Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Scientific Theories
an introduction,
G. Frank
edited, with
Philipp
Boston
Copyright
for the
Advancement
of Science
The papers
published here were first presented at the annual meetAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science in
Boston, Massachusetts, December 1953, and sponsored by the Institute for the Unity of Science, he Philosophy of Science Association,
and Section L (History and Philosophy of Science) of AAAS; cosponsored by the National Science Foundation and the Ampriciin
Academy of Arts and Sciences. These articles were published in the
September, October, November 1954, and January and February 1955
issues of The Scientific Monthly, and permission to reproduce any of
the papers or parts therefrom must be obtained from The Scientific
Monthly.
ing of the
Printed in U.S.A.
Contents
INTRODUCTION, by Philipp G, Frank
Chapter
THE VARIETY
Acceptance of
vii
Scientific Theories
by Philipp G. Frank
PRAGMATIC THEORY OF INDUCTION, by C. West Church-
TIFIC THEORIES,
man
18
24
Chapter
II.
29
Jr.
of Operationalism
39
mann
41
Henry Margenau
SENSE AND NONSENSE IN OPBRATIONISM, by Gustav Berg-
67
74
80
Chapter
III.
52
84
by Else
97
THE
115
RICHFIBLJO
128
Contents
vi
137
143
151
159
192
204
233
237
218
Introduction
[Among the
modern
own
century there has been the assertion that science does not give
us the "truth" about the universe but only an abstract model
which
may
system
and
religion.
On
human
Quite a few
and family background of high school students have imbued them with a certain aversion against a field from which
social
so
little
Since,
anyway,
science,
and
particularly,
live
can be learnt.
physical science,
is
is
under-
standable?^
In order to obtain a basis from which one can pronounce sound
judgment about this situation, one should put the question: In
Introduction
viii
pirical sense,
we put
we
and
sociological characteristics of the scientist, because they are relevant for the acceptance of any doctrine. In other words, the
validation of "theories" cannot be separated neatly from the
mechanics to psychoanalysis.
Since about 1930, the "Unity of Science" movement has at-
The
traits
which are
common
to
all scientific
specialties.
on the "Validation of
the American
Frank as
scientist,
Introduction
fac
is
by a measurement that consists in a physical operaSince this method has been successful the opinion that all
carried out
tion.
If
a theory
fits this
requirement,
it
has, according to P.
W.
itself
of "operationalism." Obviously,
Bridghas been
it is diffi-
way.
on the other hand, it is the central point in making theories
testable, the conference devoted one seminar to the "Present State
Since,
of Operationalism." Prominent physicists, logicians, and philosophers participated in the discussion. Besides P. W. Bridgman, the
The "Theory
fields,
Introduction
the conference treated fields that are as far from the physical sciences as one can imagine.
The purpose
of this
M.
Scriven.
role of psycho-
analysis as a science.
It
ferent backgrounds.
The
psychologist
W.
founders of "Gestaltpsychology," spoke from a general philosophviewpoint; N. Rashevski, the founder of mathematical bio-
ical
W.
Seeger (Washington), H. Margenau (Yale), H. Feigl (Minnesota), G. Wald (Harvard), G. Holton (Harvard).
The
Introduction
xi
representatives of the "special sciences" (physics, biology, geology, etc.) were not interested in the general questions which
were discussed in the conference; quite a few "specialists" take
7
had been
Advancement
PHJLIPP
G.
FRANK
Chapter I
Acceptance of Scientific Theories
the
Acceptance
of Scientific Theories
by PHILIPP G.
Among
scientists it is
be" accepted
if
FRANK
and only
if it is
"true"; to be true
means
in this
theory
is
of scientists."
effect
all
tells
that-
the conclusions
observable facts.
only when a vast number of facts has been derived from few and
simple principles. A familiar example is the derivation of the im-
mensely complex motions of celestial bodies from the simple Newtonian formula of gravitation, or the large variety of electromagnetic phenomena from Maxwell's field equations.
If we restrict our attention to the two criterions that are called
domain
and
There
is
all
observations
Acceptance of
Scientific Theories
make a
criterions.
we soon
notice
that attempts of this kind lead us far beyond the limits of physical science.
linear function is
with laws that express proportionsuch as Hooke's law in elasticity or Ohm's law in electrodynamics. In all these cases, there is no doubt that a nonlinear
relationship
facts in a
but one tries to get along with a linear law as much as possible.
There was a time when, in physics, laws that could be expressed
tion of
matical estimation of simplicity depends upon the state of culture of a certain period. People who have grown up in a
mathematical atmosphere
invariants
that
is,
incredible beauty
calculus
is
mean by
theory
Both
parties, the
and
Roman
Acceptance of
Scientific Theories
The observed
facts covered
The
usual
way
community
when
all "scientific"
First, there
of the Coper-
ophy
of Aristotle as
it
was
Third, there was the objection that the mobility of the earth, as
a real physical fact, is incompatible with the common-sense in-
terpretation of nature.
God
its
motion
day and
the usage of words in our daily language, this means that the sun
is moving, in flagrant contradiction with the Copernican theory.
One could, of course, give a more sophisticated interpretation
and say that "God stopped the sun" means that he stopped it in
its motion relative to the earth. This is no longer contradictory
Scientific Theories
Acceptance of
science.
If
all
questions raised
by
must be
must say:
science
is
much more
From
this
more general
by some
in
biblical
human
interpretation
is
meaning
means
comparable with
which
act the happiby
are quite
in asking
is
more favorably
influ-
The
that,
is
a special case of a
much more
general
a theory
Acceptance of
Scientific Theories
to
more observable
tonian laws of motion have a simple form only if the sun is taken
as a system of reference and not the earth. But the decision in
or, to
happy guessing that leads far beyond the Copernican and Ptolemaic systems.
nican system
Copernicus* theory of a
"motion of the earth in a circular orbit" was, therefore, incompatible with "self-evident" laws of nature.
Medieval
scientists
[notion.
a physical law can be derived from "intelprinciples. Again, from the viewpoint of physical science,
Acceptance of
this decision
may seem
Scientific Theories
cannot be made.
to be required,
if
abandoned, would alter the situation of man in the world funFor example, an important argument for the ex-
damentally.
science
would
Thus, social
would become
life
of
man
The
principles,
different but
may
very different.
eventually,
in
when the
the sun and the planets are brilliant; while every earthly object
that becomes separated from the main body will tend to fall
back toward the center and stop there, the celestial objects
undergo circular motion eternally around the center.
To
the earth
among
nicus suggested, would have been not only unnatural but a serious
violation of the rule to keep the principles of science as close
to
common
sense as possible.
We see
by
this
Acceptance of
Scientific Theories
other words, the possibility of expressing the theory in commonsense language. Here is, of course, the source of another conflict
sense.
it
In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, Newton's mechannot only had become compatible with common sense but had
even been identified with common-sense judgment. As a result, in
ics
common
at least,
as incompatible with
theory
battles,
we
common feature, the apprehension that a disagreement with common sense may deprive scientific theories of their value as
incentives for a desirable human behavior. In other words, by
becoming incompatible with common sense, scientific theories
lose their fitness to support desirable attitudes in the
domain
of
planets,
and other
was completely
celestial bodies
different
Acceptance of
10
Scientific Theories
bodies
make
it
more
difficult
it
was
be highly desirable.
Plato, in his
ideal state
stitution of sun
and
that people
report
who taught
them
He
even suggested
scientific theories
We
learn
have served as
When
determine a theory,
trination
fco
became an important
It is
known
to
modern students
of anthropology
is
well
of
of nature, in particular,
Acceptance of
Scientific Theories
11
man
or, briefly
laws.
speaking, as moral
in his essay
may
be
made
to
lever, according to
lift
Nature that
He
used as an
Book
of Genesis.
The
first
human conduct
we glance at the
about the creation of the world. But the story of the creation
serves also as an example for the moral behavior of men; for
instance, because the creation took 7 days, we all feel obliged
to rest on each seventh day.
Flood
is
be cut
off
the rainbow appeared: "When I bring clouds over the earth and
the bow is seen in the clouds, I will remember the Covenant
which
is
between
become a
me and
summer and
winter,
12
Acceptance of
Scientific Theories
that performed
its
Even the
such a theory would weaken the belief in the dignity of man and
in the existence of a soul and would, therefore, be harmful to
In twentieth century physics, we have observed that Einstein's theory of relativity has been interpreted
moral conduct.
determinism and, along with it, the introduction of "indeterminism" into physics. In turn, a great many educators, theologians,
and politicians have enthusiastically acclaimed this "new phys'
iob, or.
Acceptance of
Scientific Theories
13
who
works hard in his laboratory or computation-room would obviously be inclined to say that all this is nonsense that his energy
should be directed toward finding out whether, say, a certain
theory is "true" and that he "should not" pay any attention
to the fitness of a theory to serve as an instrument in the fight
for educational or political goals.
This
itself to
is
certainly the
most active
way in
scientists. How-
human
is
The
is
independent of
when we regard
all
moral and
science either as a
But today,
logically
by
Acceptance of
14
Scientific Theories
human
ophy that they have absorbed since their early childhood. The
theories that are built up by "scientific" methods, in the narrower
sense, are- "pictures" of physical reality. Presumably they tell
us the "truth" about the world. If a theory built up exclusively
reasons.
theory that
is in full
final theory by
a compromise. The final theory has to be in fair agreement
with observations and also has to be sufficiently simple to be
partial
usable. If
on the basis
a prac-
scheme.
In the same
we enjoy
way
that
Acceptance of
Scientific Theories
15
If
The
it is
we
if
we choose
safety, or fun, or
convenience for reading and sleeping as our purpose. It is impossible to design an airplane that fulfills all these purposes in a
^
.
there
is
We
maximal way.
or fun or endurance?
us only
'
making
authorities are,
from the
make
The
If
we
purpose
is
we have
it
is
What
We
16
Acceptance of
discourage an undesirable
Scientific Theories
way
of
life.
we can
vided that
get
man
verse in
which
we wish
to speak in a
more
brief
we
may
If
distin-
guish just two purposes of a theory: the usage for the construction
(technological purpose) and the usage for guiding
of devices
human conduct
(sociological purpose).
The
of science.
Human
cal changes
have to produce
human
social
conduct.
ing changes in
human
life
in
The
conflict
of science
human
is
If
We
and so
forth.
Acceptance of
great
conflict
many
no longer
scientists
Scientific Theories
17
now
it is
completely
(quantum theory)
cators
and
is
politicians
tum
physics.
The
situation in biology
is
is
belief
is
not
If
we
consider
improbable.
but also from "dead matter" undermines their belief in the digof man, which is the indispensable basis of all human moral-
nity
ity.
We
human
all things.
With
all
But even
if
Acceptance of
18
Scientific Theories
we have
still
and
also contains, as
we
learned pre-
Here, restriction to
unam-
to include theory-
human behavior
is
to refrain
by a
theory.
Only
in this
way can
science as a
human
activity
A Pragmatic
Theory of Induction
by
is
C.
WEST CHURCHMAN
to outline the
problem
is
problem is
and decisions. Pragmatism
is
The
which
human
actions
4hat
is
is
reaction
is
knowl
Acceptance of
18
Scientific Theories
we have
still
Here, restriction to
unam-
biguously to a scientific theory. The only way to include theorybuilding in the general science of human behavior is to refrain
by a theory. Only
in this
way can
science as a
human
activity
The purpose
this
here
is
WEST CHURCHMAN
when
when the
problem
phrased
pragmatic terms that is,
problem is phrased in terms of the relationship between evidence
and decisions. Pragmatism is presumably interested in the relais
in
which
is
which
Acceptance of
is
Scientific Theories
ing one or
more
19
its efficiency
is
for accomplish-
the probability
is
of induction depends,
e defined
among
efficiency of policies.
Can this
other
Some
concept
efficiency,
(i)
(iii)
20
Acceptance of
Scientific Theories
that there
to gather the
minimum
other policies
may
one-aim problems with certainty, where (i) dejudged in terms of one objective; (ii) there exists a
Statistical
cisions are
finite set of
(iii)
effi-
efficiency of policies
Simple gambling
can be measured
(i)
one
each decision has a Definite probability of success relative to the objective; (iii) there exists no
objective
is
finite set of
(ii)
efficiency of
maxi-
ever, would in some cases be incorrect, for the errors of the estimates might be quite critical. For example, let us suppose
thaij
one decision is estimated to have a probability of success of 0.75
is 0.25.
That
is
Acceptance of
Scientific Theories
21
probability may lie anywhere between 0.5 and 1.0. The second
decision is estimated to have a probability of success of 0.70, but
this estimate is accurate within 0.01. That is, the true value
should
decision
only
if
ent."
lie
0.71.
is
The
especially
is
may
by some function
The form
estimates.
is
to be measured
of this function
is
not "clear."
(i)
more
agencies, industries,
and so
forth,
is
the estimated probabilities of success of the decisions relative to each objective, the errors of these estimates,
gathering
effort,
cess exists
exists
no
(iii)
evidence sufficient to guarantee the proba(v) the probabilities of success can be esti-
finite set of
bilities of success;
(vi)
Scientific Theories
Acceptance of
22
Examples are
all scientific,
of these estimates
can be estimated.
The
of success
of these estimates.
The
its
evidence,
and
it
has no part
own
is
in both the-
evaluated by science. Since science does make decisions, the question is: How does it evaluate its own policies? Or is it unquestionably true that there are no undecided policy decisions of basic
science? Are all the issues decided by what the "best" scientists
actually do?
2)
The evaluation of
policies
is
it is
and "given"
is
a self-correcting device.
typical
model for
this
Acceptance of
.Scientific
23
Theories
also
(jf)
is
The
is
essentially
control device
that
if
a decision
is
such a nature
is
to say, a
method is
The
perfect scientific
scientific
moment
for
method would
a system that
is
includes
set
a method whereby
ism by which the assumptions of the system are checked and theizr
A system
invalidity is determined at the earliest possible moment.
would be "vicious"
if it
jrtiich
is
The
a system
of scientific
gathering of evidence,
Acceptance of
24
Scientific Theories
Notes
1. S.
2.
C.
3.
State College,
Ames
(1952).
Value Judgments in
the
Acceptance
of Theories
by
RICHARD RUDNER
An
scientific
hypotheses and
theories.
making
entific
since as
hypotheses; and consequently that a logical reconstrucwould entail the statement that a value judg-
ment
is
My
Acceptance of
Scientific Theories
25
some
human self. He is a "mass of predilecand these predilections must inevitably influence all his
activities
not excepting his scientific ones. These traditional
have
never seemed entirely adequate, and the responses
arguments
that some empirically oriented philosophers and some scientists
cannot escape his quite
tions,"
have made to them have been telling. These responses have generally had the following import.
If it is necessary to
before
make
we can have
is an extraproblematic
no part of the procedures involved in dealing
With respect to the presence of our predilections in the laboratory, most empirically oriented philosophers and scientists agree
that this
science
is
is
personal
feelings
minimized.
affect
our
We
or
biases
scientific
on experimental
results
must be
scientist
does not allow this kind of value judgment to influence his work. However much he may find doing so unavoidable,
scientist
qua father, qua lover, qua member of* society, qua grouch, when
he does so he is not behaving Qua scientist. Consequently, a log-
Acceptance of
26
Scientific Theories
tional arguments
judgments
in
But
I think
be made.
method of
science
it
comprised some
hypotheses. But
cepts or rejects
if
this is so,
that
is,
ac-
make value judgments. Since no scientific hypotheever completely verified, in accepting a hypothesis on the
basis of evidence, the scientist must make the decision that the
scientist does
sis is
evidence
is sufficiently
enough"
is
In contrast,
if
How
lower.
hypothesis depends on
The examples
sure
how
in application.
ample, to
It
a mistake would
be.
scientific inferences in
is
know how
Project scientists
serious
demanded
Acceptance of
first
atomic
27
Scientific Theories
bomb
It
would be
consciousness at
all.
the conclusion; instead they have denied the premise that it is the
business of the scientist qua scientist to validate hypotheses or
theories.
scientist's
task
is
only to
is
is,
say,
ology.
