Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
07
2015
ARRIVAL OF
PARTICIPANTS
IN GUAYAQUIL
11.07
2015
TRAINING
KICK-OFF +
WELCOME
12.07
2015
EU 1
PPD 1
13.07
2015
EU 2
KEYNOTE
LECTURE
Liliana Miranda
14.07
2015
IHT 1
GROUP FIELDWORK
(WPI 1)
15.07
2015
IHT 2
GROUP FIELDWORK
(WPI 1)
16.07
2015
EU 2 Intro
IHT Intro
GROUP FIELDWORK
(WPI 1)
20.07
2015
PPD 3
GROUP FIELDWORK
(WPI 1)
21.07
2015
DESIGNING ALTERNATIVES
(WPI 3)
22.07
2015
DESIGNING ALTERNATIVES
(WPI 3)
23.07
2015
DESIGNING ALTERNATIVES
(WPI 3)
25.07
2015
KEYNOTE
LECTURE
Kelly Shannon
KEYNOTE
LECTURE Peter Ward |
Edith Jimenez
DESIGNING ALTERNATIVES
(WPI 3)
19.07
2015
24.07
2015
PPD Intro
DESIGNING ALTERNATIVES
(WPI 3)
17.07
2015
18.07
2015
EU 1 Intro
KEYNOTE
LECTURE Miguel
Robles-Duran
have
been
made
to
implement
this
Agenda
21.
The
search
for
realistic,
implementable
and
attainable
sustainable
development
policies
continues
and
should
also
lead
to
improved
human
settlements
planning.
The
various
lectures
set
first
a
framework
by
discussing
key
elements
from
the
last
40
years
and
related
institutional
frameworks.
These
elements
are
checked
vis--vis
their
implementation
in
various
contexts
with
a
particular
focus
on
the
Latin
American
region,
taking
into
the
account
the
on-going
development
of
Sustainable
Development
Goals
(SDGs),
which
will
build
upon
the
Millennium
Development
Goals
and
converge
with
the
post
2015
development
agenda.
The
course
will
conclude
by
reviewing
ecological
mega-projects
as
a
new
trend
and
reflecting
on
their
position
vis--vis
the
debate
shaping
the
forthcoming
SDGs
and
post-2015
agenda.
PPD
2:
Co-productive
envisioning
and
mapping
Mapmaking
and
the
discipline
of
ecological
urbanism
have
the
capacity
to
bring
together
experts
and
stakeholders
in
innovative
metropolitan
development.
This
sub-WP
will
focus
on
the
ways
to
produce
strategic
visions
and
scenarios
for
the
context
of
operation
in
order
to
test
options
and
discuss
them
with
the
multiplicity
of
stakeholders
interacting
on
the
urban
arena.
Bearing
in
mind
that
mapping
is
not
a
neutral
activity,
this
sub-
WP
will
provide
a
vast
array
of
examples
to
discuss
inclusive
production
of
cartographies
supporting
the
debate
on
alternative
development
scenarios
for
Guayaquil.
Rather
than
relying
on
Participatory
Rapid
Appraisal
or
Community
Action
Planning,
this
PPD
2
innovatively
promotes
co-productive
vision
and
scenario
building,
following
further
on
the
methodology
developed
during
the
Localizing
LA21
project
the
co-promoter
of
the
project
has
been
involved
in.
PPD
3:
Voicing
the
vulnerable
Enumeration
and
other
community-based
tools
are
increasingly
used
as
a
device
to
represent
the
voice
of
neglected
city-makers.
Lectures
composing
this
sub-WP
will
provide
an
overview
of
such
practices
and
their
outcomes
with
regard
to
threats
such
as
eviction,
climate
change,
and
environmental
degradation
(including
lack
of
health
and
sanitation).
Lecturers
will
also
present
a
conceptual
framework
allowing
STI
participants
to
acknowledge
and
distinguish
between
various
approaches
used
to
work
with
the
urban
poor
(e.g.
Sustainable
Livelihoods
Framework
(SLF);
the
DFID
Resilience
Framework;
the
Rights-Based
Approach
(RBA);
and
the
Capability
Approach
(CA)).
It
will
delve
deeper
into
the
physicality
and
material
manifestation
of
spatial
appropriation,
considering
it
as
a
significant
expression
of
city-making.
Documenting
these
processes
will
be
presented
to
the
STI
trainees
as
a
key
resource
for
voicing
the
vulnerable
who
have
made
their
needs
manifest
by
defying
norms
and
claiming
their
space
in
the
city.
WORK
PACKAGE
3:
INCLUSIVE
HOUSING
TRANSFORMATIONS
(IHT)
IHT
1:
Self-help
housing
and
the
right
to
the
city
This
set
of
training
outputs
concentrates
on
a
rights-based
approach
to
the
city
and
to
living
in
a
dignified
shelter
(vivienda
digna).
A
history
of
self-build
neighborhoods
and
their
crucial
role
in
the
formation
of
Latin
American
cities
will
be
provided,
a
genealogy
that
echoes
that
of
many
other
settlements
of
the
global
South.
