Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
GUIDELINES
This set of guidelines for the course Applied Research (ABR/BER794/796 &
BER747/777) is divided into the following sections:
1)
2)
3)
4)
SECTION ONE:
INTRODUCTION AND ADMINISTRATION
1.1
OVERVIEW
Central to all managerial activities is the ability to make informed business decisions. Often
the difference between making good decisions and committing blunders lies in how managers
go about the decision making process.
and analyze issues to ensure that all decisions made are well grounded with facts and strong
rationale. In cultivating these habits, managers are required to be aware of and be involved in
some form of research activity as and when they make decisions at the work place.
Further, managers often interact with research consultants who are engaged by the
organization. It is therefore necessary for managers to discriminate between good and bad
studies undertaken by these consultants. Whenever the need arises managers are required to
undertake or participate in research to solve problems.
required to evaluate the findings and value of studies published in professional journals and to
be able to adapt to the changing work environment.
It is for these and many other reasons that Applied Research (ABR/BER 796/BER 777) is a
compulsory activity and a REQUIRED experience for students prior to the award of the
MBA/MBE by the Arshad Ayub Graduate Business School, UiTM.
1.2
BUSINESS RESEARCH
Research. However research done with the intention of APPLYING the results of findings to
solve specific problems currently being experienced in the organization, or currently being
faced by a given task in a given environment that are constantly changing, is what ABR/BER is
all about.
expected, but thorough knowledge in specific areas of study, either applied to a given task or
environment is much encouraged.
ABR/BER/BER carries a 3 hours credit load with no classroom contact hours at all.
1.4
GROUP EFFORT
It is to be undertaken by a group of not more than 3 and not less than 2 students. This is to
enable students to realize that:
(i)
No one has a mastery of all the knowledge within an MBA/MBE curriculum. Hence
combined effort or teamwork would enable cross learning among participants.
(ii)
: =
9 credit
Case 2
: =
6 credit
This essentially means that each group is expected to spend at least 12 to 18 hours a week for
a period of not less than 120 to 150 days over two semesters. These hours are to be spent
independently undertaking literature review, developing the academic construct and research
methodology, developing research instruments, learning the appropriate measurement
methods, including the necessary statistical knowledge and the use of statistical packages
such as SPSS.
Since every member of the group is entitled to the 3 credit hours required for the award of the
degree and the resultant GPA and CGPA calculations, it is essential that every member fulfill
their individual responsibility and be accountable to the achievement of the group
performance. Therefore the spirit of one for all and all for one should be the motto adapted.
1.5
ABR/BER/BER is divided into two major phases (Chart 1.1). Phase 1 being the proposal stage
which must be completed one semester prior to the graduating semester.
The Faculty
reserves the right to reject any proposal deemed unacceptable. At this stage, early indication
of students capabilities to complete the project within the specific deadline will be determined.
The student group may at this point suggest/request/or name an advisor of their choice, but
the official appointment is subject to the expert judgment of the Program Coordinator.
Phase 2 of ABR/BER/BER consists of the actual data collection, analysis, and completion of the
final draft.
The final draft must be completed two to three weeks before the date of
presentation (VIVA).
incomplete work at this stage would result in a DELAY in graduation for the respective group
of students.
charged accordingly.
1.6
ROLES OF ADVISORS
Advisors can add value to the ABR/BER/BER process and contents when they uphold their
responsibilities through the following activities.
Table 1.1
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
output.
Chart 1.1
DEADLINE
PHASE/SEMESTER
ACTIVITY
EMBA
MBA/MBE
WEEK 1
PHASE 1
SEM. 2
SEM 3
WEEK 12
WEEK 14
WEEK 1
PHASE 2
SEM 3
SEM 4
WEEK 10
Revised
draft
Submission of
final draft
Project
withdrawal
Feedback from advisor
Project presentation/VIVA
WEEK
12-14
WEEK 15
(Fully bound
3 copies)
Submission of
final project
report
1.7
ROLES OF EXAMINERS
The examiners role is first, to ensure that the scientific process of applied research is adhered
to with the principal focus on academic construct and methodology such that the results of
analysis is consistent with the objectives of the applied research. This role will be fulfilled
primarily during the VIVA/presentation/examination, (refer advisor/examiner examination
guideline) .Secondly, in line with the main purpose of ABR/BER/BER, the ability of the
candidates in translating the research findings to solve a specific business problem needs to be
critically assessed. Should the examiner require advance preview, a summary or a set of
power point presentation material could be submitted in order for examiners to be prepared
prior to the students presentation.