The
28
Acceptance of
Scientific Theories
many reflective
scientists.
The
For the
most precious
What
seems necessary (and no more than the sketchiest indications of the problem can be given here) is nothing less than a
radical reworking of the ideal of scientific objectivity. The naive
conception of the scientist as one who is cold-blooded, emotionless, impersonal, and passive, mirroring the world perfectly in the
highly polished lenses of his steel-rimmed glasses is no longer, if
it ever was, adequate.
What is
proposed here
is
lies
at least
Acceptance of
Scientific Theories
29
Acceptance of Theories
by
Few
BARRINGTON MOORE,
JR.
some
part.
The
interesting problem, therefore, becomes not one of ascertaining the existence of such factors but one of appraising the extent
of their impact under different conditions. My task here (1) is
A much
and change
study
<*).
two
any
official
me
to
detail. I
features.
One
is
The other
is
this;
We
all
know
it is
30
Acceptance of
Scientific Theories
the area of politically determined truth and the area of scientifically determined truth. From about the end of World War
II until Stalin's death, the area of political truth
expanded
and
mathematics.
This high social and economic status is held upon the condition of
outward political conformity. The other method is administrative.
Soviet science
scientist
working on
is
The independent
freely choosing his own probthe U.S.S.R. Instead, he must find his
highly bureaucratized.
his
own and
of course,
it is
to the totalitarian
a product of changes
has
Acceptance of
Scientific Theories
scientific
31
work may be
of
interest.
The
tice,
political
scientific activity in
In general,
it
planning and probably even the continuous barrage of MarxistLeninist propaganda, have less effect on the content of Soviet
science and, hence, on what the Soviet scientist accepts as valid
theory than do somewhat more subtle factors. In this connection,
I hasten to add that I am not a natural scientist myself and that
it
skills to
sociological skills
and the
of thought.
lies,
The most
effective
make among
various bodies
idealistic or the
most
Acceptance of
32
Scientific Theories
However,
it is
only when a
is
to research
grant 10.7 per cent of the doctoral degrees that had been recommended during the preceding three years. No indication is available as to
political
how many
which receive
Soviet youth.
the
title
of professor
ments.
There
is
also
in
calculating their
can be more or
They
Thus, students
been
made by
Lysenko
until
decision,
a high Soviet
official
Acceptance of
tions
Scientific Theories
88
events.
do not ordinarily interfere in the routine activities of the scienIn fields where the Party has not issued a pronouncement,
tist.
own
and reasoning
in research
ments of
scientific activity.
was at
genetics in the
summer
of 1948
is
The
discussion of
the most attention in the West. This event was merely part of a
much
movement. Philosophy, biology, linguistics, physiology, cosmogony, chemistry, physics, and mathematics have all,
in widely varying degrees, felt the impact of this movement. In
larger
June 1951, to
itself
was
cite
quantum
34
Acceptance of
may
strike next
must be a
Scientific Theories
by new and
and they
The examination
will
on the influence of
flections
human
sweep
point.
is
bound
The
to
come
stricter
totali-
affairs in
is
that
it tries
re-
one
some
to im-
and
it
Then
scientists.
direction
scientists
may
democratic creed, on the other hand, does not claim to present answers to all possible questions or to pose the way in which
all
human
activities
must be
carried out.
The way
it
attempts
flexibility.
own
agreed-upon
rules.
its
Up
demo-
Acceptance of
cratic one,
85
Scientific Theories
the modification of
human
when the
political creed
other.
am
and the
and
contemporary
scientific authorities to
Methods
of control
make
all
differ
polite
bows
and compromise
The
nant
conflict
efforts of
many
some
ip each
will then
conflict is a familiar
does not
with each
some element of
other's direction.
come a time
likely to
religious
is
one in
that of the
situation there
sense.
Nor can
of us find repug-
can be traced to the fact that both the United States and
is
has remarked, history does not repeat itself because the actors
on the stage already know the outcome of the previous act (8).
The
we understand
it
and
36
Acceptance of
use
it,
Scientific Theories
different.
may
help the
West
Notes
2.
I wish to acknowledge my debt to the Russian Research Center of Harvard University, under whose auspices this work was done.
B. Moore, Jr., Terror and Progress UJSJSJt. (Harvard Univ. Press,
3.
1.
p. 6.
Chapter II
The Present
State of Operationalism
Interpretations
and
Misinterpretations
of Operationalism
by
HENRY MARGENAU
In introducing this symposium on "The present state of operationalism," I deem it proper to keep my remarks brief and general, leaving criticism and appraisal to the active participants.
Operationalism is an attitude that emphasizes the need of
recourse, wherever feasible, to instrumental procedures when
meanings are to be established. Bridgman disavows its status
tory procedures).
as
is
40
concept
is
of percepts.
consistent set,
mediate between
observational data and constructs, confers validity, and such circuits are impossible without operational definitions
operational
in terms of performed or imagined laboratory procedures.
This implies that operations are not the only means of defining
the analysis shows precisely why they
A valid concept must belong to a satisfactory theory which obeys the metaphysical rules. This it cannot
do unless it is susceptible to a formal definition that links it
alone are insufficient."
with observations via operational procedures". Thus, it is necessary, and a survey of scientific method shows this to be true, that
every accepted scientific measurable quantity have at least two
definitions, one formal and one instrumental. It is an interesting task to show how some sciences fail to become exact because
they ignore this dual character of the definitory process* Omission of operational definitions leads to sterile
speculation, to
metaphysics in the sense of the detractors of that discipline;
modern physical
science.
41
GUSTAV BERGMANN
consistent
is
a system of mutually
of and answers to
philosophic questions with the implicit claim that all such questhose that have been asked in the past as well as those
tions
that
may
manner
of the system.
can be
The number
More
conservatively
still,
is
principle,
42
my
last
is
also contro-
first
it.
comment. But
definitions
definitions (whatever it
that
is,
may mean
it
includes partial
commonly, and
is
what more
larly, as
intelligibly, the
may
more
be assumed
called the
The
term 'length
The
(1)
length of this
it,
43
we want
tively, if
true, is the
is
my mind,
sial is, to
as
it
"What
who
voices,
certain
were,
or
is
On
ledge
inferring it from something else that you already know, then
you
have to measure it. This is perfectly commonSo you need not fear that by admitting it you have
will indeed
sensical.
Fundamentally, this
around
it,
is all
tionism as such.
If,
may
Third, one should at least identify some of the philosophic nonsense that was either stimulated by or is in some
sciences.
44
The
main
in detail,
my
of axiomatic calculi.
On this,
as far as I
is
agrees, for
Everybody
same reasons, that the terms
of quantum mechanics must be so introduced. There is disagreement, and that not very serious, only on how much can be
instance, though perhaps not for the
me
is,
counterparts
in the narrower
the advantages of
an illustration and consider the kinetic theory of gases of, say,
sense.
The
empirical terms are in this case those of phenomenological thermodynamics; the calculus is the so-called mechanical
model. Such terms and phrases as 'molecule/ 'the position of a
1890.
would not say, as some who say certain things now would
have had to say consistently had they lived in 1890, that it was
cally, I
then "operationally meaningless" to attribute position or momento an individual molecule. Saying any such thing implies a
tum
censure that
is
46
economy,
not the
one
much more
may
charge, which
is
The lack
of
economy
of as the excess
price.
(2).
Examining in
detail
how
numbers enter
were the only reason why definitions in the narrower sense break
down, it would still be worth while to investigate how far we
real
it will
not in
definition
and reduction
common
explicit
ground.
In
46
fact
it is
Both
natural language. For the rest, there are two issues in this area,
not one. An explicit definition is also complete in that, if it is
one issue
is
The
sense.
The
if
may
it is
would
see that/
which
'if
one were to do
I just proffered in
my
this,
one
imaginary exchange
become
from
flow.
if
explicit
certain statements
The advocates
nism
if
their
mecha-
transcend the immediate issue, are two. For one, these students
feel that a so-called definition which abandons elimmability
is
it
introduces.
For an-
47
other, they are convinced that the formal schema cannot and
need not in all details and trait by trait agree with the idiom.
did, how could it serve its one and only purpose, to be
a tool of philosophic analysis and not, phantastically, an artificial
language to be actually spoken? So the advocates of explicit
For
if it
definition, of
which
am
one
(S)
Some
and
same
who argue
this
what remains
in
way
by the way,
is
synonym being
a harmless meaning
'significance.'
Those
completeness. Supposedly they are too static and cannot do justice to the
moves on two
growth
with logical analysis
is
To
To
explain this
some other
itself,
is
that they do not allow for the assignment of the proper proba-
bilities,
well be so. I
of probability!.
bility! is
new
of the kind
That may
a blind
twist. This,
however,
is
48
critics
harm
in the physical
this is
is,
a behaviorism
some nonsense, mostly misunderstandings owing to the philosome psychologists. By now these misunderhave
standings
happily disappeared; at least, they have been
also
sophic naivety of
pointed out.
in their
The
whole philosophy of
49
operations everywhere.
At the one
operations herded into the same corral. This completely nonspecific use of 'operation* proved confusing. And there was still
To
another confusion.
is
no a
variables.
Nor
from irrelevant
is
tion.
some specious
arguments to those
conceptualizing.
went through
this phase.
is
Such
definability,
ment not
whether
mo-
it 'insti-
most philosophers in
the empiricist tradition do, that there are only two alternatives.
Either institutional concepts are so vague that one may as well
a worth-while
give up hope of ever incorporating them into
of the Army.'
Yet
I believe, as probably
if
you
please,
50
good.
philosophic nonsense
notion of operationism is of two
The
strumentalist misinterpretation; the other, the so-called operaof meaning. The latter, too, 1ms instrumentalist
tional
theory
affinities.
make
one says, by chance. Logically, what matters is that they hapThis alone shows that the
pen, not that we make thorn happen.
to give aid and
whatnoever
operationist footnote has no tendency
comfort to the strange pseudoscientific subjectivism which wants
us to believe that we somehow by our thoughts and actions make
or determine what is in itself an indeterminate situation. I, fo*
not at
one, find myself in a world that is quite determinate,
not
to
my liking.
making and, alas, quite often
my
set of operations/' is
If,
ir
51
also be a scientist's
version of Wittgenstein's dictum that the meaning of a proposition is the method of its verification. So interpreted, it becomes
literally, it identifies
the meaning of a concept not with its referent, but with the
operations one must perform if one wants to test the presence of
this referent.
So interpreted,
it is
an instrumentalist variant of
me
Let
univocal term.
Philosophers
But
later.
this is not to
Notes
In this
article, single
expression that
is
52
4.
5.
6.
"On
its
CARL
fundamental tenets,
is
G.
HEMPEL
closely akin to
made
empiricism.
But logical empiricism has treated experiential import as a characteristic of statements namely, as their suscepsignificance.
tibility to test
by experiment or observation whereas operationism has tended to construe experiential meaning as a characteristic of
namely, as
For
ex-
53
P.
W. Bridgman,
the originator of operational analysis, distinguishes several kinds of operation that may be invoked in speci-
what he
(i)
calls
The
instrumental operations
principal ones
these consist in
and
paper-and-pencil operations, verbal operations, mental experiments, and the like this group is meant to include, among
(ii)
other things, the techniques of mathematical and logical inference as well as the use of experiments in imagination. For brevity,
but also by
among
as symbolic operations.
(3),
scientific
may
refer to
make
2)
To
by means
54
tactual
same
ways
results,
of measuring length)
they
concepts (for
and the
still
data
(3).
3)
The
precise, experimental
have unambigu-
ously specifiable operational meanings serves to insure the possibility of an objective test for the hypotheses formulated by
means
test
or,
rather,
questions
untestable
formulations,
must be possible
given to
it.
to find operations
It will be
found
in
many
cannot
and in empirical science and has provided a strong stimulus for methodological thinking. Yet, the central ideas of operational analysis as stated by
their proponents are so vague that they constitute not a
theory
concerning the nature of scientific concepts but rather a program
for the development of such a theory. They share this characteristic
scientific
test
by suitable data of direct observaand that sentences which are entirely incapable of any
must be ruled out as meaningless "pseudo hypotheses."-
These
program
much a
thesis or
in precise tenns.
a theory as a
and amplified
55
An attempt to develop an operationist theory of scientific concepts will have to deal with at least two major issues: the problem of giving a more precise explication of the concept of operaand the question whether operational definition
tional definition;
the introduction
of
is
all
science.
The
and
restrictive.
An
Such emphasis
operational definition
test conditions.
jat
will
tific
research, but
it is
direct observation
one that,
56
and so
be realized.
A concept thus
if
characterized
all
is
It consti-
test conditions.
But
is
is
to
make a
generalization,
and
is
not actually
this involves
an
do so
in the future.
It is
now
clear that
if
we
me
57
tic
few remarks might be added here concerning the noninstrumental operations countenanced for the introduction especially of
In operationist writings, those symbolic procedures have been characterized so vaguely as to permit the intro-
theoretical terms.
duction,
by a
was to
dike.
If the principles of operationism are to
may be
used to intro-
is
described and by
if
we
68
must
directly
ers (10).
Specification of
Initially, it
may
meaning by
explicit definition
and by
reduction.
terms used in science can be fully defined by means of the observational vocabulary. There are various reasons, however, to
doubt this assumption.
First of
all,
and, as
note<
by operationa
definition
logical
is
logical
is,
of this kind is
ards, since it
is
Another
tions, in
is
allowed
59
finite
number
of nonequivalent
Difficulties
it is
not
are especially
generalized version of definition sentences and
well suited for a precise reformulation of the intent of operational
definitions.
'
As we noted
earlier,
conditions S,
show a
8x-+(CxmRx)
or, in
words: If a case x
satisfies
if
an instance of
1,
if
and only
In Car-
by the sentence
(1)
is
not for
all cases,
In this sense,
it
tion for
(IS).
If
60
mental operations
Operational
would be repre-
appears unnecessarily restrictive, however, to limit the sentences effecting such partial interpretation
meaning
is
granted,
it
might
by one or more sentences that connect
those terms with the observational vocabulary but do not have
expressed,
more
generally,
the form of reduction sentences. And it seems well to countenance, for the same purpose, even stipulations expressed by
sentences containing only nonobservational terms; for
example,
the stipulation that two theoretical terms are to be
mutually
exclusive
may
that
tn ,
tn ,
(i)
more
theoretical terms, 4 1;
fe,
of sentences such
might be introduced by any set
contains no extralogical terms other than
ti, t z
of interpretative sentences,
recently suggested
( 1 4)
The
6]
science resembles
preted,
an axiomatized theory by
its
postu-
true sentences.
fications of
Such
restrictions
is
may
restrictions
on any
meaning
This partial specification again consists in limiting those interpretations of the nonobservational terms that will render the
postulates true.
distinction of analytic
introduction
nonobservational terms
of
is
conceived in this
and experiential
or
all
it.
Rather, experiential, or operational, significance appears as capable of gradations. To begin with one extreme possibility: the
nterpretative eystem
62
be a set of sentences in the form of explicit definitions that provide an observational equivalent for each of those terms. In this
sufficient
terms. Again
in the
form of
definitions
terms
it
introduces.
And
finally,
in
terms
and in
may
may
system
by observational
of its nonobservational
degrees,
The use
of interpretative systems
is
postulates developed
method of meaning
by Caraap and Kemeny. For although
meaning postulates are conceived as analytic and, hence, as implying only analytic consequences, an interpretative system may
imply certain sentences that contain observation terms but no
and are neither formal truths of logic nor an-
theoretical terms
alytic in the
"Rf
"81"
"R 2"
"82":
(2.1)
-Cx).
(2.2)
of Operationalism
63
and for
-(Six
that
Rix
Sao?
R&),
is,
Si, RI,
(3)
S2 R*
,
jointly.
we
distinct
raise serious
as to
possibility
of preserving that distinction in a logical reconstruction of science. This consideration suggests that
tinction, so far
we
we may simply
con-
theory."
The
view of significant
analogous to
liberal
demand
for confirmability
that
is,
partial verifiability.
64
2.
1,
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
The Logic
Modern
ibid., p. 5; qualified
to R. B. Lindsay,
(1937),
of
"A
(1945).
