Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Mathematics Department
San Francisco State University
1
2
1.1.1. Derivation of the Heat Equation. Consider a thin rod, of length L, laterally insulated
with, possibly, an internal source of heat. We want to find a function u(x, t) that governs
the temperature distribution inside the rod.
Let the cross sectional area of the rod be A, the mass density be ρ and the specific heat
(the amount of heat needed to raise the temperature of one gram of substance by one degree)
be c. Then the heat density of the rod is given by ρcu. This means that the total heat energy
Q in a segment a ≤ x ≤ b is
Z b
(1.1) Qtotal = ρcuAdx
a
d b
Z
dQtotal
= ρcuAdx
dt dt a
Z b
du
= ρc Adx
a dt
Z b
(1.2) = ρcut Adx
a
where we’ve used a subscript to indicate we are taking the derivative with respect to time.
Now consider Fourier’s Law, which gives us an expression for the thermal flux ϕ. Since
a functions increases most in the direction of its gradient, and thermal flux is a change in
temperature, ϕ is given by:
(1.3) ϕ = −K0 Ou
where K0 is a constant called thermal conductivity. If we want to find the thermal flux
along a specific direction, we need to tale the dot product of ϕ with the unit vector in that
direction.
PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS 3
In the case of our rod, if we ignore any internal sources of heat, we need to consider two
points at which heat is entering or leaving the system: x = a and x = b. At a, the unit
vector is +î, so we have, for a cross sectional area A, that:
(1.8) ϕxx + λϕ = 0
with a combination of the boundary conditions given by ϕ(0) = 0, ϕx (0) = 0, ϕ(L) = 0 and
ϕx (L) = 0. These boundary conditions are known as homogeneous, because they all equal
zero. The solution to the Rayleigh equation will be very useful is solving the heat equation,
so we’ll spend some time on it.
For a solution to exist, the value of λ must be both real and non-negative, as we shall see.
Let’s start with the differential equation −d2 /dx2 ϕ = λϕ with the appropriate boundary
conditions. Then:
Z L Z L
λ ϕϕ̄dx = (λϕ)ϕ̄dx
0 0
L
d2
Z
= − 2 ϕ ϕ̄dx
0 dx
Z L
= − ϕxx ϕ̄dx
0
Z L
= − [ϕ̄ϕx ]L0 + ϕx ϕx dx after integration by parts
0
Z L
= ϕx ϕx dx due to any of our boundary conditions
0
Z L
= [ϕx ϕ]L0 − ϕϕxx dx after integrating by parts again
0
Z L
= − ϕϕxx dx
0
Z L
= ϕ−ϕxx dx
0
Z L
= ϕλϕdx
0
Z L
= λ̄ϕϕ̄dx
0
Z L Z L
λ ϕϕ̄dx = λ̄ ϕϕ̄dx
0 0
λ = λ̄ because ϕϕ̄ = |ϕ|2 ≥ 0
PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS 5
(1.9) ϕ = c1 + c2 x
r2 erx + λerx = 0
(r2 + λ)erx = 0
r2 + λ = 0
r2 = −λ
√
r = ± λi
√ √
So we have found two solutions: e λix
and e− λix
. We know that any linear combination of
solutions is itself a solution, and since we can express sin x and cos x as linear combinations
of these solutions, the trigonometric functions are themselves solutions.
Furthermore, the Wronskian of these two solutions is never zero, so we can conclude that
every solution of the Rayleigh equation when λ > 0 is of the form
√ √
(1.10) A cos λx + B sin λx
To find the values of A and B, we need to make use of the boundary conditions. Since we
have four sets of boundary conditions, we’ll have four sets of values for the constants.
Case 1: First, let’s consider the case when ϕ(0) = 0 and ϕ(L) = 0. We had found that,
for λ = 0, the solution was given by equation 1.9, so:
ϕ(0) = c1 + c2 · 0 = 0 ⇒ c1 = 0
ϕ(L) = c2 · L = 0 ⇒ c2 = 0
Next we consider the case λ > 0 with the same boundary conditions. From the general
solution, eqn 1.10, we have:
ϕ(0) = 0
A cos 0 + B sin 0 = 0
A·1+B·0 = 0
A = 0
√ √
so now ϕ(x) = B sin λx and we can use the second boundary condition: B sin λL = 0.
