List New2.ASP

Dated:17.04.
15
CERTIFICATEASTOCONDONATIONOFDELAY
This is to certify that HC Samarpal Singh No. 1956/East is

workingasNaibCourtintheProsecutionBranch,EastDistrict,KKDCourts,
Delhi.HeisworkinginveryheavycourtpertainingtomattersofPOCSOAct,
MCOCAandvariousothercases,so,heremainverybusyinthesaidcourt
and he was also suffering from Urinary problems, as well as having no
informationregardingrulesastosubmittingmedicalclaim.So,duetohis
official workload and illhealth, he could not furnish his medical claim
withintime.Therefore,Icondonethedelayinfurnishingmedicalclaimby
HCSamarpalSinghNo.1956/East.
(CHIEFPROSECUTOR)
EASTDISTRICT,KARKARDOOMACOURTS,DELHI
StateVs.JasbirSingh
FIRNo.711/14
PS.KrishnaNagar
U/s.420/34IPC
16.04.15
ThisisananticipatorybailapplicationunderSection438Cr.P.C.
Pr:
Sh.RakeshSatiyaLd.Counselforaccused/applicant.
ShMohd.TaufiqAhmed,LdSubstituteAddl.PPfortheStatealong
withIO/SIAbhijeetSingh.
Heard.
Keepinginviewtheentirefactsandcircumstances,Idirectthatin
theeventofarrestofapplicant,heshallbereleasedonfurnishingapersonal
bondinthesumofRs.20,000/withonesuretyinthelikeamount,tothe
satisfactionoftheIO/SHOconcernedandfurtherconditionisthatheshall
cooperateintheinvestigationfullyatanystageincludingTIP.
Applicationstandsdisposedoff.
ApplicationbeconsignedtoRecordRoom.
(SujataKohli)
ASJ01(E)KKDCourts/Delhi/16.04.15
s
StateVs.RekhaGupta
FIRNo.2157/2014
PS.Shakarpur
U/s.383/420/452IPC
16.04.15
Pr:
Sh.ManishBhadauriaLd.Counselforaccused/applicant.
withIO/SIYogesh.
Complainant/landlordisperson.
Heard.
ThisisananticipatorybailapplicationstronglyopposedbyLd.Addl.
PPfortheStateaswellasIOandcomplainant.
Thoughacivilsuitforevictionispending,nodoubt,thecriminalityof
theconductoftenant/accusedisthemaingrievanceofthecomplainantin
thepresentcase.
I have gone through allegations made in the FIR and also heard
complainantatlength.
IO submits that accused /applicant is not even joining the
investigation.
Inviewofincreaseof suchlikeseriousincidentsbetweenlandlord
and tenants, I do not deem it appropriate to extend the benefit of
anticipatorybailtotheapplicant.Applicationstandsdismissed.
Applicationbeconsignedtotherecordroom.
(SujataKohli)
s
StateVs.ArunChoudhary
FIRNo.381/14
PS.KrishnaNagar
U/s.365/506/120BIPC
16.04.15
Pr:
Sh.SunilLd.Counselforaccused/applicant.
withIO/SIPawanKumar.
ShSunilKalra,Ldcounselforcomplainant.
Ms.SheetalChaudhary,daughterofthecomplainant.
Heard.
Putupfororderson20.04.15at4.00PM.
Policefileberetainedforfurtherclarificationstillthenextdate.
(SujataKohli)
StateVs.Satish@Pintu&Others
FIRNo.212/13
PS.KalyanPuri
U/s.302IPC
16.04.15
Pr:
NonefortheState.
Sh.RoopRam,Ld.Counselforapplicant/accused.
Inspector/SHO Arvind Kumar is present along with status report
regardingthreatalleged.Reportrequiresfurtherconsideration.
Applicant/complainant in person. However, his counsel is not
available.
Inspector/SHO alsosubmitsthatinthemeantime,protectionhas
been provided to the complainant on each and every date from his
residencetocourtroomandback bydeputingoneBeatConstablealong
withthecomplainant.
AssuggestedbyLd.counselforaccusedonbailapplication,asright
now,aqueryhasbeenputtothecomplainantastowhetherhehasreceived
any threat from accused Sonu @ Bhenda @ Sohan @ Pola to which he
answeredinnegative.As such, nowbailapplicationpendingofaccused
Sonuistakenupforhearingat2.00PM.
(SujataKohli)
s
Pr:
ShDevenderKumar,Ld.Counselforcomplainantwithcomplainant.
Thegrievanceofthecomplainantstandsmetwithandapplicationof
thecomplainantforprotectionmaybedisposedofassatisfied.
StateVs.Suman
FIRNo.244/10
PS.Shakarpur
U/s.365IPC
16.04.15
PW5RetiredSIK.P.Singh,recalledforcrossexaminationafter2.09.14
ONSA
xxxxbySh.AkhileshKumar,ld.Counselforaccused.