Physics, p. 28.
5, 117 (1938)1
Phil Sci. 4,
on the ground, quite different
the present paper, that operational meaning is only
critique of operationalism in physics,"
essentially
concepts.
9.
procedure
in
dictions."
10.
The
ence
condition thus imposed upon the observational vocabulary of sciis of a pragmatic character: it demands that each term included
The
scales of instruments
condition.
of Operationalism
65
impossible.
To
illustrate briefly, it
soluble in water'
by
'if
facie, to
dissolves.'
define 'x
But
if
is
the
'if . .
then
.
/ is here construed as the truth-functional, or
"material," conditional, then the objects qualified as soluble by the definition include, among others, all those things that are never put in
water no matter whether or not they are actually soluble in water.
This consequence one aspect of the "paradoxes of material implication"
phrase
more
if
restrictive fashion.
The
and meaning," Phil. Sci. 3 (1936) and 4 (1937) and N. Goodman, "The
problem of counterfactual conditionals," J. Phil. 44 (1947).
In other words, it is not possible to provide, for every theoretically permissible value r of the length l(x) of a rod x, a definition of the form
U(x)
= r] = t,C(Pa,P#,
...,
Pnx),
permitted
point, see C. G.
Hempel, Fundamentals
of
Concept Formation
Em-
66
7.
Gustav
The use
of reduction sentences circumvents one of the difficulties encountered in the attempt to give explicit and, thus, complete definitions
of disposition terms: the conditional and biconditional signs occurring
in formula 1 may be construed truth-functionally without giving rise to
also C. G.
14.
15.
"Meaning
postulates," ibid. 3
For the case of Carnap's reduction sentences, the postulational interprewas suggested to me by N. Goodman and by A. Church.
tation
16.
This
is
illustrated
by
The theory T
its logical
it
conse-
are introduced
if
17.
O. Thus T
67
property
of Operationalism
a,
then
it
will
is incurred by using more than one operational criterion for a given term.
C. G. Hempel, "Problems and changes in the empiricist criterion of
Operationalism in Physics
by R. B.
LINDSAY
methodology during the past quarterlively character is the fact that it can
jentury.
token of
its
provide the background of a general symposium for the reassessment of the place of Operationalism in philosophy as well as in
physics.
Many
physical
arise,
produce interest
for
and ex-
laid
68
away
complete,
that I personally desire to raise.
Bridgman's stress on the value of the operational point of
first brought widely to public notice in his book The
Modern
Physics (1927). His views were further deLogic of
veloped in "A physicist's second reaction to Mengenlehre"
view was
literature
Two New
Sciences
W. K.
Clifford
time.
in his
tions
in
It should at once be
this state-
of
of Operationalism
69
of view.
gain attention,
this!
It
was probably
emphasis a meth-
it
will
would
also suffer
misinterpretation.
.to
in such
to
mean
sistency)
results
assume we
may
take this
must be
and
test-
latter.
able through their agreement or disagreement with the
forethe
with
No theoretical physicist could, I believe, disagree
have
One would
going interpretation of physical Operationalism.
therefore supposed that the whole question might be considered
This was my view at that
closed, eo far as physics is concerned.
a little
time (1938). It was therefore with great interest and not
surprise that I studied the
Some
of
collection of
Philo-
The Present
70
sophical Library,
New
sented by
State of Operationalism
Bridgman as
University of London in
1950.
is
ap-
a
and entropy. Once more the distinction between
"paper-and-pencil" and "instrumental" operations is clearly
my
mind:
How much
latitude will
Although
bit
It will be seen that a very great latitude is allowed to the verbal and
the paper-and-pencil operation. I think, however, that physicists are
agreed in imposing one restriction on the freedom of such operations,
know how
to interpret this in
Bridgman. Here
lies
ent paper.
At
own
perhaps it may be well to review briefly
of
so
far
as
I know, is
conception
physical explanation, which,
that of most theoretical physicists, although each man's
this point
my
phras-
ing
is
his
own and
more
mass and
force
mechanics,
into
whose
definition
there
enter
71
both epis-
mechanics, like
F = ma)
Next
by appropriate mathematical manipulation of relaamong quantities all of which have sufficient epistemic
deductions
tionships
significance to be measurable in the laboratory. If these relationships are sufficiently general in character, they are called physical
is,
=%
gt
) ;
structs.
The
or
theory, or the velocity of a single electron in atomic theory,
It
also
mechanics.
in
the state function (^ function)
quantum
enters in the postulates or hypotheses of the theory which, though
often suggested by experience, are essentially and in the last
mind.
analysis free creations of the human
like to raise a question.
should
I
that
It is just at this point
Does the thoroughgoing operationalist (I dislike this term just as
does but see no simple alternative to its use in
much as
Bridgman
this context)
72
seems to
It
me
we
we examine
critically the
sible to
motion.
velocity and
call
large
subsuming large
areas of experience and in predicting hitherto unobserved
phe-
73
nomena. But we should not forget that there are other criterions
of the value of physical theories not to be despised, among them,
example, simplicity of formulation, esthetic appeal, and teachability to others. These have been sufficiently stressed elsewhere
for
to need
am
nub of
my
difficulty.
If indeed
by
is
this discussion
had he not
me
apparently does the holder of the thoroughgoing operational point of view, since it seems to me that in the
so
unhappy as
it
if
planation
is
74
part that there exists some ultimately valid and verified explanation of all physical experience or, to put it in words often used
although to
me
am
ulti-
an incor-
Unfortunately
belief.
To me
the
can reasonably doubt that they will come in the future as they
have in the past.
Notes
1.
"The nature
of
some
New
why
W.
BRIDGMAN
am
anyone
felt
P.
else to
which has certainly got away from me. I abhor the word
Operationalism or operationism, which seems to imply a dogma, or
at least a thesis of some kind. The thing I have envisaged is
stein,
75
operational analysis.
all, it is
So
far as
any dogma
is
involved here at
it is
What
if
pardon
me
if I interject
is
my
much
intellectual distress,
The
AAAS
76
much must be
final picture/'
what
it is
specified.
and obvious
more con-
leads.
Since writing the book, I have never again been able to devote
have had to content my-
fusion.
avoidance of
"operationalism," which
is
An
is
con-
normative aspect to
understood as the
dogma
there
much
that defini-
As
I see it,
operational analysis
is
into
which flows by
itself uniformly and equably. What is more, any person can make
an operational analysis, whether or not he accepts what he supposes to be the thesis of "operationalism," and whether or not he
thinks he is wasting his time in so doing. So far as the "opera-
77
it is
and
clarifying to
make an
want
to
make an
it
might
change
If one has consistently used operational analysis, I think one's
general point of view comes to acquire a certain flavor and certain
considerations come to be emphasized in his thinking; these I
result in a
shall
in his attitude.
endeavor to characterize
briefly.
In the
first place,
one
is
a neurone of the physiologist, and so on, lose their sharpness when considered as processes occurring in time, and the
firing of
is
independent existence.
more or
less self-contained
man
and
duced by any simple verbal device. As a corollary of the continued interplay of the verbal and the "objective" worlds, I
personally have come to feel the value of analyzing our operations
as far as possible into their "instrumental" and "paper-andthat is still
pencil" components and think there is much here
nonscientific
in
done
to
be
much
is
there
unexplored. I think
fields alonor
thesa
78
ment
of
human
immanence of the
ele-
enterprise.
am
is
much
unnecessary-
and
is
certainly
much room
for
im-
be naturally
here,
improvement
forthcoming when the operational point of view has reached a
higher state of development than at present.
provement
I think the
will
With regard
with instrumental operations, I shall answer by givThe first is concerned with the stress at any
and incapable of measurement by any instruno other reason than that the interior points of a
body are inaccessible. However, the stress is connected
retical physicist
ment,
solid
if
for
upon the
free faces,
79
mental significance. Here, what I meant by an "indirect" conthe connection through the equations of elasticity.
Again, the psi function of wave mechanics, defined as a probability amplitude, is at first a pure construction of the theoretical
nection
is
physicist,
but again
it
mean
With regard
to
much
of scientific literature
two points
is
On
the
had
some
between
was
is
on
really saying
tion
of physicists in
point of view suggested itself from observation
action.
80
Beyond Operationalism
by
RAYMOND
J.
SEEGER
W. Bridgman's
As a
fellow-student of
Henry Margenau
in a
economic
clarifica-
The customary
(Poincare, 2)
outlook.
data and of
a third factor that must not be ignored.
thoughtful theory
is itself
thoroughgoing Operationalism
not satisfactory intellectually. For me it has primarily pragmatic, but necessarily incomplete, values. As Planck (3) has
is
there
first.
The day
before Christmas
my little girl
asked, "Daddy, do
you
Eve sleep of a
Scrooge who does not believe in Santa Claus! As we grow older
a more meaningful question emerges: "What do you believe about
believe in Santa Glaus?" Restless the Christmas
may
81
general?" Inevitably, one is forced later to consider more precisely what one does believe. Granted that the final statements of
physical theory must be operational in character in order that
they may be checked with natural phenomena, what about the
initial
axioms? Can
first principles,
mechanics or the
state
line
\//
functions of
seems to
me that not
is
necessarily
We
may
facts,
As
Is
misled
ticipation in the fight is concerned, yes! Yet no one is so
by the metaphor as to picture a real lion in the ring. On the
contrary, progress in science has often been facilitated
by the
82
is true.
The former
an evolving, one.
adequacy of expression may be more important than economy of
thought. You ask me: "What is a??" Usually, I reply: "It is like
latter,
but
this
it is
precisely that."
tions of the
unknown
that
but
it is
not
x-rays.)
is like
may
plete.
classical
form of descriptive theory can simultaneously provide predictability. For example, the esthetic appearance of a completed
building may no longer reveal the crude outline of a simple scafbest
Bohr atom might have been missed if one had to formulate first
the more elaborate theory of quantum mechanics to comprehend
not only the Balmer spectral lines but also multiplet and hyperfine structure, the Zeeman and the Stark effects. Too many
details may fog the main outline. The finalistic operational
world-view, indeed,
may
sible world-constructs
One
may
Operationalism
picture,
may
be real
(in
in our
own
intellectual image,
However
83
arbitrary the description by an observer who cannot be completely detached from a phenomenon, there is an ever-growing
body of physical measurements that can be reproduced inde-
direct
may
cat.
My
At the same
activity."
We
we can go beyond
own
preference, I
conventionalism!
Notes
1.
2.
H.
3.
M.
Poincare",
The Foundations
New York,
New
1913),
York,
1949).
4.
5.
6.
London, 1949).
84
ADOLF GRUNBATJM
maintain that he
is
and
(ii)
why
semantics
when
and
their
human
users.
with pragmatics but rather with the relationships between physical theory on the one hand and the designata or denotata of
that theory in the realm of nature
the other? In this sense
^on
the
of
is
the
of physical theory.
semantics
then,
physics
logic
Now,
it
seems to
me
that, fundamentally,
Bridgman's thesis
is
85
that the distinction between pragmatics and semantics is illegitimate and unfounded, semantics being properly a mere part of
pragmatics. For he writes (2) :
my
No
But the
(3)
justly pointed
but
all
relations
thing like
all
the charge^
Accordingly^ do not see how Bridgman can escape
that he is gratuitously absorbing semantics within pragmatics/
Once we recognize, however, that he regards this absorption as
86
fully justified,
we can
readily understand
why he
writes as fol-
lows (4):
The presence
seems to
me to
of other sorts.
But when
I ask myself
objects exist, or that there is an external world, the only answer that
I can give is in terms of activities of one sort or another.
not at
all
theory of relativity will exhibit the defects of his thesis with particular clarity, as I shall now endeavor to show.
The
we happen
to observe
made
may
suggest misleadingly
with other
human
is
to
beings.
time-direction or to
The relevant
relativistic
human
activities,
crucial difference
as
Bridgman claims
(8)
87
although pre-Einstein physics had postulated the existence of arbitrarily fast^ causal chains, including
the experimental
work
some
of infinite velocity,
W. Kaufmann and
of
others persuaded
Einstein to postulate that electromagnetic processes are the fastest causal chains in nature. Accordingly, in the Newtonian
theory, every two events of nature stand in a determinate, un-
and therefore every class of physical events in which each member sustains an objective relationship of temporal order to every
be only a proper subclass of the totality of
whose
physical events. There will be pairs of physical events
members cannot be the termini of any influence chain and, thereother
member
will
fore, are
operations
way upon
the activities of
description
until
of
we
assign numerical
names
is
made
names
in such a
way
that the
names
or
(time)-
ships
ventions.
on the names
lated objectively, there is no nomological restriction
can
the
then
and
description
or time-coordinates to be assigned,
In
convenience.
considerations of mathematical
be governed by
88
which
taneity and of the need for introducing a stipulation as to
particular pairs of such events will be called "simultaneous."
when
naming, the
relativistic
because no relations of absolute simultaneity exist to be measured that our measurements cannot disclose them; it is not the
is
mere
failure of our
much
as that failure
is
nonexistence.
What
is
reality" (8)
of relativity
[The] root of
a very simple logical distinction which seems to be obvious
to anybody not biased by a solipsistic metaphysics;
namely this: that
often a measurable quantity is not a property of a
thing, but a property
of its relation to other things
Most measurements in physics are not
the matter
is
89
concerned with the things which interest us, but with some kind
projection, this word taken in the widest possible sense.
iirectly
rf
manner
if
material rods
required
conscious
bells
human
any
whereas Bridgman
us (10) that
He
writes
(IS):
What we
is
to say
what we do
than the situations themselves and that we can go further without revising our operations than we can without revising our picture of
stability
to the
attempts to illustrate this claim by specific reference
:
and
says (14)
history of relativity
He
not
Reflection on the situation after the event shows that it should
have needed the new experimental facts which led to relativity to convince us of the inadequacy of our previous concepts, but that a suffius for at least the possiciently shrewd analysis should have prepared
90
bility of
what Einstein
did.
We
should
now make
it
our business
And he adds
since this
proved" (16). I do not think that this thesis will bear examination.
Let us see whether careful attention to the operational anchorage of our concepts could have forestalled or lessened the sur-
relativity.
prises
on
and that
insisted
Would
that
have forestalled the Newtonian assumptions of absolute simultaneity and of the nondependence of mass on velocity, thereby
cushioning us against the surprising results of Kaufmann's experiments? To be sure, it would have done so in the sense that
gain: Newton's
it tells
91
and
restraint
mensely
if
by operationist caution
would have been, among other things, the im-
fruitful
system of
classical celestial
is strictly
mechanics! In fact,
is
make
are equal.
postulational
and extrapolative
ascription
of properties
and
vantages for us without sacrificing the immense theoretical fruitfulness achievable through a description in terms of properties.
it is
measurement but Cantor's theory formulated in terms of properties and relationships, that tells us that we cannot determine the
length of a body AB on the basis of the number of points between
,
on the
AB
other.
92
An
analogous consideration can be advanced against the operainvocation of the principle of equivalence of the general
tionist's
In
all
tionships yields
description.
all
But a
no genuine opera-
why
it is
In
among
fact, it is
other things,
is
not
tributed to the
abandonment
of
however, upon asking what properties and relationships are intelligibly ascribed
by
and
events (18).
Thus, as I see
our knowledge, if
it,
Notes
1.
P.
W. Bridgman, The
[referred to later as
New
York,
of Physical
93
Theory (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N. J., 1936), pp. 8-10 [referred 1o later as NPT1 ; "Some implications of recent points of view
in physics," Rev. Intern. Phil. No. 10 (1949), pp. 1-3 [referred to later
as RPVP] ; "The operational aspect of meaning," Synthese 8, 255 (195051)
[referred to later as
OAM
1,
258 (1951)
1954),
% OAM,
3.
NPT,
pp. 8-9.
4.
5.
6.
RPVP,
R?VP,
OAM,
p. 256.
NPT
For details
pp. 255-256;
t pp. 9-10; and LMP, pp. 6-9.
material from the special theory of relativity which is pertinent
here, see A. Griinbaum, "Logical and Philosophical Foundations of the
Sp&cial Theory of Relativity," American J. of Physics 23, 450 (1955), 2,
See
QAM,
on the
and "Fundamental Philosophical Issues in the Special Theory of Relativity" in K. Sapper (ed.) Kritik und Fortbildung der Relativitatstheorie, to be published in Europe.
