Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
CRL.M.C. 4467/2014
..... Respondents
Represented by: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP
for State.
Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv. R2 and R3.
CORAM:
HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT
SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral)
1.
Page 1 of 9
under Sections 308/34 IPC was registered at the same Police Station
against the respondents.
submits that now both the parties have become close relatives and
respondent nos. 2 and 3 do not want to pursue the case further
against the petitioners and if the present case is sent for trial it will
be a futile exercise and sheer wastage of time.
4.
not
compoundable.
However,
considering
the
facts
Page 2 of 9
and
Page 3 of 9
the case of Narinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab & Anr.
2014 6 SCC 466 wherein held as under:31. In view of the aforesaid discussion, we sum up and
lay down the following principles by which the High
Court would be guided in giving adequate treatment to
the settlement between the parties and exercising its
power under Section 482 of the Code while accepting
the settlement and quashing the proceedings or
Page 4 of 9
Page 5 of 9
Page 6 of 9
Page 7 of 9
that vide order dated 28.11.2014, Police has already been directed
not to take coercive action in this matter. Moreover, the petitioner
no. 1 has married with sister of respondent nos. 2 and 3. Thus, both
the parties have become close relatives. They have compromised
both the FIRs mentioned above.
Page 8 of 9
10.
SURESH KAIT, J.
JULY 02, 2015
jg/sb
Page 9 of 9