IwassecondIOofthecaseandIhadconcludedtheinvestigation
andsubmittedthechargesheet.Isawaccusedandprosecutrixatfirsttime
at NizamuddinRailwayStation,facingthesideof SariaKaleKhanISBT.
WhenIsawthem theywerewalkingattheStation. Whentheywerefirst
seenbyme,theyhadalreadycomeouttheRailwayStation.Ihadfirstseen
themat8.30PM.IdonotrememberwhetherIhadfoundanybusticketor
train ticket in their search or their personal search. Vol. Whatever was
recovered is already a matter of record vide seizure memo or personal
searchmemo.IcouldmakeoutthattheyhadarrivedfromoutofDelhi,at
Delhi.Ihadrecordedstatementoftheprosecutrixandofotherwitnessesat
PSitself.Ihadnotvisitedthehouseofprosecutrixforrecordingstatement
ofanywitnessorforanyotherpurposeduringtheinvestigationstagebyme.
It is wrong to suggest that I have filed manipulated statements and
manipulated documents. It is wrong to suggest that accused has been
falsely implicatedinthiscase.Itiswrongtosuggestthat Iamdeposing
falsely.
(SujataKohli)
RO&AC
StateVs.Sudhir
FIRNo.498/13
PS.Gazipur
U/s.354/34IPC
16.04.15
Pr:
ShI.H.SiddiqueLd.SubstituteAddl.PPforthestate.
BothaccusedonbailwithSh.P.L.Behl,Ld.counsel.
Ms.SumanSharma,advocatefromDLSAisappointedaslegalAid
counselforvictimbycourt.
PW2 (victim) is present, examined from 12.50 AM to 1.30 PM and
discharged.
InthelightofstatementofPW2(Victim),whetherLd.Addl.PPforthe
Statewantstoexamineanyotherwitnessornot.SinceLd.Addl.PPforthe
Stateisonleave,matterisadjournedto25.04.15forconsideration.
(SujataKohli)
StateVs.Sameer
U/s.302/392/397IPC
PS.VivekVihar
FIRNo.72/2011
16.04.15
Pr:
NonefortheState.
Sh.A.K.Singhal,Ldcounselforapplicant.
Filetakenuptodayonapplicationfor preponment ofdateonbail
applicationofaccusedSameer.
Heard.
Originaldategiventhereinwas1.06.15.Itisnotedthatadjournment
hadbeensoughtonbehalfofLd.Counselhimselfvideproceedings07.04.15
datewasgiveninhispresence.
In view of the reasons stated and being it bail application,
applicationisallowedandoriginaldatestandscancelled.
Putupthebailapplicationon29.04.15.
(SujataKohli)
StateVs.Shokender@Hunny
PS.PreetVihar
16.04.15
Pr:
NonefortheState.
NBWissuedagainstaccusedwhowasearlierjuvenile andlateron
declaredadultreceivedbackunserved.FreshNBWofaccusedShokender@
Hunnybeissuedforthenextdate.
Putupon15.05.15.
(SujataKohli)
s
StateVs.MehmoodAlam
FIRNo.158/13
PS.MayurVihar
16.04.15
Pr:
NonefortheState.
Accusedisabsent.
Production warrants have been served but as per report, accused
MehmoodS/o.Sh.SarajuddinincaseFIRNo.158/13,underSection376(2)
I/366AIPCand6POCSOAct,PSMayurViharhasbeenreleasedfromjail
on18.09.13.
Accusedwasalreadyonbailinthiscaseandhasabsented. Surety
bondisforfeited.NBWbeissuedagainstaccused.Noticetosuretybealso
issued.
Putupforappearanceon1.05.15.
(SujataKohli)
s
StateVs.Suman
FIRNo.244/10
PS.Shakarpur
U/s.365IPC
16.04.15
Pr:
NonefortheState.
AccusedonbailwithSh.AkhileshKumar,Ld.Counsel.
PW5isrecalledforcrossexaminationanddischarged.Heisentitled
todietmoneytotheextentofRs.500/beingretiredofficialandhascome
fromBulandshahar,UP.
PreviouscostofRs.500/0alsostandsdepositedseparatelyonbehalf
oftheaccused.Onlytwowitnessesremaintobeexamined.Witnessatserial
No.5and6besummonedforthenextdate.
PutupforPEon16.05.15.
(SujataKohli)
s
RishiAgarwalVs.M/s.DriveIndiaEnterprisesSolutionsPvtLtd.
Crl.RevisionNo.23/15
16.04.15
Pr:
Sh.BrijeshKumarLdcounselfortherevisionist.
Fresh revision received by way of assignment. It be checked and
registered.
Applicationhasbeenfiledforexemptionfromfilingcertifiedcopyof
impugned order. However, same is rendered as infructuous as certified
copyoftheimpugnedorderstandsfiledtodayitself.Applicationisdisposed
of.
Preliminary hearing given on the revision. Main grievance of the
revisionist is that he had earlier stopped payment on same cheque in