The
lectures
will
point
out
that
many
current
regulations
ignore
(when
they
do
not
penalize)
struggles
by
individuals
and
collectives
to
achieve
a
decent
living
quarter.
With
the
scarce
support
from
governments
and
other
actors,
many
self-build
initiatives
have
been
able
to
produce
between
one
half
and
three-quarters
of
the
available
living
space
in
the
city.
As
has
been
recently
outlined,
the
right
to
the
city
(and
to
a
house)
can
be
envisaged
as
a
multi-
stakeholder
framework
facilitating
the
development
of
a
comprehensive
approach
to
the
human
settlements
agenda
currently
under
definition
as
part
of
the
on-going
post-2015
negotiations.
This
opportunity
will
be
presented
in
conclusion
to
the
main
training
outputs
in
this
sub-WP.
IHT
2:
Home
Space
Home
space
has
been
developed
by
scholarship
as
a
critical
and
multi-disciplinary
tool
to
describe
city-making
practices
by
the
urban
majority
that
frequently
fall
under
the
term
of
informal.
In
joining
the
viewpoints
of
architects
and
anthropologists,
it
encourages
the
interpretation
of
self-build
as
both
a
spatial
and
a
social
construction.
In
doing
so,
it
accommodates
the
documentation
of
both
formal
and
informal
processes
of
urbanization,
and
underlining
the
importance
of
both
as
constituents
of
cities
across
the
globe.
The
concept
is
premised
on
the
idea
that
while
formal
urban
making
begins
by
acknowledging
the
large-scale
components
of
the
urban
fabric
such
as
infrastructure),
in
the
informal
city
a
reversal
is
necessary,
and
the
city
can
be
read
from
the
home
outwards.
Indeed,
in
most
self-organized
spaces
neighborhoods
have
been
formed
with
individual
houses
as
their
starting
point,
subsequently
gaining
access
to
urban
services
and
amenities.
This
significant
conceptual
reversal
will
support
STI
participants
in
the
creation
of
a
platform
for
multi-stakeholder
engagement.
WORK
PACKAGE
INTEGRATION
(WPI)
WPI
1:
On-site
fieldwork
For
an
action-learning
initiative
such
as
the
STI,
on-site
fieldwork
is
more
than
the
direct
application
of
methods
learnt
through
the
initial
work
packages
(Ecological
Urbanism,
Participatory
Design
and
Development,
Inclusive
Housing
Transformations),
but
is
part
and
parcel
of
the
knowledge
acquisition
process.
Fieldwork
days
occupy
almost
a
third
of
the
STI
for
this
reason.
Divided
into
multi-disciplinary
teams,
STI
participants
are
expected
to
apply
the
methods
learnt
in
the
first
days,
combining
them
on
the
ground
with
their
own
skills.
The
case
study
areas
selected
for
fieldwork
are
specifically
relevant
to
the
conditions
of
criticality
in
which
a
development
professional
often
finds
his/herself.
WPI
2:
Stakeholder
workshop
Sectorial
thinking
and
lack
of
participation
are
common
obstacles
to
the
development
of
integrated
strategies
for
the
implementation
of
cities
ecological
infrastructure
and
inclusive
housing
transformations.
For
this
reason
the
STI
expects
to
construct
an
ideal
setting
for
these
hindrances
to
be
downplayed
by
means
of
developing
multi-
stakeholder
workshops.
These
events
will
benefit
from
the
momentum
generated
by
the
STI
itself,
and
will
therefore
count
on
the
participation
of
a
vast
array
of
urban
users.
From
vulnerable
communities
whose
livelihoods
will
mostly
be
transformed
by
the
implementation
of
ecological
mega-projects
to
the
experts
called
in
to
consult
on
the
development
of
Guayaquil
Ecologico,
the
workshops
expect
to
provide
ground
for
all
participants
to
express
their
viewpoints
and
prioritize
their
needs.
The
organization
of
WPI
2
is
based
on
the
statement
that
a
major
shift
in
participatory
methods
takes
place
when
moving
from
working
with
communities
to
engaging
with
stakeholders.
WPI
2:
Integrated
design
charette
Intensive
design
charettes
are
acknowledged
for
their
capacity
to
bring
together
participants
of
varying
backgrounds
and,
in
the
space
of
a
restricted
amount
of
working
days
while
facing
a
complex
brief,
generate
a
co-produced
project.
Its
recognized
value
(both
generally
and
by
the
STI
organizers)
is
translated
into
its
position
within
the
training
as
a
component
taking
over
almost
a
third
of
the
available
days.
Results
are
expected
to
culminate
in
a
final
multi-stakeholder
workshop
where
priorities
can
be
defined
and
further
steps
towards
co-
producing
Guayaquil
can
be
agreed
upon
without
renouncing
on
either
the
provision
of
an
ecological
structure,
nor
the
provision
of
decent
housing
for
its
urban
dwellers.