Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 7 April 2009
Accepted 19 November 2009
Available online 6 January 2010
Keywords:
Thin-walled composite beams
Classical lamination theory
Flexuraltorsional response
Nonlinear theory
a b s t r a c t
A geometrically nonlinear model for general thin-walled open-section composite beams with arbitrary
lay-ups under various types of loadings based on the classical lamination theory is presented. It accounts
for all structural coupling coming from the material anisotropy and geometric nonlinearity. Nonlinear
governing equations are derived and solved by means of an incremental NewtonRaphson method.
The nite element model that accounts for the geometric nonlinearity in the von Krmn sense is developed to solve the problem. Numerical results are obtained for thin-walled composite Z-beam and I-beam
to investigate effects of geometric nonlinearity, ber orientation and warping restraint on the exural
torsional response.
2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Fiber-reinforced composite materials have been used over the
past few decades in a variety of structures. Composites have many
desirable characteristics, such as high ratio of stiffness and
strength to weight, corrosion resistance and magnetic transparency. Thin-walled composite structures are often very thin and
have complicated material anisotropy. A large number of practical
problems of thin-walled composite structures require a geometrically nonlinear formulation, such as the post-buckling behavior,
load carrying capacity of structures used in aeronautical, aerospace
as well as in mechanical and civil engineering. However, their
structural behavior is very complex due to coupling effects as well
as warping torsion and therefore, the accurate prediction of geometrically nonlinear response is one of the fundamental importance in the design of composite structures.
The theory of thin-walled open-section members made of isotropic materials was rst developed by Vlasov [1] and Gjelsvik
[2]. In the development of a geometrically nonlinear beam element, basically an updated Lagrangian or a total Lagrangian formulation can be employed. These formulations must be implemented
using appropriate displacement interpolation functions. Bathe and
Bolourchi [3] presented two consistent large rotation nonlinear
three-dimensional beam formulations: an updated Lagrangian
and a total Lagrangian formulation for a 2-node Hermitian interpolation beam. Although a large number of studies have been
performed on the geometrically nonlinear analysis of isotropic
thin-walled structures, it should be noted that only a few deal with
nonlinear exuraltorsional behavior of thin-walled composite
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +82 2 3408 3287; fax: +82 2 3408 3331.
E-mail address: jhlee@sejong.ac.kr (J. Lee).
0045-7949/$ - see front matter 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.11.007
348
was neglected. By extending model of Bauld and Tzeng [10], Omidvar and Ghorbanpoor [15] derived a nonlinear nite element analysis for thin-walled open-section composite beams with
symmetric stacking sequence based on the updated Lagrangian
formulation. Fraternali and Feo [16] formulated a small strain
and moderate rotation theory of laminated composite thin-walled
beams by generalizing the classical Vlasov theory. This beam model accounted for axial, bending, torsion and warping deformations
and allowed one to predict critical loads and initial post-buckling
behavior. Rajasekaran and Nalinaa [17] presented a detailed treatment of the formulation of static, bucking and vibration analysis of
non-prismatic thin-walled composite spatial members of generic
section. The theory was limited to small strains, moderate deections and small rotations. Special attention deserved the works of
Machado, Cortinez and Piovan [1820] who introduced a geometrically nonlinear theory for thin-walled composite beams for both
open and closed cross-sections and taking into account shear exibility (bending and warping shear). This nonlinear formulation
was developed by using a nonlinear displacement eld, whose
rotations were based on the rule of semi-tangential transformation. It was used for analyzing the stability of thin-walled composite beam with general cross-section. However, it was strictly valid
for symmetric balanced laminates and especially orthotropic laminates. Cardoso et al. [21] developed a nite element model for
structural analysis of composite laminated thin-walled beam
structures, with geometrically nonlinear behavior, including postcritical behavior and warping deformation.