questiontowhichnoticehadbeenreceived byhimand hehad issued
replytothe notice.However,therespondentstillrepresentedthecheque
for encashment after reply of the said notice. No fresh notice was ever
receivedthereafterbytherevisionistwithregardtothedishonourofcheque
onsecondoccasion.Thirdlyitisfurtherstatedthatrevisionist alreadyleft
the service of directorship of the company in question almost six years
back. LetnoticebeissuedtotherespondentonfilingPF,RCetcwithin
three working days. Till disposal of the revision petition, proceedings
before Ld. Trial Court shall remain stayed. Trial Court Record be
summoned.
Putupon16.05.15.
CopyofthisorderbegivenDastitold.Counselfortherevisionist,as
prayedfor. Copybealsosenttold.TrialCourtwithdirectiontosendTCR
beforenextdate.
(SujataKohli)
s
StateVs.Satish@Pintu&Others
FIRNo.212/13
PS.KalyanPuri
U/s.302IPC
16.04.15
at2.40PM.
Pr:
Sh.I.H.Siddique,ld.SubstituteAddl.PPfortheState.
Sh.RoopRam,Ld.Counselforapplicant/accused.
ShDevenderKumar,Ld.Counselforcomplainantwith
complainant/applicant.
Ld. Counsel for complainant submits that the grievance of the
complainant stands met with and application of the complainant for

protectionmaybedisposedofassatisfied.
BailapplicationofaccusedSonuistakenforfurtherhearing.
ld.Counselforaccused/applicanthasaddressedfurtherargumentsat
lengthandtakenmethroughthetestimonyofPW6andPW11.
Putupfororderson25.04.15afterlunch.
(SujataKohli)
s
StateVs.Pawan
PS.GeetaColony
FIRNo.366/07
PS.328/379/411IPC
16.04.15
Pr:
NonefortheState.
Bothaccusedonbail.
Onthelastdate,LdAddl.PPfortheStatesoughttimetoclarifywith
respecttotheincriminatingmaterial regarding coaccusedMonu.Today

Ld.Addl.PPfortheStateisstatedbeonleaveandassuchmatterisbeing
adjournedforthesamepurposei.eclarificationto23.04.15.
(SujataKohli)
s
Crl.AppealNo.09/15
3.20PM
Pr:
Sh.ChandanBhatia,Ld.Counselforrevisionist.
Sh.PramodTyagi,Ld.Counselforrespondent.
Hestatesthathewouldnotfileanyreplyandwouldstraightawaydo
arguments and as such matter is listed for arguments on 08.05.15 after

lunch.
(SujataKohli)
s
Crl.AppealNo.08/15
3.20PM
Pr:

lunch.
(SujataKohli)
s
Crl.AppealNo.10/15
3.20PM
Pr:

lunch.
(SujataKohli)
s
Crl.AppealNo.11/15
3.20PM
Pr:

lunch.
(SujataKohli)
s
Crl.AppealNo.12/15
3.20PM
Pr:

lunch.
(SujataKohli)
s
FIRNo.552/08
PS.KalyanPuri
StateVs.ChanderKumar&Ors
16.04.15
Pr:
NonefortheState.
AllfouraccusedonbailwithSh.K.K.Sharma,Ld.LegalAidcounsel.
Todaymatterislistedforfinalarguments.
SinceRegularPPisstatedtobeonleavetoday,matterisadjournedto
22.04.15forfinalargumentsafterlunch.
(SujataKohli)
s
FIRNo.617/14
PS.Gazipur
StateVs.RamashishMehto
U/s.323/376/368/506IPC
3.30PM
16.04.15
Pr:
NonefortheState.
AccusedproducedfromJ/C.
SinceLd.Adld.PPfortheStateisstatedtobeonleave,assuchmatter
isbeingadjournedforargumentsontheapplicationundersection216Cr.
P.C.Thismattershallbelistedinmiscellaneousarguments.
Putupon30.04.15.
In the meantime Sh Tarun Kumar, advocate presses that he is
counselofaccusedinthiscase.Recordshowsthathestoppedconducting
proceedingsandontherequestofaccused,Sh.GauravVashisht,advocate
was appointedasAmicusCuriae. IthascometomyknowledgethatLd.
Counsel filed his vakaltnama way back in November 2014 and thereafter
stoppedconductingproceedings.AttheendofMarch, heagainchoseto
appear.Anadvocatecannotpickandchoosetorepresentaccusedasand
whenhefeelswhenaccusedisinJ/CandassuchcounselSh.TarunKumar
isdischargedfromthiscase.
LetcourtnoticebeissuedtoSh.GauravVashisth,Ld.AmicusCuriae.
(SujataKohli)
s
StateVs.BhailalVerma
FIRNo.161/2015
U/s.354IPCand12POCSOAct
PS.Mandawali
16.04.15
Pr:
NonefortheState.
AccusedproducedfromJ/C.
SILavkeshKumar.
Itakecognizance.
CopiesofchargsheetincludingCDarebeingsupplied.
Accused states that he has engaged private counsel and as such
matterisadjournedforargumentsonchargeon13.05.2015.
(SujataKohli)
s
StateVs.NafeesChaudhary
FIRNo.381/14
PS.KrishnaNagar
U/s.365/506/120BIPC
16.04.15
Pr:
Sh.SunilLd.Counselforaccused/applicant.
withIO/SIPawanKumar.
ShSunilKalra,Ldcounselforcomplainant.
Ms.SheetalChaudhary,daughterofthecomplainant.
Heard.
Putupfororderson20.04.15at4.00PM.
Policefileberetainedforfurtherclarificationstillthenextdate.
(SujataKohli)
Crl.AppealNo.08/15
3.20PM
Pr:

lunch.
(SujataKohli)
s
Crl.AppealNo.12/15
3.20PM
Pr:

lunch.
(SujataKohli)
s
Crl.AppealNo.10/15
3.20PM
Pr:

lunch.
(SujataKohli)
s
Crl.AppealNo.11/15
3.20PM
Pr:

lunch.
(SujataKohli)
s

List New2.ASP

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

List New2.ASP

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Dated:17.04.

This is to certify that HC Samarpal Singh No. 1956/East is

Preliminary hearing given on the revision. Main grievance of the

revisionist is that he had earlier stopped payment on same cheque in

complainant stands met with and application of the complainant for

respecttotheincriminatingmaterial regarding coaccusedMonu.Today

arguments and as such matter is listed for arguments on 08.05.15 after

arguments and as such matter is listed for arguments on 08.05.15 after

arguments and as such matter is listed for arguments on 08.05.15 after

arguments and as such matter is listed for arguments on 08.05.15 after

arguments and as such matter is listed for arguments on 08.05.15 after

arguments and as such matter is listed for arguments on 08.05.15 after

arguments and as such matter is listed for arguments on 08.05.15 after

arguments and as such matter is listed for arguments on 08.05.15 after

arguments and as such matter is listed for arguments on 08.05.15 after

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen