Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Summary
One primary goal of any enhanced recovery project is to
maximize the ability of the fluids to flow through a porous
medium (Le., the reservoir). This paper discusses the
effect of capillary number, a dimensionless group describing the ratio of viscous to capillary forces, on twophase (oil-water) relative permeability curves. Specifically, a series of steady-state relative permeability measurements were carried out to determine whether the capillary
number causes changes in the two-phase permeabilities
or whether one of its constituents, such as flow velocity,
fluid viscosity, or interfacial tension (1FT), is the controlling variable.
For the core tests, run in fired Berea sandstone, a Soltrol
170 oil/calcium chloride (CaCI 2) brine/isopropyl
alcohol (IPA)/glycerin system was used. Alcohol was the
1FT reducer and glycerin was the wetting-phase
viscosifier.
The nonwetting-phase (oil) relative permeability showed
little correlation with the capillary number. As 1FT
decreased below 5.50 dyne/cm [5.50 N/m], the oil
permeability increased dramatically. Conversely, as the
water viscosity increased, the oil demonstrated less ability
to flow. For the wetting-phase (water) relative permeability, the opposite capillary number effect was shown.
For both the tension decrease and the viscosity increase
(i.e., a capillary number increase) the water permeability
increased. However, the water increase was not as great
as the increase in the oil curves with an 1FT decrease.
No velocity effects were noted within the range studied.
Other properties relating to relative permeabilities were
also investigated. Both the residual oil saturation (ROS)
and the imbibition-drainage hysteresis were found to
decrease with an increase in the capillary number. The
irreducible water saturation was a function of 1FT tension only.
A relative permeability model was developed from the
experimental data, based on fluid saturations, 1FT, fluid
viscosities, and the residual saturations, by using regression analysis. Both phases were modeled for both the imbibition and the drainage processes. These models
demonstrated similar or better fits with experimental data
of other water- and oil-wet systems, when compared with
existing relative permeability models. The applicability
of these regression models was tested with the aid of a
two-phase reservoir simulator.
Copyright 1985 SOCiety of Petroleum Engineers
FEBRUARY 1985
Introduction
As world oil reserves dwindle, the need to develop EOR
techniques to maximize recovery is of great importance.
Methods such as chemical flooding, miscible flooding,
and thermal recovery involve altering the mobility and/or
the 1FT between the displacing and the displaced fluids.
Recovery efficiency was found to be dependent on the
capillary number, defined as
p.v
Nc ='Yep
................................ (1)
1.0 I-~~~S{-
-'""-----....... ,
'C
'%\.,-
\&
'i
\~.
'"~
'"
\9"
\1:9
\~
0.5
\:>
,,
f;::
- - - Nonwetting Residual
- - - Wetting Residual
"
O~~L-~~~---L~~--~~~--~~~
10 0
10.8
Capillory Number, Nc
Length
Run
Core
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1*
2*
3**
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
7
8
9
10*
11*
12*
~
24
12
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
12
24
24
24
24
24
PV
(cm) 3
276
148
240
280
280
280
280
280
280
280
287
287
287
287
287
279
279
279
279
146
330
276
249
235
272
Porosity
(%)
22.46
23.96
19.42
22.48
22.48
22.48
22.48
22.48
22.48
22.48
23.05
23.05
23.05
23.05
23.05
22.40
22.40
22.40
22.40
23.48
26.50
22.16
20.15
19.02
22.01
Permeability
(Prerun)
(md)
Permeability
(Post-run)
(md)
241.3
198.1
240.6
325.3
278.4
247.8
251.0
219.7
219.7
123.2
365.9
408.2
355.3
353.4
311.1
433.1
433.1
416.4
384.5
531.6
388.1
357.7
177.3
279.1
160.2
115.1
136.0
115.1
278.4
247.8
251.0
219.7
219.7
182.1
128.3
408.2
355.3
353.4
311.1
259.3
433.1
416.4
384.5
(%)
-52.3
-31.3
-52.2
-14.4
-11.0
+ 1.3
-12.5
+0.0
-17.1
+4.1
+ 11.6
-13.0
-0.5
-12.0
-16.7
+0.0
-3.9
-7.7
398.5
+2.7
Change
Unfired core .
