Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
157
Case 1:04-cv-06018 Document 157 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 1 of 5
GEORGE S. MAY )
INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, )
)
Plaintiff, )
) Case Number 04-C-6018
-vs- )
) Judge Norgle
XCENTRIC VENTURES, LLC, )
RIP-OFF REPORT.COM ) Magistrate Judge Mason
BADBUSINESSBUREAU.COM, )
ED MAGEDSON, VARIOUS )
JOHN DOES, JANE DOES AND )
ABC COMPANIES, )
)
Defendants. )
moves for an extension of time to complete discovery. Defendants, by their counsel, have
indicated that they are in agreement with this motion and the corresponding dates requested with
signed by the Court on May 24, 2006 and entered on May 30, 2006. See Order, attached as
Exhibit A. Since the entry of that order, both parties have exchanged written discovery and
2. Disputes have arisen during the course of written discovery which the parties have
attempted in good faith to resolve. In fact, the parties have exchanged letters and have had
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 1:04-cv-06018 Document 157 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 2 of 5
telephone conferences, the parties exchanged drafts of proposed protective orders, and submitted
an agreed protective order to the Court for approval. Some documents have been withheld
because no protective order is in place, and the parties anticipate that once the protective order is
entered by the Court, the parties will supplement some document production. Moreover, this
Court has given leave to Plaintiff to reissue its subpoena to PayPal, Inc., and Defendants agreed
to withdraw their motion to quash a subpoena directed Creative Business Investment Concepts,
4. While Plaintiff anticipates that the entry of a protective order will resolve some of
the disputes relating to document discovery, it is anticipated that there will be some practice with
respect to motions to compel to resolve outstanding disputes. Once the protective order is
entered, the parties are going to continue to work to resolve document discovery issues prior to
filing motions to compel. Since the parties need to resolve the document discovery issues and
issues that may need to be raised in motions to compel, the parties have not taken oral discovery
depositions.
5. The parties are also scheduled to appear before the Court on September 20, 2006
to set a date for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of the contempt sanction, to discuss dates and
counsel and Defendants’ counsel have discussed obtaining an extension of the discovery
deadlines in this case. Defendants’ counsel contacted Plaintiff’s counsel via telephone on the
afternoon of Friday, September 15, 2006, and indicated that she was in agreement with this
motion for an extension of time to complete discovery and the dates requested.
2
Case 1:04-cv-06018 Document 157 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 3 of 5
respectfully requests that this Court grant an extension of the discovery deadlines. The extension
of the discovery deadlines is not being sought for an improper purpose nor to affect undue delay,
and the parties have made good faith efforts to resolve discovery disputes and formulate an
agreed protective order to facilitate discovery. Additionally, since the Court indicated it will
hold an evidentiary hearing while discovery on the merits of this case is proceeding, an extension
is warranted.
additional ninety days to take fact discovery, up to and including January 11, 2007. Plaintiff,
with the agreement of Defendants, also requests that the corresponding deadline for disclosure of
experts and retained expert reports be extended up to and including February 12, 2007, and the
deadline for expert discovery to be completed extended up to and including March 14, 2007.
that this Court grant this Agreed Motion for an Extension of Time to Complete Discovery,
allowing an additional ninety days to complete fact discovery, up to and including January 11,
2007; allowing the deadline for disclosure of experts and retained expert reports to be extended
up to and including February 12, 2007, and allowing the deadline for expert discovery to be
3
Case 1:04-cv-06018 Document 157 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 4 of 5
4
Case 1:04-cv-06018 Document 157 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 5 of 5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on September 15, 2006, I electronically filed the Agreed Motion for
an Extension of Time to Complete Discovery with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF
James K. Borcia
David O. Yuen
Tressler, Soderstrom, Maloney & Priess
233 South Wacker Drive, 22nd Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60606-6308
s/ Rachel M. Kindstrand
CH1 11113122.1