1.8
VIVA/PRESENTATION
The (students) group will be required to present their research and findings of the
ABR/BER/BER at a scheduled time whereby two examiners will be present for evaluation, in
the presence of their advisor.
Such dates are fixed and are not subject to change, unless
1.9
ABR/BER EVALUATION
The primary advisor has the right to evaluate the research in his or her capacity as advisor.
The advisors evaluation carries 60% of the Final Grade for the group.
As a general rule,
every member of the group should obtain similar grade or equal marks. However, the advisor
has the authority to vary the grade according to his or her assessment of the contribution
from each group member on the entire project.
The other 40% of the Final Grade would consist of the average marks/evaluation assessed by
the 2 selected examiners. The grading format is in Specimen one.
6.2
GRADUATION REQUIREMENT
ABR/BER/BER is the capstone for the entire MBA/MBE program/curriculum and hence failure to
secure a B grade will lead to failure to obtain the Degree. Subject to the evaluation of the
Faculty, a group of students may apply for extension of time to complete the project, while the
Faculty also reserves the right to advise the students to continue for an additional semester to
ensure completion.
graduation
status of every member of the group, notwithstanding the CGPA required for the award of the
Degree.
6
SECTION TWO:
PROPOSAL GUIDELINES
1.
INTRODUCTION
Most institutes of higher learning have some required format for proposals to be submitted by
research students which are generally similar in context. The researcher has to draw up a plan
to investigate issues and solve some specific problems. Each proposal must provide some
explanation about the structure of the task, how it is conceptualized and the methods to be
used in carrying out the plan.
The Applied Research (ABR/BER 796/BER 777) course requires graduating students to submit
two main documents the project proposal and the final report. While writing the
former does not contribute to the overall grade of this course, its importance cannot be
underestimated. After all, one's research is only as a good as one's proposal. Besides,
the ABR/BER 796/BER 777 course treats the project proposal as a necessary prerequisite to
the final report.
A good proposal is direct and straight forward. It sells what the researcher(s) is proposing to
do and why she/he is proposing it. In other words, it must be compelling (that is, interesting),
manageable (able to be carried out), and significant (important for the stakeholders). This
handout, therefore, aims to facilitate and guide final year MBA/MBE students in writing up a
good project proposal. For this purpose, the guideline is arranged into four major sections
getting started, research process, ABP proposal format, and research expectations.
2.
GETTING STARTED
In essence, ABR/BER 795 will equip students with the basic skills of undertaking research, and
how research is used to support management decision making. It is also a capstone course
that requires students to apply at least one business decision making tool to synthesize the
research outcomes and to offer actionable managerial decisions. Therefore, it is always
advisable (although it is not necessary for MBA students) that candidates should begin the ABP
project by getting acquaintance with a business organization. For EMBA students, the
students workplace is a good place to start.
For most students, getting started is synonymous with numerous head scratching sessions
leading to the project title. In most cases, at least two or three topics are generated for
discussion among group members (made up of a minimum 2 persons and a maximum 3
persons).
This is definitely not a bad way of starting ABR/BER 795 project, as long as these ideas are not
generated out of nowhere or based on gut feeling. Ideas must come from a reliable source,
usually from a respected person in an industry, from observation over a certain period of time
or from undertaking desk research (Section 3 will elaborate more on this aspect). Table 2.1
provides a What, Why, and How Framework (source: Watson, 1994b:S80) to get you started.
Table 2.1 What, Why, and How Framework for Crafting Research
What?
Why?
Why is this of interest to others (member of my
group, my work environment, practitioners or
policy makers?)
Can the research be justified as a contribution to
problem solving process or solutions to my
current problems?
How conceptually?
How practically?
What investigative styles and techniques shall I
use to apply my conceptual framework (both to
gather material and analyze it)?
How shall I gain and maintain access to
information sources?
(Academic Construct/Tools
Theoretical Framework)
(Methodology)
From the academic perspective, writing a research proposal should begin with an inquiry into
the need for a particular research topic leading to a research/project title (Chart 3.1 The
Research Process). This inquiry provides a starting point for the activities of identifying the key
issues leading to research problem definition, setting
information and data requirements, developing a research plan, and designing the data
collection method.
1
Recognize the Need
for Research
8
Prepare Research Report;
Communicate Findings
7
Process/Analyze Data
and Interpret Results
2
Define the Research
Problem and Objectives
Research
Process
6
Perform the Research
Data Collection
5
Design Method for
Collecting Data
3
Specify Information and
Data Requirements
4
Develop the
Research Plan
advisable to keep in mind that this course (ABR/BER 795) is two-pronged in nature - to
enhance the employability of graduating MBAs and to lay foundation for career enhancement
and career change among graduating EMBAs. Thus, do choose problematic area/s that could
gear you towards your future career advancement.
Step 2: Define the Research Problem and Objectives
The problem identification stage calls for further preliminary data gathering.
Talking to
industry experts, in depth reading of specific magazines, trade news, and popular periodicals
or undertaking a simple survey are examples of this activity. Integration of the information
obtained through these informal and formal search exercises should help a researcher to
determine and strengthen the argument that a problem or problems do exist. Naturally,
understanding of the business tools/models learned throughout the MBA program would
facilitate the problem definition process.
Note that, the existence of a problem or problems does not necessarily mean that something
is seriously wrong with a current situation that needs to be rectified immediately. A problem
could simply indicate an interest in an issue where finding the right answers might help to
improve an existing situation. Hence, it is often advised to define a problem as any situation
where a GAP exists between the actual and the desired state of affairs. Be careful to ensure
that symptoms are not defined as a real problem.
Once a gap has been found, a problem statement is written out. Problem definition or
problem statement is a clear, precise, and succinct statement of the question or issue that is
to be investigated with the goal of finding an answer or solution (Sekaran, 2003, p. 70).
Based on the problem definition, a set of research objectives are then proposed. As a general
guideline, a good problem statement should spell out what is wrong with the current situation
and what are the information needed/variables to be studied in order to solve the current
situation. Appendix 1 provides two examples.
data
include
information
from
books,
journals,
newspapers,
magazines,
government publications, previous academic works, financial, marketing and other reports,
annual reports. Table 3.1 provides a breakdown of secondary data sources and their
importance according to the stages in the research process. The UiTM library subscribes and
provides a comprehensive source of primary data for your convenience. Seek help from the
library staff if you are unfamiliar with data search.
10
What it does
Examples
Research
Process
Needed for Step 1
of the research
process
Provides an overview of a
topic and provides leads to
where more information
can be found
Daily newspapers,
popular periodicals
and magazines,
and trade books.
Secondary Sources
Books on specific
subjects and
business models,
bank reports, KLSE
Primary Sources
Journals, abstracts
and scholarly
books, bank
reports/prospectus,
Data of Companies
in KLSE
Due to the academic nature of the ABR/BER796/BER777 course, at this stage of the research
process, graduating candidates are expected to carry out and to document a relatively
comprehensive review of literature from secondary data sources in the chosen area of the
research problem. A substantial literature survey/review is important as it provides the
foundation for the academic construct or theoretical framework or business model of the
research. Be forewarned that students usually find this activity an exasperating and difficult
process. However, at the end of the day, it is a worthwhile effort as it provides you with a
deeper understanding of the way/s to go about addressing the GAP in your problem
statement. Furthermore, this process will equip you with richer research vocabularies to dazzle
current/future bosses!