In this paper, the analytical model developed by the authors [22]
is extended to the geometric nonlinearity. Based on the variational
formulation, a geometrically nonlinear model for general thinwalled open-section composite beams with arbitrary lay-ups under
various types of loads is given. This model is based on the classical
lamination theory, and accounts for all the axialexuraltorsional
coupling coming from the material anisotropy and geometric nonlinearity. The nonlinear governing equations are derived and solved
by means of an incremental NewtonRaphson method. A displacement-based one-dimensional nite element model that accounts
for the geometric nonlinearity in the von Krmn sense is developed to solve the problem. Numerical results are obtained for
thin-walled composite Z-beam and I-beam under vertical load to
investigate the effects of ber orientation, warping restraint and
load parameter on the nonlinear exuraltorsional response.
2. Kinematics
The theoretical developments presented in this paper require
two sets of coordinate systems which are mutually interrelated.
The rst coordinate system is the orthogonal Cartesian coordinate
system x; y; z, for which the x and y axes lie in the plane of the
cross-section and the z axis parallel to the longitudinal axis of
the beam. The second coordinate system is the local plate coordinate n; s; z as shown in Fig. 1, wherein the n axis is normal to
the middle surface of a plate element, the s axis is tangent to the
middle surface and is directed along the contour line of the
cross-section. The n; s; z and x; y; z coordinate systems are related through an angle of orientation h. As dened in Fig. 1 a point
P, called the pole, is placed at an arbitrary point xp ; yp . A line
through P parallel to the z axis is called the pole axis.
To derive the analytical model for a thin-walled composite
beam, the following assumptions are made:
1. The contour of the thin wall does not deform in its own
plane.
sz of the middle surface is zero in
2. The linear shear strain c
each element.
1a
1b
csz
@ v @ w
0
@s
@z
dx ds cos h
3a
dy ds sin h
3b
Eq. (2) can be integrated with respect to s from the origin to an arbitrary point on the contour,
where differentiation with respect to the axial coordinate z is denoted by primes (0 ); W represents the average axial displacement
of the beam in the z direction; x and y are the coordinates of the
contour in the x; y; z coordinate system; and x is the so-called sectorial coordinate or warping function given by
xs
rs ds
5a
s
s; z
us; z; n u
s; z
@u
v s; z; n v s; z n
@s
s; z
@u
z n
ws; z; n ws;
@z
6a
6b
6c
z
"
2 #
2
@w 1 @u
@v
@z 2
@z
@z
csz
@ v @w
@z @s
dU
7a
7b
x nqdjx 2rn n2 dvz rsz ndjsz dv
Z l
z z nj z n2 v z
csz csz nj sz
15
8a
8b
where
z
1
@w
@z 2
"
2 #
2
@u
@ v
@z
@z
@2u
@ v
@2u
j z 2
@z
@s@z @z
@2u
j sz 2
@s@z
!2
2
@ u
v z
@s@z
9a
z
My
Mx
9d
10a
10c
jy U V U
jx U00
jsz 2U0
vz
1
U02
2
rz x n sin h ds dn
16b
rz y n cos h ds dn
16c
rz x nq ds dn
16d
Mx
Mt
Rz
rsz n ds dn
16e
rz 2rn n2 ds dn
16f
The variation of the strain energy can be obtained by substituting Eqs. (11) and (12) into Eq. (15)
dU
Nz dW 0 My dU 00 Mx dV 00 M x dU00 2M t dU0
Nz U 0 dU 0 V 0 dV 0 M y xp Nz V 0 dU0 U0 dV 0
i
Mx yp Nz U 0 dU0 U0 dU 0 r 2p Nz Rz U0 dU0 dz
17
11a
11b
dV
11c
Z
v
pz dw pn du ps dv dv
18
11e
11f
dV
11d
The resulting strains can be obtained from Eqs. (8) and (10) as
16a
10d
9c
j sz jsz
v z vz
00
rz ds dn
9b
10b
1
W U 02 V 02 r2 q2 U02 xp V 0 U0 yp U 0 U0
2
jx V 00 U 0 U0
Z
A
Nz
z
349
12a
12b
3. Variational formulation
Z
@du
@du
p
n dn
p
s dv m
z
s
z dw
m
ds dz
p
@z
@s
s
19
z ; p
s ; m
z; m
s; p
n are shell forces dened by
where p
z ; m
z
p
s ; m
s
p
n
p
pz 1; n dn
20a
ps 1; n dn
20b
pn dn
20c
PU V
13
1
U
rz z rsz csz dv
2 v
After substituting Eqs. (1) and (4) into Eq. (19), the variation of
the work done by the external forces can be written with respect to
the bar forces
dV
14
P z dW V x dU My dU 0 V y dV Mx dV 0 T dU
Mx dU0 dz
21
350
Pz
Zs
Vy
22a
s sin h p
n cos h ds
p
22b
s cos h p
n sin h ds
p
22c
Other values of Eij can be found in Ref. [22]. The explicit forms of
the laminate stiffnesses Eij for general I-section are given in the
Appendix A.
