Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ASHRAE Journal
6. Select chillers.
7. Finalize piping system design, calculate pump head, and select pumps.
8. Develop and optimize control sequences.
Each of these steps is discussed in this
series of five articles. This article discusses Step 3: designing the condenser
water distribution system. Steps 2 and 4
will be discussed in the next article.
Three common piping arrangements
for condenser water pumps are:
Option A: Dedicate a pump for each
condenser (Figure 1a);
Option B: Provide a common header
at the pump discharge and two-way automatic isolation valves for each condenser (Figure 1b); and
Option C: Provide a common header with normally closed (NC) manual
isolation valves in the header between
pumps (Figure 1c).
The advantages of dedicated pumps
for each condenser (Option A) include:
About the Author
Steven T. Taylor, P.E., is a principal at Taylor
Engineering in Alameda, Calif.
a s h r a e . o r g
September 2011
Cooling
Tower
No. 1
Cooling
Tower
No. 2
Cooling
Tower
No. 3
C
Cooling
Tower
No. 1
Cooling
Tower
No. 2
Cooling
Tower
No. 3
Cooling
Tower
No. 1
Cooling
Tower
No. 2
Cooling
Tower
No. 3
Chiller No. 1
Chiller No. 1
CHW Pump
No. 1
CHW Pump
No. 1
Chiller No. 3
CHW Pump
No. 2
CHW Pump
No. 2
Chiller No. 1
Chiller No. 2
CHW Pump
No. 3
N.C.
Chiller No. 2
N.C.
Chiller No. 3
CHW Pump
No. 3
Figure 1: Condenser water pump piping options. Option A (left): Dedicated pumps. Option B (center): Headered pumps with condenser auto-isolation valves. Option C (right): Headered pumps with manual isolation valves.
1. The pump can be custom-selected for the condenser it
serves. Pump selection can then account for variations in
condenser pressure drop and flow rates when chillers are not
identical. This can reduce pump energy compared to Option B
where the head of each pump must be the same and sized for
the condenser with the highest pressure drop; balance valves
at the other condensers must be throttled to generate this same
pressure drop.
2. Controls are a bit simpler because the pump can be controlled using the contact provided with the chiller controller.
This ensures that the pump starts and stops when the chiller
wants it to. With Option B, the control of the isolation valves
and pumps is by the direct digital control (DDC) system and
must be coordinated with the needs of the chiller controller to
avoid nuisance trips. For instance, the pumps generally must
run for several minutes after the command for the chiller to stop
so that the chiller can pump down the refrigerant.
3. Pump failures do not cause multiple chiller trips. With
dedicated pumps, if a pump fails, only the chiller it serves will
see a flow disruption and trip. With Option B, all operating
chillers will see a flow reduction when a pump fails, possibly
causing more than one chiller to trip due to low flow or high
refrigerant head. However if there is a lag or standby pump
with Option B that can be started quickly, trips can usually be
avoided because it takes some time for refrigerant head to rise.
The advantages of headered (manifolded) pumps (Option
B) include:
1. Redundancy is improved. With Option A, if a pump fails
and a chiller other than the one it serves also fails (albeit a
rare event), then two chillers will be inoperative. With Option
B, any pump can serve any chiller and under many conditions
one pump can provide enough flow for two chillers to operate
near full capacity.
September 2011
27
B
Cooling
Tower
No. 1
Cooling
Tower
No. 2
Cooling
Tower
No. 3
C
Cooling
Tower
No. 1
Cooling
Tower
No. 2
Cooling
Tower
No. 3
Cooling
Tower
No. 1
Cooling
Tower
No. 2
Cooling
Tower
No. 3
Figure 2: Cooling tower cell isolation options. Option A (left): Weir dams and/or low flow nozzles. Option B (center): Autoisolation valves on supply only. Option C (right): Auto-isolation valves on supply and suction.
for most screw chillers and some hermetic centrifugal chillers, and very low for magnetic bearing chillers, which have no
oil return considerations. There are two common reasons why
low refrigerant head pressure can occur:
At start-up when water temperature in the cooling tower
basins is cold. Some chillers can operate for a short period of
time with low start-up head while others will trip on low head
pressure safeties almost immediately. To determine if head
pressure control is required, for cold starts, consult with the
chiller manufacturer.
When integrated waterside economizers are used (discussed later). Head pressure control is almost always mandatory since cooling tower water temperatures are deliberately
kept very cold for long periods.