11
i)
The theoretical framework is the foundation on which the entire research project is
based. It is logically developed, described, and elaborated network of associations
ii)
among the variables deemed relevant to the problem situation and identified through
preliminary investigations, observations, and literature survey (Sekaran, 2003).
iii)
The basis of Theoretical Framework or Academic Construct are the basic acceptable
foundations found in any specific areas of study or concepts that are common and
specific (in some cases) to the core area of study, be it marketing, accounting,
management, HRM and other related fundamental functional areas of management
including operations and technology.
iv)
v)
b)
The discussion should state how the variables are related and relationships
established.
c)
d)
e)
Note****
Decision
making
tools in
Appendix 3
could
be
used
as the
Theoretical
Framework/Academic Construct.
(i)
(ii)
http://www.valuebasedmanagement.net/
Have and Have and Frans Stevens, The Management Tools
and Practices that will Improve Your Business, Prentice
Hall, 2003, ISBN: 0-273-66201-5
12
research works are confined to DESCRIPTIVE STUDY and CASE STUDY while only
occasionally a CORRELATIONAL STUDY may be attempted. A FIELD STUDY focusing on
the relationship between variables (e.g. interest rates and deposit patterns etc) which is
often done in a noncontrived setting, with no interference, is acceptable.
However LAB
13
2. UNIT OF ANALYSIS refers to the source from where information is going to be extracted.
Individuals, groups, dyads, divisions, companies, industry, or countries are examples. In
all circumstances the unit of analysis must be clearly identified.
Below are illustrations of the sampling methods (not exhaustive) which you
Stratified Sampling
Cluster Sampling
Convenience Sampling
appropriate advisors
Quota Sampling
Do note that the literature review should guide you in choosing the most appropriate research
design to address the problem statement and research objectives. In any case, it must
be
Questionnaires
Observation
of individual events.
It must be noted that students engaging in non-pure finance topics and who are planning to
use a questionnaire as the research instrument, must be very, very familiar with the various
14
INTERVAL, and /or RATIO scales must be appropriate and applicable to the types of data to be
collected for analysis.
/ SPSS;
NAVIGATOR
Step 5: Research Methodology (Finance and Economics)
Having identified the variables in a problem situation and developed the theoretical
framework, the next step is to design the research in a way that the requisite data can be
gathered and analyzed to arrive at a solution. It is therefore the description of the research
journey. Testable hypotheses which are developed from the theoretical framework will be
tested and that determines the relationship between the variables in study.
After the sections on literature review and theoretical framework have been securely identified
and noted, the next step in the research process is to identify the respective variables as well
as measure them. Secondary data sources, which are interpretations of primary data, can be
found in company records, government publications industry analysis and other centralized
and reliable sources including those from the Internet.
It is important to note that most databases provide bibliographic citations or records from
books or journals that enable researchers a faster way of gaining access to literature. There
are also certain databases that provide historical time series data that enable researchers
investigate and test hypotheses. Some relevant examples are provided in the table below.
Information
Sources
http://www.bnm.gov.my
15
http://www.statistics.gov.my
World
Bank,
World
Indicators, Database
http://www.worldbank.org
Development
http://www.bis.org
http://www.imf.org
CIA Factbook
https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/index.html
US Census Bureau
http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/idbnew.html
Research design involves a series of rational decision-making steps to design the research so
that requisite data can be gathered and analyzed to arrive at a solution. This section also
provides the major skeletal framework for the research. The methodological areas that need
to be addressed in the proposal for this ABR/BER796/BER777 course are:
1. Data and Sample Statistics
a.
b.
Sample of Study
Sample of variables, time period, explanation of variables, formulas, expected
signs, etc.
c.
Statement of Hypothesis
A number of hypotheses relevant to the objectives set in the research plan
including null or alternative hypothesis.
models, non-linear models and many others. One simple example is the
explanation of the regression equation in the simple/multiple regression
analysis which applies the variables in its model. Explanation should also be
provided for the relevant dependent and independent variables in the model.
b.
Descriptive Statistics
In order to have a feel for the data collected for analysis, it is important to first
check the data series for normality, stationarity, and other statistical problems
including heteroscedasticity, autocorrelation, and multicollinearity. A general
description of the data should provide the mean, standard deviation, max/min,
skewness and kurtosis of all the data series to be tested.
c.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is used when sample statistics are obtained to estimate the
overall population decision in examining data. The following steps are followed
in conducting hypothesis tests:
Step 1:
Step 2:
Step 3:
Step 4:
Step 5:
17
e.
Correlation Coefficient
Correlation coefficient, r, is the degree of association between independent
and dependent variables. The coefficient ranges from +1 to -1. It is
categorized into one of the following category listed for linear correlation
coefficient result:
r=1
r=0
no linear correlation
t-stats
T-statistic is used to determine if there is significant relationship between the
independent variable and the dependent variable. It also measures the
probable error in the predictive value. It is calculated by dividing the
coefficient by the standard error and the confidence interval used is normally
95%. It is used when we test one population correlation coefficient when both
variables are quantitative and when the sample is small.
h.
p -values
Statistical tests that report the extent to which the test statistic disagrees with
the null hypothesis when one wants to know what percentage of the sampling
distribution lies beyond the sample statistics; most statistical computer
programs report the results of statistical tests as probability values (p values).
18
F-stats, F-Probability
The test statistic for ANOVA is the F ratio which compares the variance from
the last 2 sources i.e. the between-group variance/within-group variance. To
compute the F ratio, the sum of the squared deviations for the numerator and
denominator are divided by their respective degrees of freedom. By dividing,
we are computing the variance as an average or mean, thus the term mean
square. The degree of freedom for the numerator, the mean square between
groups, is one less than the number of groups (k-1). The degree of freedom
for the denominator, the mean square within groups, is the total number of
observations minus the number of groups (n-k). The higher the F-stats or the
lower the f-prob, the more significant the model in explaining changes in the
dependent variable.
Introduction/scenario/objectives/significance/scope/limitations.
Section 2
Literature Review.
Section 3
Section 4
Section 5
A Gantt chart, depicting timeline for research implementation must accompany any proposal.
In terms of formatting as in the context of title page, font, spacing, margin and etc., THE
GUIDELINES ON THESIS FORMAT For Graduate Programs published by Institute of Graduate
Studies should be observed.
To further guide your proposal writing, do note that, to write:
B.
Section 1 Issues in Step 1 and Step 2 of the research process must be clearly dealt
with. A brief write-up of the company under study (if applicable) should also be
included.
19
C.
Only essential
Section 3 Issues in Step 4. Essentially this section lays down the Theoretical
Framework/Academic construct and the ensuing research questions or hypotheses.
Theoretical Framework/Academic construct is a MUST as it highlights the focus of your
research as well as relates to the research plan (type of study).
E.
Section 4 - Issues in Step 5 of the research process. This section must provide
arguments for your choice of methodology.
5.
RESEARCH EXPECTATION
Keeping to deadlines is a must. From the academic perspective (see also Appendix 4 and 5),
the proposal must meet most of the following Scientific Investigation rules:
*1.
Purposiveness:
Definite aim or purpose, i.e. purposive focus.
*2.
Rigor:
A good theoretical base and a sound methodological design.
*3.
Testability:
Assuming, a researcher hypothesizes employees who are late for work are lazy and
lack commitment to task. A correlation analysis could substantiate this.
4.
Replicability:
Similar findings emerge on the basis of data collected by other organizations
employing the same methods.
5.
*6.
Objectivity:
20
Conclusions drawn through the interpretation of the results of data analysis should be
objective; i.e. they should be based on the facts of the findings derived from actual
data, and not on the researchers own subjective or emotional values or imagination.
*7.
Generalizability
The scope of applicability of the research findings in one organizational setting. The
wider the range of applicability of the solutions generated by the research the more
useful the research is to the users.
8.
Parsimony
Simplicity in explaining the problems that occur, and in generating solutions for the
problems, is always preferred.
* Essential elements
6.
SUMMARY
The research proposal, as emphasized in the early part of this handbook, is the first document
that provides evidence to your seriousness in pursuing and completing the MBA/EMBA
program. An ill-conceived proposal dooms the project even if it somehow gets approved. A
high quality proposal, on the other hand, not only promises success for the project, but also
impresses your advisor, examiner, and eventually your potential /current organization.
21
SECTION THREE:
RESEARCH REPORT
3.1
INTRODUCTION
At the end of the ABR/BER endeavour, besides the bitter sweet memories of going through
this research experience, your final report will be what you are left with and what will be
referred to by others. Thus, all students should write with the aim of leaving good quality
academic work behind, as you exit the graduate school.