s r p
n q m
s ds
p
Z
z sin h p
z x ds
My m
Zs
z cos h p
z y ds
Mx m
Zs
zq p
z x ds
Mx m
Q ij 1; n; n2 ; n3 ; n4 dn
27
Vx
z ds
p
where Aij ; Bij ; Dij matrices are extensional, coupling, bending stiffness and F ij ; Hij matrices are higher order stiffnesses, respectively,
dened by
22d
22e
22f
22g
Using the principle that the variation of the total potential energy is zero, the weak form of the present theory for thin-walled
composite beams are obtained
5. Governing equations
The nonlinear equilibrium equations of the present study can be
obtained by integrating the derivatives of the varied quantities by
parts and collecting the coefcients of dW; dU; dV and dU
N0z P z 0
28a
M00y Nz U 0 yp U0 0 M x U0 0 V x M0y 0
28b
M00x Nz V 0 xp U0 0 M y U0 0 V y M0x 0
h
i0
M00x 2M0t Nz r2p U0 yp U 0 xp V 0
28c
My V 0 0 M x U 0 0 Rz U0 0 T M0x 0
0
0
V dV My xp Nz V dU U dV M x yp N z U dU
U0 dU 0 r2p Nz Rz U0 dU0 P z dW V x dU My dU 0
23
V y dV Mx dV 0 T dU Mx dU0 dz
4. Constitutive equations
The constitutive equations of a kth orthotropic lamina in the
laminate coordinate system are given by
rz
rsz
"
Q 11
Q 16
Q 16
Q 66
#k
z
24
csz
where Q ij are transformed reduced stiffnesses. The transformed reduced stiffnesses can be calculated from the transformed stiffnesses
based on the plane stress rs 0 and plane strain s 0 assumption. More detailed explanation can be found in Ref. [23].
The constitutive equations for bar forces and bar strains are obtained by using Eqs. (12), (16) and (24)
9 2
8
E11 E12
Nz >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
6
>
>
M
E22
y >
>
> 6
>
>
= 6
<M >
6
x
6
6
>
>
M
x
>
>
6
>
>
>
>
6
>
>
> 4
> Mt >
>
>
>
;
:
Rz
sym:
E13
E14
E15
E23
E24
E25
E33
E34
E35
E44
E45
9
38
E16 > z >
>
>
>
>
> jy >
>
E26 7
>
>
7>
>
>
>
7>
=
<
7
j
E36
x
7
7
> jx >
E46 7>
>
>
>
>
7>
>
> jsz >
E56 5>
>
>
>
>
;
:
vz
E66
25
E26
E36
E46
E56
dU :
dU 0 :
My
dV :
M 0x
E66
Nz U yp U Mx U
29b
29c
Nz V xp U M y U
29d
Mx
dV :
dU :
M x 2M t
dU0 :
Mx
29e
Nz r 2p
U yp U xp V My V Mx U Rz U0
29f
29g
2
X
wj Wj
30a
j1
26c
26d
V
2D16 r F 16 ds
26e
26f
4
X
uj wj
30b
v j wj
30c
/j wj
30d
j1
4
X
j1
26b
29a
M 0y
Nz
26a
dW :
2B11 r D11 ds
E55
E16
28d
4
X
j1
351
32
TfDgr1
@fRg
@fDg
r1
33
34
35
KfDgfDg ff g
31
The nonlinear algebraic equations of present theory can be linearized using NewtonRaphson iterative method. Solution of Eq. (31)
by the NewtonRaphson iteration method results in the following
linearized equations for the incremental solution at the rth iteration
[24]
f Dg f W
U gT
36
7. Numerical examples
Throughout numerical examples, a tolerance of 103 and
maximum allowable iterations of 20 (per load step) are used to
check for convergence of nodal displacements in the Newton
Raphson iteration scheme. The initial solution vector is chosen to
Table 1
The tip rotations and deections of a cantilever Z-beam under an eccentric transverse load P = 4.45 N.