8.
9.
H.
11.
94
NPT,
12.
See
13.
0AM, p. 257.
LMP, pp. 1-2.
LMP, p. 24.
0AM, p. 255.
14.
15.
16.
attitude
RPVP,
111.,
and
p. 19.
pp. 9-10.
on
See also
RPVP,
p. 193 of his
458 (1937).
For a logical analysis of the supplantation of specific Lorentzian philosophical conceptions by Einstein, see A. Gninbaum, "Logical and Philosophical Foundations of the Special
J. of Physics 23, 450 (1955),
5.
Theory
of Relativity,"
American
Chapter III
Freud's Psychoanalytic Theory
FRENKEL-BRUNSWIK
Many
out that the earlier ultrapositivistic requirements, according to which all principles of physics should be formulated
by using only observable qualities, has been broadened to include
(1) points
indirection; Einstein
(2)
Hempel
(S)
it is
98
is certainly not in all respects justified. However, modern physics and psychoanalysis have in common a turning away
from the "natural" to a "fictitious" language. And the common
analysis
inter-
and not
Today many
psychoanalysis may be reformulated in terms of behavioral patterns in such a manner that the facets of behavior connected with
the
more genuinely
biological
the id
parental
Whereas
positivism
in
was
and
the superego.
logical
With regard
of,
and a tolerance
for,
theory per
se.
some
critics
have objected to an alleged lack of sophistication in Freud concerning the philosophy of science and to his
of psychoanalysis
some
of his followers,
temological problems.
logical
and
epis-
p.GOf),
... are
depends on
no arbitrary manner, but determined by the important relations they have to the empirical material relations that
we seem to divine before we can clearly recognize and demonstrate
99
them.
Progressively we must modify these concepts so that they
become widely applicable and at the same time consistent logically.
The
Then, indeed, it may be time to immure them in definitions.
science of physics furnishes an excellent illustration of the way in which
even those "basic concepts" that are firmly established in the form of
.
Most
clinical descriptions
the "unconscious." Freud considers the assumpas necessary because the data of consciousunconsciousness
of
tion
tial construct of
and
symptoms
or obses-
sions in the sick, let alone the sudden inspirations of healthy persons.
fall
makes the
demon-
into a
strable connection.
From
They
not be
expressly included "dispositions to behavior which may
must
therefore
agree with
manifest in a given special case."
We
Freud that
it
is
by
and to
100
interdependences"
(p. 36)
their
formal model.
used, this
is
can be inserted in the gap between the two systems and that help
to recover the latent material in a process of interpretation.
Obviously to avoid confusion concerning mentalistic reification,
common
consciousness as the
unconscious)
when
Cs
(for consciousness)
and Ucs
(for the
sense.
Only
term "unconscious"
One
of the chief
reasons for this shift was the empirical realization that not only
the id but also the superego is in part unconscious. In effect this
merely underscores the increasing emphasis on the systemcharacter of Freud's basic concepts and the decreasing emphasis
on the more introspectionistic distinction between conscious and
unconscious.
anatomy
exists."
If so far every
attempt to establish a localization of his constructs has miscarried, the present imperfect state of the biological sciences must
be held responsible. Siegfried Bernfeld (8) has amply pointed
out the influence of Helmholtz' physicalism and of the principle
of conservation of energy
on Freud. But
was
it
must be
stressed that
101
did not occur until after he freed himself from the search for such
analogies and turned to
itself
by
we
its
simplicity, in
we must defend
fit
which
all is
complexities of
expectation of
being guided in the end by those very complexities to the recogniis at once simple in itself and at the
all
(9, p.
122)
still
it is
that of "instinct"
The psycho-
of
analytic concept of instinct is complicated by the assumption
far-reaching transformations and disguises, particularly of the
fully
more
striking examples
of this variability.
It
may
well be
102
is
duplication by fully considering the functional ambiguities inherent in the relationships between drives and behavior rather
The mixture
an understanding for
He
concept of instinct.
difficulties in his
speculations about
the instincts
We
ment alistic
introspectionist
and that
or
tural" vocabulary,
must add
what Frank
(1)
recognized in physics as a legitimate or at least tolerable ingredient of the earlier stages of concept formation.
Whereas the
than
it is
One
is
is
more important
in
psychology
in physics.
of the
the turning
Freud's Psychoanalytic
Theory
103
sonality as
it derives from
introspection or from the direct,
"phenotypical" observation of external behavior segments. An
example is the reinterpretation of overt friendliness as a sign of
underlying hostility, or of extreme tidiness as a sign of preoccupa-
evidence
of circumstantial evidence
it is
and
havior.
These
role in
as that of
Tolman
(11).
dominant
in such neo-behaviorist
The regrouping
systems
of manifest observable
facts as
that
we may
Tolman
it
perceptual thing-constancy
external object.
(12)
it
of
By
relativism
and
from an almost
exclusive emphasis on the id and on motivation to an increased
concern with the ego that is, with reality-oriented behavior and
in the
of psychoanalysis
so,
psychoanalytic expansion
104
and there
by an explicit
integration of psychoanalysis with psychology proper and with
sociology. The conceptual tools of psychoanalysis just are not
sufficient to explain fully rational and social behavior (10). In
fact, if we were to deny this we would obscure the essential theoin this direction has been
are a
number
real,
which
is his
discovery of motiva-
tional dynamics.
is,
in
toward
society, this
tions gained
With
all
the satisfac-
so far as motivation,
has
achieved
a legitimate
per se, is concerned, psychoanalysis
reconstruction of objective causes rather than a mere pseudoexplanation in terms of subjectively experienced motives as such
all this
said
it
Toulmin
(18)
and Flew
(14)
It is of
psychoanalysis
is
"introspectionistic."
As everyone knows,
it is
105
we have learned
to
dynamisms
of the "inner
man"
doubt
of the
shown
terminology of the classical behaviorisms so-called "stimulusresponse" approach, useful as it may be in certain contexts, has
its difficulties
and
limitations.
As we have
seen, the
major em-
had been introduced did the structure of the neurosis and its
relationship to the patient "become conspicuous." Since the relationship of these phantasies to external factors is most complex
and ambiguous, it seems heuristically fruitful to assume the
internal
their
Contrary to
operational specification
not
do
carry us outside
Skinner, I believe that such assumptions
full
for
a later time.
106
by means
It is without
doubt
tive
from the standpoint of logical analysis, there is no alternabut to be behavioristic in any psychological endeavor;
analysis
others,
is
interested,
is
generally quite
what we now
theory, at the
rems
in psychoanalysis.
Feigl
(17)
it
together
(18)
beyond
calls "surplus
meaning." In terms of a distinction recently injected into psychological theory by MacCorquodale and Meehl (19) this latter
group of concepts would seem to be "hypothetical constructs,"
,
own rather sketchy analythe last-named authors point out that such terms as "libido,"
"censorship," or "superego" were in psychoanalysis originally
of empirically observed data. In their
sis,
107
Both Carnap
(6)
and Hempel
(8)
have made
it
fest, dispositional
The
and hypothetical
retained as a
be
nonetheless
opinion,
constructs
may,
in
my
gradual one involving different degrees of indirectness of evidence or different kinds of surplus meaning. Possible relationships to the distinction
ging somewhat behind; in the definition of such theoretical constructs as superego, ego, and id, the major emphasis is on their
structural relationships to one another rather than
on
their rela-
tionships to observation. His frequent oscillation between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables has afforded some
and the
protection against both a too narrow operationalism
dangers of meaningless generalization.
Considering now briefly the attempts at confirmation of psychoanalytic hypotheses, it must be pointed out that by involving
concepts more removed from the immediate data, psychoanalysis
108
may
Frank
(1) that
modern physics
and that this
Tradi-
tional
since
U,p.
19f).
In reviewing the extensive literature on objective studies of psychoanalytic hypotheses (20 f 21), one is impressed by the fact
that the more descriptive types of hypotheses involved in the
This
may become
and
all,
verified even
109
encies.
all
psychoanalytic
theory, the manifest and the latent, and can be shown to underlie
most
if
not
all
of the specific
possibility of
with motivation in
its
of self-deception (it)
In the former study a comparison of over-all motivational ratings with specific behavioral manifestations is used for a "rational
reconstruction" of the cues underlying the so-called "intuitive
inferences"
would
made by
more
explicit
made by the
psy-
further
promise for behavior prediction of an "either-or" type,
other than "dynamic"
specification of which must hinge on
factors.
Among
110
self-descrip-
realities
The use
of such
evidence furnished
by academic psychology
itself
constitutes
has provided
and
memory,
of pathologic
symptoms,
myth, and other
Some
One
of these
The vocabulary of
everyday language does not furnish us consistently with two
separate sets of terms, one for overt behavior and the other for
additional difficulties
is
a semantic one.
underlying motivation. Unless we drastically depart from familiar usage, the term "friendliness," for example, stands either
for the basically friendly outlook on life or for the techniques
meaning
of our
common
These terms
also
HI
The conceptual
we may
entities
experiences.
But motivations
made
conceptually and
operationally independent of each other so that their far-reaching actual independence under the principle of alternative mani-
be brought
festations can
An
out.
much
n the history
had
of science, there
was
112
by both
psychiatrists and
final
alleged
Together with the cognitive resistances just outlined, ethical connotations may be the
chief determinants of the acceptance and further destiny of any
ethical implications of psychoanalysis.
scientific theory.
It
is
Weber saw
stature,
(24)
an expression of a tendency to
loosen our basic ethical principles. In a letter of 1907 Weber
in psychoanalysis
by the prevalence
it
may
all
the reser-
the mechanism of repression. Most pre-psychoanalytic ethical systems stress such inhibitory devices as the looking away from evil, or its denial,
is
is
ma-
113
ethical relativism.
whelmed by
its
As we have
seen, psychoanalysis
was so over-
role of irrational
was
by reason
the other hand, has been criticized for having given too
his one hope
prominence to the irrational, while in fact
overcoming
much
is
the
Freud
114
Modern
1.
P. Frank,
2.
3.'
4. S.
5.
Collected Papers
Freud, "Instincts and their vicissitudes" (1915),
Papers, vol.
6.
7.
8.
9.
4,
pp. 22-29.
10. E.
11.
York, 1932).
Brunswik, Wahrnehmung und Gegenstandswelt (Deuticke, Vienna,
12. E.
1934).
13. S.
and
Human
Behavior (Macmillan,
New
York,
1953).
16.
17.
18.
Chicago, 1938).
19.
20.
Calif., 1952).
Freud's
Psychoanalytic Theory
115
R. I
21.
Critique of Psychoanalytic
Concepts
and
Theories
by B. F.
SKINNER
complex
obscure-could be shown to be the
product
of arcumstances in the
history of the individual. Many of the
causal relationships he so
leasly
He
sciences.
carried the
116
of instances
My
life
mental apparatus
act in
It
is
is
how
the
it.
difficult
refers to
in noncontroversial terms,
of topographic description
and
ideas, wishes,
tive tendencies,
and so on
interacted
proper names: the id, the ego, and the superego. These systems
divided among themselves a limited store of psychic energy.
There were, of course, many other details.
No
at
the age of seventy define the goal of one's life as the exploration
of an explanatory fiction. Freud did not use his "mental apparatus" as a postulate system from which he deduced theorems t v
real,
117
philosophy of
of his
own
novel features
devising.
scientific
mental ap-
would be
difficult to
prove or disprove
this.
However,
of scientific think-
ing, if
that
Whether
he justified the constructs as necessary or at least highly convenient. But awareness of the nature of the metaphor is no defense of it, and if
own
constructs.
modern science
When
is
still
this
was the
case,
occasionally metaphorical,
member
is
118
continuing to do
so.
own metaphorical
is
rea-
is
best
which are primarily concerned with explaining the spontaneity and evident capriciousness
of behavior. The living organism is an extremely complicated
of animism,
an inner determiner,
or
a "demon," "spirit," "homunculus,"
"personality" capable
of spontaneous change of course or of origination of action. Such
an inner determiner offers only a momentary explanation of the
to invent
to bring the
study of a causal
series
He
pointing to hitherto unnoticed external causes in the environmental and genetic history of the individual. He did not, there-
thinking. It led
him
he had discovered as a
Some
environ-
119
He made no
established science,
from
date.
may
be inferred
much
moment of
little is
known
at the
later
these
way.
Enough
is
known
of the nervous
and to
system to place certain dimensional limits upon speculation
fiction. Freud accepted, therefore,
clip the wings of explanatory
mental
a
of
fiction
life, avoiding an out-and-out
the traditional
dualism by arguing that eventually physiological counterparts
would be discovered. Quite apart from the question of the existence of mental events, let us observe the
briefly
upon two
damage that
problems that
has been adopted.
classical
resulted
is
to be observed.
is
who
120
have been
cated a
still
if Freud had taken the next step, advoby the American movement called Behavior-
greater
little later
is
life
can be ma-
Nevertheless,
it
is
first
processes initiated
of proof
of the dualist.
convincingly pointed. The cogency of these variables was frequently missed because the variables were transformed and
obscured in the course of being represented in mental life. The
physical world of the organism was converted into conscious
lost.
is
many
if
121
may
be missed that
per
se.
it stole
symptoms
of an underlying disturbance.
Among
the problems
their due,
we
was never
was never well
unit of behavior
of behavior
represented.
events.
We
curred to
are
me
much more
to ask
him
his
him
In spite of
especially true of verbal behavior.
Freud's valuable analysis of verbal slips and of the techniques of
wit and verbal art, he rejected the possibility of an analysis
way.
This
is
own
of perception
was
also slighted.
it is
an
To
act,
an object is
and something very much like it occurs when we see an object
and dreams were for
although no object is present. Fantasy
see an object as
122
is
not essential
is
The dimensions
2)
emphasized.
dynamic prop-
first
and
so on.
The
delicate question of
to be quantified
how
probability of action
is
constructs
and emotions
in his
own
Freud's
An
later to be expressed
an adult.
nephew.
To
classify such
rivalry obscures, as
we have
many
specific properties
128
of the circumstances themselves regarded as independent variables in a science of behavior. To argue that what was learned
was the
upon
how was
by
How
illness?
Did he
Did he
learn to injure
and
if so,
immune
to punishment?
We
meant" by sibling
upon the mental apparatus. Such an
rivalry or
by
its effects
is "all
that
is
124
An
datum, of probability
which Freud,
in common with his contemporaries, fell. There are many words
in the layman's vocabulary that suggest the activity of an organism yet are not descriptive of behavior in the narrower sense.
Freud used many of these freely for example, the individual is
bility is usually
pitfall into
and so
on.
We
he engages in other behavior just because it displaces the punbut repressing is not action. We say that he de-
ished behavior
cides
upon a course
but there
is
of conduct either
own behavior
one
the
difficulty is that
when
Among
process of self-control
any
they are not, for example, what happens
wish evades a censor but simply as ways of repre-
subdivision thereof
when a skillful
senting relationships
I
among
125
havior of the organism and never approached many of the scientific problems peculiar to that subject matter, it is not surprising that he misinterpreted the nature of the observation of one's
own behavior. This is admittedly a delicate subject, which
presents problems which no one, perhaps, has adequately solved.
But the act of self-observation can be represented within the
framework of physical science. This involves questioning the
He
may
himself, however,
insist
upon the
of
periences that others wish to question. There are other ways
circumstances.
such
under
or
felt
seen
what
is
actually
describing
in particularly close contact with a small part
of the universe enclosed within his own skin. Under certain
Each
of us
is
limited circumstances,
we may come
universe in unusual ways. But it does not follow that that particular part has any special physical or nonphysical properties
or that our observations of it differ in any fundamental respect
show elsewhere
why
from
tions
(4)
how
have tried to
and
are troublesome
likely to be subject to limitations that
the point of view of physical science. Freud's representaof these events was a
personal contribution in-
it is
particular
fluenced
at least
possible to be wholly nonmetaphorical,
we may improve
The
is
126
them was
We
begin by
to
events
in
individual
the
his
of
behavior
the
genetic
attributing
and environmental history. We then note that because of certain
may come
to describe
say that he
is
some
of
We may
of self-description, as of self-
It is
we need
not
superimposed upon
leads
conduct
causes
of
to
the
be aware of important
naturally
broader conclusion that awareness of cause has nothing to do
is
key
entities
would be unquantifiable
tities in science
in the sense in
its
which en-
One can
among psychoanalytic
paratus.