√
Since B = 0 would give us a trivial solution (ϕ = 0), we need to require that sin λL = 0.
This means that:
√
λL = nπ for n ∈ N
nπ 2
(1.11) λn =
L
which gives us a set of solutions
nπ
(1.12) ϕn (x) = sin x
L
Case 2: The second set of boundary conditions is ϕx (0) = 0 and ϕx (L) = 0. From
equation 1.9 and the B.C. we get:
ϕx (0) = c2 = 0 ⇒ ϕ(x) = c1
Since any multiple of a solution is itself a solution, we can choose any value for c1 . For
simplicity, we choose 1. Thus, we conclude that in this case λ = 0 is an eigenvalue with a
corresponding eigenfunction ϕ0 = 1.
The case when λ > 0 is left as an exercise. The solution is:
nπ 2
(1.13) λn =
L
nπ
(1.14) ϕn (x) = cos x for n ∈ N
L
Case 3: Our third set of B.C. are ϕ(0) = 0 and ϕx (L) = 0.
The case λ = 0, using equation 1.9 and the B.C., results in
ϕ(0) = c1 + cc · 0 = 0 ⇒ c1 = 0
ϕx (L) = c2 · L = 0 ⇒ c2 = 0
PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS 7
Case 4: The last boundary conditions are given by ϕx (0) = 0 and ϕ(L) = 0. This case is
left as an exercise. For these B.C., λ = 0 is not an eigenvalue and the other values of λ and
ϕ are given by:
2
2n − 1
(1.17) λn = π
2L
2n − 1
(1.18) ϕn (x) = cos πx
2L
1.1.3. Solving the Heat Equation with Homogeneous Boundary Conditions. We are now ready
to solve equation 1.7 when there are no internal sources of heat and the boundary conditions
are homogeneous. That is, we want to solve:
In order to solve this, we will look for special, separable solutions of the form
and take into account the fact that, if un and um are two solutions, then any expression of
the form cm um + cn un , where the c are constants, is also a solution (you can check that it
satisfies the PDE and the BCs).
8 PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
Two find the separable solutions, we start by plugging equation 1.20 into the differential
equation. We find:
and
We can see right away that the solution to equation 1.21 is Gn (t) = e−λn kt and that
equation 1.22 is none other that the Rayleigh equation 1.8, for which we have already found
the solution. In this case, the boundary conditions are like in case 1, so the solutions are
like equation 1.12, with eigenvalues like in equation 1.11. Thus, the elementary solutions for
u(x, t) are:
nπx 2
(1.23) un (x, t) = sin e−k(nπ/L) t
L
Next, we need to fit our solution to the initial condition u(x, 0) = f (x), where f (x) is
some given function. We know that any linear combination of elementary solutions is itself a
solution. Fourier’s idea was that an infinite sum of certain functions (trigonometric functions,
for example) can equal any given function:
∞
X nπx
(1.24) f (x) = Bn sin
n=1
L
where we need to find the values of the Bn . To understand how to do this, let’s think about
vectors first.
If e~1 , e~2 and e~3 form an orthogonal basis of a vector space, we know that we can express
any vector in the space as ~v = B1 e~1 +B2 e~2 +B3 e~3 . To find the value of each of the coefficients,
PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS 9
To show that the trigonometric functions form an orthogonal basis, we need to show that
the inner product of any two of them is zero, unless both functions are the same. Indeed,
Z L nπx nπx Z L nπx
sin sin dx = sin2
0 L L 0 L
Z L
1 2nπx
= 1 − cos dx
0 2 L
Z L
L 2nπx
= − cos dx
2 0 L
L
L L 2nπx
= − sin
2 2nπ L 0
L
=
2
and, for n 6= m,
Z L nπx mπx Z L h
1 nπx mπx nπx mπx i
sin sin dx = cos − − cos + dx
0 L L 0 2 L L L L
1 L
Z
(n − m)πx (n + m)πx
= cos − cos dx
2 0 L L
L
1 L (n − m)πx L (n + m)πx
= sin − sin
2 (n − m)π L (n + m)π L 0
= 0
And we have also found that the norm of the elementary functions is L/2.