Options to avoid low head pressure problem include:
Tower three-way bypass valves. The bypass water is diverted around the tower fill into the cooling tower sump or
into the suction piping, thus avoiding natural cooling that occurs across the tower fill even when tower fans are off. Piping
the bypass to the suction line also avoids the mass of water
in the basin for an even faster warm-up, but the design can
be problematic: unless the bypass line is balanced to create a
pressure drop equal to the height of the cooling tower, air will
be drawn into the system backwards from the spray nozzles
since piping above the basin will fall below atmospheric pressure. For staged or variable condenser water flow systems, the
bypass must be balanced at the lowest expected flow rate. This
creates a high pressure drop and reduced flow if more pumps
operate, but reduced flow is acceptable when the intent of the
bypass is to raise head pressure. The bypass valve is controlled
by supply water temperature typically with a low limit setpoint
well below the normal setpoint used to control tower fan on/
off and speed. Tower bypass is most commonly used where
towers must operate in very cold weather to avoid freezing
in the fill. The following two options are less expensive and,
therefore, preferred in other applications.
For systems with dedicated condenser water pumps (Option A or C, Figure 1), variable speed drives on the pumps can
be used to reduce water flow to the chiller. Head pressure can
be maintained even with very cold supply water as long as
the flow rate can be reduced so that the condenser refrigerant
pressure can be high enough (head pressure depends on the
28
ASHRAE Journal
September 2011
tower cells, this can eliminate the need for isolation valves,
which cost much more than the weir dams and nozzles. This
option is also the most efficient; tower energy use is minimized by operating as many cells as possible, particularly
when tower fans are controlled by variable speed drives.
This is because fan speed is reduced (reducing fan power
by almost the cube of the speed) and cooling is achieved
through tower cells even when fans are off. With most manufacturers and tower types, nozzles and dams are available
to reduce flow by 50%, and many can go down to 33% or
even 25% depending on the selection and design flow rate.
Because of low cost and high efficiency, this option should
always be the first choice. When a plant has many tower
cells and automatic isolation valves are unavoidable, the
dams and nozzles should still be selected to allow as many
cells to operate as possible.
Option B: Install automatic isolation valves on supply
lines only. This option uses the equalizer to keep basin levels
between overflow and fill lines and will require that equalizers be oversized from that required by normal duty. For
example, assume there are three tower cells, and only one
is active; supply flow to the others is shut off. But water is
drawn out of all three cell basins since the suction lines have
no automatic isolation valves. The water level in the basin
of the cell that is supplied will rise while the other two basin levels will fall. The difference in the two elevations must
provide enough head for water to transfer from the supplied
cell to the others through the equalizer. If the equalizer is
undersized, water will overflow in the supplied cell, and the
others will be drawn so low that makeup water valves open,
wasting water and water treatment chemicals. There are only
a few inches of elevation difference between the overflow
and fill lines, so it is imperative that the equalizer be properly
sized for this option to work. Another approach is to eliminate the basins at each tower and use a common sump, often
located indoors in cold climates. This avoids the need for
equalizer lines entirely but is much more expensive.
Option C: Install automatic isolation valves on both supply and suction lines. This is usually the most expensive
option since automatic valves are expensive relative to an
incremental increase in equalizer size. This design also increases exposure to a valve failure; an oversized equalizer
line has no failure modes. It also increases the risk of freezing (or increases the energy used by basin heaters) in the
basins of inactive cells in systems that must operate in cold
weather. But this is often the best option when there are
many tower cells that are not located close together (long
equalizer lines).
www.info.hotims.com/37990-52
September 2011
ASHRAE Journal
29
Cooling
Tower
No. 1
Cooling
Tower
No. 1
Cooling
Tower
No. 2
Cooling
Tower
No. 2
Chiller No. 1
Chiller No. 1
Chiller No. 2
Chiller No. 2
Either Pump
Or Valve
(Not Both)
ASHRAE Journal
Cooling
Tower
No. 1
Cooling
Tower
No. 2
Chiller No. 1
Chiller No. 2
September 2011
VSD
VSD
Cooling
Tower No. 1
Cooling
Tower No. 2
VSD
Chiller No. 1
VSD
VSD
VSD
Chiller No. 2
VSD
VSD
www.info.hotims.com/37990-13
32
With the ever-increasing drive to improve plant efficiency, there is more interest in all-variable speed chilled
water plants,3 which refers to plants with variable speed
drives on all components, including condenser water
pumps (Figure 6). It is common to find variable speed
drives on cooling towers and chilled water pumps and, in
fact, they are required with few exceptions by energy standards such as Standard 90.1. Using variable speed drives on
A S H R A E J o u r n a l
September 2011
ASHRAE Journal
a s h r a e . o r g
September 2011
www.info.hotims.com/37990-17
36
A S H R A E J o u r n a l
September 2011