Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
299
Center for Natural Product Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, MS-38677, USA.
of Pharmacognosy, University of Mississippi, MS-38677, USA.
3Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USA.
2Department
ABSTRACT
Effect of different photosynthetic photon flux densities (0, 500, 1000, 1500 and 2000 mol m-2s -1), temperatures (20, 25,
30, 35 and 40 oC) and CO 2 concentrations (250, 350, 450, 550, 650 and 750 mol mol -1) on gas and water vapour exchange
characteristics of Cannabis sativa L. were studied to determine the suitable and efficient environmental conditions for its
indoor mass cultivation for pharmaceutical uses. The rate of photosynthesis (PN) and water use efficiency (WUE) of Cannabis
sativa increased with photosynthetic photon flux densities (PPFD) at the lower temperatures (20-25 o C). At 30 oC, PN and
WUE increased only up to 1500 mol m-2s -1 PPFD and decreased at higher light levels. The maximum rate of photosynthesis
(PN max ) was observed at 30 oC and under 1500 mol m-2s -1 PPFD. The rate of transpiration (E) responded positively to
increased PPFD and temperature up to the highest levels tested (2000 mol m -2s -1 and 40 0C). Similar to E, leaf stomatal
conductance (gs ) also increased with PPFD irrespective of temperature. However, gs increased with temperature up to 30 oC
only. Temperature above 30 oC had an adverse effect on gs in this species. Overall, high temperature and high PPFD showed
an adverse effect on PN and WUE. A continuous decrease in intercellular CO 2 concentration (Ci) and therefore, in the ratio
of intercellular CO2 to ambient CO 2 concentration (Ci/Ca) was observed with the increase in temperature and PPFD. However,
the decrease was less pronounced at light intensities above 1500 mol m-2s -1. In view of these results, temperature and light
optima for photosynthesis was concluded to be at 25-30 oC and ~1500 mol m -2s -1 respectively. Furthermore, plants were
also exposed to different concentrations of CO2 (250, 350, 450, 550, 650 and 750 mol mol-1) under optimum PPFD and
temperature conditions to assess their photosynthetic response. Rate of photosynthesis, WUE and Ci decreased by 50 %,
53 % and 10 % respectively, and Ci/Ca, E and gs increased by 25 %, 7 % and 3 % respectively when measurements were
made at 250 mol mol-1 as compared to ambient CO2 (350 mol mol -1) level. Elevated CO2 concentration (750 mol mol1) suppressed E and g ~ 29% and 42% respectively, and stimulated P , WUE and Ci by 50 %, 111 % and 115 % respectively
s
N
as compared to ambient CO2 concentration. The study reveals that this species can be efficiently cultivated in the range of
25 to 30 oC and ~1500 mol m -2s -1 PPFD. Furthermore, higher P N, WUE and nearly constant Ci/Ca ratio under elevated CO2
concentrations in C. sativa, reflects its potential for better survival, growth and productivity in drier and CO2 rich environment.
[Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2008; 14(4) : 299-306] E-mail : suman@olemiss.edu
Key words : Cannabis sativa, Photosynthesis, Transpiration, Water use efficiency
Abbreviations : PPFD - Photosynthetic photon flux density, PN - Photosynthesis, Rd Dark respiration, PN max - Maximum
rate of photosynthesis, E - Transpiration, gs - Leaf stomatal conductance, Ci - Leaf internal CO2 concentration, Ci/Ca - Internal
to ambient CO2 concentration, WUE - Water use efficiency
300
Chandra et al.
20
15
20
25
30
35
40
10
5
0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
-2 -1
P ho ton F lux D ensity ( molm s )
Dark Respiration
( mol m-2 s -1)
25
Net Photosynthesis
( mol m -2 s-1)
301
0
20
25
30
35
40
Tem peratu re ( C )
Fig. 1. A. Variations in net photosynthesis in C. sativa with
varying photosynthetic photon flux densities (PPFD) and
temperature conditions. B. The temperature dependence of
Dark respiration in Cannabis sativa.
302
Chandra et al.
300
Stomatal Conductance
-2 -1
( mmol m s )
250
200
Rate of Transpiration
-2 -1
(mmol m s )
20
25
30
35
40
150
100
4
20
25
30
35
40
50
0
0
500
1000
1500
-2
2000
-1
P h o to n F lu x D e n sity ( mol m s )
500
1000
1500
-2
2000
-1
P h o to n F lu x D e n s ity ( m o l m s )
Fig. 3. Variations in rate of transpiration in C. sativa with
varying photosynthetic photon flux densities (PPFD) and
temperature conditions.
300
( l L-1 )
400
303
200
20
25
30
35
40
100
2
20
25
30
35
40
0
0
500
1000
1500
2000
500
1000
1500
-2
2000
-1
Table 1. Effect of different photosynthetic photon flux density and temperature conditions on Ci/Ca ratio in the
leaves of Cannabis sativa.
Temperature ( 0C)
Light Intensities
(mol m-2s -1)
20
25
30
35
40
000
1.04 0.12
1.04 0.14
1.02 0.11
1.01 0.09
1.01 0.07
500
0.82 0.05
0.79 0.06
0.74 0.06
0.71 0.06
0.68 0.05
1000
0.80 0.06
0.75 0.04
0.66 0.06
0.59 0.04
0.57 0.06
1500
0.71 0.04
0.62 0.06
0.58 0.05
0.51 0.05
0.45 0.04
2000
0.70 0.06
0.61 0.05
0.57 0.05
0.50 0.04
0.43 0.03
304
Chandra et al.
Table 2. Effect of different levels of CO 2 on net photosynthesis (PN), transpiration (E), stomatal conductance (gs),
internal CO2 concentration (Ci), Ratio of internal to external CO2 concentration (Ci/Ca) and water use
efficiency (WUE) on the leaves of Cannabis sativa.
CO 2 levels
PN
gs
Ci
Ci/Ca
WUE
(mol CO2
m -2s -1)
(mmol H2O
m -2s -1)
(mmol CO2
m -2s -1)
(l L-1)
ratio
100
250
12.48 1.76
5.69 0.47
202.76 19.78
138.00 11.42
0.55
2.19
350
24.64 2.24
5.31 0.35
195.99 18.40
202.00 14.00
0.47
4.64
450
24.76 1.89
5.76 0.44
189.78 16.97
260.00 19.34
0.58
4.30
550
26.54 2.12
4.87 0.38
148.37 13.99
330.00 22.47
0.60
5.46
650
30.48 2.76
4.65 0.76
136.08 12.36
385.00 33.24
0.61
6.56
750
36.80 3.18
3.75 0.33
112.76 10.32
435.00 37.23
0.58
9.81
REFERENCES
Aguirre-von Wobeser E, Figueroa FL and Calello-Pasini A
(2000). Effect of UV-B radiation in photoinhibition of
marine macrophytes in culture systems. J. Appl. Phycol.,
12: 159-168.
Alexander JD, Donnelly JR and Shane JB (1995).
Photosynthetic and transpirational response of red
spruce an understory tree to light and temperature. Tree
Physiol., 15: 393-398.
Ayuko U, Tadahiko M and Amane M (2008). Effects of
temperature on photosynthesis and plant growth in the
assimilation shoots of a rose. Soil Sci. Plant Nutrition,
54: 253-258.
Bazzaz FA and Garbutt K (1988). The response of annuals
in competitive neighborhoods: Effect of elevated CO2.
Ecology, 69: 937-946.
Berry J and Bijorkman O (1980). Photosynthetic response
and adaptation to temperature in higher plants. Ann.
Rev. Plant Physiol., 31: 491-543.
Berry JA and Downtown WJS (1982). Environmental
regulation of photosynthesis. In: Development carbon
metabolism and plant productivity, vol. II (ed.
Govindgee), Academic press, New York, pp. 263-343.
Bowes G (1993). Facing the inevitable: Plant and increasing
atmospheric CO2. Annu. Rev. Plant Pysiol. Plant Mol.
Biol., 44: 309-332.
Brenneisen R, Egli A, ElSohly MA, Henn V and Spiess Y
(1996). The effect of orally and rectally administered
D 9-tetrahydrocannabinol on spasticity. A pilot study
with two pettients. Internat. J. Clin. Pharmacol.
Therap., 34: 446.
Cure JD (1985). Carbon dioxide doubling response: A crop
survey. In: Direct effect of CO 2 on vegetation (Eds.
Strain BR and Cure JD), US Department of Energy
Washington, pp: 99-116.
Cure JD and Acock B (1986). Crop response to carbon
dioxide doubling: A literature survey. Agric. For.
Meteorol., 38: 127-145.
Dieleman JA and Meinen E (2008). Interacting effects of
temperature integration and light intensity on growth
and development of single-stemmed cut rose plants.
Scientia Hort., 113: 182-187.
Doyle E and Spence AA (1995). Cannabis as a medicine?
Brit. J. Anaesth., 74: 359-361.
Drake BG, Gonzalez-Meler MA and Long SP (1997). More
efficient plants: A consequence of rising CO 2 ? Annu.
Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 48: 609-639.
Eamus D, Berryman DA and Duff GA (1993). Assimilation,
stomatal conductance, specific leaf area and chlorophyll
responses to elevated CO 2 of Maranthes corymbosa, a
tropical monsoon rain forest species. Aust. J. Plant
Physiol., 20: 741-755.
Formukong EA, Evans AT and Evans F (1989). The medicinal
uses of Cannabis and its constitutents. J. Phytother.
Res., 3: 219-231.
305
306
Chandra et al.