Lay-ups
Formulation
W (mm)
U (mm)
V (mm)
V0 (105 rad)
U (105 rad)
[0]
Ref. [12]
Ref. [17]
Ref. [25]
Present
0.0000
0.0003
0.0002
0.0000
0.0215
0.0230
0.0216
0.0230
0.0144
0.0147
0.0156
0.0154
4.260
4.350
4.540
4.547
56.600
56.900
56.700
57.653
[45/45]
Ref. [12]
Ref. [17]
Ref. [25]
Present
0.0000
0.0005
0.0004
0.0001
0.0209
0.0214
0.0236
0.0235
0.0312
0.0303
0.0341
0.0351
6.190
6.320
8.120
6.950
56.400
54.800
58.200
60.166
[0/45/0]
Ref. [12]
Ref. [17]
Ref. [25]
Present
0.0000
0.0004
0.0002
0.0000
0.0161
0.0164
0.0177
0.0174
0.0239
0.0227
0.0247
0.0260
4.750
4.850
5.440
5.136
58.400
58.800
57.790
59.833
Table 2
The tip rotations and deections of a cantilever [0/45/0] Z-beam under an eccentric transverse load P = 445 N.
Rotations/deections
Restrained warping
Present
W (mm)
U (mm)
U0 (103 rad)
V (mm)
V0 (103 rad)
U (rad)
Free warping
Ref. [26]
Present
Linear
Nonlinear
LinearNonlinear
Linear
Nonlinear
Ref. [26]
Linear
Nonlinear
0.0000
2.5952
7.6626
1.7378
5.1312
0.0308
0.0129
2.6690
7.8039
1.8141
5.4078
0.0324
0.0000
2.6380
7.7910
1.7590
5.1940
0.0309
0.0000
2.5950
7.6606
1.7377
5.1305
0.0598
0.0152
2.7162
7.8403
1.8654
5.6945
0.0631
0.0000
2.6380
7.7910
1.7590
5.1940
0.2796
0.0530
2.6380
7.7910
1.7590
5.1940
0.3166
Table 3
The tip rotations and deections of a cantilever [45/45] Z-beam under an eccentric transverse load P=445N.
Rotations/deections
Restrained warping
Free warping
Present
W (mm)
U (mm)
U0 (103 rad)
V (mm)
V0 (103 rad)
U (rad)
Ref. [26]
Present
Ref. [26]
Linear
Nonlinear
LinearNonlinear
Linear
Nonlinear
Linear
Nonlinear
0.0078
3.5173
10.3860
2.3540
6.9508
0.0352
0.0127
3.3467
9.7883
2.3392
6.9795
0.0348
0.0000
3.5580
10.5100
2.3720
7.0030
0.0349
0.0133
3.5173
10.3860
2.3540
6.9508
0.0602
0.0069
3.1442
8.9969
2.2718
6.8550
0.0580
0.0922
3.5580
10.5100
2.3720
7.0030
0.4183
0.0178
3.5580
10.5100
2.3720
7.0030
0.4861
352
Table 4
The tip axial and vertical displacements of a cantilever composite I-beam with
symmetric angle-ply laminates h4s in the anges and web under a vertical load
P = 250 N at free end.
Lay-ups
Formulation
W (cm)
V (cm)
016
ABAQUS
Present
0.6124
0.6075
15.9760
15.9113
15=154s
ABAQUS
Present
0.7474
0.7432
17.6434
17.6002
30=304s
ABAQUS
Present
1.3416
1.3404
23.6133
23.6384
45=454s
ABAQUS
Present
2.7501
2.7600
33.7463
33.9294
60=604s
ABAQUS
Present
4.3164
4.3443
42.2037
42.5798
75=754s
ABAQUS
Present
5.0482
5.0838
45.6077
46.0678
90=904s
ABAQUS
Present
5.1983
5.2341
46.2755
46.7453
0=904s
ABAQUS
Present
1.3488
1.3569
23.6829
23.7830
Fig. 3. Load versus the lateral displacement at mid-span of a simply supported
composite mono-symmetric I-beam under different values of initial loading
imperfections with the ber angle 30 and 60 in the anges and web.
at both free ends. As expected, with two lay-ups considered, for linear analysis, the warping restraint has a stiffening effect. That is,
the inuence of the warping restraint becomes immaterial for all
displacements, except for the angle of twist. However, it becomes
signicant and depends on types of lay-ups for nonlinear analysis.