Naturally, the quality of the entire ABR/BER project is reflected in the written report. While
writing styles may differ from one person to another, it must be noted that clarity and good
organisation of thought are important. In essence, writing a good report is a demanding task.
Nonetheless, to be able to tell the audience something that you have discovered can be truly
exciting. This section provides a guideline for the structure of a research report.
3.2
In almost any research work, the reporting is organised into FIVE basic chapters. Appendix 6
and 7 provide the ABR/BER format for Non-Finance and Finance students respectively. Note
that in terms of formatting as in the context of title page, font, spacing, margin and etc.,
THE GUIDELINES ON THESIS FORMAT For Graduate Programs published by the Institute of
Graduate Studies (IGS) should be observed.
3.3
CONCLUSION
While this ABR/BER handbook aims to provide sufficient guide for graduate students to
prepare
for
the
ABR/BER
project,
this
handbook
is
by
no
means
conclusive
and
comprehensive. This is where the guidance of your academic advisor must be sought and
observed. They will have the final say of your ABR/BER process and their opinion must be
respected and adhered to.
Appendix 1
Topic, Problem Statement and Research objectives
Topic 1: Return to dominant position: Strategy in hyper-competition
condition and sustaining competitive advantage: Case Study
Celcom (Malaysia) Berhad
Problem Statement
The aggressive market as reflected in the previous data has introduced a hypercompetition condition in the cellular industry in which the players are now launching
strategies for competitive advantage. This situation has indeed negatively affected
Celcoms market and revenue shares. The issue in question is how to survive in the
current market condition? Can the company re-juvenate lf and re-gain the market
share?
Research objectives
The objectives of this proposal, therefore, are as follows:
to verify a competitive position of a main player in the telecommunication
industry;
to identify specific competitive issues faced by a main player in the industry;
to formulate and recommend appropriate competitive strategy or strategies for
Celcom in strengthening its position as the market leader.
To
To
To
To
To
23
Appendix 2
Entrant
Incumbent
Builds or
inherits
entry barriers
Attacks soft
Market
segment
No response
Widens attack
to
adjacent
segments
Reinforces
barriers
Starts price
war
Attacks
entrants
home market
Restarts the
cycle
in adjacent
market
Source: Adapted from R.A. DAveni with Robert Gunther, Hypr-Competitive Rivalries: Competing in a Highly Dynamic Environment 1994, Free
Press, 1995 p.115
24
Appendix 2 - continuation
Firm infrastructure
Human resource management
Technology development
Procurement
Margin
Firm infrastructure
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
Margin
Margin
Margin
Primary
Primary
Information Flow
S
U
P
P
L
I
E
R
S
Cash Flow
Planning
&
Forecasting
Distribution
&
Logistics
Production
Procurement
25
Custome
r
Service
Performance
Measures
C
U
S
T
O
M
E
R
S
Appendix 3
BUSINESS MODELS/TOOL
26
Appendix 4
POSSIBLE ABR/BER CHECK LIST
(Topical Areas of Research)
A.
B.
C.
Restructuring Projects.
D.
E.
F.
G.
Operational Projects
- operational expansion
- cost management and efficiency
- Activity Based Costing (ABC)
- Business Process Engineering
H.
I.
27
Appendix 5
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
28
Appendix 6
REPORT WRITING FORMAT NON FINANCE
ABSTRACT
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
The
The
The
The
The
research design
population and sample size
instrument for the research
fieldwork and data collection method
data analysis
Profile of respondents
Discussion of findings one/objective one/hypothesis one/research question one
Discussion of findings two/ objective one/hypothesis one/research question one
Discussion of findings three/ objective one/hypothesis one/research question one
Discussion of findings four/ objective one/hypothesis one/research question one
Discussion and synthesizing the findings and implications to the theoretical
framework/Academic construct
Bibliography
Appendix
In terms of formatting as in the context of title page, font, spacing, margin and etc., THE
GUIDELINES ON THESIS FORMAT For Graduate Programs published by IGS should be
observed.
