (Fig. 1). The combined application of
PFS and CF with or without FA showed comparable result
to that of FYM in similar combination. The bulk density
under treatment combinations of FA along with PFS or CR
was reduced, while it remained unchanged under CF and
control treatment. The reduction in bulk density in soil was
because of lower bulk density of FA (0.93 Mg mK3) and
also organic materials (0.460.61 Mg mK3) as compared to
Saving of chemical
fertilizers (%)
P2O5
K2 O
37.5
45.8
22
33.5
N
Chemical
fertilizer (CF)
OrganicCCF
OrganicC
FACCF
P2O5
K2O
34.40
34.40
45.87
32
69.6
37.20
45.36
37.20
45.36
49.60
60.48
OrganicZmean of FYM and PFS at 30 kg N haK1 for rice and half of these
doses for peanut. FA, fly ash; CF, chemical fertilizer.
1451
5. Conclusion
The study based on short duration experimentation
concludes that there is an ample scope for safe utilization
of different industrial wastes including fly ash in combination with chemical fertilizer for improving soil fertility
and augmenting yield of both rice and peanut in acid
lateritic soil. Thus, fly ash can be incorporated with safe in
soil as a soil ameliorates and also source of Ca, Mg and
micronutrients particularly in acidic soil. Such utilization of
industrial waste in an integrated manner can save chemical
fertilizer to greater extent. However, the long term effect of
use of fly ash in agricultural field on accumulation of
micronutrients particularly boron and heavy metals needs
investigation.
References
[1] Chang AC, Lund LJ, Page AL, Warneke JE. Physical properties of fly
ash amended soils. J Environ Qual 1977;6(3):26770.
[2] George J, Mittra BN. Effect of application of fly ash and paper factory
sludge as source of micronutrient on the performance of sweet potato.
Abstracts; International Meet Tropical tuber crops. 912 December,
Trivandrum, India, 1996. 61 pp.
[3] Ghodrati M, Sims JT, Vasilas BL. Evaluation of fly ash as a soil
amendment for the Atlantic coastal plain. I. Soil hydraulic properties
and elemental leaching. J Water Soil Air Pollut 1995;81:34961.
[4] Khan RK, Khan MW. Environ Pollut 1996;92:10511.
[5] Prasad B, Singh AP. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 1980;28:4658.
[6] Rasp H, Koch E. Waste material from paper manufacture and its
utilization in Agricultureone experience. In: Kongress band,
Gottirgen. VOLUFAVERLAG; 1992. p. 3458.
[7] Sims JT, Vasilas BL, Ghodarti M. Water Air Soil Pollut 1995;81:
36372.
[8] Taylor EM, Schumann GE. Fly ash and lime amendment of acidic
coal soil to aid revegetation. J Environ Qual 1988;17:1204.
[9] Tripathi A, Sahu RK. Effect of coal fly ash on growth and yield of
wheat. J Environ Biol 1997;18(2):1315.
[10] Zhang X, Campbell AG, Mahler RL. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal
1993;24:1112.