When comparing with free warping model, all the nonlinear
displacements decrease for the symmetric lay-up, whereas they increase for anti-symmetric one.
Next, a cantilever symmetrically laminated symmetric I-beam
with length l 2:5 m under a tip vertical load 250 N at the free
end is investigated. Following dimensions for I-beam are used:
both of anges width and web height are 50 mm. The anges
and web are made of 16 layers with each layer 0.13 mm in
thickness. All computations are carried out for the glassepoxy
materials with the following material properties: E1 53:78 GPa;
E2 17:93 GPa; G12 8:96 GPa; m12 0:25. For comparison, the
axial and vertical displacements at the free end by this study and
the results by 600 nine-noded ABAQUSs shell elements (S9R5)
[27] are presented. The accuracy of the predictions from present
model with the ABAQUSs solutions can be seen in Table 4 for all
lamination schemes considered.
In order to demonstrate the accuracy, generality and robustness of this study further, the buckling behavior of simply supported and cantilever composite mono-symmetric I-beam with
length l 4:0 m under axial force at the centroid is performed.
Lay-ups and material properties are the same with previous
Table 5
Critical bucking loads (N) of a simply supported and cantilever composite mono-symmetric I-beam with symmetric angle-ply laminates h4s in the anges and web.
Lay-ups
016
15=154s
30=304s
45=454s
60=604s
75=754s
90=904s
0=904s
842.28
768.03
577.11
401.65
318.08
292.77
288.15
568.95
Cantilever beam
Kim et al. [29]
ABAQUS
Theory
837.40
766.80
577.30
402.40
318.80
293.10
842.30
768.30
577.80
402.50
318.80
293.10
571.10
571.90
Present
Present
841.00
767.00
576.00
401.00
318.00
292.00
288.00
568.00
216.76
196.25
146.15
101.31
80.18
73.85
72.72
144.99
216.50
196.00
146.00
101.25
80.00
73.75
72.50
144.75
Fig. 4. Load versus the lateral displacement at free end of a cantilever composite
mono-symmetric I-beam under different values of initial loading imperfections
with the ber angle 30 and 60 in the anges and web.
u
v
q
E1 =E2 25;
m12 0:25
37
353
u
b3
38a
38b
b3
qL4
3
E2 b3 t 1
38c
354
Fig. 7. Load versus the angle of twist at mid-span of a pinned-hinged composite Ibeam under an eccentric uniform load with the ber angle 30 and 90 in the
bottom ange.
Fig. 9. Variation of the vertical and lateral displacements at mid-span of a pinnedhinged composite I-beam under an eccentric uniform load with respect to ber
angle change in the bottom ange.
Fig. 10. Variation of the angle of twist at mid-span of a pinned-hinged composite Ibeam under an eccentric uniform load with respect to ber angle change in the
bottom ange.
355
2
2y2 2yp y2 yp B111 D111 y2 yp F 111 b1
2
2y2 2yp CB111 b1 D111 C 2y2 2yp
b1 x3 xp b1 F 111 b1 x3 xp b1
1
2
2y2 2yp y2 yp B211 D211 y2 yp F 211 b2
2
2y2 2yp y2 yp b1 CB211 b2 D211 y2 yp b1
2
2x3 2xp x3 xp B311 D311 x3 xp F 311 b3
2
2x3 2xp y2 yp b1 CB311 b3 D311 y2 yp b1
8. Concluding remarks
A geometrically nonlinear model is developed to study the
exuraltorsional behavior of general thin-walled open-section
composite beams with arbitrary lay-ups under various types of
loadings. This model is capable of predicting accurately nonlinear
exuraltorsional response for various conguration including
boundary conditions and laminate orientation of thin-walled composite beams. The nonlinear governing equations are derived from
the principle of the stationary value of total potential energy and
solved by means of an incremental NewtonRaphson method. A
displacement-based one-dimensional nite element model that
accounts for the geometric nonlinearity in the von Krmn sense
is developed to solve the problem. The present model is found to
be appropriate and efcient in analyzing nonlinear exuraltorsional behavior of thin-walled composite beams.