250
Runs
1-7,9,
13,21,22
8
10,11
12,16
14
15
17
18
19
20
23,24
25
1-7,9,
12,21,22
8
10,11
12,16
14
15
Phase
aqueous
aqueous
aqueous
aqueous
aqueous
aqueous
aqueous
aqueous
aqueous
aqueous
aqueous
aqueous
oleic
oleic
oleic
oleic
oleic
oleic
oleic
oleic
oleic
oleic
oleic
oleic
17
18
19
20
23,24
25
2% CaCI 2
Brine
(%)
100.0
60.0
10.9
3.9
40.0
17.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0'
100.0'
0.0
0.2
0.9
1.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
JPA
(%)
Glycerin
(%)
Specific
Gravity
at 25C
0.0
0.0
14.0
43.5
0.0
0.0
9.6
0.1
20.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
40.0
75.1
52.6
0.0
0.0
63.5
38.3
62.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
60.0
82.5
27.9
61.6
16.6
100.0
0.0
0.0
1.007
0.917
0.804
0.785
1.156
1.212
0.914
1.069
0.853
1.258
1.009
1.009
0.947
2.761
2.613
2.475
13.795
128.58
13.636
126.62
6.100
954.00
0.892
0.892
1.3385
1.3664
1.3879
1.3996
1.4231
1.4516
1.4115
1.4418
1.4050
1.4735
1.3356
1.3356
37.9
5.50
0.335
0.0389
30.3
29.7
0.454
2.91
0.118
25.3
24.5
10.8
0.0
4.5
15.9
27.4
0.0
0.0
22.4
10.0
30.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
0.3
2.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.781
0.771
0.774
0.775
0.781
0.781
0.785
0.781
0.791
0.781
0.814
0.845
2.363
2.246
2.309
2.352
2.363
2.363
2.149
2.029
2.173
2.363
5.195
11.297
1.4339
1.4348
1.4277
1.4196
1.4339
1.4339
1.4207
1.4264
1.4168
1.4335
1.4504
1.4711
37.9
5.50
0.335
0.0389
30.3
29.7
0.454
2.91
0.118
25.3
24.5
10.8
100.0
95.3
83.2
71.5
100.0
100.0
76.1
89.7
67.0
100.0
100.0"
100.0"
Viscosity
at 25C
(cp)
Refractive
Index
at 25C
1FT with
Oleic/Aqueous
at 25 C
(dyne/cm)
Soltrol170
Oil
(%)
2% NaCI brine.
"Bradford crude oil.
tKendex 0837 oil.
vocuumt:J
I
I
1
I
Core
Fluid
Reservoirs
r-
Pump
__ J
Sample
Collector
Ruska
Pump
Manometer
Fluid
Reservoir
FEBRUARY 1985
251
tPA
tPA
2% CaCI 2 Brine
Soh,ol 170 OH
Glyce,in
Fig. 3-Equilibrium phase diagrams for Soltrol 170/lPN20f0 CaCI 2 and Soltrol 170llPNglycerin
systems.