10 PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
Thus, continuing with our analogy with the vectors, the value of each Bn is going to be
given by the inner product of f (x) with the corresponding elementary function, divided by
the norm, L/2. Therefore, the solution to the heat equation with homogeneous boundary
conditions and an initial temperature distribution f (x) is,
∞
X nπx −k(nπ/L)2 t
(1.25) u(x, t) = Bn sin e
n=1
L
Example 2: Let f (x) = −13 cos( 32 πx/L) + 7 cos( 29 πx/L). We can see that these have
the same form as the elementary solution, with n = 2 and n = 5 respectively. This means
that we know what the result of the integral in equation 1.27 will be: 0 if n 6= 2 and n 6= 5,
−13L/2 if n = 2 and 7L/2 if n = 5. Thus, the values of the Cn are:
−13 if n = 2
Cn = 7 if n = 5
0 otherwise
2 L (n − 12 )πx
Z
Cn = 400x(1 − x) cos dx
L 0 L
Z 1
(2n − 1)πx
= 2 400x(1 − x) cos dx
0 2
Z 1
(2n − 1)πx
= 800 (x − x2 ) cos dx
0 2
" 2
2 2 (2n − 1)πx 2 (2n − 1)πx
= 800 (x − x ) sin + (1 − 2x) cos
(2n − 1)π 2 (2n − 1)π 2
3 #1
2 (2n − 1)πx
+2 sin
(2n − 1)π 2
0
" 2 3 #
2 2 (2n − 1)π
= 800 +2 sin
(2n − 1)π (2n − 1)π 2
−4 16
Cn = 800 2
+ 3
(−1)n+1
((2n − 1)π) ((2n − 1)π)
12 PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
1.2. Inhomogeneous Boundary Conditions. If the boundary conditions are not all zero
(that is, they are not homogeneous), then we can’t use the solutions to the Rayleigh equation
to solve the heat equation. However, we can make use of the steady state solution to solve
it.
The steady state is the function towards which u(x, t) tends as t → ∞. Thus, we know that
wt = 0. Since w(x) is an instance of u(x, t), it should also satisfy the differential equation,
which, since the time derivative is zero, would be kwxx = 0. The solution is therefore very
simple: w is a linear funtion w(x) = Ax + B.
Next, we can define v(x, t) = u(x, t) − w(x). Since w(x) has the same boundary conditions
as u(x, t), we can see that the boundary conditions of v(x, t) would in fact be homogeneous:
v(0, t) = u(0, t) − w(0) = 0 and v(L, t) = u(L, t) − w(L) = 0. Furthermore, v satisfies the
differential equation:
so we know how to find a solution for v. Finding u would then simply consist of adding v
and w.
1.2.1. Some Worked Examples. Example1: Let’s study this with an example. Let u(0, t) =
−23, u(L, t) = 59 and u(x, 0) = 100. We know that w is of the form Ax + B and we can use
the boundary conditions to find A and B:
82 82
v(x, 0) = u(x, 0) − w(x) = 100 − x + 23 = 123 − x
L L
wx = A ⇒ A = 7
w(L) = 7L + B = 137 ⇒ B = 137 − 7L
w(x) = 7x + (137 − 7L)
In this case, our boundary conditions for v are vx (0, t) = 0 and v(L, t) = 0, so the solution
will be a combination of equation 1.18 with the corresponding time part. The initial condition
is
n=1
2L
2 L (2n − 1)πx
Z
An = (7L − 37 − 7x) cos dx
L 0 2L
148(−1)n 56L
= +
(2n − 1)π (2n − 1)2 π 2
and since u = v + w, our final answer is
∞
148(−1)n
X 56L (2n − 1)πx −k( (2n−1)π )
2
t
u(x, t) = + 2π2
cos e 2L + 7x + (137 − 7L)
n=1
(2n − 1)π (2n − 1) 2L
Example 3: Our boundary conditions are now ux (0) = 13 and ux (L) = 13 and the initial
condition is as before.
To determine w, we can see that A = 13, since wx = A, but there is no way to determine
the value of B. We choose to make B = 0, because, as we’ll see later, the true value of the
steady state solution will show up anyway as a constant term in the solution of v(x, t).
The initial condition for v will be v(x, 0) = u(x, 0) − w(x) = 100 − 13x, so the solution
will be, following equations 1.14 and 1.26:
∞
X nπx −k( nπ
L )
2
t
v(x, t) = A0 + An cos e
n=1
L
Z L
1
A0 = (100 − 13x)dx
L 0
L
= 100 − 13
2
Z L
2 nπx
An = (100 − 13x) cos dx
L 0 L
26L
= (1 − (−1)n )
n2 π 2
Thus, the final answer is
∞
L X 26L n nπx −k( nπ
L )
2
t
u(x, t) = 13x + 100 − 13 + 2 2
(1 − (−1) ) cos e
2 n=1 n π L
1.3. The Heat Equation in a Circular Ring. We now want to solve the same heat
equation, but with periodic boundary conditions. That is, instead of a rod, we now have a
PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS 15
circular ring, of circumference 2L, so that u(−L, t) = u(L, t) and ux (−L, t) = ux (L, t). The
initial condition is a function f (x) such that f (−L) = f (L).
We proceed in the same way as with the rod: we look for separable solutions such that we
end up with two ordinary differential equations:
Gt = −kλG
ϕxx + λϕ = 0
Naturally, the G equation has the same solution as before. The boundary conditions for
the ϕ equation, however, are different from before. Now we have:
u(−L, t) = u(L, t)
ϕ(−L)G(t) = ϕ(L)G(t) where G(t) 6= 0, so
ϕ(−L) = ϕ(L)
Likewise, ϕx (−L) = ϕx (L). Also, we can show by following the same procedure as before,
that we must have λ ≥ 0.
Let’s solve first the λ = 0 case. As we saw before, this implies that ϕ is a linear function
of x. Applying the boundary conditions, we find that:
c1 + c2 (−L) = c1 + c2 · L
−c2 · L = c2 · L
−c2 = c2
c2 = 0
Since c1 can be any constant, we might as well let it be 1. We conclude that λ is an eigenvalue,
with eigenfunction ϕ = 1.
Now we can evaluate the λ > 0 case. We know that any solution of the form of equation
1.10 is a solution of the Rayleigh equation. By evaluating the boundary conditions we can
determine the possible values of λ.
ϕ(−L) = ϕ(L)
√ √ √ √
A cos λ(−L) + B sin λ(−L) = A cos λL + B sin λL
√ √ √ √
A cos λL − B sin λL = A cos λL + B sin λL
√
2B sin λL = 0
16 PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
and
ϕx (−L) = ϕx (L)
√ √ √ √ √ √
λ −A sin λ(−L) + B cos λ(−L) = λ −A sin λL + B cos λL
√ √ √ √
A sin λL + B cos λL = −A sin λL + B cos λL
√
2A sin λL = 0
We can see that the only way to avoid the A = B = 0 solution (which would imply that
here are not eigenvalues greater than zero), is to require that
√ √
sin λL = 0 ⇒ λL = nπ
n=1
L L
where the An and Bn will be determined, as usual, by
Z L
1
(1.30) A0 = f (x)dx
2L −L
1 L
Z
nπx
(1.31) An = f (x) cos dx
L −L L
1 L
Z
nπx
(1.32) Bn = f (x) sin dx
L −L L
Note that in this case we’ve used L rather than L/2 as the norm, since the interval is twice
as long as before (from −L to L rather than from 0 to L). A simple calculation of inner
products will confirm that this is correct.
1.4. Orthogonality and Fourier Series. The previous example is not unique. In fact,
any function f (x) on [−L, L] can be expressed by means of its Fourier series. That is,
∞ h
X nπx nπx i
(1.33) f (x) = A0 + An cos + Bn sin
n=1
L L
where the An and Bn are given by equations 1.30, 1.31 and 1.32.
PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS 17
More precisely, the Fourier series equals the periodic extension of a function. For example,
if f (x) = ex , on [−L, L], then the periodic extension would look like figure 1. We can see
that these extensions normally have jump discontinuities. The Fourier series expression
won’t reproduce these. Instead, if we let f¯(x) be the periodic extension of f (x), we’ll have:
∞ h
X nπx nπx i 1 ¯ +
f (x ) + f¯(x− )
(1.34) A0 + An cos + Bn sin =
n=1
L L 2
Thus, if f¯ is continuos, then f¯(x+ ) = f¯(x) and the Fourier representation is precise, but at
jump discontinuities the Fourier extension takes the value in the middle of the discontinuities.
Furthermore, the expression of equation 1.34 is simpler if f¯ is even or odd, because then
the sine or cosine parts will cancel out, respectively. Thus:
∞
¯
X nπ x
(1.35) fodd = Bn sin
n=1
L
∞
X nπ x
(1.36) f¯even = A0 + An cos
n=1
L
There’s also a second phenomenon, known as the Gibbs phenomenon, which presents
itself at jump discontinuities. The Fourier extension will overshoot or undershoot the actual
function, and it will have ripples that die off as the number of terms in the sum approaches
infinity.
18 PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
2.1. The Vibrating String. In this section, we will study the waves produced in a string
of length L that is clamped down at two ends, such as a guitar string. In such a string, any
small length of it experiences two forces in opposite directions: the pull of the string to the
left of it, and the pull of the string to the right of it, like we can see in figure 2
If we assume the tension is constant throughout the string and the angle θ is small enough,
we can see that the horizontal components of the tension would cancel out, so that each small
length of string would not move horizontally. However, it will move vertically. We can see
that the vertical component of the tension force is given by T sin θ. However, if we consider
θ to be a small enough angle, we can approximate sin θ with tan θ. Thus,
T sin θ ≈ T tan θ
∂u
(2.1) = T
∂x
Newton’s Second Law relates a force, such as the tension, to the mass and acceleration of
an object. In this case, the mass of a small length of string is given by its mass density µ
and its length dx, so that dm = µdx. The acceleration is just the second derivative of the
position with respect to time. In our case, the force in question is the difference between the
tension at x and the tension at x + dx. Thus, combining equation 2.1 with Newton’s Law
we get:
F = ma
∂u ∂u
T − T = dm · a
∂x x+dx ∂x x
∂ 2u
∂u ∂u
T − T = µ dx 2
∂x x+dx ∂x x ∂t
∂u
∂x x+dx
− ∂u
∂x x µ ∂ 2u
=
dx T ∂t2
∂ 2u µ ∂ 2u
=
∂x2 T ∂t2
∂ 2u 2
2 ∂ u
(2.2) = c
∂x2 ∂t2
where we have made use of the definition of a derivative and replaced µ/T with c2 , because
it’s always a positive value (and in fact equivalent to the reciprocal of the wave velocity).
This expression is known as the wave equation.
2.1.1. Solving the Wave Equation. In order to illustrate how to solve it, let’s first define some
boundary and initial conditions. Because we have two second derivatives, we now need four
conditions. We’ll say that the string is clamped at both ends (i.e., u(0, t) = 0 and u(L, t) = 0)
and we will let the initial conditions be some functions of x such that u(x, 0) = f (x) and
ut (x, 0) = g(x).
We will proceed as before: we’ll assume the solution is separable u(x, t) = φ(x)h(t). Then,
using the wave equation 2.2, we get
utt = c2 uxx
φ(x) htt (t) = c2 φxx (x) h(t)
htt φxx
2
=
c h φ
As before, since the left hand side is a function of t only and the right hand side is a function
of x only, the only way they can always be equal is if they are both equal to a constant,
which we will call −λ. Thus, we now have two ordinary differential equations:
(2.3) φxx + λ φ = 0
(2.4) htt + c2 λ h = 0
20 PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
Since our boundary conditions depend on the value of x only, the boundary conditions
for φ(x) are the same. Therefore, equation 2.3 is the well-known Rayleigh equation, and the
solution is give by equation 1.12, with the values of λ given by 1.11.
We now also know that the values of λ are only positive, since they need to satisfy the
Rayleigh equation. This means that equation 2.4 is also a form of the Rayleigh equation,
albeit with other boundary conditions. The solution is very similar to equation 1.29:
cnπ t cnπ t
(2.5) h(t) = A cos + B sin
L L
Thus, the final solution for u(x, t) is given by
∞
X nπc t nπ x nπc t nπ x
(2.6) u(x, t) = An cos sin + Bn sin sin
n=1
L L L L
u(x, 0) = f (x)
∞
X nπ x
(2.7) sin = f (x)
n=1
L
2 L
Z
nπ x
(2.8) ⇒ An = f (x) sin
L 0 L
and
ut (x, 0) = g(x)
∞
X nπc nπ x nπc nπ x
−An sin 0 · sin + Bn cos 0 · sin = g(x)
n=1
L L L L
∞
X nπc nπ x
Bn sin = g(x)
n=1
L L
2 L
Z
nπc nπ x
Bn = g(x) sin dx
L L 0 L
Z L
2 nπ x
(2.9) Bn = g(x) sin dx
nπc 0 L
2.1.2. D’Alembert’s Expression of the Solution. D’Alembert interpreted the solution in a
different way from what we have just seen, and one which is very useful from the physics
point of view, because it gives us a better idea of what is happening to the string at different
times. D’Alembert imagined that we had two solutions , uf and ug , instead of one, one for
each of two sets of initial conditions. The final solution would be u(x, t) = uf + ug .
PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS 21
so that u(x, 0) = uf (x, 0) + ug (x, 0) = f (x) + 0 = f (x), as before, and ut (x, 0) = uft (x, 0) +
ugt (x, 0) = 0 + g(x) = g(x), again as before. We can see that the two solutions, D’Alembert’s
and our previous Fourier derived one, are equivalent. But we will see why D’Alembert’s can
be a lot more convenient at times.
Let’s find an expression for uf and ug in our previous example. The general solution, in
both cases, is the same as equation 2.6, but since the initial conditions are different, the final
solutions are going to be different. In the case of uf , we’ll have:
∞
X nπc nπ x
uft (x, 0) = Bn sin =0
n=1
L L
We can see that this can only be the case if all of the Bn are zero. Thus, we have found an
expression for uf :
∞
f
X nπc t nπ x
u (x, t) = An cos sin
n=1
L L
∞
X 1 nπ x nπc t nπ x nπc t
= An sin + + sin −
n=1
2 L L L L
∞ ∞
1X h nπ i 1X h nπ i
= An sin (x + ct) + An sin (x − ct)
2 n=1 L 2 n=1 L
We can see that each of the terms in the sum in this last equation looks like equation 1.35.
Since in our case u is defined on [0, L] only, we can always make it into an odd function, by
first extending it oddly to [−L, L] and then extending that odd function periodically. So it
makes sense to call each of the terms in the sum the Fourier expression of the odd extension
of f (x). Following our previous notation, we can thus write:
1 1
(2.10) uf (x, t) = f¯odd (x + ct) + f¯odd (x − ct)
2 2
This notation is very nice, because the physical interpretation of it is very straightforward.
The (x + ct) part of it represents a pulse moving to the right (c represents the velocity of
22 PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
the pulse), while the (x − ct) part represents a pulse moving to the left. Thus, we say that
the wave is the sum of a pulse going right and a pulse going left.
Now we need an expression for ug . As before, we know the general solution and can make
use of the initial condition ug (x, 0) = 0
∞
X nπx nπx
ug (x, 0) = An cos 0 · sin + Bn sin 0 sin =0
n=1
L L
∞
X nπx
0 = An sin
n=1
L
which, again, implies that all of the An are zero. Thus, the solution for ug is
∞
X nπ nπc
ug (x, t) = Bn sin x sin t
n=1
L L
∞
X 1 nπ(x − ct) nπ(x + ct)
(2.11) = Bn cos − cos
n=1
2 L L
Now, our other initial condition for ug says that ugt (x, 0) = g(x), so
∞
X nπc nπx
g(x) = Bn sin
n=1
L L
although, to be more correct, we should say that it is the odd periodic extension of g that
equals this, as we’ve seen before. Now consider the following.
x+ct ∞
1 x+ct X nπc
Z Z
1 nπ
ḡodd (s) ds = Bn sin s ds
2c x−ct 2c x−ct n=1 L L
∞
1 x+ct X nπ
Z nπ
= Bn sin s ds
2 x−ct n=1 L L
∞ Z x+ct
1X nπ nπ
= Bn sin s ds
2 n=1 x−ct L L
∞
1X h nπ is=x+ct
= Bn − cos s
2 n=1 L s=x−ct
∞
1X nπ (x + ct) nπ(x − ct)
(2.12) = −Bn cos + Bn cos
2 n=1 L L
PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS 23
If we compare equations 2.11 and 2.12 we can see that the two are equivalent. Thus, we
can write ug as
Z x+ct
g 1
(2.13) u (x, t) = ḡodd (s) ds
2c x−ct
Thus, combining equations 2.10 and 2.13, we arrive at the solution for u:
3. Laplace’s Equation
4. Fourier Transform
4.1. Introduction.