Acknowledgments
The support of the research reported here by Basic Science
Research Program through the National Research Foundation of
Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and
Technology (2009-0087819) is gratefully acknowledged. The
authors also would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their
suggestions in improving the standard of the manuscript.
Appendix A
E26
39e
The explicit forms of the laminate stiffnesses Eij for composite Isection in Fig. 11 can be dened by
2
D111 b1 x3 b1
2y2 2yp B211 D211 b2
2
2y2 2yp x3 B211 b2 D211 x3 b2 2x3 2xp x3 B311 b3
1
2
D311 3x3 2xp b3 F 311 b3
2y1 2yp B411 D411 b4
2
2y1 2yp b4 x3 B411 b4 D411 b4 x3 b4
1
2
2y1 2yp B511 D511 b5
2
2y1 2yp x3 B511 b5 D511 x3 b5
39b
39d
39f
C
1
1
2
2
y2 yp t1 b1 y2 yp t 1 b2 y2 yp b1 t1 b2
2
2
1
1
2
2
x3 xp t3 b3 y2 yp b1 t 3 b3 y1 yp t 2 b4
2
2
y1 yp b4 x3 xp b3 y2 yp b1 t 2 b4
1
2
t1 b1
y1 yp t2 b5 x3 xp b3 y2 yp b1 t 2 b5
2
t 1 b2 t 3 b3 t 2 b4 t 2 b5
39g
356
References
[1] Vlasov VZ. Thin walled elastic beams. Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientic
Transactions; 1961.
[2] Gjelsvik A. The theory of thin walled bars. New York: Wiley; 1981.
[3] Bathe K, Bolourchi S. Large displacement analysis of three-dimensional beam
structures. Int J Numer Method Eng 1979;14(7):96186. 1.
[4] Hodges DH, Atilgan AR, Cesnik CES, Fulton MV. On a simplied strain energy
function for geometrically nonlinear behavior of anisotropic beams. In:
European rotorcraft forum, 17th, Berlin, Germany; 1991.
[5] Cesnik CES, Hodges DH. A new concept for composite rotor blade crosssectional modeling. J Am Helicopter Soc 1997;42(1):2738.
[6] Volovoi VV, Hodges DH, Cesnik CES, Popescu B. Assessment of beam modeling
methods for rotor blade applications. Math Comput Model 2001;33(1011):
1099112.
[7] Yu W, Volovoi V, Hodges D, Hong X. Validation of the variational asymptotic
beam sectional analysis. AIAA J 2002;40(10):210512.
[8] Yu W, Hodges DH, Volovoi VV, Fuchs ED. A generalized Vlasov theory for
composite beams. Thin-Walled Struct 2005;43(9):1493511.
[9] Yu W, Hodges DH. Generalized Timoshenko Theory of the Variational
Asymptotic Beam Sectional Analysis. J Am Helicopter Soc 2005;50(1):46
55.
[10] Bauld N, Tzeng L. A Vlasov theory for ber-reinforced beams with thin-walled
open cross-section. Int J Solid Struct 1984;20(3):27797.
[11] Gupta R, Rao K. Instability of laminated composite thin-walled open-section
beams. Compos Struct 1985;4(4):299313.
[12] Gupta R, Rao K. Finite element analysis of laminated anisotropic thin-walled
open-section beams. Compos Struct 1985;3(1):1931.
[13] Bhaskar K, Librescu L. A geometrically non-linear theory for laminated
anisotropic thin-walled beams. Int J Eng Sci 1995;33(9):133144.
[14] Librescu L, Song O. Thin-walled composite beams: theory and application
(Solid mechanics and its applications). 1st ed. Springer; 2006.