Run
System
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
SCA
SC
SCA
SCA
SCA
SC
SCG
SCG
SCA
SGA
SGA
SGA
SC
SC
SC
BN
BN*
KN
Flow
Rate
(cm 3 )
160
160
200
200
80
120
160
200
400
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
1FT
(dyne/cm)
3.79 x 10 1
3.79 x 10 1
3.79 x 10 1
3.79 x 10 1
3.79x 10 1
3.79 x 10 1
3.79 x 10 1
5.50x 10
3.79x 10 1
3.35 x 10- 1
3.35 x 10- 1
3.89x10- 2
3.79x101
3.03x10 1
2.97 x 10 1
3.89 x 10- 2
4.54x 10- 1
2.91 x 10
1.18x 10- 1
2.59 x 10 1
3.79 x 10 1
3.79 x 10 1
2.45 x 10 1
2.45 x 10 1
1.08x 10 1
Wetting Phase
Viscosity
(cp)
0.947
0.947
0.947
0.947
0.947
0.947
0.947
2.761
0.947
2.613
2.613
2.475
0.947
13.795
128.58
2.475
13.636
126.62
6.100
954.00
0.947
0.947
0.892
5.195
0.892
Capillary
Number
2.47x10- 6
2.34x10- 6
3.61 x 10- 6
3.09x10- 6
1.24x10- 6
1.86x10- 6
2.48 x 10- 6
6.22x 10- 5
6.18x10- 6
9.66x10- 4
9.43x10- 4
7.65x10- 3
3.02 x 10- 6
5.50 x 10- 5
5.23 x 10- 4
7.92 x 10- 3
3.74x10- 3
5.41x10- 3
6.43x10- 3
4.37x10- 3
2.62x 10- 6
3.14x10- 6
4.41x10- 6
3.13x10- 5
1.06x10- 5
So,
Sw;,
(Ofo)
(Ofo)
Microscopic
Displacement
Efficiency (Ofo)
40.4
43.5
48.9
36.3
35.1
42.3
44.1
33.1
42.8
0.0
8.9
0.1
36.8
38.6
17.1
0.0
2.2
30.6
3.9
10.3
30.1
20.9
37.9
39.4
33.1
38.2
34.3
25.5
22.1
31.7
29.9
26.6
39.4
34.8
56.3
41.5
33.6
33.0
37.0
32.9
32.0
40.2
33.9
30.1
36.2
40.1
38.5
30.8
19.7
33.0
34.7
33.8
34.4
53.4
48.6
39.7
39.9
45.4
34.4
100.0
84.8
99.0
45.1
38.7
74.5
100.0
96.3
53.7
94.4
83.8
49.8
66.0
46.4
51.0
50.6
OilWet System.
System Notes:
S Soltrol 170 oil.
B - Bradford crude oil.
K - Kendex 0837 oil.
C - 2% (by weight) CaCI 2 brine.
N - 2% (by weight) NaCI brine.
A - Isopropyl alcohol.
G - Glycerin.
Glycerin mixed completely with the brine and was immiscible with the oil in all proportions. Combined effects
of interfacial tension and viscosity were studied by using
a Soltrol/lPA/glycerin fluid system.
The experimental apparatus is shown in Fig. 2. The
cores were prepared using the Lapp Pulsafeeder
pump. Relative permeability tests required two Ruska
constant-displacement pumps, one for each fluid phase.
All fluids were flowed through a O.4-micron [O.4-/-tm]
252
Y = 37.9 diem
= 40 ft,day
P-w = 0.9468 ep
Ne = 3.09 x 10- 6
kro
= 37.9 diem
= 40 ft/day
P-w = 0.9468 ep
Ne = 3.02 x 10- 6
Run 4
Run 13
--Drainage
Drainage
- - --Imbibition
- - - - Imbibition
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
k rw
k ro
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
108.0
0.0
0.0
10 20
30 40 50
60
70
90
80
20 30
10
40
Sw (%)
50 60
70 80
k rw
90
Sw (%)
Fig. 4-Oil-water relative permeabilities for the base system and reproducibility of measurements.
= 5.50 diem
= 40 It/dey
Run 8
--Drainage
"w = 2.7606 ep
- - - -Imbibition
y
y
Discussion of Results
A summary of the experimental core tests is shown in
Table 3. Two control tests were run (Fig. 4) to measure
the reproducibility of the procedure, test the viability of
using fired Berea cores, and establish a comparative base
for the altered fluid runs. Soltrol 170 and 2 % CaCl 2
brine were flowed at a total fluid flow rate of 200 mLlhr
Run II
Y = 0.03885 diem
Run 16
= 40 It/dey
--Drainage
., :;: 40 h/doy
- - Drainage
"w = 2.6126ep
- - - -Imbibition
- - - -Imbibition
Y = 0.3346 diem
y
He = 6.22 x 10- 5
Kyte and Rapoport,20 a 50-psi [345-kPa] pressure differential across the core, was required. Thus, an SO-mLlhr
[SO-cm 3 /h] minimum flow rate at a velocity of 16 fi/D
[4.9 mId] was needed for fluids of high 1FT (greater than
1.0 dyne/cm [1.0 N/m]), and 200 mLlhr [200 cm 3 Ih] at
40 fi/D [12.2 mId] was needed for low-tension (less than
1.0 dyne/cm [1.0 N/m]) systems. 21
He
He = 7.92 x 10- 3
= 9.43 x 10-4
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.7
k,e
k,e
0.0 0
10 20
30
40 50 60 70
Sw (%)
80
k rw kro
k,w
0.1
0.0
0
10
20 30
40
50 60 70
Sw (%)
80 90
0.0
253
1. 0 rr---r--r.,-,-rncn--.----,-,--TTlTTr-,-TOOTnnr-----r-,---T"T1
0.9
--Droinoge
- - -Imbibition
0.8
= 200 cc/hr-
0.7
0.6
"'w '" 2 cp
kro 0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
.