There
is
primary
level.
Although
it is
occasionally
127
necessary to refer to
organizes
terms at a lower
level.
The
all
these imply
may
changes that
direction
sions of the
is
eventual union with physics or physiology only through the discovery of neurological mechanisms that would be the analogs of,
of, the features of his mental apthis
Since
depended upon the prosecution of a science
paratus.
of neurology far beyond its current state of knowledge, it was
128
in
jeopardy as a
life goal,
but
was
it
Notes
1.
Work
of
New
York,
1.
2.
B. Frenkel-Brunswik, p.
3.
Although
97ff.
Human
Behavior (Macmillan,
New
York,
1953).
The
Scientific Status
of Psychoanalysis
JEROME RICHFIELD
by
This paper
some
is
primarily an
and statements ordinarily involved in discussions of the relationship between psychoanalysis and science are arbitrary, confused, and
inadequate.
scientific
129
When
but when physics is discussed the questions are aimed at discovering the nature of science itself. Thus, whether or not psychoanalysis is deterministic has been considered a factor in evaluating
its
tion set
status as a science. Yet in quantum physics, the limitaby Heisenberg's uncertainty relationship on any strict
application of the principle of causality has resulted in the judgment that science is no longer deterministic (2). There is n<?
two
upon the philosophic consideration of
term
science.
The
It
between some
ground for their repudiations in a discrepancy
The sciscience.
of
some
and
concept
aspect of psychoanalysis
been
has
impugned on the
entific character of psychoanalysis
man
is
not a machine.
And
it is
de-
psychoanalysis
explanations
neurostatement attributed to the orthodox determinism of
!30
Most
difficulty
critics
with the
be said to be
its
little
scientific character of
limitations in the
way
of controlled experimenta-
way
its
extraordinary pro-
theoretical schisms
many
cant respects.
It should not be at
modern physics
in signifi-
all
status" of any
field.
Although these questions are regularly
phrased in familiar terms, it does not seem to have been sufficiently appreciated that the common unexplicated use of a term
Many
biguous use.
And
since the
and evaluative, or
Questions about the nature of science are not scientific questions; they are not like those concerned with the nature of zebras,
Freud's Psychoanalytic
Theory
131
logical,
is not the
privilege or the responsibility of the
to
make
very many of the prescriptions that would
philosopher
be entailed by a critical use of the term scientific. But it is a
Perhaps
it
in the
way
tion of a
of meaning. This
few of the
may
against psychoanalysis.
One old and persistent charge against psychoanalysis compares
it with mysticism (5)
The argument here depends upon the proposition that knowledge is of two kinds, perceptual and inferen.
tial.
of
deemed "genuine
of
by what
science."
ential
perceptual or inferlogic or
an empirical
in this
way
is
conventionalized,
tual investigations.
it
it is
132
is
affective relationships.
The
psy-
some
third kind of
inferential.
knowledge that
is
its
explanation.
The
question
is
emotional states.
pressed in a
Here the
making
rule
is
entirely acceptable.
a significant assertion
if its
We
cannot be said to be
falsity is inconceivable.
Do
by
citing studies
cism"
(6).
it
can readily
133
The
char-
highly elliptical statements concealing much theoretical complexity. We should not understand the psychoanalyst to be
asserting simply that the concept of an anal character implies
stinginess in one case
and extravagance
in another.
What
is
in-
tended
is
extravagance.
In some cases, the so-called "opposite" traits, which are held
to reveal "the same underlying condition," are not real contraries.
And
parent only.
and
The psychoanalyst
stingy
is
The
same hypotheses
will relate
is apboth extravagance
by analyzing extravagance
when the single term
difficulty arises
is
"really" stingy.
It is frequently objected that psychoanalysis has not yet exceeded the outmoded level of nineteenth century biology in its
explanatory mechanism.
There is no question that psychoanalysts use the term instinct
and its cognates extensively. But let us question this usage to
is ordinarily involved in its psychosome
than
unspecified analogic function. Most
analytic meaning
basic biological
psychoanalysts do not believe that there are any
134.
non experienced
directly as an "urging energy," which, in combination with certain external stimuli, will lower the excitation
level of the
The primary
But they
differ in significant
From the
and
political factors.
it is
unfortunate that
psychoanalysts use the word instinct. But this does not falsify
any psychoanalytic correlations or invalidate the principle of the
homeostatic model used in psychodynamic explanation.
We might hope to
settle
status of psychoanalysis
if
we might
Then by examining
its
conformity to
this procedure
would not
entific credentials?
conformity might
To show how
arise, let
distinguish
it
ist.
First,
135
The psychoanalyst
is
limited as well
by the
make psychoanalytic
In principle, at least, the integrity
of the experimental subject can be preserved by interpreting all
variables to be controlled.
experimentation unfeasible.
The
prin-
analytic hypotheses.
Finally, in contrast to physics, which
psychoanalysis
is
is
an ahistorical science,
in the history
psychological significance at some particular point
or reprosimulation
if
the
Even
a
of
experimental
personality.
its
action
upon a
different
of systematic study.
not, then, be considered a requirement
It seems that there is neither a clearly justifiable basis nor
Most methodological
criticism
changing.
characteristics of
general
are to determine
136
meaning of science is to be purely a pragmatic convention, determined and exclusively modified by the nature and problems of
quantum
development of scientific principles. Psychoanalysis cannot passively await the outcome of the convulsions that currently beset
the philosophy of science.
way
The term
when it
ful
scientific
is
method
is
at present clearest
and most
use-
men
in search of systematic
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
&
Faber, Lon-
137
MICHAEL SCRIVEN
between them. It
is
this:
Does the
is
ever
fruitful.
me
138
events in a
result of a
made
as a
been
spring of the
air,
and
the
these
interpretation of history
more
plausible at
first sight
is
this theory is
let
response frequency
that
we
half
really infer
the truth, for we do observe that a man is intelligent or introverted or unconsciously motivated. So the distinction between
Freud's Psychoanalytic
Theory
139
on the
issue.
that more
"how"
The answer
question.
of sufficient generality to
140
within a very
But even
many
different directions,
toward engineering
different subjects;
hypotheses, concepts, and theoretical terms of which the Freudian vocabulary affords an interesting, though imperfect, example.
and
WOLFGANG KOHLER
by
machines? It might at
by
first
by
Who
tion.
not
criticize
us too severely
if
we
more gen-
may
now try to
indicate
144
we
we
much more
specific
ical
clude
The
action which
would not be
in line with
simple example will make this clearer. One can easily coman
electric current to take a course which has the shape of
pel
a W. For this purpose, it will suffice to conduct the current
through a rigid wire, part of which has this shape, and is kept in
this
is
impressed upon the current only by the described arrangement. It is in this fashion that physical events
are forced to follow prescribed ways in man-made machines.
The form
We
of a
is
process
first,
the curve
may
oi
the change
is
such that
it
it
145
area.
The
prescribed. Rather, it
When
they had to perform prescribed movements. Again, when Descartes tried to explain the order of organic processes, he began
at once to think in terms of anatomical arrangements which
It never occurred to
him
from such arrangements, directions inherent in biological dynamics might play a major part in the self-maintenance of living
systems. Even in our time, it seems sometimes to be felt that,
dynamics of a system
result is likely to be chaos.
Krhen the
ihe
is
allowed to operate on
its
own,
;ake courses
fashion
made
it
possible for
them
to maintain themselves.
it
145
area.
The
is
prescribed. Rather,
they had to perform prescribed movements. Again, when Descartes tried to explain the order of organic processes, he began
at once to think in terms of anatomical arrangements which
It never occurred to
him
from such arrangements, directions inherent in biological dynamics might play a major part in the self-maintenance of living
systems. Even in our time, it seems sometimes to be felt that,
when the dynamics of a system is allowed to operate on its own,
the result
is
likely to
be chaos.
assumed to be of divine
that the anatomy
in this fashion
origin;
of organisms
made
it
146
In our time, evolution has taken the place of such agents. Evolution has, of course, no interests and no purposes. Nonetheless, if
we follow Darwin, living systems tend to change in a particular
direction, the direction in
explain the changes as such. What is their nature from the point
of view of science? Darwin did not explain his theory in specific
physical terms. In this respect, his work does not entirely satisfy
the theorist of our time. However, his statements clearly imply
merely modify actions which occur for dynamic reasons. Consequently, the principles of dynamics cannot be ignored in a theory
But, actually, they are almost being ignored in
this particular theory. Does the general principle of evolution
of evolution.
theory of evolution,
it
changed no law of
forces nor new elementary processes. In this respect, the
principle is therefore one of invariance rather than of change.
new
we then
Nobody
will
deny
that,
The anatomy
of the
human
147
Clearly,
no such conclusion
can be shown that organisms maintain themselves, not only because of useful anatomical conditions
in their interior, but also for reasons inherent in the principles
would be
justified,
because
it
of dynamics.
In the
It is
first place,
we must remember a
to take a course
a most important sense, they are not. The very way in which
they exist differs widely from the way in which constraints
exist in machines.
of
solid
objects; they
are
anatomy
'
temporary
is
all
organs,
148
of the anatomical parts under consideration is maintained because there are further anatomical constraints which force meta-
said
For,
have to be repeated with regard to such hypothetical arrangements of a second order. They, too, would surely be steady forms
of processes, rather than .solid objects, and would therefore be
subject to the same reasoning. Anybody who is familiar with
the history of science will admit that, when theories take such a
turn, something is probably wrong with basic premises.
At
this point,
inclined to do so.
It
seems preferable
in vitalism.
now
am
not
to consider a second
is
all its
Now
by
if
the
special anatomical
It will suffice
if
we
numerable "degrees of freedom." To a large extent, its distribution is therefore a matter of dynamics. It follows that, if nevertheless this distribution tends to be favorable to survival, the self-
This
my
main
From
its
self-maintenance.
we
point.
here,
formulated as follows.
If,
149
ties are
in the
system
the organism
is
and when at times it spends more than it gains, events soon take
a turn by which the loss is balanced, if not overbalanced. Neverno serious difficulty arises at this point, because the dievents take in open systems need not be the same
which
rection
as that which they take in closed systems. In fact, events in some
theless,
first
weak flame
is
in contact
150
an organism
is
fully developed, it
maintains
its
vigor so far as
circumstances permit?
must confess
it is,
for
them against
may
may main-
tain themselves in states of high vigor, but that they need not,
and do not, do so under all circumstances. What, then, are the
way
in
much when we
latter.
Many
physicists are
tions.
It should not
now
be
difficult for
them
to discover under
what
many
processes
151
tools of physics.
But
it
at the present
Is the Concept of an
Organism
RASHEVSKY
effects in
our mental
efforts,
152
To
give an example,
let
nomena from
known
us consider a generally
if
case
all
known
physical phe-
negligible as
On
'
if
we accept
Each physical
another important criterion by which the contemporary scientist judges the usefulness or convenience of a theory or
There
is
theoretical concept.
A theory
or theoretical concept
it
is
considered
enables us to predict
may have
relativity,
by means
of
It
is
these predictions?
What
is it
How
make
153
As
however,
scientists,
poetical explanation,
we can
is
more prosaic
scientific.
we examine
by means
of which vari-
ous predictions in the natural sciences have been made, we findthat their mechanism works in the following manner. The scientist constructs theories, theoretical concepts,
or theoretical frames
come true
is
Whether
this
dream
will ever
But the
first
phenomena
of phe-
154
Most
you doubtless have seen various ancient geographic maps, for instance, maps used by the ancient Greeks or
Romans. The general outlines of the Greek peninsula and of the
point.
of
those limits
A map
is
many
ancient
maps
it
less
Beyond
still
isomorphic to the
symbolically represents. Thus within the
it is
map would
all sorts
be utterly useless,
of "unpredicted" surprises.
It should
scientist
155
conceptual framework
as developed
is offered by the
theory of random nets,
by Anatol Rapaport and his students in connection
Now
let
ism and the machine. From the old point of view, we could have
asked the question: Is the organism a machine or not? That
such a question
this example.
is
The answer
tions of the
satisfies all
the crite-
we
Doubt-
an organism.
If
an organism.
We
also
would
and there
is still
defined a machine
somewhat
ator
was
implied.
differently,
speaking of a contrap-
156
let
us
by
scientific
creator for
any organism.
we
shall
have
left
the domain of
less
is
in the negative.
We
shall
now
We
crude analogy has been noticed between the heart and the
vascular system on one hand, and a pump and system of
pipes
on the other. On the basis of this crude
analogy some equally
crude quantitative relationships have been deduced. Crude as
more
refined relationships
A
ment
particularly interesting example is offered by the developof various electronic computors. These machines
perform
complex tasks that hitherto have been the function of certain
puters are,
157
electronic
com-
with respect to
human
their functions,
isomorphic with a
brain.
ask whether
may
We
legitimately
this
in
sistor is structurally
a computer and different elements of the brain, an isomorphism, or rather a homeomorphism, is at hand. Studies in the
3f
mathematical biology of the central nervous system have sometimes proved useful in the design of some machines. Conversely,
the designers of the electronic computers
may
give
some highly
The
third example
is
from a
field of
mathematical biology to
quadrupeds as a
beam supported
;>ver-all
all
One
is
156
let
us
organism
is
we should
ing that
we must
It is clear that
ascertain,
by
scientific
we
shall
have
left the
domain
of
Thus
in
approach
is
shown
to be use-
From
we may,
swered either
is
We
shall
now
show by several examples that within a small, sharply circumscribed range, the answer to the question is Yes.
We
shall also
machine
A crude analogy has been noticed between the heart and the
vascular system on one hand, and a pump and system of pipes
on the other. On the basis of this crude analogy some equally
crude quantitative relationships have been deduced.
Crude as
more
refined relationships
have been derived, and the agreement between theory and experiment has been considerably improved.
ment
is
158
pressions
mechanical structures
may
be quite useful.
How
approach be pushed? Only the future can tell. My personal feeling, and this is nothing but a feeling, with which anyone is just
as likely to agree as to disagree,
of biology, as, for example,
analogies are likely to prove very fruitful, I do not think that the
future of biology lies in too strong an emphasis of the analogies
seems to
a machine. Biology
is still
awaiting
its
Einstein,
who by a
stroke
matical structure.
Mysterium
159
of Sinful
Iniquitatis
Man
WARREN
S.
McCULLOCH
said,
retorted,
Euler's proof happened to be correct, and the observations inaccurate. Had both been right, far from proving God's superiority
to logic, they would have impugned his wit by catching him in a
Our
contradiction.
first
concern
is
such solecisms.
us.
Few chem-
constituents.
The mathematics
is
too
cumbersome.
Physics
160
explicatio
Instead
futile as it is profane.
"God"
we
as
purposes.
enough to
of
show
that,
if
his
miracle.
It
is
for mathematics.
metaphors
a homolog, whereas the
elastic ether's
being chimerical
left
Max-
all
He
looked
on the evolution of the nervous system, on its ontogeny, on learning, even on reflexes, as spontaneous variants that survive in the
competition to trap available energy and thus secure energetic
in the entropic degeneration of sunshine to the
Lebensraum
ways
if
you
of thinking
161
whims
But most people have heard of cybernetics from Norbert Wiener or his followers. Narrowly defined, it is but the art of the
helmsman, to hold a course by swinging the rudder so as to offset
any deviation from that
course.
For
this the
helmsman must be
back"
helmsman. The
flexes
intrinsic
to the
may
be
theory of information.
The circuit in a servomechanism
may
include, as
we
hold
it
showed that one having a finite number of parts and states, scanning, marking, and erasing one of four symbols at a time on an
infinite tape, can compute any computable number. The first part
of the tape serves to prescribe which number his general machine
showed that brains were Turing machines, and that any Turing machine could be made out of neurons. For this we used a calculus of atomic propositions subscripted for the time when all-or-none impulses signalized them
shall compute.
Pitts
and
is
the anatomy
of their connections.
162
calculus
by
any
Memories, general
the
idea of ideas, can
ideas,
Spinozistic consciousness,
thus be generated in robots. These robots, even simple ones hav-
and even
anomaly which
contra Plato
precludes a
common measure
of
"the good."
chess
Ashby would have it, but that they may learn the rules of the
game when these are given only ostensively. This insures their
ability to generate their own ethic not merely to be good, like
as
the virtuous savage, because they are so made that they cannot
break the rules, nor, like the gospeled or inspired, because they
were so instructed by their fellows or their creator. Unlike solitaire, chess can be enjoyed only by a society of men or machines
whose desire to play exceeds their desire to win. This is easily determined by connecting their two feedback loops in such a way
that the former dominates the latter. I grant that these complicated machines resemble the elephant or some other "Colossus of
ants, within whose "narrow engines there
that
we can
more fun than chess, is enough to prove that man's moral nature
needs no supernatural source. Darwin observed, but Spencer
failed to note, that success in the game of life, and so
survival,
is
Neumann
suggests that
make
we
are familiar only with simple maonly simpler ones, so that we suppose this
others
still
make
168
own
tape,
like itself.
NH
polypeptides from amino acids. When he makes proby sticking these together he can better estimate the probain evolutionary epochs. If
bility of their formation by chance
the civility of these little citizens only sets forth an evolved effi-
has
made
teins
What? From
we may
Maker:
insensate nothing to evoke
them
bits of information
kind of
Charles Peirce first defined "information," his "third
"
the
which
in
'the sum of synthetical propositions
quantity," as
-.
tr
Of
164
Peirce's friends,
chance. Perhaps a
New
England conscience
may
afford freedom
only to
mercy
seat.
whereby to
fills
of these cir-
us to package in a head
the nose of a V-2 rocket. But given miniature efficient
what
The components
and
inefficient for
we
Were
of sustained reception.
life,
only 10
human memory
is
second
10 times
trace in
bits per
half a day,
bits.
it
over
Hence a man
will
if,
by regenerating
traces,
we
retained some
165
5 per cent of
makes the thing we are to seek in a given brain and its multiple
locations depend upon the sequence of its learnings.
To the theoretical question, Can you design a machine to do
whatever a brain can do? the answer is this: If you will specify
in a finite and unambiguous way what you think a brain does do
and
mean
we do
in
date bore witness to what he also bore witness to as having happened then and there. Of course we can make machines do that.
reflective circuitry.
ment by
is
The
it
was he him-
physiologist
would have
mean
"responsiveness to
present stimulation with a lag called latency" a trait that few
things lack! but a psychoanalyst explained to me that "a padefining "consciousness" to
tient is conscious of
can verbalize
it"
what he once
which
is
felt
to say, "he
is
is
am
ghostly facade
is
To Helmholtz,
166
it
For
MacKay
the dis-
it yields
of the actor.
that
exists.
cient
It
mind or
self-suffi-
How-
and
all
So much
nism that
fits all
our data
is
is
to generate hypotheses.
one of an infinite
number
mecha-
of possible
This
is less
a matter of
sensibilities,
although
it lets
Each hypothesis predicts the outcome of numberless experiments. Hence, though no hypothesis can be proved, it may ultimately be disproved. A good one is so specific that it can be
disproved easily. This requires a minimum of logical, or a priori,
probability compatible with the data. I have sometimes boasted
that
my
167
Perhaps
of the mind.
Each impulse
an event.
propositions.
It
Were
truth of each and every one cannot be tested. The empiricist, like
the Thomist, must believe that God did not give him his senses
in order to deceive him.
Moreover man,
law
information
is
The
his input.
He
is
a sink
168
ken.
them
To demand them
is
is
the arrogance of
were very
u$ptq.
Obviously, he
he
may
never
know
So we
may
it.
Were
beyond his
come short of
fancy them known
Adam;
man; but
to
to
may know
it.
this otherwise,
conclude that
we
So long as we,
like
God has
of iniquity, of sinful
Chapter
Science as a Social and Historical
Phenomenon
Science
During
the
French Revolution
by
HENRY GUERLAC
Never
from Montesquieu and Voltaire to Condorcet and Volney. Inspired by the writings of Descartes and Newton, these men drew
confident arguments from the realm of physical law in their
many
172
What
is
difficult
to comprehend
Phenomenon
especially in
view of the
persistent tradition that the spirit of the Revolution was detrimental, if not actually antagonistic, to science is that this
scientific flowering
by the
was not
was
The
Na-
came
Yet we look
in vain for truly comparable achievemusic, or the belles lettres of this revolutionary period; and we are forced to the conclusion that the
national energy and the great social ferment that overthrew the
before.
ments in the
art, the
played a notable role in the intellectual preparation for the Revolution as well as in the seething
events of the Revolution itself. What this may have amounted
Science and
its practitioners
My
veal, perhaps
through
my own
errors, the
loss of
nouilli,
173
The
swiftly
moving events
was both a
and
fulfillment
a constitutional monarchy
found the
nor
unprepared. Having taken an active part in the liberal movement of the previous decades, they welcomed the first phase of
the Revolution with enthusiasm; indeed, men like Bailly, Condorcet,
about.
their
upon
it
he had performed his duties as president of the National Assembly; and later in the month the members of the Academy
went
in
in Chaillot to
pay
their
174
Phenomenon
Bastille the
Academy
Through-
out the remainder of 1789 and well into 1790, fundamental scientific questions continued to dominate the meetings of the
Academy
(I),
modeled upon the instrument with which the great English astronomer, William Herschel, was busy charting the nebulae and
observing the rings and satellites of Saturn (8)
But concern about the effect of the revolutionary tensions and
.
spondence
wrote to James Watt
(4)
is
While you are occupied tranquilly with science and the useful arts
which owe you such great obligations, we have been obliged to lose sight
of them. The ferocity of the great nobles, the insurrection of the citizens,
the fury of the people, the scourge of famine have absorbed all our attention; yet one must return to peaceful occupations, and one can be-
am
taking up
my
experiments
once more.
And
of
science
is
the loser.
May God
175
ahead (7):
The
it
memorandum on
and
in
May
mayor
of Paris.
The mathema-
Academy
of Science,
Guard.
176
Phenomenon
which aspired to
official
(8)
Briefly,
...
all
those being
may
perusal of this short-lived journal shows that, besides treatand abstract language such basic social
scientific
technology
(10).
ities of
efforts
had
earlier antecedents;
but above
all,
177
lacking in the Journal, the plans for new educational and sciensuch as those later elaborated by Talleyrand
and Condorcet.
is
tific institutions,
The philosophy
common
The
methodology.
is clearly discernible in
by Condorcet (11)
spirit and,
vision of
where
possible,
common
call sociology
There should exist for all societies a science of maintaining and extending their happiness: this is what has been called I' art social. This
science, to which all others are contributors, has not been treated as a
whole.
If
sci-
ences could be brought about, how the experimental and mathematical spirit of the natural sciences could be transferred to
the sciences of
man and
society, he
Stuart Mill, that it is enough to build aprioristic deductive systems in imitation of the great scheme of classical mechanics.
Condorcet placed his faith in what he called social mathematics,
and mathe-
matical probability, subjects to which he had contributed, together with Laplace and Lavoisier, in the years before the
Revolution. Just at this time he
ex-
178
Phenomenon
When a
sciences takes a
fact, to repair
selfish interests
and base
faith.
We
own
program that
war
demands of a
upon the Academy of
Sciences and its members left little time for normal activities.
By all odds the most time-consuming and exacting responsiof
in 1792, the
bility
overshadowing such requests as that the Academy examine and test silver vessels taken from ci-devant churches and
By
a decree of 8
May
merits.
the
179
Academy was
when
the
Academy was
to
of
announcing the subjects of annual prize contests (IS). A subject proposed for the year 1793 is of special interest. The prize
was to be awarded for the best theoretical analysis of the operation of steam engines, with a discussion of methods for their
improvement (14) surely one of the most important technical
problems of the time. No prize was actually awarded, although
it was again announced in 1793 for the year 1795, no memoirs
,
having been received, and the problem was finally attacked for
first time a generation later by Sadi Carnot, the son of the
the
man who
in these years
of the
Re-
publican armies.
During this crucial period the collapse and destruction of
many
had an equally
The Imprimerie
damaging
effect
de chimie, were suspended because of lack of funds or contributors. But the most serious blow was the suppression, in August
1793, of the venerable
Academy
of Sciences.
180
The
and
it
Academy's
here.
fall
Phenomenon
to preserve
past,
it
and as a "school of
servility
among them J.
members unmercifully
phleteers, chief
and
its
As
Academy
far as I
have been able to judge, the plan most widely favored for
example, by men like Talleyrand and Condorcet was to effect
a peaceable transformation of academies, including the Academy
more acceptable to the new
it
was hoped
to
made known that the academies were, of their own accord, reforming their statutes to put them in harmony with the new era and
erasing traces of their monarchical past. There
is
evidence thai
such a draft of new statutes was actually prepared by the Academy of Sciences, but it seems to have been without effect (16)
On 8 August 1793, Gregoire read to the Convention a report
h<
utility,
no mood
181
by
the painter Louis David, the Academy of Sciences was extinguished with the others. The members were even denied the
privilege of constituting themselves a Free Scientific Society
and
The
as
it
was by
inflation
The
and debate,
science,
which
Mme.
Roland, and
lesser enemies of Robespierre in the tumbrils of the guillotine.
The members of the General Farm, the tax-collecting corpora-
182
tion of the
fall of
1793, the
country
scientific
community stood
in appalled
(it
pleted his
of Paris,
Condorcet
these years.
which reached
scientists,
its
peak
in
moreover, can a
may
new
Decade
philoso-
Magasin encyclopedique there appeared, the year following the execution of the Farmers General, the first biographical sketch of Lavoisier, a factual but
moving account by his
long-time friend, the astronomer Lalande (27).
main feature
of
is*
made by means
rnenomenon
by the
Society, either in
...
This
is
genuinely active after Thermidor. It was frequented by the professors of the Museum d'Histoire Naturelle, which had early
made
its
by men
sci-
in 1792,
and in
A sfecond
and
its
distinctly
Memoires,
first
like
more important
scientific society
owed
Academy
in
of
and issuing
a regular publication. This was the Society Philomathique, which
Sciences)
or journal.
Its
Academy
of Sciences, dis-
186
works of his
Phenomenon
in publishing
In 1791 he
number
imprint: the
first
Dupont's
chimique
Antoine
Portal
by
two editions of Daubenton's Tableau
on tuberculosis (1792)
is
Academy
so listed in the
volume
for 1790.
Some
in this period
seem appropriate
here.
If
we
cite at
work
random, as
I did at the beginning of this article, the great names that illuminated these decades, we convey the impression of distinguished
scientific progress.
The
A closer examina-
years of the Revolution, perhaps to 1792, were still quite productive, because the momentum
of the previous years was not immediately arrested. The really
creative period of the
men who,
men
first
Monge,
Berthollet,
Monge
1789
and La-
falls in
the
187
Ecole de Mezieres. The monumental Mecanique celeste of Laplace did not begin to appear until 1799, but the work seems to
have been well advanced by 1790 and, but for the Revolution,
might have been completed much sooner. The same rule seems
to hold for Legendre's Essay on the Theory o/ Numbers (1794)
and his work on elliptic functions (1798) both of which grew out
,
of earlier work.
Those
who
made
pedagogic works
1800.
Mongers
is
on his teaching at the Ecole Normale and the Ecole Polytechnique. Laplace's famous Essai
later books of Lagrange, based
ample
is
of Euclid.
teme du monde,
markedly
different
from the
century.
new
chemistry.
The pioneer
new
orientation.
188
The
naturalists of the
Museum,
chief
Phenomenon
who
called
Lamarck, a man
case.
of fifty
quent years he did his best and most famous work, developing his
theory of biological evolution and collecting the materials for
his pioneer descriptive treatise of invertebrate zoology (18151822).
That science
lost
much
tended to accomplish is
of leading Academicians on the eve of the Terror.
Had
the
and projects
we
creative energies
had
in
he was
lost to science,
no sense
out,
flagged.
and
if
He was
At the time
forty-six
was preparing
a fundamental revision of his Traite elementaire de chimie and
incalculable.
of his imprisonment he
in
looked,
makes
189
men
old enough
and questions
of social utility.
Those men of
science,
for politics.
It
was as
politicians, financiers,
men
of science.
crisis
and new
scientific institutions.
still
felt it
further the
had no need
Notes
1.
2.
3.
190
4. J.
vol.
5.
6.
n,
Phenomenon
1844),
p. 228.
2,
7. J. Pigeire,
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
cit.,
p. 393.
13.
14.
This prize of 1080 livres, the Prix Montyon, for the best memoir tending
to simplify the processes of some mechanical art had been awarded in
1792 to a M. Girard, an engineer of Poitiers, for his study of the best
method of constructing locks for canals and harbors. See Prix Propose
par rAcademie Royale des Sciences, Pour I'annee 1793, 2 pp., de Plmprimerie de Dupont, Imprimeur de TAcad&nie des Sciences, 1792
(Collection de Chazelles, Bibliotheque de Clermont-Ferrand).
15.
16.
When this paper was delivered, the existence of these new statutes was
a mere surmise. After a search in the records of the Academie des
Sciences, in the summer of 1954, two working copies were discovered.
These regulations were debated for nearly 6 months and were finally
approved by the Academy on 13 Sept. 1790; they were never officially
promulgated or printed.
It is more likely that Condorcet died of a circulatory disorder
brought
about by fatigue, exposure, and hunger. See J. S. Schapiro, Condorcet
(New York,
17.
Maoasin encyclopedique
5,
174 (1795).
Notice sur
la vie et les
191
L'An Quatrieme,
19.
20.
1795).
Memoirs
of Science
&
I,
pt. II, p.
On
21.
Memoires de
la
(Paris, Prairial
An
VII, 1799), see especially pp. iii-ix. The activities of this society
can be followed in the Magasin encyclopedique from 1795 onward.
de la societe philomathique,"
philomathique a I'occasion du centenaire de sa fondation, 1788-1888 (Paris, 1888), pp. i-xv. For the constituent articles and the list of early members, see the Rapports generaux
des travaux de la Societe philomathique de Paris (Paris, n.d., 1800?).
23. See his prospectus entitled Imprimerie de Dupont Depute de Nemours
a I'Assemblee Nationale, dated 8 June, 1791 (Bib. Nat. Vp 21199). An
English version of this document is published in B. E. du Pont, Life of
la Societe
Eleuthere Irenee du Pont from Contemporary Correspondence (Newark, Del., 1923), vol. I, pp. 141-145.
24. See B. E. du Pont, op. cit., vol. I, p. 185, note 1.
25. Dupont's undated Notice sur institution de la Societe philomathique,
an 8-page pamphlet, probably dated from the period of the society's
rapid expansion, 1792 or 1793. A copy of this was found among the
Lavoisier papers (dossier 162) in the Archives de I'Academie des
sciences.
26.
M. Dumas,
"L'elaboration
du Traite de chimie de
Lavoisier," Archives
XXIX,
pp. 570-590).
192
Phenomenon
ALEXANDRE KOYRE
It
is,
indeed,
my
193
dominated our thinking for about three centuries, roughly speaking, from Galileo to Einstein and Planck.
From our
can be characterized as
bound
to-
Some
of the moderns, especially philosophers and psychologists, go so far as to tax Aristotle's reasonings as infantile
and attribute to him the mental age of a child of twelve.
tation.
is
to be explained only
by
This, in my
the continuity of the anti-
science
who
and which
modern
world, which
additions
What
ridicule, indeed,
194
Phenomenon
its weight, or
naturally without being
dragged or pushed from outside, for his belief that circular mo-
was a particularly
tion
move
bodies could
interesting
We know
much more
right than he
knew
himself.
As
and
is
it;
is
of bodies, as
we know
full
well since
is
world-space
Now
is
is
all
"inside."
this is precisely
what
somewhat
clumsily, because he
did not have at his disposal the resources of Riemannian geomAristotle has been teaching us. Outside the world, he said,
etry
there
is
The
that
is,
all
the places
is inside.
Aristotelian conception
is,
it is,
Phenomenon
195
and finite though boundless universe, are wont to point out that
they are dealing with difficult mathematical conceptions, and
that those of us who are not sufficiently trained and who lack
ability in
mathematical thinking
stand them.
They
will
Yet
it is
perhaps
fail to
and who could not rise above the level of geometric imagining,
could not understand Aristotle; they would continue to ask:
What is outside the world? What will happen if we push a stick
through the surface of the ultimate heavenly sphere?
The real difficulty of the Aristotelian conception solved
ulti-
Einstein
geometry
is
not a fundamental
<:C(>tion,
On
who
believed in mathematics
in sense perception,
tried to
(%<i>pa),
much more
difficult.
It
196
Phenomenon
Plato himself.
It
seems to
me
geometry made
real,
totelian science
it
was based on
dynamics.
After all, bodies really fall when they are heavy and rise when
they are light; and the principle of inertia, according to which
bodies
when pushed
on experience, which
constantly disproves this principle. Inertial motion, indeed, not
The
it is
even
be asserted
and the world revealed by the Paloby no means greater than that of the Greeks.
mar
reflector is
Yet the
is
implied
by
its
The
less
new
science,
(i)
such as
than precise,
(ii)
Phenomenon
197
bo infinity,
inertial
motion
that
is strictly
and
rigorously impossible.
The
(physical)
science.
The
birth of
modern
science
is
work
of
human
that
it is
that
is,
Thus
it is
Giordano Bruno
is
know
take,
of
Maxwell
results.
Fifteen years ago, I called the revolution of the 17th century "la revanche de Platon." But, as a matter of fact, it
was an
alliance,
an
198
Phenomenon
The enemies
Commander
of
France
allied himself
of the Faithful.
Or
to
it
to be able to notice
its
strange-
whose material elements, objects of a theoretical extrapolation of the experience, swim or are immersed, without beness)
ing affected by
it,
a real
lectual knowledge. One understands therefore the rigorous mutual implication of this absolute, or of these absolutes absolute
rest.
we can
Phenomenon
199
A f Kant
who
largely misinterpreted
it
but opened a
in spite
way
to a
.ew epistemology
cience
/hat determines
(or cannot}
make
it
it is
faculties of
the contrary,
which of our
accessible to us.
and
in
Newtonian
science, it is not
is
the
modern
sci-
measure of things.
The
is
torum. At least not yet, though to judge by some recent publications, it is on the way to becoming just that.
the prevailing trend of interpretation is somewhat differand modern science is, as often as not, and even more often
than not, presented as an example the example of cmpiricisl
Still,
ent,
or positivist epistemology.
Phenomenon
201
tion, are,
Thus
it is
tic science of
To
Two
Laplace and the Mecanique analytique of Lagrange, its phenomenalistic aspect is much less apparent: as a matter of fact it is
not the phenomena, but the noumena or the noeta that find themselves bound together by the causally unexplained or even unexIndeed, not bodies of our common-sense world,
but abstract, Archimedian bodies of the Galilean one, or the
the
particles and atoms of the Newtonian world, are the relata or
plainable laws.
fundamenda
by modern
science.
The
science
positivist interpretation or self -interpretation of
Duhem,
after others,
the
Phenomenon
202
purpose of astronomical science, Alexandrine astronomers explained, is not to find out the real mechanism of planetary motion but only to aco^etu TCC 9acv6pieva, to save the phenomena by
putting together a system of circles a purely mathematical device enabling us to calculate and predict the position of the
planets, and thus establish a connection between the data of
previous and future observations.
It is
used by Osiander
it
was against
AITIOAOrETOS
work and
calls
non
He
a causal science.
Malebranche.
Indeed, the Newtonian attitude concerning the problem of attraction is incompatible with the positivist point of view. For,
from
Newton
so strongly opposed,
just as unobjectionable as
Mach
is
radically,
have made
is
any
W. Bridgman
it
to be
perfectly
bound by
prejudice.
As a matter
Phenomenon
203
Action at a distance, even for those of the Newtonians who, following Cotes, accepted it as a physical force, has always been
as something strange and difficult to admit an absurdity
which
one gets accustomed remains nevertheless an absurdto
and it is this conviction, which, by the way, could make an
ity
felt
work
spired the
of Euler, of
finally
that of Einstein, who, by joining together the disconnected elements of the Newtonian world, space and matter, eventually
solved the riddle.
So
it
seems to
it
me
number
of others,
nical
inspiration
the
post-Newtonian development of
scientific
Thus
nation,
I believe that
least, that:
is
on
it
ceases to
make
virtue of necessity
and congratulate
laws.
who
but
son,
its
And
recognize that
also,
man
is
it
not only
know but
to understand.
is in
i;Sov Xo-ftx6v,
man
a being of rea-
204*
Phenomenon
Zeitgeist
in Scientific Creativity
by
EDWIN
BORING
G.
This "magic" term Zeitgeist means at any one time the climate
it affects thinking, yet it is also more than that, for
of opinion as
the Zeitgeist
affects
is
if
the thinker
whom
it
it
and implicit
same time
ruling out
in those cases
it is.
where plagiarism
No man
clearly under-
of one's
own
ideas.
it
On
the other hand, this conception long anteessence of Tolstoy's argument in 1869
was the
that "a king is history's slave" whose conscious reasons for action
are trivial and unimportant. Charles Darwin, Herbert Spencer,
all
Phenomenon
more
voluntaristic views of
some
lesser writers.
Thomas
205
and
Newton on the
electricity.
The
sociologists
Ogburn
contemporaneous but
Since
inventions.
discoveries
or
you cannot in these
independent
pairs assume that one man got the crucial idea from the other,
list
of 148
same climate
was doing
appeal to
a maturing Zeitgeist
dence
is
of opinion.
each
Some such
(#)>
Now
how, we
may
Today the
Zeitgeist
an immortal consciousness
say
it is
206
men
other
communication
of
That
always hard to be
is
by the thinking of
communicated to him.
affected
is
man
Phenomenon
in science,
which both
original, to
make
progress in a minority
originality.
On
living
We
if
wrong
it
men
own
contempt
and
the smile
affected also
by its
him-
The
by
single investigator
insight,
known
The maze
is
net
And
an
its trial
may
down
it is
all.
it is
An
not immediately
error for the rat.
it,
chooses to go
come as the
brilliant
>f its
mean merely
Phenomenon
207
motives.
>ase his
and communication
is vital in
modern
is
impor-
science. Nevertheless
remains possible to regard the single scientist as an organic system, as a discovery machine, with a certain input from the literait
bure
of social
is
experiment. There
we
discoveries
and communication
for
an individual's
bounded on
its
sides
by
is
it
is
would make
Hitler's effect on
German
science
Geister.
istic,
would
208
Phenomenon
certainly
science,
Nowadays
havioristic.
one's lips
and there
is
on every-
is
senschaften.
Zeitgeist changed. Mind gave way
This transition was eased by the positivists whc
supplied the transformation equations from the old to the new
transformations by way of the operational definitions of experi-
to behavior.
It is
enough
And
oi
minded scientists, choose a physicalistic definiOur predecessors in 1900 would not so easily
We
wisdom
of the age.
Nor
is
my
years believed firmly in the existence of my own private immediate consciousness. Then, about 1930, en route to Damascus, as
it
to
know
knew that
was unconscious
have experience
it.
Introspection
is,
consciousness
is
as
much
One
is
Phenomenon
209
exactly then
The
sometimes
helping and sometimes hindering. There can be nothing surprising in such a statement. Forces in themselves are not good or
bad. Their effects can be, depending on what it is you want.
is
men
great
the collision of
Most
now think not, yet these men point in selfwho also resisted the Zeitgeist (5). This
because it is well to know and respect the wisdom
of us right
defense to Galileo
dilemma
arises
of the ages
is
and
adequate. If
weighed in balances,
also to correct it
ress
of science?
1}
It is plain
whether
it
There
is
Zeitgeist to that
it,
knowl-
210
cannot be kept.
ment leads
One
The law
On the
is
all
the
of multiple proportions
and
other hand, the Zeitgeist does not always help, for there
it
The
It is useful to
century. It
was not a
is
It
silly idea.
can see colors, can you not? And white is a color. And you can
see that it is simple and not a mixture, can you not? It is not
clear
just stubborn,
his
made
But Robert
Hooke and the others at the Royal Society would have none of
They were restrained from belief by the Zeitgeist. White
it.
is
obviously not colored, not a mixture. There was bitter controversy before the conventional scientists gave in, before the truth
shifted over to Newton's side (6)
difficulty
move with
it.
Phenomenon
211
The
is still
another ex-
on progress in
ample
thought. Here both Lavoisier and Priestley broke away from
convention enough to discover oxygen, but Lavoisier, with the
more negativistic temperament, made the greater break and
came
science
way
to push
it is.
hinders,
The
history of science
is full
of instances
of all four.
2)
help
scientific
techniques. The telescope seems to have come out of the Zeitgeistj for it was invented independently by half a dozen different
for
mag-
So
it
mass of valid
research.
212
measure
maze
in 1903, in order to
its
maze
as
mistaken for
little.
For a couple
of decades investi-
gators reported facts about the octave above 20,000 cycles per
second, an octave that
is
really inaudible.
edge about the whistle led to confusion and hindered the advance
of science.
3)
The
human
thinking.
It
makes
continuous.
sensory quality.
Empedocles believed that eidola of objects are transmitted by
the nerves to the mind so that it may perceive the objects by their
images.
nerves to conduct the eidola. Then, under the influence of materialism, the animal spirits came to be regarded us a
spirits in the
viva and presently a vis nervosa. Next Johannes Muller, weing that every sensory nerve always produces its own quality,
vis
substituted for the vis nervosa five specific nerve energies, uwing
the word energy, in the days before the theory of conservation </
213
or their images, but only the states of the nerves that the
objects
affect, and he fought a battle against the Empedoclean
theory
as indeed had John Locke and Thomas
and Charles Bell
Young
connections are
made
eventuates
Nowadays
place where
and that sensory quality must be understood
or at least
many
which stimulation
we
fight
had
was
original,
perceives an object
object
itself,
by
simulacrum.
by embracing
mind
it, or, if it
by the
object's eidolon or
Nor has
remark: "If the lens of the eye inverts the image of the external
why do we not see upside down?"
and,
scientific film,
if
may
nowadays
manded
too.
it
in 1.690
one
Zeitgeist.
it
be grounded
214
Phenomenon
prejudices that
are loyalties.
Every
scientific
in-group with
When two
and then
it
is
so
So egoism
and exaggera-
may
yield 'un-
dethrone-
own
and
communication
drives, to lessen
and the
law.
siasm
Attention to this
is
is
enemy
Enthu-
of wisdom. Science
diffuse,
215
and he has to
sell
in order to buy,
and he
may
never
know
for posterity,
all,
effect of prejudice
and
intolerance, as
man
ever can in
himself.
Coda
a broad meaning for the word Zeitgeist the total body
of knowledge and opinion available at any time to a person liv-
This
is
is,
certainly,
no rigorous way
The
and
is
communicated whenever
it
becomes
Zeitgeist is a
That paradox is
and
its
allowable
We need
pervading and controlling the immortal body of society.
from
abstinence
this
mystery reno such nonsense, even though
duce us to so ordinary a concept as a Zeitgeist inclusive of all
available knowledge that affects a thinker's thinking.
That such a
hinders
it
Zeitgeist
216
Phenomenon
specific goal.
The
Zeitgeist hindered
Newton's day. Did the Zeitgeist that Newton knew help relativity theory? No; relativity had to make its way against that
Zeitgeist. The newest Zeitgeist, which will include the principles
and after
much
later,
The term
2.
brought about "neither by agreement nor fiat." See, for instance, Goethes
samtliche Werke, (I. J. Cotta, Berlin, 1902-07), vol. 38, p. 78.
The discussion of this paragraph and all the references will bo found
in extenso in E. G. Boring, "Great men and scientific progress," Proc.
Am. Phil Soc. 94, 339 (1950). The reference to Tolstoy is, of course, to
his
War and
list
tions
and
Am.
Phenomenon
21T
Kennedy,
C. Payne-Gaposchkin, T. M. Riddick, and E. G. Boring, "Some unorthodoxies of modern science," Proc. Am. Phil Soc. 96, 505 (1952).
On Newton's difficulty in changing the Zeitgeist with respect to the
complexity of white, see E. G. Boring, Sensation and Perception in the
Phenomenon
218
History of Science
by
ROBERT
S.
COHEN
In proposing several general questions on the social and historical aspects of science, I
plausible
(Jf).
The achievement
science
is
science.
As
(nonscientific) influences
is
on the de-
and
theories.
be involved in the selection of epochs or regions to be investigated, yet there is a major fact-finding job for the student of
the history of science. Utilizing these results, as well a those
may
may
its
mutually
effective relations
with
And we may
219
tory of the social relations of science. I can only regret that the
sociology of knowledge, and especially of science, has remained
so long outside that movement's sweep, and so largely in the
work
(2) trag-
ically incomplete.
essential testing
ground of certain
namely the
effect of
And
ities of
want
to suggest
of these writers
would
which, because
it is
I
suggest certain problems and points of departure (5). Then
conshall briefly apply this scheme to two particular scientific
cepts.
The impacts
of the sciences
220
direct
and
indirect.
I will, in
view of
Phenomenon
this,
turn
my
attention to
of science in
some
as they do:
(i)
what we want
to
know about
the state
namely,
why
societies
and
cepts
why
why
and
(vi)
why
v)
a mode of
Likewise
it
is
which
may
There
is
another
way
we
(i)
those in-
group. Those
who have
explored the external factors have suggested a wide variety of social influences on science: the influence
mi
Max
3.
F. Mason,
3! social institutions
Mumford
Thorstein Veblen,
Max
J.
Karl Marx (8) the distortion of political instiand misconceptions of other sciences K. Popper, M.
logic reflections
tutions
Polanyi, F.
into nature
Hayek
(9)
G. Bachelard (11).
All of these have been documented sufficiently and
we may now
for
a specific
among the
about the apprehension of nature or of Freud's irrational determinants, or of the others, need to be put to a test which is some;
By
what
different
mean
We
offer.
this I
222
Phenomenon
undoubted relations
many
have just
listed
the
life,
Thus
strictive
its
own
is
right,
with
its
own demand
for
religious
(Of course,
if
the history of
the puzzle
(18).
As
seemed to a later
scientist only to
add to
Phenomenon
have
human
can
we
protect scientific
may
;
exist in
and we are
How
223
knowledge from
human
its
culture.
varied his-
torical origins
by
If
we
we must
can be
recognize that:
filtered
may
Zeitgeist;
(iii)
all
the
We
have, then, to distinguish three stages in the social influencing of scientific ideas: (i) the problem that is attacked; (ii)
the ideas and techniques brought to bear on it; and (iii) the
principles of verification that the society, as part of its culture,
provides.
To
as
much
from
its
own
sociocentric predica-
and the
by the second,
it is only
a hypothesis that such self-knowledge would release a greater
science than the past, in the sense that, perhaps prior knowledge,
even self-knowledge, may at times be insufficient or unnecessary
My
act in two ways. In the first place, they are obviously sufficient
224
to pose problems
it
utterly.
and
Phenomenon
is
less evident,
they are
The development
and
of
briefly.
of the first
and by 1843 the juggling of these ideas into a mechanical equivalent of heat had occurred. Mayer, as a ship's doctor, found in
1841 a need to suppose a mechanical equivalent of heat in disHe used Lavoisier's
viewed
it
as a furnace or
fire.
the steam
kinetic energy)
stance.
yet
it
seemed so natural
cultural climate
was
offered
in 1840 as itself to
by Rumford
in 1798,
Rumford, while
Phenomenon
225
by nonscientists
which made possible the new explanation. Actually
the explanation was couched in almost metaphysical language
and in highly a priori terms; this is surely a sign that it was
Zeitgeist
is
notorious
namely why
supreme
is
in the ancient
The
cods).
But the
By
men and
226
200
B.C.,
Phenomenon
would continue
composed
of
many
this conception
in the
Roman
empire,
cultures
all
was, broadly, a Roman commonplace. (Again the supreme lawgiver of ancient Judaism and later Judeo-Christian ethical re-
naturalistic Democriteans
In
all these,
the laws of
man and
image
of nature are
obey their
with God's.
human
In modern science, the natural law as metaphor became explicitly so by the seventeenth century (and distinguished from
the
first
separation
into
will that
world, the irregular occurrences, for example comets and monsters. Now, after Descartes he is the lawgiver for the regular
occurrences.
political
and
Again the
social
is
new
centralized nation-mon-
model
Descartes' idea of
God
As
Zilscl
pointed out,
The conception
227
states, languished
tional relations
new
of capitalist interna-
states, attaining
naturalistic revival.
a meta-
Of course
this
and
of
have
The only
by
The
Zeitgeist of
of
tell
really necessary to
whether
have natu-
228
Phenomenon
am
indebted to the Faculty Research Committee of Wesleyan Univerwhich helped make possible the studies in the history
method/'
ibid. 2, 1 (1941);
;
work by R.
3.
by a
critical
study of his
S.
Some
and
if
this
on the
he
rise of
Phenomenon
229
3. Singer,
published (Oxford Univ. Press, 1954) and vol. 2, The Mediterranean Civilization and the Middle Ages will appear shortly; J. D.
Bernal, Science in History (Watts, London, 1954) J. Needham, Science
and Civilization in China, to appear in 7 vols., of which vol. 1, Intro;
ductory Orientations, and vol. 2, History of Scientific Thought (Cambridge Univ, Press, 1954 and 1956 respectively) have been published;
and Science, Medicine and History: Essays in Honor of Charles Singer,
2 vol. (Oxford Univ. Press, 1954).
Needham's great work, just noted, is of interest as a comparative
study of science in advanced cultures just as much as a lavish study of
science in China; it will serve to adjudicate the claims of the various
interpretations of the history of science mentioned in the present paper.
M. Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, tr. Par-
sons
ligion
orig.
Braziller,
N.
Y., 1955;
L. L.
of
230
Phenomenon
tit. U), and also see his From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology
(Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1946) Lewis Mumford, Technics and
Civilization (Harcourt, Brace, New York, 1934).
J. S. Haldane, The Sciences and Philosophy (Macmillan, London,
op.
7.
1926)
J.
Wisdom (Bles, London, 1944) E. Meyand Reality (Allen and Unwin, London, 1930); E. A.
erson, Identity
Modern Physical
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, The German Ideology and also
passages in Marx's Capital, vol. I (International Pub., Now York, 1939)
J. D. Bernal, The Social Function of Science (Routledge, London, 1939),
and Marx and Science (Lawrence and Wishart, London, 1952) B. Hes"
in Science
sen, "The social and economic roots of Newton's Trincipia'
at the Crossroads (Kniga, London, 1931)
A. R. Hall, Ballixtiw in the
Seventeenth Century (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1952), a careful examination of the relations of science and war technology, which
tends to confirm BernaFs cautious formulations of the Marxist thesis
while casting doubt on the cruder work of Hessen, G, N. Clark, Srinnre
and Social Welfare in the Age of Newton, ed. 2 (Oxford Univ. Prows,
Oxford, 1949), a critical study of the Marxist thesis. It .should, perhaps,
be noted that the Marxist theory of scientific knowledge does not
;
relegate all knowledge in capitalist or earlier societies to Homo ideological limbo of illusion, although the theory does imply that all knowl-
edge
is
and hence
in.
it,
illusions as contrasted with the objective truths in a historically classsponsored system of knowledge. The general view is that farts and
mathematical formulas (to use the science of physics) are objoHiv**, but
that the interpretation of the symbols tends to bo ideologically distorted, for example the formulas of quantum mechanics as contrast IT!
with the Bohr interpretation. For a popular provocative fssay on this,
Phenomenon
231
and Carnap's
9.
Press, Glencoe,
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
111.,
1952).
15.
376 (1949).
This section
is
op.
cit.
(10)
E. V. Arnold,
Cambridge, 1911)
1950,
Human Law
232
Phenomenon
and History
Gustav Bergmann
Dr. Bergmann, who received his PhD. in mathematics at the University
of Vienna, has been connected with the State University of Iowa since
1939, and is at present professor of philosophy and psychology there. His
primary interest is in the theory of knowledge, but he has done much work
in the philosophy of science, particularly in the logic of psychology.
Edwin G. Boring
Dr. Boring was Director of the Harvard Psychological Laboratory, Cambridge, Massachusetts, for twenty-five years and at present is Edgar Pierce
Professor of Psychology at Harvard University. His books on the history
of experimental psychology
psychology are well known.
P.
and
his writings
on
theoretical
and systematic
W. Bridgman
Dr. Bridgman has been associated with Harvard University since his
entrance as an undergraduate in 1900. His principal scientific work has been
experimental, in the field of high pressure, and he has been concerned with
thermodynamics, and the critical analysis of the foundations of physics.
C. West Churchman
Dr. Churchman received his PhD. from the University of Pennsylvania
in 1938 and is at present professor of engineering administration at Case
Institute of Technology. He is the author of several books on measurement of consumer interest, the theory of experimental inference and methods of making experimental inferences, methods of inquiry, and phychologistic.
Robert
8.
Cohen
Dr. Cohfii
rnivwity,
thf*
is
in
KJw Fn'nkf'i-Bnmswik
Dr, Fn-nkf'1-Urun.swik has done research in psychology at the University
of Viffmn wiiw sho roc-rivm! her PhD. in 1930, and more recently at the
of California in Berkeley, where she is, at present, lecturer in
233
234
Adolf Oriinbaum
Dr. Griinbaum received his Ph.D. in philosophy from Yale and is now
William Wilson Selfridge Professor of Philosophy at Lehigh University,
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, and, in 1956-57, will be visiting research professor
at the University of Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science. He was
the recipient of Lehigh University's Robinson Award in 1953 for outstanding service.
Henry Guerlac
Dr. Guerlac, professor of history of science, Cornell University, trained
in biochemistry at Cornell and received his Ph.D. in European history
recent leave of absence was spent at the Institute for
at Harvard.
New
Jersey.
Carl G. Hempel
Dr. Hempel, professor of philosophy at Princeton University, studied
philosophy, mathematics, and physics at Goettingen, Heidelberg, Vienna,
and Berlin (Ph.D. 1934). He has written various articles in logic and
philosophy of science and is the author of Der Typusbegrifi im Lichte der
Neuen Logik (with Paul Oppenheim) and Fundamentals of Concept For-
Wolfgang Kohler
Dr. Kohler received his Ph.D. in psychology at Berlin in 1009, and has
been professor of psychology at Swarthmore College since 1935. He is
known for his work in perception, memory, and the pay ho logy of anthropoids other than man.
Alexandre Koyre
Dr. Koyre' has been professor at the Ecole Pratique de,s HauteB Etudes,
Sorbonne, Paris, France, since 1930, and has been a visiting professor at
Chicago, Johns Hopkins, and Wisconsin universities, and a member of
the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton,
R. Bruce Lindsay
Dr. Lindsay, Hazard Professor of Physics at Brown University since
1936, has recently been appointed Deun of the. Graduate School and is
also Director of the Ultrasonics Laboratory. Dr. Lindsay received his
training at Brown University and the MaHHurhuHettt* Institute of Technology, taking his PhD. in theoretical phymcH.
Warren S. McCulloch
Dr. McCulloch was educated at Yale,
versities,
and
is
now a
staff
member
New
search
where he condunfH
re-
236
B. F. Skinner
Dr. Skinner received his Ph.D. from Harvard University, where ho now is
professor of psychology. He in author of twvcni! books including tiricncc and
Human Behavior und a Utopian novel, WaUcn ?Vo. He luus fontnlnited to
the experimental analysis* of behavior through work with niJt* und pigeons,
and has recently extended his techniques to the huiuua organism in the
study of psychotic behavior.
INDEX
Abbe
Gregoire, 180
Abstraction: formalist, 33
Academy
Age
Age
29
of Enlightenment, 171
of Revolution, 171
ix, 39, 48, 5051, 53, 55-57, 67-68, 70-72, 74, 80,
84, 86, 89, 202
Brissot, 176
Browne, Sir
Arago, 172
Thomas, 159
of,
Atomic bomb, 27
Axiomatic
interpre-
in spiritual
beings,
10;
Thomas, 205
Carnap, Rudolf, 42, 59, 62, 99, 107
Carnot Sadi, 160, 172, 179, 224
Cauchy, 172
Causal effectiveness, 126
Carlyle,
in.
Bergman, 172
Bergmann, Gustav,
ix, 41
Bernfeld, Siegfried, 100
Bernouilli, Daniel, 172
Berthollet, Marcellin, 171, 174, 176,
182-183, 186
287
Censorship, 106
Chaptal, 175, 187
Churchman, C. West, viii
Clark, G. N., 221
Clifford, W. K., 68
Coeonscious, 116
x,
Common,
experience
sense:
218
of,
8,
9;
construction"
63
of,
70;
significant
scientific,
Condorcet,
182
171,
173,
175-178,
180,
240
Index
Lorentz:
transformations
of,
89;
of,
92
Lyce
Monge, Oaapard,
186
Montcaquieu, 171
de Paris, 183
Motivation,
Machines: inanimate,
computing, 162, 167
MacKay,
124
Miiller,
180.
184
166
Mysticism, 131
MacLaurin, 198
Magendie, 172
an a Machine, 12
Manhattan
109-111,
Motion:
Machine, 143-144,
103-104,
139
Mach, Ernst,
11
Project, 26
Manifestation, 111
Marat, J. P., 180
Margenau, Henry,
Newton,
209
ix, 39, 71,
80
Mariotte, 205
Maritain, Jacques, 221
Marx, Karl, 221
Nonsense,
13,
18,
41,
43,
44,
48;
Marxism-Leninism, 33
Northrop, F. S.
C., 221,
227
"Materialism," 16
Mechanism,
46,
133,
129,
160,
166,
Mehlberg, 86
Mental apparatus,
14,
17,
27, 40,
136
Meyerson,
E., 221
John
Stuart, 177
Mirabeau, 171, 176
Modern science: origin of, 193; leMill,
Moore, Barrington,
180;
approach, 39;
phenomen-
Jr., ix,
Operationism homocentric, 92
Operationist fashion, 49
Operations: paper and pencil, 39,
53, 70, 77-79; set of, 56; symbolic,
49, 53, 60; instrumental, 53-56, 70,
77-78; existential, 161
O'Rahilly, 9
:
Orthodoxy:
29
analysis,
52-57, 68-69,
Operationalism,
78, 80-83, 107
166
Method:
Mendel's laws,
Objectivity: scientific, 28
Ontological question, 43
Operational: meanings, ix, 54-55, 57;
official, 29,
Ostwald's energetics, 67
of,
32
145
Index
Fourcroy, 175, 182-183, 187
Frank, Philipp, viii, 07, 102, 108, 192
Frankenstein, 74
Frederick the Great, 173
French Revolution, 171-173
Frenkel-Brunswik, Else, x, 97, 117,
137
Fresnel, 172
Sigmund,
Freud,
115,
119-122,
112-113,
97-106,
124,
138,
methodological strategy
of,
126
172
Geisteswissenschaften, 208
Genesis, 11
Genetics, 30, 32-33
Geometrization of space, 193
sun," 5
Goethe, 204
Griinbaum, Adolf, 84
Guericke, 138
Guerlac, Henri,
Instrumentalist misinterpretation, 50
Instrumentalism, 50
Introspection, 119, 208
Isomorphism, 153-154, 157-158
Joshua, 5
Jung, C. G., 221
62
219
x, 171,
Guyton de Morveau,
viii, 165
Instrumental level, 71
Instrumental significance, 78-79
Kemeny,
Gestaltpsychology, x
Gilbert, William, 200
204, 221;
Galen, 213-214
Gay-Lussac,
239
175, 182
Lamarck,
Haldane,
J. S., 166,
221
Hassenfratz, 176
Hayek, F., 221
Hempel,
Laws: physical, 71
Lebensraum, 160
LeBlanc, 176
Hull, 106
Leibnitz, 205
Human
conduct: desirable, 14
Lenard, Philip, 9
Libido, 106
Index
240
transformations
Lorentz:
of,
89;
of,
186
Montesquieu, 171
92
Lycee de
Lyce
Monge, Gaspard,
Paris, 183
Motivation,
80, 82, 198, 202
147, 151, 155, 165-
Machine, 143-144,
Machines: inanimate,
computing, 162, 167
124,
Motion:
Miiller,
Museum
184
Mysticism, 131
166
MacLaurin, 198
Magendie, 172
Man a Machine, 12
MacKay,
Project, 26
Manifestation, 111
Manhattan
109-111,
139
Mach, Ernst,
103-104,
11
Newton,
209
ix, 39, 71,
80
43,
48;
Nonsense,
Objectivity: scientific, 28
Ontological question, 43
Operational: meanings, ix, 54-55, 57;
definitions, 13, 40, 48, 52, 55-56, 59-
13,
18,
41,
44,
62
60,
180;
approach, 39;
analysis,
166,
Meehl, 106
Mehlberg, 86
Mendelian genes, 166
Mendel's laws, 16, 166
Mental apparatus, 100, 116-118, 120-
Mechanism,
46,
129,
133,
160,
Method:
scientific,
14,
17,
27,
40,
136
Meyerson,
John
alistic
aspect
of,
Moore, Barrington,
Opcrationism : homoccntrxc, 92
Operationist fanhion, 49
Operations: paper and pencil, 30,
53, 70, 77-79; sot of, 56; symbolic,
49, 53, 60; inHtrumontal, 53-56, 70,
77-78; existential, 161
O'Rahilly, 9
E., 221
Stuart, 177
Mirabeau, 171, 176
Modern science: origin of, 193; legalistic aspect of, 201 ; phenomenMill,
Operationalisrn,
78, 80-83, 107
201
Jr., ix,
29
167-
Index
Page, W., 221
Pap, 47
Peirce, Charles
241
165
Philosophic trap, 43
Philosophy: idealistic, 12; of science, 48, 98, 177
Physics: of twentieth century, 17;
macroscopic, 151
Pike, 160
Pinel, Philippe, 173
Pitts, 161
Positivism phenomenalistic, 92
Pragmatics, 84-85, 92
Pragmatism, 18
Priestley, 211
Rudner, Richard, ix
Rumford, 224
Progress:
16
social,
16;
technological,
110,
112,
126,
129,
132,
200; positivis201; communication in, 206, 207; empiricism of, 207; impact of the social
order on, 220; social conditions
134-
tic
'
theory, 12, 33
Quastler, 163
of,
empiricism
narrow
pretation of, 97
Scientific ideas: social
of,
Quantum
Quantum
of,
interpretation
influencing
223
"Scientific reasons," 5
Seeger,
inter-
Index
242
Servomechanism, 161
Simplicity: perfect, 3-4, 13, 18, 82;
of the mathematical scheme, 4,
Simultaneity, 87-88, 90
Sin, 164
Unity of Science,
219
vii, 160,
185
vii,
viii;
Values, 22
Variables: intervening, 106-107, 130,
120, 124, 126, 133, 135
Sublimation, 101
Vauquelin, 184
Veblen, Thorstein, 221
Symbolism, 109
Symbols, 84-85
Vitalism, 148
27, 193
Verifiability
full,
63; partial, 63
observational,
tionist, 102;
ture of physical, 74
Theory: of gravitation, Einstein's, 4,
12; Copernican, 7; fertility of, 7;
of relativity, Einstein's, 12, 108,
152; purposes
of,
16; of relativity,
Can-
Riemannian, 91; of
instinct,
rela-
101;
226
Thermidor,
57-60;
introspec-
Freudian, 140
Volney, 171
Voltaire, 171
Wheetor, 163
Whitehcad, Alfred North, 221
Whye, Launcelot,
L.,
221
of,