29
Appendix 7
REPORT WRITING FORMAT FINANCE
Chapter One: Introduction
1.1
Background of the Industry/Study
1.2
Problem Statement
1.3
Research Questions
1.4
Objectives of the Study
1.5
Scope of Study
1.6
Significance of Study
1.7
Definition of Terms
Chapter Two: Literature Review
2.1
Introduction
2.2
Individual sections on literature
Chapter Three Research Methodology
3.1
Data and Sample Statistics
3.1.1 Data and Sources of Data
3.1.2 Sample of Study
3.1.3 Theoretical Framework
3.1.4 Statement of Hypothesis
3.2
Statistical Method of Analysis
3.2.1 Types of Tests and Statistical Software
3.2.2 Simple/Multiple Linear Regression
3.2.3 Correlation Coefficient
3.2.4 Coefficient of Determination
3.2.5 Hypothesis Testing
Chapter Four: Empirical Findings
4.1
Introduction
4.1
Descriptive Statistics
4.3
Interpretation of Results
Chapter Five: Conclusion
5.1
Summary and Conclusion
5.2
Recommendation for Future Studies
5.3
Limitations of the Study
Bibliography
Appendix
In terms of formatting as in the context of title page, font, spacing, margin and etc., THE
GUIDELINES ON THESIS FORMAT For Graduate Programs published by IGS should be
observed.
30
Specimen 1
ABR/BER796/BER777
ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION
NOTES: FOCUS OF EXAMINERS
1.
2.
3.
To ensure the focus of ABR/BER research type of research processes, i.e.: Social
Field Studies, reflect the Descriptive survey, Controlled Experiments, Field
Experiment, Sample Survey, or Case Study. By definition the focus of ABR/BER is on
Case Study appropriate to the area of study reflecting the breadth and depth of
various subject areas with preferences to the candidates current work
environments.
4.
5.
6.
Report must also portray the timeliness of issues, concerns, and problems facing any
profession with the context of challenges to business operations in the country.
Given the above, evaluation of the respective presentation are governed by the following
criterion and values. Below are the proportion of the total marks contributed by the
Advisor, Examiner I and Examiner II.
60% - Advisor
Final Report
85%
20% - Examiner
I
20% - Examiner
II
5% - Advisor
Presentation
TOTAL MARKS
15%
5% - Examiner I
100%31
5% - Examiner II
ABR/BER796/BER777
APPLIED BUSINESS RESEARCH
ADVISOR/EXAMINERS FINAL REPORT EVALUATION
Please tick ()
Advisor
Examiner
Topic :
Students ID:
Name of Students:
1. ..
2. ..
3. ..
POINTS
ALLOCATED
EVALUATION CRITERIA
A.
POINTS
AWARDED
PROJECT ETHICS
(Advisors subjectivity and freedom)
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
4
4
4
2
14
B.
3
5
5
4
4
4
5
30
NOTES:
1.
2.
32
Points
Allocated
Evaluation Criteria
C.
LITERATURE REVIEW
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
3
3
3
3
12
33
Points
Awarded
D.
FINAL REPORT
i)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
ix)
x)
xi)
4
44
100
TOTAL
34
TITLE :
Advisor/Examiner
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
Please rate the respective presentation according to the following criterion and value. Of the
total only 15% will be prorated for contribution to final grade and marks.
Points earned
Points
Assessment Criteria
allocated
Student 1
Student 2
Student 3
A. PRESENTERS/RESEARCHERS
(10 marks)
(i) Overall appearance and pleasantry
5
(i) Confidence, comfort, and control of the
environment and mannerism
5
5
C. APPROPRIATENESS OF LITERATURE
(15 marks)
(i)
35
Points
allocated
Assessment Criteria
D. QUALITY OF THE PROJECT/RESEARCH
(35 marks)
(i)
(25 marks)
(iv) Responses/justifications to
questions/issues/raised by examiners.
TOTAL
100
36
Points earned
Student 1
Student 2
Student 3
Serious Weaknesses 1. .
2. .
3. .
B.
Specific Strengths
1. .
2. .
3. .
Advisor
Examiner (1)
Examiner (2)
37