10 2
10. 1
Interfacial Tension (diem)
1.0
0.9
--Drainage
- - -Imbibition
0.8
0.7
Q = 200 cc/hr
0.6
'" w",2
cp
kro 0.5
0.4
"0-_---
0.3
0.2
0.0 10. 2
Interfacial Tension (d 'em)
y 0 lO.l diem
v 0 40 Itlday
"'w 0 13.795 ep
Ne 0 5.50 x 10.5
kro
0 29.7 diem
v = 40 It/day
"'w = 128.58 ep
Ne 0 5.2l x 10'4
Run 14
--D,oinag~
- - - -Imbibition
Y = 25.9 diem
v 0 40 Itlday
"'w 0 954.0ep
Ne 0 4.37 x 10 l
Run 15
--Drainage
- - - -Imbibition
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
krw k,o
k,w kro
Run 20
_ _ Drainage
- _ - - Imbibition
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
O.l
O.l
O.l
O.l
0.3
O.l
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0
10 20
lO 40
50 60
Sw (%)
10
20 lO
Sw (%)
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
100
10
20
lO
krw
Sw (%)
Y = 0.1180 diem
= 40 Itlday
U w =6.100 ep
Ne = 6.43 x 10,3
v
kro
--Drainage
= 0.4539 diem
. . = 40 h/doy
- - --Imbibition
Uw
Run ]9
Ne
= 13.6361 ep
= 3.74 x 10,3
0.6
O.S
--Drainage
- - -Imbibition
0.4
kro 0.3
0.2
s,.=
0.1
Sw-
------1w=6""
0.0
100
'VisCOlil, (cp)
0.5
= 200 cc/hr
y .. 30 d/cm
0.
- - Drainage Imbibition
- - - Imbibition
0.3
0.2
0.1
Viscosit, (cp)
Y = 2.91 diem
v = 40 Itlday
U w = 126.62 ep
Ne = 5.41 x 10,3
Run 17
--Drainage
- - - - Imbibition
Run 18
--Drainage
- - - - Imbibition
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
kro
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
100
0.0
0.00
10
20
30
40
50 60
Sw (%)
70 80
90
krw kro
krw
0.6
O
0
10 20
30
40
50 60
Sw (%)
70
80
90
0.00
10
20
30
40
50 60
Sw (%)
70
80 90
lr:
255
.~
10- 2
1.0
o-Ok,.IQ)
0.9
[',-<>k,.IY)
O.B
o--ok ro (j4.)
+ - t kro(comb.)
1 0.7
E
~ 0.6
0.5
~ 0.4
6 0.3
0.2
0
0.1
. .J
00
10-3
"------- o +
6
4i
Capillary Number
"I
'I
0.5
..0
'I
'I
o-okrw(Q)
>-
6-!;,k rw (Y)
0.4
o-Ok rw (j4.)
0..
C
+ - t krw(comb.)
1
~
.
'"~
.
.;
D-
5 10-4
+
03
10-5
02
.
o
0.1
0.0
10- 5
10-
10-4
10- 3
10- 2
10~
Fig. 10-lmbibition oil and water relative permeabilities as functions of capillary number at 50% water saturation.
0.0
,
40
.
J
30
__ 0-
---
20
10
<>
0,
0
~_--
f------- ----
- -_ + tJ,.
-~
'+
....................... (3)
----"5.,IY)
----Sor ("d
~--DSwir (JA,)
Capillary Number
..............
(4)
S*
kro(dr)
So
kro(im)
So -
MSER"
Ft
1.2861
0.08043
0
-0.37932
,2(%)*
0.72899
97.2
1020.8
4.04
1.56878
1.33874
0.09187
0.08528
96.2
511.2
4.13
0.70216
1.25579
0.0
-0.074482
97.9
2070.7
4.89
0.61135
1.25875
0.0
-0.070812
98.0
1704.1
4.92
0.70340
0.66596
0.0
-0.071513
97.8
1613.8
4.89
0.61135
0.69580
0.0
- 0.068221
97.4
1659.5
4.92
+ 1.8855 x 10- 3
96.6
122.3
5.74
Sor
; plot;
1-S or
k rw1 (dr)
Sw -Swir
1-S wir
k rw1 (im)
Sw -Sw;r
1-S wir
Sw-Swif
krw2(dr)
1-S w;r
Sw -SWir
K rw2 (im)
1-S wir
Sor
+5.846x10-'
+2.96x 10-'
+4.62x 10- 2
SWif
+4.0214 x 10- 1
+ 3.976 x 10- 3
- 7.065 X 10-3
0.0
62.4
6.64
4.46
*'
kro
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0:5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.00
10 20
30 40 50 60
Sw (%)
70
80
90
10~'0
krw
o 0 L..L-..I..-...L..-~'S'It~::E:.....l-.--L-..J 0.0
. 0
10
20
30
40
50
60 70
80
90
100
FIg. 13-Drainage and imbibition relative permeability curves for water-wet system.
FEBRUARY 1985
257
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.9
,I
,I
0.8
kro
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.0
10 20
30
50
40
60
70
80
90
108.
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.7
,/
0.6
0.8
0.8
,I--
0.7
lJ. a
0.00
0.7
0.5
0.4
\j
0.3
}'O
0.2
~~
0.1
80
90
0.0
100
Sw (%)
Fig. 14-Drainage and imbibition relative permeability curves for oil-wet system.
y = 0.03885 diem
80
g
ua
70
iL 60
1
5 SO
= 0.3:U6 diem
-;;
c
Swir =A
'Go 40
+B[ln('Y)] + C[ln('Y)] 2 .
.........
(9)
y= 5.SO diem
"0 30
~
l!
0':
20
= 37.9 diem
10
OL---L---~---~--~--~-_-LJ
1000
2000
3000
4000
SOOO
6000
Time, (days)
and
kro(im) =AS * [B+C In 'Y+D In(I-' wll-' 0)] , ........ (5)
258
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6)
. .................... (7)
Table 4.
To evaluate the regression models, three experimental
tests were run using different oillbrine systems. The test
curves were compared with those predicted from the
regression model and with those from the equations
developed by Naar and Henderson. 24 Both a water-wet
and an oil-wet Bradford crude oill2 % NaCI brine system
and a Kendex 0837/2% NaCI brine system were tested.
The Bradford crude water-wet runs for both drainage and
imbibition are given in Fig. 13. In both cases, the regression model yielded slightly larger water relative
permeability values than the experimental data. For oil
relative permeability, the model showed slightly larger
values for drainage but lower values for imbibition.
Similar results were observed for the Kendex/brine
system. 21 For the oil-wet runs (Fig. 14), the model gave
much improved fits over the Naar-Henderson equations
for both phases in both drainage and imbibition.
Application of the Proposed Relative Permeability
Model to a Reservoir Simulator. The reservoir simulator
used was that developed to model two-phase, twodimensional (Cartesian coordinate system) flow 25 The
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY
References
1. Moore, T.F. and Slobod, R.C.: "The Effect of Viscosity and
Capillarity on the Displacement of Oil by Water," Producers
Monthly (Aug. 1956) 20-30.
2. Taber, J.J.: "Dynamic and Static Forces Required to Remove a
Discontinuous Oil Phase from Porous Media Containing Both Oil
and Water," Soc. Pet. Eng. J. (March 1969) 3-12.
3. Melrose, J.C. and Brandner, C.F.: "Role of Capillary Forces in
Determining Microscopic Displacement Efficiency for Oil Recovery
by Waterflooding," J. Cdn. Pet. Tech. (Oct.-Dec. 1974) 54-62.
4. Chatzis, I. and Morrow, N.R.: "Correlation of Capillary Number
Relationships for Sandstones," Soc. Pet. Eng. J. (Oct. 1984) 555-62.
5. Stegemeier, W.: Oil Recovery by Surfactant and Polymer Flooding.
Academic Press Inc., Washington, DC (1977).
6. Downie, J. and Crane, F.E.: "Effect of Viscosity on Relative
Permeability," Soc. Pet. Eng. J. (June 1961) 59-60.
7. Odeh, A.S.: "Effect of Viscosity Ratio on Relative Permeability,"
J. Pet. Tech. (Dec. 1959) 346-52; Trans. AIME, 216.
8. Schneider, F.N. and Owens, W.W.: "Steady-State Measurements
of Relative Permeability for Polymer-Oil Systems," paper SPE 9408
presented at the 1980 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Sept. 21-24.
9.0soba, J.S. et al.: "Laboratory Measurements of Relative
Permeability," Trans., AIME (1951) 192,47-55.
10. Richardson, J.G.: "Calculation of Waterflood Recovery from
Steady-State Relative Permeability Data," J. Pet. Tech. (May 1957)
64-66; Trans., AIME, 210.
259
11. Sandberg, C.R., Gournay, L.S., and Sippel, R.F.: "The Effect of
Fluid-Flow Rate and Viscosity on Laboratory Detenninations of OilWater Relative Permeabilities," J. Pet. Tech. (Feb. 1958) 36-43;
Trans., AIME, 213.
12. Bardon, C. and Longeron, D.G.: "Influence of Very Low Interfacial Tensions on Relative Permeability," Soc. Pet. Eng. J. (Oct.
1980) 391-401.
13. Amaefule, J.O. and Handy, L.L.: "The Effect of Interfacial Tensions on Relative Oil/Water Permeabilities on Consolidated Porous
Media," Soc. Pet. Eng. J. (June 1982) 371-81.
14. Batycky, J.P. et al.: "Interpreting Relative Permeability and Wettability for Unsteady-State Displacement Measurements," Soc. Pet.
Eng. J. (June 1981) 296-308.
15. Lo, H.P.: "The Effect ofInterfacial Tension on Oil-Water Relative
Permeabilities," Research Report RR-32, Petroleum Recovery Inst.,
Calgary, Alta., Canada (Nov. 1976) 5-9.
16. Lefebvre du Prey, E.J.: "Factors Affecting Liquid-Liquid Relative
Permeabilities of a Consolidated Porous Medium," Soc. Pet. Eng.
J. (Feb. 1973) 39-47.
17. Taber, J.J., Kamath, LS.K., and Reed, R.L.: "Mechanism of
Alcohol Displacement of Oil from Porous Media," Soc. Pet. Eng.
J. (Sept. 1961) 195-212; Trans., AIME, 222.
18. Morse, R.A., Terwilliger, P.L., and Yuster, S.T.: "Relative
Permeability Measurements on Small Core Samples," Producers
Monthly (Aug. 1947)19-25.
19. Kyte, J .R. and Rapoport, L.A.: "Linear Waterflood Behavior and
End Effects in Water-Wet Porous Media," J. Pet. Tech. (Oct. 1958)
47-50; Trans., AIME 213.
20. Fulcher, R.A.: "The Effect of the Capillary Number and Its Constituents on Two-Phase Relative Permeabilities," PhD dissertation,
Pennsylvania State U., University Park (1982)
260
E-03
E-02
E-Ol
E+OO
E+OO
Pa's
mN
m
C
em
em 3
JPT
Original manuscript received in the Society of Petroleum Engineers office Oct. 5, 1983.
Paper accepted for publication June 6, 1984. Revised manuscript received Oct. 31,
1984. Paper (SPE 12170) first presented at the 1983 SPE Annual Technical Conference
and Exhibition held in San Francisco Oct. 5-8.